13.06.2014 Views

Barthelmie, RJ

Barthelmie, RJ

Barthelmie, RJ

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Presented at the European Wind Energy Conference and Exhibition, July 2001, Copenhagen<br />

When the wind speed dropped below 4 m/s the<br />

turbines stopped generating. At other times the<br />

measurements were stopped by rain when the SODAR<br />

does not give reliable signals. Despite these difficulties,<br />

wind turbine wakes were clearly measured. These were<br />

indicated by a decrease of wind speed between heights of<br />

30 and 60 m when the turbine was operating and an<br />

increase in the profile at these heights when the turbine<br />

was stopped manually. Figure 7 shows preliminary<br />

results comparing the free stream wind speed profile<br />

measured to the west of the wind farm and the wind<br />

speed profile behind wind turbine 1W at a distance of<br />

approximately 140 m (4 rotor diameters). Both profiles<br />

have been normalised with the free stream wind speed<br />

measured at 50 m on the offshore meteorological mast.<br />

Analysis of the experiment data are underway and will<br />

focus on single wakes (although double wakes were also<br />

measured) at distances between 1.5 and 6 rotor<br />

diameters.<br />

12<br />

April 2001<br />

22 23 24 25 26 27<br />

Height (m)<br />

100<br />

80<br />

60<br />

40<br />

20<br />

0<br />

Free-stream<br />

Wake<br />

.<br />

0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6<br />

Normalised wind speed<br />

Wind speed (m/s)<br />

8<br />

4<br />

0<br />

Sailing times<br />

Figure 6. Wind speed during the SODAR experiment<br />

(22-27 April 2001).<br />

Figure 7. SODAR measured offshore wind speed profile<br />

(normalised with mast measured wind speed at 50 m).<br />

4 SUMMARY<br />

The ENDOW project focuses on the evaluation and<br />

development of wake models for use in an offshore<br />

environment. Boundary-layer measurements from<br />

existing offshore wind farms are being used for the<br />

evaluation. Results from an experiment with a boat<br />

mounted SODAR are also providing near-wake wind<br />

speed profiles. Additionally boundary-layer models are<br />

being improved for use with wake models to improve<br />

prediction in the coastal zone and over the area of large<br />

offshore wind farms.<br />

3 FUTURE WORK<br />

The main focus of the project is to incorporate<br />

improvements in wake and boundary layer models within<br />

design tools for use in offshore environments. At this<br />

time three main components are envisaged:<br />

1) Coupling between WA S P to provide a regional<br />

climatology and a local scale model (CDM2) with<br />

stability, wind-wave-roughness and internal<br />

boundary-layer sub modules.<br />

2) Production of an enhanced wake model. This task is<br />

mainly directed towards selection of suitable codes<br />

according to performance, input requirements and<br />

computational feasibility.<br />

3) Since grid connections are a major expenditure in<br />

offshore projects, minimisation of these costs will be<br />

a significant factor in the overall design optimisation<br />

of offshore wind farms.<br />

The utility and efficiency of the design tools will be<br />

evaluated at a number of planned offshore wind farms.<br />

5 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS<br />

Financial support for this research was given in part<br />

by the European Commission's Fifth Framework<br />

Programme under the Energy, Environment and<br />

Sustainable Development Programme. Project<br />

Reference: ERK6-1999-00001 ENDOW (Efficient<br />

Development of Offshore Windfarms). Additonal<br />

funding was supplied by NOVEM for Ecofys and ECN.<br />

6 REFERENCES<br />

1. <strong>Barthelmie</strong>, R.J., M.S. Courtney, J. Højstrup and<br />

S.E. Larsen, J. Wind Eng. & Indust. Aerodyn., 1996.<br />

62: p. 191-211.<br />

2. Rados, K., et al. EWEC. 2001. Copenhagen.<br />

3. <strong>Barthelmie</strong>, R.J., B. Grisogono and S.C. Pryor, J.<br />

Geophys. Res., 1996. 101: p. 21,327-21,337.<br />

4. Smedman, A.S., U. Hogstrom and H. Bergstrom,<br />

Wind Eng., 1996. 20: p. 137-147.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!