View Document - OSTI
View Document - OSTI
View Document - OSTI
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
12<br />
have studied the iron sulfide from iron meteorites and assumed<br />
that the concentrations of elements in the iron sulfide enclosed<br />
in the silicates were the same. There is no reason to believe<br />
that this assumption is Justified.<br />
In fact the amounts of the<br />
elements in these trollite nodules in the iron meteorites can<br />
probably be neglected in any avei^ge because they constitute<br />
such a very small fraction of the iron meteorites and hence<br />
of all meteoritic matter.<br />
Another difficulty in computing the "average" composition<br />
of the meteorites arises from our ignorance of the relative<br />
amounts of the three meteoritic main phases. The meteorites<br />
reaching the earth's surface cannot serve as a basis for an<br />
estimate of these relative amounts because iron meteorites are<br />
better preserved during their fall and on the surface of the<br />
earth than are stony meteorites and pallasites.<br />
The assumptions<br />
made by different invesigators are summarized in Table 1.<br />
TABLE I<br />
Assumptions made on the average composition of meteoritic matter<br />
by various authors<br />
Parts by Weight<br />
Author Metal Sulfide Silicate<br />
Noddack and Noddack (1930) 68 9»8 100<br />
Noddack and Noddack (1934) 14.6 6.7 100<br />
Persman (1934) 20 • 4 100<br />
Qoldschmidt (1937) 20 10 100<br />
H. Brown (I949) 67 0 100<br />
Urey (1952 a) 10.6 7 100