02.05.2014 Views

report - Oceans Beyond Piracy

report - Oceans Beyond Piracy

report - Oceans Beyond Piracy

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

THE ECONOMIC COST OF SOMALI PIRACY, 2012<br />

What follows is a brief summary of the findings from each of the nine cost categories considered:<br />

• Ransoms and Recovery: In 2012, OBP estimates that $31.75 million dollars in ransoms were paid to<br />

Somali pirates. This represents an 80.1% decline in ransoms paid from 2011, when $159.62 million<br />

was paid. The reduction in ransoms is due to the lower number of vessels captured and released in<br />

2012, as well as a lower average ransom than the previous year. In addition to the ransom payment<br />

itself, the logistical costs associated with paying ransoms and recovering the vessels – including the<br />

cost of delivering the ransom, damage caused to the vessel while it is held, and the cost of negotiators,<br />

consultants and attorneys’ fees – were estimated at 100% of the value of the ransoms themselves,<br />

bringing the total cost attributable to the payment of ransoms and recovery of vessels to $63.5 million<br />

in 2012.<br />

• Military Operations: The incremental cost of vessel deployments (including reconnaissance aircraft<br />

and Unmanned Aerial Vehicles), vessel protection detachments, the administrative budgets of naval<br />

operations, and SHADE (Shared Awareness and Deconfliction) meetings amounted to $1.09 billion in<br />

2012. This figure represents a 14% decrease from the $1.27 billion <strong>report</strong>ed in 2011. However, most of<br />

the decrease comes as a result of a more conservative methodology used to calculate the cost of UAV<br />

deployments. Operationally, the major change that took place between 2011 and 2012 is a decrease<br />

in naval assets deployed by the “big three” naval missions – EUNAVFOR’s Operation Atalanta, NATO’s<br />

Operation Ocean Shield, and the Combined Task Force’s CTF-151 – alongside a corresponding increase in<br />

the assets provided by “independent deployers” including China, India, Japan, Russia, and South Korea.<br />

• Security equipment and guards: The total cost of security equipment and guards in 2012 was estimated<br />

to fall within the range of $1.65 and $2.06 billion. The cost of security equipment fell a moderate 11%,<br />

from around $578.7 million in 2011 to $514.6 million in 2012. Because of a greater acceptance of armed<br />

guards by both Flag States and ship owners and operators, the cost of armed guards rose much more<br />

dramatically, up 79.7% from 2011 to 2012 when keeping the number of annual transits through the<br />

Indian Ocean constant. However, our revised estimate of annual transits resulted in a more dramatic<br />

increase, with between $1.15 and $1.53 billion spent on armed guards alone in 2012.<br />

• Re-routing: Shipping companies spent $290.5 million re-routing along the Arabian Peninsula and Indian<br />

coast as opposed to taking a direct route through the HRA. While Best Management Practices still<br />

recommends that vessels re-route, it appears as though fewer ship owners and operators are actually<br />

doing so. The sum spent on re-routing is down 47.9% from the amount estimated in 2011. However, the<br />

proportion of ships transiting around the Horn of Africa that chose to re-route only dropped by 10%. The<br />

rest of the reduction is the result of a change in methodology, whereby fewer tankers and bulk carriers<br />

were considered to be candidates for re-routing.<br />

• Increased speed: In 2012, OBP estimates that shipping companies spent an extra $1.53 billion on fuel<br />

costs associated with steaming at faster than optimal speeds in order to prevent pirate attacks. While<br />

there was no change in the industry’s recommendations for increased speed through the HRA, the<br />

estimated cost of this practice dropped 43.3% from 2011, where the estimated additional cost was $2.7<br />

billion. This $1.17 billion decrease is the largest in absolute terms of all nine cost sections considered,<br />

and is the result of a reduction in the proportion of ships going through the High Risk Area at increased<br />

speed and a drop in the average speed of those ships steaming at faster than optimal speeds. To<br />

calculate the cost of increased speed for 2012, and to confirm the drop in compliance, OBP utilized<br />

satellite Automatic Information System (AIS) data provided by ExactEarth and licensed to OBP for use in<br />

this <strong>report</strong>.<br />

• Labor: The labor-related costs attributable to maritime piracy include the cost of hazard pay as well<br />

as the cost of paying seafarers while a vessel is being held hostage. Hazard pay is associated with the<br />

©2013<br />

3<br />

a project of One Earth Future Foundation

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!