IWMP 7 - Commissionerate of Rural Development Gujarat State ...

Detail Project Report IWMP 7 

GUJARAT STATE WATERSHED MANAGEMENT AGENCY 

DETAILED PROJECT REPORT (DPR) 

IWMP 7 (Sarasva - North) 

IWMP-2010-11 

Gujarat State watershed Management Agency


Contents 

Table no.1: Basic project information ................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 5 

Table no.2: Weightage of the project .................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 8 

Table no.3: Watershed information .................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 10 

Table no.4: Developmental programmes running in the project area: .......................................................................................................................................................... 10 

Table no. 5: Previous Watershed programmes in the project area: ............................................................................................................................................................... 11 

Table no. 6: PIA: .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 12 

Table no. 7: Staff at PIA level: ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 15 

Table no. 8: Land use pattern: ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 16 

Table no. 9: Soil type and topography: ............................................................................................................................................................................................................. 18 

Table no. 10: Flood and drought condition: ..................................................................................................................................................................................................... 19 

Table no. 11.1: Soil Erosion ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 20 

Table no. 11.2: Soil Salinity/Alkalinity (Salinity ingress) ............................................................................................................................................................................... 20 

Table no. 11.3: Waterlogging Conditions ......................................................................................................................................................................................................... 21 

Table no. 12: Climatic conditions: ..................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 21 

Table no. 13: Physiography and relief .............................................................................................................................................................................................................. 22 

Table no. 14: Land ownership details ............................................................................................................................................................................................................... 22 

Table no. 15: Agriculture ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 23 

Table no. 16: Irrigation ...................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 23 

Table no. 17: Crop details: ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 24 

Table no. 18: Livestock ...................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 27 

Table no. 19: Drinking water ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 28 

Table no. 20: Details of Common Property Resources .................................................................................................................................................................................... 28 

Table no. 21: Demographic information ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... 29 

Table no. 22: Literacy rate ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 30 



Table no. 23: Migration details .......................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 30 

Table no. 24: Poverty ......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 31 

Table no. 25: Village infrastructure .................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 32 

Table no. 26 : Facilities / HH assets .................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 32 

Table no. 27: Income .......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 33 

Table no.28: Dependence on Forest/CPR ......................................................................................................................................................................................................... 33 

Table no. 29: Livelihood pattern (Occupational distribution) ........................................................................................................................................................................ 34 

Table no. 30: Details of Scientific Planning and Inputs in IWMP projects* ................................................................................................................................................... 36 

Table no. 31: Watershed Committee details .................................................................................................................................................................................................... 46 

Table no. 32: SHG detail ..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 56 

Table no. 33: UG detail ....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 58 

Table no.34: Entry point activities (EPA) (All financial figures in Lacks Rs.) ................................................................................................................................................ 62 

Table no.35: Details of activities of preparatory phase (All financial figures in Lacks Rs.) ........................................................................................................................ 42 

Table no.36: Activities related to Surface water resources in the project areas (all financial figures in Lacks Rs.) .................................................................................. 63 

Table no.37: Activities related to recharging ground water resources in the project areas (all financial figures in Lacks Rs.) ............................................................... 72 

Table no. 38: Activities related to livelihoods by Self Help Groups (SHGs) in the project areas ................................................................................................................. 95 

Table no. 39: Other activities of watershed works phase – Proposed target .................................................................................................... Error! Bookmark not defined. 

Table no.40: Details of engineering structures in watershed works* ................................................................................................................ Error! Bookmark not defined. 

Table no.41: Details of activities connected with vegetative cover in watershed works ............................................................................................................................. 99 

Table no.42: Details of allied / other activities ................................................................................................................................................................................................ 72 

Table no.43: Details of activities in the CPRs in the project areas ................................................................................................................................................................ 104 

Table no. 44: Capacity Building Institution: ................................................................................................................................................................................................... 104 

Table no. 45: Capacity Building plan:.............................................................................................................................................................................................................. 104 

Table no.46: Information, education and Communication Activities: ......................................................................................................................................................... 105 

Table no. 47: Village wise- activity wise budget ............................................................................................................................................................................................ 107 



Table no. 48: Budget at a glance ...................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 107 

Table no.49: Details of Convergence of IWMP with other Schemes ............................................................................................................................................................. 108 

Table no. 50: Public-Private Partnership in the IWMP projects* ................................................................................................................................................................. 108 

