26.05.2014 Views

ISSN 1451-5776 CD-Rom edition - Prirodnjacki muzej Crne Gore

ISSN 1451-5776 CD-Rom edition - Prirodnjacki muzej Crne Gore

ISSN 1451-5776 CD-Rom edition - Prirodnjacki muzej Crne Gore

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>ISSN</strong> <strong>1451</strong>‐<strong>5776</strong> <strong>CD</strong>‐<strong>Rom</strong> <strong>edition</strong>


Natura Montenegrina journal for science and popular science<br />

PUBLISHED BY:<br />

IZDAVAČ:<br />

Natural History Museum of Montenegro<br />

Prirodnjački <strong>muzej</strong> <strong>Crne</strong> <strong>Gore</strong><br />

Editor in chief - Glavni urednik:<br />

Technical editor - Tehnički urednik:<br />

Marko KARAMAN<br />

Snežana DRAGIĆEVIĆ<br />

EDITORIAL - REDAKCIJA<br />

Akad. Prof. Dr Gordan Karaman<br />

Prof. Dr Sreten Mandić<br />

Prof. Dr Drago Marić<br />

Prof. Dr Milivoje Purić<br />

Dr Vlado Pešić<br />

Ondrej Vizi<br />

Marko Karaman M.Sc.<br />

Suzana Brajović M.Sc.<br />

Mr Gordana Kasom M.Sc.<br />

Danijel Vincek<br />

Electronic arrangement of <strong>CD</strong> ROM: Sreten Šćepanović,<br />

Elektronska obrada diska: Marko Karaman<br />

Logo designer:<br />

Lazar Jakovljević<br />

Dizajn logoa:<br />

ON LINE EDITION: www.pmcg.cg.yu/Natura_Montenegrina.html<br />

<strong>ISSN</strong> 1800-7155 On line <strong>edition</strong><br />

address for contact and exchange / adresa za kontakt i razmjenu:<br />

Prirodnjački <strong>muzej</strong> <strong>Crne</strong> <strong>Gore</strong><br />

NATURAL HISTORY MUSEUM OF MONTENEGRO<br />

P.O. Box 374, 81000 Podgorica, Montenegro<br />

E-mail: natura@pmcg.cg.yu


Natura Montenegrina<br />

Journal for science and popular science<br />

INSTRUCTIONS TO AUTHORS<br />

"Natura Montenegrina" publishes scientific, professional and scientific-popular<br />

papers from the field of biology, geology, forestry, biotechnique and environmental<br />

protection, surveys of scientific and professional publications, reviews and releases on<br />

scientific meetings, photographs from the nature and information of general<br />

significance.<br />

"Natura Montenegrina" is published exclusively in electronic form, as <strong>CD</strong> <strong>edition</strong><br />

(<strong>ISSN</strong> <strong>1451</strong>-<strong>5776</strong>) and in On-line <strong>edition</strong> (<strong>ISSN</strong> 1800-7155) at web address of Natural<br />

History Museum of Montenegro www.pmcg.co.me.<br />

Manuscripts are submitted to the Editorial office (Natural History Museum of<br />

Montenegro, PO.O.Box 374, 81000 Podgorica, Crna Gora (Montenegro), in two<br />

copies, legibly typed on paper of format A4 with double spacing and margin of 4 cm on<br />

the left side, with not more than 30 rows on one page and on floppy disks, <strong>CD</strong> or DVD<br />

discs. To avoid hard copy, papers could be send on E-mail: natura@pmcg.co.me<br />

Manuscripts of scientific and professional papers are published exclusively in the<br />

English Language. Authors whose native language is not English are encouraged to<br />

have their manuscripts read by a native English-speaking colleague before submission.<br />

Instruction for the work on the computer: Word 6.0 or more recent; font Arial, 10<br />

pt, distance between the letters 0.5 pt, titles and subtitles without Caps Lock, spacing<br />

single. Use in text as little formatting as possible (use only bold and italics where<br />

necessary). Special symbols (e.g. male or female sign) should be avoided because they<br />

are likely to be altered when files are read on different computers. You can code them<br />

as m# and f#, which can be replaced during page setting.<br />

- The title should be concise and informative.<br />

- The full name of the author(s) must be given below the title and should be<br />

typed in the upper case.<br />

- The address of each author should be given below the name of author(s). E-mail<br />

address(es) should be provided if possible.<br />

- The address in scientific and professional papers is followed by a brief synopsis<br />

(summary) in the English Language, than title and synopsis in<br />

Montenegrin/Serbian/other. Synopsis, (till 10 rows) consists of the data on<br />

thematics of the paper and the key words are given at the end. Abstract (summary,<br />

synopsis) in English Language are obligatory. Abstracts in other languages<br />

(Montenegrian, Serbian or other) we suggest to be included in addition to English<br />

abstract. Authors may submit longer extracts (summary) in<br />

Montenegrian/Serbian/other at the end of the paper. Papers which have already been<br />

published either in their entity or in essential parts shall not be accepted for<br />

publishing.<br />

Scientific paper, as a rule, should have the following chapters: introduction,<br />

subject and method of research/work, results with discussion, conclusion, which should<br />

provide a clear and brief picture of the research and obtained results, list of literature<br />

used and (optionally) summary in the alternative language. The arrangement of the<br />

main text may varies with different types of papers, but should start with an<br />

introduction and end with list of literature.<br />

All literature cited in the text must be listed in the references in the following<br />

format:<br />

3


- Journal paper:<br />

MARIĆ, D., ĆIROVIĆ, R. 2002: Morphological Characteristics of Bass (Perca fluviatilis Linnaeus,<br />

1758) (Percidae, Pisces) from Skadar Lake. - Natura Montenegrina, Podgorica,1: 125-134, .<br />

- Book chapter:<br />

COBLE, D. & KNEŽEVIĆ, B. 1981: Growth and mortality of bleak (Alburnus albidus alborella) and<br />

carp (Cyprinus carpio) in Lake Skadar. In: Karaman, G.S. & Beeton, A.M. (Eds), The Biota and<br />

Limnology of Lake Skadar. - Biološki zavod Titograd, Smithsonian Institution Washington. pp:<br />

320-333.<br />

- Book:<br />

BOLTON, B. 1995: A New General Catalogue of the Ants of the World. - Harward University Press,<br />

Cambridge, Mass., London, 504 pp.<br />

- Internet resources:<br />

AUTHOR (year): Title of website, database or other resources. - Publisher name and location (if<br />

indicated), number of pages (if known). Available from: http://xxx.xxxxxxx.xxx (Date of last<br />

access)<br />

- Disertations and non-serial proceedings of symposia/conferences are to be treated as<br />

books and cited as such.<br />

Jornal titles must be written in full (not abbreviated).<br />

The names of quoted authors are written expanded 2.5 pt; the year of publishing of<br />

mentioned quotation comes next. Scientific names of the taxa are written in italics. The name of<br />

the author of a taxon is quoted only the first time in the text and on the figure, subsequently it is<br />

not quoted, provided that the text does not loose its clarity.<br />

Scope of one manuscript is limited to 16 pages (2,000 symbols per page) where two<br />

illustrations equal one page. Exceptionally, if the contents and quality justify that, the papers may<br />

have larger scope.<br />

Texts for the tables, figures and other contributions are written separately from the main<br />

text, author clearly designates in the text, respectively on margin of the manuscript on the paper<br />

the place on which that contribution should be inserted.<br />

Graphs, tables and drawings are submitted made in Indian ink on white or on paus paper in<br />

larger format (A4 format desirable) than it will be in the publication, or they should be made in<br />

appropriate program (Word, Excel, Corel-Draw). Photographs should be clear, with contrast on<br />

shining paper.<br />

Should the paper contain scanned contributions they should be submitted in TIFF, .BMP or<br />

.JPG format with resolution of 200 dpi.<br />

Summary in Montenegrin/Serbian/other should be brief, sufficient to acquaint the reader<br />

with the character of the paper, results and conclusions regarding the problem dealt with. Above<br />

the text of the summary there should be the name and the address of the author and the title of<br />

the paper.<br />

Scientific-popular and other articles should present interesting things and events from the<br />

nature. They are submitted in English and the Montenegrin/Serbian language; should the author<br />

fail to do so the editorial board is entitled to have the paper trenslated into the alternative<br />

language. They should be original, written in a clear, readable style, illustrated by the quality<br />

photographs. The authorship of the photographs has to be clearly indicated. Original photographs<br />

or scanned ones with resolution of 200 dpi should be submitted. The original negative may be<br />

submitted, and the slides must be submitted in the original.<br />

Marko G. Karaman<br />

Editor in chief<br />

4


Dear Colleagues,<br />

The Natural History Museum of Montenegro has published the Journal of<br />

science and popular-science „NATURA MONTENEGRINA“ since 2001 in<br />

electronic format and has distributed its <strong>CD</strong> <strong>edition</strong>. At its beginings the journal<br />

was primarily designated for the increasing number of young Montenegrian<br />

scientists, mostly biologists and other related fields, as a medium that presented<br />

their scientific findings.<br />

Six years later we are changing our goals – to become a journal that will<br />

publish original scientific and professional articles in the fields of<br />

research, protection and popularization of natural values and thus<br />

represent an important source of scientific information from the Balkan region.<br />

The biodiversity of Balkan Peninsula is still the least explored part of Europe.<br />

Therefore, we believe that journals like this one, which originate in this region,<br />

should be committed to present data about our biodiversity to the rest of the<br />

world.<br />

Beside scientific and professional articles, we will also publish short<br />

communications – significant scientific contributions that do not fulfill, in their<br />

entirety, the requirements for a scientific or professional article.<br />

The third component of the Journal is popular science. Your institute or<br />

organization celebrates a jubilee, you want to present the progress of your<br />

project, or photographs of nature research activity ... these are the reasons to<br />

publish popular scientific articles that will be interesting to the scientific<br />

comunity as well as to a broader audience.<br />

»NATURA MONTENEGRINA« is distributed to more than 350 locations<br />

worldwide. Contents of previous volumes and the abstracts of published papers<br />

can be accessed on our website www.pmcg.cg.yu/natura_montenegrina.htm.<br />

You can send your articles to the following e-mail address:<br />

natura@pmcg.cg.yu . The Instructions for Authors are available on our website<br />

and on page 6.<br />

We also welcome scientist interested in refereeing articles sent to our journal.<br />

Marko G. Karaman<br />

Chief Editor<br />

5


Poštovane kolege,<br />

Prirodnjački <strong>muzej</strong> <strong>Crne</strong> <strong>Gore</strong> od 2001. godine izdaje naučni i<br />

naučno-popularni časopis “NATURA MONTENEGRINA” - časopis<br />

koji se izdaje u elektronskoj formi, a distribuira u vidu <strong>CD</strong> izdanja.<br />

Na početku postojanja časopis je bio namijenjen, prije svega,<br />

mladom crnogorskom naučnom kadru koji, na počecima svog<br />

naučnog djelovanja, nije imao veliki izbor časopisa za objavljivanje<br />

rezultata.<br />

Nakon šest godina postojanja usmjeravamo se ka novom cilju -<br />

prerastanju u časopis koji će NAUČNIM I STRUČNIM RADOVIMA<br />

IZ OBLASTI PROUČAVANJA, ZAŠTITE I POPULARIZACIJE<br />

PRIRODNIH VRIJEDNOSTI predstavljati značajan izvor informacija<br />

sa područja Balkana. Priroda Balkana je i dalje najslabije proučena u<br />

Evropi. Zato smatramo da upravo časopisi koji nastaju u ovom<br />

regionu treba da ostalom dijelu svijeta iznesu podatke o našoj<br />

prirodi.<br />

Pored naučnih i stručnih radova obraćamo Vam pažnju i na<br />

mogućnost objavljivanja KRATKIH SAOPŠTENJA - naučnih opažanja<br />

iz prirode, dovoljno značajnih da budu objavljena, ali koja ne<br />

ispunjavaju uslove da budu napisana kao naučni ili stručni članak.<br />

Treći segment časopisa je NAUČNO-POPULARNI DIO. Vaša<br />

institucija ili organizacija obiljezava neki jubilej, želite da objavite<br />

tok realizacije nekog projekta, zabilježili ste fotografijom posjetu<br />

nekom lokalitetu ... sve su to razlozi da objavite naučno-popularni<br />

članak - zanimljiv, kako stručnoj tako i laičkoj javnosti.<br />

U toku je odabir recenzenata, kako domaćih tako i inostranih<br />

stručnjaka u odredjenim oblastima prirodnih nauka. Time će kvalitet<br />

časopisa, pored redovnosti koju smo do sada postigli, biti podignuta<br />

na viši nivo. NATURA MONTENEGRINA se distribuira na vise od 350<br />

adresa širom svijeta. Sadržaj dosadasnjih brojeva i rezime radova<br />

mozete pogledati na web stranici:<br />

www.pmcg.cg.yu/natura_montenegrina.htm .<br />

Vaše priloge možete slati na adresu natura@pmcg.cg.yu, a<br />

UPUTSTVO AUTORIMA možete pogledati na stranici 6, kao I na<br />

našem web sajtu.<br />

Nadam se da ćemo saradjivati.<br />

Marko G. Karaman<br />

glavni urednik<br />

6


Natura Montenegrina, Podgorica, 6/2007<br />

CONTENTS:<br />

NATURA MONTENEGRINA, PODGORICA, 6, 2007<br />

EDITORIAL . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2<br />

INSTRUCTIONS TO AUTHORS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3<br />

Foreword by editor . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5<br />

Riječ urednika . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6<br />

I Scientific part<br />

BOTANY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .<br />

. . .<br />

ZOOLOGY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .<br />

. . .<br />

BIOCHEMISTRY AND<br />

GENETICS . .<br />

II Short communications . . . .<br />

. . .<br />

I Naučni dio<br />

9 BOTANIKA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9<br />

63 ZOOLOGIJA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 63<br />

123 BIOHEMIJA I GENETIKA . . . . . . . . . . 123<br />

151 II Kratka saopštenja . . . . . . . . . . . . 151<br />

BOTANY:<br />

BOTANIKA:<br />

Rodica BERCU<br />

VARIATION IN THE ANATOMY OF THE VASCULAR SYSTEM OF Asplenium trichomanes-ramosum L.<br />

Nada BUBANJA, Vladimir STEVANOVIĆ, Dmitar LAKUŠIĆ<br />

Edraianthus dalmaticus A.DC. (CAMPANULACEAE) IN MONTENEGRO<br />

Nada BUBANJA, Snežana VUKSANOVIĆ<br />

Onosma pseudoarenaria Schur. ssp. tridentina (Wettst.) Br.- Bl., NEW TAXON IN FLORA OF<br />

MONTENEGRO<br />

9-17<br />

19-25<br />

27-30<br />

Rajko T R I P I Ć<br />

CONTRIBUTION TO THE KNOWLEDGE OF THE FLOWERING PHENOLOGY AND SEX EXPRESSION IN Acer 31-52<br />

monspessulanum L. FROM MONTENEGRO<br />

Snežana VUKSANOVIĆ & Danka PETROVIĆ<br />

THE FLORA AND VEGETATION OF SALT WORKS IN ULCINJ<br />

ZOOLOGY:<br />

ZOOLOGIJA:<br />

Vera VUKANIĆ<br />

CONTRIBUTION TO KNOWLEDGE OF DISTRIBUTION AND SEASONAL DINAMIC OF THE PLANCTONIC<br />

POLYCHETA IN SOUTH ADRIATIC WATERS<br />

Bogić GLIGOROVIĆ, Vladimir PEŠIĆ & Aleksandra ZEKOVIĆ<br />

A CONTRIBUTION TO THE KNOWLEDGE OF THE DRAGONFLIES (ODONATA) OF THE RIVER ZETA<br />

(MONTENEGRO)<br />

Jelena NIKČEVIĆ<br />

THE ORTHOPTEROID FAUNA OF THE ĆEMOVSKO SEMI-DESERT FIELD NEAR PODGORICA,<br />

MONTENEGRO<br />

Natalija ČAĐENOVIĆ, Tanja VUKOV<br />

MORPHOLOGICAL TRAITS OF COMMON TOAD Bufo bufo (Bufonidae) FROM BIOGRADSKO LAKE<br />

Natalija ČAĐENOVIĆ<br />

A CONTRIBUTION TO THE KNOWLEDGE OF DISTRIBUTION OF SPECIES Bufo bufo IN MONTENEGRO<br />

53-61<br />

63-71<br />

73-89<br />

91-100<br />

101-109<br />

111-114<br />

Lidija POLOVIĆ, Katarina LJUBISAVLJEVIĆ<br />

MORPHOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF A POPULATION OF THE MOSOR ROCK LIZARD (Dinarolacerta<br />

mosorensis KOLOMBATOVIĆ, 1886) (SQUAMATA: LACERTIDAE) FROM LOVĆEN MOUNTAIN<br />

(MONTENEGRO)<br />

115-122<br />

BIOCHEMISTRY AND GENETICS:<br />

BIOHEMIJA I GENETIKA:<br />

Nebojša JOCKOVIĆ, Milica PAVLOVIĆ, Marko SABOVLJEVIĆ and Nada KOVAČEVIĆ<br />

CONTRIBUTION TO THE CHEMICAL CONSTITUENTS OF BALKAN BRYOPHYTES: PHENOLIC ACIDS,<br />

FLAVONOIDS, TRITERPENES AND ALKALOIDS<br />

123-129


Natura Montenegrina, Podgorica, 6/2007<br />

Danko OBRADOVIĆ<br />

PCR (Polymerase Chain Reaction) IN DETECTION OF Chlamydia trachomatis AND THE OTHER<br />

METHODS – A COMPARATIVE SURVEY<br />

Danko OBRADOVIĆ<br />

INFLUENCE OF TRANSGENIC PLANTS ON ENVIRONMENT<br />

131-136<br />

137-149<br />

II SHORT COMMUNICATIONS:<br />

II KRATKA SAOPŠTENJA:<br />

Vera BIBERDŽIĆ<br />

Caldesia parnassifolia (L.) Parl NEW SPECIES IN MONTENEGRIN FLORA<br />

Danijela STEŠEVIĆ & Nejc JOGAN<br />

ADDITIONS TO THE FLORA OF MONTENEGRO: Setaria verticilliformis Dumort., Setaria viridis (L.) PB.<br />

subsp. pycnocoma (Steud) Tzvel., Impatiens balsamina L. AND Catalpa bignoniodes Walt.<br />

Igor TOMOVIĆ & Danijela STEŠEVIĆ<br />

Duchesnea indica (Andr.) Focke, NEW ALIEN SPECIES IN THE FLORA OF MONTENEGRO<br />

151-152<br />

153-160<br />

161-163


NATURA MONTENEGRINA, PODGORICA, 6: 9-17<br />

VARIATION IN THE ANATOMY OF THE VASCULAR SYSTEM<br />

OF Asplenium trichomanes-ramosum L.<br />

Rodica B E R C U 1<br />

1 Department of Botany, Faculty of Natural and Agriculture Sciences, “Ovidius” University,<br />

Mamaia Str. 124, 900590, Constantza, <strong>Rom</strong>ania, E-mail: rodicabercu@yahoo.com<br />

Key words:<br />

anatomy,<br />

variation,<br />

vascular system,<br />

estimation,<br />

Asplenium trichomanesramosum<br />

SYNOPSIS<br />

The paper provides new data regarding the variation of the<br />

vascular system in the vegetative organs of Asplenium trichomanesramosum<br />

L. The anatomical structure of the adventitious root<br />

(starting up directly from the underground stem), rhizome (stem)<br />

and the frond’s petiole and rachis exhibit a diarch type root, a<br />

dictyostelic rhizome and an X- and T-shaped petiole and rachis<br />

vascular system up to the subterminal rachis. Based on the variation<br />

of the vascular system in A. trichomanes-ramosum anatomy we<br />

used a mathematical calculation to estimate the number of the<br />

vascular bundles in the fern vegetative organs.<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

Asplenium trichomanes-ramosum L. (syn. A. viride Huds.), known as bright<br />

green spleenwort or simple green spleenwort, is a perennial member of family A<br />

spleniaceae. The branching rhizomes are short, creeping to erect, bearing dark brown<br />

to black scales (C i o c a r l a n , 2000). The evergreen compound fronds, simply divided<br />

are tufted at the crown, 4–15 (-20) cm long; persistent to dying in the autumn and<br />

circinnate. The frond’s rachis is green and not winged.<br />

The petioles are often shorter than the blade. The petioles are brownish or<br />

blackish only near the base and green above. It grows in spring and fructifies in<br />

summer. The leaves disappear slowly during the next spring (W a t s o n . &<br />

D a l l w i t z , 2004).<br />

In <strong>Rom</strong>ania it grows in shaded crevices of limestone boulders, cool and moist<br />

places, up to an altitude above 1800m (S a v u l e s c u , 1952). Knowledge on the<br />

variations of the vascular system organization of the fern vegetative organs is quite<br />

limited (O g u r a , 1938, 1972, S c h n e i d e r , 1996), and that of A. trichomanes-


10<br />

Natura Montenegrina, 6/2007<br />

ramosum L. is almost lacking. The goal of the research was to examine the anatomy<br />

of the adventitious root, rhizome, and frond’s petiole and rachis in order to find a<br />

mathematical distribution function to estimate the number of the vascular bundles in<br />

the fern vegetative organs in accordance with plant morphology, habitat and the<br />

cutting level.<br />

MATERIAL AND METHODS<br />

The plant was collected from the Bicaz Gorges in the Carpathians Mountains.<br />

Cross sections of the adventitious root, rhizome and the frond’s petiole and rachis of<br />

A. trichomnaes-ramosum were performed using a rotary microtome. The petiole and<br />

rachis structure were analyzed by serial cross sections (2 to 2 cm), distributed from<br />

the base up to the rachis tip. The samples were stained with alum-carmine and iodine<br />

green and were embedded in Canada balsam. Observations were made with a<br />

BIOROM-T bright field microscope, equipped with a TOPICA-6001A video camera.<br />

The microphotographs were obtained from the video camera through a computer.<br />

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION<br />

Cross sections of the adventitious root revealed that the cortex is composed of<br />

2-3 layers of large parenchyma cells (Fig. 1). The inner cells of the cortex are<br />

modified and have thick walls. Kroemer (1903) has suggested that this wall thickening<br />

is the result of cutinized blade superpositions. Some authors have noticed the<br />

presence of such “curious cells” around the stele and have suggested that this tissue<br />

belonged to the stele naming it “sclerenchymatous mass” (R u s s o w 1872,<br />

B i e r h o r s t 1971) or a “stereomic sheath” (de B a r y 1877, O g u r a 1938, B e r c u<br />

1998, 2006). This configuration has led S c h n e i d e r (1996) to ascribe this type of<br />

root to that of Asplenium. The stele consists of xylem and phloem and is surrounded<br />

by the pericycle (Fig. 1). The xylem vessels are joined together towards the center by<br />

their metaxylem vessels (two for each bundle). The protoxylem vessels (three for each<br />

bundle) are in an exarch position and face the pericycle. The phloem sieve cells,<br />

lacking companion cells, are located on either side of the xylem string. Thus the<br />

adventitious root of A. trichomanes-ramosum has a diarch structure. Remarkable are<br />

the passing cells (Fig. 1).<br />

Cross sections of the rhizome disclosed that the epidermis consists of a single<br />

layer of cells not covered by cuticle (Fig. 2A). Below the epidermis is the cortex,<br />

differentiated into a sclerenchyma cortex and the inner cortex, the latter consisting of<br />

large parenchyma cells. Remarkable is the abundance of starch grains in the cortical<br />

cells and endodermis as well (amiliferous sheath) (Fig. 2B). As O g u r a (1938) and<br />

B i r (1957) reported for Aspleniaceae species, the stele is a dictyostele composed of<br />

a variable number of meristeles (in accordance with the number of foliar traces) each<br />

surrounded by its own endodermis (starch sheath) and pericycle. The latter is


11<br />

B e r c u : VARIATION IN THE ANATOMY OF THE VASCULAR SYSTEM …<br />

composed of parenchyma cells regularly arranged in one row, (locally in two or even<br />

three rows). Each meristeles is hadrocentric with a binary structure (metaxylem<br />

vessels towards the center and protoxylem elements facing the pericycle). The pith<br />

rays among the meristeles occur. The pith occupies the central area of the rhizome<br />

(Fig. 2B).<br />

Fig. 1. Cross section of the adventitious<br />

root, x 206: C- cortex; Mx- metaxylem; Pcpericycle;<br />

Ph- phloem; Px- protoxilem; SSsclerenchyma<br />

sheath.<br />

Fig 2. Cross sections of the rhizome. (A). Portion of the epidermis, cortex and stele, x 160: C-<br />

cortex, E – epidermis, GT – ground tissue, M- meristeles, Pi- pith, PiR- pith ray. (B) A stele<br />

vascular bundle (meristele), x 212: Ed- endodermis, Mx- metaxylem, Pc- pericycle, Ph- phloem, Pxprotoxylem.<br />

Cross section of the petiole base exhibits an epidermis, the cortex differentiated<br />

into an external (sclerenchzmatous) and an inner cortex, followed by a ground tissue.<br />

The vascular system of the leaf petiole base is composed of two meristeles, equal in<br />

size (distele). Each meristele is surrounded by an endodermis and a “special<br />

pericycle” (A n d r e i , 1978). The meristeles are composed of centrally located xylem<br />

elements surrounded by phloem. Protoxylem vessels are in an exarch position<br />

whereas the metaxylem vessels are in the centre. That is attributed to the stele a<br />

hadrocentric and distelic structure (Fig. 3).


12<br />

Natura Montenegrina, 6/2007<br />

Fig. 3 Cross section of the leaf petiole<br />

base, x 83: E- epidermis, GT- ground<br />

tissue, IC- inner cortex, M- meristele,<br />

SC- sclerenchyma cortex.<br />

Fig. 4 Cross section of the leaf petiole (2 cm from the leaf base). (A) General view, x 64: C- cortex,<br />

E- epidermis, St- stele. (B) Portion of epidermis and cortex, x 272: E- epidermis, IC- inner cortex,<br />

SC-sclerenchymatic cortex. (C) The stele vascular bundle, x 266: Ed- endodermis, Pc- pericycle, Phphloem,<br />

Mx- metaxylem, Px- protoxylem.


13<br />

B e r c u : VARIATION IN THE ANATOMY OF THE VASCULAR SYSTEM …<br />

Transverse sections of the petiole, cut from 2 cm above the leaf base, reveals a<br />

single-layered epidermis, covered by cuticle, a cortex and a centrally located stele<br />

(Fig. 4A). Below the epidermis of the base of the petiole is the sclerenchyma cortex<br />

(hypodermis), which consists of a few layers of compactly arranged sclerenchyma<br />

cells. The hypodermis is internally followed by a region of ground tissue (Fig. 4B). The<br />

stele is monofascicular. The vascular bundle is composed of centrally located xylem<br />

vessels surrounded by phloem. The stele X-shaped xylem elements possesses<br />

themetaxylem vessels in a central position and the protoxylem elements in an exarch<br />

arrangement, surrounded by phloem. That is attributed to the stele a hadrocentric<br />

structure (Fig. 4C).<br />

Cross sections of the rachis cut from 3-8 cm above the leaf petiole disclosed the<br />

same one-layered epidermis composed of cutinized-walled cells, covered by a thick<br />

cuticle, a cortex and a stele. The stele is monofascicular, composed of more or less T-<br />

shaped xylem vessels (meta- and protoxylem vessels) characteristic to most of the<br />

Aspleniaceae species (O g u r a 1972, B i r 1957; B e r c u 2004, 2005). Phloem<br />

surrounds the xylem elements as well (Fig. 5). Toward the subterminal leaf rachis<br />

remarkable is the reduced number of the vascular elements, surrounded by phloem<br />

and embedded in a homogenous mesophyll (Fig. 5A, C). The vascular elements are in<br />

a reduced number because of the veins marginal segments formation. Under the lower<br />

and upper epiderms of the rachis, sclerenchyma cells are present. They provide<br />

mechanical support to the weak and delicate rachis tip. A typical hypodermis is<br />

absent.<br />

Fig. 5 Cross section of the leaf rachis (3-8 cm<br />

above the leaf rachis), x 300.<br />

A. trichomanes-ramosum vegetative organs anatomy exhibits variations in the<br />

vascular system organization. The even and odd number of the vascular bundles<br />

(meristeles) may depend by the plant size, and organs diameter, the plant habitat<br />

ecotope and the cutting level. The mathematical distribution function takes into<br />

account of the ecological parameters such as soil humidity (U), temperature (T) and<br />

soil reaction – pH (R) (Table 1) settled by P o p e s c u and S a n d a (1998). The<br />

distribution function was based on S ă h l e a n u (1957), C e a p o i u (1968), S i r e ţ chi<br />

(1985) and N a s t a s e s c u et al. (1988) works.


14<br />

Natura Montenegrina, 6/2007<br />

The root (r) – the diameter = 0,1-0,5 mm:<br />

r<br />

N Aspl. t-r . = (2n+1) K (a+b+c) πD 2 = 5 ·10 · 3,14 · 0,44 2 30,3954<br />

= = 1,028 ≈ 1 stele<br />

4e h 29,6 29,6<br />

The rhizome (rz) – the diameter = 1-1,5cm:<br />

rz<br />

N Aspl. t-r = (2n+1) K (a+b+c) πD 2 3 ·10 · 3,14 · 1,26 2 149,55<br />

=<br />

= = 5,06 ≈ 5 meristeles<br />

4e h 29,6 29,6<br />

The rachis (rh) – the diameter = 0,5-1 mm:<br />

pt. base<br />

a. N Aspl. t-r. = 2n K (a+b+c) πD 2 = 2 ·2·10· 3,14 · 0,69 2 = 59,798<br />

4e h 29,6 29,6<br />

= 2,02 ≈ 2 meristeles<br />

rh<br />

b. N Aspl. t-r. = (2n +1) K (a+b+c) πD 2 = 3 ·10· 3,14 · 0,92 2 = 79,73 = 1,01 ≈ 1 meristele<br />

4e h 4 · 2,71 3 78,732<br />

Where:<br />

r, rz, pt. base, rh<br />

N Aspl. t-r.– the function distribution of the vascular bundles in root (r), rhizome<br />

(rz), petiole base (pt. base) and rachis (rh);<br />

h – the distance (in cm) between two succesive sections;<br />

D – the vegetative organs diameter of the plant (in mm);<br />

e – the natural logarithm base (e = 2, 718);<br />

K (a+b+c) – the ecological constant of the plant depending of: humidity (a),<br />

temperature (b) and soil reaction (c);<br />

n – the multiplication order;<br />

2n – the even number of the vascular bundles;<br />

2n+1 – the odd number of the vascular bundles.<br />

NOTE: it is sufficient the estimation of<br />

r, rz, pt. base, rh<br />

N As t-r.<br />

only for n=1 sau n=2 value.


15<br />

B e r c u : VARIATION IN THE ANATOMY OF THE VASCULAR SYSTEM …<br />

Table 1: The ecological preferences of A. trichomanes-ramosum<br />

The species<br />

Ecological parameters<br />

humidity<br />

(H)<br />

temperature<br />

(T)<br />

soil reaction<br />

(R)<br />

*The value of the<br />

ecological constant<br />

(K (a+b+c) )<br />

Asplenium<br />

trichomanesramosum<br />

L.<br />

mesohydrophyte<br />

4<br />

microtermous<br />

2<br />

Slightly neutroacidophilous<br />

4<br />

10<br />

CONCLUSIONS<br />

The successive cross sections, cut from the rhizome and the frond’s petiole and<br />

rachis of A. trichomanes-ramosum L. disclose variations in the vascular system<br />

structure. The root is of diarch type. The rhizome is a dictyostele with a variable<br />

number of meristeles due to the number of the foliar traces. The petiole base vascular<br />

system is bifascicular whereas from 2 cm above the petiole base up to the rachis tip<br />

the vascular system is monostelic, first X-shaped and then T-shaped (to the tip).<br />

These expected results based on any earlier research permited us to find a<br />

mathematical distribution function to estimate the number of the vascular bundles in<br />

the fern vegetative organs in accordance with the plant size, the organs diameter, the<br />

main habitat plant factors and the cutting level. The distribution formula can be<br />

extended to other members of this large group of plants.<br />

LITERATURE<br />

A N D R E I , M . (1978): Anatomia plantelor. - Didactic and Pedagogic Publishing House,<br />

Bucharest, p. 227-229 (in <strong>Rom</strong>anian).<br />

B E R C U , R . (1998): Anatomical Modifications of the Corm Stele in Fern Asplenium<br />

septentrionale (L.) Hoffm. - Forestry, Sumarstvo, Belgrade 1: 35-40.<br />

B E R C U , R . 2004: Anatomical Aspects of Asplenium adiantum-nigrum L. - J. of Biol. Res.,<br />

vol. 2: 57-61.<br />

B E R C U , R . 2005: Anatomy of Asplenium ruta muraria L. - Studia bot. hung., vol. 36: 16-20.<br />

B E R C U , R . 2006: Histoanatomy of the Vegetative Organs of some Polypodiales species. -<br />

Ex Ponto, Constantza, 232p (in <strong>Rom</strong>anian).<br />

B I E R H O R S T , D . W . 1971: Morphology of Vascular Plants. Collier - Macmillan Ldt.,<br />

Macmillan Co. London, New York, 296-298, 300-304.<br />

B I R , S . S . 1957: Stelar anatomy of indian Aspleniaceae, Abstract. - Proc. Ind. Sci. Congr.<br />

Association, Calcuta, 44: 232.


16<br />

Natura Montenegrina, 6/2007<br />

C E A P O I U , N . 1968: Statistics methods applied in agricultural and biological experiences.<br />

- Agro-Silvica Publishing House, Bucharest, p.201-203 (in <strong>Rom</strong>anian).<br />

C I O C Â R L A N , V . 2000: Ilustred Flora of <strong>Rom</strong>ania - Pteridophyta et Spermatophyta. II<br />

<strong>edition</strong>, Ceres, Bucharest, p.90-92 (in <strong>Rom</strong>anian).<br />

d e B A R Y , A . 1877: Verigleichende Anatomie der Vegetationsorgane der Phanerogamen<br />

und Farne. - W. Engelmann, Leipzig, p.238-349 (in German)<br />

K R O E M E R , K. 1903: Wurzelhaut, Hypodermis und Endodermis der Angiospermenwurzel. -<br />

Biblioth. Bot., 12: 151 (in German).<br />

NASTASESCU, C., TENA, M., ANDREI Gh. and OTRASANU, I.<br />

1988: Problems of Algebraical Structures. - Reip. Pop. <strong>Rom</strong>anian Acad., Bucharest,<br />

p.122-125 (in <strong>Rom</strong>anian).<br />

O G U R A , Y . 1938: Anatomie der Vegetationsorgane der Pteridophyten. In: Handbuch der<br />

Pflanzeanatomie, Gebrüder Borntraeger, Berlin, p.128-140 (in German).<br />

O G U R A , Y . 1972: Comparative Anatomy of Vegetative Organs of Pteridophytes, II <strong>edition</strong>,<br />

Gebrüder Borntraeger, Berlin, Stuttgart, p.313-512.<br />

P O P E S C U , A a n d S A N D A , V . 1998: The Summary of the Spontaneous<br />

Cormophytes from the <strong>Rom</strong>anian Flora. - Acta Bot Horti., Bucharest, p.4-7 (in <strong>Rom</strong>anian).<br />

R U S S O W , E . 1872: Vergleichende Untersuchungen betreffend die Histologie der<br />

vegetativen und sporenbildenden Organe und die Entwicklung der Sporen der Leitbündel-<br />

Kryptogamen. Mém. Acad. Imp. Sc., St. Petersbourg, Sér. VII, 19: 1-207 (in German).<br />

S A V U L E S C U , T . (editor in chief). 1952: Flora Reip. Pop. <strong>Rom</strong>anicae, vol. 1, Editio Acad.<br />

Reip. Pop. <strong>Rom</strong>anicae, Bucharest, p.130-133 (in <strong>Rom</strong>anian).<br />

S C H N E I D E R , H . 1996: The Root Anatomy of Ferns: a Comparative Study. - Pteridology<br />

in Perspective, Royal Botanical Garden, Kew, Whitstable, Litho Ltd., Whitstable, Kent:<br />

271-283.<br />

S I R E T C H I , G h . 1985: Differential and Integral Calculation (fundamental notions). -<br />

Enciclopedical and Stiintifical Publisher, Bucharest, p.325-326 (in <strong>Rom</strong>anian)<br />

W A T S O N , L . a n d M . J . D A L L W I T Z 2004: The Ferns (Filicopsida) of the British<br />

Isles. - Version: 28th November 2005. http://delta-intkey.com.<br />

Summary<br />

VARIATION IN THE ANATOMY OF THE VASCULAR SYSTEM<br />

OF ASPLENIUM TRICHOMANES-RAMOSUM L.<br />

In <strong>Rom</strong>ania Asplenium trichomanes-ramosum L. grows in shaded crevices of<br />

limestone boulders, cool and moist places, up to an altitude above 1800m. The goal of<br />

the research was to examine the anatomy of the adventitious root, rhizome, and<br />

frond’s petiole and rachis in order to find a mathematical distribution function to


17<br />

B e r c u : VARIATION IN THE ANATOMY OF THE VASCULAR SYSTEM …<br />

estimate the number of the vascular bundles in the fern vegetative organs in<br />

accordance with the plant morphology, habitat and the cutting level.<br />

The root, in cross section possesses a primary structure and the stele is a diarh<br />

one. Remarkable is the sclerenchimatous sheet around the stele (Fig. 1).<br />

Cross section of the rhizome discloses a single layered epidermis (Fig. 2A),<br />

cortex, differentiated into a sclerenchyma cortex and the inner cortex, the latter<br />

consisting of large parenchyma cells consisting of numerous starch grains followed by<br />

an amiliferous sheath (Fig. 2B). The stele is a dictyostele composed of a variable<br />

number of meristeles (in accordance with the number of foliar traces) each surrounded<br />

by its own endodermis and pericycle. Each meristeles is hadrocentric with a binary<br />

structure (metaxylem vessels towards the center and protoxylem elements facing the<br />

pericycle). The pith rays among the meristeles occur. The pith occupies the central<br />

area of the rhizome(Fig. 2B, C). The frond’s petiole and rachis were analyzed by serial<br />

cross sections (2 to 2 cm), distributed from the base up to the rachis tip. The petiole<br />

base vascular system is bifascicular whereas from 2 cm above the petiole base up to<br />

the rachis tip the vascular system is monostelic, first X-shaped and then T-shaped (to<br />

the tip). These expected results based on any earlier research permited us to find a<br />

mathematical distribution function to estimate the number of the vascular bundles in<br />

the fern vegetative organs in accordance with the plant size, the organs diameter, the<br />

main habitat plant factors and the cutting level.<br />

Received: 26. 11. 2007.


18<br />

Natura Montenegrina, 6/2007


NATURA MONTENEGRINA, PODGORICA, 6: 19-25<br />

EDRAIANTHUS DALMATICUS A.DC. (CAMPANULACEAE)<br />

IN MONTENEGRO<br />

Nada BUBANJA 1 , Vladimir S T E V A N O V I Ć 2 , Dmitar L A K U Š I Ć 2<br />

1 Natural History Museum of Montenegro, Podgorica, P.O. Box 374, 81000 Podgorica,<br />

Montenegro<br />

2 Institute of Botany and Botanical Garden, Faculty of Biology, University of Belgrade, Takovska<br />

43, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia<br />

Key words:<br />

Edraianthus dalmaticus,<br />

Budoške bare,<br />

Montenegro,<br />

flora,<br />

distribution,<br />

ecology<br />

SYNOPSIS<br />

Taxon Edrianthus dalmaticus A.DC. was found during<br />

the floristic investigations of wetlands of Budoške bare<br />

(reservoir Vrtac) locality in the vicinity of Nikšić, and it was<br />

the first confirmed record of the this plant species in<br />

Montenegro. Until now seven (sensu lato) or seventeen<br />

(sensu stricto) taxa of genus Edrianthus at the species and<br />

subspecies level has been found in Montenegro. Some<br />

suspicious literature data on presence of Edrianthus<br />

dalmaticus in Montenegro were cited in literature (Janchen<br />

1910, Hayek 1930, Rohlena 1942). In this paper we also<br />

presented the data about the characteristics of new locality,<br />

habitat and ecological preferences of Edrianthus dalmaticus<br />

A.DC. in Montengro.<br />

Ključne riječi:<br />

Edraianthus dalmaticus<br />

A.DC., Budoške bare,<br />

Crna Gora,<br />

flora,<br />

diverzitet,<br />

ekologija<br />

SINOPSIS<br />

EDRAIANTHUS DALMATICUS A.DC.<br />

(CAMPANULACEAE) U CRNOJ GORI<br />

Tokom florističkih istraživanja na lokalitetu Budoške<br />

bare (akumulacija Vrtac) u okolini Nikšića pronađen je takson<br />

Edrianthus dalmaticus A.DC. čime je po prvi put zabilježeno i<br />

potvrđeno prisustvo ove biljne vrste u Crnoj Gori. Do sada je<br />

na teritoriji <strong>Crne</strong> <strong>Gore</strong> zabilježeno prisustvo 7 (sensu lato)<br />

odnosno 17 taksona (sensu stricto) roda Edrianthus na nivou<br />

vrsta i podvrsta. U starijoj florističkoj literaturi za Crnu Goru<br />

se navode i neki sumnjivi podaci o prisustvu taksona<br />

Edrianthus dalmaticus A.DC. (Janchen 1910, Lakušić 1974,<br />

Hayek 1930, Rohlena 1942). U ovom radu dati su podaci o<br />

karakteristikama lokaliteta, staništa i ekologiji Edrianthus<br />

dalmaticusa A.DC. u Crnoj Gori.


