directional microphone technology - Phonak

More documents

Recommendations

Info

• Candidacy: – Audiogram approach – LiSN-S/LiSN-S PGA – COSI • Factors to consider: – Dexterity – Technologically „Savy‟? – Ease of use – Listening situations – Cost FM Classroom February 2013
1. Children with hearing loss that attend special (deaf) schools 2. Children with hearing loss that attend regular schools 3. Adult hearing instrument users 4. Children and adults with cochlear implants 5. Children and adults with unilateral hearing loss 6. Children and adults with auditory processing disorder 7. Non native learners (ESL) 8. Adults with multiple sclerosis 9. Children with Autism spectrum disorder FM Classroom February 2013
Page 1 and 2: Peter Stelmacovich FM Classroom and
Page 3 and 4: SNR in typical Listening situations
Page 5 and 6: FM Classroom February 2013
Page 7 and 8: Pediatric_A_GB without dNC with dNC
Page 9 and 10: • Improvements in SNR for directi
Page 11 and 12: FM Classroom February 2013
Page 13 and 14: 13 -35° 0° 35° - 60° 60° -90°
Page 15 and 16: • Directional microphones have pr
Page 17 and 18: • By moving a microphone from the
Page 19 and 20: 19 • Wireless, omnidirectional mi
Page 21 and 22: • Wear it at the correct location
Page 23 and 24: • To achieve an improvement in SN
Page 25 and 26: • Dynamic FM is different than fi
Page 27 and 28: • Ambient noise levels are estima
Page 29: FM Classroom February 2013
Page 33 and 34: • LiSN-S PGA is a brand new diagn
Page 35 and 36: Run the test Professional clicks
Page 37 and 38: LiSN-S PGA‟s results mention clea
Page 39 and 40: X Even with amplification, the pati
Page 41 and 42: X FM Classroom February 2013 Even w

directional microphone technology - Phonak

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?