Table no. 51: Employment in Project area: .................................................................................................................................................................................................... 119 

Table no. 52: Details of seasonal migration from Project area ..................................................................................................................................................................... 120 

Table no. 53: Details of average ground water table depth in the project areas (in meters) .................................................................................................................... 121 

Table no. 54: Status of Drinking water*.......................................................................................................................................................................................................... 113 

Table no. 55: Details of Kharif crop area and yield in the project areas ...................................................................................................................................................... 113 

Table no. 56: Area under horticulture ............................................................................................................................................................................................................ 113 

Table no. 57: Forest/vegetative cover ................................................................................................................................................................. Error! Bookmark not defined. 

Table no. 58: Details of livestock in the project areas * (for fluids please mention in litres, for solids please mention in kgs. and income in Rs.) .............................. 117 

Table no. 59: Backward-Forward linkages..................................................................................................................................................................................................... 121 



Executive Summary 

Sarasva (N) cluster (IWMP 7) has been Sanction under the Integrated Watershed Management Programme running under the new Common Guideline 2008. It is 

located in South West direction of the Kadana taluka; Panchmahal district and Gujarat state. It consists of sixteen villages (Sarasva (N), Ditvas, Karvai, Moti Rath, 

Nani Rath, Bhul, Nana Padadara, Tarkoni Nal, Amboja, Karodia (North), Sarsdi, Rankakot, Jambunala, Pachher, Ghaswada, Ranakpur). The total Geographical area of 

the watershed project is about 8364.96 ha, of which 2258.06 ha has been covered under Watershed –Hariyali Project remaining 6232.72 ha has to treat under 

Integrated Watershed management Programme. This covers 10 Micro watersheds. Based on thirteen Parameter (as per table no 2.1) watershed area has been 

selected. 

District Watershed Development Unit, Panchmahal has been selected as Project Implementation Agency (PIA) for Sarasva (N) cluster (IWMP 7) by State level Nodal 

Agency (GSWMA – Gujarat State Watershed Management Agency for Gujarat state). PIA is responsible for the Successful Implementation of the Watershed project. 

The WDT is an integral part of the PIA and will be set up by the PIA. WDT should have knowledge and experience in agriculture, soil science, water management, 

social mobilization and institutional building. 

DPR (Detail Project Report) is prepared after carrying out Baseline Survey, Technical survey and PRA Exercise (Participatory Rural appraisal) at village level. As per 

NRAA‘s Tools for Base Line Survey and Performance Assessment of Watershed Development Projects in India; Baseline survey was conducted at household level for 

Socio-economic information, Bio-physical survey was conducted at field level for natural resource information; same as PRA for better people participation and 

need identification of local people. Then Work plan will be prepared and resolution of DPR in Garmshabha will be done. 

Scientific inputs like GPS, GIS are used for watershed planning. Soil and water conservation structures are selected by Ridge to valley approach. Livelihood activities 

for the asset less persons have been planed as per local people’s competencies. Production system and micro enterprises have been planned as per requirement of 

local people. For better implementation, we have designed a capacity building schedule for the different stakeholders like User groups, Self Help Groups, Village 

watershed committee etc. 

Soil and water conservation activities, livelihood plan, production system and enterprise development work will be implemented as peer DPR during the work 

phase. Expected outcome was pre-discussed and finalized DPR has been summed up using LFA (Logical framework of Analysis). 



CHAPTER 1 

PROJECT BACKGROUND 



1. 1. Basic Project Information 

Panchmahal district is a part of Eastern Hilly Region of the state and sub-divided into two sub-micro regions namely, Mahi plain and Forested scrub zone, on the 

basis of topography, climate, soils and natural vegetation. It lies between the parallels of latitude 22.17° and 23.20° and the meridians of Longitude 73.20° and 74.2°. 

The length of the district from north to south is about 128.7 km and from east to west about 68.1 km. It is bounded on the north by the Sabarkantha district, on the 

east by Dahod district, on the south by Anand districts. Out of the total geographical area (513819 Ha), of the district, cultivable land 47 percent and 22.50 percent 

land is under forest cover and its rank is 5th in terms of area among the district of the state. The region covers the western part of the district and includes 

Lunawada, Santrampur, Godhra, Kalol, Shehera, and Halol talukas. Geographically, the rocks found in this region are alluvium, blown sand, etc., Deccan trap, 

Erinpurru Granite, Gneiss Aravalli and associated rocks. 