20<br />

Natura Montenegrina, 6/2007<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

Genus Edraianthus DC. has its center of distribution in the Balkans and it<br />

represents one of the most prominent groups of endemic plants in this region.<br />

Additional disjunct parts of this group’s range are found in the Apennines, Sicily, and<br />

the Southern Carpathians.<br />

The widespread distribution of Edraianthus in the Balkans, and especially its<br />

high variability and differentiation along latitudinal and altitudinal range, defines it as<br />

one of the rare genera of the Balkan’s flora that was a subject of four monographs<br />

(W e t t s t e i n 1887, B e c k 1893, J a n c h e n 1910, L a k u š i ć 1974). In the last<br />

monograph and a couple of subsequent papers detailed systematic, phytogeographic<br />

and especially ecological investigations of this genus were provided and a new system<br />

of classification of edraianthoid campanulas was proposed (L a k u š i ć 1974, 1987,<br />

1988). Additionally, the family Campanulaceae was segregated by L a k u š i ć (2001)<br />

into a new family, Edraianthaceae, while the genus Edraianthus itself into several new<br />

genera: Protoedraianthus, Visiania, Horvatia, Edraianthus, and Blecicia (Lakušić<br />

1987, 1988, 2001).<br />

According to different authors the genus comprises between 13 (J a n c h e n<br />

1910) and 45 taxa (L a k u š i ć 1974, 1987, 1988, 1989) at the species and subspecies<br />

rank. The most significant recent floristic accounts, Flora Europaea (K u z m a n o v<br />

1976) and Med-Checklist (G r e u t e r et al. 1984), basically accept Janchen΄s concept,<br />

with restriction of number of species and subspecies within the genus between 10<br />

(K u z m a n o v 1976) and 14 (G r e u t e r et al. 1984).<br />

Genus Edraianthus has its center of distribution in the region of Montenegro with<br />

certainly recorded presence of 7 (sensu lato) that is 17 (sensu stricto) taxa at the<br />

species and subspecies rank (L a k u š i ć 1974, 1987, 1988, 1989). From widely<br />

comprehensible and generally accepted taxa on the territory of Montenegro these<br />

ones are present: E. tenuifolius (Waldst. & Kit.) A. DC., E. graminifolius (L.) A. DC.,<br />

E. tarae R. Lakušić, E. serpyllifolius (Vis.) A. DC., E. glisicii Černjavski & Soška,<br />

E. wettsteinii Haláscy & Baldaccii subsp. wettsteinii and E. wettsteinii subsp.<br />

lovcenicus E. Mayer & Blečić. Additionally, these subspecies are present on the<br />

territory of Montenegro E. glisicii subsp. majae R. Lakušić and E. serpyllifolius<br />

subsp. pilosulus (Beck) R. Lakušić, as well as taxa E. jugoslavicus R. Lakušić<br />

subsp. jugoslavicus, E. jugoslavicus subsp. subalpinus R. Lakušić, E. caricinus<br />

Schott, Nyman, & Kotschy, E. montenegrinus Horak, E. vesovicii R. Lakušić and E.<br />

zogovicii R. Lakušić which according to some authors belong to the widely accepted<br />

taxon E. graminifolius (L.) A. DC. sensu lato (J a n c h e n 1910, K u z m a n o v 1976,<br />

G r e u t e r et al. 1984). In order to avoid nomenclature confusion the concept of<br />

unique genus Edraianthus has been used in this supplement.<br />

Except of the aforesaid taxa in older floristic literature, some suspected data<br />

about the presence of the species E. dalmaticus A. DC in Montenegro are mentioned.<br />

The first information on the presence of this species in Montenegro was published by


21<br />

Bubanja, Stevanović, Lakušić: EDRAIANTHUS DALMATICUS A.DC. (CAMPANULACEAE)<br />

J a n c h e n (1910: 8) which quotes the information from Reiser’s herbarium in<br />

Sarajevo Museum: “Zweifelhafte Standortangaben: Duga-Pässe in Montenegro<br />

(Reiser, H. Sarajev.)”, giving a commentary on these suspicious data. Lakušić in his<br />

monograph (1974: 17), cited probably the same herbarium specimen, for this species<br />

states “U Dugom polju (Reiser - Herb. SARA)”; However, he has correctly situated this<br />

locality not in Montenegro but in Dugo polje in Herzegovina. The data about the<br />

controversial presence of the species E. dalmaticus in Montenegro were mentioned<br />

by H a y e k (1930), R o h l e n a (1942) and L a k u š i ć (1974). Based on Janchen’s<br />

monograph, Hayek in his "Prodromus" states for this species “In rupibus subalpinis et<br />

alpinis. Da. BH. Mt?” (H a y e k 1930: 561). In addition, Rohlena refering to Baldacci’s<br />

data states ”In humidis silvat. Ad veterem typographiam pr. Rijeka (Ba). Sec. cl.<br />

Hayek dubius” (R o h l e n a 1942: 353). Lastly, a very interesting statement on general<br />

distribution of the species E. dalmaticus can be found in Lakušić’s monograph: ”...<br />

Additionally, there was interfering of materials from quite distant places in some<br />

herbarium sheets, which were probably compared and left in the same sheet, but they<br />

belong to different species, as it is the case with Reiser’s material, which refers to this<br />

species in the surrounding of Rijeka Crnojevića in Montenegro” (L a k u š i ć 1974: 18).<br />

During the recent field investigations and collecting material for floristic study of<br />

wet meadows in surrounding of Nikšić, E. dalmaticus was recorded and confirmed for<br />

the first time in Montenegro.<br />

RESULTS<br />

DISTRIBUTION AND ECOLOGY<br />

The species E. dalmaticus was discovered in the locality Budoške bare<br />

(reservoir Vrtac) which is situated in the S.E. Montenegro that is in the south part of<br />

Nikšićko Polje (Fig. 1, 2). Budoške bare occupies the area of 13,42 km², on the<br />

altitude of 615 m.a.s.l.. To the west part of Budoške bare there is the reservoir Slano,<br />

to its north part it is Kapino polje, to the south there is mountain Budoš and to the east<br />

suburb Straševina. Waters which run through the channel from Slano reservoir and<br />

Krupac reservoir as well as from the Zeta River have the main role in the hidrography<br />

of this region. During the period of haevy precipitations, from October to the end of<br />

May, huge amounts of waters from the channel and the Zeta river form a temporary<br />

reservoir Vrtac which overflows the surrounding meadows. Budoške bare is influenced<br />

by sumediterranean climate. Limnoglacial sediments occupy a wide space in Budoške<br />

bare and they are represented with gravel, sand and clay. Deep, brown, clay-loamy,<br />

lessivage meaedow soils and terrains are dominant in this region.


22<br />

Natura Montenegrina, 6/2007<br />

Fig 1. Herbarium specimen of E. dalmaticus A.DC. – coll. Montenegro, Nikšić, Budoške bare<br />

(42º45.214 N, 18º53.163 E), wet meadows, 615 m (Bubanja, N. 26560, 14.6.2006, BEOU).


23<br />

Bubanja, Stevanović, Lakušić: EDRAIANTHUS DALMATICUS A.DC. (CAMPANULACEAE)<br />

Voucher specimens:<br />

- Montenegro, Nikšić, Budoške bare (42º45.214 N, 18º53.163 E), wet meadows,<br />

615 m (Bubanja, N., 14.6.2006, Seed plants collection Natural History Museum of<br />

Montenegro)<br />

- Montenegro, Nikšić, Budoške bare (42º45.214 N, 18º53.163 E), wet meadows,<br />

615 m (Bubanja, N. 26560, 14.6.2006, BEOU)<br />

Edraianthus dalmaticus is endemic species (Fig. 2) distributed in Croatia<br />

(Dalmatia - Drniš, Dolac, Klis, Mosor, Povilo, Promina, Solin, Knin, Vrlika, Muć),<br />

Bosnia and Herzegovina (Duvanjsko polje, Glamočko polje, Livanjsko polje, Drvar-<br />

Drobnjak, Dugo polje, Čaprazlije, Donje Bare, Lištica – Posušje, Podklečani)<br />

(B j e l č i ć , M a y e r 1983, J a n c h e n 1910, L a k u š i ć 1974, Flora Croatica<br />

Database 2004) and Montenegro (Budoške bare near Nikšić). It could be designated<br />

as dinaric floristic element of adriatic submediterranean province.<br />

Fig. 2. Distribution of<br />

Edraianthus dalmaticus (UTM<br />

Grid zone 34; spot correspond<br />

with basic square10 x 10 km).<br />

Arrow indicate new locality in<br />

Montenegro. ? indicate<br />

suspicious literature data on<br />

presence of E. dalmaticus in<br />

the surrounding of Rijeka<br />

Crnojevića in Montenegro<br />

(Abbreviation: Cro – Croatia,<br />

BH – Bosnia and Herzegovina,<br />

Mtg – Montenegro)


24<br />

Natura Montenegrina, 6/2007<br />

THREAT<br />

According to its endemic distribution, as well as the fact that species inhabits<br />

very fragile periodically flooded karst meadows, it is as a Rare (R) species included in<br />

Global IUCN Red List of Threatened Plants (W a l t e r , G i l l e t t 1998). Also as<br />

European endemics (species for which the total (global) distribution is restricted to<br />

Europe), as well as species included in Global IUCN Red lists, E. dlamaticus is<br />

defined as “target species” or “species of European importance” (O z i n g a ,<br />

S c h a m i n é e 2005).<br />

In addition, E. dalmaticus is defined as highly protected species in Croatia<br />

(Anonymus 2006), as well as in the category DD - data deficient included into Croatian<br />

Red Book (N i k o l i ć , Topić , 2005), while according to Š i l i ć (1996) it has the<br />

status of vulnerable (V) threatened species in Bosnia and Herzegovina.<br />

LITERATURE<br />

ANONYMUS 2006: Pravilnik o proglašavanju divljih svojti zaštićenim i strogo<br />

zaštićenim (16. 1. 2006.), Narodne novine (7), Zagreb.<br />

BECK G. 1893: Die Gattung Hedraeanthus. - Wiener Illustrierte Garten-Zeitung 18:<br />

287-299.<br />

BJELČIĆ, Ž., MAYER, E. 1983: Edraianthus A. DC. - In: Bjelčić, Ž. (ed.), Flora Bosnae<br />

et Hercegovinae. IV Simpetalae. Pars 4: 54-56, Sarajevo, Štamparija Trebinje<br />

188 pp.<br />

Flora Croatica Database 2004: - Botanički zavod, PMF, Sveučilište u Zagrebu,<br />

http://hirc.botanic.hr<br />

GREUTER W. and T. RAUS. 1983: Med-Checklist Notulae, 8. - Willdenovia 13: 277-<br />

288.<br />

HAYEK A. 1930: Prodromus Florae peninsulae Balcanicae 2. Repertorium Speciorum<br />

novarum Regni vegetabilis, Beihefte 30(2): 337-576.<br />

JANCHEN E. 1910: Edraianthus-Arten der Balkanländer. - Mitteilungen des<br />

Naturwissenschaftlichen Vereines an der Universität Wien 8: 1-40.<br />

KUZMANOV B. 1976: Edraianthus A. DC. Pp. 99-100 in Flora Europea. Vol. 4,<br />

Plantaginaceae to Compositae (and Rubiaceae), eds. Tutin T. G., V. H.<br />

Heywood, N. A. Burges, D. M. Moore, D. H. Valentine, S. M. Walters and D. A.<br />

Webb. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.<br />

LAKUŠIĆ R. 1974: Prirodni sistem populacija vrsta roda Edraianthus DC. Godišnjak<br />

Biološkog Instituta u Sarajevu 26: 1-129.<br />

LAKUŠIĆ R. 2001: Phytodiversity of the Order Campanulales Juss. in Montenegro.<br />

Pp. 70 in Prirodni potencijali kopna, kontinentalnih voda i mora <strong>Crne</strong> <strong>Gore</strong> i<br />

njihova zaštita. Plenarni referati i izvodi iz saopštenja sa naučnog skupa,<br />

Žabljak 20 -23. 9. 2001. Book of Abstracts, ed. Regner S. Podgorica: Institut za


25<br />

Bubanja, Stevanović, Lakušić: EDRAIANTHUS DALMATICUS A.DC. (CAMPANULACEAE)<br />

biologiju mora Kotor & Republički zavod za zaštitu prirode <strong>Crne</strong> <strong>Gore</strong> -<br />

Podgorica.<br />

LOVRIĆ A. Š., RAC, M. 1987: Doprinos fitogeografiji Svilaje i njezina povezanot sa<br />

Biokovom. Acta Biokovica 4: 189-204.<br />

NIKOLIĆ, T., TOPIĆ, J. eds. 2005: Crvena knjiga vaskularne flore Hrvatske. -<br />

Ministarstvo kulture, Državni zavod za zaštitu prirode, Zagreb. 693pp.<br />

OZINGA, W.A. & SCHAMINÉE, J.H.J. (eds.). 2005: Target Species – Species of<br />

European Concern. A database driven selection of plant and animal species for<br />

the implementation of the Pan European Ecological Network. Wageningen,<br />

Alterra, Alterra-report 1119. 193 pages; 30 figs.; 18 tables; 134 refs.<br />

ROHLENA, J. 1942: Conspectus Florae Montenegrinae. - Preslia 20-21: 1-506.<br />

ŠILIĆ, Č. 1996: Spisak biljnih vrsta (Pteridophyta i Spermatophyta) za Crvenu knjigu<br />

Bosna i Hercegovine - Glasnik Zemaljskog <strong>muzej</strong>a Bosne i Hercegovine<br />

(Prirodne nauke), Nov. ser. 31: 323-367.<br />

WALTER, K.S. & H.J. GILLETT (eds.) (1998) 1997 IUCN Red List of Threatened<br />

Plants. Compiled by the World Conservation Monitoring Centre. IUCN - The<br />

World Conservation Union, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK.<br />

WETTSTEIN R. 1887: Monographie der Gattung Hedraeanthus. Denkschr. kais. Akad.<br />

Wissensch. math.-natur. Classe 53: 185-212.<br />

Received: 27. 11. 2007.


26<br />

Natura Montenegrina, 6/2007


NATURA MONTENEGRINA, PODGORICA, 6: 27-30<br />

Onosma pseudoarenaria Schur. ssp. tridentina (Wettst.) Br.- Bl., NEW TAXON IN<br />

FLORA OF MONTENEGRO<br />

Nada BUBANJA¹, Snežana VUKSANOVIĆ ¹<br />

¹Natural History Museum of Montenegro, Podgorica, Montenegro<br />

Кеy words:<br />

Nikšićka Župa,<br />

Montenegro,<br />

taxon<br />

SYNOPSIS<br />

During the floristic researches of Niksicka Zupa, a<br />

taxon Onosma pseudoarenaria Schur.ssp.tridentina (Wettst.)<br />

Br.- Bl. was found and it was the first time to find this taxon<br />

in Montenegrin flora. The flora of Europe connects the<br />

species Onosma tridentina Wettst. to Italy, but it suspects<br />

that it might have spread out on the territory of ex-<br />

Yugoslavia. Med-Check list, as well as the Flora of Europe,<br />

suspects that this taxon can be found on the territory of ex-<br />

Yugoslavia. In the electronic database of Croatian flora one<br />

can find this taxon under the name Onosma pseudoarenaria<br />

ssp.tridentina (highly protected species), and in that way its<br />

presence has been confirmed on the territory of Croatia. By<br />

this finding the presence of Onosma pseudoarenaria Schur.<br />

ssp.tridentina (Wettst.) Br.- Bl. on the territory of Montenegro<br />

has been confirmed and it represents the second finding of<br />

this taxon on the territory of ex-Yugoslavia.<br />

Ključne riječi:<br />

Nikšićka Župa,<br />

Crna Gora,<br />

takson<br />

SINOPSIS<br />

Onosma pseudoarenaria Schur. ssp. tridentina (Wettst.) Br.-<br />

Bl., NOVI TAKSON U FLORI CRNE GORE<br />

Tokom florističkih istraživanja Nikšićke Župe pronađen<br />

je takson Onosma pseudoarenaria ssp.tridentina (Wettst.)<br />

Br.- Bl. što je prvi nalaz ovog taksona u flori <strong>Crne</strong> <strong>Gore</strong>. Flora<br />

Evrope vrstu Onosma tridentina Wettst. navodi za Italiju, pri<br />

čemu izražava sumnju u njeno rasprostranjenje na teritoriji<br />

bivše Jugoslavije. Med-Check lista kao i Flora Evrope sumnja<br />

u nalaz ovog taksona na području bivše Jugoslavije. U<br />

elektronskoj bazi podataka flore Hrvatske naveden je ovaj<br />

takson kao Onosma pseudoarenaria ssp.tridentina (strogo<br />

zaštićena biljka) čime je potvrđeno njeno prisustvo na<br />

teritoriji Hrvatske. Ovim nalazom potvrđeno je prisustvo<br />

Onosma pseudoarenaria ssp.tridentina na teritoriji <strong>Crne</strong> <strong>Gore</strong><br />

što je ujedno I drugi nalaz ovog taksona za prostor bivše<br />

Jugoslavije.


28<br />

Natura Montenegrina, 6/2007<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

Nikšićka Župa is situated in the south-west part of Montenegro. It occupies the<br />

area of 40 km 2 , and with its broader mountain hinterland and brim 210 km 2 . A diversity<br />

of flora and vegetation of this region is caused by the influence of Mediterranean and<br />

continental climate as well as high mountains (Maganik, Stitovo and Prekornica) which<br />

surround Nikšićka Župa. Nikšićka Župa is situated east of Nikšić.<br />

MATERIAL AND METHODS<br />

Floristic researches of Nikšićka Župa were carried out in period August, 2000 to<br />

September 2003. The subspecies represented in this paper was collected in June<br />

2002, and the vouchers are entrusted to the collection of Natural History Museum of<br />

Montenegro. The basic literature used for determination of this taxon was: Flora<br />

Europea (L.1972) and Med-Check list (G r e u t e r , B u r d e t & L o n g 1984).<br />

Photographs of the species (fig.1) and habitation (fig.2) where the plant was collected<br />

from are given in this paper .<br />

Fig.1: Onosma pseudoarenaria Schur.<br />

ssp. tridentina (Wettst.) Br.- Bl.


29<br />

Bubanja, Vuksanović: Onosma pseudoarenaria Schur. ssp. tridentina (Wettst.) . . .<br />

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION<br />

During the floristic researches of Nikšićka Župa, a subspecies Onosma<br />

pseudoarenaria ssp.tridentina (Wettst.) Br.- Bl was found. That is the first finding of<br />

this taxon in Montenegro. A small population was recorded on only one locality<br />

(Preserve of King Nikola-Morakovske bare). The plant grows in open, dry and rocky<br />

habitation in beech forest. Genus Onosma L. is represented with 33 species in Flora<br />

of Europe. According to the existing data, these species have been registered on the<br />

territory of Montenegro: O. stellulatum W.K., O. Aucherianum DC. ssp. Javorkae<br />

(SIMK.) HAY., O. arenarium W.K. and O. Visianii CLEM (R o h l e n a 1942).<br />

H a y e k (1924-1933) did not record the presence of this species on the Balkan<br />

Peninsula. Flora Europea as well as Med-Check List mentions this subspecies only for<br />

Italy, doubting upon its spreading on the territory of ex-Yugoslavia. This subspecies<br />

was not recorded in the regional flora of Croatia (D o m a c 1994), whereas in<br />

electronic database of Croatian flora it is recorded as a highly protected species.<br />

Fig.2: Habitation where the plant was collected from.<br />

CONCLUSION<br />

A finding of Onosma pseudoarenaria ssp.tridentina (Wettst.) Br.- BL. in<br />

Nikšićka Župa clearly confirm its presence in the Balkan Peninsula. In relation to Flora<br />

Europae and Med Check List this record significantly extends the subspecies range<br />

towards the south-east.


30<br />

Natura Montenegrina, 6/2007<br />

LITERATURE<br />

BUBANJA, N. 2004: Flora vlažnih i vodenih staništa Nikšićke Župe. Specijalistički<br />

rad.Biološki fakultet,Beograd (manuscr.), 86pp.<br />

GREUTER W., BURDET H. M., LONG G., 1984: Med-Check List. Vol. 1., Geneve &<br />

Berlin, 109-110<br />

PIGNATTI S. 1982: Flora d' Italia 2. - Edagricole, 400-402.<br />

PULEVIĆ, V. 2005: Građa za vaskularnu floru <strong>Crne</strong> <strong>Gore</strong>. Dopuna "Conspectus florae<br />

montenegrinae" J. Rohlene., knjiga 2, Republički zavod za zaštitu prirode <strong>Crne</strong><br />

<strong>Gore</strong>, Podgorica, 218pp.<br />

ROHLENA, J. 1942: Conspectus florae Montenegrine. -Presila (Praha) 20-21: 254pp.<br />

TUTIN, T.G., BURGES, N. A., CHATER, A. O., EDMONDS, J. R., HEYWOOD, V. H.,<br />

MOORE, D. M., VALENTINE, D. H., WALTERS, S. M. & WEBB, D. A., 1993:<br />

Flora Europaea. Vol. 3. - Cambridge, 89-94.<br />

Received: 27. 11. 2007.


NATURA MONTENEGRINA, PODGORICA, 6: 31-52<br />

CONTRIBUTION TO THE KNOWLEDGE OF THE FLOWERING PHENOLOGY AND<br />

SEX EXPRESSION IN Acer monspessulanum L. FROM MONTENEGRO<br />

Rajko T R I P I Ć 1)<br />

1)<br />

Republic Institute for the Protection of Nature of Montenegro, Podgorica, Trg vojvode Bećir<br />

bega Osmanagića 16, Podgorica, Crna Gora<br />

Кеy words:<br />

Flowering phenology,<br />

sex expression,<br />

Acer monspessulanum<br />

SYNOPSIS<br />

The paper contains results of research of flowering<br />

phenology and sex expression of flowers, inflorescences and<br />

individual trees of Acer monspessulanum consecutively for<br />

seven years on 40 marked trees from 2 local populations<br />

near Nikšić. The flowers were morphologically false<br />

bisexually and functionally unisexual (male or female). The<br />

male flowers had very small, rudimentary pistil (unfunctional)<br />

with normally developed stamens (yellow with functional<br />

anthers on long filaments). The female flowers had normally<br />

developed pistil and unripe stamens (the anthers are green,<br />

hard and unfunctional, and filaments are very short).<br />

Ključne riječi:<br />

Fenologija cvjetanja,<br />

polna ekspresija,<br />

Acer monspessulanum<br />

SINOPSIS<br />

PRILOG POZNAVANJU FENOLOGIJE CVJETANJA I<br />

POLNE EKSPRESIJE U ACER MONSPESSULANUM L. IZ<br />

CRNE GORE<br />

U radu su dati rezultati istraživanja fenologije cvjetanja<br />

i polne ekspresije cvjetova, cvati i individualnih stabala Acer<br />

monspessulanum uzastopnotokom sedam godina na 40<br />

markiranih stabala iz dvije lokalne populacije blizu Nikšića.<br />

Cvjetovi su bili morfološki lažno dvopolni a funkcionalno<br />

jednopolni (muški ili ženski). Muški cvjetovi su imali vrlo mali,<br />

rudimentarni tučak (nefunkcionalan) sa normalno razvijenim<br />

prašnicima (žuti sa funkcionalnim anterama na dugačkim<br />

filamentima), a ženski cvjetovi su imali dobro razvijen tučak i<br />

nezrele prašnike (sa zelenim, tvrdim i nefunkcionalnim<br />

anterama na vrlo kratkim filamentima).


32<br />

Natura Montenegrina, 6/2007<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

Morphological and functional variations in the sexuality of Acer flowers were<br />

studied by many explorers. P a x (1885), monographer of Acer genus, said that flowers<br />

of Acer monspessulanum are andro-monoecious. P o j a r k o v a (1933), also<br />

monographer of Acer genus said that flowers of A. monspessulanum are male and false<br />

bisexual. Z a m j a t n i n (1958) said that flowers of A. monspessulanum are male with<br />

stamens and female with pistil and reduced stamens. G u d e s k i & D r e n k o v s k i<br />

(1978) said that flowers of A. monspessulanum are functionally unisexual independently<br />

from development of sexual organs of the opposite sex. Male flowers do not have pistil,<br />

and if there is pistil it is reduced and sterile. Female flowers have well-developed<br />

stamens but their anthers do not grow-up, half-anthers do not open and they produce<br />

sterile pollen. P a l a m a r e v (1979) said that flowers of A. monspessulanum are<br />

bisexual and unisexual.<br />

MATERIAL AND METHODS<br />

Flowering phenology and sexual expression of flowers, inflorescences and trees<br />

of Acer monspessulanum were observed consecutively in period of 7 years on marked<br />

trees (40 trees) in 2 local populations (SUBICA and GREBICE) near NIKŠIĆ. Sexuality<br />

of the flowers was determined on base of their sexual organs functionality. During full<br />

anthesis of the flowers all flowers had normally developed stamens and non-welldeveloped<br />

pistils (rudimentary or abortive pistil) are considered to be male. Criteria for<br />

female flowers is incompetence for releasing pollen, and in case of releasing pollen<br />

such flowers are considered to be bisexual. The criteria for a female flower will be the<br />

inability to release pollen. In case of pollen release, fertile or not, the flowers will be<br />

considered as bisexual. Such the opinion represents contemporary monographer of<br />

Acer genus J o n g (1976). The sexual expression of the inflorescences is determined<br />

on base of classification of inflorescences according to type of their flowering (W i t t r o<br />

c k 1886; modified by C o r r e n s 1928; taken from J o n g 1976) and numeral<br />

relationships between male and female flowers in the inflorescences is observed in<br />

specimen of 30 randomly taken inflorescences for every individual tree and every<br />

specific year of observation. Phenophases: swelling of buds, opening of buds and<br />

flowering were determined according to recommendations (B e j d e m a n 1979).


33<br />

Tripić: CONTRIBUTION TO THE KNOWLEDGE OF THE FLOWERING PHENOLOGY . . .<br />

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION<br />

All analysed trees were monoecious plants. The male and female flowers are both<br />

placed on the same inflorescence. The male flowers had very small, rudimentary pistil<br />

(unfunctional) with normally developed stamens (yellow with functional anthers on long<br />

filaments). The female flowers had normally developed pistil and unripe stamens (the<br />

anthers are green, hard and unfunctional, and filaments are very short). We find similar<br />

results with G u d e s k i & D r e n k o v s k i (1978). T r i p i ć (2006) presented very<br />

similar results for Acer obtusatum Waldst. & Kit.. It is observed, but very rarely (on 5<br />

trees), that during the flowering 1-2 almost normally developed female flowers were<br />

transformed into functionally male flowers with illusory normal pistil but with abortive<br />

ovary. Such flowers are morphological illusory bisexual but in fact they are functionally<br />

unisexual male flowers.<br />

Phenophase of flowering in observed populations begins in time interval from 9 th<br />

March to 14 th April (Stubica) and 25 th March to 13 th April (Grebice) and lasts from 8 to 49<br />

days in population (Stubica) and 27 to 47 days (Grebice), depending on weather<br />

(especially temperature), number of flowering trees and volume of flowering of each<br />

tree (Tab. 2., 3. and Graph. 2., 4.). The end of flowering varied from 8 th April to 5 th May<br />

(Stubica) and 4 th May to 18 th May (Grebice). Massive and rich flowering of trees in this<br />

populations was every the third year (Tab. 2. and Graph. 2., 4.) followed with 2 years of<br />

weak or very little flowering (small number of flowering trees and often very small<br />

number of flowering inflorescences and flowers). The annual flowering rhythmic is very<br />

similar in observed populations while the rhythmic between observed trees was<br />

significantly differentiated (Table 2. and Graph. 1., 2., 3., 4.). Individual tree flowered<br />

depending on ecological conditions and richness of flowering from 3 to 28 days (<br />

Stubica) and 2 to 29 days (Grebice) and all analysed trees of observed populations<br />

depending also of ecological conditions, number of flowered trees and volume of<br />

flowering of every tree lasted from 8 to 49 days (Tab. 2., Graph. 1., 2.,3.,4.). Also, for<br />

individual trees it is determined that there is greater or lower variation of duration of<br />

flowering in observed years, depending on ecological conditions and volume of<br />

flowering of that tree (when volume of flowering is low when number of flowering<br />

inflorescences on tree is small than phenophases of such trees starts later and lasts<br />

significantly shorter, and their inflorescences have smaller number of flowering types,<br />

so the tree has at that time narrower sexual expression than in years of rich flowering<br />

(Graph. 1., 2., 3., 4.).


34<br />

Natura Montenegrina, 6/2007<br />

Table 1. The phenophases: Swelling of the buds and opening of the buds in observed<br />

populations of Acer monspessulanum L.<br />

Population<br />

Year<br />

Swelling of the buds<br />

Opening of the buds<br />

Start Massive Start Massive<br />

STUBICA<br />

1998.<br />

1999.<br />

2000.<br />

2001.<br />

2002.<br />

2003.<br />

2004.<br />

18. 2. – 6. 4.<br />

9.3. – 17. 4.<br />

30. 3. – 19. 4.<br />

14. 2. – 18. 3.<br />

16. 3. – 15. 4.<br />

27. 2. – 18. 4.<br />

21. 2. – 1. 4.<br />

1. 3. – 19. 4.<br />

16. 3. – 22. 4.<br />

15. 4. – 25. 4.<br />

11. 3. – 29. 3.<br />

6. 4. – 25. 4.<br />

16. 3. – 30. 4.<br />

13. 3. - 8. 4.<br />

3. 3. – 13. 4.<br />

24. 3. – 24. 3.<br />

11. 4. – 24. 4.<br />

15. 3. – 7. 4.<br />

26. 3. – 26. 4.<br />

26. 3. – 30. 4.<br />

19. 3. – 6. 4.<br />

12. 3. – 27. 4.<br />

29. 3. – 26. 4.<br />

19. 4. – 29. 4.<br />

19. 3. – 7. 4.<br />

13. 4. – 28. 4.<br />

1. 4. – 3. 5.<br />

23. 3. – 11. 4.<br />

GREBICE<br />

1998.<br />

1999.<br />

2000.<br />

2001.<br />

2002.<br />

2003.<br />

2004.<br />

6. 3. – 24. 4.<br />

25. 3. – 26. 4.<br />

2. 4. – 21. 4.<br />

18. 2. – 31. 3.<br />

10. 3. – 13. 4.<br />

6.3.(21.1.)– 22.4.<br />

28. 2. – 29. 3.<br />

20. 3. – 28. 4.<br />

1. 4. – 29. 4.<br />

19. 4. – 30. 4.<br />

11. 3. – 7. 4.<br />

28. 3. – 28. 4.<br />

29. 3. – 2. 5.<br />

20. 3. – 10. 4.<br />

3. 4. – 1. 5.<br />

3. 4. – 1. 5.<br />

10. 4. – 28. 4.<br />

18. 3. – 8. 4.<br />

27. 3. – 27. 4.<br />

8.4.(28.1.)- 28.4.<br />

28. 3. – 11. 4.<br />

7. 4. – 4. 5.<br />

8. 4. – 4. 5.<br />

21. 4. – 3. 5.<br />

25. 3. – 18. 4.<br />

6. 4. – 2. 5.<br />

14. 4. – 5. 5.<br />

30. 3. – 17. 4.<br />

All male flowers of individual trees flowered at lest 2 days and at most 22 days,<br />

and female flowering at least 1 day and at most 11 days (Tab. 3., Graph. 2., 4.). It is<br />

determined that phenophases of flowering of male flowers at all protandrous trees and<br />

at most of protogynous trees it is significantly longer from phenophases of flowering of<br />

female flowers, while such phases at only several protogynous trees has similar period<br />

of lasting or it is phenophases of flowering of female flowers were longer from<br />

phenophases of flowering of male flowers (Graph. 2., 4.). T r i p i ć (2006) presented<br />

very similar results for A. obtusatum while results for A campestre and A. platanoides<br />

(in press) he presented that they had good and very good flowering intensity<br />

consequently for several years followed with one or two years of weak and very weak<br />

flowering. That shows that species which taxonomically belong to the same section<br />

have very similar phenology of flowering while the phenology of flowering to the species<br />

from different sections is different.


35<br />

Tripić: CONTRIBUTION TO THE KNOWLEDGE OF THE FLOWERING PHENOLOGY . . .<br />

Table 2. The phenophase of flowering in the observed populations of Acer<br />

monspessulanum L.<br />

Population<br />

Year<br />

Flowering of the individual trees<br />

Flowering of the observed population<br />

Start Massive The end Start Massive The end<br />

STUBICA 1998.<br />

1999.<br />

2000.<br />

2001.<br />

2002.<br />

2003<br />

2004.<br />

9. 3.– 14. 4.<br />

30. 3.–18. 4.<br />

14. 4.–20. 4.<br />

19. 3.–10. 4.<br />

1. 4. – 1. 4.<br />

1. 4. –18. 4.<br />

24. 3. – 9. 4.<br />

14. 3.–16. 4.<br />

1. 4. –10. 4.<br />

- - - - - - - -<br />

21. 3. – 1. 4.<br />

- - - - - - - -<br />

4. 4. –17. 4.<br />

27. 3. – 8. 4.<br />

5. 4. – 26. 4.<br />

8. 4. – 24. 4.<br />

16. 4.–22. 4.<br />

4. 4. – 20. 4.<br />

7. 4. – 8. 4.<br />

20. 4.– 5. 5.<br />

9. 4. – 23. 4.<br />

9. 3.<br />

30. 3.<br />

14. 4.<br />

19. 3.<br />

1. 4.<br />

1. 4.<br />

24. 3.<br />

30. 3.-13. 4.*<br />

- - - - - - - - -<br />

- - - - - - - - -<br />

24. 3. – 13. 4.<br />

- - - - - - - - -<br />

- - - - - - - - -<br />

1. 4. – 17. 4.<br />

26. 4.<br />

24. 4.<br />

22. 4.<br />

20. 4.<br />

8. 4.<br />

5. 5.<br />

23. 4.<br />

GREBICE 1998.<br />

1999.<br />

2000.<br />

2001.<br />

2002.<br />

2003.<br />

2004.<br />

4. 4. –25. 4.<br />

6. 4. –27. 4.<br />

13. 4.–28. 4.<br />

25. 3.–19. 4.<br />

2. 4. – 1. 5.<br />

13. 4. – 1. 5.<br />

3. 4. –16. 4.<br />

8. 4. –20. 4.<br />

9. 4. –30. 4.<br />

16. 4.–27. 4.<br />

28. 3.–12. 4.<br />

4. 5. – 4. 5.<br />

16. 4.–28. 4.<br />

6. 4. –18. 4.<br />

14. 4. - 5. 5.<br />

15. 4. – 9. 5.<br />

27. 4.–14. 5.<br />

13. 4. – 5. 5.<br />

19. 4.–18. 5.<br />

22. 4. – 9. 5.<br />

16. 4. – 4. 5.<br />

4. 4.<br />

6. 4.<br />

13. 4.<br />

25. 3.<br />

2. 4.<br />

13. 4.<br />

3. 4.<br />

14. 4.–27. 4.*<br />

14. 4.– 2. 5.*<br />

21. 4.– 3. 5.*<br />

1. 4. – 21. 4.<br />

- - - - - - - - -<br />

- - - - - - - - -<br />

5. 4. – 25. 4.<br />

5. 5.<br />

9. 5.<br />

14. 5.<br />

5. 5.<br />

18. 5.<br />

9. 5.<br />

4. 5.<br />

Legend: * = semimassive; - - - - = non-flowering<br />

Table 3. The duration of flowering of the observed individual trees and populations of<br />

Acer monspessulanum L. (in days).<br />

Population<br />

Year<br />

The individual tree<br />

Population<br />

All ♂ flowers All ♀ flowers All flowers The observed tree (Total)<br />

STUBICA<br />

1998.<br />

1999.<br />

2000.<br />

2001.<br />

2002.<br />

2003.<br />

2004.<br />

3 – 22<br />

4 – 21<br />

2 – 5<br />

2 – 19<br />

3 – 3<br />

4 – 19<br />

6 – 15<br />

2 – 10<br />

1 – 11<br />

1 – 3<br />

2 – 8<br />

3 – 3<br />

1 – 9<br />

2 – 7<br />

6 – 28<br />

5 – 23<br />

3 – 7<br />

3 – 26<br />

7 – 8<br />

8 – 26<br />

12 - 22<br />

49<br />

26<br />

11<br />

33<br />

8<br />

35<br />

31<br />

GREBICE<br />

1998.<br />

1999.<br />

2000.<br />

2001.<br />

2002.<br />

2003.<br />

2004.<br />

2 – 18<br />

2 – 20<br />

4 – 17<br />

9 – 24<br />

2 – 14<br />

3 – 11<br />

6 – 18<br />

1 – 9<br />

1 – 8<br />

1 – 7<br />

2 – 14<br />

2 – 5<br />

1 – 8<br />

1 – 10<br />

6 – 28<br />

3 – 29<br />

6 – 23<br />

14 – 28<br />

2 – 20<br />

5 – 22<br />

11 – 25<br />

32<br />

34<br />

32<br />

42<br />

47<br />

27<br />

32


36<br />

Natura Montenegrina, 6/2007<br />

Table 4. Level of flowering (number of flowers on tree) of individual trees of Acer<br />

monspessulanum L. during a year<br />

Population<br />

Year<br />

Level of flowering<br />

N Non-flowering Very low Low Medium High Very high<br />

1998.<br />

20<br />

1<br />

3<br />

4<br />

2<br />

4<br />

6<br />

1999.<br />

20<br />

10<br />

2<br />

3<br />

1<br />

3<br />

1<br />

STUBICA<br />

2000.<br />

20<br />

11<br />

6<br />

3<br />

-<br />

-<br />

-<br />

2001.<br />

20<br />

-<br />

1<br />

1<br />

-<br />

5<br />

13<br />

2002.<br />

20<br />

18<br />

2<br />

-<br />

-<br />

-<br />

-<br />

2003.<br />

20<br />

2<br />

6<br />

1<br />

1<br />

2<br />

8<br />

2004.<br />

20<br />

-<br />

1<br />

1<br />

1<br />

8<br />

9<br />

1998.<br />

20<br />

4<br />

2<br />

3<br />

-<br />

5<br />

6<br />

1999.<br />

20<br />

3<br />

3<br />

2<br />

-<br />

7<br />

5<br />

2000.<br />

20<br />

7<br />

1<br />

-<br />

1<br />

4<br />

7<br />

GREBICE<br />

2001.<br />

20<br />

-<br />

-<br />

-<br />

-<br />

11<br />

9<br />

2002.<br />

20<br />

13<br />

4<br />

1<br />

-<br />

2<br />

-<br />

2003.<br />

20<br />

1<br />

8<br />

2<br />

9<br />

-<br />

-<br />

2004.<br />

20<br />

1<br />

4<br />

7<br />

8<br />

Total number of flowers on single inflorescences varied from 3 – 28 (0 – 12 of the<br />

female and 0 – 24 of the male flowers) (Table 5., 6.) . The inflorescences with only<br />

female flowers were very rare (it were found only 2 of such inflorescences), while<br />

inflorescences with only male flowers were very frequent on all trees. Quantitative<br />

relationship of the male and female flowers on the single tree was from 50 %: 50 % (1<br />

tree) to 99.9 % of the male flowers (6 trees) (Table 5., 6.).


