18.04.2014 Views

CAAP 30: The Issue & Renewal of an Aerodrome Certificate

CAAP 30: The Issue & Renewal of an Aerodrome Certificate

CAAP 30: The Issue & Renewal of an Aerodrome Certificate

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Case 4 <strong>The</strong> GCAA has sufficient<br />

evidence with which to<br />

conclude that the aerodrome<br />

certificate holder is not<br />

competent to ensure that the<br />

aerodrome <strong>an</strong>d its airspace are<br />

safe for use by aircraft<br />

ANS ‘ON NOTICE’ PROCEDURE<br />

Propose to revoke<br />

the aerodrome<br />

certificate <strong>an</strong>d in<br />

the me<strong>an</strong>time<br />

suspend if not<br />

already suspended<br />

CAR Part IX,<br />

Chapter 2<br />

In the event that the GCAA has observed a trend which, if unchecked,<br />

would lead it to cease to be satisfied as to the competence <strong>of</strong> the<br />

certificate holder, the GCAA will contact the certificate holder to set out the<br />

GCAA’s concerns. <strong>The</strong> GCAA will make it clear that unless the trend is<br />

reversed the GCAA may cease to be satisfied as to the competence <strong>of</strong> the<br />

certificate holder, in which circumst<strong>an</strong>ces it may take further action in<br />

accord<strong>an</strong>ce with Case 3 or Case 4 as listed in 1.5.<br />

It is import<strong>an</strong>t to recognise that every case needs to be judged on the<br />

individual circumst<strong>an</strong>ces. Examples <strong>of</strong> what could prompt action in<br />

accord<strong>an</strong>ce with Cases 2, 3 or 4 are:<br />

• Safety Signific<strong>an</strong>t Non Compli<strong>an</strong>t Audit Findings;<br />

• Repetitive Audit Findings, including a failure to identify root causes<br />

<strong>of</strong> findings or a ‘sticking plaster’ approach to findings;<br />

• Signific<strong>an</strong>t incidents, together with a failure to investigate properly<br />

<strong>an</strong>d deal with the root causes;<br />

• An increasing number <strong>of</strong> incidents, indicating <strong>an</strong> underlying<br />

systemic failure;<br />

• Poor m<strong>an</strong>agement attitude to compli<strong>an</strong>ce;<br />

• A m<strong>an</strong>agement that prefers solutions that simply address the detail<br />

<strong>of</strong> the finding <strong>an</strong>d that is unwilling or unable to put measures in<br />

place that address the root cause <strong>of</strong> non-compli<strong>an</strong>ces;<br />

• Unstable/ineffective m<strong>an</strong>agement. Instability c<strong>an</strong> be caused by<br />

excessive ch<strong>an</strong>ges in structure, personnel, or both.<br />

<strong>The</strong> GCAA will set out its concerns <strong>an</strong>d request a recovery pl<strong>an</strong> from the<br />

certificate holder to address the causes <strong>of</strong> the adverse trend. <strong>The</strong> recovery<br />

pl<strong>an</strong> should provide deliverables that c<strong>an</strong> be measured, including specific<br />

timescales. <strong>The</strong> recovery pl<strong>an</strong> should set out clearly the “who, what,<br />

<strong>The</strong> <strong>Issue</strong> <strong>an</strong>d <strong>Renewal</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>an</strong> <strong>Aerodrome</strong> <strong>Certificate</strong> 1 Sept 2009 Page 11

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!