14.06.2014 Views

Dept. of Agriculture, Dept. of Defense - Roberts Environmental Center

Dept. of Agriculture, Dept. of Defense - Roberts Environmental Center

Dept. of Agriculture, Dept. of Defense - Roberts Environmental Center

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

B+<br />

<strong>Dept</strong>. <strong>of</strong><br />

Transportation<br />

<strong>Dept</strong>. <strong>of</strong> Transportation 2010 Web Pages<br />

The U.S. Department <strong>of</strong> Transportation is a huge agency and provides a large amount <strong>of</strong> sustainability information on its website, but it is not centralized,<br />

nor is there a central sustainability index for it, so it is difficult to sort out. Rather the information is provided piecemeal as it has come in from various<br />

divisions. Similar to the sustainability issue, it is difficult to find overall departmental procedures, guidelines, and employment information for the entire<br />

Department <strong>of</strong> Transportation. The next iteration <strong>of</strong> DOT's website should provide a more integrated approach.<br />

Analyst(s): Jesse Maximilliano Madrigal<br />

E=Total <strong>Environmental</strong> Score, ESA=<strong>Environmental</strong> Sector Average Score, EI=<strong>Environmental</strong> Intent, ER=<strong>Environmental</strong> Reporting, EP=<strong>Environmental</strong> Performance, S=Total Social<br />

Score, SSA=Social Sector Average Score, SI=Social Intent, SR=Social Reporting, SP=Social Performance<br />

Comparison with sector averages<br />

Source <strong>of</strong> points<br />

Distribution <strong>of</strong> points<br />

E<br />

ESA<br />

S<br />

SSA<br />

0 25 50 75<br />

E<br />

50%<br />

S<br />

50%<br />

97<br />

78<br />

13<br />

23<br />

0<br />

2<br />

EI ER EP SI SR SP<br />

<strong>Dept</strong>. <strong>of</strong><br />

Transportation<br />

<strong>Environmental</strong> Intent<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Accountability 2 4 50 Good<br />

GRI 2005 Social Indicator for Public Agencies 2 2 100 Excellent<br />

Management 4 8 50 Good<br />

Policy 11 12 92 Excellent<br />

Urban <strong>Environmental</strong> Accords 2 2 100 Excellent<br />

Vision 4 4 100 Excellent<br />

<strong>Environmental</strong> Reporting<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Energy 1 14 7 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Management 2 21 10 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Recycling 0 14 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Waste 4 21 19 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Water 0 7 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Social Intent<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Accountability 4 4 100 Excellent<br />

Management 10 10 100 Excellent<br />

Policy 6 6 100 Excellent<br />

Public Sector 3 4 75 Excellent<br />

Social Demographic 2 2 100 Excellent<br />

Vision 4 4 100 Excellent<br />

Social Reporting<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Human Rights 12 77 16 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Management 2 7 29 Needs improvement<br />

Qualitative Social 8 35 23 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Quantitative Social 4 42 10 Needs substantial improvement<br />

www.roberts.cmc.edu 31 Sustainability Reporting <strong>of</strong> Largest U.S. Federal Agencies

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!