37<br />

Tripić: CONTRIBUTION TO THE KNOWLEDGE OF THE FLOWERING PHENOLOGY . . .<br />

Table 5. Frequent of number of flowers in the individual inflorescences in Acer<br />

monspessulanum L. (Stubica)<br />

Tree<br />

Year<br />

Male flowers Female flowers All flowers in an<br />

inflorescence<br />

Min. Max. Frequently Min. Max. Frequently Min. Max. Frequently<br />

% of ♂<br />

flowers<br />

on tree<br />

1998. 3 16 7 , 8 0 6 1 , 2 5 16 11 , 9 81.0<br />

1 2001. 4 14 8 0 6 2 , 1 6 15 10 84.3<br />

2004. 5 14 7 , 6 0 9 1 , 0 5 18 10 80.0<br />

1998. 6 14 9 0 2 0 6 14 14 , 13 96.3<br />

2 1999. 6 16 9 , 8 0 5 0 , 1 6 16 9 , 10 93.3<br />

2001. 6 13 8 , 7 0 4 0 6 14 8 94.7<br />

2004. 5 14 9 , 8 1 6 0 , 2 6 18 10 , 12 88.9<br />

1998. 4 11 6 , 7 0 6 4 , 5 6 15 8 , 9 70.8<br />

3 2001. 4 13 9 , 12 0 5 4 , 5 5 17 14 , 15 79.6<br />

2004. 6 14 9 , 10 1 7 5 7 20 14 66.7<br />

4 2001. 4 11 7 , 8 0 9 3 , 2 6 18 10 , 11 71.7<br />

2004. 5 13 9 , 7 1 7 3 , 6 8 17 12 66.8<br />

5 2001. 4 13 8 , 6 1 5 1 , 3 6 16 7 , 9 85.1<br />

2004. 3 12 7 , 8 1 7 3 6 17 9 , 7 63.7<br />

6 2004. 4 10 7 1 7 4 6 17 8 , 12 60.2<br />

7 2001. 3 10 6 , 5 1 5 1 , 3 6 15 8 , 9 62.9<br />

2004. 2 7 5 1 6 1 , 5 5 13 7 , 6 63.8<br />

8 2001. 6 16 9 , 13 0 1 0 6 16 9 , 13 99.9<br />

2004. 7 18 12 , 10 0 1 0 7 18 12 , 10 99.99<br />

9 2001. 4 13 6 , 7 0 2 0 4 13 6 , 7 97.3<br />

2004. 4 13 6 0 5 0 5 15 6 92.5<br />

1998. 2 10 5 , 7 0 5 3 , 1 4 14 6 , 9 69.1<br />

10 2001. 3 10 6 , 4 0 6 3 5 13 9 , 7 65.8<br />

2004. 3 10 7 , 6 1 6 4 , 5 6 15 9 , 11 64.1<br />

1998. 5 17 11 , 10 0 2 0 5 17 11 , 10 99.9<br />

11 1999. 6 14 10 , 11 0 4 0 6 14 11 , 10 99.9<br />

2001. 5 14 7 0 3 0 5 14 7 99.99<br />

2004. 5 17 13 , 9 0 3 0 5 17 13 , 9 99.99<br />

1999. 4 15 8 , 11 0 3 0 4 15 8 , 11 99.9<br />

12 2001. 5 14 7 , 6 0 5 0 5 15 7 99.2<br />

2004. 5 21 8 , 11 0 5 0 5 21 8 , 11 99.7<br />

1998. 3 16 9 0 7 5 , 4 8 22 14 , 12 67.6<br />

13 2001. 2 17 9 1 7 5 , 4 7 23 15 , 7 63.8<br />

2004. 6 16 8 , 14 1 7 4 , 6 11 21 14 , 16 72.9<br />

14 2001. 5 14 7 0 2 0 6 14 7 , 8 94.0<br />

1998. 2 8 5 , 3 1 5 2 , 4 4 13 7 , 8 60.4<br />

15 1999. 2 7 3 1 7 1 , 2 4 10 5 , 6 54.6<br />

2001. 2 8 4 , 5 1 5 3 5 12 7 , 8 58.7<br />

2004. 4 10 6 , 7 1 7 5 , 7 5 16 14 58.4<br />

16 2001. 5 15 8 , 9 0 3 0 5 16 8 , 9 90.0<br />

2004. 6 18 10 , 11 0 5 0 7 18 10 , 14 99.3<br />

1998. 3 11 7 0 2 0 4 12 8 99.9<br />

17 2001. 3 12 7 0 3 0 5 13 7 , 8 99.5<br />

2004. 4 15 7 , 10 0 2 0 4 15 7 , 10 99.4<br />

18 2001. 4 12 6 1 5 3 5 14 7 , 10 63.3<br />

2004. 5 14 8 , 9 0 7 5 , 1 8 19 11 , 15 69.2<br />

19 2001. 3 20 5 , 6 0 3 0 4 22 6 , 5 99.99<br />

2004. 6 14 8 , 10 0 4 0 6 14 8 , 10 99.99<br />

1998. 0 14 7 0 5 3 , 2 4 17 9 , 8 69.7<br />

20 2001. 1 10 3 , 4 1 5 5 , 4 5 14 8 , 7 49.4<br />

2004. 4 12 8 1 7 5 , 3 6 18 13 , 12 58.7


38<br />

Natura Montenegrina, 6/2007<br />

Tab. 6. Frequent of number of flowers in the individual inflorescences in Acer<br />

monspessulanum L. (Grebice)<br />

Tree Year<br />

Male flowers Female flowers Total of number flowers<br />

in inflorescences<br />

% of ♂<br />

flowers<br />

Min. Max. Frequently Min. Max. Frequently Min. Max. Frequently on tree<br />

1999. 4 13 5 and 7 1 7 5 and 3 6 18 11 and 12 66.0<br />

1 2000. 2 15 8 and 9 1 7 3 and 5 5 19 11 and 13 72.4<br />

2001. 3 22 8 and 7 0 7 5 and 3 5 28 12 and 13 69.5<br />

2002. 5 17 8 and 10 0 5 1 and 2 6 19 11 and 10 81.7<br />

2004. 4 15 6 and 11 0 7 5 and 1 5 20 15 70.3<br />

1999. 4 11 7 and 6 1 5 1 and 3 6 14 10 and 7 74.5<br />

2 2001. 4 12 7 0 5 3 5 16 10 75.0<br />

2004. 4 11 6 0 5 2 and 3 7 15 9 69.0<br />

2000. 4 15 9 and 10 1 7 5 and 4 7 18 14 and 12 68.1<br />

3 2001. 3 10 6 and 7 1 6 1 and 4 5 15 9 69.9<br />

2004. 6 15 8 and 12 1 6 2 and 1 7 21 15 and 10 77.7<br />

4 2001. 5 13 6 and 5 0 2 0 5 13 6 and 5 99.99<br />

2004. 6 16 9 and 7 0 1 0 6 16 9 and 7 99.99<br />

2004. 3 8 6 1 5 2 6 14 9 68.5<br />

5 2001. 2 10 4 and 5 1 5 4 and 5 5 14 6 and 8 58.6<br />

2004. 4 10 6 1 5 5 and 3 7 14 11 64.9<br />

1999. 4 12 7 1 6 5 6 17 11 66.0<br />

6 2001. 5 12 7 1 6 3 and 4 7 16 11 and 14 69.0<br />

2004. 4 12 7 and 8 0 5 2 and 0 5 15 8 and 12 77.6<br />

1999. 6 13 8 and 9 0 9 4 and 2 7 19 14 and 12 59.2<br />

7 2001. 6 10 8 and 9 1 8 2 and 5 8 17 13 and 11 68.9<br />

2004. 5 10 7 and 9 0 12 3 and 4 5 20 10 and 13 60.9<br />

2000. 8 22 11 1 5 2 and 4 10 25 13 and 17 81.6<br />

8 2001. 8 20 15 0 7 1 and 4 9 23 18 85.2<br />

2004. 7 24 16 0 6 1 and 3 8 25 18 85.9<br />

1999. 4 16 8 and 10 1 6 1 and 3 5 17 9 78.7<br />

9 2000. 5 13 8 and 9 1 5 2 and 3 7 17 12 and 14 75.6<br />

2001. 3 12 7 and 9 1 5 3 6 16 10 and 11 73.1<br />

10 2001. 6 19 8 0 3 0 8 19 8 and 11 91.1<br />

2004. 7 21 12 0 3 0 7 22 13 and 14 92.7<br />

11 2001. 4 11 7 0 3 0 4 11 7 99.5<br />

2004. 5 11 7 and 8 0 1 0 5 11 7 and 8 99.99<br />

12 2001. 4 14 9 and 6 1 6 4 and 3 7 18 12 and 10 72.0<br />

2004. 5 16 11 1 7 4 and 5 7 21 14 69.9<br />

13 2000. 3 13 7 and 6 1 6 3 and 5 6 18 10 and 12 66.8<br />

2004. 4 12 6 and 8 1 7 1 and 5 5 17 7 and 12 66.3<br />

14 2001. 3 11 6 and 5 0 3 0 3 11 5 and 7 94.1<br />

2004. 5 10 7 0 4 0 and 1 5 13 5 and 8 87.3<br />

2001. 5 17 10 0 6 1 and 2 6 19 13 and 11 78.6<br />

15 2004. 6 20 11 and 7 0 7 1 7 21 13 85.9<br />

1999. 5 13 6 and 8 1 4 1 and 2 6 14 7 and 9 83.7<br />

16 2000. 3 17 12 and 9 1 7 3 and 6 6 20 12 and 16 68.7<br />

2004. 5 21 6 and 14 1 7 1 and 2 6 22 7 and 16 87.8<br />

17 2001. 7 17 12 and 9 0 6 0 and 4 7 17 12 84.7<br />

2004. 7 16 10 0 5 2 and 0 11 18 12 and 14 82.4<br />

1999. 0 15 7 and 10 0 8 0 and 5 6 16 10 and 11 92.4<br />

18 2001. 7 16 11 and 9 0 7 0 and 1 8 17 92.6<br />

2004. 6 18 9 and 11 0 7 1 and 2 7 18 16 and 11 82.8<br />

19<br />

2001. 4 11 6 and 7 1 5 1 and 3 5 15 7 and 10 74.4<br />

2004. 5 12 7 and 11 0 5 1 and 0 7 16 8 and 7 89.0<br />

20 1999. 4 11 7 and 9 0 6 0 and 1 6 16 10 and 8 81.4<br />

2000. 5 12 6 and 8 0 5 0 and 2 6 17 8 and 13 85.6


39<br />

Graph. 1. The phenophases: swelling of buds, opening of buds and flowering of the individual<br />

trees of Acer monspessulanum L. (Stubica)<br />

Year<br />

1998<br />

1999<br />

2000<br />

Tree February March April May<br />

10. 15. 20. 25. 5. 10. 15. 20. 25. 5. 10. 15. 20. 25. 5. 10.<br />

o C 2.3 8.0 7.8 5.5 2.1 3.0 11.0 7.2 11.2 13.3<br />

1<br />

2<br />

3<br />

4<br />

5<br />

6<br />

7<br />

8<br />

9<br />

10<br />

11<br />

12<br />

13<br />

14<br />

15<br />

16<br />

17<br />

18<br />

19<br />

20<br />

o C 0.4 -1.3 2.2 5.6 5.7 6.5 9.7 8.2 10.9 14.9<br />

1<br />

2<br />

3<br />

4<br />

5<br />

6<br />

7<br />

8<br />

9<br />

10<br />

11<br />

12<br />

13<br />

14<br />

15<br />

16<br />

17<br />

18<br />

19<br />

20<br />

o C 3.1 2.5 0.8 3.6 3.4 7.2 7.3 13.3 14.9 14.5<br />

1<br />

2<br />

3<br />

4<br />

5<br />

6


40<br />

Graph. 1.<br />

Year<br />

2000<br />

2001<br />

2002<br />

Tree February March April May<br />

10. 15. 20. 25. 5. 10. 15. 20. 25. 5. 10. 15. 20. 25. 5. 10.<br />

o C 3.1 2.5 0.8 3.6 3.4 7.2 7.3 13.3 14.9 14.5<br />

7<br />

8<br />

9<br />

10<br />

11<br />

12<br />

13<br />

14<br />

15<br />

16<br />

17<br />

18<br />

19<br />

20<br />

o C 3.7 4.7 2.8 6.2 9.3 10.2 8.4 6.4 11.9 14.7<br />

1<br />

2<br />

3<br />

4<br />

5<br />

6<br />

7<br />

8<br />

9<br />

10<br />

11<br />

12<br />

13<br />

14<br />

15<br />

16<br />

17<br />

18<br />

19<br />

20<br />

o C 5.6 6.0 4.6 9.8 8.9 5.9 7.7 10.8 12.3 14.6<br />

1<br />

2<br />

3<br />

4<br />

5<br />

6<br />

7<br />

8<br />

9<br />

10<br />

11<br />

12<br />

13<br />

14<br />

15<br />

16


41<br />

Year<br />

2002<br />

2003<br />

Graph . 1.<br />

Tree February March April May<br />

10. 15. 20. 25. 5. 10. 15. 20. 25. 5. 10. 15. 20. 25. 5. 10.<br />

o C 5.6 6.0 4.6 9.8 8.9 5.9 7.7 10.8 12.3 14.6<br />

17<br />

18<br />

19<br />

20<br />

o C -2.0 -20 0.9 4.8 4.3 6.9 4.4 11.1 10.9 19.9<br />

1<br />

2<br />

3<br />

4<br />

5<br />

6<br />

7<br />

8<br />

9<br />

10<br />

11<br />

12<br />

13<br />

14<br />

15<br />

16<br />

17<br />

18<br />

19<br />

1<br />

2<br />

3<br />

4<br />

5<br />

6<br />

7<br />

8<br />

9<br />

2004<br />

10<br />

11<br />

12<br />

13<br />

14<br />

15<br />

16<br />

17<br />

18<br />

19<br />

20<br />

Legend:<br />

20<br />

o C -3.4 0.5 0.8 0.4 8.5 7.5 10.5 9.7 10.6 10.8<br />

- phenophase of the swelling of the buds;<br />

- phenophase of the opening of the buds;<br />

- phenophase of the flowering


42<br />

Graph. 2. The phenophase of the flowering of the observed individual trees of Acer<br />

monspessulanum L. (Stubica)<br />

Year<br />

1998.<br />

1999.<br />

2000.<br />

Tree<br />

March April May<br />

5. 10. 15. 20. 25. 5. 10. 15. 20. 25. 5. 10.<br />

o C 5.5 2.1 3.0 11.0 7.2 11.2 13.3<br />

1<br />

2<br />

3<br />

4<br />

5<br />

6<br />

7<br />

8<br />

9<br />

10<br />

11<br />

12 Non flowered<br />

13<br />

14<br />

15<br />

16<br />

17<br />

18<br />

19<br />

20<br />

o C 5.6 5.7 6.5 9.7 8.2 10.9 14.9<br />

1<br />

2<br />

3<br />

4 Non flowered<br />

5 Non flowered<br />

6 Non flowered<br />

7 Non flowered<br />

8 Non flowered<br />

9 Non flowered<br />

10 Non flowered<br />

11<br />

12<br />

13<br />

14 Non flowered<br />

15<br />

16 Non flowered<br />

17<br />

18<br />

19<br />

20 Non flowered<br />

o C 3.6 3.4 7.2 7.3 13.3 14.9 14.5<br />

1<br />

2<br />

3<br />

4 4 – 7 Non flowered


43<br />

Graph. 2.<br />

Year<br />

2000.<br />

2001.<br />

2002.<br />

Tree<br />

March April May<br />

5. 10. 15. 20. 25. 5. 10. 15. 20. 25. 5. 10.<br />

o C 3.6 3.4 7.2 7.3 13.3 14.9 14.5<br />

8<br />

9<br />

10 Non flowered<br />

11 Non flowered<br />

12<br />

13<br />

14 Non flowered<br />

15<br />

16 Non flowered<br />

17<br />

18<br />

19 Non flowered<br />

20 Non flowered<br />

o C 6.2 9.3 10.2 8.4 6.4 11.9 14.7<br />

1<br />

2<br />

3<br />

4<br />

5<br />

6<br />

7<br />

8<br />

9<br />

10<br />

11<br />

12<br />

13<br />

14<br />

15<br />

16<br />

17<br />

18<br />

19<br />

20<br />

o C 9.8 8.9 5.9 7.7 10.8 12.3 14.6<br />

1 Non flowered<br />

2 Non flowered<br />

3 Non flowered<br />

4 Non flowered<br />

5 Non flowered<br />

6 Non flowered<br />

7 Non flowered<br />

8 Non flowered<br />

9 Non flowered<br />

10 Non flowered<br />

11 Non flowered<br />

12 Non flowered<br />

13 Non flowered<br />

14


44<br />

Year<br />

2002.<br />

2003.<br />

2004.<br />

1<br />

2<br />

3<br />

4<br />

5<br />

6<br />

7<br />

8<br />

9<br />

10<br />

11<br />

12<br />

13<br />

14<br />

15<br />

16<br />

17<br />

18<br />

19<br />

20<br />

Legend:<br />

Graph. 2.<br />

Tree<br />

March April May<br />

5. 10. 15. 20. 25. 5. 10. 15. 20. 25. 5. 10.<br />

o C 9.8 8.9 5.9 7.7 10.8 12.3 14.6<br />

15<br />

16 16 – 20 Non flowered<br />

o C 4.8 4.3 6.9 4.4 11.1 10.9 19.9<br />

1<br />

2<br />

3<br />

4<br />

5<br />

6 Non flowered<br />

7<br />

8<br />

9<br />

10<br />

11<br />

12<br />

13<br />

14 Non flowered<br />

15<br />

16<br />

17<br />

18<br />

19<br />

20<br />

o C 0.4 8.5 7.5 10.5 9.7 12.6 10.8<br />

- phenophase of the flowering of the male flowers<br />

- phenophase of the flowering of the female flowers


45<br />

Graph. 3. The phenophases: swelling of buds, opening of buds and flowering of the<br />

individual trees of Acer monspessulanum L. (Grebice)<br />

Year<br />

1998<br />

1999<br />

2000<br />

Tree February March April May<br />

10. 15. 20. 25. 5. 10. 15. 20. 25. 5. 10. 15. 20. 25. 5. 10.<br />

o C 2.3 8.0 7.8 5.5 2.1 3.0 11.0 7.2 11.2 13.3<br />

1<br />

2<br />

3<br />

4<br />

5<br />

6<br />

7<br />

8<br />

9<br />

10<br />

11<br />

12<br />

13<br />

14<br />

15<br />

16<br />

17<br />

18<br />

19<br />

20<br />

o C 0.4 -1.3 2.2 5.6 5.7 6.5 9.7 8.2 10.9 14.9<br />

1<br />

2<br />

3<br />

4<br />

5<br />

6<br />

7<br />

8<br />

9<br />

10<br />

11<br />

12<br />

13<br />

14<br />

15<br />

16<br />

17<br />

18<br />

19<br />

20<br />

o C 3.1 2.5 0.8 3.6 3.4 7.2 7.3 13.3 14.9 14.5<br />

1<br />

2<br />

3<br />

4<br />

5<br />

6<br />

7<br />

8<br />

9


46<br />

Graph. 3.<br />

Year<br />

2000<br />

2001<br />

2002<br />

Tree February March April May<br />

10. 15. 20. 25. 5. 10. 15. 20. 25. 5. 10. 15. 20. 25. 5. 10.<br />

o C 3.1 2.5 0.8 3.6 3.4 7.2 7.3 13.3 14.9 14.5<br />

10<br />

11<br />

12<br />

13<br />

14<br />

15<br />

16<br />

17<br />

18<br />

19<br />

20<br />

o C 3.7 4.7 2.8 6.2 9.3 10.2 8.4 6.4 11.9 14.7<br />

1<br />

2<br />

3<br />

4<br />

5<br />

6<br />

7<br />

8<br />

9<br />

10<br />

11<br />

12<br />

13<br />

14<br />

15<br />

16<br />

17<br />

18<br />

19<br />

20<br />

o C 5.6 6.0 4.6 9.8 8.9 5.9 7.7 10.8 12.3 14.6<br />

1<br />

2<br />

3<br />

4<br />

5<br />

6<br />

7<br />

8<br />

9<br />

10<br />

11<br />

12<br />

13<br />

14<br />

15<br />

16<br />

17<br />

18<br />

19<br />

20


47<br />

Year<br />

2003<br />

Graph. 3.<br />

Tree February March April May<br />

10. 15. 20. 25. 5. 10. 15. 20. 25. 5. 10. 15. 20. 25. 5. 10.<br />

o C -2.0 -20 0.9 4.8 4.3 6.9 4.4 11.1 10.9 19.9<br />

1<br />

2<br />

3<br />

4<br />

5<br />

6<br />

7<br />

5<br />

9<br />

10<br />

11<br />

12<br />

13<br />

14<br />

15<br />

16<br />

17<br />

18<br />

19<br />

1<br />

2<br />

3<br />

4<br />

5<br />

6<br />

7<br />

2004 8<br />

9<br />

10<br />

11<br />

12<br />

13<br />

14<br />

15<br />

16<br />

17<br />

18<br />

19<br />

20<br />

Legend:<br />

20<br />

o C -3.4 0.5 0.8 0.4 8.5 7.5 10.5 9.7 12.6 10.8<br />

- phenophase of the swelling of the buds;<br />

- phenophase of the opening of the buds;<br />

- phenophase of the flowering


48<br />

Graph. 4. The phenophase of the flowering of the observed individual trees of Acer<br />

monspessulanum L. (Grebice)<br />

Year<br />

1998<br />

1999<br />

2000<br />

Tree<br />

March April May<br />

5. 10. 15. 20. 25. 5. 10. 15. 20. 25. 5. 10. 15. 20.<br />

o C 5.5 2.1 3.0 11.1 7.2 11.2 13.3 14.4<br />

1<br />

2<br />

3<br />

4<br />

5<br />

6<br />

7<br />

8<br />

9<br />

10<br />

11 Non flowered<br />

12<br />

13<br />

14 Non flowered<br />

15 Non flowered<br />

16<br />

17 Non flowered<br />

18<br />

19<br />

20<br />

o C 5.6 5.7 6.5 9.7 8.2 10.9 14.9 15.8<br />

1<br />

2<br />

3<br />

4<br />

5<br />

6<br />

7<br />

8<br />

9<br />

10<br />

11<br />

12<br />

13<br />

14 Non flowered<br />

15 Non flowered<br />

16<br />

17 Non flowered<br />

18<br />

19<br />

20<br />

o C 3.6 3.4 7.2 7.3 13.3 14.9 14.5 17.1<br />

1<br />

2<br />

3<br />

4 Non flowered<br />

5 Non flowered<br />

6<br />

7<br />

8<br />

9


49<br />

Graph. 4<br />

Year<br />

2000<br />

2001<br />

2002<br />

Tree<br />

March April May<br />

5. 10. 15. 20. 25. 5. 10. 15. 20. 25. 5. 10. 15. 20.<br />

o C 3.6 3.4 7.2 7.3 13.3 14.9 14.5 17.1<br />

10<br />

11 Non flowered<br />

12 Non flowered<br />

13<br />

14 Non flowered<br />

15<br />

16<br />

17 Non flowered<br />

18<br />

19 Non flowered<br />

20<br />

o C 6.2 9.3 10.2 8.4 6.4 11.9 14.7 14.4<br />

1<br />

2<br />

3<br />

4<br />

5<br />

6<br />

7<br />

8<br />

9<br />

10<br />

11<br />

12<br />

13<br />

14<br />

15<br />

16<br />

17<br />

18<br />

19<br />

20<br />

o C 9.8 8.9 5.9 7.7 10.8 12.3 14.6 15.8<br />

1<br />

2 Non flowered<br />

3<br />

4 Non flowered<br />

5 Non flowered<br />

6<br />

7 Non flowered<br />

8<br />

9<br />

10 Non flowered<br />

11 Non flowered<br />

12 Non flowered<br />

13 Non flowered<br />

14 Non flowered<br />

15 Non flowered<br />

16<br />

17 Non flowered<br />

18 Non flowered<br />

19 Non flowered<br />

20


50<br />

Year<br />

2003<br />

Graph. 4.<br />

Tree<br />

March April May<br />

5. 10. 15. 20. 25. 5. 10. 15. 20. 25. 5. 10. 15. 20.<br />

o C 4.8 4.3 6.9 4.4 11.1 10.9 19.9 17.8<br />

1<br />

2<br />

3<br />

4<br />

5<br />

6<br />

7<br />

8<br />

9<br />

10<br />

11<br />

12<br />

13<br />

14<br />

15<br />

16<br />

17<br />

18<br />

19<br />

1<br />

2<br />

3<br />

4<br />

5<br />

6<br />

7<br />

8<br />

9<br />

2004<br />

10<br />

11<br />

12<br />

13<br />

14<br />

15<br />

16<br />

17<br />

18<br />

19<br />

20<br />

Legend:<br />

20 Non flowered<br />

o C 0.4 8.5 7.5 10.5 9.7 10.6 12.6 12.3<br />

- phenophase of the flowering of the male flowers<br />

- phenophase of the flowering of the female flowers


51<br />

Tripić: CONTRIBUTION TO THE KNOWLEDGE OF THE FLOWERING PHENOLOGY . . .<br />

According to G u d e s k i & D r e n k o v s k i (1978) relationship between female<br />

and male flowers in individual trees of A. monspessulanum during a year there are only<br />

or almost female flowers or only or almost male flowers, however, in the next year the<br />

situation was contrary or a proximally equal. Our investigation shown different results –<br />

in each year (in seven years of observing) relationship between female and male<br />

flowers of individual trees was similar (Tab. 5. and 6.).<br />

The flowering of the single tree lasted from 2 – 29 days and of the entire<br />

population from 23 – 59 days (the most frequent 30 – 34 days) depending of the<br />

weather conditions, especially temperature, but also, from number of flowered trees,<br />

richness of flowered trees and numeral relationship of male and female flowers on the<br />

tree (Graph. 2., 4.). Phenophases of flowering of male and female flowers on the same<br />

trees were totally separated in time with 1/2 to 7 days of pause between them. During<br />

phenophases of flowering on individual trees, series of male flowers are shown followed<br />

with series of female flowers (protandrous trees) or when there are series of female<br />

flowers they are followed with series of male flowers (protogynous trees). Very rarely<br />

(in case of very good flowering) on same trees another serie of male flowers (♂ - ♀ -<br />

♂) is shown and also very rerely there is (only with one tree during one year) other<br />

serie of female flowers (♀ - ♂ - ♀ - ♂) during period of flowering.<br />

T r i p i ć (2006) presents very similar results for A. obtusatum but for A.<br />

campestre and A. platanoides he presents results that claim that all trees protandrous<br />

trees always had two series of male flowers (♂ - ♀ - ♂) and all protogynous trees<br />

always had only one serie male flowers and one serie female flowers (♀ - ♂).<br />

Protogyny is found on 8 (40 %) trees in population STUBICA and 11 (55 %) trees<br />

in population GREBICE, and protandry is found on 12 (60 %) trees in population<br />

STUBICA and 9 (45 %) trees in population GREBICE (Graph. 2., 4.). The same trees<br />

always had protandry or protogyny during all years of observation. These are flowering<br />

types of inflorescences that found: A type (♀) – very rare, B type (♀ - ♂) – frequent, D<br />

type (♂ - ♀) – frequent, E type (♂) – frequent.<br />

CONCLUSION<br />

The flowers were morphologically false bisexually and functionally unisexual. The<br />

male flowers had very small (rudimentary) pistil and well-developed stamens (long<br />

filaments and yellow functional anthers), and the female flowers had well-developed<br />

pistil and unripe stamens (green, hard and non-functional anthers on very short<br />

filaments). Protogyny is found on 8 (40 %) trees in population STUBICA and 11 (55 %)<br />

trees in population GREBICE, and protandry is found on 12 (60 %) trees in population<br />

STUBICA and 9 (45 %) trees in population GREBICE (Graph. 2., 4.). With 19 of<br />

observed trees, during every year of observing, protogyny is established, while 21 trees


52<br />

Natura Montenegrina, 6/2007<br />

always had protandry. Total number of the flowers in individual inflorescence varies<br />

from 3 - 28 (male flowers 0 - 24 and female flowers 0 - 12). Quantitative relationship of<br />

the male and female flowers on single trees is 49.46 % - 99.99 % of the male flowers.<br />

The flowering types of inflorescence that were found: A type (♀) – very rare, B<br />

type (♀ - ♂) – frequent, D type (♂ - ♀) – frequent, E (♂)– frequent.<br />

LITERATURE<br />

B E J D E M A N, I. N. 1974: Metodika izučenija fenologiji rastenij i rastitel'nyh<br />

soobšćestv. ANSSSR, Sibirskoe otdelenije, Limnologičeskij Institut, 1-155 pp.<br />

Č A J L A H J A N, M. H. 1988: Reguljacija cvetenija vysših rastenij. AN SSSR,<br />

''Nauka'', Moskva, 3-559 pp.<br />

C H A I L A K H Y A N, M. KH., K H R I A N I N, V. N. 1982: Sex of plants and its<br />

hormonal regulation. AN SSSR, ''Nauka'', Moskva.<br />

G U D E S K I, A. & D R E N K O V S K I, R. 1978: Morfologija i pol na cvetovite kaj<br />

nekoi vidovi od rodot Acer L. Godišen zbornik na Šumarskiot fakultet na<br />

Univerzitet vo Skopje, knj. 28: 6-24 (1977/78), Skopje.<br />

J O N G, P. C. De 1976: Flowering and sex expression in Acer L. Mededelingen,<br />

Landbouwhogeschool, Wageningen, Nederland, 76-2.<br />

P A L A M A R E V, E. 1979: Acer L. In: Flora na Narodna Republika B’lgarija, VII: 221<br />

– 240, Izdatelstvo na B’lgarskata Akademija na naukite, Sofija,<br />

P A X, F. 1885: Monographie der Gattung Acer L. Engler's botanischen Jahrbüchern,<br />

Band VII, Heft 2: 177- 263, Leipzig.<br />

P A X, F. 1902: Aceraceae. In: A. Engler, Das Pflanzenreich IV, 163, 8: 1-89, Leipzig.<br />

P O J A R K O V A, A. I. 1933: Botaniko-geografičeskij obzor klenov SSSR v svjazi s<br />

istoriej vsego roda Acer L. Trudy Botaničeskogo instituta AN SSSR, Ser. I: 225-<br />

374, Izdatel'stvo AN SSSR, Leningrad.<br />

T R I P I Ć, R. 2006: Flowering phenology and sex expression in Acer obtusatum<br />

Waldst. & Kit. from Montenegro. Natura Montenegrina N o 5: 15-24, Natural History<br />

Museum of Montenegro, Podgorica.<br />

T R I P I Ć, R. 2006: Flowering phenology and sex expression in Acer campestre L.<br />

from Montenegro. Natura Montenegrina N o 5: 25-36, Natural History Museum of<br />

Montenegro, Podgorica.<br />

T R I P I Ć, R. 2006: Contribution to the knowledge of flowering phenology and sex<br />

expression in Acer platanoides L. from Montenegro. (In press).<br />

Z A M J A T N I N, B. N. 1958: Acer L. In: Derev’ja i kustarniki SSSR, IV: 405 – 499,<br />

Izdatel’stvo Akademii nauk SSSR, Moskva – Leningrad.<br />

Received: 25. 12. 2007.


NATURA MONTENEGRINA, PODGORICA, 6:53-61<br />

THE FLORA AND VEGETATION OF SALT WORKS IN ULCINJ<br />

Snežana V U K S A N O V I Ć 1 & Danka PETROVIĆ 2<br />

1 Natural History Museum of Montenegro, Trg vojvode Bećir bega Osmanagića 7, Podgorica; Montenegro,<br />

E-mail: pr<strong>muzej</strong>@cg.yu; vukss@cg.yu<br />

2 The University of Montenegro Faculty of science, Department of Biology, Cetinjski put b.b., Podgorica;<br />

Montenegro, E-mail: danka.petrovic@cg.yu<br />

Кеy words:<br />

Ulcinj Salts,<br />

taxon,<br />

flora,<br />

vegetation types,<br />

species,<br />

habitats<br />

Ključne riječi:<br />

Ulcinjska Solana,<br />

takson,<br />

vegetacijski tipovi,<br />

vrste,<br />

stanista (habitati)<br />

SYNOPSIS<br />

The results two years’ research of flora and vegetation<br />

of Ulcinj Salts have been presented in this paper. A rare<br />

taxon Beta vulgaris ssp. maritima noted until now in flora of<br />

Montenegro only at one locality, was found. The paper<br />

consists of a review of vegetation types present in the Salt<br />

Works with a list of species which form them. A table with<br />

names of species and habitats they inhabit has also been<br />

presented.<br />

SINOPSIS<br />

FLORA I VEGETACIJA ULCINJSKE SOLANE<br />

U radu su predstavljeni rezultati istraživanja flore i<br />

vegetacije ulcinjske Solane tokom dvije godine. Pronađen je<br />

rijetki takson Beta vulgaris ssp. maritima koji se u flori <strong>Crne</strong><br />

<strong>Gore</strong> bilježi još na samo jednom lokalitetu. U radu je dat<br />

pregled tipova vegetacije prisutnih na prostoru Solane uz<br />

spisak vrsta koje ih izgrađuju. Na kraju je predstavljena<br />

tabela sa imenima vrsta i habitata koje naseljavaju.<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

The Ulcinj Salt Works are located in the far south of Montenegro. Built in the<br />

region with the biggest number of sunny days, the greatest insolation and the biggest<br />

number of tropical days in the former SFRY (M i c e v et all, 1995), they occupy around<br />

15 km 2 of salt pools. In the past, at the area of today’s salt pans there was Zoganjsko<br />

blato (mud), swamp with brackish water, which started assuming anthropogenic<br />

infrastructural form by end thirties of the century before last (H a d ž i b r a h i m o v i ć ,


54<br />

Natura Montenegrina, 6/2007<br />

2002). Today, these are artificial, men-directed ecosystems, where the time for filling<br />

the pools with the sea water, the level of water therein and water salinity are set in<br />

advance. The immediate vicinity of the sea, the Bojana River, Šasko Lake, Velipolje in<br />

Albania, and of the Lake of Skadar, makes this “Cultural Laguna”, as V a s i ć called it<br />

(1989), very interesting for ornithology and the science in general.<br />

MATERIAL AND METHODS<br />

The investigations of flora and vegetation of Salt Works, presented in this<br />

paper, were carried out in 2003 and 2004. During the first year, only one field visit<br />

was made (June), while in 2004 field visits were taking place during the entire<br />

vegetation season (March-October). The material collected on the filed was<br />

subsequently determined, put into herbaria and deposited with the Natural History<br />

Museum of Montenegro. The borders of vegetation entities were recorded and the<br />

alteration thereof depending on the time of year and the water level in the basins was<br />

monitored. The paper includes an overview of the types of vegetation present in the<br />

area of Salt Pans along with a list of species that make up these types of vegetation.<br />

HALOPHYLOUS VEGETATION<br />

Grounds with a large quantity of salt are unfavourable for plant life, and thus<br />

they are inhabited only with the species that are specifically adapted to cruel living<br />

conditions in these habitats. Such plants, known as halophytes, form floristically poor,<br />

but very interesting plant cover. Typical or genuine halophytes or euhalophytes can be<br />

found in the habitats with high salinity degree and significant moistness. Their<br />

communities present a predominant type of vegetation in the Salt Works. They were<br />

found on the muddy-clayish boundary places of the pools, Lake I, Lake II, canals, as<br />

well as on the embankments. They partially have an emerged character, i.e. they<br />

inhabit shallow waters. The zonation of halophytic vegetation in the Salt Works is inter<br />

alia determined by the composition of canals and embankments.<br />

The association of Salicornietum herbaceae Jank. & Stev., is developed on<br />

very salty and constantly flooded sites, and some associations are located in shallow<br />

waters. The species Salicornia herbacea L. is predominating species of this<br />

community. In addition to this taxon, the association is dominated by Sueda maritima<br />

Dum, while less numerous are the species Limonium angustifolium (Tausch) Degen<br />

and Atriplex portulacoides L. As accompanying species there appear Salsola soda L.<br />

and Atriplex prostrata Boucher ex DC. The community emerges in the month of May,<br />

and right before the end of summer and in autumn, when Salicornia blossoms and<br />

gets a characteristic red colour, the community reaches the peak of its development.<br />

The community of Arthrocnemetum fruticosi Br. – Bl., which appears on the salt<br />

grounds very often in combination with the community of Salicornietum herbaceae<br />

Jank. & Stev., is present only in fragments on the Salt Works. It develops at


55<br />

Vuksanović & Petrović: THE FLORA AND VEGETATION OF SALT WORKS IN ULCINJ<br />

somewhat distant, always flooded and very salty places. It is of the same floristic<br />

composition, but there is a difference in the level of presence of certain species.<br />

These two communities are at some places mosaically combined. In the dry and less<br />

salty areas the characteristic species in the community is Limonium angustifolium<br />

(Tausch) Degen.<br />

The best developed species of euhalophyta are located in the beginning zone<br />

of the lake I (in the vicinity of blue houses). These are real meadows on which one<br />

can notice two zones of halophytic vegetation. The first one, developed along the<br />

water, is made up of the community of Salicornietum herbaceae Jank. & Stev .<br />

Going toward the dams and canal, the second, more complexly built halophytic zone,<br />

appears. It is formed by constituents of diverse floristic composition, which alternate<br />

mosaically among each other. These are: pure constituents of the species Limonium<br />

angustifolium (Tausch) Degen; constituents wherein along with Limonium<br />

angustifolium (Tausch) Degen appear: Atriplex portulacoides L., Sueda maritime Dum.<br />

and Carex sp.; the dominant species Sueda maritima Dum. and Carex sp; constituents<br />

wherein Sueda maritime Dum. and Limonium angustifolium (Tausch) Degen appear<br />

along Carex sp.,; pure constituens of Carex sp. As accompanying species there<br />

appear: Spergularia salina Presl, Plantago coronopus L. and Coronopus squamatus<br />

(Forsskal) Asch.<br />

In the remaining parts of the Salt Works (Lake II, First Evaporation, pools of<br />

Zoganj, Second Evaporation, dams) there are also two halophytic zones wherein the<br />

euhalophytic vegetation is dispersed in the same way, although it is less developed. In<br />

the crystallisation basins and along the margins of the canal we find individual<br />

specimens, which do not form communities.<br />

Going further from the water, the terrain rises (soil becomes deeper), salinity<br />

and humidity of the ground decrease. In this area the dominant species become those<br />

which appear in the second zone of the halophytic vegetation as accompanying<br />

species (Spergularia salina Presl., Plantago coronopus L. i Coronopus squamatus<br />

(Forsskal) Asch). This type of vegetation is best developed during April and in the<br />

beginning of May, when dominant species blossom. By the passing of the vegetation<br />

season, there start to emerge the elements of meadow and ruderal vegetation which<br />

become the dominant ones.<br />

On the dams, which divide the basins, the species Inula crithmoides L., an<br />

important element of halophytic vegetation, appears.<br />

MEADOW VEGETATION<br />

The communities of meadow flora spread in deeper layers of the ground with<br />

less salinity. Meadow type of vegetation exists on the raised land along the channel<br />

leading to Lake I. On the meadow, different aspects change each other during the<br />

vegetation season. During March geophyte are predominant, such as: Narcissus<br />

tazetta L., <strong>Rom</strong>ulea bulbocodium (L.) Sebast. & Mauri, Hyacinthus orientalis L. and<br />

Ornithogalum sp. Later, the following species dominate in the meadow: Avena barbata


56<br />

Natura Montenegrina, 6/2007<br />

Pott ex Link, Dactylis glomerata L., Phragmites comunis Trin., Carex sp., and during<br />

the autumn Limonium angustifolium L. is also present. The facies with dominant<br />

species Trifolium nigricens Viv. exists only in fragments. Accompanying elements of<br />

such communities are Anemone hortensis L., Anagalis arvensis L., Bellis perennis L.,<br />

Bituminaria bituminosa (L.) Stirton, Echium vulgare L., Silene gallica L. etc.<br />

In the central part of meadow situated between First evaporation and pools of<br />

Zoganj, typical meadow vegetation is developed during the spring, with dominating<br />

species: Petrorhagia saxifraga (L.) Link, Petrorhagia prolifera (L.) P.W.Ball &<br />

Haywood, Moenchia mantica (L.) Bartl., Kickxia commutata (Bernh. ex Reichenb.)<br />

Fritsch etc. But, in autumn, at the same space, predominant species is Limonium<br />

angustifolium (Tausch) Degen. The community with distinctive taxon Juncus acutus L.<br />

cover the rest of meadow. Like the first-mentioned meadow the same geophyte are<br />

developed in March, and here are noted the represents of family Orchidaceae: Orchis<br />

laxiflora Lam., Serapias lingua L., and S. vomeracea (Burm) Briq.<br />

REEDS<br />

Under natural conditions, the reeds reach Phragmites communis Trin. Its most<br />

intesive development is on swampy, boggy and peat-boggy soils with a sufficient<br />

water layer above the soil surface 60-80 cm. On dry or drying-up habitats the reed can<br />

only develop if the ground water level is high (not deeper than 3-4 cm below the<br />

surface)(N i k o l a j e v s k i j , V. G. 1971.).<br />

Uniform constituents of reed by Phragmition communis W. Koch are located in<br />

pools and canals, in places, formed the islands that raised above the water. Specially,<br />

constituens of reed are well developed in area of Second evaporation. We believe that<br />

reed will continue to expand and occupy new water surface areas. This species is<br />

present as an accompanying element in the vegetation of wet meadows as well.<br />

In muddy coastal area, the community Juncetum maritime-acuti Hić. exists<br />

only in fragments. The component species of such community are Juncus acutus L.<br />

and J. maritimus Lam. Individual trees of taxon Tamarix africana Poiret can also<br />

frequently be found.<br />

RUDERAL VEGETATION<br />

Ruderal plants belong to a widespread type of vegetation inhabiting areas<br />

exposed to the intensive human influence. They can be found in the areas of<br />

permanent or temporary settlements of people and domestic animals, around roads,<br />

railroads, embankments … On the land around Salt-Work, ruderal vegetation is<br />

present along the whole road, on embankments along the railroad, and the elements<br />

of this flora are mixed with halophytes vegetation and on the embankments separating<br />

individual basins.


