literature review and study energy market alternatives for - Ontario ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

AGRICULTURAL BIOMASS CHALLENGES VALUE CHAIN - COMBUSTION TORREFACTION TECHNOLOGY IN FLUX IF TECHNOLOGY DOESN’T WORK, ONLY LOCAL MARKETS CAN BE SERVICED PORTABLE TORREFACTION BENEFITS: 12,500 BTU/LB – UP FROM 8,000 BTU/LB (OD) SPF – UP FROM 4,200 BTU (GREEN) 14,900 BTU/LB – UP FROM 10,100BTU/LB (OD) SOUTHERN YELLOW PINE PORTABLE TECHNOLOGY SIGNIFICANTLY BETTER THAN OTHERS (EXAMPLES): 12,500 BTU/LB VS 9,000 BTU/LB (ENERGEX), 10,400 BTU/LB EUROPEAN 1% MOISTURE (TORREFIED) VS 5 – 8% 90 SEC PROCESS TIME VS 20 – 30 MINUTES CONSUMES ONLY VOC’S VS 10 – 25% NATURAL GAS SUPPLEMENTATION LOWER BIOMASS LOSS – 1.20 T(OD) YIELDS 1 T(OD) VS 3 T(OD) YIELDS 1T(OD), OR 2.4T (GREEN) : 1T (TORREFIED) VS 6 T(GREEN) : 1 T (TORREFIED) Source: Southern Biomass/Terradyne
AGRICULTURAL BIOMASS CHALLENGES VALUE CHAIN - COMBUSTION CROP RESIDUE CONTRACTS - REVENUE AND EXPENSE CONSIDERATIONS (1) REVENUES: ABENGOA CONTRACT SPECIFICATIONS (KANSAS/OKLAHOMA) : ANNUAL BASE CONTRACT PAYMENT - $2.50/A ANNUAL BIOMASS RESERVATION PAYMENT - $0.50/T PAYMENT FOR BIOMASS REMOVED - $5/T CROP NUTRIENT REMOVAL COMPENSATION - $8/T SIGN -UP BONUS - $1/A IN-FIELD STORAGE - SITE RENTAL - $/A BCAP PAYMENTS (USDA BIOMASS CROP ASSISTANCE) - $ MATCHES PAYMENTS UP TO $45/T OVER CONTRACT LIFE OTHER INCENTIVES - $ Source: Wooley, R. Abengoa Bio<strong>energy</strong>: Commercial Scale Biorefinery - Hugoton, KS, Biomass Technical Advisory Committee Meeting - September 29, 2010
Page 1 and 2:
LITERATURE REVIEW AND STUDY ENERGY
Page 3 and 4:
AGRICULTURAL BIOMASS - COMBUSTION V
Page 5 and 6:
INTRODUCTION The study was intended
Page 7 and 8:
SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS (1) WHILE T
Page 9 and 10:
SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS (3) THERE I
Page 11 and 12:
RECOMMENDATIONS (2) • INDUSTRIAL
Page 13 and 14:
AGRICULTURAL BIOMASS POWER CHALLENG
Page 15 and 16:
Page 17 and 18:
Page 19 and 20:
AGRICULTURE BIOMASS POWER CHALLENGE
Page 21 and 22:
Source EIA AGRICULTURE BIOMASS POWE
Page 23 and 24:
AGRICULTURE BIOMASS POWER CHALLENGE
Page 25 and 26: AGRICULTURE BIOMASS POWER CHALLENGE
Page 27 and 28: AGRICULTURE BIOMASS POWER CHALLENGE
Page 29 and 30: AGRICULTURAL BIOMASS POWER CHALLENG
Page 33 and 34: AGRICULTURAL BIOMASS FEEDSTOCK DEVE
Page 47 and 48: BIOMASS CROP VARIETY DEVELOPMENT FE
Page 49 and 50: AGRICULTURAL BIOMASS COMBUSTION VAL
Page 51 and 52: AGRICULTURAL BIOMASS CHALLENGES VAL
Page 75: AGRICULTURAL BIOMASS CHALLENGES VAL
Page 81 and 82: Fermentation LOW HIGH AGRICULTURAL
Page 83 and 84: AGRICULTURAL BIO-REFINERY CONCEPT L
Page 85 and 86: AGRICULTURAL BIO-REFINERY CONCEPT B
Page 87 and 88: AGRICULTURAL BIO-REFINERY CONCEPT B
Page 89 and 90: RURAL BIO-REFINERY CONCEPT GROW LOC
Page 91 and 92: RURAL BIO-REFINERY CONCEPT POTENTIA
Page 93 and 94: RURAL BIO-REFINERY CONCEPT ANAEROBI
Page 95 and 96: RURAL BIO-REFINERY CONCEPT BIOGAS A
Page 105 and 106: RURAL BIOREFINERY CONCEPT BIOGAS AN
Page 111 and 112: RURAL BIO-REFINERY CONCEPT RURAL EC
Page 127 and 128:
AGRICULTURAL BIO-REFINERY CHALLENGE
Page 129 and 130:
Page 131 and 132:
Page 133 and 134:
BIOMASS BIO-REFINERY CHALLENGES POL
Page 135 and 136:
Page 137 and 138:
Baxter, Larry, and Jaap Kopperjan.
Page 139 and 140:
Cushion, Elizabeth, Gerhard Dieterl
Page 141 and 142:
Grubert, E, and S Kitasei. "How Ene
Page 143 and 144:
Kurtz, B, "Bloom Energy to Offer El
Page 145 and 146:
NOVA (Northern Ontario Value Added
Page 147 and 148:
Sipila, E., Vasara, P., Sipil?§, K
Page 149:
Wilson, T O. "Factors Affecting Woo
show all

literature review and study energy market alternatives for - Ontario ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?