You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
THE ECONOMIC COST OF SOMALI PIRACY, 2012<br />
What follows is a brief summary of the findings from each of the nine cost categories considered:<br />
• Ransoms and Recovery: In 2012, OBP estimates that $31.75 million dollars in ransoms were paid to<br />
Somali pirates. This represents an 80.1% decline in ransoms paid from 2011, when $159.62 million<br />
was paid. The reduction in ransoms is due to the lower number of vessels captured and released in<br />
2012, as well as a lower average ransom than the previous year. In addition to the ransom payment<br />
itself, the logistical costs associated with paying ransoms and recovering the vessels – including the<br />
cost of delivering the ransom, damage caused to the vessel while it is held, and the cost of negotiators,<br />
consultants and attorneys’ fees – were estimated at 100% of the value of the ransoms themselves,<br />
bringing the total cost attributable to the payment of ransoms and recovery of vessels to $63.5 million<br />
in 2012.<br />
• Military Operations: The incremental cost of vessel deployments (including reconnaissance aircraft<br />
and Unmanned Aerial Vehicles), vessel protection detachments, the administrative budgets of naval<br />
operations, and SHADE (Shared Awareness and Deconfliction) meetings amounted to $1.09 billion in<br />
2012. This figure represents a 14% decrease from the $1.27 billion <strong>report</strong>ed in 2011. However, most of<br />
the decrease comes as a result of a more conservative methodology used to calculate the cost of UAV<br />
deployments. Operationally, the major change that took place between 2011 and 2012 is a decrease<br />
in naval assets deployed by the “big three” naval missions – EUNAVFOR’s Operation Atalanta, NATO’s<br />
Operation Ocean Shield, and the Combined Task Force’s CTF-151 – alongside a corresponding increase in<br />
the assets provided by “independent deployers” including China, India, Japan, Russia, and South Korea.<br />
• Security equipment and guards: The total cost of security equipment and guards in 2012 was estimated<br />
to fall within the range of $1.65 and $2.06 billion. The cost of security equipment fell a moderate 11%,<br />
from around $578.7 million in 2011 to $514.6 million in 2012. Because of a greater acceptance of armed<br />
guards by both Flag States and ship owners and operators, the cost of armed guards rose much more<br />
dramatically, up 79.7% from 2011 to 2012 when keeping the number of annual transits through the<br />
Indian Ocean constant. However, our revised estimate of annual transits resulted in a more dramatic<br />
increase, with between $1.15 and $1.53 billion spent on armed guards alone in 2012.<br />
• Re-routing: Shipping companies spent $290.5 million re-routing along the Arabian Peninsula and Indian<br />
coast as opposed to taking a direct route through the HRA. While Best Management Practices still<br />
recommends that vessels re-route, it appears as though fewer ship owners and operators are actually<br />
doing so. The sum spent on re-routing is down 47.9% from the amount estimated in 2011. However, the<br />
proportion of ships transiting around the Horn of Africa that chose to re-route only dropped by 10%. The<br />
rest of the reduction is the result of a change in methodology, whereby fewer tankers and bulk carriers<br />
were considered to be candidates for re-routing.<br />
• Increased speed: In 2012, OBP estimates that shipping companies spent an extra $1.53 billion on fuel<br />
costs associated with steaming at faster than optimal speeds in order to prevent pirate attacks. While<br />
there was no change in the industry’s recommendations for increased speed through the HRA, the<br />
estimated cost of this practice dropped 43.3% from 2011, where the estimated additional cost was $2.7<br />
billion. This $1.17 billion decrease is the largest in absolute terms of all nine cost sections considered,<br />
and is the result of a reduction in the proportion of ships going through the High Risk Area at increased<br />
speed and a drop in the average speed of those ships steaming at faster than optimal speeds. To<br />
calculate the cost of increased speed for 2012, and to confirm the drop in compliance, OBP utilized<br />
satellite Automatic Information System (AIS) data provided by ExactEarth and licensed to OBP for use in<br />
this <strong>report</strong>.<br />
• Labor: The labor-related costs attributable to maritime piracy include the cost of hazard pay as well<br />
as the cost of paying seafarers while a vessel is being held hostage. Hazard pay is associated with the<br />
©2013<br />
3<br />
a project of One Earth Future Foundation