57<br />

Vuksanović & Petrović: THE FLORA AND VEGETATION OF SALT WORKS IN ULCINJ<br />

CONCLUSIONS<br />

The communities of halophyte plants are floristically poor, but ecologically very<br />

interesting, these plants are specifically adapted to cruel living conditions at their<br />

habitats. Development of tourism and strong urbanization in coastal part of<br />

Montenegro, cause for disappearing of several habitats of this type of vegetation<br />

(Topolica-Bar, Igalo). Preserved and not fragmentary communities of typical<br />

halophytes exist only on land around the Salt Works in Ulcinj and Tivatsko polje.<br />

Because that, Salt Works in Ulcinj are very important for preservation of these<br />

communities.<br />

Among the plants growing on Salt Works, Ophrys bertolonii Moretti, species<br />

from family Orchidaceae, is particularly interesting and important, and it is protected in<br />

Montenegro. Many representatives of this family are included in Red Lists in most of<br />

the countries of Europe, and there are some suggestions to protect them also in<br />

Montenegro.<br />

It is very important to mention the species of this family that are presented in the<br />

meadow flora on Salt Works, such as: Orchis laxiflora Lam., Serapias lingua L.i S.<br />

vomeracea (Burm.) Briqu..<br />

The finding concerning the subspecies Beta vulgaris ssp. maritime, up to now<br />

has been noted only at one locality (A d a m o v i c 1913, sand betwen Bar and Ulcinj).<br />

We consider that the most important sites of Salt Works regarding the flora and<br />

vegetation are localities with the best developed belt of halophyte and where we found<br />

the most interesting plants (species). The best development stands of euhalophyte are<br />

located by the Lake I, as well as on the embankment that separates Lake I from Lake<br />

II. The taxon Beta vulgaris ssp. maritime was found on this embankment, too, so we<br />

believe that area should be preserved from any intervention intended for the<br />

rehabilitation of Salt Works. On meadow situated between First evaporation and pools<br />

of Zoganj we found mentioned representatives of family Orchidaceae, and taxon<br />

Ophrys bertolonii Moretti was noted at the beginning of the path that separates<br />

Knete from Lake II.<br />

Therefore these localities should not be subjected to any interventions regarding<br />

the rehabilitation of Salt-Works.<br />

Domination of ruderal vegetation on Salt Works (except ground with large<br />

quantity of salt) shows that there is a strong influence of man and cattle. But<br />

halophyte vegetation is not exposed to grazing, because the cattle avoid plants with<br />

high contents of salt.<br />

SPECISMENS<br />

Ajuga chamaepitys (L.) Schreb<br />

Alkana tinctoria (L.) Tausch<br />

Anemone hortensis L.<br />

Anagalis arvensis L.<br />

Anchusa officinalis L.<br />

HABITAT<br />

near road, meadow<br />

near road<br />

near road, meadow<br />

near road, meadow<br />

meadow


58<br />

Natura Montenegrina, 6/2007<br />

Anthemis arvensis L.<br />

near road<br />

Aristolochia rotunda L.<br />

embankment with Tamarix (behind Zoganjski pools)<br />

Arum maculatum L.<br />

meadow<br />

Asphodelus microcarpus Viv.<br />

near pools of Zoganj<br />

Aster tripolium L.<br />

embankment with Tamarix (behind Zoganjski pools)<br />

Atriplex portulacoides L.<br />

around lake I, embankments<br />

Atriplex prostrata Boucher ex DC.<br />

around lake I, embankments<br />

Avena barbata Pott ex Link<br />

meadow near lake I<br />

Bellis perennis L<br />

near road, meadow<br />

Beta vulgaris ssp. maritima<br />

embankment between lake I and lake II<br />

Bidens tripartita L.<br />

near road, embankment behind Zoganjski pools<br />

Bituminaria bituminosa (L.) Stirton<br />

near road, meadow near lake I<br />

Blackstonia perfoliata (L.) Huds<br />

embankment behind Zoganjski pools<br />

Calepina irregularis (Asso) Thell<br />

near road, meadow near lake I<br />

Capsella bursa-pastoris (L.) Medicus<br />

near road, meadow near lake I<br />

Cardamine hirsuta L.<br />

near road, meadow near lake I<br />

Carex sp.<br />

meadow<br />

Centaurea alba L.<br />

embankment behind Zoganjski pools<br />

C. calcitrapa L. near road<br />

C. solstitialis L. near road<br />

Centaurium erythraea Rafn.<br />

meadow<br />

Cichorium intybus L<br />

near road<br />

Cirsium arvensis (L.) Scop<br />

near road, embankments<br />

Clematis viticella L.<br />

embankment behind pools of Zoganj<br />

Clinopodium vulgare L.<br />

near road, meadow<br />

Convolvulus arvensis L.<br />

near road, meadow<br />

Conyza canadensis (L.) Cronquist<br />

near road, meadow<br />

Coronopus squamatus (Forsskal) Asch. raised land near lake I<br />

Cynoglossum creticum Miller<br />

near road, meadow<br />

Dactylis glomerata L.<br />

meadow near lake I<br />

Daucus carota L.<br />

embankment behind pools of Zoganj<br />

Delphinium peregrinum L.<br />

near road above lake I<br />

Ditrichia viscosa (L.) Greuter<br />

near road, embankment behind pools of Zoganj<br />

Dorycnium hirsutum (L.) Ser.<br />

embankment behind pools of Zoganj<br />

Echium vulgare L.<br />

near road, meadow<br />

Epilobium hirsutum L.<br />

near canal behind pools of Zoganj<br />

Erigeron annuus (L.) Pers.<br />

near road, meadow<br />

Erodium cicutarium (L.) L’Her<br />

near road<br />

E. malacoides (L.) L’Her near road<br />

Eryngium amethistinum L.<br />

embankment behind pools of Zoganj<br />

Eupatorium cannabinum L.<br />

embankment behind pools of Zoganj<br />

Euphorbia helioscopia L.<br />

near road, meadow<br />

E. peplis L. near canal along lake I


59<br />

Vuksanović & Petrović: THE FLORA AND VEGETATION OF SALT WORKS IN ULCINJ<br />

E. peplus L. near road<br />

E. terracina L. near road toward Kneta<br />

E. seguieriana Necker near road toward Kneta<br />

Filago vulgaris Lam.<br />

near road<br />

Geranium columbinum L.<br />

near road<br />

G. dissectum L. near road<br />

G. robertianum L. near road, meadow<br />

G. brutim Gasparr. meadow<br />

Hyacinthus orientalis L.<br />

near road, meadow<br />

Helichrysum italicum (Roth.) G. Don<br />

near road<br />

Heliotropium europaeum L.<br />

near road, embankments<br />

Hordeum vulgare L.<br />

near road, meadow<br />

Hypericum perforatum L.<br />

near road, meadow<br />

Inula brittanica L.<br />

embankment behind pools of Zoganj<br />

I. crithmoides L. embankments<br />

Juncus acutus L.<br />

muddy places near pools of Zoganj<br />

J. maritimus Lam. muddy places near pools of Zoganj<br />

Kickxia commutata (Bernh. ex Reichenb.) meadow, embankment behind pools of Zoganj<br />

Fritisch<br />

Lamium purpureum L.<br />

near road<br />

Lathyrus cicera L.<br />

near road, meadow<br />

Limonium angustifolium (Tausch) Degen near pools, canals, on medow<br />

Linaria vulgaris Miller<br />

near road, meadow<br />

Linum nodiflorum L.<br />

near road, meadow<br />

L. usitatissimum L. meadow<br />

Lotus corniculatus L.<br />

near road, meadow<br />

Medicago minima (L.) L.<br />

near road, meadow<br />

Melilotus officinalis (L.) Pallas<br />

embankment, near road<br />

Moenchia mantica (L.) Bartl.<br />

meadow, embankment behind pools of Zoganj<br />

Muscari comosum (L.) Miller<br />

meadow, embankment between lake I and lake II<br />

Narcissus tazetta L.<br />

meadow<br />

Nigella damascena L.<br />

embankment behind pools of Zoganj<br />

Ophrys bertolonii Moretti<br />

road between first evaporation and Kneta<br />

Orchis laxiflora Lam.<br />

meadow<br />

Ornithogalum sp.<br />

near road, meadow<br />

Oxalis corniculata L.<br />

embankment behind pools of Zoganj<br />

Parentucellia latifolia (L.)Caruel<br />

meadow<br />

Petrorhagia prolifera (L.) P.W.Ball &<br />

near road, meadow<br />

Heywood<br />

Petrorhagia saxifraga (L.) Link.<br />

meadow<br />

Phragmites communis Trin<br />

pools, canals, humid medow<br />

Picris hieracioides L<br />

near road<br />

Plantago coronopus L.<br />

raised salt land


60<br />

Natura Montenegrina, 6/2007<br />

P. lanceolata L. near road<br />

P. major L. near road<br />

Polygonum aviculare L.<br />

along the road, embankment<br />

Portulaca oleracea L.<br />

embankment between lake I and lake II<br />

Prunella laciniata (L.) L.<br />

near road, meadow<br />

P. vulgaris L. near road, meadow<br />

Pulicaria dysenterica (L.) Bernh<br />

embankment behind pools of Zoganj<br />

Reseda phyteuma L.<br />

embankment behind pools of Zoganj<br />

<strong>Rom</strong>ulea bulbocodium (L.) Sebast.& Mauri near road, meadow<br />

Rosa canina L.<br />

embankment behind pools of Zoganj, near road<br />

toward Kneta<br />

Rubus idaeus L.<br />

embankment behind pools of Zoganj<br />

Salicornia herbacea L.<br />

salt, humid places<br />

Salsola soda L.<br />

salt, humid places<br />

Salvia verbenaca L.<br />

near road, meadow<br />

S. verticillata L. near road, meadow<br />

Scandix pectin-veneris L.<br />

near road<br />

Scolymus hispanicus L.<br />

near road, embankments<br />

Senecio rupestris Waldst. & Kit.<br />

near road<br />

Serapias lingua L.<br />

meadow between first evaporation and pools of<br />

Zoganj<br />

S. vomeracea (Burm.) Briqu. meadow between first evaporation and pools of<br />

Zoganj<br />

Sherardia arvensis L.<br />

meadow, near road<br />

Silene conica L.<br />

meadow<br />

Silene gallica L.<br />

meadow, near road<br />

Silene nocturna L.<br />

meadow<br />

Solanum nigrum L.<br />

embankments, near road<br />

Sonchus arvensis L.<br />

near road<br />

Spergularia salina<br />

raised salt land<br />

Stellaria media (L.) Vill.<br />

meadow, near road<br />

Suaeda maritime Dum.<br />

salt, humid places<br />

Tamarix africana Poir.<br />

humid medow<br />

Taraxacum officinale Weber<br />

meadow<br />

Teucrium chamaedrys L.<br />

meadow, near road<br />

Trifolium campestre Schreber<br />

meadow, near road<br />

T. incarnatum L. meadow<br />

T. nigricens Viv. meadow, near road<br />

T. resupinatum L. meadow<br />

T. subterraneum L. meadow<br />

Trigonella esculenta Willd.<br />

near road<br />

Verbascum sinuatum L.<br />

near road<br />

Verbena officinalis L.<br />

embankment behind pools of Zoganj, near road


61<br />

Vuksanović & Petrović: THE FLORA AND VEGETATION OF SALT WORKS IN ULCINJ<br />

Veronica arvensis L.<br />

meadow<br />

V. chamaedrys L. meadow, near road<br />

Vicia grandiflora Scop.<br />

meadow, near road<br />

Vicia sativa L. subsp. nigra (L.) Ehrh.<br />

meadow, near road<br />

Vincetoxucum hirundinaria Medicus<br />

embankment behind pools of Zoganj<br />

LITERATURE<br />

D O M A C , R. 1967: Ekskurzijska flora Hrvtske i susjednih područja. - Institut za<br />

botaniku sveučilišta u Zagrebu. Zagreb, 543pp.<br />

JANKOVIĆ , M., S T E V A N O V I Ć , V. 1983: Prilog poznavanju slatinske vegetacije<br />

Boke Kotorske. - Zbornik Roberta Visianija Šibenčanina, Muzej grada Šibenika<br />

10:377-396<br />

HORVATIĆ , S. 1934: Flora i vegetacija otoka Paga. - Prir. istraž. Jugosl. Akad. znan. i<br />

umjetnosti, Zagreb. 19: 116-372.<br />

HORVATIĆ , S. 1963: Vegetacijska karta otoka Paga s općim pregledom<br />

vegetacijskih jedinica Hrvatskog primorja. Prir. istraz., Acta Biol. IV/33: 5 - 187.<br />

JAZU, Zagreb<br />

J A V O R K A , S., C S A P O D Y , V. 1934: Iconographia florae Hungaricae, Budapest.<br />

576 pp.<br />

K A R A M A N , V. 1997: Flora istočnog dijela Bokokotorskog zaliva. Magistarski rad. - Biološki<br />

fakultet, Beograd ( manuscr.). 186 pp.<br />

NIKOLAJEVSKIJ, V. G. 1971: Research into the Biology of the Common Reed<br />

(Phragmites communis Trin.) in the U.S.S.R. - Folia-geobotanica Phytotaxonomica<br />

6/2: 221 – 230. Czechoslovak Academy of Sciences, Praha.<br />

P A R O L L Y , G. 1992: Die Orchideenflora Montenegros. - AHO Mitteilungsblatt,<br />

Baden Wuertenberg 24 (2): 141 -391<br />

P I G N A T T I , S. 1982: Flora d' Italia. 1-3. - Edagricole, Bologna<br />

PULEVIĆ , V. 2005: Građa za floru <strong>Crne</strong> <strong>Gore</strong>. - Republički zavod za zaštitu prirode,<br />

Podgorica, 218 pp.<br />

R O H L E N A , J. 1942: Conspectus florae Montenegrinae 20-21: 1-506.- Preslia,<br />

Praha.<br />

T U T I N , T. G., HEYWOOD, V. H., BURGES, N. A. MOORE., VALENTINE, D. H.,<br />

WALTERS, S. M., WEBB, D. A. (eds) 1964-1980: Flora Europaea 1-5<br />

Cambridge.<br />

T U T I N , T. G., BURGES, N. A., CHATER, A. O., EDMONDS, J. R., HEYWOOD, V.<br />

H., MOORE, D. M., VALENTINE, D. H., WALTERS, S. M. & WEBB, D. A. 1993:<br />

Flora Europaea. Vol. 1. - Sec. ed. Cambridge. 581pp.<br />

Received: 24. 11. 2007.


62<br />

Natura Montenegrina, 6/2007


NATURA MONTENEGRINA, PODGORICA, 6:63-71<br />

CONTRIBUTION TO THE KNOWLEDGE OF DISTRIBUTION AND SEASONAL<br />

DYNAMICS OF THE PLANCTONIC POLYCHETA IN SOUTH ADRIATIC WATERS<br />

Vera VUKANIĆ 1<br />

1<br />

Faculty of Technical Science, Departmant of Technics, Chemistry and Biology, The University of Novi<br />

Pazar, Vuka Karadzica bb, Novi Pazar, Serbia; v_vukanic@yahoo.com<br />

Key words:<br />

polycheta,<br />

Tomopteris elegans,<br />

Adriatic,<br />

Bay of Boka Kotorska,<br />

distribution<br />

Synopsis<br />

This paper presents the first data about seasonal<br />

overveiw of horisontal distribution and abundance for the<br />

genus Polycheta in Bay of Boka Kotorska. The only<br />

determined species was Tomopteris elegans Chun, which is<br />

present throughout the Adriatic Sea, but as it has a quite<br />

narrow ecological valence its abundance is much greater in<br />

deep open waters of the Adriatic than in the coastal waters.<br />

Also presented are seasonal oscillations and quantitative<br />

presence of Polycheta population during 2002.<br />

Ključne riječi:<br />

Polycheta,<br />

Tomoperis elegans,<br />

Jadran,<br />

Bokokotorski zaliv,<br />

distribucija<br />

Sinopsis<br />

PRILOG POZNAVANJU DISTRIBUCIJE I SEZONSKE<br />

DINAMIKE PLANKTONSKIH POLIHETA U JUŽNOM<br />

JADRANU<br />

U radu iznosimo prve pregledne podatke o sezonskoj<br />

horizontalnoj distribuciji i abundanciji roda Polycheta u<br />

Bokokotorskom zalivu. Determinisana je samo vrsta<br />

Tomopteris elegans Chun, koja je prisutna u cijelom Jadranu.<br />

Ova vrsta ima prilično usku ekološku valencu, tako da ima<br />

mnogo veću abundanciju u pučinskim dubokim vodama<br />

Jadrana nego u priobalnim vodama. Takođe smo prikazali<br />

sezonske oscilacije i kvantitativno prisustvo cijele grupe<br />

Polycheta tokom 2002. godine.


64<br />

Natura Montenegrina, 6/2007<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

Geographic position and specific ecological conditions make Bay of Boka Kotorska<br />

a distinct biotope. The interactive relationships of its wildlife are influenced by influx of<br />

freshwater from the mainland as well as the currents from the open sea. Therefore, we<br />

tried to use the data collected in one-year cycle of study in order to determine the<br />

main regularities in oscillations of ecological parameters, important for fluctuations in<br />

diversity of Polycheta biocenosis. Research on pelagic polychaetes in Adriatic had<br />

started alredy in the 19 centry. The first data were collected in Northern Adriatic<br />

(B u s c h , 1851; V e j d o v s k i , 1876; A p s t e i n , 1893; B a l d a s s e r o n i , 1914) and<br />

Otrant strata (R o s a , 1912). Data for eastern coast and South Adriatic are mentioned<br />

only in recent times (K n e ž e v i ć , 1942; G a m u l i n , 1948, 1979; H u r e , 1961;<br />

Vukanić ,D., 1975.; B a t i s t i ć et al. 2004; V u k a n i ć ,V., 2004). H u r e (1961) cited<br />

the following species for the open waters of South Adriatic: Loperorhynchus<br />

uncinatus, Alciopa cantrainii, Vanadis formosa, Tomopteris helgolandica, Tomopteris<br />

elegans. Tomopteris elegans is the most common Adriatic species cited by H u r e<br />

(1955). V u k a n i ć ,D. (1975) presented data on participation of polychaetes in total<br />

zooplankton of coastal waters of open South Adriatic with 0.80% and at 6 NM off the<br />

shore with 0.17%. G a m u l i n (1979) cited the species recorded by Zei in 1956:<br />

Tomopteris elegans, T. helgolandica, Alciope contrainii, Vanadis formosa and V.<br />

crystallina. Batistić et al. (2004) when discussing material collected on a cruise<br />

from April 1993 to February 1994, cited the following species for the South Adriatic:<br />

Tomopteris elegans, Callizonella lepidota, Callizona nasuta, Pelagobia longicirrata,<br />

Sagitella kowalevskii, Travisiopsis lanceolata i Typhloscolex muelleri.<br />

MATERIALS AND METHOD<br />

Study area - Boka Kotorska Bay is situated in the southeastern part of Adriatic.<br />

Its geographical position is determined by key points: 42º31'N, 42º23'32''S,<br />

18º46'32''E and 18º30'29W. It penetrates into the mainland for 28 km and is composed<br />

of four interconnected bays: Herceg Novi Bay (which directly communicates with the<br />

open sea), Tivat Bay, as well as the inner bays, Risan and Kotor. The surrounding<br />

mainland is a karstic area, arid during summer, while in autumn, winter and early<br />

spring it has the most plentiful precipitation in Europe (6000 mm). Boka Kotorska Bay<br />

is under a strong influence of waters from deep southern Adriatic and the entering<br />

Eastern Mediterranean current from one side, while on the other side there is a huge<br />

influx of freshwater from the surrounding mainland in autumn and winter-spring<br />

season, making it a very dynamic system with specific physical-chemical and<br />

biological characteristics. At the southwest, in front of the entrance to Boka Kotorska<br />

Bay, there is a point where the greatest depth of Adriatic Sea was measured (1330m).


65<br />

Vukanić: CONTRIBUTION TO THE KNOWLEDGE OF DISTRIBUTION AND . . .<br />

Fig.1. Map of sampling area in southern Adriatic - Bay of Boka Kotorska: 1. P-IBM<br />

(Sampling point near the Marine Biology Institute); 2. P-K (Sampling point in central part of<br />

Kotor’s Bay); 3. P-O (Sampling point near Orahovac); 4. P-R (Sampling point in central part of<br />

Risan’s Bay); 5. P-M (Sampling point near Morinj); 6. P-T (Sampling point in central part of<br />

Tivat’ Bay); 7. P-HN (Sampling point in central part of Herceg Novi’s Bay).<br />

Sampling - Zooplankton was sampled in 2002, on 25 th each month, at seven<br />

stations. The plankton nets used were of Nansen type, either surface area of the<br />

opening 1/4m 2 - length 2.5m, or surface area of the opening 1m 2 - length 3.5m. The<br />

density of the mesh was 150µm and 200µm. Vertical samples were taken from 10m to<br />

0m at the shallow stations of each bay. The collected zooplankton material was<br />

fixated on the ship, in 2.5% formaldehyde-sea water. The qualitative quantitative<br />

analyses were done in the laboratory from the representative sample of 1/25 of total<br />

catch, under the stereomicroscope and binocular lens. After that, the whole catch was<br />

carefully analyzed in order to record any rare species. The quantity was presented as<br />

number of individuals under m -2 below sea surface (ind.m -2 ). Temperature, salinity,


66<br />

Natura Montenegrina, 6/2007<br />

pH, oxygen saturation and percent oxygen saturation were measured in situ with a<br />

probe Multiline P-4, at 0.5m, 2m, 5m and 10m in the shallow part of the Bay near the<br />

coast, and at 0.5 m, 10m, 15m, 20m and 30m of depth at central deep stations. The<br />

transparency of the sea was measured with Secchi disk, 30 cm in diameter, of white<br />

color. Color of the sea was measured according to Forell from I to XXI.<br />

RESULTS AND DICUSSION<br />

Environmental conditions - The maximal temperature (27.7ºC) was recorded in<br />

July, while the medium maximal temperature of all layers was 25.3ºC. The minimal<br />

temperature (10ºC) was recorded in Risan Bay (P 2 -R) in February. The salinity of the<br />

sea varied within the values 7.9‰ - 38.71‰, and the lowest value ever recorded in the<br />

Bay was registered at the shallow station P-IBM in the surface layer 0-5m, 2.30‰ in<br />

September. Oxygen saturation varied from 4.68mL/L at the surface of Herceg Novi<br />

Bay (P 4 -HN) in June and July to 33.7mL/L at the 10 m depth at shallow station P-O in<br />

June. The percent of oxygen saturation was over 100%, and the greatest value was<br />

recorded at the shallow station P-O in June (220%), while at the surface at the middle<br />

of Kotor Bay (P 1 -K) it was 117%. The high values of oxygen saturation, which<br />

exceeded 100% throughout the year, show that the Bay is a biotope with a high<br />

degree of trophic activity. The whole Bay had relatively low values of transparency,<br />

from 4 m in Kotor Bay (P 1 -K) in September, to 15 m in Herceg Novi Bay (P 4 -HN) in<br />

January. The color of the sea according to Forell ranged from II in June to VI in<br />

September.<br />

Policheta general distribution – Polychaetes have occasionally been recorded<br />

in small numbers in Bay of Boka Kotorska. Their percentage participation within the<br />

whole zooplankton was: in Bay of Kotor 0.11%, in Bay of Risan 0.22%, in Bay of Tivat<br />

0.21% in Bay of Hercegnovi 0.73%. They are the most abundant during the autumn<br />

season. We have determined the species Tomopteris elegans Chun, which was<br />

occasionally recorded at all stations.<br />

18000<br />

16000<br />

14000<br />

12000<br />

10000<br />

8000<br />

6000<br />

4000<br />

2000<br />

0<br />

Polycheta [TOTAL]<br />

I II III IV V VI VII VIII IX X XI XII<br />

Fig.1. Oscillations of abundance of Polycheta group in Bay of Boka Kotorska during the study


67<br />

Vukanić: CONTRIBUTION TO THE KNOWLEDGE OF DISTRIBUTION AND . . .<br />

Postaje<br />

Sezone<br />

P-IBM P-O P-M P 1 -K P 2 -R P 3 -T P 4 -HN<br />

Zima 200 200 200 600 1200 400 100<br />

Proljeće 300 1100 1100 900 1000 100 600<br />

Ljeto 100 800 600 700 200 200 600<br />

Jesen 200 3100 600 4100 2300 2700 12600<br />

% 0.1 0.5 0.34 0.11 0.22 0.21 0.73<br />

Tab.1. Percentage participation of Polycheta group (ind/m 2 ) in total zooplankton during the study<br />

Polycheta<br />

Total zooplankton<br />

18000<br />

16000<br />

14000<br />

12000<br />

10000<br />

8000<br />

6000<br />

4000<br />

2000<br />

0<br />

I II III IV V VI VII VIII IX X XI XII<br />

5000000<br />

4000000<br />

3000000<br />

2000000<br />

1000000<br />

0<br />

Fig.2. Logarithm presentation of oscillations in abundance<br />

of total zooplankton and the polychaete group<br />

Tomopteris elegans Chun was the most abundant pelagic polychaete in the<br />

Adriatic. It was occasionally recorded at all stations in Boka Kotorska Bay, in<br />

insignificant number or as single individuals; it was more common and abundant in the<br />

Bay of Herceg Novi in autumn season. The percentage participation of this species<br />

within the total number of polychaete in the Bay was 3.27%. This species does not<br />

tolerate large variations in hydrographic factors, has a quite narrow ecological valence<br />

and therefore much larger abundance in the open sea waters of the Adriatic.<br />

400<br />

300<br />

200<br />

100<br />

0<br />

Tomopteris elegans<br />

I II III IV V VI VII VIII IX X XI XII<br />

Fig.3. Oscillations of abundance of species Tomopteris elegans in<br />

Bay of Boka Kotorska during the study


68<br />

Natura Montenegrina, 6/2007<br />

The larval stages of polychaetes were very abundant. The smaller maximum of<br />

abundance was recorded in March and April and the larger maximum in October and<br />

November. The percentage participation of larval stages in total number of recorded<br />

polychaete specimens was 71.27%. The other individuals of this group participated<br />

with 20.20% in total number of polychaetes. These are the first data on this group of<br />

organisms for Bay of Boka Kotorska.<br />

Polycheta larvae<br />

30000<br />

25000<br />

20000<br />

15000<br />

10000<br />

5000<br />

0<br />

I II III IV V VI VII VIII IX X XI XII<br />

Fig.4. Oscillations of abundance of Polycheta larvae in Bay of Boka Kotorska during the study<br />

Bay of Kotor<br />

Bay of Risan<br />

Policheta larvae<br />

Policheta sp.<br />

Tomopteris elegans<br />

Policheta larvae<br />

Policheta sp.<br />

Tomopteris elegans<br />

Bay of Tivat<br />

Bay of Hercegnovi<br />

Policheta larvae<br />

Policheta sp.<br />

Tomopteris elegans<br />

Policheta larvae<br />

Policheta sp.<br />

Tomopteris elegans<br />

Fig.6. Percentage participation of certain taxa from Polycheta group, for each bay separately


69<br />

Vukanić: CONTRIBUTION TO THE KNOWLEDGE OF DISTRIBUTION AND . . .<br />

Fig.5. Oscillations of abundance of Polycheta group throughout the year, for each bay separately<br />

Bay of Kotor<br />

4000<br />

3500<br />

3000<br />

2500<br />

2000<br />

1500<br />

1000<br />

500<br />

0<br />

I II III IV V VI VII VIII IX X XI XII<br />

Polychaeta larvae<br />

Tomopteris elegans<br />

Polycheta sp.<br />

1800<br />

1600<br />

1400<br />

1200<br />

1000<br />

800<br />

600<br />

400<br />

200<br />

0<br />

Bay of Risan<br />

I II III IV V VI VII VIII IX X XI XII<br />

Polychaeta larvae<br />

Tomopteris elegans<br />

Polycheta sp.<br />

2000<br />

1800<br />

1600<br />

1400<br />

1200<br />

1000<br />

800<br />

600<br />

400<br />

200<br />

0<br />

Bay of Tivat<br />

I II III IV V VI VII VIII IX X XI XII<br />

Polychaeta larvae<br />

Tomopteris elegans<br />

Polycheta sp.


70<br />

Natura Montenegrina, 6/2007<br />

Bay of Hercegnovi<br />

12000<br />

10000<br />

8000<br />

6000<br />

4000<br />

Polychaeta larvae<br />

Tomopteris elegans<br />

Polycheta sp.<br />

2000<br />

0<br />

I II III IV V VI VII VIII IX X XI XII<br />

CONCLUSIONS<br />

Bay of Boka Kotorska is a typical neritic area of the eastern coast of Southern<br />

Adriatic. In the zooplankton biocenosis of the Bay we have recorded a great<br />

abundance of larval and juvenile forms. A large number of species was recorded in<br />

Polychaete group longitudinally from the inner bay (Bay of Kotor and Bay of Risan)<br />

toward the other bays (Bay of Tivat and Bay of Herceg Novi), together with a high<br />

abundance of larval forms toward the inner bays.<br />

REFERENCES<br />

APSTEIN,C., 1893: Die Alciopiden der Berliner Zool. Sammlung. – Arch. Naturg.<br />

59(1).<br />

B A L D A S S E R O N I ,V., 1914: Nota sui Tifloscolecidi raccolti della R.N. ‘’Ciclope’’<br />

nelle crociere III-IV. – R.Com. Tal. It. Mem. 38, 1-19.<br />

BATISTIĆ ,M., K R Š I N I Ć , F., JASPRICA, N., CARIĆ , M., V I L I Č I Ć ,<br />

LUČ O Ć , D.& D. 2004: Gelatinous Invertebrate Zooplankton of the South<br />

Adriatic: Species Composition and Vertical Distribution. Journal of Plankton<br />

Research, Vol.26. (3). p.1-16.<br />

B U S C H ,W., 1851: Beobachtungen über Anatomie und Entwicklung einiger<br />

werbelloser Seetiere. 1 – 143. Berlin.<br />

G A M U L I N ,T., 1948: Prilog poznavanju zooplanktona srednjedalmatinskog otočnog<br />

područja. Acta Adriatica, 3(7), 159-194.<br />

G A M U L I N , T., 1979: Zooplankton istočne obale Jadranskog mora. Acta Biologica,<br />

8/j – 10, prir. istr., 43,p.177-217.


71<br />

Vukanić: CONTRIBUTION TO THE KNOWLEDGE OF DISTRIBUTION AND . . .<br />

H U R E , J., 1955: Distribution annuelle verticale du zooplancton sur une station de<br />

l'Adriatique meridionale.–Acta Adriatica, 7(7),1–72.<br />

H U R E , J., 1961: Dnevna migracija i sezonska vertikalna raspodjela zooplanktona<br />

dubljeg mora.–Ibid., 9(6),1–60).<br />

KNEŽEVIĆ , M.,1942: Prilog poznavanju geografske rasprostranjenosti Tomopterida<br />

u Jadranskom moru. – Vter. Arh., 12(11), 495-496.<br />

R O S A , D., 1912: Nota sui Tomopteridi dell Adriatico raccoleti Navi ‘’Montebello’’ e<br />

‘’Ciclope’’. – R.Com. Tal. Ital., Mem. 26,1-10.<br />

V E J D O V S K I , F., 1878: Beiträge der Tomopteriden. – Zeitschr. Wiss. Zool. 31.<br />

VUKANIĆ ,D., 1975: Prilog poznavanju zooplanktona obalnih voda južnog Jadrana.<br />

Ekologija/Acta Biologica Jugoslavica/.10,1 , 79–106.<br />

VUKANIĆ ,V., 2004: Ekološka studija zooplanktona u funkciji analize stanja i zaštite<br />

biodiverziteta Bokokotorskog zaliva; (Magistarska teza) Biološki fakultet,<br />

Univerziteta u Beogradu, SiCG p.1-128.<br />

Z E I ,M., 1956: Pelagic Polychaetes of the Adriatic. – Thalassia Jugosl., 1,2, 33-68.<br />

Received: 02. 10. 2007.


72<br />

Natura Montenegrina, 6/2007


NATURA MONTENEGRINA, PODGORICA, 6:73-89<br />

A CONTRIBUTION TO THE KNOWLEDGE OF THE DRAGONFLIES (ODONATA) OF<br />

THE RIVER ZETA (MONTENEGRO)<br />

Bogić GLIGOROVIĆ 1) , Vladimir PEŠIĆ 2) & Aleksandra Z E K O V I Ć 1)<br />

1<br />

Department of Biology, Faculty of Sciences, University of Montenegro, Cetinjski put b.b., 81000 Podgorica,<br />

Montenegro (bogic1@cg.yu)<br />

2<br />

Department of Biology, Faculty of Sciences, University of Montenegro, Cetinjski put b.b., 81000 Podgorica,<br />

Montenegro (pesicv@cg.yu)<br />

Key words:<br />

dragonflies,<br />

new records,<br />

faunistics,<br />

the Zeta River,<br />

Montenegro.<br />

Synopsis<br />

An updated list of the dragonflies (Odonata) of the<br />

River Zeta (Montenegro) is given, including 27 species.<br />

Three of them: Aeshna afinis Vander Linden, Lestes barbarus<br />

(Fabricius) and Gomphus vulgatisimus (Linneus) are new for<br />

fauna of Montenegro.<br />

Ključne riječi:<br />

vilini konjici,<br />

novi nalazi,<br />

faunistika,<br />

rijeka Zeta,<br />

Crna Gora.<br />

Sinopsis<br />

PRILOG POZNAVANJU ODONATA (Odonata) RIJEKE ZETE<br />

(CRNA GORA)<br />

U radu je data lista vilinih konica (Odonata) rijeke Zete<br />

(Crna Gora), koja uključuje 27 vrsta. Tri vrste: Aeshna afinis<br />

Vander Linden, Lestes barbarus (Fabricius) and Gomphus<br />

vulgatisimus (Linneus) nove su za faunu <strong>Crne</strong> <strong>Gore</strong>.<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

Although the order Odonata is an important group among the insects, studies of<br />

the Odonata fauna in Montenegro are too few (e.g., A d a m o v i ć , 1949, 1996;<br />

Adamović et al., 1996). The aim of our studies is both to give a new insight in the<br />

fauna of the country, and to obtain valuable documentation of the occurence of<br />

dragonflies in the previously unstudied area of the River Zeta. In the course of this<br />

survey, we detected 27 species, among them 3 are new for the fauna of Montenegro.


74<br />

Natura Montenegrina, 6/2007<br />

FIGURE 1. Map of study area<br />

with the sampling sites.<br />

MATERIALS AND METHODS<br />

In 2006-2007 the dragonflies fauna from 8 sampling sites on the River Zeta were<br />

studied (Fig. 1). The River Zeta is the main tributary of the River Morača and belongs<br />

to the drainage basin of the Skadar Lake, which is the largest lake of the Balkan<br />

Peninsula, with a surface area varying between 370 and 600 km 2 . Lakes Skadar and<br />

Ohrid and the River Drim, compose the largest river system in the western Balkan<br />

zoogeographic region (B ă n ă rescu, 1992), and drains in to the Adriatic Sea basin.


75<br />

Gligorović & a l . A CONTRIBUTION TO THE KNOWLEDGE OF THE DRAGONFLIES . . .<br />

It starts near Nikšić, under the Planinica hill with a mean discharge in its mouth of 74<br />

m 3 s -1 , (M a r t i n o v i ć -Vitanović & Kalifatić , 1995), flows eastwards for 86 km<br />

until it confluxes into the Morača River near Podgorica.<br />

Odonata specimens were collected with aerial nets. Specimens were put into<br />

envelopes and transported to the lab. All the specimens were deposited in the<br />

collection of the first author. B e s c h o v s k i (1994) were used for identification of the<br />

specimens. Unless stated otherwise, all material has been collected by the first<br />

author. The composition of the material is given as: (males/females/larvae).<br />

RESULTS<br />

Subordo Zygoptera<br />

Family Calopterygidae<br />

Calopteryx virgo (Linneaus, 1758)<br />

Distribution: Palaearctic.<br />

Material: Studenci, 5 May 2007 (0/0/1), 30 June 2007 (2/0/0); Slap Zete, 9<br />

March 2007 (0/0/2), 16 April 2007 (0/0/1), 5 May 2007 (2/0/0), 13 July 2007 (2/1/1);<br />

Danilovgrad, 21 July 2007 (2/1/0), 26 August 2007 (2/0/0); Martinići, 18 May 2007<br />

(0/0/3), 21 June 2007 (3/2/1), 13 July 2007 (1/1/0); Dobro Polje, 21 July 2007 (2/2/0);<br />

Tunjevo, 21 June 2007 (2/1/2), 30 June 2007 (2/0/0), 13 July 2007 (2/1/0); Glava<br />

Zete, 9 March 2007 (0/0/2), Vidrovan.13 July 2007 (2/1/0).<br />

Calopteryx splendens ( Harris, 1782)<br />

Distribution: Palaearctic.<br />

Material: Studenci, 9 March 2007 (0/0/1), 30 June 2007 (1/2/1); Danilovgrad, 21<br />

June 2007 (3/1/0); Martinići, 16 April 2007 (0/0/2), 5 May 2007 (2/0/0), 30 June 2007<br />

(2/1/0); Tunjevo, 13 July 2007 (3/2/0), 26 August 2007 (1/1/3); Glava Zete, 21 June<br />

2007 (3/1/1); Vidrovan, 14 July 2007 (2/1/1).<br />

Family Platycnemidae<br />

Platycnemis pennipes (Pallas, 1771)<br />

Distribution: Mediterranean.<br />

Material: Martinići 13 July 2007 (2/2/1).<br />

Family Lestidae<br />

Lestes sponsa (Hensemann, 1823)<br />

Distribution: Palaearctic.<br />

Material: Vidrovan, source 14 July 2007 (2/1/0).<br />

Remarks: New for Monenegro.


76<br />

Natura Montenegrina, 6/2007<br />

Lestes dryas Kirby, 1890<br />

Distribution: Holarctic.<br />

Material: Vidrovan, source, 14.07.2007 (2/0/0).<br />

Lestes barbarus (Fabricius, 1798)<br />

Distribution: Holomediterranean.<br />

Material: Studenci, 21.06.2007 (3/1/2); Danilovgrad, 26.08.2007 (1/1/0);<br />

Martinići, 21.07.2007 (1/1/0); Dobro Polje, 18.05.2007 leg. Zeković (1/1/0);Tunjevo,<br />

30.06.2007 (1/1/0),<br />

Remarks: New for Montenegro.<br />

Family Coenagrionidae<br />

Ischnura elegans (Vander Linden, 1820)<br />

Distribution: Palaearctic.<br />

Material: Martinići, 21 June 2007 (2/2/0); Dobro Polje, 30 June 2007 (2/2/0);<br />

Vidrovan, 14 July 2007 (2/0/0).<br />

Ischnura pumilo (Charpentier, 1825)<br />

Distribution: Mediterranean.<br />

Material: Tunjevo 30 June 2007 (3/2/0); Glava Zete, 30 June 2007 (2/2/0).<br />

Coenagrion ornatum (Sélys, 1850)<br />

Distribution: Euro-mediterranean.<br />

Material: Slap Zete, 21 June 2007 (2/1/0); Danilovgrad, 18 May 2007 (2/1/0), 30<br />

June 2007 (2/2/0); Martinići, 26 August 2007 (2/1/0); Dobro Polje, 21 July 2007<br />

(2/1/0); Tunjevo, 13 July 2007 (2/2/0); Glava Zete 13 July 2007 (2/2/0).<br />

Coenagrion hastulatum (Charpentier, 1840)<br />

Distribution: Euro-siberian.<br />

Material: Slap Zete, 5 May 2007 (2/2/0), 21 June 2007 (3/2/0); Vidrovan, 14 July<br />

2007 (3/2/0).<br />

Coenagrion puella (Linneus, 1758)<br />

Distribution: Euro-mediterranean.<br />

Material: Martinići, 21 June 2007 (1/1/0); Dobro Polje, 26 August 2007 (1/1/0);<br />

Tunjevo, 13 July 2007 (2/1/0), Glava Zete, 30 June 2007 leg. Zeković (2/2/0);<br />

Vidrovan, 14 July 2007 (1/1/0).<br />

Erythromma viridulum (Charpentier, 1840)<br />

Distribution: Holomediterranean.<br />

Material: Tunjevo, 30 June 2007 (2/2/0), 13 July 2007 leg.Zeković (1/1/0).


77<br />

Gligorović & a l . A CONTRIBUTION TO THE KNOWLEDGE OF THE DRAGONFLIES . . .<br />

Subordo Anisoptera<br />

Family Aeshnidae<br />

Aeshna afinis Vander Linden, 1820<br />

Distribution: Euro-mediterranean.<br />

Material: Slap Zete, 26 August 2007 (2/1/0); Dobro Polje, 18 May 2007 leg.<br />

Zeković (0/0/1), 13 July 2007 (1/1/0).<br />

Remarks: New for Monenegro<br />

Aeshna cyanea (Müller, 1764)<br />

Distribution: Europe.<br />

Material: Vidrovan, izvor, 14 July 2007 (1/1/2).<br />

Family Libellulidae<br />

Orthetrum anceps (Schneider, 1845)<br />

Distribution: East Mediterranean.<br />

Material: Danilovgrad, 30 June 2007 (2/1/0); Martinići, 21 July 2007 (3/0/0);<br />

Dobro Polje, 30 June 2007 (1/2/2); Tunjevo, 26 August 2007 (0/1/0); Vidrovan, 14 July<br />

2007 (2/1/0).<br />

Orthetrum cancellatum ( Linnaeus, 1758)<br />

Distribution: Euro-siberian.<br />

Material: Slap Zete, 13 July 2007 (2/1/0); Martinići, 30 June 2007 leg. Zeković<br />

(1/1/2); Tunjevo, 30 June 2007 (1/0/0).<br />

Crocothemis erythraea (Brullé, 1823)<br />

Distribution: Mediterranean.<br />

Material: Danilovgrad, 30 June 2007 (2/1/2); Martinići, 26 August 2007 (2/0/0).<br />

Libelulla depressa (Linnaeus, 1758)<br />

Distribution: Europe<br />

Material: Danilovgrad, 30 June 2007 (4/2/4); Martinići, 21 July 2007 (3/0/0);<br />

Dobro Polje, 21 June 2007 (3/1/3); Tunjevo, 13 July 2007 (3/2/0); Glava Zete, 9 March<br />

2007 leg. Zeković (0/0/4), 26 August 2007 (4/0/0); Vidrovan, 14 July 2007 (2/1/2).<br />

Sympetrum flaveolum (Linnaeus, 1758)<br />

Distribution: Palaearctic.<br />

Material: Tunjevo, 13 July 2007 (2/0/0), 21 July 2007 (2/1/1).<br />

Sympetrum meridionale (Sélys, 1841)<br />

Distribution: Mediterranean.


78<br />

Natura Montenegrina, 6/2007<br />

Material: Studenci, 18 May 2007 (2/0/0), 13 July 2007 (2/1/1); Slap Zete, 26<br />

August 2007 (2/0/0),<br />

Sympetrum striolatum (Charpentier, 1840)<br />

Distribution: Palaearctic.<br />

Material: Studenci, 18 May 2007 (2/1/0); Slap Zete, 26 August 2007 (2/2/2);<br />

Danilovgrad 21 July 2007 (2/1/1), 26 August 2007 (2/0/0); Glava Zete, 5 May 2007<br />

leg.Zeković (2/0/0), 30 June 2007 (2/2/1); Vidrovan 14 July 2007 (1/0/0).<br />

Sympetrum sanquineum ( Müller, 1764)<br />

Distribution: Euro-mediterranean.<br />

Material: Martinići, 21 July 2007 (2/1/2).<br />

Family Cordulegastridae<br />

Cordulegaster bidentatus (Sélys, 1843)<br />

Distribution: Mediterranean.<br />

Material: Studenci, 16 April 2007 (0/0/2), 5 May 2007 (0/0/1), 13 July 2007<br />

(2/1/0), 21 July 2007 (2/0/0), 26 August 2007 (0/1/0); Tunjevo, 21 June 2007 (2/2/2),<br />

30 June 2007 (2/0/0), 13 July 2007 (2/1/0); Vidrovan, 14 July 2007 (3/1/2).<br />

Family Cordulidae<br />

Somatochlora metallica (Vander Linden, 1825)<br />

Distribution: Euro-siberian subregion.<br />

Material: Slap Zete, 30 June 2007 (2/1/0), 13 July 2007 (2/1/0), 21 July 2007<br />

(2/0/0); Danilovgrad, 13 July 2007 leg. Zeković (2/3/0); Dobro Polje, 21 July 2007<br />

(2/0/0); Tunjevo, 30 June 2007 (2/1/1); Glava Zete, 21 June 2007 (2/2/0); Vidrovan,<br />

14July 2007 (2/1/2).<br />

Family Gomphidae<br />

Gomphus flavipes (Charpentier, 1825)<br />

Distribution: Euro-siberian subregion.<br />

Material: Studenci, 30 June 2007 (3/3/4), Slap Zete, 21 June 2007 (2/1/3), 30<br />

June 2007 leg. Zeković (2/2/2); Danilovgrad, 30 June 2007 (2/0/0), Martinići, 21 June<br />

2007 (2/2/4), 26 August 2007 (0/1/0), Dobro Polje, 21 July 2007 (2/0/0), Tunjevo, 30<br />

June 2007 (1/0/0), 13 July 2007 (3/2/3), Glava Zete, 30 June 2007. (2/1/3), Vidrovan,<br />

14 July 2007 (3/1/2).<br />

Gomphus vulgatissimus (Linnaeus, 1758)<br />

Distribution: European subregion.


79<br />

Gligorović & a l . A CONTRIBUTION TO THE KNOWLEDGE OF THE DRAGONFLIES . . .<br />

Material: Studenci, 21 June 2007 (2/1/2); Slap Zete, 21 July 2007 (3/3/4); Dobro<br />

Polje, 5 May 2007 (1/0/0), 18 May 2007 (1/1/2), 21 June 2007 leg. Zeković (2/0/0);<br />

Tunjevo, 21 June 2007 (1/2/2); Glava Zete, 21 July 2007 (3/1/1); Vidrovan, 14 July<br />

2007 (1/1/2).<br />

Remarks: New for Montenegro<br />

Onychogomphus forcipatus (Linnaeus, 1758)<br />

Distribution: Holomediterranean subregion.<br />

Material: Studenci, 16 April 2007 (2/0/0), 21 June 2007 (3/2/3); Tunjevo, 30 June<br />

2007 (1/1/3), 13 July 2007 (1/2/3); Glava Zete, 18 May 2007 (3/1/4), 21 June 2007<br />

(3/2/2); Vidrovan, 14 July 2007 (2/1/2).<br />

DISCUSSION<br />

In the freshwater habitats of the River Zeta 27 species of dragonflies (Odonata)<br />

belonging to 15 genera and 9 families were recorded at 8 sites. Of these, 3 species:<br />

Aeshna afinis Vander Linden, Lestes barbarus (Fabricius) and Gomphus vulgatisimus<br />

(Linneus) are recorded from Montenegro for the first time.<br />

The total number of specimens of dragonflies collected on the River Zeta<br />

amounts to 486. Eight species are dominant (> 5% total abundance): Calopterix virgo<br />

(Linneus), C. splendens (Harris), Cordulegaster bidentatus (Sélys), Somatochlora<br />

metalica (Vander Linden), Libelulla depressa (Linnaeus), Gomphus vulgatisimus<br />

(Linneus), G. flavipes (Charpentier) and Onychogomphus forcipatus (Linneus). Six<br />

species are subdominant (abundance 5-2%): Lestes barbarus (Fabricius), Coenagrion<br />

ornatum (Sélys), C. hastulatum (Charpentier), C. puella (Linneus), Orthetrum anceps<br />

(Schneider), Sympetrum meridionale (Sélys) and S. striolatum (Charpentier). The<br />

remaning 12 species have abundance less than


80<br />

Natura Montenegrina, 6/2007<br />

Table 1. Abundance of the collected species. D = dominant (> 5% total abundance), SD =<br />

subdominant (2-5% total abundance), R = rare (< 2% total abundance).<br />

Species<br />

Number of<br />

collected<br />

specimens<br />

Relative<br />

abundance<br />

%<br />

Dominancy<br />

1. Calopterix virgo (Linneus, 1758) 46 9.46% D<br />

2. Calopteryx splendens (Harris, 1782) 34 6.99% D<br />

3. Lestes sponsa (Hensemann, 1823) 3 0.61% R<br />

4. Lestes dryas Kirby, 1890 2 0.41% R<br />

5. Lestes barbarus (Fabricius, 1798) 14 2.88% SD<br />

6. Platycnemis pennipes (Pallas, 1771) 4 0.82% R<br />

7. Ischnura elegans (Vander Linden, 1820) 8 1.64% R<br />

8. Ischnura pumilo (Charpentier, 1825) 9 1.85% R<br />

9. Coenagrion ornatum (Sélys, 1850) 24 4.93% SD<br />

10. Coenagrion hastulatum (Charpentier, 1840) 11 2.26% SD<br />

11. Coenagrion puella (Linneus, 1758) 13 2.67% SD<br />

12. Erythromma viridulum (Charpentier, 1840) 6 1.23% R<br />

13. Aeshna cyanea Müller, 1764 4 0.82% R<br />

14. Aeshna afinis Vander Linden, 1820 6 1.23% R<br />

15. Cordulegaster bidentatus (Sélys, 1843) 26 5.34% D<br />

16. Somatochlora metalica (Vander Linden,1825) 27 5.55% D<br />

17. Libelulla depressa (Linnaeus, 1758) 38 7.81% D<br />

18. Orthetrum cancellatum (Linnaeus, 1758) 8 1.64% R<br />

19. Orthetrum anceps (Schneider, 1845) 15 3.08% S<br />

20. Crocothemis erythraea (Brullé, 1823) 7 1.44% R<br />

21. Sympetrum flaveolum (Linnaeus, 1758) 6 1.23% R<br />

22. Sympetrum meridionale (Sélys, 1841) 17 3.49% SD<br />

23. Sympetrum striolatum (Charpentier, 1840) 20 4.11% SD<br />

24. Sympetrum sanquineum (Müller, 1764) 5 1.02% R<br />

25. Gomphus vulgatisimus (Linneus, 1758) 36 7.4% D<br />

26. Gomphus flavipes (Charpentier, 1825) 56 11.1% D<br />

27. Onychogomphus forcipatus (Linneus, 1758) 41 8.43% D<br />

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS: We are grateful to Branimir Gligorović and Igor Temelkovski<br />

for their logistic support.