The project IWMP 7 consists of sixteen villages of the Kadana Block which falls on North part of the district Panchmahal. The villages are named Sarasva (N), Ditvas, 

Karvai, Moti Rath, Nani Rath, Bhul, Nana Padadara, Tarkoni Nal, Amboja, Karodia (North), Sarsdi, Rankakot, Jambunala, Pachher, Ghaswada, Ranakpur. Basic details 

like the census code, Gram panchayat, Block, Total area, area to be treated in this project and the project cost of the Project IWMP 7 are furnished in the Table no. 1 

Table no.1: Basic project information 

Villages 

Name 

Sl 

of the 

No. 

Name 

Census code 

project 

Gram Panchayats Taluka District 

Area of the 

project 

Area 

proposed to 

be treated 

Total 

project 

cost (in 

lack Rs) 

1 

Sarasva (N) 170020115370000 Sarasva (N) Old 

1470.50 970.50 116.460 

2 Ditvas 170020115350000 

1300.09 800.09 96.011 

Ditvas 

3 Karvai 170020115360000 508.44 508.44 61.013 

4 Moti Rath 170020115490000 Moti Rath 882.84 382.84 45.941 

5 Nani Rath 170020115500000 Nani Rath 462.06 395.82 32.400 

6 IWMP Bhul 170020115380000 

169.57 169.57 20.348 

Bhul Kadana Panchmahal 

7 7 Nana Padadara 170020115470000 130.97 130.97 15.716 

8 Tarkoni Nal 170020115480000 Tarkoni Nal 259.72 259.72 31.166 

9 Amboja 170020115640000 

391.55 391.55 46.986 

10 Karodia (North) 170020115650000 Sarsdi 

478.72 246.93 29.632 

11 Sarsdi 170020115660000 787.27 520.06 62.407 

12 Rankakot 170020115530000 Ghaswada 152.57 152.57 18.308 

PIA 

DWDU 

Panchmahal 


13 Jambunala 170020115630000 239.44 239.44 28.733 

14 Pachher 170020115520000 256.92 256.92 30.830 

15 Ghaswada 170020115620000 403.40 403.40 48.408 

16 Ranakpur 170020115590000 Ranakpur 470.90 403.90 48.468 

Total 8364.96 6232.72 732.827 


The project IWMP 7 covers mainly ten micro-watersheds named 5E2A1a1d, 5E2A1a1c, 5E2A1a1e, 5E2A1a1a, 5E1C4c2c, 5E1C4c1c, 5E1C4a1a, 5E2A1a1b, 

5E1C4b2b and 5E1C4a2c. The details of the previous project in the area are described in the table no. 4 and table no. 5. 

1.2 Need of Watershed Development Programme 

Watershed approach has emerged as a sustainable strategy to conserve the natural resources i.e. water, forest, soil in an integrated manner particularly in the rain 

fed and drought areas. As per an estimate of Government of India, The integrated and holistic approach of watershed development has been focused for sustainable 

development of the backward region. 

Due to the geographical diversity, Panchmahal needs Integrated Watershed Management Programme. (IWMP) Watershed Development Programme is selected on 

the basis of thirteen parameter namely Poverty Index, Percentage of SC/ST, Actual Wages, Percentage of small and marginal farmers, ground water status, moisture 

Index, Area under rainfed agriculture, Drinking Water situation in the area, Percentage of Degraded land, Productivity potential of the land, Continuity of another 

watershed that has already developed/ treated, cluster approach for plain or for holly terrain. Based on these thirteen parameters a composite ranking was given in 

