Annual Report 2006 - Rheinland Pfalz Bank
Annual Report 2006 - Rheinland Pfalz Bank
Annual Report 2006 - Rheinland Pfalz Bank
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Statement of Financial Condition – Risk <strong>Report</strong><br />
LRP <strong>2006</strong><br />
21<br />
Risk <strong>Report</strong><br />
We apply conservative standards to our risk culture and our risk management. This<br />
is in line with the risk policy of the LBBW Group. The framework for our business<br />
activities is defined by our risk strategy, which is geared to our risk-bearing capacity.<br />
The approval of our internal rating approach by the Federal <strong>Bank</strong>ing Supervisory<br />
Office marked the successful completion of the Basle II project.<br />
Risk-bearing Capacity as the Foundation<br />
of Risk Management<br />
Our risk management activities are based on a riskbearing<br />
capacity concept which takes all material risk<br />
categories into account. Counterparty risks (individual<br />
and country risks), market and operational risks are<br />
quantified based on the Value-at-Risk (VaR) approach<br />
and compared with the <strong>Bank</strong>’s risk-bearing potential in<br />
cash terms – indicating its long-term earning power<br />
and asset base. Different scenarios (standard, stress<br />
and worst-case scenarios) for the individual risk categories<br />
and rules for the aggregation of the individual<br />
risks to the overall risk assumed by the <strong>Bank</strong> have<br />
been defined to count the risks against the <strong>Bank</strong>’s riskbearing<br />
capacity. The orientation of the <strong>Bank</strong>’s lending<br />
risk strategies, its positioning in the trading units as<br />
well as the VaR limits and risk capital both for counterparty<br />
and market risks are derived from these<br />
approaches.<br />
Limit allocation is adjusted annually based on the riskbearing<br />
potential. These parameters are monitored on<br />
an ongoing basis in the course of the year. The compliance<br />
with and use of the limit, the risk-bearing capacity<br />
and changes to the latter as well as compliance with the<br />
strategy are mapped and analyzed. This is done to ensure<br />
that the <strong>Bank</strong> only assumes risks which it can<br />
bear without reducing its long-term earning power and<br />
asset base.<br />
IRB Approach Approved by the Federal <strong>Bank</strong>ing<br />
Supervisory Office<br />
In the year under review, our credit risk controlling<br />
and management efforts were marked by the application<br />
of the IRB Foundation Approach in the context of<br />
the new capital adequacy requirements as of the defined<br />
target date. The Federal <strong>Bank</strong>ing Supervisory Office<br />
has approved our internal rating approach, which<br />
means that starting 1 January 2007 our internal rating<br />
approach based on our own estimates of the probability<br />
of default will be used to determine the capital backing<br />
for all relevant portfolios exposed to counterparty<br />
risks.<br />
The internal rating coverage for both the positions and<br />
the risk-weighted positions as defined in the Solvency<br />
Directive clearly exceeds 92 % both at LRP and at the<br />
LRP Group. This means that LRP is the first bank within<br />
the German savings banks organization and one of only<br />
very few German banks to have reached the exit<br />
threshold for the temporary partial use already as of<br />
1 January 2007.<br />
The counterparty risk management instruments used<br />
by LRP are based on the definition of the counterparty<br />
default risk. LRP defines this as the risk of business<br />
partners failing to meet their obligations. These risks<br />
range from defaults due to bankruptcy, issuer’s and<br />
counterparty risks to country risks resulting from currency<br />
transfer restrictions.