11.05.2014 Views

View Document - OSTI

View Document - OSTI

View Document - OSTI

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

12<br />

have studied the iron sulfide from iron meteorites and assumed<br />

that the concentrations of elements in the iron sulfide enclosed<br />

in the silicates were the same. There is no reason to believe<br />

that this assumption is Justified.<br />

In fact the amounts of the<br />

elements in these trollite nodules in the iron meteorites can<br />

probably be neglected in any avei^ge because they constitute<br />

such a very small fraction of the iron meteorites and hence<br />

of all meteoritic matter.<br />

Another difficulty in computing the "average" composition<br />

of the meteorites arises from our ignorance of the relative<br />

amounts of the three meteoritic main phases. The meteorites<br />

reaching the earth's surface cannot serve as a basis for an<br />

estimate of these relative amounts because iron meteorites are<br />

better preserved during their fall and on the surface of the<br />

earth than are stony meteorites and pallasites.<br />

The assumptions<br />

made by different invesigators are summarized in Table 1.<br />

TABLE I<br />

Assumptions made on the average composition of meteoritic matter<br />

by various authors<br />

Parts by Weight<br />

Author Metal Sulfide Silicate<br />

Noddack and Noddack (1930) 68 9»8 100<br />

Noddack and Noddack (1934) 14.6 6.7 100<br />

Persman (1934) 20 • 4 100<br />

Qoldschmidt (1937) 20 10 100<br />

H. Brown (I949) 67 0 100<br />

Urey (1952 a) 10.6 7 100

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!