View Document - OSTI
View Document - OSTI
View Document - OSTI
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
40<br />
than that given by Noddack (1955) is Justified.<br />
The abundances<br />
are adjusted only slightly from Minami's values in order to<br />
secure smoother curves. Table 5 compares the obsejrved and<br />
selected values both normalized to our lanthanum value.<br />
TABLE 5<br />
La cat/ Pr Nd Sm Eu<br />
Minami«s abundances 1.00 2.46 0.295 1»25 0.215 0.052<br />
Our abundances 1.00 1.13 0.20 0.72 0.324 0.093<br />
Qd Tb Dy Ho Er Tm<br />
Minami»s abundances 0.31 0.043 0.21 0.052 0.11 0.0084<br />
Our abundances 0.34 0.048 0.28 0,059 0,l6 0.0159<br />
Yb Lu<br />
Minami*8 abundances 0.12 0.032<br />
Our abundances 0,11 0.025<br />
The most serious disagreement occurs in the case of cerium.<br />
discrepancies are surely within the observational errors, but<br />
also the true curves may be less regular than we have drawn them.<br />
The abundance of hafnium was taken as<br />
A/ 1/110 that of zirconium, as discussed<br />
above, Rankama (1944, 1948} gives the maximum amount of tantalum in<br />
meteorites as 0.38 ppm^ equivalent to an atomic abundance of 0