23.04.2014 Views

Boring - Trenchless International

Boring - Trenchless International

Boring - Trenchless International

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

gas<br />

April 2010 - <strong>Trenchless</strong> <strong>International</strong><br />

information was examined that showed<br />

surface gravels to a depth of approximately<br />

12–15 metres. The gravels were<br />

deposited above claystone, shale and<br />

sandstone bedrock, which was expected<br />

to provide a good path for the HDD. This<br />

information had been gathered for a previous<br />

project which was over 100 metres<br />

away from the chosen crossing route.<br />

Additional geotechnical boreholes were<br />

Entec <strong>Trenchless</strong> Engineering is:<br />

HDD cranes on Peace River.<br />

then planned to confirm these results<br />

while preliminary designs were prepared.<br />

Due to the presence of gravels on<br />

both the entry and exit side, a pilot hole<br />

intersect was proposed to allow the installation<br />

of surface casing on both sides of<br />

the crossing. Given the consistency of<br />

the bedrock materials, determination of<br />

the intersect location was left up to the<br />

drilling contractor. Since an intersect was<br />

• Earth Sciences for the Global Construction Market<br />

• World Class Drilling Solutions Designers and<br />

Managers<br />

• Developers of Industry Standards through Award<br />

Winning Innovation<br />

• Engineered Answers through Engineering Expertise<br />

• Defining Industry Leadership for the Future...Now!<br />

Contact: Grant Jameson<br />

email info@entecinc.com phone + 1-(403)-319-0443<br />

www.entecinc.com<br />

required to complete the crossing, drilling<br />

contractors with successful pilot hole drilling<br />

intersect experience were selected as<br />

potential bidders for the project.<br />

The preliminary design called for entry<br />

and exit angles of twelve degrees to balance<br />

the need for keeping the exit side<br />

casing as short as possible with the need<br />

to reduce the pipe lifting requirements for<br />

pullback. Due to the diameter of the pipeline<br />

a minimum 60 inch diameter surface<br />

casing was required. The large diameter,<br />

when combined with the length of the casing,<br />

required planning to install the casing<br />

in two telescoped stages. Ultimately a<br />

final diameter of 76 inch casing being<br />

placed through a shorter length of 84 inch<br />

diameter casing was selected to allow<br />

the casing to reach a target length of<br />

78 metres. The target depth was selected<br />

to allow the casing to seat into bedrock<br />

at a vertical depth of 12–15 metres with<br />

some extra length for contingency. A<br />

final diameter of 76 inches was proposed<br />

to allow a smaller casing to be used as<br />

contingency against failure to reach the<br />

target depth.<br />

Due to the long lead time for large diameter<br />

casing pipe, the materials had to be<br />

ordered prior to the completion of the new<br />

geotechnical boreholes. Unfortunately<br />

results from the geotechnical boreholes<br />

drilled at the actual crossing location<br />

showed gravel to a depth of 19 metres.<br />

Due to this change in design constraints<br />

the exit angle of the crossing needed to<br />

be increased to 15 degrees to allow the<br />

use of the previously ordered materials at<br />

the expense of greater pipe lifting requirements<br />

for pullback. Given the new exit<br />

angle of 15 degrees and a target depth<br />

of 19 metres the exit side surface casing<br />

needed to isolate 76 linear metres of<br />

the drill path from unconsolidated sand,<br />

gravel and cobbles.<br />

The entry side gravel thicknesses were<br />

confirmed by the new geotech and the<br />

entry casing was left at its original angle<br />

of 12 degrees and proposed length of<br />

53 metres.<br />

Entec was concerned that the large<br />

buoyant forces exerted by the 42 inch<br />

pipeline during pullback could damage<br />

the pipe coating as it passed through<br />

the long steel exit and entry casings.<br />

To address this concern, a buoyancy<br />

control plan was designed to ensure the<br />

pipeline passed through the casings and<br />

the borehole with near neutral buoyancy,<br />

minimising the risk of coating damage.<br />

Also of concern was the possibility that<br />

the pipeline coating could be damaged<br />

by a misalignment between the pipeline<br />

pull section and the exit casing during<br />

pullback. A misalignment could result in<br />

binding between the pipeline and casing.<br />

For this reason a detailed lifting plan<br />

was prepared to ensure the position and<br />

heights of the lifting equipment allowed<br />

the pipeline to precisely match the exit<br />

angle without placing excessive stresses<br />

on the pipeline during installation.<br />

The final design consideration was<br />

the possibility that the surface casing<br />

might not be extracted or could damage<br />

the pipeline during extraction and could<br />

accelerate corrosion of the pipeline. To<br />

mitigate against this risk, casing insulators<br />

were to be installed in the event the casing<br />

could not be removed after pipe pullback.<br />

Surface casing and pilot hole<br />

construction<br />

Entry side surface casing was installed<br />

in November 2008 and reached refusal<br />

at 24 metres in length or 5 metres vertical<br />

depth. This was well in advance of<br />

the 53 metres of casing expected to<br />

be installed according to the geotechnical<br />

investigation that found bedrock<br />

at 9 metres vertical depth. Subsequent<br />

excavation to confirm the bedrock depth<br />

revealed the bedrock to be at five metres<br />

below ground surface and the casing was<br />

re-seated into bedrock.<br />

Exit side surface casing installation<br />

began once frozen conditions were<br />

present in early December. Installation<br />

began with the excavation of a launch<br />

pit and hammering of the 84 inch surface<br />

casing. The 84 inch casing reached<br />

refusal at 41 metres. The 84 inch casing<br />

was then augered clean and the 76<br />

inch casing installation was started. The<br />

76 inch surface casing reached refusal<br />

at a final depth of 74 metres but was not<br />

yet seated into the bedrock needed for<br />

the HDD drilling and reaming operations.<br />

Successful contingency planning allowed<br />

the installation of 60 inch diameter casing<br />

that was installed to a final length of<br />

88 metres and firmly sealed into bedrock<br />

at 22 vertical metres.<br />

While the final metres of exit side<br />

casing were being installed the pilot<br />

hole was started on the entry side of<br />

the crossing using Direct Horizontal’s<br />

American Augers DD1100 drilling rig<br />

which reached a final drilled depth of<br />

980 metres where it waited for the exit<br />

side pilot hole to begin.<br />

The casing installation faced several<br />

challenges including long welding times,<br />

slow penetration rates and extreme cold,<br />

but the exit side HDD rig finally started<br />

drilling the remaining 130 metres of the<br />

pilot hole in early February. The pilot<br />

hole intersect was successfully completed<br />

on 14 February 2009. A slight<br />

correction to the steering in the pilot hole<br />

was successfully performed prior to the<br />

start of reaming.<br />

The reaming operations preceded<br />

smoothly using two drilling rigs in tandem<br />

to complete the 30 inch, 42 inch and<br />

gas<br />

April 2010 - <strong>Trenchless</strong> <strong>International</strong><br />

38<br />

39

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!