11.05.2014 Views

View Document - OSTI

View Document - OSTI

View Document - OSTI

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

40<br />

than that given by Noddack (1955) is Justified.<br />

The abundances<br />

are adjusted only slightly from Minami's values in order to<br />

secure smoother curves. Table 5 compares the obsejrved and<br />

selected values both normalized to our lanthanum value.<br />

TABLE 5<br />

La cat/ Pr Nd Sm Eu<br />

Minami«s abundances 1.00 2.46 0.295 1»25 0.215 0.052<br />

Our abundances 1.00 1.13 0.20 0.72 0.324 0.093<br />

Qd Tb Dy Ho Er Tm<br />

Minami»s abundances 0.31 0.043 0.21 0.052 0.11 0.0084<br />

Our abundances 0.34 0.048 0.28 0,059 0,l6 0.0159<br />

Yb Lu<br />

Minami*8 abundances 0.12 0.032<br />

Our abundances 0,11 0.025<br />

The most serious disagreement occurs in the case of cerium.<br />

discrepancies are surely within the observational errors, but<br />

also the true curves may be less regular than we have drawn them.<br />

The abundance of hafnium was taken as<br />

A/ 1/110 that of zirconium, as discussed<br />

above, Rankama (1944, 1948} gives the maximum amount of tantalum in<br />

meteorites as 0.38 ppm^ equivalent to an atomic abundance of 0

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!