Management Reports Issued (continued) - Office of Inspector ...
Management Reports Issued (continued) - Office of Inspector ...
Management Reports Issued (continued) - Office of Inspector ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
April 1, 2012 – September 30, 2012<br />
Semiannual Report to the Congress<br />
Under the <strong>Inspector</strong> General Act, we review<br />
and comment on existing and proposed<br />
legislation and regulations affecting DHS<br />
programs and operations to foster economy and<br />
effciency, and detect fraud, waste, and abuse.<br />
We also participated on the Council <strong>of</strong> <strong>Inspector</strong>s<br />
General on Integrity and Effciency (CIGIE),<br />
which provides a means to comment on existing<br />
and proposed legislation and regulations that have<br />
government-wide impact and will participate in<br />
DHS’ Regulatory Affairs <strong>Management</strong> System<br />
(RAMS) Pilot Program Training.<br />
During this reporting period, we reviewed more<br />
than 100 legislative and regulatory proposals, draft<br />
DHS policy directives, and other matters. For<br />
example, we reviewed and provided comments<br />
to the DHS management on two matters<br />
summarized below.<br />
DHS Delegation No. 19003 to the Offcer for<br />
Civil Rights and Civil Liberties (CRCL) for<br />
Matters Involving Civil Rights and Civil Liberties,<br />
including Equal Employment Opportunity and<br />
Workforce Diversity<br />
We commented that nothing in this delegation is<br />
intended to interfere with the statutory independence<br />
<strong>of</strong> the <strong>Inspector</strong> General or the <strong>Inspector</strong><br />
General’s authority to investigate allegations <strong>of</strong><br />
misconduct, including allegations <strong>of</strong> civil rights<br />
or civil liberties abuses, by DHS employees or<br />
contractors.<br />
Under the <strong>Inspector</strong> General Act 6 U.S.C. § 345;<br />
and 42 U.S.C. § 2000ee-1, CRCL’s authority<br />
to investigate allegations <strong>of</strong> civil rights and civil<br />
liberties abuses by DHS employees and contractors<br />
is subject to OIG’s right <strong>of</strong> first refusal to investigate<br />
such allegations. The suggested language<br />
makes this point clear in the delegation.<br />
The Department’s Executive Offce and<br />
Delegation Task Force accepted our comments<br />
and recommended the Department Secretary’s<br />
approval and signature.<br />
DHS Directive No. 041-042: International<br />
Affairs<br />
The Directive sets forth the delegated authority,<br />
policy, authorities, and responsibilities for<br />
planning, coordinating, and managing international<br />
affairs for the DHS. It is designed<br />
to facilitate the Secretary’s leadership and<br />
management <strong>of</strong> the Department’s activities<br />
involving international affairs and does not<br />
interfere with or inhibit the Offce <strong>of</strong> <strong>Inspector</strong><br />
General’s statutory authority. We commented<br />
that Page 1, Section II.C.5. should be deleted and<br />
replaced with the following language, “Interfere<br />
with or inhibit the Offce <strong>of</strong> <strong>Inspector</strong> General’s<br />
statutory authority.” The Department accepted<br />
our comments, and the Department Secretary<br />
signed the Directive on August 20, 2012.<br />
DHS <strong>Management</strong> Directive No. 110-01 and<br />
DHS Instruction No. 110-01-001: Privacy Policy<br />
for Operational Use <strong>of</strong> Social Media<br />
This Directive and Instruction were newly-issued<br />
in 2012. They establish DHS privacy policy<br />
involving DHS components’ operational use<br />
<strong>of</strong> social media. DHS OIG provided extensive<br />
comments on the proposed Directive and the<br />
accompanying Instruction on matters involving<br />
our equities as well as matters with DHS-wide<br />
implications. We emphasized the importance <strong>of</strong><br />
ensuring that the Directive and Instruction did<br />
not conflict with OIG’s statutory authority. Our<br />
request that language to this effect be added to the<br />
Directive was accepted, and this change, among<br />
others, was incorporated into the final documents.<br />
49