14.06.2014 Views

Dept. of Agriculture, Dept. of Defense - Roberts Environmental Center

Dept. of Agriculture, Dept. of Defense - Roberts Environmental Center

Dept. of Agriculture, Dept. of Defense - Roberts Environmental Center

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

B-<br />

<strong>Dept</strong>. <strong>of</strong> the Interior<br />

<strong>Dept</strong>. <strong>of</strong> the Interior 2010 Web Pages<br />

The U.S. Department <strong>of</strong> the Interior’s FY 2008 Annual <strong>Environmental</strong> Management Systems Report, FY 2008-2012 Workforce and Succession Plan, Green<br />

Purchasing Plan, Strategic Sustainability Performance Plan, and 2010 web pages contain much information on the department’s environmental and social<br />

programs and goals. The department has numerous energy and water conservation projects including the implementation <strong>of</strong> solar panels. Although the<br />

department has a good discussion <strong>of</strong> these programs and initiatives, and states that data are collected and reported, not much <strong>of</strong> the data is provided;<br />

lacking are data on environmental issues such as energy use, water conservation, and waste production; and on employee data such as turnover and<br />

accident rate. The Department <strong>of</strong> the Interior has a number <strong>of</strong> initiatives that show its dedication to the country’s Native American population; however, it<br />

does not report similar initiatives on its responsibility to its workforce, nor does it provide a code <strong>of</strong> ethics.<br />

Analyst(s):<br />

Karina Gomez<br />

E=Total <strong>Environmental</strong> Score, ESA=<strong>Environmental</strong> Sector Average Score, EI=<strong>Environmental</strong> Intent, ER=<strong>Environmental</strong> Reporting, EP=<strong>Environmental</strong> Performance, S=Total Social<br />

Score, SSA=Social Sector Average Score, SI=Social Intent, SR=Social Reporting, SP=Social Performance<br />

Comparison with sector averages<br />

Source <strong>of</strong> points<br />

Distribution <strong>of</strong> points<br />

E<br />

ESA<br />

S<br />

SSA<br />

0 25 50 75<br />

E<br />

53%<br />

S<br />

47%<br />

63<br />

57<br />

11<br />

20<br />

0<br />

0<br />

EI ER EP SI SR SP<br />

<strong>Dept</strong>. <strong>of</strong> the Interior<br />

<strong>Environmental</strong> Intent<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Accountability 2 4 50 Good<br />

GRI 2005 Social Indicator for Public Agencies 0 2 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Management 6 8 75 Excellent<br />

Policy 7 12 58 Good<br />

Urban <strong>Environmental</strong> Accords 1 2 50 Good<br />

Vision 4 4 100 Excellent<br />

<strong>Environmental</strong> Reporting<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Energy 2 14 14 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Management 1 21 5 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Recycling 1 14 7 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Waste 1 21 5 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Water 1 7 14 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Social Intent<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Accountability 2 4 50 Good<br />

Management 8 10 80 Excellent<br />

Policy 0 6 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Public Sector 2 4 50 Good<br />

Social Demographic 1 2 50 Good<br />

Vision 4 4 100 Excellent<br />

Social Reporting<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Human Rights 10 77 13 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Management 2 7 29 Needs improvement<br />

Qualitative Social 8 35 23 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Quantitative Social 1 42 2 Needs substantial improvement<br />

www.roberts.cmc.edu 30 Sustainability Reporting <strong>of</strong> Largest U.S. Federal Agencies

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!