H1N1 COUNTERMEASURES STRATEGY AND ... - PHE Home
H1N1 COUNTERMEASURES STRATEGY AND ... - PHE Home
H1N1 COUNTERMEASURES STRATEGY AND ... - PHE Home
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
NBSB Pandemic Influenza Working Group<br />
Detailed Report<br />
phase-3 studies in Japan have recently completed enrollment, but data from these studies<br />
is not yet available. The completed phase-2 study in Japan in 2008-2009 was a<br />
rigorously designed and executed randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial<br />
comparing one short IV infusion of peramivir (two different doses were tested, 300mg<br />
and 600mg) with placebo in acute uncomplicated influenza. The primary endpoint was<br />
time to alleviation of symptoms (TTAS). The efficacy outcome was unequivocally<br />
positive, with all efficacy endpoints showing significant improvement over placebo. The<br />
time to alleviation of symptoms was 81.8 hours for placebo, and was shortened by about<br />
22 hours with peramivir (p=0.0046). Time to resolution of fever was also significantly<br />
improved in the peramivir groups compared to placebo. Change in viral load, determined<br />
by nasal-pharyngeal swabs at baseline and at several protocol-specified post-treatment<br />
timepoints, is another important outcome, as it is a direct measure of antiviral activity.<br />
These evaluations showed that viral clearance was significantly accelerated in the 600mg<br />
peramivir group compared to placebo.<br />
The safety experience for peramivir was very satisfactory in this study. Reported AEs<br />
were mild, and no serious AEs were reported in the 198 subjects administered peramivir<br />
in the study. The reported AEs were of similar frequency and severity grade in the<br />
placebo and treatment groups. These efficacy and safety results formed the basis of the<br />
peramivir phase 3 program in Japan.<br />
BioCryst’s phase-2 study of peramivir in patients with influenza requiring hospitalization<br />
was difficult to perform, and is the only study ever completed in this patient population.<br />
It required multiple sites and countries and enrollment extended over 2 Northern<br />
Hemisphere and 1 Southern Hemisphere season. An important issue for influenza<br />
clinical research is lack of awareness of influenza in the hospital setting. This problem<br />
seems partly due to lack of reliable diagnostic tests in emergency rooms – it is estimated<br />
that only 5% of patients hospitalized with influenza actually receive that diagnosis.<br />
Better access to confirmatory diagnostic tests would greatly improve the ability to recruit<br />
patients for such studies.<br />
A placebo-controlled study was not practical for ethical reasons, so oral oseltamivir was<br />
used as a control, even though it is not approved for this indication. Two different doses<br />
of IV peramivir were evaluated, 200mg daily for 5 days and 400mg daily for 5 days. The<br />
primary endpoint was time to clinical stability, which was adapted from studies of<br />
community-acquired pneumonia.<br />
A main goal of this study was to evaluate peramivir in a patient population with more<br />
serious disease or underlying risk factors for complications. The patient population<br />
enrolled consisted mostly of individuals admitted with chronic illness that worsened with<br />
influenza, and not patients with influenza-pneumonia. The study patients had good<br />
clinical outcomes, and BioCryst was pleased with the rapidity of clearance of the virus.<br />
Viral cultures were obtained from nasopharyngeal swabs at regular intervals. Overall,<br />
viral load was reduced rapidly with treatment. Detailed analyses of the viral culture data<br />
indicated that the baseline viral load was higher in subjects with less that 48 hrs of<br />
symptoms at enrollment, and in influenza B subjects. In the influenza B subjects, a<br />
75