02.05.2014 Views

Download the report in pdf format - OECD Nuclear Energy Agency

Download the report in pdf format - OECD Nuclear Energy Agency

Download the report in pdf format - OECD Nuclear Energy Agency

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Nuclear</strong> or Radiological Emergency, GS-R-2, should be<br />

updated. The NEA, as a co-sponsor of GS-R-2, agreed<br />

to participate <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> updat<strong>in</strong>g of <strong>the</strong> document with<br />

a view to co-sponsor<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> new version.<br />

The CRPPH also cont<strong>in</strong>ued its efforts to provide<br />

<strong>the</strong> ICRP with practical user feedback on draft documents,<br />

analys<strong>in</strong>g a new draft ICRP recommendation<br />

on Radiological Protection <strong>in</strong> Geological Disposal of<br />

Long-lived Solid Radioactive Waste, <strong>in</strong> co-operation<br />

with <strong>the</strong> NEA Radioactive Waste Management<br />

Committee (RWMC). The NEA will publish, jo<strong>in</strong>tly<br />

with <strong>the</strong> ICRP, a flyer briefly summaris<strong>in</strong>g this ICRP<br />

recommendation <strong>in</strong> pla<strong>in</strong> language, <strong>in</strong> particular to<br />

facilitate <strong>the</strong> explanation of <strong>the</strong>se somewhat complex<br />

concepts to a more general public.<br />

Radiological protection science and<br />

policy judgment<br />

Radiological protection decisions are a comb<strong>in</strong>ation<br />

of science and judgment, and mak<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>se<br />

two elements more transparent <strong>in</strong> decision mak<strong>in</strong>g<br />

will most likely improve <strong>the</strong> acceptability and<br />

susta<strong>in</strong>ability of decisions. The CRPPH is address<strong>in</strong>g<br />

<strong>the</strong>se issues through a series of science and<br />

values workshops, <strong>the</strong> first two hav<strong>in</strong>g been held <strong>in</strong><br />

2008 and 2009. The third workshop on Science and<br />

Values <strong>in</strong> Radiological Protection was held <strong>in</strong> Japan<br />

<strong>in</strong> November 2012. Fur<strong>the</strong>r details on this workshop<br />

can be found on page 50 <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> section on <strong>Nuclear</strong><br />

<strong>Energy</strong> and Civil Society.<br />

Operational radiological protection from<br />

a policy perspective<br />

The CRPPH Expert Group on Occupational Exposure<br />

(EGOE) prepared a <strong>report</strong> on <strong>the</strong> management of<br />

total risk and on radiological protection aspects of<br />

transient worker exposure management. The EGOE<br />

met <strong>in</strong> January and October 2012 to f<strong>in</strong>alise <strong>the</strong> draft<br />

<strong>report</strong>, which will be submitted to <strong>the</strong> CRPPH for<br />

approval <strong>in</strong> May 2013.<br />

The CRPPH Expert Group on Best Available<br />

Techniques (EGBAT) completed most of its work<br />

dur<strong>in</strong>g 2012, hold<strong>in</strong>g a workshop on Good Practice<br />

<strong>in</strong> Effluent Management <strong>in</strong> January. As a result of <strong>the</strong><br />

workshop, a series of questions regard<strong>in</strong>g approaches<br />

to good practice were generated and turned <strong>in</strong>to<br />

a questionnaire for participants. Questionnaire<br />

responses will be used to f<strong>in</strong>alise <strong>the</strong> draft expert<br />

group <strong>report</strong> on good practice <strong>in</strong> effluent management<br />

for nuclear power plant new build, due to be<br />

issued <strong>in</strong> late 2013.<br />

expert group of <strong>the</strong> Work<strong>in</strong>g Party on <strong>Nuclear</strong><br />

Emergency Matters (WPNEM) is prepar<strong>in</strong>g a <strong>report</strong><br />

on <strong>the</strong> evolution of national emergency management<br />

programmes <strong>in</strong> response to <strong>the</strong> new ICRP recommendations<br />

which should be issued <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> first half<br />

of 2013. Also <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> area of emergency management<br />

implementation, <strong>in</strong> early 2013 <strong>the</strong> WPNEM will complete<br />

<strong>the</strong> update of its 2003 <strong>report</strong> on short-term<br />

countermeasure criteria currently used by NEA<br />

member countries.<br />

The INEX-4 exercise, which was undertaken<br />

<strong>in</strong> 2011-2012 by 17 countries (<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g 4 non-NEA<br />

countries), focused on consequence management<br />

and transition to recovery <strong>in</strong> response to malicious<br />

acts <strong>in</strong>volv<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> release of radioactive materials<br />

<strong>in</strong> an urban sett<strong>in</strong>g. The exercise summary <strong>report</strong><br />

was completed and submitted to <strong>the</strong> CRPPH Work<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Party on <strong>Nuclear</strong> Emergency Matters for approval at<br />

its November 2012 meet<strong>in</strong>g. The <strong>report</strong> will be f<strong>in</strong>alised<br />

with a jo<strong>in</strong>t topical session with <strong>the</strong> CRPPH on<br />

INEX-4 results <strong>in</strong> May 2013.<br />

INEX-4 exercise<br />

Comprehensive problem identification.<br />

Occupational exposure at nuclear<br />

power plants<br />

The shar<strong>in</strong>g of operational lessons and experience,<br />

as well as <strong>the</strong> collection, analysis and exchange of<br />

occupational exposure data cont<strong>in</strong>ue to be addressed<br />

by <strong>the</strong> In<strong>format</strong>ion System on Occupational<br />

Exposure (ISOE), an NEA jo<strong>in</strong>t project <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> field of<br />

radiological protection which is co-sponsored by <strong>the</strong><br />

IAEA. In 2012, <strong>the</strong> ISOE cont<strong>in</strong>ued its efforts to share<br />

dose reduction experience among participants, and<br />

to co-ord<strong>in</strong>ate projects to improve optimisation of<br />

worker radiological protection at nuclear power<br />

plants by provid<strong>in</strong>g onl<strong>in</strong>e data collection and<br />

detailed analysis of data through its MADRAS<br />

module. Fur<strong>the</strong>r details on <strong>the</strong> ISOE programme are<br />

provided on page 42.<br />

<strong>Nuclear</strong> emergency and recovery<br />

management<br />

In terms of system evolution, <strong>the</strong> CRPPH agreed to<br />

<strong>in</strong>vestigate how <strong>the</strong> new ICRP recommendations<br />

for emergency management and for post-accident<br />

rehabilitation were be<strong>in</strong>g implemented, with a view<br />

to assist members <strong>in</strong> updat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>ir own approaches<br />

and to provide practical feedback to <strong>the</strong> ICRP. An<br />

Contact:<br />

Michael Siemann<br />

Head, Radiological Protection and<br />

Radioactive Waste Management<br />

Division<br />

+33 (0)1 45 24 10 40<br />

michael.siemann@oecd.org<br />

NEA Annual Report 2012<br />

27

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!