16.06.2014 Views

engaging communities - 2009 Victorian Bushfires Royal Commission

engaging communities - 2009 Victorian Bushfires Royal Commission

engaging communities - 2009 Victorian Bushfires Royal Commission

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>2009</strong> <strong>Victorian</strong> <strong>Bushfires</strong> <strong>Royal</strong> <strong>Commission</strong>—Interim Report<br />

2 ENGAGING COMMUNITIES<br />

From the outset the <strong>Commission</strong> saw its interaction with all <strong>Victorian</strong>s, and in particular those affected by the<br />

fires, as a vital cornerstone of its investigation into the fires. This chapter begins with a brief overview of the full<br />

range of initiatives implemented by the <strong>Commission</strong> to engage with the community. It then moves to the primary<br />

focus of this chapter — a detailed account of the community consultations held in March and April <strong>2009</strong> and a<br />

summary of the issues raised. The chapter concludes with a brief account of the involvement of lay witnesses in<br />

the first round of public hearings.<br />

Communicating with the <strong>Commission</strong><br />

2.1<br />

2.2<br />

2.3<br />

Initial interaction with the community began through avenues such as the offices of the Premier, the<br />

Governor-General, the <strong>Victorian</strong> Attorney-General, the Prime Minister, the Department of Premier and<br />

Cabinet, the Department of Justice, Members of Parliament (federal and state), the Supreme Court of<br />

Victoria and local municipalities. A broad array of material was received by the <strong>Commission</strong> either directly<br />

or through referral, including:<br />

■■ offers for services (pro bono and paid)<br />

■■ personal accounts of the fires<br />

■■ complaints about how the emergency services responded to the fire<br />

■■ submissions to the <strong>Commission</strong><br />

■■ copies of academic publications, books, research papers and previous reports<br />

■■ enquiries about how the <strong>Commission</strong> could provide support to individuals affected by the fires.<br />

Processes to manage the initial contacts were put in place by the <strong>Commission</strong> Secretariat. A toll free 1800<br />

number was provided as an enquiry line, an email enquiry address commenced operation on 24 February<br />

<strong>2009</strong>, and the <strong>Commission</strong> website was launched on 16 March. 1<br />

<strong>Commission</strong> staff responded to initial contacts by phone, email or post, and, where appropriate, provided<br />

contact details for other agencies providing bushfire assistance. These agencies included the <strong>Victorian</strong><br />

Bushfire Reconstruction and Recovery Authority, the <strong>Victorian</strong> Bushfire Case Management Service and<br />

Bushfire Legal Help. 2 In addition, a process for the lodgement of formal submissions to the <strong>Commission</strong><br />

was advertised and commenced operation in March (Chapter 3).<br />

Consultations in Fire-affected Communities<br />

2.4 The <strong>Commission</strong>’s first priority was to meet with and listen to people from those <strong>communities</strong> directly<br />

affected by the fires. Between 18 March and 9 April the <strong>Commission</strong> held community consultations in<br />

fire-affected locations. The community consultations were an important foundation for the work of the<br />

<strong>Commission</strong>. Beginning its work in bushfire-affected <strong>communities</strong> enabled the <strong>Commission</strong> to hear<br />

first-hand about people’s experiences, and gain valuable insights into how individuals and <strong>communities</strong><br />

responded to current bushfire-related policies and programs. The community consultation process is<br />

outlined in paragraphs 2.14–2.31.<br />

84<br />

Communication Facilitated by the <strong>Commission</strong><br />

2.5 The <strong>Commission</strong> website, launched in March, provided information about the <strong>Commission</strong> and its<br />

processes, including the community consultations, the submissions process and how to view submissions,<br />

the role of the public hearings and their dates and times, and a media centre. During the hearings interested<br />

people were able to view the transcripts on the <strong>Commission</strong> website from the following day.<br />

2.6 Also, to maximise immediate access to its work, the <strong>Commission</strong> provided live web-streaming of the hearings.<br />

This proved to be extremely popular. During the first block of hearings, more than 5700 people logged in to<br />

watch, including approximately 100 ‘unique browsers’ watching from outside Australia. A lower-bandwidth<br />

audio-only option was also provided early in the hearings, which increased in popularity. Approximately 80 per<br />

cent of those listening to or watching the hearings were from Melbourne and about 10 per cent were from<br />

Sydney. The overseas viewers resided in countries such as the United States, New Zealand, China, Thailand,<br />

Singapore, Canada and the United Kingdom.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!