Compost Toilet Trial Report - Ministry of Civil Defence and ...
Compost Toilet Trial Report - Ministry of Civil Defence and ...
Compost Toilet Trial Report - Ministry of Civil Defence and ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Feedback from the media coverage was extremely positive. The participants received<br />
some light hearted ribbing from friends <strong>and</strong> work colleagues, but most people were<br />
extremely supportive <strong>and</strong> thought the toilets were a good idea.<br />
As a result <strong>of</strong> the media coverage a number <strong>of</strong> contacts were received from other local<br />
government agencies <strong>and</strong> international association, including Global Dry <strong>Toilet</strong><br />
Association <strong>of</strong> Finl<strong>and</strong>, interested in the trial <strong>and</strong> its outcomes.<br />
4.10 Assessment <strong>of</strong> information gathering tools<br />
The trial used a variety <strong>of</strong> methods to collect data (site visits, surveys, diaries <strong>and</strong><br />
debrief). The site visits were critical means <strong>of</strong> gathering information <strong>and</strong> ensuring<br />
participants well-being.<br />
While some participants did not complete all <strong>of</strong> the information gathering tools, all<br />
participants did provide information through at least one method.<br />
Using a range <strong>of</strong> different tools provided different ways for different people to provide<br />
information (Figure 4.17). Many <strong>of</strong> the tools had clear themes, <strong>and</strong> these were similar<br />
across the range <strong>of</strong> tools. Site visits were essential in ensuring the trial was conducted<br />
in a safe environment for participants.<br />
The use <strong>of</strong> a variety <strong>of</strong> information gathering tools meant that all participants<br />
provided feedback on the trial even if they did not use one specific tool.<br />
Figure 4.17 A modified diary title page, perhaps reflecting the participant’s opinion <strong>of</strong> the<br />
information that was collected in the diary.<br />
42