11.05.2014 Views

View Document - OSTI

View Document - OSTI

View Document - OSTI

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

18<br />

million times smaller than that of the group of the next heavier<br />

elements in the cosmos, carbon, oxygen, and nitrogen. According<br />

to Qreenstein and Richardson (195I), Li in the sun seems to be<br />

even less abundant by another factor of 100. The low abundance of<br />

these three elements can easily be understood as a consequence<br />

of their instability at high stellar temperatures and their<br />

possible thermonuclear reactions with protons. Such reactions<br />

may have occurred toward the end of the processes by which the<br />

elements were made.<br />

The analyses of igneous rocks and of meteorites for these<br />

elements are summarized by Qoldschmidt (1937)» He gives for<br />

the atomic ratios of Li and Be in the llthosphere and in silicate<br />

meteorites relative to Si equal to 10"s<br />

Li<br />

Be<br />

Llthosphere 900 67<br />

Silicate meteorites 100 20<br />

Both are concentrated to some extent by the fusion pi^ocesses that<br />

have concentrated elements in the earth's crust. For this<br />

reason smaller values than those of the meteorites. Just as in the<br />

case of K, U, and Th, might be used in our estimate of cosmic<br />

abundances. However, because of the uncertainty of analyses, no<br />

corrections have been made. Qoldschmidt estimates the atomic<br />

abundance of boron as 28. Its abundance in the earth's surface<br />

is complicated by its appreciable concentrations In the sediments<br />

and ocean waters.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!