81<br />

Gligorović & a l . A CONTRIBUTION TO THE KNOWLEDGE OF THE DRAGONFLIES . . .<br />

APPENDIX 1. Photographs of the collected species.<br />

FIGURE 2.<br />

Calopteryx virgo ♀<br />

FIGURE 3.<br />

Calopteryx virgo ♂<br />

FIGURE 4.<br />

Calopteryx splendens ♂<br />

FIGURE 5.<br />

Calopteryx splendens ♀<br />

FIGURE 6.<br />

Lestes sponsa (Hensemann) ♂<br />

FIGURE 7.<br />

Lestes dryas Kirby ♂


82<br />

Natura Montenegrina, 6/2007<br />

FIGURE 8.<br />

Lestes barbarus (Fabricius) ♀<br />

FIGURE 9.<br />

Platycnemis pennipes (Pallas) ♂,♀<br />

FIGURE 10.<br />

Ischnura elegans (Vander Linden) ♂<br />

FIGURE 11.<br />

Ischnura pumilo (Charpentier) ♂,♀<br />

FIGURE 12.<br />

Coenagrion ornatum (Sélys) juvenile ♀<br />

FIGURE 13.<br />

Coenagrion ornatum (Sélys) larvae


83<br />

Gligorović & a l . A CONTRIBUTION TO THE KNOWLEDGE OF THE DRAGONFLIES . . .<br />

FIGURE 14.<br />

Coenagrion puella (Linneus) juvenile ♀<br />

FIGURE 15.<br />

Coenagrion puella (Linneus) ♂<br />

FIGURE 16.<br />

Coenagrion hastulatum (Charpentier) ♂<br />

FIGURE 17.<br />

Erythromma viridulum (Charpentier) ♂<br />

FIGURE 18.<br />

Aeshna afinis Vander Linden ♂<br />

FIGURE 19.<br />

Aeshna afinis Vander Linden ♀


84<br />

Natura Montenegrina, 6/2007<br />

FIGURE 20.<br />

Aeshna afinis Vander Linden larvae<br />

FIGURE 21.<br />

Aeshna cyanea larvae<br />

FIGURE 22.<br />

Aeshna cyanea ♂<br />

FIGURE 23.<br />

Aeshna cyanea ♀<br />

FIGURE 24.<br />

Orthetrum anceps (Schneider) ♀<br />

FIGURE 25.<br />

Orthetrum cancellatum (Linnaeus) ♀


85<br />

Gligorović & a l . A CONTRIBUTION TO THE KNOWLEDGE OF THE DRAGONFLIES . . .<br />

FIGURE 26.<br />

Crocothemis erythraea (Brullé) ♂<br />

FIGURE 27.<br />

Sympetrum meridionale (Sélys) ♀<br />

FIGURE 28.<br />

Libelulla depressa (Linnaeus) ♂<br />

FIGURE 29.<br />

Libelulla depressa (Linnaeus) ♀<br />

FIGURE 30.<br />

Sympetrum flaveolum (Linnaeus) ♀<br />

FIGURE 31.<br />

Sympetrum striolatum (Charpentier) ♂


86<br />

Natura Montenegrina, 6/2007<br />

FIGURE 32.<br />

Sympetrum sanquineum (Müller) ♂, ♀<br />

FIGURE 33.<br />

Cordulegaster bidentatus (Sélys) ♂<br />

FIGURE 34. Somatohlora<br />

metalica ♀ and ♂<br />

FIGURE 35.<br />

Gomphus vulgatissimus (Linnaeus) ♀<br />

FIGURE 36.<br />

Gomphus vulgatissimus (Linnaeus) ♂


87<br />

Gligorović & a l . A CONTRIBUTION TO THE KNOWLEDGE OF THE DRAGONFLIES . . .<br />

FIGURE 37.<br />

Onychogomphus forcipatus ♀<br />

FIGURE 38.<br />

Gomphus flavipes (Charpentier) ♂<br />

APPENDIX 2. Photographs of the sampling sites.<br />

FIGURE 39. The River Zeta – Studenci<br />

FIGURE 40. The River Zeta – Martinići<br />

FIGURE 41. The River Zeta – Danilovgrad<br />

FIGURE 42. The River Zeta – Slap Zete


88<br />

Natura Montenegrina, 6/2007<br />

FIGURE 43. The River Zeta – Dobro Polje<br />

FIGURE 44. The River Zeta – Tunjevo<br />

FIGURE 45. The River Zeta – Glava Zete<br />

FIGURE 46. The River Zeta – Vidrovan<br />

REFERENCES<br />

Adamović , Ž. 1949 : La liste des Odonates du Museum d'historie naturelle du Pays<br />

Serbe. - Glasnik Prirodnjačkog <strong>muzej</strong>a srpske zemlje, Beograd, 1–2: 275– 293.<br />

Adamović , Ž. 1996: Odonata taken and observed in Donji Ceklin, Montenegro. -<br />

Acta Entomologica Serbica, 1(1/2): 39-48.<br />

Adamović , Ž., Anđ us, Lj. & Mihajlović , L j . 1996: Odonata (Insecta) in:<br />

K a r a m a n , G. (Ed.). The Fauna of Durmitor. - The Montenegrin Academy of<br />

Sciences and Arts, 5, 43 – 80, Podgorica.<br />

B ă n ă r e s c u P. M. 1992: Zoogeography of Freshwaters. Vol. 2. Distribution and<br />

Dispersal of Freshwater Animals in North America and Eurasia. - AULA-Verlag,<br />

Wiesbaden, 517–1091.<br />

B e s c h o v s k i , V. 1994: Fauna Bulgarica. 23 Insecta, Odonata. - Bulg. Acad. Sci.,<br />

Sofia. 372pp.


89<br />

Gligorović & a l . A CONTRIBUTION TO THE KNOWLEDGE OF THE DRAGONFLIES . . .<br />

Martinović -Vitanović V. & Kalafatić V. 1995: Basic Hydrogeological<br />

Characteristics of Yugoslavian Freshwaters. In S t e v a n o v i ć V & V a s i ć V.<br />

(eds), Biodiverzitet Jugoslavije. - Ecolibri, Biološki Fakultet, Beograd, 97–115 (in<br />

Serbian).<br />

Received: 22.11.2007


90<br />

Natura Montenegrina, 6/2007


NATURA MONTENEGRINA, PODGORICA, 6:91-100<br />

PRELIMINARY INVESTIGATIONS OF ORTHOPTEROID FAUNA OF<br />

THE ĆEMOVSKO POLJE, SEMI-DESERT FIELD NEAR PODGORICA, MONTENEGRO<br />

Jelena N I K Č EVIĆ 1)<br />

1)<br />

Institute for the Protection of Nature of Montenegro, 81000 Podgorica, Trg Bećir bega Osmanagića 16,<br />

Montenegro, E-mail: jnikcevic@cg.yu<br />

Key words:<br />

fauna,<br />

orthoptera,<br />

Ćemovsko polje field,<br />

semi-desert,<br />

ecological<br />

characteristics<br />

SYNOPSIS<br />

Orthopteroid fauna of Ćemovsko polje, a semi-desert<br />

field in Montenegro, is unknown and insufficiently studied.<br />

Owing to the investigations in period 2006-2007 in the area<br />

of Ćemovsko polje 37 species were determined and grouped<br />

in 4 superorders, 2 orders, 8 families and 27 genera. Data<br />

about ecological chara-cteristics, distribution, zoogeography<br />

and type of endemism for each species are presented.<br />

Ključne reči:<br />

fauna,<br />

pravokrilci,<br />

Ćemovsko polje,<br />

polupustinja,<br />

ekološke karakteristike<br />

SINOPSIS<br />

PRELIMINARNA ISTRAŽIVANJA FAUNE<br />

ORTOPTEROIDNIH INSEKATA POLUPUSTINJSKOG PODRUČJA<br />

ĆEMOVSKOG POLJA, CRNA GORA<br />

Fauna ortoptera Ćemovskog polja u Crnoj Gori je<br />

nepoznata i neistražena. Zahvaljujući istraživanjima u<br />

periodu 2006-2007. godine na prostoru Ćemovskog polja<br />

determinisano je 37 vrsta svrstanih u 4 nadreda, 2 reda, 8<br />

familija i 27 rodova. U radu su takodje dati podaci o<br />

distribuciji prisutnih vrsta, zoogeografskoj pripadnosti, tipu<br />

endemizma i ekološkim karakteristikama.<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

Throughout southern Europe, 14000 years ago the predominant picture was of<br />

an arid, semi-desert like steppe perhaps similar to the cool and arid mountain steppes<br />

found today in the Pamirs of southern Russia. A rapid warming and moistening of<br />

climate all across Europe occurred shortly before this time, with insect communities in


92<br />

Natura Montenegrina, 6/2007<br />

NW Europe suggesting conditions as warm as or warmer than the present-day for<br />

about the first 500 14C years (Atkinson et al. 1987). That sudden event was the basis<br />

for today’s picture of orthopteroid fauna and their evolution.<br />

The suddenness of this warming left ecosystems out of equilibrium. Trees had<br />

not yet had time to spread back over Europe, and a steppe cover predominated. The<br />

ice sheets in the north began to melt, but that had lasted for thousand years less than<br />

in the normal warm climate period. Some open woodland cover appeared in western<br />

Russia quite rapidly – within a few hundred years - after the initial warming events and<br />

woodland cover began increasing in the mountainous areas of southern Europe where<br />

trees had survived the glaciations.<br />

Data for orthoipteroid insects from region of Ćemovsko polje, a semi-desert<br />

field near Podgorica, Montenegro, are unknown in the literature. In course of<br />

investigation in period 2006-2007 of the orthopteroid fauna of this field, the detailed<br />

data about ecological characteristics and distribution in the semi-desert condition<br />

were established.<br />

MATERIAL AND METHODS<br />

Material was collected during 2006/2007. Depending of differences in the<br />

taxonomic group sampling was realised by application of different methods (collecting<br />

with mowing and method with individual catching). Collected material was identified by<br />

using keys: H a r z , K. (1969): The Orthoptera of Europe. Vol. I. The Hague; H a r z , K.<br />

(1975): The Orthoptera of Europe. Vol. II. The Hague; H a r z , K., K a l t e nbach, A.<br />

(1976): The Orthoptera of Europe. Vol. III. The Hague; U s , P. (1992): Favna<br />

Ortopteroidnih insektov Slovenije, Slovenska Akademija Znanosti in Umetnosti,<br />

Razred za prirodoslovne nauke, Biološki Institut Jovana Hadžija, br. 12., Ljubljana.<br />

INVESTIGATED AREA<br />

The Ćemovsko semi-desert field is the part of Zeta valey in Montenegro. It is<br />

situated southeast of the capital town of Montenegro – Podgorica, between the two<br />

rivers Morača and Cijevna. The soil subastrate of this field is made of fluvioglacial<br />

sand. In the field there are hills: Ljubović (112m), Zelenika (166m) and Srpska Gora<br />

(95m). The climate is modified Mediterranean one. The greater part of the filed is used<br />

for human activities. Some parts of the field, nearer to Podgorica, are under the<br />

great antropogenic influences.


93<br />

Nikčević: PRELIMINARY INVESTIGATIONS OF ORTHOPTEROID FAUNA OF THE ĆEMOVSKO POLJE . . .<br />

Picture 1. Ćemovsko field (photo:J. Nikčević)<br />

Biogegrafic charactetistics of vegetation:<br />

This type of semi-desert habitats biogeograficaly belongs to Mediterranean<br />

semi-desert province (Š i m i ć , 1987 in L a k u š i ć , R.) with discontinueted areal from<br />

northwest Africa and Pirinei peninsula in the West, to Iran and Irak to the East. This<br />

type of geological soil, climate features and ecological factors are basic for xeroterm<br />

vegetation of semi-desert type. According to Černjavski (1949) this type of vegetation<br />

communities is predominated by Satureia subspicata-Poa bulbosa which spread all<br />

over the field.<br />

RESULTS<br />

The results of the investigations from 2006 and 200. at Ćemovsko polje field are<br />

presented on the Table 1. with remarks on distribution, endemic and ecological<br />

characteristics. In accordance to these investigations 37 species belonging to 27<br />

genera classified into 4 superordo, 2 ordo and 7 families of Orthopteroidea have been<br />

determined.


94<br />

Natura Montenegrina, 6/2007<br />

Table1: The preliminary list of orthopteroid fauna at the semi-desert field Ćemovsko<br />

polje, with remarks on distribution, endemic and ecological characteristics.<br />

EU: European, M: Mediterranean, MS: Mediterranean-submediterranean, OM:<br />

oromediterranean-mediterranean, TM: tropic-mediterranean, TPM: tropicpontomediterranean<br />

PM: pontomediterranean, E: endemic characteristics, EC: ecological characteristics<br />

EU M MS OM TM TPM PM E EC<br />

MANTODEA<br />

Mantidae<br />

1.Mantis religiosa<br />

Linneus, 1758<br />

Empusidae<br />

2.Empusa fasciata -<br />

Brulle 1836<br />

GRYLLOPTERA<br />

TETTIGONIOIDEA<br />

Tetigonidae<br />

3.Leptophyes<br />

punctatissima<br />

(Bosc, 1792)<br />

4.Phaneroptera<br />

nana<br />

Fieber, 1853<br />

5.Tylopsis liliifolia<br />

(Fabricius, 1973)<br />

6.Saga pedo<br />

(Pallas, 1771)<br />

7.Eupholidoptera<br />

chabrieri schmidti<br />

(Charpentier, 1825)<br />

8.Metrioptera<br />

ambitiosa<br />

Uvarov, 1923<br />

9.Metrioptera<br />

oblongicollis<br />

(Bruner, 1882)<br />

10.Pholidoptera<br />

dalmatica<br />

(Krauss, 1878)<br />

11.Pholidoptera<br />

littoralis<br />

(Fiaber, 1853)<br />

12.Pholidoptera<br />

maritima<br />

Zeuner, 1931<br />

13.Rhacocleis<br />

germanica (Herrich +<br />

+ phitophil, thermophil<br />

+ thermophil<br />

+ thermophil<br />

phytophil<br />

silvicol<br />

+ thermophil<br />

arbusticol<br />

arboricol<br />

+ thermophil<br />

graminicol<br />

arbusticol<br />

+ praticol<br />

graminicolarbusticol<br />

pratinicol<br />

thermophil<br />

+ mediterran/<br />

submediterran<br />

silvicol, terricol<br />

arbusticol<br />

thermophil<br />

+ Balcan praticol higrophil<br />

phitophil<br />

+ Balcan praticol xeromesophil<br />

phitophil<br />

+ mediterran thermophil,<br />

xerophil,<br />

graminicol<br />

+ mediterran silvicol arbusticol<br />

thermophil<br />

+ thermophil<br />

xerophil<br />

graminicol<br />

thermophil


95<br />

Nikčević: PRELIMINARY INVESTIGATIONS OF ORTHOPTEROID FAUNA OF THE ĆEMOVSKO POLJE . . .<br />

Schaeffer, 1840)<br />

14.Ephgippiger<br />

ephippiger<br />

(Fiebig, 1784)<br />

GRYLLODEA<br />

Gryllidae<br />

15.Oecanthus<br />

pellucens<br />

(Scopoli) 1763<br />

Gryllotalpidae<br />

16.Gryllotalpa<br />

gryllotalpa<br />

(Linneus, 1758)<br />

ORTHOPTERA<br />

TETRIGODEA<br />

Tetrigidae<br />

17.Depressotetrix<br />

depressus<br />

Brisout, 1848<br />

ACRIDOIDEA<br />

Catantopidae<br />

18.Pezottetix<br />

giornae<br />

(Rossi, 1794)<br />

19.Anacridium<br />

aegyptum<br />

(Linneus 1764)<br />

20.Schistocerca<br />

gregaria<br />

(Forskal, 1775)<br />

21.Calliptamus<br />

italicus<br />

(Linneus 1758)<br />

Acrididae<br />

22.Acrida turrita<br />

(Linnaeus, 1758)<br />

23.Acrida ungarica<br />

ssp. mediterranea<br />

(Herbst 1786)<br />

24.Acrotylus<br />

insubricus<br />

(Scopoli, 1786)?<br />

25.Acrotylus<br />

longipes<br />

(Charpentier,1845)<br />

+ pratinicol silvicol<br />

arbusticol<br />

+ silvicol herbicol<br />

arboricol<br />

+ geobiont<br />

higrophil mesophil<br />

+ xerophil<br />

+ thermophil<br />

pratinicol<br />

terricol<br />

herbicol<br />

+ arbusticolarboricol<br />

+ arbusticol<br />

arboricol<br />

+ thermophil,<br />

pratinicol<br />

tericol<br />

herbicol xerophil<br />

+ thermophil<br />

pratinicol<br />

graminicol<br />

+ thermophil<br />

hygrophil<br />

pratinicol<br />

graminicol<br />

+ pratinicol<br />

termophil<br />

tericol,<br />

psamophil<br />

xerophil<br />

+ Pratinicol<br />

Termophil<br />

tericol, psamophil,<br />

xerophil


96<br />

Natura Montenegrina, 6/2007<br />

26.Acrotylus<br />

patruelis (Herrisch-<br />

Schaeffer, 1838)<br />

27.Aiolopus<br />

strepens<br />

(Latreille) 1804<br />

28.Aiolopus<br />

thalassinum<br />

(Fabricius 1781)<br />

29.Oedipoda<br />

coerulescens<br />

(Linnaeus, 1758)<br />

30.Oedipoda<br />

germanica<br />

(Latreille, 1804)<br />

31.Oedipoda<br />

miniata<br />

(Pallas, 1771)<br />

32.Psophus<br />

stridulus<br />

(Linne, 1758)<br />

33.Sphingonotus<br />

coerulans<br />

(Linneus, 1767)<br />

34.Aeropus<br />

sibiricus<br />

(Linneus) 1767<br />

35.Dociostaurus<br />

genei<br />

(Ocskay) 1832<br />

36.Dociostaurus<br />

marrocanus<br />

(Thunberg 1815)<br />

37.Omocestus<br />

rufipes<br />

(Zetterstedt, 1821)<br />

+ pratinicol,<br />

thermophil, terricol,<br />

psamophil, xserophil<br />

+ thermophil,<br />

pratinicol,<br />

geophil,<br />

phitophilmesophil<br />

+ thermophil, pratinicol,<br />

geophilphitophil,<br />

higrophil<br />

+ pratinicolterricol,<br />

xerophil<br />

+ pratinicolterricol,<br />

litophil, xerophil<br />

+ xerophil, thermophil<br />

+ thermophil, pratinicol,<br />

terricol<br />

xerophil<br />

+ terricol,<br />

psamophil,xerophil<br />

+ hygrophilstenotherm,<br />

thermophob<br />

+ thermophil, pratinicol<br />

+ thermophil, pratinicol,<br />

geophilphitophil<br />

+ xerophil<br />

DISCUSSION<br />

Discussion in this chapter is about diversity and connections among the<br />

orthopteroid insects within different taxonomic groups. The zoogeographic<br />

characteristics of species are also presented, with remarks on endemic species.<br />

MANTODEA<br />

Fam- Mantidae - 1 species<br />

Mantis religiosa<br />

Fam. Empusidae – 1 species<br />

Empusa fasciata


97<br />

Nikčević: PRELIMINARY INVESTIGATIONS OF ORTHOPTEROID FAUNA OF THE ĆEMOVSKO POLJE . . .<br />

TETTIGONIOIDEA<br />

Fam. Tettigonidae – 12 species<br />

Leptophyes punctatissima, Phaneroptera nana, Tylopsis liliifolia, Saga pedo,<br />

Eupholidoptera chabrieri schmidti, Metrioptera ambitiosa, Metrioptera oblongicollis,<br />

Pholidoptera dalmatica, Pholidoptera littoralis, Pholidoptera maritima, Rhacocleis<br />

germanica , Ephgippiger ephippiger<br />

Fam. Gryllidae - 2 species<br />

Oecanthus pellucens, Gryllotalpa gryllotalpa<br />

TETRIGODEA<br />

Fam. Tetrigidae - 1 species<br />

Depressotetrix depressus<br />

ACRIDOIDEA<br />

Fam. Catantopidae - 4 species<br />

Pezottetix giornae, Anacridium aegyptum, Schistocerca gregaria, Calliptamus italicus<br />

Fam Acrididae – 16 species<br />

Acrida turrita, Acrida ungarica ssp. mediterranea, Acrotylus insubricus, Acrotylus<br />

longipes, Acrotylus patruelis, Aiolopus strepens, Aiolopus thalassinum, Oedipoda<br />

coerulescens, Oedipoda germanica, Oedipoda miniata, Psophus stridulus,<br />

Sphingonotus coerulans, Aeropus sibiricus, Dociostaurus genei, Dociostaurus<br />

marrocanu, Omocestus rufipes<br />

The largest diversity of species belongs to family Acrididae (16), after which there<br />

follow the diversity of family Tettigonidae (12). The other types of species belong to<br />

families with smaller diversity (Catantopidae 4, Gryllidae 2, and families Mantidae,<br />

Empusidae and Tetrigidae with 1 species).<br />

Zoogeographic analysis of faunistic elements:<br />

European species: 13<br />

Mantis religiosa, Leptophyes punctatissima, Saga pedo, Rhacocleis germanica,<br />

Gryllotalpa gryllotalpa, Pezottetix giornae, Aiolopus strepens, Aiolopus thalassinu,<br />

Oedipoda coerulescens, Oedipoda germanica, Psophus stridulus, Aeropus sibiricus,<br />

Omocestus rufipes<br />

Mediterranean species: 2<br />

Pholidoptera dalmatica, Pholidoptera littoralis<br />

Mediterranean – submediterranean species: 11<br />

Empusa fasciata, Tylopsis liliifolia, Eupholidoptera chabrieri schmidti, Metrioptera<br />

ambitiosa, Metrioptera oblongicollis, Pholidoptera maritima, Oecanthus pellucens,<br />

Depressotetrix depressus, Calliptamus italicus, Dociostaurus genei, Dociostaurus<br />

marrocanus


98<br />

Natura Montenegrina, 6/2007<br />

Picture 4. Ćemovsko field (photo:J. Nikčević)<br />

Oromediterranean-mediterranean species: - no data<br />

Tropic-mediterranean species: 2<br />

Acrotylus patruelis, Sphingonotus coerulans<br />

Tropicpontomediterranean species: 5<br />

Anacridium aegyptum, Schistocerca gregaria, Acrida turrita, Acrida ungarica ssp.<br />

mediterranea, Acrotylus insubricus<br />

Pontomediterranean species: 4<br />

Phaneroptera nana, Ephgippiger ephippiger, Acrotylus longipes, Oedipoda miniata<br />

Endemic species: 5<br />

Balcan endemic species: 2<br />

Metrioptera ambitiosa , Metrioptera oblongicollis<br />

Mediterranean endemic species: 2<br />

Pholidoptera dalmatica , Pholidoptera littoralis<br />

Mediteranean-submediterranean species: 1<br />

Eupholidoptera chabrieri schmidti


99<br />

Nikčević: PRELIMINARY INVESTIGATIONS OF ORTHOPTEROID FAUNA OF THE ĆEMOVSKO POLJE . . .<br />

The greatest number of species (13) belongs to European type of distribution,<br />

followed by 11 species of Mediterranean-submediterranean distribution. Five species<br />

belongs to tropic-pontomediterranean zoogeographic distribution and four species to<br />

pontomediterranean species. The lowest number (2) of species are those with<br />

mediterranean and tropic-mediterranean type of distribution. There are no available<br />

data for oromediterranean-mediterranean species distribution.<br />

There are 5 endemic species with Balkan endemic type and 2 species with<br />

Mediterranean endemic type and 1 species of Mediterranean-submediterranean type<br />

of endemism.<br />

In this discussion we can see that the greatest number of species have<br />

thermophil, xerophil, graminicol ecological characteristics.<br />

CONCLUSIONS<br />

During the investigation of ortopteroid insects 37 species belonging to 27 genera<br />

classified into 4 superordo, 2 ordo and 7 families were determined from collected<br />

material. The largest diversity of species belongs to family Acrididae (16), followed by<br />

the diversity of family Tettigonidae (12). The other types of species belong to families<br />

with smaller diversity (Catantopidae 4, Gryllidae 2, and families Mantidae, Empusidae<br />

and Tetrigidae with 1 species).<br />

The greatest number of species (13) belongs to European type of distribution,<br />

then follow 11 species of mediterranean-submediterranean distribution. Five species<br />

belong to tropic-pontomediterranean zoogeographic distribution, 4 species to<br />

pontomediterranean ones. The lowest number (2) of species belongs to species with<br />

mediterranean and tropic-mediterranean type of distribution. For oromediterraneanmediterranean<br />

species there are no data so far.<br />

We can see that the greatest number of species have thermophil, xerophil,<br />

graminicol ecological characteristics in every type of taxonomical belonging.<br />

In Ćemovsko polje filed, according to this investigation (in literature there are no<br />

data about orthopteroid fauna on that field), the diversity of orthopteroid fauna is<br />

relatively small owing to a low diversity of vegetation cover, but abounding in relict<br />

and endemic species and species with low number specimens. Last characteristic is<br />

present in some rare taxa. This „small number“of orthopteroid insects has an origin in<br />

still insufficiently studied conditions in the history of orthopteroid evolution for that<br />

area. Some species and some habitats were on the same place at the same time with<br />

different ecological characteristics. Vegetation communities were displaced from one<br />

type to the other, opposite to the natural way of evolution of origin and succession.<br />

REFERENCES<br />

A D A M S , J.: Environmental Sciences Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak<br />

Ridge, TN 37831, USA<br />

Č E J C H A N, A. 1984: Catalogue of the Orthopteroid Insects of Montenegro - Acta<br />

faunistica entomologica musei nationalis Pragae sv. XVII: 9-22, Pragae.


100<br />

Natura Montenegrina, 6/2007<br />

Č ERNJAVSKI, P., GREBENŠČ IKOV, O. & PAVLOVIĆ , Z. 1949: O flori i<br />

vegetaciji Skadarskog područja. - Glasn. Prir. Muz. Srpske Zemlje, Ser. B, Biol.<br />

Nauke 1-2: 4-91. Beograd.<br />

H A R Z, K. 1969: The Orthoptera of Europe. Vol. I. The Hague.<br />

H A R Z, K. 1975: The Orthoptera of Europe. Vol. II. The Hague<br />

H A R Z, K., KALTENBACH, A. 1976: The Orthoptera of Europe. Vol. III. The Hague.<br />

I N G R I S C H, S., KÖEHLER, G. 1998: Die Heuschrecken Mitteleuropas, Die Neue<br />

Brehm-Bucherei Bd.629: 27-41, Westarp Wissenchaften - Magdeburg.<br />

ŠIMIĆ , S. 1987: Syrphidae (Insecta, Diptera), Biogeografska i ekološka analiza<br />

faune osolikih muva Durmitora sa osvrtom na faunu osolikih muva <strong>Crne</strong> <strong>Gore</strong>,<br />

Fauna Durmitora Sv. 2., CANU, Posebna izdanja, knj. 21, Odeljenje prirodnih<br />

nauka, knj. 13: 11-154, Titograd.<br />

U S , P. (1992): Favna Ortopteroidnih insektov Slovenije, Slovenska Akademija<br />

Znanosti in Umetnosti, Razred za prirodoslovne nauke, Dela 32, Biološki institut<br />

Jovana Hadžija, 12:61-285.<br />

Received: 25.10.2007.


NATURA MONTENEGRINA, PODGORICA, 6:101-109<br />

MORPHOLOGICAL TRAITS OF COMMON TOAD Bufo bufo (Bufonidae) FROM<br />

BIOGRADSKO LAKE<br />

Natalija Č A Đ ENOVIĆ ¹, Tanja V U K O V ²<br />

¹ Natural History Museum of Montenegro, Podgorica, Crna Gora, E-mail: lazo@cg.yu<br />

² Institute for Biological Research “Siniša Stanković”, Beograd, Srbija<br />

Key words:<br />

Bufo bufo,<br />

morphometric,<br />

qualitative characters,<br />

differences between<br />

the sexes.<br />

SYNOPSIS<br />

In this paper we have presented the results of the<br />

analysis of morphological traits of Common Toad Bufo bufo<br />

population, from Biogradsko Lake. On the samples taken<br />

from this locality univariant and multivariant statistical<br />

analyses have been performed. A large number of<br />

morphometric and qualitative characters have been done for<br />

the first time. For morphometric characters basic parameters<br />

of descriptive statistics have been calculated, and for<br />

qualitative characters three qualitative traits with three<br />

conditions at four body regions of Common Toad separately<br />

by sexes, have been treated. As for the morphometric<br />

characters it has been established that there is a significant<br />

statistical difference between the sexes.<br />

Ključne riječi:<br />

Bufo bufo,<br />

morfometrijski,<br />

kvalitativni karakteri,<br />

razlike među<br />

polovima.<br />

SINOPSIS<br />

MORFOLOŠKE KARAKTERISTIKE OBIČNE KRASTAVE ŽABE<br />

BUFO BUFO (BUFONIDAE) SA BIOGRADSKOG JEZERA<br />

U ovom radu su prikazani rezultati analize morfoloških<br />

odlika populacije krastave žabe Bufo bufo, sa Biogradskog<br />

jezera. Na uzorcima uzetim sa ovog lokaliteta urađene su<br />

univarijantne i multivarijantne statističke analize. Po prvi put<br />

je obrađen veliki broj morfometrijskih i kvalitativnih karaktera.<br />

Za morfometrijske karaktere izračunati su osnovni parametri<br />

deskriptivne statistike, a za kvalitativne karaktere obrađene<br />

su tri kvalitativne karakteristike sa tri stanja na četiri tjelesna<br />

regiona obične krastave žabe odvojeno po polovima. Što se<br />

tiče morfometrijskih karaktera utvrđena je statistički značajna<br />

razlika između polova.


102<br />

Natura Montenegrina, 6/2007<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

Common Toad has a large distribution and popultes mainly the entire palearctic<br />

area. It populates almost the entire Europe, with the exception of far north, Ireland,<br />

Corsika, Sardinia, Balear's Islands, Malta, Crete, as well as some smaller<br />

islands (B o r k i n and V e i t h , 1997). It also populates the northwestern Africa<br />

(P a s t e u r and B o n s , 1959). Although common at lower altitudes, it may also be<br />

found also on altitudes exceedeing 2500 m and on Iberian Peninsula (A n g e l , 1946;<br />

B o r k i n and V e i t h , 1997). In Montenegro it is mainly widely distributed. Owing to<br />

wide distribution, climatic conditions in various parts of areal of distribution are very<br />

different. Thus, in northern part of the areal the winters are long, cold and humid, so<br />

that the period favorable for growth is rather short (J o h a n n e s s e n , 1970). On<br />

higher altitudes the conditions are even more extreme. On the other hand, southern<br />

populations of this species are exposed to much more favorable conditions of outer<br />

environment; therefore the period favorable for growth is much longer.<br />

Species Bufo bufo is a polytypic one. From the scope of this species a taxon<br />

from the Far East has been separated on the level of species Bufo gargarizans<br />

(A n a n j e v a et al. 1998, K u z m i n 1999a, 1999b), and the character of polytype is<br />

determined to it in addition to nominotype subspecies three other ones B. b.<br />

grediscola, B. b. verrucosissimus, B. b. spinosus. If we recognize the fact that<br />

Caucasus Toad (Bufo verrucosissimus) is a separate species (e.g. O r l o v a &<br />

T u n i y e v 1989, A n a n j e v a et al. 1998), than the taxonomic differentiation in scope<br />

of Common Toad is even more limited. Nominotype subspecies is the most widely<br />

distributed (Northern and Southern Europe). The two first subspecies have a limited<br />

geographical area (mountains Gredos and Caucasus), nominotype subspecies is the<br />

most widely distributed (Northern and Central Europe), whereas the areal of<br />

subspecies B. b. spinosus is limited to the region of Mediterranean (northwestern<br />

parts of Africa, southeast Europe, southern Switzerland, Italy as well as the southern<br />

parts of France and Spain).<br />

MATERIAL AND METHODS<br />

A total of 41 specimens has been analyzed, 26 males and 15 females. The<br />

largest part of the material has been collected in mating period. The material has<br />

mainly been manually collected and meredov (a net with a handle) has also been<br />

used.<br />

The samples belong to herpetological collection of the Natural History Museum<br />

of Montenegro; they are kept in 70 % alcohole.<br />

Morphometric analysis has been done on 21 traits which determine size and<br />

form of body and head of tailless amphibians. Measured traits are: L – longthe of body


103<br />

Čađenović & Vukov: MORPHOLOGICAL TRAITS OF COMMON TOAD BUFO BUFO . . .<br />

from the top of head to the opening of the cloaca; Lpa – length of front exstremity; F –<br />

length of femur measured fromxthe opening of cloaca to knee joint; T – lengthj of<br />

tibiofibula from knee joint to tibiotarsal joint; P – distance from tibiotarsal joint to the<br />

tip of the longest finger (IV); n – length of metatarsus from the internal metatarsal<br />

ridgelet to the tip of the longest finger (IV); DpPa – length of the first finger off front<br />

exstremity; DpPp – length of the first finger of back extremity; Cint – the biggest<br />

length of the internal metatarsal ridgelet; Lc – length of head from the top of head to<br />

jaw joint; Ltc – width of head measured between the jaw joints; Spp – betweeneyes<br />

space between the internal edges of eye lids; Lc – lengh of head from the top of head<br />

to jaw joint; Ltc – width of head measured between jaw joints; Spp – betweeneyes<br />

space between the internal edges of eye lids; Spi – distance betwnn the outer nasal<br />

openings; Spcr – distance between front angles of eye openings; Lo – the largest<br />

length of eyeball; Ltp – the largest width of upper eye lid; Dro – distance from the top<br />

of head to the eye edge; Dno- distance of nasal opening from eye; Lh - length of<br />

cutaneous folds on heels; Lg - length of partoid salivary glands; Wg - width of<br />

salivary glands and weight.<br />

Three qualitative traits (Table 1) with three conditions on four body regions of<br />

toad: head part - dorsal side, dorsal part-dorsal side, head part -ventral side,<br />

abdominal part-ventral side.<br />

The conditions of qualitative traits have been coded in the following manner:<br />

Dorsal side – head part:<br />

1a - round warts, 1b - oval warts, 1c – kidneylike warts; 2a – very protuberant<br />

warts, 2b – protuberant warts, 2c – drawn in warts; 3a – very marked thornlike ends of<br />

warts; 3b – medium marked thornlike ends of warts; 3c – weakly marked thornlike<br />

ends of warts;<br />

Dorsal side - dorsal part:<br />

4a - round warts, 4b - oval warts, 4c - kidneylike warts; 5a – very protuberant<br />

warts, 5b – protuberant warts, 5c – drawn in warts; 6a – very marked thornlike ends of<br />

warts; 6b – medium marked thornlike ends of warts; 6c – weakly marked thornlike<br />

ends of warts;<br />

Ventral side – head part:<br />

7a - round warts, 7b - oval warts, 7c - kidneylike warts; 8a – very protuberant<br />

warts, 8b – protuberant warts, 8c – drawn in warts; 9a – very marked thornlike ends of<br />

warts; 9b – medium marked thornlike ends of warts; 9c – weakly marked thornlike<br />

ends of warts;


104<br />

Natura Montenegrina, 6/2007<br />

Ventral side – abdominal part:<br />

10a - round warts, 10b - oval warts, 10c - kidneylike warts; 11a – very<br />

protuberant warts, 11b – protuberant warts, 11c – drawn in warts; 12a – very marked<br />

thornlike ends of warts; 12b – medium marked thornlike ends of warts; 12c – weakly<br />

marked thornlike ends of warts;<br />

Trait<br />

Warts shape<br />

Condition<br />

a) round<br />

b) oval<br />

c) reniform<br />

a)very convex<br />

Warts convexity<br />

b) convex<br />

c) inverted<br />

Prominence of thornlike<br />

warts endings<br />

a)very prominent<br />

b)averagely prominent<br />

c)weakly prominent<br />

Table 1. Analysed qualitatie traits in Bufo bufo<br />

Statistical Analysis<br />

Programme package STATISTICA (version 5.0) has been used for statistical<br />

analysis of data. For morphometric characters basic parameters of descriptive<br />

statistics have been separately calculated by genders: medium value ( x ), error of<br />

medium value (SE), standard deviation (SD), minimal (min) and maximal (max) values<br />

traits as well as coeficient of variation (CV). Analysis of sexual dimorphism has been<br />

performed on basic data (untransformed measures for every property), as well as on<br />

standardized residuals on eight traits (L, Lpa, F, T, P, n, Lc, Ltc). Regression of every<br />

property on body length (L) and use of standardized residuals from such a regression<br />

provides for the elimination of the impact of body size. Comparison of differences<br />

between the genders on basic data and on standardised residuals has been performed<br />

by the use of Tukey Test for the samples of uneven size.<br />

For the establishment of the significance of differences in respect of<br />

morphometric characters between the genders analysis of variance (ANOVA) has<br />

been used.<br />

Absolute and relative frequences (%) of the conditions of qualitative traits have<br />

been established. Qualitative traits have been analysed also through the<br />

corresponding analyses.


