Attachment tables only (PDF - 395 Kb)
Attachment tables only (PDF - 395 Kb)
Attachment tables only (PDF - 395 Kb)
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Table 12A.45<br />
Table 12A.45<br />
NSW Vic (c), (d) Qld (e) WA (c), (f) SA Tas ACT NT (c)<br />
Number of services assessed at level 1<br />
2003<br />
na na 37 na 12 na 13 –<br />
2004<br />
na 54 89 na 53 na 13 1<br />
2005<br />
390 55 90 20 80 15 14 1<br />
2006<br />
365 65 95 16 73 12 16 2<br />
2007<br />
431 48 101 15 79 11 16 2<br />
Number of services assessed at level 2<br />
2003<br />
na na 74 na 15 na .. –<br />
2004<br />
na – 10 na 6 na .. –<br />
2005<br />
3 – 8 4 3 – .. 1<br />
2006<br />
4 – 2 3 4 5 – –<br />
2007<br />
5 – 1 14 2 2 – –<br />
Number of specialised public mental health services<br />
2003<br />
na na 119 32 103 na 16 2<br />
2004<br />
na 54 120 31 107 na 16 2<br />
2005<br />
531 55 120 31 110 32 16 2<br />
2006<br />
468 65 121 31 116 33 16 2<br />
2007<br />
556 50 122 34 110 29 16 2<br />
Per cent of services assessed at level 1<br />
2003<br />
na na 31.1 na 11.7 na 81.3 –<br />
2004<br />
na 100.0 74.2 na 49.5 na 81.3 50.0<br />
2005<br />
73.4 100.0 75.0 64.5 72.7 46.9 87.5 50.0<br />
2006<br />
78.0 100.0 78.5 51.6 62.9 36.4 100.0 100.0<br />
2007<br />
77.5 96.0 82.8 44.1 71.8 37.9 100.0 100.0<br />
Per cent of services assessed at level 2<br />
2003<br />
na na 62.2 na 14.6 na .. –<br />
2004<br />
na – 8.3 na 5.6 na .. –<br />
2005<br />
0.6 – 6.7 12.9 2.7 – .. 50.0<br />
2006<br />
0.9 – 1.7 9.7 3.4 15.2 – –<br />
2007<br />
0.9 – 0.8 41.2 1.8 6.9 – –<br />
(a) The data item 'services reviewed' is optional under the MHE NMDS .<br />
(b)<br />
(c)<br />
(d)<br />
(e)<br />
(f)<br />
Specialised public mental health services reviewed against<br />
National Standards for Mental Health Services, 30 June (a), (b)<br />
The Australian totals are not reported as data are not collected on a equivalent basis across<br />
jurisdictions. Some jurisdictions' report at service unit level while others do not. NSW, Qld, SA, Tas<br />
and ACT report at the service unit level.<br />
Data for Victoria, WA and the NT are reported at the organisation level.<br />
In Victoria, two agencies did not report as at 'Level 1' for 2007. However, both agencies were in the<br />
process of being re-accredited and therefore should be deemed as having gained accreditation.<br />
Queensland data are reported at the hospital/service unit cluster level.<br />
WA has a number of services currently involved in re-accreditation as well as internal review against<br />
the National Standards that are not included in this table.<br />
REPORT ON<br />
GOVERNMENT<br />
SERVICES 2009<br />
HEALTH<br />
MANAGEMENT<br />
ISSUES
Change language