Dept. of Agriculture, Dept. of Defense - Roberts Environmental Center

More documents

Recommendations

Info

B Dept. of Defense-- Army Dept. of Defense--Army 2010 Web Pages The US Army’s first and second (2007 and 2009) sustainability reports are the first from any US Government agency. The Army's sustainability website has more figures and data than found on most other agency sustainability websites as well. Future sustainability goals were highly detailed in the webpages and abundant numerical data made it easy to chart progress over time. Analyst(s): Starrisha Marche Godfrey-Canada E=Total Environmental Score, ESA=Environmental Sector Average Score, EI=Environmental Intent, ER=Environmental Reporting, EP=Environmental Performance, S=Total Social Score, SSA=Social Sector Average Score, SI=Social Intent, SR=Social Reporting, SP=Social Performance Comparison with sector averages Source of points Distribution of points E ESA S SSA 0 25 50 75 E 58% S 42% 69 24 33 29 0 2 EI ER EP SI SR SP Dept. of Defense-- Army Environmental Intent Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment Accountability 2 4 50 Good GRI 2005 Social Indicator for Public Agencies 0 2 0 Needs substantial improvement Management 6 8 75 Excellent Policy 9 12 75 Excellent Urban Environmental Accords 2 2 100 Excellent Vision 3 4 75 Excellent Environmental Reporting Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment Energy 3 14 21 Needs substantial improvement Management 3 21 14 Needs substantial improvement Recycling 1 14 7 Needs substantial improvement Waste 5 21 24 Needs substantial improvement Water 1 7 14 Needs substantial improvement Social Intent Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment Accountability 1 4 25 Needs improvement Management 4 10 40 Needs improvement Policy 0 6 0 Needs substantial improvement Public Sector 1 4 25 Needs improvement Social Demographic 1 2 50 Good Vision 3 4 75 Excellent Social Reporting Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment Human Rights 16 77 21 Needs substantial improvement Management 3 7 43 Needs improvement Qualitative Social 8 35 23 Needs substantial improvement Quantitative Social 4 42 10 Needs substantial improvement www.roberts.cmc.edu 26 Sustainability Reporting of Largest U.S. Federal Agencies
A Dept. of Defense-- Navy Dept. of Defense--Navy 2010 Web Pages The US Navy's sustainability information is well done, but is scattered throughout their website and difficult to navigate to. If they could compile all their sustainability information into one page, it would be one of the most informative and complete sustainability websites of any agency., but it was still above average. Analyst(s): Timothy Kareem Smedley E=Total Environmental Score, ESA=Environmental Sector Average Score, EI=Environmental Intent, ER=Environmental Reporting, EP=Environmental Performance, S=Total Social Score, SSA=Social Sector Average Score, SI=Social Intent, SR=Social Reporting, SP=Social Performance Comparison with sector averages Source of points Distribution of points E ESA S SSA 0 25 50 75 E 47% S 53% 87 72 38 25 0 4 EI ER EP SI SR SP Dept. of Defense-- Navy Environmental Intent Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment Accountability 4 4 100 Excellent GRI 2005 Social Indicator for Public Agencies 2 2 100 Excellent Management 4 8 50 Good Policy 9 12 75 Excellent Urban Environmental Accords 2 2 100 Excellent Vision 2 4 50 Good Environmental Reporting Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment Energy 4 14 29 Needs improvement Management 4 21 19 Needs substantial improvement Recycling 3 14 21 Needs substantial improvement Waste 3 21 14 Needs substantial improvement Water 0 7 0 Needs substantial improvement Social Intent Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment Accountability 2 4 50 Good Management 10 10 100 Excellent Policy 6 6 100 Excellent Public Sector 2 4 50 Good Social Demographic 2 2 100 Excellent Vision 4 4 100 Excellent Social Reporting Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment Human Rights 22 77 29 Needs improvement Management 3 7 43 Needs improvement Qualitative Social 14 35 40 Needs improvement Quantitative Social 3 42 7 Needs substantial improvement www.roberts.cmc.edu 27 Sustainability Reporting of Largest U.S. Federal Agencies
Page 1 and 2: Dept. of Agriculture, Dept. of Defe
Page 3 and 4: US Government Agencies U.S. Largest
Page 5 and 6: The Pacific Sustainability Index (P
Page 7 and 8: U.S. Government Agencies Environmen
Page 9 and 10: U.S. Government Agencies Social Int
Page 11 and 12: U.S. Government Agencies Environmen
Page 13 and 14: U.S. Government Agencies Social Int
Page 15 and 16: Environmental Intent Scores Dept. o
Page 17 and 18: Environmental Performance Scores Ge
Page 19 and 20: Social Reporting Scores Dept. of En
Page 21 and 22: U.S. Government Agencies Human Righ
Page 23 and 24: Number of Explicit numerical goals
Page 25: B- Dept. of Defense-- Air Force Dep
Page 29 and 30: A+ Dept. of Homeland Security Dept.
Page 31 and 32: B+ Dept. of Transportation Dept. of
Page 33 and 34: B+ General Services Administration
Page 35 and 36: B- USEPA USEPA 2010 Web Pages Unsur
Page 37 and 38: Biodiversity -Discussion: of the or
Page 39 and 40: Carbon dioxide (CO2) or equivalents
Page 41 and 42: Occupational health and safety prot
Page 43: Dept. of Agriculture, Dept. of Defe

Dept. of Agriculture, Dept. of Defense - Roberts Environmental Center

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?