105<br />

Čađenović & Vukov: MORPHOLOGICAL TRAITS OF COMMON TOAD BUFO BUFO . . .<br />

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION<br />

Morphometric Characters<br />

Former data on values of morphometric characters of the species Bufo bufo are<br />

rather insufficient, or, some of them have been given only descriptively. That is why<br />

we have presented here the average values for a large number of characters that<br />

have not been previously analyzed and data about that do not exist in the literature.<br />

Basic parameters of morphometric characters descriptive statistics have been<br />

presented separately by sexes in the table 2. The smallest male of the sample of the<br />

population from Biogradsko Lake is 64.28, and the largest one 82.54 mm. The<br />

smallest female is 90.94 mm, and the largest 109.94 mm. Obtained values of body<br />

size of common toad from Biogradsko Lake are within the limits of the so far recorded<br />

values from other parts of areal of the species. (R a d o v a n o v i ć , 1951; A r n o l d and<br />

B u r t o n , 1978; Đ urović et al, 1979 etc).<br />

Sexual dimorphism has been analyzed in scope of population (localities) by<br />

application of Tukey test for samples of unequal size (“Unequal N HSD Tukey” test).<br />

This test has shown an expressed sexual dimorphism, where the females have higher<br />

average values of analyzed traits (Table 2). On basis of calculated parameters of<br />

descriptive statistics, separately by sexes and on basis of compared differences<br />

between the sexes, it has been established that the females have statistically higher<br />

values of all the characters, especially when the word is about L – body length, Lpa –<br />

length of front extremity, Lc – head length, Ltc – head width, Lg – length of salivary<br />

glands, weigth.<br />

With the population of Biogradsko Lake a great number of traits that have been<br />

demonstrating sexual dimorphism by the analysis of basic data where the size has<br />

been included, indicate the absence of sexual dimorphism for the largest number of<br />

characters when body size is excluded. The charactereistics which demonstrate the<br />

presence of sexual dimorphism also after the eliminating body size are T- length of<br />

tibiofibula and F – length of femur.<br />

Females are bigger than males in a large number of amphibian species<br />

(S h i n e , 1979; M i a u d et al., 1999; K h o n s u e et al.., 2001a, 2002b; M o n n e t and<br />

C h e r r y , 2002). That has been especially expressed with tailless amphibians in<br />

which females are bigger than males with 90% of species (S h i n e , 1979). This has<br />

also been established in this paper for studied population from Biogradsko Lake, as<br />

well as for the populations of the remaining part of the areal of distribution of this<br />

species (G i t t i n s et al., 1980; H e m e l a a r , 1988). The most common explanation of<br />

sexual dimorphism in body size is the advantge the females have in respect of eggs<br />

production (H a l l i d a y and V e r r e l l , 1986; C v e t k o v i ć et al., 2003). Namely,<br />

there is a positive correlation in many groups between body length and fecundity<br />

(C u m m i n s , 1986; B e r v e n , 1988; S i n s c h , 1998; G i b b o n s and M c C a r t h y ,<br />

1986). Assumption is that the selection, owing to a pointed correlation of body length


106<br />

Natura Montenegrina, 6/2007<br />

Males Females sexual dimorphism<br />

Unequal N HSD (Tukey)<br />

Trait N Means SD SE Min Max N Means SD SE Min Max basic data/standard results<br />

L 26 73.71 4.1447 0.8128 64.28 82.54 15 100.64 5.0865 1.3133 90.94 109.94 ***<br />

Lpa 26 54.62 3.6473 0.7153 46.68 63.17 15 71.64 3.7562 0.9699 62.23 77.60 ***/ns<br />

F 26 32.53 3.1809 0.6238 25.32 38.86 15 40.67 4.9746 1.2844 31.98 46.95 ***/***<br />

T 26 24.10 2.0556 0.4031 20.52 27.25 15 28.82 2.4023 0.6203 25.55 34.46 ***/**<br />

P 26 36.65 4.2990 0.8431 27.03 42.91 15 42.98 2.8349 0.7320 37.06 47.03 **/ns<br />

n 26 51.90 4.6742 0.9167 43.30 60.54 15 62.52 4.8611 1.2551 56.26 72.83 ***/ns<br />

n-P 26 15.25 4.0443 0.7931 7.26 22.45 15 19.54 4.4970 1.1611 12.24 27.70 **<br />

DpPa 26 6.58 0.7584 0.1487 5.10 7.99 15 10.44 1.5234 0.3933 7.48 13.45 ***<br />

DpPp 26 6.74 0.8867 0.1739 5.29 8.63 15 8.46 1.2908 0.3333 5.85 10.79 ***<br />

Cint 26 4.53 0.5892 0.1155 3.37 5.56 15 6.34 0.9030 0.2331 4.51 7.74 ***<br />

Lc 26 17.50 1.1857 0.2325 14.28 19.46 15 24.69 1.6894 0.4362 22.04 27.83 ***/ns<br />

Ltc 26 22.41 1.5435 0.3027 19.67 24.73 15 31.19 2.0888 0.5393 28.09 36.37 ***/ns<br />

Spp 26 8.75 0.9524 0.1868 6.72 10.92 15 12.55 1.6316 0.4213 9.75 15.07 ***<br />

Spi 26 4.03 0.5097 0.1000 2.85 4.92 15 5.32 0.6099 0.1575 4.39 6.47 ***<br />

Spcr 26 7.49 0.5751 0.1128 6.28 8.62 15 11.82 0.9789 0.2528 10.28 14.21 ***<br />

Lo 26 6.25 0.6112 0.1199 4.95 7.43 15 9.28 0.7010 0.1810 7.61 10.27 ***<br />

Ltp 26 5.88 0.6321 0.1240 4.32 6.71 15 7.80 0.8845 0.2284 5.72 9.61 ***<br />

Dro 26 7.54 0.5957 0.1168 6.27 8.75 15 10.72 0.8648 0.2233 9.42 12.33 ***<br />

Dno 26 3.22 0.3864 0.0758 2.59 4.08 15 4.49 0.5739 0.1482 3.54 5.41 ***<br />

Lh 26 3.56 0.5723 0.1122 2.65 4.77 15 5.09 0.3795 0.0980 4.49 5.81 ***<br />

Lg 26 14.86 1.7528 0.3438 11.78 18.10 15 20.77 2.2236 0.5741 17.04 24.34 ***<br />

Wg 26 5.80 0.7387 0.1449 4.53 7.50 15 8.20 1.0614 0.2741 6.48 10.06 ***<br />

Weight 26 44.50 6.4576 1.2664 33.00 56.00 15 141.07 31.1367 8.0395 97.00 230.00 ***<br />

Table 2. Basic parameters of descriptive statistics of males and females of Biogradsko Lake and Tukey (HSD) test with gender factor


107<br />

Čađenović & Vukov: MORPHOLOGICAL TRAITS OF COMMON TOAD BUFO BUFO . . .<br />

and fecundiy, favorises several values for body length of females. Greater eggs<br />

production on the other hand is explained by larger internal space for their storage,<br />

which larger females have (A n d e r s o n , 1994).<br />

The direction and magnitude of dimorphism in body length depend of various<br />

selective pressures the specimens of male and female sex are exposed to. D a r w i n<br />

(1871) assumed that sexual selection (though the competition among the specimens<br />

of the same sex or through an active selection of partner), may lead to sexual<br />

dimorphism. For instance, in species with pointed struggles among the males, males<br />

are frequently bigger than females.<br />

However, it is important to underline that common toad is one of rare secies in<br />

which males are a smaller sex, although there are struggles for females among them<br />

(H a l l i d a y and V e r r e l l , 1986; A r a k , 1988).<br />

Qualitative Analysis<br />

By a comparison of rerlative frequency of condition of monitored qualitative traits<br />

it has been noted that the same conditions, as a rule, have the greatest frequency<br />

both in the sample of males and in the sample of females (Tabele 3). The exception is<br />

the convexity of of warts in head region (in males the largest relative frequency have<br />

the warts which are indented, and with females warts are very protuberant) and the<br />

appearance of thornlike endings of ventral side of head region (most frequently weakly<br />

expressed in males and averagely expressed in females). The table of relative<br />

frequency of the conditions indicates that with females the variability of condition is<br />

higher than with males.<br />

By a correspondant analysis we have monitored the impact of qualitative traits<br />

on ordination of specimens of both sexes. The first corresponding axis has separated<br />

24.69% of variability, and the other one 17.03%. There is no clear sex separation<br />

(Figure 1). The sample of males indicates an uniformity in respect of monitored traits.<br />

Only one male has been separated during the second coresponding axis from the<br />

„main cloud” of male specimens on basis of two traits (11b and 12b) (Figure 2). One<br />

may observe a higher variability in scope of the sample of females. Traits 1c, 4b and<br />

5a separate two females along the first correspoding axis from other females, where it<br />

should be mentioned that these two traits as well as the traits 2a, 3b and 6b influence<br />

separating of females from males (Figures 1 and 2).<br />

The significance of this paper is in presenting for the first time the analysis of a<br />

larger number of morphometric and qualitative characters of population of the species<br />

Bufo bufo from Biogradsko Lake. These data make the grounds for further<br />

investigations of the populations of the species Bufo bufo both from Biogradsko Lake<br />

and the populations of this species from the territory of entire ontenegro.


108<br />

Natura Montenegrina, 6/2007<br />

LITERATURE<br />

ANANJEVA, N., BORKIN, L., DAREVSKIJ, I. & ORLOV, N. 1998: Zemnovodnie i<br />

presmikajuščiesja. - Enciklopedija prirodi Rosii. ABF, Moskva, pp. 574.<br />

ARNOLD, E.N., BURTON, J.A. 1978: A Field Guide to the Reptiles and Amphibians of<br />

Britain and Europe. – Collins, London<br />

ARAK, A. 1988: Sexual Dimorphism in Body Size: A Model and a Test. - Evolution 42:<br />

820-825.<br />

ANDERSON, S. 1994: Sexual Selection. - Princeton University Press, Princeton, New<br />

Jersey.<br />

BERVEN, K.A. 1988: Factors Affecting Variation in Reproductive Traits within a<br />

Population of Wood Frogs Rana sylvatica. - Copeia, 1988: 605-615.<br />

BORKIN, L.J., VEITH, M.1997: Bufo bufo (Linnaeus, 1758). In: GASC, J. P., GABELA,<br />

A., CRNOBRNJA-ISAILOVIĆ, J., DOLMEN, D.,GROSSENBACHER, K.,<br />

HAFFNER, P., LESCURE, J., MARTENS, H., MARTINEZ RICA, J.P., MAURIN,<br />

J., OLIVIERA, M.E., SOFIANIDOU, T.S., VEITH, M., ZUIDEREWIJK, A. (eds),<br />

1997. Atlas of Amphibians and Reptiles in Europe. Pp. 118-119. Societas<br />

Europaea Herpetologica & Muséum National d'Historie Naturelle (IEGB/SPN),<br />

Paris.<br />

CVETKOVIĆ, D., ALEKSIĆ, I., CRNOBRNJA – ISAILOVIĆ, J. 2003: Reproductive<br />

Traits in Common Toad Bufo bufo from the Vicinity of Belgrade. - Archives of<br />

Biological Sciences, Belgrade 55: 25P-26P.<br />

CUMMINS, C.P. 1986: Temporal and Spatial Variation in Egg size and Fecundity in<br />

Rana temporaria. - Journal of Animal Ecology 55: 303 – 316.<br />

DARWIN, C. 1871: The Descent of Man and Selection in Relation to Sex. – Murray,<br />

London.<br />

ĐUROVIĆ, E., VUKOVIĆ, T., POCRNJIĆ, Z. 1979: Vodozemci Bosne i Hercegovine. -<br />

Zemaljski <strong>muzej</strong> BiH, Sarajevo.<br />

GITTINS, S.P., PARKER, A.G., SLATER, F.M. 1980: Population Traits of the Common<br />

Toad (Bufo bufo) Visiting a Breeding Site in mid- Wales. - Journal of Animal<br />

Ecology, 49: 161-173.<br />

HALLIDAY, T.R., VERRELL, P.A. 1986: Sexual Selection and Body Size in<br />

Amphibians. - Herpetological Journal, 1: 86 – 92.<br />

HEMELAAR, A.S.M. 1988: Age, Growth and other Population Traits of Bufo bufo from<br />

Different Latitudes and Altitudes. - Journal of Herpetology, 22: 369-388.<br />

JOHANNESSEN, T.W. 1970: The Climate of Scandinavia. In: C. C. Wallen (ed), World<br />

KUZMIN, S.L. 1999a. Zemnovodnie bivšego SSSR. Tovariščestvo naučnih izdanij<br />

KMK, Moskva.<br />

KUZMIN, S.L. 1999b: The Amphibians of the former Soviet Union. Vol. I. - Pensoft,<br />

Sofia/Moscow.


109<br />

Čađenović & Vukov: MORPHOLOGICAL TRAITS OF COMMON TOAD BUFO BUFO . . .<br />

MIAUD, C., GUYETANT, R., ELMBERG, J. 1999: Variations in Life-history Traits in the<br />

Common Frog Rana temporaria (Amphibia: Anura): a Literature Review and New<br />

Data from the French Alps. - Journal of Zoology, 249: 61-73.<br />

MONNET, J. M., CHERRY, M. 2002: Sexual Size Dimorphism in Anurans. -<br />

Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B-Biological Sciences 269:<br />

2301 – 2307.<br />

ORLOVA, V.F. & TUNIYEV, B.S. 1989: On the Taxonomy of the Caucasian Common<br />

Toads Belonging to the Group Bufo bufo verrucosissimus (Pallas) (Amphibia,<br />

Anura, Bufonidae). - Biol. MOIP, Otd. biol., 94 (3): 13-24.<br />

PASTEUR, G. & BONS, J. (1959): Les Batraciens du Maroc. - Travaux de l'Institut<br />

Scientifique Cherifien, Serie Zoologique No 17, pp. 240. Rabat.<br />

RADOVANOVIĆ, M. 1951. Vodozemci i gmizavci naše zemlje. - Naučna knjiga,<br />

Beograd.<br />

SINSCH, U. 1998. Biologie und Okologie der Kreuzkrote (Bufo calamita). - Laurenti,<br />

Bochum.<br />

SHINE, R. 1979. Sexual Selection and Sexual Dimorphism in the Amphibia. – Copeia,<br />

2: 297 – 306.<br />

Received: 20.10.2007.


110<br />

Natura Montenegrina, 6/2007


NATURA MONTENEGRINA, PODGORICA, 6:111-114<br />

A CONTRIBUTION TO THE KNOWLEDGE OF DISTRIBUTION OF SPECIES Bufo<br />

bufo IN MONTENEGRO<br />

Natalija Č A Đ ENOVIĆ ¹<br />

¹Natural History Museum of Montenegro, Podgorica, Crna Gora, E-mail: lazo@cg.yu<br />

Key words:<br />

Bufo bufo,<br />

distribution,<br />

Montenegro<br />

SYNOPSIS<br />

During the herpetological investigations in period 2001-2004<br />

a voluminous material was collected. On various localities in<br />

Montenegro we have collected the species Bufo bufo (Common<br />

Toad), for which there are no relevant literature data for the territory<br />

of Montenegro. This taxon is only reported for Bukumirsko jezero<br />

(lake) by prof. Radovanović (1951) za Durmitor, Skadarsko jezero,<br />

Lovćen, Biogradska gora (Džukić, 1991; 1995).<br />

A list of localities on which Common Toad has been<br />

collected as well asd UTM map with marked localities have been<br />

presented in the paper.<br />

Ključne riječi:<br />

Bufo bufo,<br />

rasprostranjenje,<br />

Crna Gora<br />

SINOPSIS<br />

PRILOG POZNAVANJU RASPROSTRANJENJA<br />

VRSTE Bufo bufo (Linnaeus, 1758) u CRNOJ GORI<br />

Tokom herpetoloških istraživanja u periodu od 2001-2004.<br />

godine sakupljen je obiman materijal. Na različitim lokalitetima u<br />

Crnoj Gori sakupili smo vrstu Bufo bufo (krastavu žabu), za koju ne<br />

postoje relevantni podaci u literaturi za teritoriju <strong>Crne</strong> <strong>Gore</strong>. Ovaj<br />

takson navodi se jedino za Bukumirsko jezero od strane prof.<br />

Radovanovića (1951.)<br />

U radu je naveden spisak lokaliteta na kojima je sakupljena<br />

krastava žaba kao i UTM karta sa unešenim lokalitetima.<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

Bufo bufo is the biggest frog both in our region and in entire Europe<br />

(Radovanović , 1951). Adults of this species are to 15 cm long, with marked<br />

geographical variability in size. Females are significantly bigger than males. In course<br />

of multipliation migrations Bufo bufo covers large distances and it is considered tht it<br />

is one of the most migratory speces of tailless amphibians which may cover a<br />

distance up to 3000 m, what indicates an markedly dispersion potential of the


112<br />

Natura Montenegrina, 6/2007<br />

specimens of this species (S e m l i t c h and B o d i e , 2003). For the time being,<br />

common Common Toads are the only amphibians which, at the level of adult<br />

specimens may also undertake vertical migrations ofseveral hundreds meters<br />

(S z t a t e c s n y and S c h a b e t s b e r g e r , 2005).<br />

LIST OF LOCALITIES ON WHICH COMMON TOAD HAS BEEN RECORDED<br />

1. Skadar Lake CM 5.7<br />

2. The Crnojevića River CM 3.9<br />

3. Lješanska nahija CM 4.9<br />

4. Velje Brdo CN 5.0<br />

5. Kuči CN 7.0<br />

6. Piperi CN 5.1<br />

7. Bjelopavlići CN 4.1<br />

8. Prekornica CN 5.3<br />

9. Mateševo CN 7.3<br />

10. Biogradsko Lake CN 8.4<br />

MATERIAL AND METHODS<br />

Field investigations have been discontinued, as they mainly depended on<br />

weather conditions.<br />

The greatest part of the materiala has mainly been collected in mating period<br />

since at that time a large number of specimens gather at one spot imediately after the<br />

rain, or when the humidity is high. Material has mainly been collected by hand and a<br />

meredov (a net with a handle).<br />

This material has been subjected to morphometric analyses which will be<br />

described in some other paper.<br />

The material has been deposited in herpetological collection of the Natural<br />

History Museum in Podgorici and it is kept in 70% alcohol.<br />

CONCLUSION<br />

So far there have been no relevan data in the literature about the distribution<br />

of this species on the territory of Montenegro. This taxon is reported only for<br />

Bukumirsko Lake by R a d o v a n o v i ć (1951). On basis of the list of localities we may<br />

state that this species is widely distibuted on the territory of Montenegro, but it is also<br />

endangered.


113<br />

Čađenović: A CONTRIBUTION TO THE KNOWLEDGE OF DISTRIBUTION . . .<br />

C M 0 9<br />

BP<br />

CP<br />

DP<br />

BN<br />

CN<br />

DN<br />

BM<br />

CM<br />

DM


114<br />

Natura Montenegrina, 6/2007<br />

LITERATURE<br />

DžUKIĆ , G. 1991: Vodozemci i gmizavci. – Građa za faunu vodozemaca i<br />

gmizavaca Durmitora. In: Nonveiller, G. (ed.) Fauna Durmitora. CANU, Posebna<br />

izdanja 24, Odjeljenje prir. Nauka 15, Sveska 4: 9-78.<br />

DžUKIĆ , G., V U Č KOVIĆ , M., N I K Č EVIĆ , J., M A R I Ć , D., V I Z I , O. 1995:<br />

Revizija bazne studije za prostorni plan. Bazna studija "Flora i Fauna". -<br />

Republički zavod za zaštitu prirode, Podgorica.<br />

RADOVANOVIĆ , M. 1951: Vodozemci i gmizavci naše zemlje. - Naučna knjiga,<br />

Beograd: 46-48.<br />

S E M L I T S C H , R.D., B O D I E , J.R. 2003: Biological criteria for buffer zones around<br />

wetlands and riparian habitats for amphibians and reptiles. - Conservation<br />

Biology, 17: 1219-1228.<br />

S Z T A T E C S N Y , M., S C H A B E T S B E R G E R , R. 2005: Into thin air: vertical<br />

migration, body condition, and quality of terrestrial habitats of alpine common<br />

toads, Bufo bufo. - Cannadian Journal of Zoology, 83: 788-796.<br />

Received: 20.10.2007.


NATURA MONTENEGRINA, PODGORICA, 6:115-122<br />

MORPHOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF A POPULATION OF THE MOSOR<br />

ROCK LIZARD (Dinarolacerta mosorensis KOLOMBATOVIĆ, 1886) (SQUAMATA:<br />

LACERTIDAE) FROM LOVĆEN MOUNTAIN (MONTENEGRO)<br />

Lidija P O L O V I Ć 1 , Katarina LJUBISAVLJEVIĆ 2<br />

1<br />

The Natural History Museum of Montenegro, 81000 Podgorica, Montenegro, e-mail: lidijapolo@cg.yu<br />

2<br />

Department of Evolutionary Biology, Institute for Biological Research „Siniša Stanković“, 11060<br />

Belgrade, Serbia<br />

Key words:<br />

Dinarolacerta<br />

mosorensis,<br />

morphological<br />

characteristics<br />

Synopsis<br />

External morphological traits of the Mosor rock lizard,<br />

Dinarolacerta mosorensis (Kolombatović, 1886) from Lovćen<br />

mountain (Montenegro) were examined. The results of<br />

Descriptive statistics for 14 morphometric, 21 meristic and<br />

percentages of states for eight qualitative traits were<br />

presented. Results are discussed in comparison with the<br />

literature data for other populations.<br />

Ključne riječi:<br />

Dinarolacerta<br />

mosorensis,<br />

morfološke<br />

karakteristike<br />

Sinopsis<br />

MORFOLOŠKE KARAKTERISTIKE POPULACIJE<br />

MOSORSKOG GUŠTERA (DINAROLACERTA MOSORENSIS<br />

KOLOMBATOVIĆ, 1886) (SQUAMATA: LACERTIDAE) SA<br />

PLANINE LOVĆEN, CRNA GORA<br />

U ovom radu analizirane su spoljašnje morfološke<br />

odlike populacije mosorskog guštera Dinarolacerta<br />

mosorensis (Kolombatović, 1886) sa planine Lovćen.<br />

Predstavljeni su rezultati deskriptivne statističke analize 14<br />

morfometrijskih, 21 merističkog i procentualna zastupljenost<br />

stanja osam kvalitativnih karaktera. Rezultati su upoređeni sa<br />

postojećim literaturnim podacima za ostale populacije ove<br />

vrste.


116<br />

Natura Montenegrina, 6/2007<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

The Mosor rock lizard Dinarolacerta mosorensis (Kolombatović , 1886),<br />

previously Lacerta mosorensis (see A r n o l d et al., 2007) represents both a relict<br />

and a steno-endemic species of the Balkan Peninsula (e.g. C r n o b r nj a –<br />

Isailović and Dž u k i ć, 1997). Its distribution is restricted to the south-western<br />

Dinaric mountain karst in Croatia, Bosnia & Herzegovina and Montenegro, exposed to<br />

the influence of the Mediterranean climate. There, it is patchily distributed, restricted<br />

to altitudes ranging between 450 and 1900 m (Dž u k i ć, 1989; C r n o b r nj a –<br />

Isailović and Dž u k i ć, 1997).<br />

The Lovćen population of the Mosor rock lizard is located at the south-eastern<br />

boundary of the distribution range. Here it occupies altitudes from 1200 to 1350 m<br />

inhabiting the cliffs and blocks of rocks surrounded by subalpine beech forest (plant<br />

community Fagetum montenegrinum subalpinum) with whitebark pine (Pinus<br />

heldreichii) as the differential species (T o m i ć – S t a n k o v i ć, 1970;<br />

Ljubisavljević et al., in press).<br />

Up until very recently D. mosorensis was one of the least studied<br />

representatives of the European herpetofauna (Dž u k i ć, 1989; O d i e r n a and<br />

A r r i b a s , 2005). However, the latest studies have revealed substantial morphological<br />

and genetic differences among populations of the Mosor rock lizard (C a r r a n z a et<br />

al., 2004; Lj u b i s a v lj e v i ć et al., 2007) and certain peculiarities in life-history<br />

traits (Lj u b i s a v lj e v i ć et al., in press).<br />

Although specimens from the Lovćen population were included in some of these<br />

studies, complete descriptive data on morphological characters have not been<br />

published until now.<br />

Dinarolacerta mosorens-adult specimen


117<br />

Polović, Ljubisavljević: MORPHOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF A POPULATION OF THE . . .<br />

MATERIAL AND METHODS<br />

Analyses were carried out on the samples collected from localities Ivanova<br />

korita (42° 22’ N, 18°50’ E) and Međuvršje (42°24’ N, 18°50’ E) in the Lovćen mt. A<br />

total of 22 adult males, 23 females, 2 immature males and 5 immature females were<br />

examined. Specimens preserved in 70% ethanol were from Dr Georg Džukić's<br />

Herpetological Collection of the Institute for Biological Research, Belgrade (Međuvršje<br />

locality), and the Herpetological Collection of the Natural History Museum of<br />

Montenegro, Podgorica (Ivanova korita locality). Specimens were examined for the<br />

following characters:<br />

Morphometric characters: Tot – total length, Lcor – snout-vent length, Lcap –<br />

head length, Ltcap - head width, Altcap - head height, Lfo – mouth length, Ltfo –<br />

mouth width, Lpa – forelimb length, Lpp – hindlimb length, Ldg – length of fourth toe<br />

on hindlimb, Lpil – pileus length, Ltpil – pileus width, Doa – orbit to ear distance, Pap<br />

– distance between fore and hind limbs.<br />

Meristic characters included the numbers of: SOC – supraocular scales, CIL -<br />

supraciliary scales, GRA - supraciliary granules, POC – postocular scales, TMP –<br />

temporal scales, STM - supratemporal scales, PNS - postnasal scales, 1LO - first<br />

loreal scales, 2LO second loreal scales, PROC - praeocular scales, SLB- supralabial<br />

scales anterior to subocular, SUB - sublabial scales, SMX - submaxilar scales, GUL -<br />

gular scales along the throat midline, COL – large collar scales, VENT – inner ventral<br />

scales counted longitudinally, DOR – dorsal scales around mid-body, PAN – praeanal<br />

scales surrounding anteriorly the anal plate, FPO – femoral pores, FEM – femural<br />

scales, SDG – lamellar scales under the fourth toe.<br />

Qualitative characters: (I) masseteric plate: a—single, b—divided, c—indistinct.<br />

(II) row of supraciliary granules: a—complete; b—incomplete (included cases when<br />

only one granula was separated from the rest). (III) additional scale between the first<br />

postocular 1POC and the last supraocular 4SOC scale: a—present, b— absent. (IV)<br />

multiplication of supralabials anterior to subocular scale: a—by insertion of additional<br />

small scales, b—by vertical splitting of scales, c—state of four supralabials. (V) type<br />

of dorsal pattern: a—diffuse, scattered spots, b—diffuse, interconnected spots in more<br />

or less reticulate pattern, c—banded pattern, spots arranged in a single vertebral<br />

and/or two narrow juxtaposed paravertebral bands, d—banded pattern, broad<br />

vertebral band consisting of scattered spots, e—absent. (VI) spots of the dorsal<br />

pattern: a—large, b—medium, c—small, d—absent. (VII) areas of background color<br />

free of dark pattern: a—broad, b—narrow, c—absent. (VIII) lateral bands: a—distinct,<br />

b—indistinct. The band names of dorsal pattern were according to A r n o l d and<br />

B u r t o n (1978).<br />

Symetrical characters were taken from both sides of the body. Data processing<br />

concerned the mean of the right and left values for quantitative traits, while for<br />

qualitative traits a combination of both sides was used.<br />

The body and head dimensions were taken with digital callipers to the nearest<br />

0.01 mm. Scale counts were taken under a stereoscopic microscope. For<br />

morphometric and qualitative characters, statistical analyses included only mature


118<br />

Natura Montenegrina, 6/2007<br />

individuals, while for analysis of the scalation, adults and immature individuals were<br />

pooled.<br />

Descriptive statistics (mean, standard error, range) for quantitative traits, and<br />

percentages of states for each qualitative trait were calculated. Statistical analyses<br />

were carried out using the computer package Statistica (STATISTICA for Windows.<br />

StatSoft, Inc., Tulsa, OK, USA).<br />

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION<br />

Quantitative traits<br />

Descriptive statistics of morphometric and meristic characters of adult males and<br />

females are presented in Tables 1 and 2. Maximum total length recorded was 205 mm<br />

and 197 mm for males and females, respectively. These values are smaller than those<br />

previously reported for the species as a whole (up to 220 mm, B i s c h o f f, 1984),<br />

and Herzegovinian population (222 mm, V e i t h, 1991). However, it should be noted<br />

that due to the great number of regenerating individuals, we could analyse total length<br />

on a small sample. Our measures showed that snout-vent length (Lcor) values for<br />

females were between 56.3 – 70.7 mm ( x = 63.8 mm ± 0.8), and for males were<br />

between 59.5 – 71.1 mm ( x = 65.5 mm ± 0.7). While female data were mainly in<br />

accordance with literature data (57 - 64.4 - 68 mm, Bischoff, 1984), males showed<br />

greater mean Lcor than previously reported (51 – 62.3 - 68 mm Bischoff, 1984). No<br />

concrete literature data are available regarding the other morphometric characters<br />

here analysed.<br />

males<br />

females<br />

Character N Mean Min Max SE N Mean Min Max SE<br />

Tot 5 192.00 179.00 205.00 4.54 6 176.17 160.00 197.00 5.63<br />

Lcor 22 65.53 59.53 71.08 0.67 23 63.76 56.34 70.72 0.82<br />

Lcap 22 16.85 15.67 17.62 0.14 23 14.41 13.46 15.71 0.12<br />

Ltcap 22 10.37 9.03 11.68 0.15 23 8.79 7.80 9.74 0.10<br />

Altcap 22 6.75 5.54 8.33 0.16 23 5.49 5.02 6.06 0.07<br />

Lfo 22 12.77 11.62 13.59 0.12 23 11.07 10.35 12.05 0.10<br />

Ltfo 22 9.82 8.67 10.90 0.15 23 8.30 7.30 9.33 0.09<br />

Lpa 22 22.79 20.94 24.58 0.19 23 20.23 18.72 22.10 0.18<br />

Lpp 22 36.06 32.70 40.57 0.39 23 31.39 29.73 34.37 0.25<br />

Ldg 22 11.39 10.63 12.80 0.11 23 10.15 9.15 11.08 0.10<br />

Lpil 22 15.66 14.37 16.43 0.14 23 13.41 12.60 14.58 0.11<br />

Ltpil 22 6.85 6.30 7.30 0.06 23 6.01 5.50 6.60 0.06<br />

Doa 22 5.12 4.60 5.65 0.07 23 3.96 3.50 4.60 0.05<br />

Pap 22 29.01 25.85 31.96 0.36 23 32.16 25.82 38.24 0.63<br />

Table 1. Descriptive statistics of 14 morphometric characters of adult male and female<br />

Dinarolacerta mosorensis of the Lovćen population studied. Sample size (N), mean value (in mm),<br />

range, standard error (SE). Abbreviations of characters are given in “Material and Methods”.


119<br />

Polović, Ljubisavljević: MORPHOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF A POPULATION OF THE . . .<br />

Concerning meristic characters, the mean number of four supraocular scales<br />

and variation range of supraciliary scales were in agreement with literature data (CIL:<br />

5 – 8, Bischoff, 1984), while the number of supraciliary granules varied (especially in<br />

females) in a broader range than it was previously described for this species (GRA: 8<br />

– 12, Bischoff, 1984). The most frequently detected number of two postnasals (PNS)<br />

in our sample was in agreement with previous studies (M é h e l y, 1903;<br />

Radovanović , 1951; B i s c h o f f , 1984; A r n o l d and O v e n d e n, 2002; A r n o<br />

l d et al., 2007). The number of loreal (1LO, 2LO) and praeocular scales (PROC)<br />

varied from 1 – 2, although individuals with single-scale state were the most frequent<br />

in our sample. Previous literature data (B i s c h o f f, 1984) also showed single state<br />

of these scales as characteristic for this species. The usual number of four or five<br />

supralabial scales (SLB) in front of the subocular (with possibility of an asymmetric<br />

condition), as well as usual number of six sublabial (SUB) and submaxilar scales<br />

(SMX) reported for D. mosorensis by other authors (e.g. R a d o v a n o v i ć , 1951; B i s<br />

c h o f f, 1984; A r n o l d et al., 2007) were in agreement with our results. However,<br />

the number of gular (GUL), dorsal (DOR) and subdigital scales (SDG) varied in<br />

broader range than previously recorded (GUL: 23 - 30; DOR: 36 - 40 - 45; SDG: 22 –<br />

23,4 - 25 in B i s c h o f f, 1984). The mean values and/or variation range for other<br />

analysed meristic characters were mainly in agreement with those previously reported<br />

for this species (e.g. R a d o v a n o v i ć, 1951; B i s c h o f f, 1984).<br />

males<br />

females<br />

Character N Mean Min Max SE N Mean Min Max SE<br />

SOC 24 4.02 4.00 4.50 0.02 28 4.00 4.00 4.00 0.00<br />

CIL 24 5.94 4.50 7.00 0.15 28 6.09 5.50 8.00 0.12<br />

GRA 24 9.17 7.00 11.50 0.25 28 8.65 5.00 12.00 0.29<br />

POC 24 3.81 2.50 4.00 0.08 28 3.52 3.00 4.50 0.10<br />

TMP 24 42.23 24.50 73.00 2.07 28 39.09 25.00 54.00 1.69<br />

STM 24 2.52 1.50 3.50 0.11 28 2.35 2.00 3.00 0.07<br />

PNS 24 1.88 1.00 2.00 0.06 28 1.96 1.50 2.00 0.03<br />

1LO 24 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 28 1.02 1.00 1.50 0.02<br />

2LO 24 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 28 1.07 1.00 2.00 0.05<br />

PROC 24 1.13 1.00 2.00 0.06 28 1.07 1.00 2.00 0.04<br />

SLB 24 4.69 4.00 5.50 0.12 28 4.57 3.50 5.00 0.08<br />

SUB 24 6.02 4.50 7.00 0.11 28 6.04 5.00 7.00 0.10<br />

SMX 24 5.96 5.50 6.00 0.03 28 5.78 5.00 6.00 0.08<br />

GUL 24 25.88 20.00 32.00 0.52 28 24.48 19.00 28.00 0.40<br />

COL 24 8.83 6.00 10.00 0.21 28 8.67 7.00 11.00 0.22<br />

VENT 24 25.25 23.50 27.50 0.23 28 26.72 25.00 29.00 0.21<br />

DOR 24 39.06 33.00 44.00 0.66 28 38.46 30.50 43.00 0.59<br />

PAN 24 7.71 6.00 9.00 0.13 28 7.30 6.90 9.00 0.18<br />

FPO 24 18.35 16.50 21.00 0.23 28 17.19 12.00 20.50 0.32<br />

FEM 24 4.00 3.00 5.00 0.11 28 3.67 3.00 4.50 0.10<br />

SDG 24 22.29 20.00 24.50 0.24 28 21.96 20.00 25.50 0.26<br />

Table 2. Descriptive statistics of 21 meristic characters of adult male and female Dinarolacerta<br />

mosorensis of the Lovćen population studied. Sample size (N), mean value (in mm), range,<br />

standard error (SE). Abbreviations of characters are given in “Material and Methods”.


120<br />

Natura Montenegrina, 6/2007<br />

males<br />

(N = 22)<br />

females<br />

(N = 23)<br />

males<br />

(N = 22)<br />

females<br />

(N = 23)<br />

character % % character % %<br />

Iaa 68 65 VIa 73 83<br />

Iab 5 4 VIb 9 13<br />

Iac 9 22 VIc 9 4<br />

Ibb 0 0 VId 9 0<br />

Ibc 0 0 VIIa 5 4<br />

Icc 18 9 VIIb 0 9<br />

IIaa 68 57 VIIc 95 87<br />

IIab 14 13 VIIIa 5 35<br />

IIbb 18 30 VIIIb 95 65<br />

IIIaa 0 0<br />

IIIab 5 4<br />

IIIbb 95 96<br />

IVaa 0 0<br />

IVab 5 4<br />

IVac 5 9<br />

IVbb 41 35<br />

IVbc 23 26<br />

IVcc 27 26<br />

Va 23 46<br />

Vb 64 46<br />

Vc 5 13<br />

Vd 0 0<br />

Ve 9 0<br />

Table 3. Percentages of states of qualitative traits (in %) in Dinarolacerta mosorensis of<br />

the Lovć en population. For symmetrical traits combination of states for both body sides<br />

were given. Abbreviations of characters are given in “Material and Methods”.<br />

Qualitative traits<br />

Percentages of states for qualitative traits of adult males and females are<br />

presented in Table 3. In general, analysed individuals are characterised by the<br />

presence of single masseteric plate (Ia), complete row of supraciliary granules (IIa),<br />

absence of additional scale between the first postocular and the last supraocular<br />

scale (IIIb), and symmetrical multiplication of supralabials by vertical partition of<br />

scales (IVbb). Concerning the type of dorsal pattern, they are distinguished by<br />

predominance of diffuse type consisting of large size spots coupled with indistinct<br />

lateral bands (Va,b; VIa; VIIIb) and the absence of areas of background color free of<br />

dark pattern (VIIc). The diffuse pattern with interconnected spots in more or less<br />

reticulate pattern was predominant in males (Vb), while in females reticulate pattern<br />

(Vb) and scattered spots (Va) were present in the same percentage. A certain<br />

percentage of individuals of both sexes with symmetrical presence of an indistinct<br />

masseteric plate (Icc), and complete absence of dorsal pattern (males) (Ve, VId) were<br />

also recorded from Lovćen population.


121<br />

Polović, Ljubisavljević: MORPHOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF A POPULATION OF THE . . .<br />

Concerning the qualitative traits, the prevalence of specimens with distinct<br />

masseteric plate, complete row of supraciliary granules and diffuse reticulate pattern<br />

found in this study were also considered characteristic for the Mosor rock lizard (R a d<br />

o v a n o v i ć, 1951; B i s c h o f f, 1984; A r n o l d et al., 2007). On the other hand,<br />

we rarely found unmarked (uniform) specimens, the feature frequently referred to D.<br />

mosorensis by other authors (T o m a s s i n i, 1889; B i s c h o f f, 1984; V e i t h,<br />

1991; A r n o l d and O v e n d e n, 2002).<br />

CONCLUSION<br />

Most of the values or percentages of occurrences obtained from the present<br />

analysis of external morphology of the Mosor rock lizard are in accordance (or within<br />

the variation range) with previous studies of the species. However, the number of<br />

supraciliary granules, supralabial, gular, dorsal and subdigital scales varied in<br />

somewhat broader range than it was previously reported for a species as a whole.<br />

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS<br />

We are grateful to Georg Džukić for useful comments and making part of literature and<br />

sample collection available to us. We also thank Miloš Kalezić for helpful suggestions. Katarina<br />

Ljubisavljević was supported by the Serbian Ministry of Science (grant no. 143052, “Patterns of<br />

amphibian and reptile diversity on the Balkan Peninsula”).<br />

LITERATURE<br />

A R N O L D, E. N., and J. A. B U R T O N. (1978). A Field Guide to the Reptiles and<br />

Amphibians of Britain and Europe. - Harper Collins Publishers, London, UK, 1-272.<br />

A R N O L D, E. N., and D. O V E N D E N (2002). A Field Guide to the Reptiles and<br />

Amphibians of Britain and Europe. Second Edition. - HarperCollins Publishers, London,<br />

UK, 1-288.<br />

A R N O L D, E. N., A R R I B A S, O., and S. C A R R A N Z A (2007). Systematics of the<br />

Palaearctic and Oriental Lizard Tribe Lacertini (Squamata: Lacertidae: Lacertinae), with<br />

Descriptions of Eight New Genera. - Zootaxa 1430, 1-86.<br />

B I S C H O F F, W. (1984). Lacerta mosorensis Kolombatović, 1886, Mosor-Eidechse, In:<br />

Handbuch der Reptilien und Amphibien Europas, 2-1, Echsen II, Lacerta (Ed. W. Böhme),<br />

290-300. Aula -Verlag, Wiesbaden, Germany.<br />

C A R R A N Z A, S., A R N O L D, E. N., and F. A M A T (2004). DNA Phylogeny of Lacerta<br />

(Iberolacerta) and other Lacertine Lizards (Reptilia:Lacertidae): Did Competition Cause<br />

Long-term Restriction?. - Systematics and Biodiversity 2, 57-77.<br />

C R N O B R N J A – I S A I L O V I Ć, J., and G. DŽ U K I Ć (1997). Lacerta mosorensis. In:<br />

Atlas of the Amphibians and Reptiles in Europe (Eds. J. P. Gasc, A. Cabela, J. Crnobrnja-


122<br />

Natura Montenegrina, 6/2007<br />

Isailović, D. Dolmen, K. Grossenbacher, P. Haffner, J. Lescure, H. Martens, J. P.<br />

Martýnez Rica, H. Maurin, M. E. Oliveira T. S. Sofianidou, M. Veith, and A. Zuiderwijk),<br />

250-251. Societas Europaea Herpetologica & Museum Nationall d’ Histoire Naturelle,<br />

Paris.<br />

DŽ U K I Ć, G. (1989). Remarks on Distribution and Protection Problems of the Mosor Rock<br />

Lizard, Lacerta mosorensis Kolombatović, 1886 (Reptilia, Lacertidae). - Biologia Gallohelenica<br />

15,185-190.<br />

LJ U B I S A V LJ E V I Ć, K., A R R I B A S, O., DŽ U K I Ć, G. and S. C A R R A N Z A<br />

(2007). Genetic and Morphological Differentiation of Mosor Rock Lizards, Dinarolacerta<br />

mosorensis (Kolombatović, 1886), with the Description of a New Species from the<br />

Prokletije Mountain Massif (Montenegro) (Squamata: Lacertidae). - Zootaxa 1613,1-22.<br />

LJ U B I S A V LJ E V I Ć, K., P O L O V I Ć, L., T O M A Š E V I Ć – K O L A R O V, N.,<br />

DŽUKIĆ , G., and M. L. K A L E Z I Ć. Female Life-history Characteristics of the Mosor<br />

Rock Lizard, Dinarolacerta mosorensis (Kolombatović, 1886) from Montenegro<br />

(Squamata: Lacertidae). - J. Nat. Hist., in press.<br />

M É H E L Y, L. (1903). Lacerta mosorensis Kolomb., a Magyar királyság új gyikja,<br />

származástani kapcsolatában. - Állattani Közlemények, Budapest, 212 pp.<br />

O D I E R N A, G. and O. A R R I B A S (2005). The Karyology of ‘Lacerta’ mosorensis<br />

Kolombatovic, 1886, and Its Bearing on Phylogenetic Relationships to other European<br />

Mountain Lizards. - Ital. J. Zool. 72, 93-96.<br />

R A D O V A N O V I Ć, M. (1951). Vodozemci i gmizavci naše zemlje. - Naučna knjiga,<br />

Beograd, 1-249.<br />

T O M A S S I N I, O. (1889). Crtice o životu gmazova koji žive u Bosni i Hercegovini. - Glasnik<br />

Zem. muz. u B. i H. 1, 46-60.<br />

T O M I Ć – S T A N K O V I Ć, K. (1970). Flora Lovćena I. - Zbornik Filozofskog Fakulteta u<br />

Prištini, 7,1-39.<br />

V E I T H, G. (1991). Die Reptilien Bosniens und der Herzegowina, teil I. Herpetozoa 3, 97-196.<br />

Received: 12. 11. 2007.


NATURA MONTENEGRINA, PODGORICA, 6:123-129<br />

CONTRIBUTION TO THE CHEMICAL CONSTITUENTS OF BALKAN BRYOPHYTES:<br />

PHENOLIC ACIDS, FLAVONOIDS, TRITERPENES AND ALKALOIDS<br />

Nebojša J O C K O V I Ć 1 , Milica P A V L O V I Ć 1 , Marko SABOVLJEVIĆ 2, * and<br />

Nada K O V A Č EVIĆ 1<br />

1<br />

Department of Pharmacognosy, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Belgrade, Vojvode Stepe 450, 11000<br />

Belgrade, Serbia<br />

2<br />

Institute of Botany and Garden, Faculty of Biology, University of Belgrade, Takovska 43, 11000<br />

Belgrade, Serbia<br />

* corresponding author: marko@worldpost.eu<br />

Key Words:<br />

Bryophyte chemistry,<br />

mosses,<br />

liverworts,<br />

phenolic acids,<br />

flavonoids,<br />

triterpenes,<br />

alkaloids<br />

Synopsis<br />

In this paper preliminary study of chemical constituents<br />

of three bryophyte species will be presented. Gametophytes<br />

of Polytrichum formosum, Eurhynchium hians (mosses) and<br />

Pellia endiviifolia (liverworth) have been collected in the<br />

native habitats in Petnica near Valjevo (W. Serbia). TLC<br />

technique was applied for the preliminary study of petroleum<br />

ether and methanol extracts of three investigated species.<br />

According to this assay the presence of flavonoids (aglycones<br />

and glycosides) in all examined extracts was confirmed. In extracts<br />

of two species phenolic acids were detected. Besides, in the<br />

petroleum ether extract of all three species triterpenes were<br />

detected. Alkaloids were absent in the extracts of investigated<br />

bryophyte species.<br />

Ključne reči:<br />

hemija briofita,<br />

mahovine,<br />

jetrenjače,<br />

fenolne kiseline,<br />

flavonoidi,<br />

triterpeni,<br />

alkaloidi<br />

Sinopsis<br />

PRILOG POZNAVANJU HEMIJSKOG SASTAVA<br />

BALKANSKIH BRIOFITA: FENOLNE KISELINE,<br />

FLAVONOIDI, TRITERPENI I ALKALOIDI<br />

U ovom radu su dati preliminarni rezultati hemijskih<br />

konstituenata tri vrste briofita. Gametofiti Polytrichum<br />

formosum, Eurhynchium hians (mahovine) i Pellia endiviifolia<br />

(jetrenjača) su sakupljeni u prirodnim staništima okoline<br />

Valjeva (Zap. Srbija). Primenjena je TLC tehnika (tankoslojna<br />

hromatografija) u karakterisanju petroleimskog i metanolnog<br />

ekstrakta tri odabrane vrste.<br />

Prisustvo flavonoida (aglikona i glikozida) je potvrdjeno<br />

u svim analiziranim ekstraktima. U ekstraktima dve vrste<br />

detektovane su fenolne kiseline. Osim toga u petroleumskom<br />

ekstraktu sve tri vrste detektovani su triterpeni. Alkaloidi nisi<br />

pronadjeni kod ni jedne od tri istraživane vrste.


