Download the report in pdf format - OECD Nuclear Energy Agency
Download the report in pdf format - OECD Nuclear Energy Agency
Download the report in pdf format - OECD Nuclear Energy Agency
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>Nuclear</strong> or Radiological Emergency, GS-R-2, should be<br />
updated. The NEA, as a co-sponsor of GS-R-2, agreed<br />
to participate <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> updat<strong>in</strong>g of <strong>the</strong> document with<br />
a view to co-sponsor<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> new version.<br />
The CRPPH also cont<strong>in</strong>ued its efforts to provide<br />
<strong>the</strong> ICRP with practical user feedback on draft documents,<br />
analys<strong>in</strong>g a new draft ICRP recommendation<br />
on Radiological Protection <strong>in</strong> Geological Disposal of<br />
Long-lived Solid Radioactive Waste, <strong>in</strong> co-operation<br />
with <strong>the</strong> NEA Radioactive Waste Management<br />
Committee (RWMC). The NEA will publish, jo<strong>in</strong>tly<br />
with <strong>the</strong> ICRP, a flyer briefly summaris<strong>in</strong>g this ICRP<br />
recommendation <strong>in</strong> pla<strong>in</strong> language, <strong>in</strong> particular to<br />
facilitate <strong>the</strong> explanation of <strong>the</strong>se somewhat complex<br />
concepts to a more general public.<br />
Radiological protection science and<br />
policy judgment<br />
Radiological protection decisions are a comb<strong>in</strong>ation<br />
of science and judgment, and mak<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>se<br />
two elements more transparent <strong>in</strong> decision mak<strong>in</strong>g<br />
will most likely improve <strong>the</strong> acceptability and<br />
susta<strong>in</strong>ability of decisions. The CRPPH is address<strong>in</strong>g<br />
<strong>the</strong>se issues through a series of science and<br />
values workshops, <strong>the</strong> first two hav<strong>in</strong>g been held <strong>in</strong><br />
2008 and 2009. The third workshop on Science and<br />
Values <strong>in</strong> Radiological Protection was held <strong>in</strong> Japan<br />
<strong>in</strong> November 2012. Fur<strong>the</strong>r details on this workshop<br />
can be found on page 50 <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> section on <strong>Nuclear</strong><br />
<strong>Energy</strong> and Civil Society.<br />
Operational radiological protection from<br />
a policy perspective<br />
The CRPPH Expert Group on Occupational Exposure<br />
(EGOE) prepared a <strong>report</strong> on <strong>the</strong> management of<br />
total risk and on radiological protection aspects of<br />
transient worker exposure management. The EGOE<br />
met <strong>in</strong> January and October 2012 to f<strong>in</strong>alise <strong>the</strong> draft<br />
<strong>report</strong>, which will be submitted to <strong>the</strong> CRPPH for<br />
approval <strong>in</strong> May 2013.<br />
The CRPPH Expert Group on Best Available<br />
Techniques (EGBAT) completed most of its work<br />
dur<strong>in</strong>g 2012, hold<strong>in</strong>g a workshop on Good Practice<br />
<strong>in</strong> Effluent Management <strong>in</strong> January. As a result of <strong>the</strong><br />
workshop, a series of questions regard<strong>in</strong>g approaches<br />
to good practice were generated and turned <strong>in</strong>to<br />
a questionnaire for participants. Questionnaire<br />
responses will be used to f<strong>in</strong>alise <strong>the</strong> draft expert<br />
group <strong>report</strong> on good practice <strong>in</strong> effluent management<br />
for nuclear power plant new build, due to be<br />
issued <strong>in</strong> late 2013.<br />
expert group of <strong>the</strong> Work<strong>in</strong>g Party on <strong>Nuclear</strong><br />
Emergency Matters (WPNEM) is prepar<strong>in</strong>g a <strong>report</strong><br />
on <strong>the</strong> evolution of national emergency management<br />
programmes <strong>in</strong> response to <strong>the</strong> new ICRP recommendations<br />
which should be issued <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> first half<br />
of 2013. Also <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> area of emergency management<br />
implementation, <strong>in</strong> early 2013 <strong>the</strong> WPNEM will complete<br />
<strong>the</strong> update of its 2003 <strong>report</strong> on short-term<br />
countermeasure criteria currently used by NEA<br />
member countries.<br />
The INEX-4 exercise, which was undertaken<br />
<strong>in</strong> 2011-2012 by 17 countries (<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g 4 non-NEA<br />
countries), focused on consequence management<br />
and transition to recovery <strong>in</strong> response to malicious<br />
acts <strong>in</strong>volv<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> release of radioactive materials<br />
<strong>in</strong> an urban sett<strong>in</strong>g. The exercise summary <strong>report</strong><br />
was completed and submitted to <strong>the</strong> CRPPH Work<strong>in</strong>g<br />
Party on <strong>Nuclear</strong> Emergency Matters for approval at<br />
its November 2012 meet<strong>in</strong>g. The <strong>report</strong> will be f<strong>in</strong>alised<br />
with a jo<strong>in</strong>t topical session with <strong>the</strong> CRPPH on<br />
INEX-4 results <strong>in</strong> May 2013.<br />
INEX-4 exercise<br />
Comprehensive problem identification.<br />
Occupational exposure at nuclear<br />
power plants<br />
The shar<strong>in</strong>g of operational lessons and experience,<br />
as well as <strong>the</strong> collection, analysis and exchange of<br />
occupational exposure data cont<strong>in</strong>ue to be addressed<br />
by <strong>the</strong> In<strong>format</strong>ion System on Occupational<br />
Exposure (ISOE), an NEA jo<strong>in</strong>t project <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> field of<br />
radiological protection which is co-sponsored by <strong>the</strong><br />
IAEA. In 2012, <strong>the</strong> ISOE cont<strong>in</strong>ued its efforts to share<br />
dose reduction experience among participants, and<br />
to co-ord<strong>in</strong>ate projects to improve optimisation of<br />
worker radiological protection at nuclear power<br />
plants by provid<strong>in</strong>g onl<strong>in</strong>e data collection and<br />
detailed analysis of data through its MADRAS<br />
module. Fur<strong>the</strong>r details on <strong>the</strong> ISOE programme are<br />
provided on page 42.<br />
<strong>Nuclear</strong> emergency and recovery<br />
management<br />
In terms of system evolution, <strong>the</strong> CRPPH agreed to<br />
<strong>in</strong>vestigate how <strong>the</strong> new ICRP recommendations<br />
for emergency management and for post-accident<br />
rehabilitation were be<strong>in</strong>g implemented, with a view<br />
to assist members <strong>in</strong> updat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>ir own approaches<br />
and to provide practical feedback to <strong>the</strong> ICRP. An<br />
Contact:<br />
Michael Siemann<br />
Head, Radiological Protection and<br />
Radioactive Waste Management<br />
Division<br />
+33 (0)1 45 24 10 40<br />
michael.siemann@oecd.org<br />
NEA Annual Report 2012<br />
27