21.05.2014 Views

H1N1 COUNTERMEASURES STRATEGY AND ... - PHE Home

H1N1 COUNTERMEASURES STRATEGY AND ... - PHE Home

H1N1 COUNTERMEASURES STRATEGY AND ... - PHE Home

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

NBSB Pandemic Influenza Working Group<br />

Detailed Report<br />

95 laboratories in the United States, 15 DoD laboratories internationally, and 250 other<br />

laboratories internationally. More than 600 genes have been sequenced.<br />

The enhanced virologic surveillance demonstrated that seasonal influenza continues to<br />

occur longer than public health officials thought. Dr. Jernigan pointed out that even poor<br />

surveillance efforts can provide useful data if they are consistent.<br />

Initially, testing was recommended for any suspicion of <strong>H1N1</strong>, but the rapid increase in<br />

test requests and increased number of worried-well in clinics led to a change. Also, the<br />

number of people with mild disease who might not otherwise seek care confuses the<br />

situation. Later recommendations focused on those who were hospitalized or at high risk,<br />

so the surveillance results change. Furthermore, recommendations varied by jurisdiction,<br />

and there was uncertainty about the performance of rapid tests and direct fluorescent<br />

antibody (DFA) testing.<br />

Dr. Jernigan said rapid tests are popular with doctors and they have a place, because<br />

positive results mean something. Recent data show rapid tests for seasonal influenza<br />

have an average sensitivity of 27% (ranging from 19% to 32%) and average specificity of<br />

97% (range: 96–99%). A DoD Global Emerging Infections Surveillance and Response<br />

System (GEIS) site used nasal wash specimens from clinics and compared rapid lab tests<br />

with PCR; it found sensitivities ranging from 12% for novel <strong>H1N1</strong> to 40% for influenza<br />

A, but 99% specificity for novel <strong>H1N1</strong>, influenza A, and influenza B. Dr. Jernigan said<br />

PCR seems to be emerging as the de facto standard.<br />

Dr. Jernigan reiterated the CDC’s projections for the course of the disease. PCR kits<br />

continue to be distributed globally, which is expensive. The so-called swine primers<br />

have been submitted for FDA approval so they can become part of the assay. The PCR<br />

protocol has been published, which will allow people to make their own assays.<br />

Dr. Jernigan outlined some of the successes of the planning and response, including the<br />

insistence on focusing more broadly than H5N1 for diagnostic tests and the investment in<br />

public health labs’ diagnostic and development capacity (although more is still needed).<br />

The challenges include the following:<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

Pandemic <strong>H1N1</strong> subtyping capability is largely limited to public health<br />

laboratories.<br />

Many laboratories are unable to handle a surge.<br />

PCR reagents were in short supply early in the outbreak.<br />

Clinicians do not have accessible tests for diagnosing pandemic <strong>H1N1</strong>.<br />

Increased number of laboratory-developed tests and new technologies may assist<br />

diagnosis, but are difficult to validate.<br />

Rapid antigen detection tests remain with some uncertainty in performance.<br />

Engagement of CDC with diagnostic companies for accelerated assay<br />

development could be improved.<br />

Upcoming season may have H1, pandemic H1, H3, and B at once, making for a<br />

57

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!