the table No. 2 

Table no.2: Weightage of the project 

Project name 

Weightage 

Village 

i ii iii iv v vi vii viii ix X xi xii Xiii 

Total 

Sarasava(N) 7.5 10 5 10 3 10 15 5 15 15 5 0 15 115.5 

Ditvas 7.5 10 5 10 3 10 15 5 15 15 5 0 15 115.5 

Karvai 7.5 10 5 10 3 10 15 5 15 15 10 0 15 120.50 

IWMP 7 

Motirath 7.5 10 5 10 3 10 15 5 15 15 10 0 15 120.50 

Nanirath 7.5 10 5 10 3 10 15 5 15 15 5 0 15 115.5 

Bhul 7.5 10 5 10 3 10 15 7.5 10 10 5 0 15 118.00 

Nana Padadara 7.5 10 5 10 3 10 15 7.5 10 10 5 0 15 113.00 

Tarkoninal 5 10 5 10 3 10 10 7.5 10 10 5 0 15 98.00 

Amboja 5 10 5 10 3 10 10 7.5 10 10 5 0 15 100.50 


Gujarat State watershed Management Agency 


Karodiya 5 10 5 10 3 10 10 7.5 10 10 5 0 15 105.50 

Sarasadi 5 10 5 10 3 10 10 7.5 10 10 5 0 15 105.50 

Rakakot 5 10 5 10 3 10 10 7.5 10 10 5 0 15 105.50 

Jambunala 5 10 5 10 3 10 10 7.5 10 10 5 0 15 105.50 

Pacher 5 10 5 10 3 10 10 7.5 10 10 5 0 15 105.50 

Ghasvada 5 10 5 10 3 10 10 7.5 10 10 5 0 15 105.50 

Ranakpur 5 10 5 10 3 10 10 7.5 10 10 5 0 15 105.50 

Table No.2.1: Criteria and weightge for selection of watershed 

S. 

Maximum 

Criteria 

Ranges & scores 

No 

score 

Poverty index (% of poor to 

i 

10 Above 80 % (10) 80 to 50 % (7.5) 50 to 20 % (5) 

population) 

ii % of SC/ ST population 10 More than 40 % (10) 20 to 40 % (5) Less than 20 % (3) 

iii Actual wages 5 

iv 

% of small and marginal 

farmers 

Actual wages are significantly 

lower than minimum wages (5) 

Actual wages are equal to or 

higher than minimum wages 

(0) 

10 More than 80 % (10) 50 to 80 % (5) Less than 50 % (3) 

Below 20 

% (2.5) 

v Ground water status 5 Over exploited (5) Critical (3) Sub critical (2) Safe (0) 

vi 

vii 

Moisture index/ 

DPAP/ DDP Block 

Area under rain-fed 

agriculture 

15 

-66.7 & below (15) 

DDP Block 

-33.3 to -66.6 (10) 

DPAP Block 

0 to -33.2 (0) 

Non DPAP/ DDP Block 

15 More than 90 % (15) 80 to 90 % (10) 70 to 80% (5) 

viii Drinking water 10 No source (10) Problematic village (7.5) Partially covered (5) 

ix Degraded land 15 High – above 20 % (15) Medium – 10 to 20 % (10) 

x 

xi 

Productivity potential of the 

land 

Contiguity to another 

watershed that has already 

been developed/ treated 

15 

10 

Lands with low production & 

where productivity can be 

significantly enhanced with 

reasonable efforts (15) 

Contiguous to previously 

treated watershed & contiguity 

within the micro watersheds in 

Lands with moderate 

production & where 

productivity can be enhanced 

with reasonable efforts (10) 

Contiguity within the micro 

watersheds in the project but 

non contiguous to previously 

Low- less than 10 % of TGA 

(5) 

Lands with high production 

& where productivity can be 

marginally enhanced with 

reasonable efforts (5) 

Neither contiguous to 

previously treated 

watershed nor contiguity 

Above 70 

% 

(Reject) 

Fully 

covered 

(0)


xii 

xiii 

Cluster approach in the plains 

(more than one contiguous 

micro-watersheds in the 

project) 

Cluster approach in the hills 

(more than one contiguous 

micro-watersheds in the 

project) 

15 

15 

the project (10) treated watershed (5) within the micro 

watersheds in the project 

(0) 

Above 6 micro-watersheds in 

cluster (15) 

Above 5 micro-watersheds in 

cluster (15) 

4 to 6 micro watersheds in 

cluster (10) 


cluster (10) 


cluster (5) 


cluster (5) 

Total 150 150 90 41 2.5 

Project type: Hilly/desert/Other 

Table no.3: Watershed information 

Name of the project No. Of watersheds to be treated Watershed code Watershed regime/type/order 

IWMP 7 10 

5E2A1a1d, 5E2A1a1c, 5E2A1a1e, 5E2A1a1a, 5E1C4c2c, 

5E1C4c1c, 5E1C4a1a, 5E2A1a1b, 5E1C4b2b, 5E1C4a2c 

Mini watershed 

1.3 Other developmental programmes running in the project area 

Poverty in rural area has remained by and large, the main focal point of governments and development agencies. Sustainable rural development is the most effective 

way to eliminate this curse. To improve the livelihood of rural people, governments have allocated much fund for the rural areas. Constant efforts are being taken to 

ensure development of rural areas. So many state and central government’s projects and schemes are running in the project area as given in table no 4. 

