20.05.2014 Views

PROSPECTUS - The Pew Charitable Trusts

PROSPECTUS - The Pew Charitable Trusts

PROSPECTUS - The Pew Charitable Trusts

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Pew</strong> Prospectus 2009<br />

IMPROVING PUBLIC POLICY<br />

Economic Policy<br />

7<br />

Seeking a bipartisan consensus on<br />

reforming the federal budget process.<br />

Subsidies to agriculture and other sectors: a key government economic<br />

tool but little understood by the American public.<br />

<strong>The</strong> initiative produced a pre-election<br />

voter’s guide to the presidential<br />

candidates’ major policy proposals<br />

and their costs. <strong>The</strong> objective was not<br />

to sway public opinion in favor of one<br />

candidate over another, but rather to<br />

inform the national debate and make<br />

voters more aware of the fiscal implications<br />

of various policy alternatives.<br />

<strong>The</strong> program’s next undertaking<br />

involved the creation of a high-level<br />

national commission, in partnership<br />

with the Peter G. Peterson Foundation,<br />

to make recommendations<br />

for improving the congressional<br />

budgeting process. This process,<br />

last updated in 1967, lays the foundation,<br />

and establishes the rules of the<br />

game, for all policy decisions.<br />

Without sound methodology and<br />

rules, meaningful action on critical<br />

policy reform will be far more complicated.<br />

Yet the process has become<br />

fundamentally mismatched with<br />

many of the budgetary needs of the<br />

country. In fact, most of the federal<br />

budget is now on automatic pilot<br />

and does not receive regular oversight.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Peterson-<strong>Pew</strong> Commission<br />

on Budget Reform will develop<br />

targeted recommendations for<br />

legislation, resulting in substantive<br />

improvements to the budgeting process<br />

and enhancing the transparency<br />

of an exercise that deserves greater<br />

public scrutiny.<br />

In a society that holds the free market<br />

in such high regard, the undercurrent<br />

of suspicion about government<br />

intervention is strong. Recent events<br />

in the financial markets, however,<br />

have created a growing backlash<br />

against loosely regulated or unregulated<br />

industry. Through our Markets<br />

Program, <strong>Pew</strong> will launch a series of<br />

initiatives aimed at forging a middle<br />

ground that strikes the appropriate<br />

balance in regulatory policy.<br />

<strong>The</strong> first major project is Subsidyscope,<br />

which seeks to focus public<br />

and policy-maker attention on the<br />

size and scope of federal subsidies by<br />

aggregating information on direct<br />

payments, loan guarantees and tax<br />

expenditures from multiple sources<br />

into a comprehensive, searchable,<br />

high-quality database. By increasing<br />

the public’s understanding of the<br />

extent to which our nation’s markets<br />

are managed, Subsidyscope can<br />

encourage a truly informed debate<br />

about how best to deploy increasingly<br />

scarce government resources.<br />

Our nation is already engaged in<br />

debates over appropriate levels of<br />

government spending, debt, subsidies<br />

and regulation, and good data<br />

will surely be critical to informing<br />

these discussions. We believe that<br />

the Economic Policy department is<br />

poised to make significant contributions<br />

by providing understandable,<br />

unbiased research that will engage<br />

the public and policy makers, and<br />

lead to meaningful policy change.<br />

John E. Morton<br />

Managing Director<br />

Economic Policy

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!