Fall 2011 | Issue 21
- No tags were found...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>Fall</strong> <strong>2011</strong> | Number Twenty-One | The Berlin Journal | 29<br />
BEYOND NATIONS<br />
Rethinking the history of Habsburg Central Europe<br />
By Pieter Judson<br />
COURTESY THE AUTHOR AND THE ÖSTERREICHISCHE NATIONALBIBLIOTHEK; SOURCE: FLUGBLÄTTER FÜR DEUTSCHÖSTERREICHS RECHT, WIEN, VERLAG ALFRED HÖLDER, 1919<br />
DEUTSCHÖSTERREICH SPRACHGRENZE MAP BASED ON THE 1910 CENSUS<br />
Since the Balkan Wars of a century<br />
ago, historians, journalists, and<br />
policy makers in Europe and the US<br />
have repeatedly interpreted nationalist<br />
political claims and nationalist conflicts in<br />
terms largely devised by nationalists themselves.<br />
In allowing nationalists to shape our<br />
understanding of both historical and contemporary<br />
conflicts, we unwittingly follow<br />
a logic that – taken to extremes – demands<br />
both physical separation and independent<br />
statehood for ethnically defined national<br />
populations. This logic rests on claims that<br />
social life is normally organized by communities<br />
of descent, defined according to<br />
factors as diverse as race, culture, religion,<br />
language, or some vaguely defined ethnicity.<br />
If we wish to prevent violence from<br />
breaking out among neighboring peoples,<br />
this logic demands that political power be<br />
organized on the basis of separation.<br />
Within Europe, the classic locus for the<br />
problem of conflict among nations has<br />
traditionally been understood to be Central<br />
and Eastern Europe. And indeed one could<br />
argue that in the twentieth century, much<br />
blood appeared to be shed for nationalist