124<br />

Natura Montenegrina, 6/2007<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

Chemical studies of the bryophytes were neglected for a long time. They have<br />

now been shown to be a storehouse of naturally occurring materials, including some<br />

with novel chemical structures. Many of these materials display considerable<br />

biological activity. Investigations are hampered frequently by too small amounts of<br />

plant material. The resulting low yields of components are then generally inadequate<br />

to permit testing for biological activity. In vitro culture and appropriate chemical<br />

synthesis on a preparative scale are being undertaken to overcome this difficulty.<br />

However, bryophytes are the second biggest group of land plants after flowering<br />

plants and a source of chemically new and unknown compounds (e.g. A s a k a w a ,<br />

1994, 2001; S a b o v l j e v i ć & al., 2001; Z i n s m e i s t e r & al., 2003.). Studies of<br />

chemical constituents of bryophytes are recently being performed, but still inadequate<br />

and neglected (A s a k a w a , 1995; T o y o t a & al., 1998; E d e l m a n n & al., 1998;<br />

S p e i c h e r & al., 2000, 2001; K l i n k & al., 2002; P o pper & Fry, 2003;<br />

H e r t e w i c h & al., 2003). These data help in systematic of hardly morphologically<br />

classified bryophytes (e.g. A s a k a w a , 2004). The data on biological activities of<br />

bryophyte extracts and/or chemical constituents are even hard to find (e.g. B a s i l e &<br />

al., 1998a, b, 1999; D u l g e r & al., 2005; S a b o v l j e v i ć & al., 2006,<br />

Sabovljević & Sabovljević , 2007)<br />

MATERIAL AND METHODS<br />

Three selected bryophyte species were used for phytochemical screening using<br />

TLC technique in order to show the presence of phenolic components, triterpenes and<br />

alkaloids in the their extracts. One liverwort and two mosses, Pellia endiviifolia<br />

(Dicks.) Dumort. (talous liverwort), Eurhynchium hians (Hedw.) Sande Lac.<br />

(pleurocarpous moss) and Polytrichum formosum Hedw. (acrocarpous moss) were<br />

analysed. Only the gametophytes were used for the chemical analyses. The<br />

specimens were collected in the native habitats in Petnica near Valjevo (W. Serbia) in<br />

August 2002, dried at the room temperature and stored in paper bags at 4°C till the<br />

beginning of the experiments.<br />

Preparation of extracts<br />

3.0 g of ground material was extracted by maceration with 30 ml of petroleum<br />

ether during 48h at room temperature, the extract was filtered and taken into dryness<br />

under reduced pressure. The dry residue was dissolved in 0.2 ml of petroleum ether.<br />

The same material used in previous step was left to dry, and extracted afterward with<br />

30 ml of methanol at the sonic bath during 30 minutes. The extract was filtered, the<br />

filtrate concentrated under reduced pressure and residue taken up in 0.2 ml of<br />

methanol.


125<br />

Jocković; Pavlović, Sabovljević, Kovačević: CONTRIBUTION TO THE CHEMICAL CONSTITUENTS . .<br />

Thin layer chromatography<br />

Thin layer chromatography was performed on silica gel 60 F 254 plates (DC<br />

Alufolien, Merck, Germany). The mobile phases used were: toluene-ethyl acetate<br />

(70:30, v/v) for flavonoid aglycones and triterpenes, ethyl acetate-formic acid-glacial<br />

acetic acid-water (100:11:11:26, v/v/v/v) for phenolic acids and flavonoid glycosides<br />

and toluene-ethyl acetate-diethylamine (70:20:10, v/v/v) for alkaloids.<br />

Chromatograms were evaluated under UV light at 254 and 365 nm before and<br />

after spraying with NP-reagent for flavonoids, after spraying with vanillin-sulphuric<br />

acid reagent (VS) for triterpenes and Dragendorff reagent for alkaloids (W a g n e r &<br />

B l a d t , 1996).<br />

RESULTS<br />

The lipophilic compounds of Eurhynchium hians, Pellia endiviifolia and<br />

Polytrichum formosum were isolated by petroleum ether and analysed by TLC in<br />

toluene-ethyl acetate (70:30, v/v). The chromatogram of petroleum ether extract of<br />

Eurhynchium hians, Pellia endiviifolia and Polytrichum formosum showed the<br />

presence of several zones that correspond to flavonoid aglycones. They were<br />

detected by quenching fluorescence under UV-245 nm and by yellow fluorescence<br />

under UV light at 365 nm before and after spraying with NP-reagent.<br />

Comparing the positions of the zones of yellow fluorescence of all three<br />

bryophyte species on the chromatogram, it may be concluded that they contain some<br />

substances in common, having at least one substance present in all three petroleum<br />

ether extracts (Fig. 1)<br />

After developing the chromatogram in the mobile phase toluene-ethyl acetate<br />

(70:30, v/v), and spraying with vanillin-sulphuric acid reagent triterpenes were shown<br />

as bluish-violet zones in the petroleum ether extracts of the examined bryophyte<br />

species (Fig. 2).<br />

The zones in extracts of Pellia endiviifolia and Polytrichum formosum that are<br />

the closest to the start line might derive of the same compound. Similarly, the zones in<br />

Eurhynchium hians and Polytrichum formosum that are the closest to the solvent front<br />

are likely to represent the same substance. Regarding the zones at the half of the<br />

chromatogram, it may be concluded that petroleum ether extracts of all three<br />

bryophytes have one compound in common from triterpene group (Fig. 2).<br />

Methanolic extracts of Eurhynchium hians, Pellia endiviifolia and Polytrichum<br />

formosum were analysed by TLC in ethyl acetate-formic acid-glacial acetic acid-water<br />

(100:11:11:26, v/v/ v/v) as developing solvent. Flavonoid glycosides were detected in<br />

the chromatogram of methanol extracts of all three species as yellow fluorescing<br />

zones (UV-365 nm) before and after spraying with NP reagent. Chromatogram of<br />

methanol extracts of Pellia endiviifolia and Polytrichum formosum, near the solvent<br />

front showed the presence of blue fluorescing zones in UV light at 365 nm which<br />

correspond to the phenolic acids.


126<br />

Natura Montenegrina, 6/2007<br />

Figure 1. Chromatogram of petroleum ether<br />

extracts of Eurhynchium hians (1), Pellia<br />

endiviifolia (2) and Polytrichum formosum (3),<br />

obtained in toluene-ethylacetate (70:30, v/v),<br />

after spraying with NP reagent, under UV light<br />

at 365 nm.<br />

Figure 2. Chromatogram of petroleum ether<br />

extract of Eurhynchium hians (1), Pellia<br />

endiviifolia (2) and Polytrichum formosum (3),<br />

obtained in toluene-ethyl acetate (70:30, v/v),<br />

after spraying with vanillin-sulphuric acid<br />

reagent.


127<br />

Jocković; Pavlović, Sabovljević, Kovačević: CONTRIBUTION TO THE CHEMICAL CONSTITUENTS . .<br />

In order to screen methanolic extracts of analysed bryophyte species for<br />

presence of alkaloids, the chromatograms were developed in toluene-ethyl acetatediethylamine<br />

(70:20:10, v/v/v), and sprayed with Dragendorff reagent. Under given<br />

conditions of analysis, no orange-brown or brownish zones that correspond to alkaloid<br />

compounds could be noticed.<br />

CONCLUSION<br />

The study gives first insight into chemistry of bryophytes from the Balkan<br />

Peninsula. The compounds detected are already known among bryophytes. Generally,<br />

liverworts are more often used for chemical studies due to their oil bodies and so<br />

other species of Pellia was subject of chemical content studies. However, it remains<br />

unknown to the authors whether there have been previously chemical analyses of<br />

selected moss species for this study at all.<br />

Acknowledgement<br />

Many thanks to Dr. Rayna Natcheva (Sofia) for valuable comments to manuscript.<br />

LITERATURE<br />

ASAKAWA, Y. (1994): Highlights in Phytochemistry of Hepaticae - Biologically<br />

Active Terpenoids and Aromatic Compounds. - Pure and Applied Chemistry,<br />

66(10/11): 2193-2196.<br />

ASAKAWA Y. (1995): Chemical Constituents of the Bryophytes. In: Herz W., Kirby<br />

G. W., Moore R. W., Steglich W. and Tamm Ch. (Eds.), Progress in the<br />

Chemistry of Organic Natural Products, Vol 65. Springer Verlag, Wien, New<br />

York.<br />

ASAKAWA, Y. (2001): Recent Advances in Phytochemistry of Bryophytesacetogenins,Terpenoids<br />

and Bis(bibenzyl)s from Selected Japanese, Taiwanese,<br />

New Zealand, Argentinean and European Lliverworts. - Phytochemistry 56: 297-<br />

312.<br />

ASAKAWA, Y. (2004): Chemosystematics of the Hepaticae. Phytochemistry, 65:<br />

623-669.<br />

BASILE, A., SORBO, S., GIORDANO, S., LAVITOLA, A. & CASTALDO-<br />

C O B I A N C H I , R. (1998a): Antibacterial Activity in Pleurochaete squarrosa<br />

extract. - International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents, 10: 169-172.


128<br />

Natura Montenegrina, 6/2007<br />

BASILE, A., GIORDANO, S., SORBO, S., VUOTTO, M. L., IELPO, M. T. L.<br />

& C A S T A L D O - C O B I A N C H I , R. (1998b): Antibiotic Effects of Lunularia<br />

cruciata (Bryophyta) Extract. - Pharmaceutical Biology, 36 (1): 25-28.<br />

BASILE, A., GIORDANO, S., LÓPEZ-SÁEZ, J. A., CASTALDO-<br />

C O B I A N C H I , R. (1999): Antibacterial Activity of Pure Flavonoids Isolated<br />

from Mosses. - Phytochemistry, 52: 1479-1482.<br />

DULGER, B., TONGUÇ-YAYINTAS, Ö. & GONUZ, A. 2005. Antimicrobial<br />

Activities of some Mosses from Turkey. - Fitoterapia, 76: 730-732.<br />

E D E L M A N N , H., N E I N H U I S , C., J A R V I S , M. C., E V A N S , B., F I S C H E R ,<br />

E. & B A R T H L O T T , W. (1998): Ultrastructure and Chemistry of the Cell Wall<br />

of the Moss Rhacocarpus purpurascens (Rhacocarpaceae): a Puzzling<br />

Architecture among Plants. - Planta, 206: 315-321.<br />

HERTEWICH U.M., ZAPP J. & BECKER H. (2003): Secondary Metabolites<br />

from the Liverwort Jamesoniella colorata. - Phytochemistry, 63 (2): 227-233.<br />

KLINK, J.W.VAN, ZAPP, J. & BECKER, H. (2002): Pinguisane-type<br />

Sesquiterpenes from the South American Liverwort Porella recurva (Taylor)<br />

Kuhnemann. - Zeitschrift für Naturforschung, 57: 413-417.<br />

POPPER, Z. A. & FRY, S.C. (2003): Primary Cell Wall Composition of Bryophytes<br />

and Charophytes. - Annals of Botany, 91: 1-12.<br />

SABOVLJEVIĆ , M., BIJELOVIĆ , A. & G R U B I Š I Ć , D. (2001): Bryophytes as<br />

a Potential Source of Medicinal Compounds. - Lekovite Sirovine, 21: 17 – 29.<br />

SABOVLJEVIĆ , A., S O K O V I Ć , M., SABOVLJEVIĆ , M. & G R U B I Š I Ć , D.<br />

(2006): Antimicrobial Activity of Bryum argenteum. – Fitoterapia, 77: 144-145.<br />

SABOVLJEVIĆ , A. & SABOVLJEVIĆ , M. (2007): Bryophytes, a Source of Bioactive<br />

and New Compounds. – In: G o v i l , J. N. (ed.). Phytopharmacology and Therapeutic<br />

Values IV, the Series "Recent Progress in Medicinal Plants". Pp. 9-25.<br />

SPEICHER, A., HOLLEMEYER, K. & H E I N Z L E , E. (2000): Rapid Detection<br />

of Multiple Chlorinated Bis(bibenzyls) in Bryophyte Crude Extracts Using Laser<br />

Desorption/ionization time-of-flight Mass Spectrometry. - Rapid Communications<br />

in Mass Spectrometry, 15 (2): 124 – 127.<br />

SPEICHER, A., HOLLEMEYER, K. & HEINZLE, E. (2001): Rapid Detection<br />

of Chlorinated Bisbenzyls in Bazzania trilobata Using MALDI-TOF Mass<br />

Spectrometry. – Phytochemistry, 57: 303-306.<br />

TOYOTA, M., MASUDA, K. & ASAKAWA, Y. (1998): Triterpenoid Constituents<br />

of the Moss Floribundaria aurea subsp. nipponica. - Phytochemistry, 48 (2): 297-<br />

299.<br />

W A G N E R , H. & B L A D T , S. (1996): Plant Drug Analysis, A Thin Layer<br />

Chromatography Atlas. Springer-Verlag Berlin.


129<br />

Jocković; Pavlović, Sabovljević, Kovačević: CONTRIBUTION TO THE CHEMICAL CONSTITUENTS . .<br />

Z I N S M E I S T E R , H. D., B E C K E R , H. & E I C H E R , T. (2003): Bryophytes, a<br />

Source of Biologically Active, Naturally Occurring Material. - Angewandte<br />

Chemie, 30(2): 130-147.<br />

Received: 07.05.2007.


130<br />

Natura Montenegrina, 6/2007


NATURA MONTENEGRINA, PODGORICA, 6:131-136<br />

PCR (Polymerase Chain Reaction) IN DETECTION OF Chlamydia trachomatis AND THE<br />

OTHER METHODS – A COMPARATIVE SURVEY<br />

Danko OBRADOVIĆ 1<br />

1<br />

University of Montenegro, Faculty of Sciences, Department of Biology, P. O. Box 211, 81000 Podgorica,<br />

Montenegro<br />

Key words:<br />

PCR,<br />

Chlamydia<br />

trachomatis<br />

Klučne riječi:<br />

PCR,<br />

Chlamydia<br />

trachomatis<br />

Synopsis<br />

Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) based methods are the<br />

most advanced methods for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis.<br />

There are various tests for detection of C. trachomatis. Many<br />

people, including specialists, do not know about reliability of tests<br />

and a comparative survey is welcome for overcoming this problem.<br />

Lack of sensitivity, specificity, or both, sensitivity and specificity, and<br />

some other disadvantages are common problems of those tests.<br />

However, polymerase chain reaction based methods do not have<br />

any of those common problems. They are the best methods for<br />

detection of C. trachomatis, which provide the most reliable results.<br />

Samples can be processed in just 5-6 hours. Disadvantage of PCR<br />

based methods is high price and high technology which makes them<br />

unavailable especially for people in developing countries.<br />

Sinopsis<br />

PCR (REAKCIJA POLIMERIZACIJE LANCA) U DETEKCIJI<br />

Chlamydia trachomatis I DRUGE METODE – UPOREDNA<br />

ISTRAŽIVANJA<br />

Metode bazirane na reakciji polimerizacije lanca (PCR) su<br />

najsavremenije metode za detekciju Chlamydia trachomatis. Postoje<br />

različiti testovi za detekciju C. trachomatis. Mnogi ljudi, uključujući<br />

specijaliste, nisu upoznati sa pouzdanošću testova, pa je jedan<br />

uporedni pregled važan za prevazilaženje ovog problema.<br />

Nedostatak osetljivosti, specifičnosti, ili oboje, osetljivosti i<br />

specifičnosti, i neke druge mane su česti problemi vezani za ove<br />

testove. Ipak, ni jedan od tih problema nije prisutan kod metoda<br />

baziranih na reakciji polimerizacije lanca. To su najbolje metode za<br />

detekciju C. trachomatis, koje daju najpouzdanije rezultate. Uzorci<br />

mogu biti obrađeni za samo 5-6 časova. Mana metoda baziranih na<br />

PCR-u je visoka cijena i visoka tehnologija koje su uzrok<br />

nedostupnosti metode, naročito za ljude u zemljama u razvoju.


132<br />

Natura Montenegrina, 6/2007<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

Diseases caused by bacterium Chlamydia trachomatis are pretty common<br />

worldwide. Actually, it is one of the most common sexually transmitted diseases. In<br />

2005, according to statistics, 976,445 C. trachomatis diagnoses were reported (up<br />

from 929,462 in 2004) in the USA. However, most of C. trachomatis cases remain<br />

undiagnosed and it is estimated that there are 2.8 million new cases annually<br />

(Weinstock et al., 2004). Direct and indirect costs of cure of the disease exceed 2.4<br />

billion US dollars annually (Washington and Katz, 2000). Increase in cases is probably<br />

partially caused by advance in diagnostic laboratory tests. C. trachomatis is an<br />

intracellular bacterium and cannot be grown on agar plates. The infectious,<br />

extracellular form is an elementary body, typically 0.2-0.6 μm in diameter. Elementary<br />

bodies that have been endocytosed by eukaryotic cells typically remain in vacuolar<br />

inclusions and transform into reticulate bodies. Reticulate bodies range up to 1.5 μm.<br />

If untreated, chlamydial infections can progress to serious reproductive and other<br />

health problems with both short-term and long-term consequences. One of the main<br />

reasons that this disease is very common is the fact that it is mostly asymptomatic<br />

(Stamm, 1999). An asymptomatic disease can be diagnosed only by laboratory tests<br />

because of lack of symptoms. This is the reason that efficient cure and eradication of<br />

the disease is possible only if laboratory tests are highly reliable.<br />

A COMPARATIVE SURVEY OF METHODS<br />

There are several basic methods in laboratory detection of C. trachomatis.<br />

They have various specificities, and all of them (except PCR) have low sensitivity or<br />

cannot be efficiently applied for large scale analyses. In the case of asymptomatic<br />

diseases, which can be diagnosed only with a laboratory test, low sensitivity of the<br />

test is unacceptable. A survey of sensitivity of basic methods for detection of C.<br />

trachomatis is given in table 1 (Ossewaarde, 1995).<br />

DIAGNOSTIC METHOD<br />

SENSITIVITY (PERCENT)<br />

PCR 90-100%<br />

Cell Culture (McCoy) 60-80%<br />

Fluorescent Microscopy with Fluorescent 55-75%<br />

Antibodies<br />

ELISA 50-70%<br />

Hybridization with DNK Probes 50-70%<br />

Fast Tests 40-60%<br />

Table 1. Basic methods used in laboratory diagnostics of C. Trachomatis<br />

and their diagnostic sensitivity.


133<br />

Obradović: PCR (Polymerase Chain Reaction) in Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis . . .<br />

Cell culture. Analysis in cell culture of McCoy cell line is one of methods for<br />

detection of C. trachomatis (Black, 1997). Its sensitivity is 60-80% and it takes 4-7<br />

days. Disadvantage of this method is that is not suitable for large scale application.<br />

Maintenance of cell culture is expensive and labor and time consuming. Sterile<br />

conditions are essential for cell culture and contamination is a very common problem<br />

especially in case of processing of many samples. Thus cell culture is not suitable for<br />

routine laboratory diagnostics. Actually, the relatively low sensitivity, long turnaround<br />

time, difficulties in standardization, labor intensity, technical complexity, stringent<br />

transport requirements, and relatively high cost are the primary disadvantages of cell<br />

culture isolation of C. trachomatis. This is the reason that this method has not been<br />

applied in large scale diagnostics.<br />

Fluorescent microscopy. Fluorescent microscopy can be with monoclonal and<br />

polyclonal antibodies. Sensitivity and specificity are 55-75% and 85-95% respectively.<br />

People who do analysis have to be well trained and the accuracy of results largely<br />

depends of their experience. If little amount of bacteria and large amount of cells and<br />

cell debris is present in the sample, result cannot be clear and depends of subjective<br />

opinion of person who does the test. This is the reason that this method largely<br />

depends of experience and degree of training, and sensitivity and specificity can be<br />

even lower in case of bad specialist. Actually, well trained specialists and with good<br />

experience are rare. Another disadvantage of this method is possibility of reaction of<br />

applied antibodies with antigens of other species of genus Chlamydia, which would<br />

lead to false positive results. Antibodies available on the market sometimes can react<br />

even with species that do not belong to genus Chlamydia. Monoclonal antibodies are<br />

expensive and polyclonal give worse results.<br />

ELISA. ELISA is another method applied in diagnostics of C. trachomatis. Its<br />

sensitivity is 50-70%. It is often applied in detection of specific antibodies in patients’<br />

blood that are synthesized under influence of C. trachomatis. In primary immune<br />

response first are synthesized antibodies of class IgM, and later IgG and IgA are the<br />

last. In secondary immune response just IgG and IgA are present, and IgM is absent.<br />

Because presence of various antibodies during the infection vary, it is necessary to<br />

perform test with at least 2 classes of antibodies, which additionally increase<br />

expenses. Immunity of a patient can be decreased for various reasons (the other<br />

disease, stress, treatment with immunosuppressors in case of patients with<br />

transplanted organ etc.), which can decrease concentration of antibodies below the<br />

sensitivity threshold of the method and increase amount of false negative results.<br />

Besides, antibodies begin to be synthesized always after an infection, and only after a<br />

given time amount of antibodies is increased above sensitivity threshold of the<br />

method. If concentration of antibodies is below the threshold, diagnostics is not<br />

possible. Very serious problem of this method is the fact that antibodies are present in<br />

the body of healthy patients after a treatment. This test, in this case, would be positive<br />

in spite of the fact that patient is healthy. This is a problem of all indirect methods that


134<br />

Natura Montenegrina, 6/2007<br />

detect presence of specific antibodies instead of causative agent of the disease.<br />

There is ELISA that detects antigens. These antigens are extracted by bacteria into<br />

the environment which can increase possibility to detect them because permanent<br />

extraction increases their concentration in the environment. In this case the method<br />

does not detect bacteria, but antigens that are extracted into environment. ELISA has<br />

the same problems with false positive reactions with bacteria of other species and<br />

genera as fluorescent antibodies methods, because it is based on antibodies, too.<br />

This method should not be used for detection of rectal samples because of increased<br />

reaction with fecal bacteria that can give more false positive results. Reaction of<br />

ELISA antibodies with Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae is often reason of<br />

false positive results (Demaio et al., 1991; Anderson et al., 1993). Some ELISA tests<br />

(which detect presence of lipopolysaccharides of Chlamydia) do not distinguish<br />

species of genus Chlamydia, and positive result does not mean always that detected<br />

bacterium is C. trachomatis. Good characteristics of ELISA tests are high degree of<br />

automation, which made possible employment of low qualified personal, and low cost<br />

of the test. Bad characteristics are low reliability because of low sensitivity and<br />

possible false positive results.<br />

Hybridization with DNA probes. Hybridization with DNA probes is a molecular<br />

biology test. This kind of test is complicated, time and labor consuming, and<br />

expensive. Its sensitivity is just (50-70%) which is substantially less than sensitivity of<br />

the other kind of molecular test (PCR).<br />

Fast tests. This kind of tests is possible to bye in drug stores and patients can<br />

apply it by themselves following directions submitted with the test. Results can be<br />

obtained in 10-15 minutes. They can be based on immunochromatographic or specific<br />

enzyme reaction. They have a low sensitivity (40-60%) and specificity (Suchland et<br />

al., 1997). This kind of tests has just 1 good characteristic which is expressed in their<br />

name – they are fast and simple for application. Thus, they can be applied just for<br />

very rough screening.<br />

Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) based tests. PCR has been discovered by<br />

American scientist Kary Mullis in 1984, and shortly, it became a widely applied method<br />

in scientific research, and as well as in various applications (diagnostic of infectious<br />

and genetic diseases, forensic etc.). Kary Mullis became Nobel Prize winner in 1993<br />

for polymerase chain reaction. PCR based methods are the most advanced tools for<br />

diagnostic of C. trachomatis. It has a number of advantages in comparison to the<br />

other methods.<br />

• High sensitivity is one of the most important characteristics of PCR. PCR is<br />

based on replication (amplification) in vitro of a DNA sequence that is highly<br />

specific for infectious agent. A sequence that is present in a few or even just one<br />

copy can be copied (replicated) to produce a huge amount (thousands of billions


135<br />

Obradović: PCR (Polymerase Chain Reaction) in Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis . . .<br />

copies or even more). Such large amount of DNA molecules can be detected<br />

easily, and this is the main reason that PCR is more sensitive than the other<br />

methods. Analytical sensitivity of PCR is in most cases 1-10 elementary bodies<br />

of C. trachomatis. Sensitivity of fluorescent antibodies microscopy is 10-500<br />

elementary bodies, and ELISA 5000-100 000 elementary bodies (Black, 1997).<br />

Diagnostic sensitivity of PCR based tests for C. trachomatis is 90-100%.<br />

• PCR based methods are direct methods. They directly detect presence of the<br />

bacterium. Many other methods detect specific antibodies, or a product of the<br />

bacterium which is extracted into the environment. PCR based methods detects<br />

a specific DNA which is present in the bacterium.<br />

• High specificity of PCR based methods is possible because they amplify and<br />

detect a sequence highly specific for the bacterium. The sequence can be highly<br />

conservative that makes possible detection of causative agents with high<br />

antigenic changeability. Specificity of PCR based tests for C. trachomatis is<br />

99.6% (Black, 1997).<br />

• PCR methods can process samples in just 5-6 hours and provide highly reliable<br />

results.<br />

• Samples for PCR based methods can be processed from all sources including<br />

noninvasive ones, as urine.<br />

Disadvantages of PCR based methods are high price and complicated<br />

processing of the samples. This makes them unsuitable for large scale screenings.<br />

However, high reliability and other advantages are good compensation for mentioned<br />

disadvantages.<br />

CONCLUSION<br />

Polymerase chain reaction based methods are the most reliable methods for<br />

detection of C. trachomatis infections. Very important characteristics of a laboratory<br />

diagnostics method are sensitivity and specificity. PCR based methods are the most<br />

superior in this sense. They are direct methods based on detection of a DNA<br />

sequence specific for C. trachomatis, which insure that positive result means<br />

presence of the bacterium. These methods make possible processing of samples in<br />

one working day and they can be obtained from all sources including noninvasive,<br />

which make them very suitable for eradication of the disease. In contrast, low<br />

sensitivity of the other methods makes them unsuitable for reliable diagnostics.<br />

However, high expenses and application of high technology makes PCR based<br />

methods less accessible to patients.


136<br />

Natura Montenegrina, 6/2007<br />

REFERENCES<br />

A N D E R S O N , J. R., M U M T A Z , G., M U L H A R E , P., P O D D A R , J. and<br />

R I D G W A Y G. L. 1993: Mandatory Use of Confirmation Stage with<br />

Chlamydiazyme During Urinary Sediment Analysis. - J Clin Pathol 46: 896-897.<br />

B L A C K , C.M. 1997: Current Methods of Laboratory Diagnosis of Chlamydia<br />

trachomatis Infections. - Clinical Microbiology Reviews 10: 160–184<br />

D E M A I O , J., B O Y D , R.S., R E N S I , R. and C L A R K , A. 1991: False-positive<br />

Chlamydiazyme Results During Urine Sediment Analysis due to Bacterial<br />

Urinary Tract Infections. - J Clin Microbiol 29: 1436-8.<br />

O S S E W A A R D E , J. M. 1995: Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology<br />

and Venerology 5: 111-123.<br />

S T A M M , W.E. 1999: Chlamydia trachomatis Infections of the Adult. In: Holmes KK,<br />

Sparling PF, Mardh P-A, et al., eds. Sexually Transmitted Diseases. 3 rd ed. New<br />

York, NY: McGraw-Hill,: 407-22.<br />

SUCHLAND, K.L., COUNTS, J.M. and S T A M M , W.E. (1997): Laboratory<br />

Methods for Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis: Survey of Laboratories in<br />

Washington State. - J Clin Microbiol 35: 3210-4.<br />

W A S H I N G T O N , A.E. and K A T Z , P. 1991: Cost of and Payment Source for Pelvic<br />

Inflammatory Disease. Trends and Projections, 1983 through 2000. - JAMA 266:<br />

2565-9.<br />

W E I N S T O C K , H., B E R M A N , S. and C A T E S , W. Jr. 2004: Sexually<br />

Transmitted Diseases among American Youth: Incidence and Prevalence<br />

Estimates, 2000. - Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health 36: 6-10.<br />

Received: 27.04.2007.


NATURA MONTENEGRINA, PODGORICA, 6:137-149<br />

INFLUENCE OF TRANSGENIC PLANTS ON ENVIRONMENT<br />

Danko OBRADOVIĆ 1<br />

1<br />

University of Montenegro, Faculty of Sciences, Department of Biology, P. O. Box 211, 81000 Podgorica,<br />

Montenegro<br />

Key words:<br />

transgenic plants,<br />

commercial use<br />

Klučne riječi:<br />

transgene biljke,<br />

komercijalna<br />

primena<br />

Synopsis<br />

In 1983, transgenic plants were introduced by four groups<br />

of authors. However, commercial use of transgenic plants dates<br />

from 1996. Since its first application, cultivation area of<br />

transgenic crops around the world has been permanently<br />

increasing. Transferring of a transgene from microorganisms,<br />

animals, and distant plants, transgenic plants can obtain novel<br />

treats that would probably never be introduced by conventional<br />

breeding. New treats that plants can get in nature by<br />

spontaneous mutations and breeding occur slowly. During the<br />

evolution organisms have been accommodated to changes in<br />

their environment, in contrast to revolutionary changes<br />

introduced by molecular biology methods applied on production<br />

of transgenic crops. This can make disbalance among organisms<br />

and cause some ecological problems. Such problems can be<br />

solved by regulations which forbid use of transgenic crops<br />

without vigorous assays for safe application.<br />

Sinopsis<br />

UTICAJ TRANSGENIH BILJAKA NA ŽIVOTNU SREDINU<br />

Četiri grupe autora su 1983. godine po prvi put dobile transgene<br />

biljke. Ipak, komercijalna primena transgenih biljaka datira od 1996.<br />

godine. Od svoje prve primene, obradiva površina pod transgenim<br />

kulturama širom sveta je u stalnom porastu. Transferom nekog gena iz<br />

mikroorganizama, životinja i nesrodnih biljaka, transgene biljke mogu<br />

dobiti nove osobine koje verovatno ne bi nikada dobile konvencionalnim<br />

ukrštanjem. Nova svojstva koja biljke mogu dobiti u prirodi spontanim<br />

mutacijama i ukrštanjem događaju se sporo. U toku evolucije organizmi<br />

su se prilagođavali na promene u njihovoj okolini za razliku od<br />

revolucionarnih promena koje su uvele metode molekularne biologije<br />

primenjene u proizvodnji transgenih kultura. Ovo može dovesti do<br />

disbalansa među organizmima i uzrokovati neke ekološke probleme.<br />

Takvi problemi mogu biti rešeni propisima koji zabranjuju primenu<br />

transgenih biljaka bez prethodne temeljne provere bezbednosti primene.


138<br />

Natura Montenegrina, 6/2007<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

Plant breeding has been a basic method for obtaining plants of particular traits<br />

for several thousand years. People have used this method to improve some<br />

characteristics of plants (sweeter and larger fruits, aridity and disease resistance,<br />

faster growth) in spite of the fact that they did not understand breeding process and<br />

its background. In 1865, Gregor Mendel showed that the inheritance of traits follows<br />

particular regularities, but the significance of Mendel's work was not recognized until<br />

1900. Traditional plant breeding is very difficult and time and labor consuming<br />

process. By artificial plant crossing, plant breeders try to obtain plants of desirable<br />

traits. To achieve this goal, they have to travel all around the world to find plants of<br />

particular traits that are suitable for breeding. Variations of treats among plants arise<br />

as result of mutations. However, these mutations, and as well as variations, are of<br />

limited number. In 1926, Hermann Joseph Muller found that X-rays irradiation can<br />

induce mutations (in 1946 he was awarded Nobel Prize for this discovery) (M u l l e r ,<br />

1926). After this discovery, it was found out that irradiation of seed can greatly<br />

increase amount of mutations in next generation. Since the end of World War II,<br />

induced mutation have been widely applied in plant breeding. Such method was<br />

named mutation breeding. Mutations, and thus, variations of traits, can be induced<br />

with ionizing radiation (X-rays, gamma rays, alpha particles, beta particles, neutrons,<br />

protons) or chemical agents (sodium azide, ethyl methanesulphonate). This is a way<br />

to increase variability and to get plants of desirable traits that are not available in<br />

nature. This method is named mutation breading. It became popular after World War<br />

II, and it is popular at the present time as well.<br />

Classical plant breeding uses deliberate interbreeding of closely or distantly<br />

related species to produce new crops with desirable properties. Breeding is possible<br />

between plants within the same species, genus and, less commonly, between plants<br />

of different genera. Plants that are evolutionally distant have larger amount of different<br />

properties. Thus, amount of plant property variations that are available for breeding<br />

and obtaining of new crops is limited, because breeding between plants that are<br />

evolutionally distant is not possible. Even application of mutation breading produces<br />

new crops with limited variations in treats. Additionally, induced mutations which are<br />

obtained by mutation breeding produce new treats that cannot be predicted, because<br />

mutations are random events. All these features of classical and mutation breeding<br />

limit their application.<br />

In 1983, four groups of authors, almost simultaneously, introduced a novel<br />

method for production of new crops. They worked independently, and three of them<br />

announced their work at a conference in Miami, USA in January 1983 (Framond et al.,<br />

1983; Schell et al., 1983; Fraley et al., 1983). Their researches enable gene transfer<br />

from bacteria into plants. These works were published in scientific journals as well<br />

(B e v a n , et al. 1983; H e r r e r a - E s t r e l l a et al., 1983; F r a l e y et al., 1983). The<br />

fourth had transferred a plant gene from one species into another species. They<br />

announced their research at a conference in Los Angeles, USA, in April 1983, and


139<br />

Obradović: INFLUENCE OF TRANSGENIC PLANTS ON ENVIRONMENT<br />

later it was published in a journal (M u r a i et al., 1983). Plants obtained this way are<br />

transgenic plants. This method enables gene insertion of one or more genes from a<br />

plant which can be evolutionally very distant into another plant. The genes can be<br />

transferred from any organism (animals, bacteria, viruses etc.) into a plant. This<br />

makes possible production of novel crops with new treats which in practice can never<br />

be obtained by breeding. Very important feature of this method is possibility to predict<br />

novel treats of transgenic crops. It enables to skip millions of years of evolution that<br />

would be necessary for nature to produce plants with so different treats. This skip<br />

made impossible accommodation between transgenic crops and environment, and<br />

develops concerns regarding the application of transgenic plants. However, transgenic<br />

plants can provide substantial benefits: better nutritional characteristics, increased<br />

productivity, longer shelf life, environmental tolerance, pest and disease resistance,<br />

etc.<br />

Production Process of Transgenic Plants<br />

Molecular biology methods enable gene transfer and production of transgenic<br />

plants. These methods are commonly named genetic engineering. Actually, all<br />

molecular biology methods that can be involved as tools for changing of genetic<br />

constitution are named genetic engineering. Production of transgenic plants consists<br />

of: isolation of a gene from donor organism, insertion of the gene into plant cell,<br />

obtaining of whole plants from transformed cells grown in tissue culture, plant<br />

breeding and testing.<br />

Isolation of a Gene from a Donor Organism. This is the most difficult step in<br />

production of transgenic plants. This step is mostly based on fundamental research in<br />

determination of structure and function of donor organism genes. It is very important<br />

to locate and determine the role of a gene, its function and treats that the gene is<br />

responsible for. Identification of expression mechanisms of the gene and its influence<br />

on other genes, metabolic pathways of gene products is very important. Procedure of<br />

this step depends very much on results of such researches. In contrast to this step, all<br />

other steps are processed under well determined procedures. Isolated gene that is to<br />

be inserted into a plant is termed transgene.<br />

Insertion of the Gene into Plant Cells. Currently, there are two types of<br />

vehicles which can be used for gene insertion into plants. The most often used vehicle<br />

is Agrobacterium tumefaciens (Figure 1). A. tumefaciens is a gram negative, rod<br />

shaped, bacteria, which is the causal agent of Crown Gall disease (the formation of<br />

tumors) of dicots. It has been used as gene transfer vehicle into dicots, and just<br />

recently into monocots. A. tumefaciens contains chromosomal DNA and plasmid<br />

(known as the Ti-plasmid for tumor-inducing plasmid). In order to be virulent the<br />

bacterial Ti-plasmid has to contain a small segment of DNA termed T-DNA<br />

(transferred DNA), and vir (virulence) genes that direct the infection process. A.


140<br />

Natura Montenegrina, 6/2007<br />

tumefaciens are attracted to wound sites of a plant by chemotaxis. This is a response<br />

to the release of some common root components (sugars and particularly phenolic<br />

compounds such as acetosyringone). Acetosyringone activates vir genes on the Tiplasmid.<br />

Activity of this gene leads to the production of opine permease, that is<br />

inserted in the bacterial cell membrane for uptake of compounds (opines) that will be<br />

produced by the tumors, and production of an enzyme restriction endonuclease that<br />

excises part of the Ti-plasmid termed the T-DNA. Excised T-DNA released by the<br />

bacterium enters the plant cells and in an unknown way integrates into the<br />

chromosome. T-DNA dictates change in the functioning of those cells which cause<br />

formation of tumors.<br />

Figure 1. Simplified organization of a sequence constructed for insertion into a plant genome.<br />

Insertion of a transgene into plant cell genome does not mean that the gene will<br />

be expressed. Unexpressed gene will not code any product (protein), and thus, will<br />

not provide any new treat to the plant. In order to provide gene expression a promoter<br />

DNA sequence has to be inserted together with the gene, and as well as a termination<br />

sequence (terminator). Terminator signals that gene coding sequences ends, and that<br />

transcription of the DNA has to be ended. A given promoter and terminator can be<br />

combined with various genes (Figure 2). The degree of gene expression, the region of<br />

plant body where the gene will be expressed, and the plant life cycle stage depend on<br />

which promoter is applied.<br />

A marker gene has to be inserted together with the transgene. It is necessary for<br />

selection of cells which received and expressed a transgene. It encodes a protein<br />

which provides resistance to an agent (usually antibiotics or herbicides) which is toxic<br />

to plant cells. Thus, cells that received transgene will be resistant to the toxic agent<br />

(they will survive), and all other cells will die.<br />

Figure 2. Bacterium Agrobacterium tumefaciens.


141<br />

Obradović: INFLUENCE OF TRANSGENIC PLANTS ON ENVIRONMENT<br />

Ti-plasmid used in gene transfer process is not a wild type plasmid, but plasmid<br />

especially constructed for this purpose. T-DNA sequence which causes tumor growth<br />

is deleted and just its border sequence is retained. A. tumefaciens with such Tiplasmid<br />

is not a pathogen. It retains ability to insert the plasmid into the cell, but the<br />

plasmid cannot cause tumor growth. Transgene is to be inserted into the Ti-plasmid,<br />

instead of removed T-DNA sequence and transferred into a plant cell. The cell is<br />

maintained in tissue culture and transgene is incorporated into the plant chromosome.<br />

The cells in tissue culture are grown in media containing nutrients and hormones<br />

necessary for cell growth.<br />

Obtaining of Whole Plants from Transformed Cells Grown in Tissue<br />

Culture. After the treatment with A. tumefaciens, it is necessary to select transformed<br />

cells. The selection is carried out by replacement of standard media with selectable<br />

media, which contain an agent (usually antibiotic or herbicide) toxic for the cells.<br />

Marker gene inserted into plant chromosome together with the transgene provides<br />

resistance to the toxic agent. Thus, the cells that received marker gene will survive in<br />

the tissue culture, and all other will die. Survived cells will be maintained to produce<br />

an embryo and eventually whole plant.<br />

Plant Breeding and Testing. A limited number of plant lines is possible to use<br />

in effective gene transfer. They are usually not elite lines. To obtain an elite line with a<br />

transgene it is necessary to breed transgenic plant with an elite line. After the<br />

breeding process, a transgenic plant containing at least 98% of elite genes is<br />

produced. The next step is testing of the plant (expression of transgene, stability of<br />

inheritance of the treats, unexpected features of the plant etc.).<br />

Another method for insertion of a transgene is the gene gun. All steps in<br />

production of transgenic plants applying gene gun are pretty much the same as with<br />

A. tumefaciens, except gene insertion. Gene gun method applies microscopic gold<br />

particles to deliver a transgene into the plant cell nucleus. Golden particles coated<br />

with a large amount of transgenes together with a marker gene are accelerated with<br />

air pressure and shoot at tissue culture cells. The golden particles will pass into the<br />

cell nucleus. Coated DNA will be dissolved and inserted into the chromosome. The<br />

method with A. tumefaciens is more effective than gene gun method, but it cannot be<br />

applied to every plant species. A. tumefaciens is ussualy applied with dicots, and<br />

gene gun with monocots.<br />

Transgenic Plants Benefits<br />

New treats introduced by insertion of transgenes into plants can provide a<br />

number of benefits: pest and disease resistance, herbicide tolerance, better nutritional<br />

characteristics, increased productivity, longer shelf life, environmental tolerance, etc.


142<br />

Natura Montenegrina, 6/2007<br />

Pest and Disease Resistance. Insertion of a transgene (isolated from a soil<br />

bacterium Bacillus thuringiensis) coding a crystalline (Cry) protein can introduce pest<br />

resistance to transgenic plants. In the intestine gut, the protein is broken down to<br />

release delta-endotoxin that creates pores in the intestinal lining of pets. This creates<br />

ion imbalance, dysfunction of digestive system, and death of the insect in a few days.<br />

Product of Cry gene is considered safe for human and birds, and less harmful for nontarget<br />

insects than other insecticides. Insecticides based on Cry gene have been used<br />

for long time, but in this case they are produced by plant in the plant body. Thus,<br />

insects eating such plant will eventually die. Plants containing this transgene are<br />

named Bt (Bacillus thuringiensis) plants. Bt plants available by now are: Bt cotton (to<br />

control European corn borer, Southwestern corn borer, and corn earworm), Bt cotton<br />

(to control cotton bollworm and tobacco budworm), and Bt potato (to control Colorado<br />

potato beetle). Bt plants can decrease application of insecticides, and so, the<br />

surrounding environment is no longer exposed to large amounts of harmful insecticide.<br />

Time and labor saving is achieved too.<br />

Transgenic papaya and squash carrying virus coat protein gene are resistant<br />

to virus. This gene produces virus coat protein before an infection. After the infection,<br />

plant cells will not produce this protein because of co-suppression (plant cell<br />

mechanism which suppresses production of the viral protein), and virus cannot<br />

replicate.<br />

Herbicide Tolerance. Weeds can significantly decrease crop yield, and so<br />

herbicides are widely applied for weed control. Sometimes farmers apply more than<br />

one herbicide because they are specific for a particular weed, and they are applied at<br />

particular growth stage. Herbicides are long lasting and can persist in the soil for<br />

years. Transgenic herbicide tolerant plants have a transgene providing resistance to<br />

new herbicide that can kill all kinds of plants (including weeds). These herbicides<br />

break down in the soil quickly. So far, there are two herbicides that are used with<br />

herbicide tolerant plants: Liberty (glufosinate) and Roundup (glyphosate). These<br />

herbicides break down quickly in contrast to conventional herbicides that can remain<br />

in the soil for more than a year, and thus prevent farmers to plant crops sensitive to<br />

them in future. Fast degradation of these new herbicides protects environment of large<br />

scale contamination, which can be common in the case of conventional herbicides. An<br />

example of transgenic herbicide tolerant plant is Roundup Ready soybean.<br />

Long-Lasting Products. Some plants (strawberries, tomatoes, pineapples,<br />

sweet peppers and bananas) are genetically modified to produce less enzyme that<br />

cause products to rot. These plants can remain firm and fresh for long time. The first<br />

long-lasting plant modified plants was tomato, which came on the market in 1994.<br />

Such tomato can tolerate a longer transport time and it can be allowed to ripen in the<br />

sun before picking - resulting in a better tasting tomato.


