H1N1 COUNTERMEASURES STRATEGY AND ... - PHE Home
H1N1 COUNTERMEASURES STRATEGY AND ... - PHE Home
H1N1 COUNTERMEASURES STRATEGY AND ... - PHE Home
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
NBSB Pandemic Influenza Working Group<br />
Detailed Report<br />
RADM Vanderwagen noted that preparedness is a broad enterprise with a wide variety of<br />
partners. For example, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) works on discovery<br />
research; the Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority (BARDA)<br />
translates that research into products to counter threats, e.g., a novel virus; the Food and<br />
Drug Administration (FDA) ensures the products are safe and effective; and the Centers<br />
for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) conducts epidemiologic and scientific studies<br />
and facilitates implementation through distribution of products. Successful<br />
implementation, however, all comes down to State and local colleagues: Will they be<br />
able to use the tools we develop? How can we support them? How can we encourage<br />
them to take advantage of the tools available? Ultimately, their communities, families,<br />
and friends receive the countermeasures we develop. Therefore, no single Federal<br />
agency acts alone, nor does the Federal government act alone as one entity. Rather,<br />
partnership reaches all the way down to the level of the individual patient.<br />
RADM Vanderwagen displayed the decision tree his office is using to facilitate its<br />
efforts. Among the issues to consider for <strong>H1N1</strong> influenza, he said, is the availability of a<br />
vaccine and how a vaccine would be used—both of which are affected by the severity,<br />
spread, and timing of the disease, as well as special populations or target groups affected<br />
by the disease. The potential use of adjuvants should also be considered. RADM<br />
Vanderwagen reiterated the need for outside experts to provide input on the decisionmaking<br />
process. Specifically, the meeting participants should explore what we know<br />
about the science of countermeasures (vaccines, diagnostics, and therapeutics) and how<br />
to use them. No timeline has yet been identified, but it is believed that we are<br />
experiencing the first wave of <strong>H1N1</strong> influenza now and anticipate a second wave in the<br />
fall. If a vaccine is to be used, many of the questions about what to use, when, and for<br />
who must be answered within the next 90 days.<br />
RADM Vanderwagen said the effort represents a worthy challenge, in which public<br />
health and preparedness experts must come together to create tools that will ensure<br />
resilience, should there be a severe resurgence in the fall. He emphasized that the health<br />
and well-being of society at large are the central concerns as the United States gears up to<br />
address not only the threat of <strong>H1N1</strong> virus, but also the fall hurricane season. He thanked<br />
the participants for their time and input.<br />
NOVEL <strong>H1N1</strong> VACCINE <strong>STRATEGY</strong><br />
<strong>H1N1</strong> Vaccine Strategy—Robin Robinson, Ph.D., BARDA<br />
Dr. Robinson said a convergence of events led to the development of the National<br />
Strategy for Pandemic Influenza: the H5N1 virus reemerged, and surprising results from<br />
clinical studies showed that the H5 vaccine developed would not protect 90% of the<br />
people. Hurricane Katrina exposed significant gaps in disaster response planning and<br />
capacity. Having only one manufacturer to produce seasonal influenza vaccine (for the<br />
2004–2005 season) demonstrated what a vaccine shortage would be like. With all of<br />
these events happening in the early part of the decade, and 29 years after the 1976 swine<br />
influenza epidemic, Congress passed PAHPA and established BARDA to develop<br />
3