PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES - United Kingdom Parliament
PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES - United Kingdom Parliament
PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES - United Kingdom Parliament
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
631 Oral Answers<br />
15 MAY 2013<br />
Oral Answers<br />
632<br />
The Deputy Prime Minister: I am sure my hon. Friend<br />
speaks on behalf of everybody in this House, not only<br />
about the sense of revulsion at these truly evil acts, but<br />
about the fact that we should pay tribute to the courage<br />
of these young women. The innocence of their childhoods<br />
was so horridly destroyed by this evil gang, and we must<br />
all pay tribute to the courage it must have taken for<br />
them to come forward and give evidence. I certainly<br />
agree with my hon. Friend that lessons should be learned<br />
particularly about how the police forces and social<br />
services work together, and that these people should be<br />
handed down the severest possible sentences in response<br />
to this reprehensible crime.<br />
Q3. [154915] Toby Perkins (Chesterfield) (Lab): The<br />
Deputy Prime Minister talks about the individual<br />
tragedy of unemployment, but a year ago this<br />
Government made thousands of Remploy disabled<br />
workers unemployed, and 69% of them are still<br />
unemployed. They wanted to work, but it is costing the<br />
Government more to keep them on the dole. Does that<br />
not show that the Government are not just heartless,<br />
but utterly incompetent?<br />
The Deputy Prime Minister: As I hope the hon.<br />
Gentleman knows, the approach we have taken to Remploy<br />
was in response to independent recommendations made<br />
by senior figures active in the area of disability and the<br />
rights of those with disabilities. The recommendation<br />
that came through was very clear: that it is simply not<br />
right to say to people with disabilities that somehow<br />
they should be hidden away and put in a separate silo,<br />
and we should do what we can to give them support to<br />
be part of the mainstream labour market along with<br />
everybody else. That is why we have not in any way cut<br />
the support for those workers in Remploy factories as<br />
they make the transition from those factories into the<br />
world of mainstream work.<br />
Q4. [154916] Mr Andrew Turner (Isle of Wight) (Con):<br />
Does not the Deputy Prime Minister recall that at the<br />
election he promised to go for an in/out referendum?<br />
That has not taken place yet. Does he understand that<br />
residents of the Isle of Wight, and many from<br />
elsewhere, would feel betrayed if the Liberal Democrats<br />
did not now support an amendment regretting that an<br />
referendum is not included in the Gracious Speech?<br />
The Deputy Prime Minister: As my hon. Friend knows,<br />
our commitment was for a referendum when there is a<br />
fundamental change in the relationship—[Interruption.]<br />
Read our manifesto—I have. I helped to write it, and I<br />
can guarantee that that is what it says, and we have<br />
acted on that. I have an old-fashioned view—[Interruption.]<br />
Mr Speaker: Order. I do not think the Deputy Prime<br />
Minister particularly minds being shouted at, but I do<br />
not want him to be shouted at excessively. The House<br />
should hear his answer, and certainly the people of the<br />
Isle of Wight should hear his answer.<br />
The Deputy Prime Minister: That is very kind of you,<br />
Mr Speaker, thank you.<br />
I have an old-fashioned view that when a Government<br />
put forward a Queen’s Speech that has a lot of good<br />
things in it—a cap on social care costs, a decent single-tier<br />
pension for everybody and a cut in national insurance<br />
contributions for employers to create jobs—we on this<br />
side of the House should go out and promote it and not<br />
spend days bemoaning what is not in it.<br />
Dr William McCrea (South Antrim) (DUP): The<br />
police in Northern Ireland have stated that if the National<br />
Crime Agency is unable to operate fully in Northern<br />
Ireland it will have a detrimental impact on their ability<br />
to keep the people of Northern Ireland safe and to<br />
combat serious and organised crime. Surely no political<br />
party in Northern Ireland has a right to gamble with<br />
the safety of the people of Northern Ireland, so what<br />
do the Government propose to do to ensure that no one<br />
is able to hold the people of Northern Ireland to<br />
ransom and make Northern Ireland an easy target for<br />
international crime?<br />
The Deputy Prime Minister: I am sure everyone shares<br />
my instinct that, as with all sensitive issues in Northern<br />
Ireland, the more we can talk across parties and across<br />
traditional divides and hostilities, the more we promote<br />
the prosperity and security of the people of Northern<br />
Ireland and of the people of the <strong>United</strong> <strong>Kingdom</strong> as a<br />
whole.<br />
Q5. [154918] Mr Alan Reid (Argyll and Bute) (LD):<br />
This Government have helped motorists in my<br />
constituency by cutting fuel duty by 13p on the<br />
mainland and 18p on the island, compared with<br />
Labour’s disastrous plans. Now that the European<br />
authorities are investigating the oil companies, will the<br />
Government ensure that oil companies here obey the<br />
rules and end any price fixing that might be going on?<br />
It is important that the Government’s good policy on<br />
fuel duty means that the benefit ends up in the pockets<br />
of the motorists, not the oil companies.<br />
The Deputy Prime Minister: I am grateful to my hon.<br />
Friend for reminding the House that the price of fuel on<br />
the forecourt would be 13p higher under the plans<br />
embarked on by the Labour party—[Interruption.] Labour<br />
Members hate to hear this and to be reminded of it, but<br />
I am afraid it is true—the price would be 13p higher,<br />
which would be a crippling additional cost of living for<br />
millions of people in this country. I agree with him that<br />
the large oil companies now under investigation for<br />
these allegations should, of course, fully co-operate<br />
with the European Commission.<br />
Jim McGovern (Dundee West) (Lab): May I put a<br />
question to the Deputy Prime Minister that might go<br />
against the grain for me? I have been vociferous in my<br />
support for the Remploy organisation. Unfortunately,<br />
the Remploy factory in my constituency is earmarked<br />
for closure, and members of the work force received<br />
letters in March advising them to seek alternative<br />
employment. Some of them have done so successfully,<br />
but on Monday they were given an interview and told<br />
that they would not be allowed to leave their employment<br />
with Remploy and, if they insisted on doing so, they<br />
would not receive the severance package offered to<br />
every other member of the work force. Will the Deputy<br />
Prime Minister look into this?<br />
The Deputy Prime Minister: Of course—I am sure<br />
that my right hon. Friend the Secretary of State for<br />
Work and Pensions will look into the specific issues that