Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
THE ECONOMIC COST OF SOMALI PIRACY, 2012<br />
8.17%, and 22.91% between 2011 and 2012. Both of these factors put upward pressure on the cost of piracyrelated<br />
insurance. This upward pressure was more than offset by discounts related to the increased use of PCASP.<br />
In fact, after controlling for the changes in the composition of merchant vessels in the HRA, the decrease in<br />
insurance costs between 2011 and 2012 would be a full 14.9%, as opposed to the 13.3% reduction observed. 129<br />
The cost of piracy-related insurance represents a welcome decrease from 2011. This is despite an increase in<br />
the estimated value of the insured property in the HRA. The overall decline is due primarily in the increased use<br />
of PCASP aboard merchant vessels. If the downward trend in <strong>report</strong>ed attempts and hijackings continues, we<br />
should expect the piracy-related insurance costs to continue decreasing in the future. 130<br />
Costs not included: The cost of hull insurance is not included in the section on piracy-related insurance because<br />
hull insurance is considered to be a normal cost of the shipping industry. Depending on the specific policy in<br />
question, piracy may have a direct effect on hull insurance premiums. However, OBP was not able to conclusively<br />
discern what proportion of any given hull insurance premium is directly attributable to piracy risk.<br />
9. The Cost of Counter-<strong>Piracy</strong> Organizations<br />
In addition to the funds contributed directly by governments and industry, several<br />
counter-piracy organizations devote some or all of their budgets to the fight against<br />
maritime piracy. Some of these organizations are IGOs performing their official<br />
duties and others are NGOs playing a more informal role, but all of them provide<br />
valuable input to the global effort against piracy, and all of them incur costs while<br />
doing so. This section describes the missions of each counter-piracy organization,<br />
notes relevant developments in 2012, and estimates the annual total spent on<br />
each organization.<br />
Total Cost of<br />
Counter-<strong>Piracy</strong><br />
Organizations<br />
2012<br />
A. Trust Fund to Support Initiatives of States to Counter <strong>Piracy</strong> off<br />
the Coast of Somalia (“Trust Fund”)<br />
Total Contribution to the Trust Fund, 2012: $5.83 million<br />
Germany<br />
Italy<br />
$2.5 million<br />
Qatar<br />
Spain<br />
Japan<br />
$2 million<br />
UAE<br />
$1 million<br />
Norway ~$333,333<br />
$24.08<br />
Million<br />
With a mandate from the forty-six member states comprising the Contact Group on <strong>Piracy</strong> off the Coast of<br />
Somalia (CGPCS), the Trust Fund was established on January 27, 2010 by the United Nations Secretary General,<br />
Ban Ki Moon. The Trust Fund has supported the initiatives of three United Nations entities, namely the United<br />
Nations Development Programme (UNDP), United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC) and the United<br />
Nations Political Office for Somalia (UNPOS). The objective of the Fund is to “help defray the expenses associated<br />
with prosecution of suspected pirates, as well as other activities related to implementing the Contact Group’s<br />
objectives regarding combating piracy in all its aspects.” 131 At the CGPCS 13 th Plenary Session, participants noted<br />
that while there has been a reduction in the number of attacks and hijackings in 2012, the underlying causes<br />
of piracy remain in place. Because the gains made are both fragile and reversible, CGPCS stakeholders noted,<br />
ongoing funding and operational support will be necessary. 132<br />
a project of One Earth Future Foundation ©2013<br />
34