143<br />

Obradović: INFLUENCE OF TRANSGENIC PLANTS ON ENVIRONMENT<br />

Improvements of nutritious characteristics of the plants. Nutritious<br />

characteristics of a plant can be improved by inserting a transgene. An example is<br />

golden rice. It contains beta-carotene which is converted into vitamin A in the body.<br />

For the golden rice to make beta-carotene three new genes are implanted: two from<br />

daffodils and the third from a bacterium.<br />

Transgenic Plants Risks and Concerns<br />

Transgenic plants can provide many benefits, but in the same time some risks<br />

and concerns. Insertion of transgenes into plants, which introduces novel treats to the<br />

plants, can change interactions among plants and animals. This can cause ecological<br />

and other kinds of problems.<br />

Gene Transfer from Transgenic Crops to Their Wild Relatives. Many crops<br />

have wild relatives which can be crossed by pollination. Thus, there is real danger of<br />

gene transfer from crops to wild population including weeds (K a i s e r , 2001; P o p p y<br />

and W i l k i n s o n , 2005). This possibility is supported by researches. Wild population<br />

would receive novel treats that can make them resistant to many factors. This is<br />

especially critical for weeds. Weeds resistant for herbicides, plant diseases, climatic<br />

factors etc. would be a nightmare for every farmer. Transgene transfer to wild<br />

relatives that are not weeds is not desirable either, because this could change natural<br />

balance in the wild nature and cause ecological problems.<br />

Crop to Crop Gene Flow. Gene transfer is possible from transgenic to<br />

conventional crops (H a l l et al., 2000; R i t a l a e t al., 2002).The transfer is processed<br />

by pollination, and pollen can be carried by wind and insects. After this gene flow,<br />

farmers that plant conventional crops will have transgenic even if they dislike them.<br />

Long-term application of transgenic crops and gene flow can lead even to complete<br />

loss of conventional crops. This is the most likely to occur in the case of highly<br />

outcrossing plants in contrast to highly self-pollinating plants.<br />

Antibiotic resistance. All transgenic crops in the process of their production<br />

have to contain a marker gene which is inserted to insure that a transgene has been<br />

inserted into the plant. It is usually an antibiotic resistance gene. There is a concern<br />

that bacteria, which inhabit intestine of human and animals, could be transformed by<br />

transfer of a DNA fragment carrying the antibiotic resistance gene from the intestine<br />

into the bacterial cell. After such transformation, bacteria would become resistant to a<br />

given antibiotic. This could lead to increase of amount of antibiotic resistant bacterial<br />

strains in the nature, and would cause problems in human and animal medical<br />

treatment. However, application of new markers that do not represent antibiotic<br />

resistance genes would resolve this problem. An example of such markers is green<br />

fluorescent protein and mannose (Joersbo et al., 1998). Another way to resolve this


144<br />

Natura Montenegrina, 6/2007<br />

problem is to remove the marker after the development of transgenic plant, when its<br />

presence is not required any more (Zuo, 2001). Transgenic plants with green<br />

fluorescent protein as a marker and with removed markers are already submitted for<br />

authorization and their large scale production can be expected soon.<br />

Allergenicity. Insertion of a transgene into a plant can cause production of a<br />

product which is an allergen. This allergen will cause allergic reaction, which can be<br />

fatal to persons who consume such plants and are allergic. Some plants do not<br />

contain any allergen, but insertion of a transgene which produces them can cause<br />

health problem and even death of people who are allergic. Allergic people who do not<br />

know that a transgenic plant contains a given allergen can be in great danger. An<br />

example is transgenic soybean with inserted gene from Brazil nut (Nordlee et al.,<br />

1996). The gene was inserted to improve nutritional characteristics of soybean, but<br />

people who were allergic to Brazil nut were allergic to mentioned transgenic soybean<br />

too. This soybean has never been approved for market application. Now, all<br />

transgenic plants are tested for allergens to solve this problem.<br />

Terminator Technology. In 1990s U.S. Department of Agriculture and Delta<br />

and Pine Land Company developed a method for protection of technology. The goal of<br />

this method is to force farmers to pay intellectual property for development of<br />

transgenic plants. Actually, many farmers all over the world save some seeds to plant<br />

next year. If they buy transgenic seeds from a company developer of the transgenic<br />

plant once, they do not have to buy it anymore because they can produce transgenic<br />

seeds by themselves, saving some of the seeds in next generation. In 1998,<br />

developers of mentioned method were awarded a joint patent. The method is named<br />

Technology Protection System (TPS). TPS makes possible production of seeds which<br />

is sterile in the second generation. Seeds obtained after first generation is good for<br />

consumption, but plant embryo is killed by TPS, making seed unsuitable for planting.<br />

Thus, if farmers want to plant transgenic plants, they have to buy seeds from company<br />

developer of the seed.<br />

Advantage of this technology is that plant pollinated with transgenic plants will<br />

be sterile as well, and it will prevent gene flow from transgenic plant to the other<br />

plants. Another advantage is that this will encourage biotech companies for further<br />

development of transgenic plants with novel treats, especially those that are not so<br />

profitable for them.<br />

Disadvantage is that some farmers, especially small and farmers in developing<br />

countries, will not be able to buy seeds every season. That would increase cost of the<br />

production, and it can lead to their bankruptcy in competition with large<br />

manufacturers. Another disadvantage is that neighboring non-transgenic crops and<br />

wild plants would be affected, because after possible pollination their seeds would be<br />

sterile and it could cause lower yield. This impact would be higher on non-transgenic<br />

crops than on wild plants.


145<br />

Obradović: INFLUENCE OF TRANSGENIC PLANTS ON ENVIRONMENT<br />

There is another system for protection of technology named Trait-specific<br />

Genetic Use Restriction Technology or T-Gurt. It was developed by agro-chemical<br />

companies including Monsanto and AstraZeneca. T-Gurt does not cause production of<br />

sterile seeds. The seeds in next generation would not express transgenes. However, if<br />

seeds are sprayed with a chemical, sold solely by the manufacturer of seeds, the<br />

transgene would be expressed.<br />

Benefits of this technology are that transgenes would not be expressed in the<br />

wild plants, and farmers can plant seeds obtained in the next generation (but without<br />

expression of transgenes if they do not buy the chemicals). Disadvantages are that<br />

transgenes would be transferred by pollination to the neighboring population (crops<br />

and wild plants) in spite the fact that it will not be expressed and spraying of the seed<br />

with the chemicals can make negative impact on environment.<br />

A new sophisticated system for protection of technology which produces sterile<br />

seeds is under development. This seed becomes fertile if it is sprayed with a chemical<br />

sold by company developer of the transgenic plant.<br />

None of terminator technologies has been applied yet. A great resistance to its<br />

application given by farmers all around the world is one of the reasons for delaying of<br />

the application. However, it is hard to believe that large agro-chemical companies will<br />

quit these projects which can enable them to make additional large scale profit.<br />

Production of Transgenic Crops around the World<br />

In 1996, the first transgenic crops were planted in the USA for commercial use.<br />

Cultivation of transgenic crops has shown permanent increase (Figure 3) according to<br />

ISAAA (ISAAA, 2006). In 2006, they were grown on 102 million hectares worldwide.<br />

The increase has been observed in both, industrial and developing countries. The<br />

USA is the country with the largest area planted with transgenic crops. European<br />

countries do not plant large areas with transgenic plants, and their amounts are<br />

modest in comparison to some other countries (table 1). In 2006, the most often<br />

planted transgenic crops around the world were: soybean (58.6 million hectares),<br />

maize (25.2 million hectares), cotton (13.4 million hectares), canola (4.8 million<br />

hectares).


146<br />

Natura Montenegrina, 6/2007<br />

Figure 3. Global area of transgenic plants in<br />

million hectares (1996-2006).<br />

COUNTRY<br />

CULTIVATION<br />

AREAS<br />

TRANSGENIC PLANTS<br />

USA 54,6 S,M,C,R, Squash, Papaya,<br />

Alfalfa<br />

Argentina 18,0 S,M,C<br />

Brazil 11,5 S, C<br />

Canada 6,1 R,M,S<br />

India 3,8 C<br />

China 3,5 C<br />

Paraguay 2,0 S<br />

South Africa 1,4 M,S,C<br />

Uruguay 0,4 S,M<br />

Philippines 0,2 M<br />

Australia 0,2 C<br />

<strong>Rom</strong>ania 0,1 S<br />

Mexico 0,1 C,S<br />

Spain 0,1 M<br />

Colombia


147<br />

Obradović: INFLUENCE OF TRANSGENIC PLANTS ON ENVIRONMENT<br />

CONCLUSION<br />

There are many contradictory opinions in connection with transgenic plants.<br />

Even experts in that field do not have common opinion. Some experts have opinion<br />

that application of transgenic plants can be very dangerous for environment and<br />

human health. The others have opinion that risks are overestimated, and that future is<br />

in transgenic plants. Actually, probably both groups of experts are right. Application of<br />

transgenic plants without appropriate regulations can be very risky. The new<br />

transgenes inserted into them, and novel treats, can disturb harmony among<br />

organisms that has been built by nature for many millions of years. This<br />

disorganization of an ecosystem is not predictable and cannot be always prevented.<br />

Restoring of the consequences could be very difficult and probably in majority of the<br />

cases impossible. Transgenes that are accidentally transferred to the other plants,<br />

including wild environment, will stay there forever. However, application of transgenic<br />

plants can increase agricultural production, decrease cost of products and save<br />

environment by decreasing amount of applied chemicals (or by application of safer<br />

chemicals). Transgenic plant can be resistant to various plant diseases and<br />

environmental conditions which can make them very suitable for agricultural<br />

production. The problems caused by introduction of transgenes cannot be solved by<br />

nature, or to be more accurate, nature would need very long time to do that with<br />

dangerous consequences. Thus, only solution is to prevent all known problems and to<br />

begin with application of transgenic plants with precautions. Regulations, which would<br />

prevent large scale application without preliminary assays and approval, are<br />

necessary at national and as well as international levels.<br />

Contemporary obtained improvements obtained by transgenic technology are<br />

very modest in comparison to benefits that will be in the future. Now, we enjoy y just<br />

novice movements in this field. Benefits in the future will be so huge that agricultural<br />

production without transgenic plants can be compared to transportation with animaldrawn<br />

vehicles.<br />

LITERATURE<br />

BEVAN, M.W., FLAVELL, R.B. and C H I L T O N M.D. 1983: A Chimaeric<br />

Antibiotic Resistance Gene as a Selectable Marker for Plant Cell<br />

Transformation. - Nature 304: 184-187.<br />

F R A L E Y , R.T., R O G E R S , S.B. and H O R S C H . R.B. 1983: Use of a Chimeric<br />

Gene to Confer Antibiotic Resistance to Plant Cells. - Advances in Gene<br />

Technology: Molecular Genetics of Plants and Animals. Miami Winter Symposia<br />

Vol. 20: 211-221.<br />

F R A L E Y , R.T., R O G E R S , S.G., H O R S C H , R.B., S A N D E R S , P.R., F L I C K ,<br />

J.S., A D A M S , S.P., B I T T N E R , M.L., B R A N D , L.A., F I N K , C.L., F R Y ,


148<br />

Natura Montenegrina, 6/2007<br />

J.S., G A L L U P P I , G.R., G O L D B E R G , S.B. H O F F M A N N , N.L. and<br />

W O O , S.C. 1983: Expression of Bacterial Genes in Plant Cells. - Proceedings<br />

of the National Academy of Sciences 80: 4803-4807.<br />

FRAMOND, A.J., BEVAN, M.W., BARTON, K.A., FLAVELL, F. and<br />

C H I L T O N , M.D. 1983: Mini-Ti Plasmid and a Chimeric Gene Construct: New<br />

Approaches to Plant Gene Vector Construction. - Advances in Gene Technology:<br />

Molecular Genetics of Plants and Animals. Miami Winter Symposia Vol 20: 159-<br />

170.<br />

H A L L , L., T O P I N K A , K., H U F F M A N , J., and D A V I S , L. 2000: Pollen Flow<br />

between Herbicide-resistant Brassica napus Is the Cause of Multiple-resistant B.<br />

napus Volunteers. - Weed Science 48: 688-694.<br />

HERRERA-ESTRELLA, L., DEPICKER, A., Van MONTAGU, M. and<br />

S C H E L L , J. 1983. Expression of Chimaeric Genes Transfered into Plant Cells<br />

Using a Ti-plasmid-derived Vector. - Nature 303: 209-213.<br />

ISAAA (The International Service for the Acquisition of Agri-biotech Applications)<br />

Briefs (2006) 35.<br />

JOERSBO, M., DONALDSON, I., KREIBERG, J., PETERSEN, S.G.,<br />

B R U N S T E D T , J. and O K K E L S , F.T. (1998): Analysis of Mannose<br />

Selection Used for Transformation of Sugar Beet. Molecular Breeding 4: 111-<br />

117.<br />

K A I S E R , J. 2001: Breeding a Hardier Weed. - Science 293: 1425-1426.<br />

M U L L E R , H.J. 1926: The Problem of Genetic Modification. Fifth International<br />

Congress of Genetics. Berlin.<br />

M U R A I , N., S U T T O N , D.W., M U R R A Y , M.G., S L I G H T O M , J.L., M E R L O ,<br />

D.J., REICHERT, N.A., SENGUPTA-GOPALAN, C., STOCK, C.A.,<br />

B A R K E R , R.F., K E M P , J.D. and H A L L ., T.C. 1983: Phaseolin Gene from<br />

Bean Is Expressed after Transfer to Sunflower via Tumor-inducing Plasmid<br />

Vectors. - Science 222: 476-482.<br />

NORDLEE, J.A., TAYLOR, S.L., TOWNSEND, J.A., THOMAS, L.A. and<br />

B U S H , R.K. 1996: Identification of a Brazil-nut Allergen in Transgenic<br />

Soybeans. - New England Journal of Medicine 334: 688-692.<br />

POPPY, G.M. and W I L K I N S O N M.J. 2005: Gene Flow from GM Plants. -<br />

Blackwell Publishing.<br />

RITALA, A., NUUTILA, A.M., AIKASALO, R., KAUPPINEN, V. and<br />

T A M M I S O L A , J. 2002: Measuring Gene Flow in the Cultivation of Transgenic<br />

Barley. Crop Science 42: 278-285.<br />

SCHELL, J., Van MONTAGU, M., HOLSTERS, M., ZAMBRYSKI, P.,<br />

J O O S , H., I N Z E , D., H E R R E R A - E S T R E L L A , L., D E P I C K E R , A., D e


149<br />

Obradović: INFLUENCE OF TRANSGENIC PLANTS ON ENVIRONMENT<br />

BLOCK, M., CAPLAN, A., DHAESE, P., Van HAUTE, E.,<br />

HERNALSTEENS, J-P., De GREVE, H., LEEMANS, J.,<br />

DEBLAERE, R., WILLMITZER, L., SCHRODER, J. and<br />

O T T E N , L . 1983: Ti Plasmids as Experimental Gene Vectors for Plants.<br />

Advances in Gene Technology: Molecular Genetics of Plants and Animals. -<br />

Miami Winter Symposia Vol. 20: 191-209.<br />

Z U O , J., N I U , Q.W., M O L L E R , S.G. and C H U A , N.H. 2001: Chemical-regulated,<br />

Site-specific DNA Excision in Transgenic Plants. - Nature Biotechnology 19:<br />

157-161.<br />

Received: 27.04.2007.


150<br />

Natura Montenegrina, 6/2007


NATURA MONTENEGRINA, PODGORICA, 6:151-152<br />

Caldesia parnassifolia (L.) P a r l NEW SPECIES IN MONTENEGRIN FLORA<br />

Vera BIBERDŽIĆ 1<br />

1 Natural History Museum of Montenegro, Trg Vojvode Bećir Bega Osmanagića 16,<br />

81000 Podgorica, Montenegro, E-mail: pr<strong>muzej</strong>@cg.yu<br />

During macrophyta research of Skadar Lake and its surroundings, the species<br />

Caldesia parnassifolia (L.) Parl was found, representing the first finding of this taxon<br />

in Montenegro. A very small population of floating leaves was found at the locality<br />

called Pančeva oka.<br />

Caldesia parnassifolia (L.) Parl represents the remainder of the tertiary<br />

hydrophyte flora in our country and in the Balkan Peninsula. In phylogenetic respect, it<br />

is most similar to Alisma genus, which is characterized by a cosmopolitan distribution.<br />

Pollination is entomophilic, and the dispersal of seeds is hydrochory i.e. by water. It is<br />

vegetatively propagated via adventitious tree buds, blossoms in July and August. It<br />

belongs to the subtropical flora component.<br />

Genus Caldesia Parl. is represented in the European Flora by one species:<br />

Caldesia parnassifolia (L.) Parl. (T u t i n et al. 1964-1980) and it is generally<br />

distributed in tropical and subtropical regions of Africa, Asia and Australia. In the<br />

temperate zone of Eurasia it is also distributed disjointly: one part of the areal can be<br />

found in Central and Southern Europe (to France to the west, to Ukraine to the east,<br />

to Lithuania to the north and to central Italy to the south) (T u t i n et al 1964-1980,<br />

Vukojič i ć , S., J a n k o v i ć , M. 1999), while the other one involves eastern Asia<br />

(Manchuria, China, Japan).<br />

Prodromus Flore penisulae Balcanicae, Hayek 1932-1933, records that Caldesia<br />

parnassifolia (Bassi) Parl is present in Bosnia and Herzegovina?, Serbia and Bulgaria.<br />

The species has also been recorded in Croatia (N i k o l i ć , T. 2005)<br />

The taxon has been included in the European Red List for Flora. It has also<br />

been included in the List of the Convention on the Conservation of European Wildlife<br />

and Natural Habitats (Bern Convention) and in the List of Species of the Habitats<br />

Directive (Annex IIb, IVb.)<br />

In future research, we will try to find this taxon at other localities as well, to<br />

determine the size of the population and to identify the degree to which it is<br />

endangered in Montenegrin flora.


152<br />

Natura Montenegrina, SHORT COMMUNICATION, 6/2007<br />

LITERATURE<br />

H A Y E K , A. 1932-1933: Prodromus Florae Penisulae Balcanicae. - 3 Fedes Repert.<br />

(Beih) 30.<br />

NIKOLIĆ , T., T O P I Ć J. ur. 2005: Crvena knjiga vaskularne flore Republike<br />

Hrvatske. Kategorije EX,RE,CR,EN i VU. - Ministarstvo kulture, Državni zavod<br />

za zaštitu prirode, Zagreb, 4-695.<br />

TUTIN, T. G., HEYWOOD, V. H., BURGES, N. A. MOORE., VALENTINE,<br />

D. H., WALTERS, S. M., WEBB, D. A. (eds) 1964 - 1980: Flora Europaea 1-<br />

5. - Cambridge University Press.<br />

VUKOJIČ I Ć , S., J A N K O V I Ć , M. 1999: Caldesia parnassifolia (L.) Parl u<br />

Stevanović, V.: Crvena knjiga flore Srbije, 1, Taksoni iščezli iz Srbije. -<br />

Ministarstvo za životnu sredinu Republike Srbije, 57-136.<br />

Received: 08.11.2007.


NATURA MONTENEGRINA, PODGORICA, 6:153-160<br />

ADDITIONS TO THE FLORA OF MONTENEGRO: Setaria verticilliformis Dumort.,<br />

Setaria viridis (L.) PB. subsp. pycnocoma (Steud) Tzvel., Impatiens balsamina L.<br />

AND Catalpa bignoniodes Walt.<br />

Danijela STEŠEVIĆ 1) Nejc J O G A N 2)<br />

1)<br />

Faculty of Science, University of Montenegro, Cetinjski put bb, 81 000 Podgorica, denist@cg.yu<br />

2) Department of Biology BF, University in Ljubljana, Večna pot 111, SI-1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia,<br />

nejc.jogan@bf.uni-lj.si<br />

Setaria verticilliformis Dumort.<br />

According to compilation by R o h l e n a 1942 later amended by P u l e v i ć<br />

2005 in the flora of Montenegro genus Setaria PB. is represented with only 3 species:<br />

Setaria glauca (= Setaria pumila (Poir.) Roem. & Schult.), S. verticillata (L.) PB. and<br />

S. viridis (L.) PB.<br />

Recently, two additional taxa of Setaria have been recorded: S. verticilliformis<br />

Dum. and S. viridis (L.) PB. subsp. pycnocoma (Steud) Tzvel.<br />

The first mentioned species has been recorded in the city area of Podgorica (city<br />

lawns, waste places and roadsides). Using keys in Pignati (1982a) species can be<br />

determined as S. ambigua Guss. Checking additional literature sources (H i t c h o c k<br />

1950, C l a y t o n 1980, W i s s k i r c h e n & H a e u p l e r 1998, M a r t i n č i ć<br />

1999, A e s c h i m a n n et al 2004, F i s c h e r et al 2005,<br />

http://herbarium.usu.edu/treatments/Setaria.htm), we noticed that opinion about<br />

taxonomic status of this taxon differs between authors. According to ITIC (Integrated<br />

Taxonomic Information System - http://itis.gov/) its accepted scientific name is S.<br />

verticilliformis Dumort. Some more important synonyms are listed below:<br />

= Setaria verticillata (L.) PB. var. ambigua (Guss.) Parl.<br />

= Setaria verticillata × viridis<br />

= Setaria ambigua (Guss.) Guss., non Schraeder<br />

= Setaria decipiens Schimp. ex Nyman<br />

= Setaria gussonei Kerg.<br />

S. verticilliformis is thermocosmopolitan species (P i g n a t i 1982a), so we<br />

presume that the reason why it was not reported for the flora of Montenegro up to<br />

now, might be its confusion with similar S. verticillata or S. viridis.<br />

Photos of panicles of these 3 Setaria species, macrodetails of rachis and<br />

bristles, and some distinguishing characters are given below:


154<br />

Natura Montenegrina, SHORT COMMUNICATION, 6/2007<br />

bristles are retroversly scabrous, rachis is retroversly scabrous<br />

bristles are mostly antroversly scabrous, rachis is antroversly scabrous<br />

Photos by: Danijela Stešević<br />

bristles are antroversly scabrous, rachis is hispid and villous


155<br />

Stešević, Jogan: Additions to the flora of Montenegro . . .<br />

Setaria viridis (L.) PB. subsp. pycnocoma (Steud) Tzvelev<br />

Taxonomy of the group of closely related taxa between wild S. viridis on one<br />

side and cultivated S. italica, on the other, is quite blurred. Most probably the reason<br />

for that is, that the wild mentioned species is supposed to be a progenitior of the<br />

cultivated one, so they are morphologically linked by an array of intermediates. Those,<br />

more resembling typical S. viridis are often recognized as S. viridis subsp. pycnocoma<br />

and the ones closer to typical S. italica but still retaining some “wild” character states<br />

as presence of bristles, disarticulating ripe spikelets etc. are called S. italica subsp.<br />

moharia (Alef.) Koern. Main distinguishing characters delimiting mentioned subspecies<br />

of S. viridis are (compiled by Jogan in Martinčič et al. 2007):<br />

- Stem more than 80 cm high (less than 50 (80) cm in type subsp.)<br />

- Panicle lobed and interrupt towards the base, more than (0.8) 1.2 cm wide (vs.<br />

not lobed and up to 0.6 (0.8) cm wide)<br />

- Spikelets (2.2) 2.4-2.6 (2.8) mm long (and only (1.8) 2-2.4 (2.5) mm in subsp.<br />

viridis)<br />

The most important synonyms of S. viridis<br />

subsp. pycnocoma are:<br />

- Setaria viridis (L.) PB. var. major<br />

(Gaudin) Peterm.<br />

- Setaria gigantea (Franch. & Sav.)<br />

Makino<br />

- Setaria pycnocoma (Steud.) Nakai<br />

- Panicum comosum Steud.


156<br />

Natura Montenegrina, SHORT COMMUNICATION, 6/2007<br />

As an obligate segetal weed, S. viridis subsp. pycnocoma, is supposed to be of<br />

a hybrid origin between cultivated and wild growing relatives mentioned above.<br />

Darmency (2005) compiled a “dynamic” model of possible relationship among wild,<br />

weedy, crop and feral forms in the Setaria italica/S. viridis group:<br />

Species Process Resulting Type Conclusion Likelihood<br />

S. viridis Selection by man S. italica Domestication High<br />

S. italica Seed lost at harvest S. italica Volunteerism Very low<br />

S. italica Back mutation S. viridis ssp.<br />

pycnocoma<br />

S. viridis Genetic variability S. viridis ssp.<br />

pycnocoma<br />

S. italica and<br />

S.viridis<br />

Interspecific gene<br />

flow<br />

S. viridis ssp.<br />

pycnocoma<br />

Endoferality<br />

Mimicry<br />

Exoferality<br />

Hyper<br />

rare<br />

Possible<br />

High<br />

In Montenegro, up to now, S. viridis subsp. pycnocoma has been recorded in<br />

Gornji Kokoti (roadside Podgorica – Cetinje), but we can expect its scattered<br />

occurrence also in other lowland parts of the country. Its recent discovery in the<br />

discussed territory (together with the first discovered S. decipiens) showed a need for<br />

taxonomic revision of this genus in the flora of Montenegro.<br />

Impatiens balsamina L. (fam. Balsaminaceae)<br />

In the flora of Montenegro, genus Impatiens L. was present with only one<br />

species - Impatiens noli tangere (R o h l e n a 1942, P u l e v i ć 2005), which is<br />

according to M o o r e (1968) the only Impatiens species native to Europe. All others<br />

are neophytes from Asia and North America (M o o r e 1968, S l a v n i k 1995).<br />

During our field survey undertaken on June 22, 2007, at waste place on Tološko<br />

polje, we have found a few indviduals of unfamiliar Imaptiens, later identified as<br />

Impatiens balsamina (M o o r e 1968, P i g n a t i 1982b). It is annual, up to 1m tall,<br />

with alternate, eliptical to lanceolate-obovate leaves, with serrate margins and 15-20<br />

teeth on each side. Flowers are solitary or in groups up to 3 in leaf axils, pinkish to<br />

purplish to white. Capsula pubescent.


157<br />

Stešević, Jogan: Additions to the flora of Montenegro . . .<br />

Impatiens noli tangere<br />

Impatiens balsamina<br />

Photos by: Danijela Stešević<br />

Impatiens balsamina originates from South East Asia and just after its<br />

introduction to Europe (1542) it stared to spread spontaneously (http://www.bbg.org/<br />

gar2/topics/plants/handbooks/flowers/5b.html).<br />

According to available sources I. balsamina is reported in several European<br />

countries as ephemeral escape from the gardens (Italy, UK, Czech Republic, Austria,<br />

Hungary; P i g n a t i 1982b, C l e m e n t s & F o s t e r 1994, P y š e k et al. 2002, E<br />

s s l & R a b i t s c h 2002, B o t o n d & Z o l t a n 2004), occasionally naturalized<br />

(Austria, France, Italy, Czech Republic, (?)Yugoslavia; M o o r e 1968, G r e t u e r et<br />

al. 1984) or maybe even an invasive alien species in E Europe (http://www.sevin.ru/<br />

invasive/dbases/plants/species.html).<br />

In some other regions of the world, such as in Austral-Pacific region (http://www.<br />

gisp.org/downloadpubs/AP_NATIO.PDF), Pacific islands (http://www.hear.org/pier/reports/<br />

kiribati_appendix1.htm), Micronesia (http://www.hear.org/pier/pdf/kosrae_report.pdf),<br />

Peru (http://i3n.iabin.net/documents/progress_peru_cbd_informe.doc), etc... I. balsamina<br />

has status of invasive species.<br />

Considering the appearance of I. balsamina at Tološko polje, we presume its<br />

seeds were brought here with the waste from nearby gardens, in which it is grown as<br />

an ornamental plant, so in Montenegro it can be only an ephemeral garden escape.


158<br />

Natura Montenegrina, SHORT COMMUNICATION, 6/2007<br />

Catalpa bignonioides Walt. (fam. Bignoniaceae)<br />

Catalpa bignonioides (photo by Danijela Stešević)<br />

Catalpa bignonioides originates from South East part of North America. It is very<br />

decorative deciduous tree, up to 15m high, with rounded to broad crown. Leaves are<br />

opposite, with simple, broadly egg- shaped leaflet up to 30cm long, sometimes with<br />

one or two lateral lobes. Petiole is up to 16cm long. Flowers are big (3-4 cm), white<br />

and two lipped, with two yellow strips in inner part as well as purple spots.<br />

Inflorescence is a panicle. It is flowering in July. It reproduces by seeds and<br />

vegetatively (Š i l i ć 1990).<br />

Common catalpa is deliberately introduced in Europe as an ornamental plant<br />

and as growing wild it is reported for several countries but mostly only as an<br />

ephemeral escape (e.g. Italy, UK, Austria, Czech Republic, Hungary; P i g n a t i<br />

1982b, G r e u t e r et al. 1984, C l e m e n t s & F o s t e r 1994, E s s l & R a b i t s c<br />

h 2002, P y š e k et al. 2002, B o t o n d & Z o l t a n 2004). It may be more<br />

problematic only in Spain (D a n a et al. 2005 reports its weedy occurrence in<br />

Andalucia) and possibly also an invader in some parts of E Europe<br />

(http://www.sevin.ru/invasive/dbases /plants/species.html), but the definition of “invader” in<br />

the sense of that source is not clear-cut.


159<br />

Stešević, Jogan: Additions to the flora of Montenegro . . .<br />

During the field survey undertaken on June 7, 2007 over the city area of<br />

Podgorica, at the left bank of the River Morača - near Botun, we have found a single<br />

individual of common Catalpa. Due to the fact that this species reproduces by seeds,<br />

we presume that the seed is brought by birds or wind from the nearby gardens where<br />

it is planted as ornamental.<br />

LITERATURE<br />

A E S C H I M A N, D., L A U B E R, K., M O E S E R, D.M., T H E Y R I L L A T, J.P. 2004:<br />

Flora Alpina 1, Haupt. 1159 pp.<br />

B O T O N D, M. & Z O L T Á N, B.D. eds. 2004: Biological Invasions in Hungary. Invasive<br />

Plants. - Természet BUVAR Alapítvány Kiadó<br />

C L A Y T O N, (1980): Setaria Beauv, in T u t i n at al. eds. Flora Europaea vol. 5.,<br />

Cambridge, p. 263-264<br />

C L E M E N T, E.J. & F O S T E R, M.C. 1994: Alien Plants of the British Isles. - Botanical<br />

Society of the British Isles, London. 603 pp.<br />

D A N A, E.D., S A N Z, M., V I V A S, S. and S O B R I N O, E. 2005: Especies Vegetales<br />

Invasoras en Andalucía. Junta de Andalucía<br />

D A R M E N C Y H. 2005: Incestuous Relations of Foxtail Millet (Setaria italica) with<br />

Its Parents and Cousins. In: Gressel J (ed) Crop Ferality and Volunteerism. CRC<br />

Press, Boca Raton, pp 81–96<br />

E S S L, F. & R A B I T S C H, W. eds. 2002: Neobiota in Österreich. - Umweltbundesamt<br />

GmbH, Wien. 432 pp.<br />

F I S C H E R, M. A., W. A D L E R & K. O S W A L D, 2005: Exkursionsflora. Österreich,<br />

Liechtenstein, Südtirol. - Biologiezentrum der Oberösterreichischen Landesmuseen,<br />

Linz, 1373 pp.<br />

G R E U T E R, W., B U R D E T, H.M., L O N G, G. eds. 1984: Med-Checklist- Pteridophyta<br />

(ed. 2) Gymnospermae Dicotiledones (Acanthaceae-Cneoraceae), Conservatoire<br />

et jardin botaniques de la Ville de Geneve. 330 pp.<br />

H I T C H C O C K, A. S. 1950: Manual of the Grasses of the United States, 2nd ed.<br />

(Revised by A. Chase.) Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office. 1051 pp.<br />

M A R T I N Č I Č, A., T. W R A B E R, N. J O G A N, A. P O D O B N I K, B. T U R K,<br />

B. V R E Š, V. R A V N I K, B. F R A J M A N, S. S T R G U L C K R A J Š E K,<br />

B. T R Č A K, T. B A Č I Č. M. A. F I S C H E R, K. E L E R & B. S U R I N A,<br />

2007: Mala flora Slovenije. 4. izd. Tehniška založba Slovenije, Ljubljana. 845 pp.<br />

M O O R E, D.M. 1968: Impatiens L, in T u t i n at al. eds. Flora Europaea vol. 2.,<br />

Cambridge, p. 240-241<br />

R O H L E N A, J. 1941-1942: Conspectus Florae Montenegrinae, Preslia 20-21, pp. 506<br />

P I G N A T I, S. 1982a: Flora d’ Italia, vol 3, Edagricole. Bologna. p. 612-613<br />

P I G N A T I, S. 1982b: Flora d’ Italia, vol 2, Edagricole. Bologna. p. 72-73, 618<br />

P U L E V I Ć, V. 2005: Materials for the Vascular Flora of Montenegro, Special <strong>edition</strong><br />

of The Republic Institute for Nature Protection of Montenegro, Podgorica. pp.<br />

218


160<br />

Natura Montenegrina, SHORT COMMUNICATION, 6/2007<br />

S L A V N I K, B. 1995: Rod Impatiens v České republice, Preslia 67: 193–211.<br />

P Y Š E K, P., S A L D O, J. & M A N D A K, B. 2002: Catalogue of Alien Plants of the<br />

Check Republic, Preslia 74: 97-186<br />

Š I L I Ć, Č. 1990: Ukrasno drveće i grmlje, IP “Svjetlost”, Zavod za udžbenike i<br />

nastavna sredstva, Sarajevo - Zavod za udžbenike i nastavna sredstva,<br />

Beograd, 221 pp.<br />

W I S S K I R C H E N, R. & H A E U P L E R, H. 1998: Standardliste der Farn- und<br />

Blütenpflanzen Deutschlands, Stuttgart: Ulmer, 765 pp.<br />

Received: 14.11.2007


NATURA MONTENEGRINA, PODGORICA, 6:161-163<br />

Duchesnea indica (Andr.) Focke, NEW ALIEN SPECIES IN THE FLORA OF<br />

MONTENEGRO<br />

Igor T O M O V I Ć 1) & Danijela STEŠEVIĆ 1) ∗<br />

1) Faculty of Sciences, University of Montenegro, Cetinjski put bb, 81 000 Podgorica, Montenegro<br />

∗ Corresponding author denist@cg.yu<br />

According to two capital papers about the flora of Montenegro R o h l e n a (1942)<br />

& P u l e v i ć (2005) and recently published contributions to the flora of Montenegro<br />

(Stešević 2005, 2006a, 2006b, H a dž i a b l a h o v i ć 2006, etc.), we can conclude<br />

that record of Duchesnea indica (Andr.) Focke in Berane presents its first record for<br />

the flora of Montenegro.<br />

This South East Asian ornamental plant belogs to family Rosaceae. It is<br />

characterized by perennial herbaceous form, with epigeal rooting stolons. Stem is up<br />

to 50cm; leaves are trifoliate, rather long petiolate, with obovate, crenate leaflets and<br />

lanceolate stipules; flowers are yellow, solitary nor or slightly exceeding the leaves;<br />

sepals are 10mm, epicalyx segments broadly ovate, exceeding the sepals; petals 8<br />

mm; receptacle strongly, bright red, tasteless (V a l e n t i n e 1968).<br />

Due to the its ecological preferences (J a c k o w i a k 1992; L a u b e r & W a g n e r<br />

2001) species mostly inhabits relatively moist, nitrophilous and shaded habitats.<br />

At the first sight it looks likes native strawberry. Characters that clearly<br />

distinguish these species are given in table below:<br />

Native strawberry (Fragaria)<br />

Sepals are nearly equal<br />

Flowers are white<br />

Fruits are juicy, sweet and with pleasant<br />

aroma<br />

Indian strawberry (Duchesnea)<br />

Outer sepals are bigger that inner<br />

Flowers are yellow<br />

Fruits are juicy, sour and without aroma<br />

Photos by: Danijela Stešević


162<br />

Natura Montenegrina, SHORT COMMUNICATION, 6/2007<br />

Duchesnea has worldwide distribution. According to W e b e r (2003)<br />

geographical regions where it grows as native are: Northern Europe (Scandinavia:<br />

Finland, Norway, Sweden); British Isles; Central Europe (Austria, Benelux states,<br />

Denmark, France without the Mediterranean border, Germany, Switzerland); Southern<br />

Europe (Southern France, Greece, Italy, Spain); Eastern Europe (all European states<br />

east of Austria, Germany, Italy); European part of Russia, European part of Turkey,<br />

Mediterranean Islands; Northern Africa (Algeria, Egypt, Libya, Morocco); Tropical<br />

Africa (All African states between northern and southern Africa); Southern Africa<br />

(Lesotho, Namibia, South Africa, Swaziland); Temperate Asia (Middle East, China,<br />

Japan, Asian part of Russia); Tropical Asia (India, Sri Lanka, all states east of India<br />

and bordering the south of China, Malaysia, Indonesia, Philippines); Australia, New<br />

Zealand, Canada + Alaska; South-eastern USA (States of continental USA bordering<br />

the Gulf of Mexico: Alabama, Florida, Louisiana, Mississippi, eastern Texas); Western<br />

USA (States of continental USA bordering the Pacific Ocean); Remaining USA (All<br />

states of continental USA between western and south-eastern USA); Mexico; Tropical<br />

South America (all states of continental South America beyond Mexico and except<br />

Argentina, Chile, Uruguay); Chile; Argentina; Cape Verde; Canary + Madeira; Azores;<br />

South Atlantic Islands; Madagascar and Hawaii.<br />

It is presumed that its introduction in Europe dates from the beginning of 19 th<br />

Century (http://uk.encarta.msn.com/media_1481569451_781532557-1_1/Introduced_<br />

Species_in_Europe.html).<br />

First record of Duchesnea indica for the territory of former Yugoslavia (village<br />

Turčin, near Varaždin in Croatia) was reported by T r i n a j s t i ć (1973). In his opinion<br />

species started to spread spontaneously from Graz (Austria), via valley of river Drava.<br />

For current distribution of Duchesnea in Croatia see Flora Croatica Database<br />

(http://hirc.botanic.hr/fcd/).<br />

Data about distribution of Indian strawberry in Slovenia are available in J o g a n<br />

(2001).<br />

In the region species is also reported in Serbia (J o v a n o v i ć , 1994).<br />

At the territory of Montenegro spontaneously growing population of Duchesnea<br />

indica is found in periurban area of Berane, at shady ruderal habitat type. Pathway of<br />

its arrival remains unknown. Considering the fact that in Berane and in surrounding<br />

area, Indian strawberry is not planted as ornamental plant, we exclude the possibility<br />

that it escaped from cultivation.<br />

We believe that further data about distribution of Duchesnea indica in the region<br />

will help us to create precise hypothesis about the pathway of its arrival and spread<br />

over the territory of Montenegro.<br />

Acknowledgement: We would like to thank Prof. Vlado Matevski and dr. Ljiljana Topalić for<br />

valuable communications about distribution of Duchesnea indica in the region.


163<br />

Tomović, Stešević: Duchesnea indica (Andr.) Focke, new alien species in the flora of Montenegro<br />

LITERATURE<br />

H A DŽ I A B L A H O V I Ć, S. 2006: Floristic and chorological additions to the vascular<br />

flora of Montenegro, Proceedings of the II International Symposium of Ecologists<br />

of the Republic of Montenegro, p. 93-101<br />

J A C K O W I A K, B. 1992: On the distribution of Duchesnea indica (Rosaceae) in<br />

Vienna. Fragmenta Floristica et Geobotanica 37: 593-547.<br />

J O G A N, N. ed. 2001: Materials for the Atlas of Flora of Slovenia, Centre for<br />

Cartography of fauna and flora, Ljubljana, pp. 443<br />

J O V A N O V I Ć, S. 1994: Ecological study of ruderal flora and vegetation of Belgrade,<br />

Faculty of Biology, University in Belgrade, 222 pp.<br />

L A U B E R, K. & W A G N E R, G. 2001: Flora Helvetica, Paul Haupt ed., Bern-<br />

Stuttgart-Wien, 1615 pp.<br />

R O H L E N A, J. 1941-1942: Conspectus Florae Montenegrinae, Preslia 20-21<br />

P U L E V I Ć, V. 2005: Materials for the Vascular flora of Montenegro. - Special <strong>edition</strong><br />

of Republic institute for Nature Protetion of Montenegro, Podgorica, 218 pp.<br />

S T E Š E V I Ć, D. & J O V A N O V I Ć S. 2005b: Contribution to the knowledge of non<br />

indigenous flora of Montenegro, Proceedings of the Workshop devoted to 25 th<br />

Anniversary of the Faculty of Sciences nad Mathematics, University of<br />

Montenegro, Podgorica 8-9 September 2005, p. 65-78<br />

S T E Š E V I Ć, D. 2006a: Gagea chrysantha (Jan) Schultes & Schultes fil. and Linaria<br />

genistifolia (L.) Miller subsp. genistifolia two new taxon in the flora of<br />

Montenegro. - Proceedings of II Interanational Symposium of Ecologist of the<br />

Republic of Montenegro, Kotor 20-24. September 2006, p. 69-72<br />

S T E Š E V I Ć, D. & J O G A N, N. 2006a: Two new neophytes in the flora of<br />

Montenegro: Artemisia verlotiorum and Sporobolus vaginiflorus. - Natura<br />

Montenegrina, 5: 173-175<br />

T R I N A J S T I Ć, I. 1973: Duchesnea indica (Andr.) Focke (Rosaceae), nova<br />

adventivna vrsta u flori Jugoslavije.- Acta Botanica Croatica 32: 261-266, Zagreb<br />

V A L E N T I N E, D. H. 1968: Duchesnea Sm., in Tutin at al. eds. Flora Europaea vol.<br />

2., Cambridge, p. 48<br />

W E B E R, E. 2003: Invasive plant species of the world. A reference guide to<br />

environmental weeds. - CABI Publishing, Wallingford, UK, 560 pp.<br />

Received: 14.11.2007


164<br />

Natura Montenegrina, SHORT COMMUNICATION, 6/2007

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!