26.04.2014 Views

Recruitment and Selection – the Great Neglected ... - Cardiff University

Recruitment and Selection – the Great Neglected ... - Cardiff University

Recruitment and Selection – the Great Neglected ... - Cardiff University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

part founded on a very optimistic (knowledge-driven economy based) reading of what<br />

is happening to <strong>the</strong> nature of many lower level occupations <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> jobs <strong>the</strong>rein.<br />

Moreover Parry <strong>and</strong> Tyson (2008) suggest that <strong>the</strong>re was little real increase in <strong>the</strong><br />

number of organisations using electronic recruitment media between 2002 <strong>and</strong> 2006,<br />

<strong>and</strong> that such techniques tend to offer a supplement to, ra<strong>the</strong>r than a replacement of,<br />

more traditional methods <strong>and</strong> channels.<br />

Organisations’ Choice of Approach to R&S<br />

We know relatively little on a systematic basis about how or why organisations<br />

choose to use different combinations of <strong>the</strong>se strategies, or what thinking underlies<br />

<strong>the</strong> placing of greater reliance on particular signifiers ra<strong>the</strong>r than o<strong>the</strong>rs, though some<br />

of <strong>the</strong> results reported in <strong>the</strong> LSC study of recruitment <strong>and</strong> training in large firms<br />

(LSC, 2008) offers some pointers that are worthy of fur<strong>the</strong>r exploratory research,<br />

particularly among small <strong>and</strong> medium sized organisations. The one powerful<br />

exception here is research on firms’ use of selection <strong>and</strong> psychometric tests (see<br />

Jenkins, 2001; Jenkins <strong>and</strong> Wolf, 2002). To very briefly summarise <strong>the</strong>ir findings, <strong>the</strong><br />

use of such tests was found to correlate with <strong>the</strong> degree of formalisation of procedures<br />

within <strong>the</strong> workplace, with managerial <strong>and</strong> professional vacancies, <strong>and</strong> with jobs<br />

where <strong>the</strong>re were high levels of off-<strong>the</strong>-job training (Jenkins <strong>and</strong> Wolf, 2002: 23).<br />

WERS suggests that personality tests are now being routinely used for some<br />

occupations in 19 per cent of workplaces, <strong>and</strong> performance tests are being used in<br />

R&S in 46 per cent of workplaces (Kersley et al, 2006:75-78). Personality testing<br />

seems to be concentrated in larger workplaces (often those with specialist human<br />

resource staff) <strong>and</strong> used upon professional, managerial, <strong>and</strong> sales staff; <strong>and</strong><br />

performance testing concentrated again in larger workplaces but used for professional<br />

<strong>and</strong> administrative staff. Among <strong>the</strong> sample of large employers surveyed by <strong>the</strong> LSC<br />

(2008:33-35), <strong>the</strong> overall relative ranking of importance of different skill/suitability<br />

assessment methods was as follows:<br />

1. Interview<br />

2. Work experience<br />

3. Performance/competency test<br />

4. Qualifications<br />

5. Assessment centre<br />

6. Personality/aptitude test<br />

16

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!