30.04.2014 Views

Crime Committee Report e.indd - New York State Senate

Crime Committee Report e.indd - New York State Senate

Crime Committee Report e.indd - New York State Senate

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

The landmark Family Protection and Domestic Violence Intervention Act of 1994 created<br />

a framework to promote a more aggressive response to domestic violence. A statewide computerized<br />

registry was established to expedite communication between Family and Criminal<br />

Courts and law enforcement agencies. Only orders of protection for domestic violence offenses<br />

covered under the statutory definition of family offense, however, are put on the registry. At<br />

least half of the victims of domestic violence are persons outside the statutory definition of<br />

family. Orders of protection and temporary orders of protection issued to protect these victims,<br />

now covered under the 2008 legislation which expanded access to Family Court, should also be<br />

included on the computerized statewide registry.<br />

S.5517 HASSELL-THOMPSON<br />

Commitment Documents<br />

This bill would correct and clarify inconsistent and ambiguous provisions in the Criminal<br />

Procedure Law and the Correction Law pertaining to the timing of the sentencing court’s<br />

obligation to provide state and local correctional facilities and OCFS facilities with commitment<br />

documents, orders of protection and sentencing minutes. It also would make technical<br />

corrections to the statutes to reflect the proper name of the commitment documents that are<br />

used today. First, Criminal Procedure Law § 380.60 identifies a “certificate of conviction” as the<br />

legal document that confers the authority for the execution of sentence and serves as the order<br />

of commitment. In actuality, the technical title of the commitment document is a “sentence<br />

and commitment.” As such, it is appropriate that this section of law, as well as a comparable<br />

provision in Correction Law § 601(a), be amended to include the title of the document that is<br />

routinely used.<br />

Second, Criminal Procedure Law § 380.70 provides that in any case where a person receives<br />

either a determinate or indeterminate sentence of imprisonment, the sentencing minutes must<br />

be transcribed and separately sent to the institution to which the defendant has been delivered<br />

within 30 days of the pronouncement of sentence.<br />

As part of the Sentencing Reform Act of 1995, the Legislature determined that the commitment<br />

document that accompanies an offender to his or her place of incarceration should<br />

contain greater specificity with regard to the crime of commitment. Specifically, it was determined<br />

that the commitment should also indicate, to the extent applicable, the subdivision,<br />

paragraph and subparagraph of the penal law or other statute under which the defendant was<br />

convicted. However, when the Legislature adopted this new requirement in 1995, the provision<br />

was mistakenly inserted into section 380.70, the same section of law that deals with sentencing<br />

minutes. This creates the misimpression that a commitment, like the sentencing minutes, may<br />

be separately delivered to the facility, even though Correction Law § 601(a) and Criminal Procedure<br />

Law § 380.60 make it clear that the commitment document must accompany the defendant<br />

when he or she is delivered to the institution to commence serving his or her sentence of<br />

imprisonment. This error was continued when the law was subsequently expanded to require<br />

orders of protection to be delivered to the institution with a defendant.<br />

The new section of law that explicitly describes the documents that must accompany a defendant<br />

when he or she is delivered to an institution to commence serving a sentence of imprisonment<br />

will clarify the confusion that is caused by the existing, inconsistent statutory language.<br />

This will help to ensure that state and local correctional facilities have the necessary documentation<br />

when receiving offenders into their custody, including documents providing such basic<br />

information as the term of the inmate’s sentence and whether multiple sentences run consecutively<br />

or concurrently.<br />

At the same time, maintaining a separate section of law requiring that courts subsequently<br />

send the sentencing minutes to the facility should help to clarify the courts’ continuing obligations<br />

after a defendant has been sentenced. These minutes assist DOCS and the Division of Parole<br />

with programming and release decisions. They provide additional background about the<br />

70<br />

<strong>New</strong> <strong>York</strong> <strong>State</strong> <strong>Senate</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!