20.04.2014 Views

2007 Silicon Valley Projections - Silicon Valley Leadership Group

2007 Silicon Valley Projections - Silicon Valley Leadership Group

2007 Silicon Valley Projections - Silicon Valley Leadership Group

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Education<br />

These changes in student demographics have ramifications at<br />

the end of the “pipeline.”<br />

For our Latino students, the college pipeline—and thus the<br />

workforce pipeline—is narrow. According to the Public Policy<br />

Institute of California, Latino students make up 33% of the<br />

state’s public high school graduates, but 14% of UC enrollees<br />

and 23% of CSU enrollees. Moreover, only 16% of Latino students<br />

are eligible for CSU and 7% are eligible for UC—half of<br />

their white counterparts. (Source: PPIC; Educational<br />

Resources and Outcomes by Race & Ethnicity, 2005)<br />

In <strong>Silicon</strong> <strong>Valley</strong>, the scope of the path and reliability of this<br />

“pipeline” becomes evident upon examination of the class<br />

enrollment data for ethnic groups in the region.<br />

In large part, the past decade shows increasing enrollment in<br />

college preparatory classes within each of the ethnic groups in<br />

<strong>Silicon</strong> <strong>Valley</strong> (see bar graphs). But, in the context of all of the<br />

9-12th grade students enrolled in those courses, as the courses<br />

progress, the share of Latino students enrolling declines dramatically.<br />

(Note: SVLG data analysis found this to be true in<br />

1st year chemistry and physics enrollment.)<br />

How California and <strong>Silicon</strong> <strong>Valley</strong><br />

Can Make Progress<br />

Student success in K-12 will come from a strong teacher<br />

and principal corps. The teaching profession is in constant<br />

change, and the demographics surrounding it are not promising:<br />

more teachers retiring than entering, mandates from<br />

Sacramento multiplying, and teacher salaries lagging behind<br />

the cost of living, to name a few.<br />

The state must support professional development to ensure<br />

that schools are implementing a sound, standards-based<br />

curriculum and instructional programs, and provide teachers<br />

and principals with the tools needed to instruct a diverse population<br />

in a changing world. If the state is serious about developing,<br />

recruiting and retaining teachers—particularly in<br />

math and science—then it should invest with “both feet.”<br />

The California Teach program, which is designed to recruit<br />

science and math graduates into the teaching profession,<br />

received most of its initial funding from the private sector and<br />

$1 million from the state.<br />

Investing in what matters. Achievement and advancement<br />

in math and science are the bedrock of <strong>Silicon</strong> <strong>Valley</strong>’s innovation<br />

economy. Our nation, state and region—particularly<br />

within high-need schools—are facing a critical shortage of<br />

math and science teachers. The way that the state allocates<br />

funding—in an overly complex manner and through a myriad<br />

of restrictive categorical programs—does little to allow our<br />

public K-12 and higher education systems to adapt to changing<br />

times. Moreover, market forces must enter into the equation<br />

for recruiting and retaining talent in critical fields.<br />

Hold districts to high standards and give them flexibility<br />

to meet those standards. It is common practice to give districts,<br />

in the name of local control, additional resources that<br />

are quickly followed by restrictions. The state has established<br />

a standards and accountability system. Districts should be<br />

allowed to retain flexibility in meeting those standards; districts<br />

that are successful retain flexibility and districts that are<br />

not as successful receive less. The current system does not<br />

allow innovation at the district or school level.<br />

Students need to be aware of the pathways ahead of them<br />

(workplace, college, financial aid, etc.). This is particularly<br />

important for students of immigrant families or from underrepresented<br />

populations. The fact that an entire high school<br />

might share a guidance counselor or two is unacceptable,<br />

although recent efforts by the Legislature and Governor to earmark<br />

funding for guidance counselors is a step in the right<br />

direction.<br />

Access to college needs to be available and predictable.<br />

Students and families should not have to wonder from year to<br />

year whether there will be a place for qualified applicants at<br />

state colleges and universities and what it might cost.<br />

Skills for entering the workplace and for entering college<br />

are converging. A high school diploma needs to convey that<br />

the graduate has mastered a specific set of skills; that, in large<br />

part, the student is prepared to enter college, university or<br />

the workforce; and that it is not the end of the individual’s<br />

learning. California needs to maintain high standards and<br />

expectations, and students will rise to the occasion.<br />

Make decisions based on accurate student and teacher<br />

data. As California rightfully raises academic standards, it<br />

needs a data system that will support accountability, particularly<br />

when it comes to high school graduation and proficien-<br />

21

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!