Table no.4: Developmental programmes running in the project area: 

Sl Name of the 

Sponsoring agency 

Objectives of the programme/scheme 

no programme/scheme 

Government of India 

1 BRGF 

Year of 

commencement 

Villages 

covered 

Estimated number of 

beneficiaries 

Employment & Infrastructure 2006-07 16 Villager 

with World Bank 

2 IAY Government of India Development of Social Infrastructure 2006-07 16 BPL 

3 MGNREGA Government of India Employment Generation 2005-06 16 Villager 

4 SAY Government of Gujarat Development of Social Infrastructure 2006-07 16 BPL 

5 TSC Government of India Improve the sanitary facilities in the rural area 2006-07 16 Villager 

6 WASMO Government of Gujarat Safe Drinking water 2006-07 5 Villager 


Table no. 5: Previous Watershed programmes in the project area: 

Sl 

no 

Project 

name 

Year 

started 

Name of 

villages 

No. Of 

micro 

watershed 

Watershed 

codes 

Area 

under 

treatment 

Funding 

source 

Nodal 

agency 

PIA 

Total 

cost 

Expenditure 

incurred up 

to start of 

6IWMP 


% financial 

completion 

% physical 

completion 

Sarasva 

1 Pre- 2000- 

1 

500.00 

GLDC 30.00 23.97 79.90% 79.90% 

(N) 

Hariyali 2001 

2 Ditvas 1 500.00 GLDC 30.00 23.95 79.83 % 79.83 % 

2006- 

3 

07 

Moti Rath 1 500.00 

30.00 10.32 34.40% 34.40% 

5EB6 

GOI DWDU 

4 

Nani Rath 

192.06 11.52 11.52 100% 100% 

Hariyali 

TDO 

Karodia 

5 DPAP 2005- 

231.79 

Kadana 

(North) 1 

30.00 17.33 57.76% 57.76% 

06 

6 Sarsdi 267.21 

7 Rankpur 67.00 4.02 4.02 100% 100% 

Total 2258.06 



CHAPTER 2 

PROJECT IMPLEMENTING AGENCY 



2.1 Project Implementation Agency 

The Project Implementation Agency (PIA) is selected by an appropriate mechanism by Gujarat State Watershed Management Agency (GSWMA), the State Level 

Nodal Agency (SLNA) for Integrated Watershed Management Programme (IWMP) in Gujarat. The PIA is responsible for implementation of watershed project. This 

PIA may include relevant line department, autonomous organizations under State/ Central Government, Government Institutes/ Research bodies, Intermediate 

Panchayats, Voluntary Organizations (VOs). The PIA of IWMP 7 Project is District watershed development unit (DWDU), Panchmahal. 

2.2 Roles and Responsibilities of the PIA as per New Common Guideline - 2008 

The Project Implementing Agency (PIA) will provide necessary technical guidance to the Gram Panchayat for preparation of development plans for the watershed 

through Participatory Rural Appraisal (PRA) exercise, undertake community organization and training for the village communities, supervise watershed 

development activities, inspect and authenticate project accounts, encourage adoption of low cost technologies and build upon indigenous technical knowledge, 

monitor and review the overall project implementation and set up institutional arrangements for post-project operation and maintenance and further development 

of the assets created during the project period. PIA, after careful scrutiny, shall submit the Action Plan for Watershed Development Project for approval of the 

DWDU and other arrangements. (As per Para - 38) 

The PIA shall submit the periodical progress report to DWDU. The PIA shall also arrange physical, financial and social audit of the work undertaken. It will facilitate 

the mobilization of additional financial resources from other government programmes, such as NREGA, BRGF, SGRY, National Horticulture Mission, Tribal Welfare 

schemes, Artificial Ground Water Recharging, Greening India, etc. (As per Para - 39) 

2.3 District Watershed Development Unit, Panchmahal 

2.3.1 The organization and its objectives 

The District Watershed Development Unit (DWDU), Panchmahal is a district level nodal agency to oversee for the smooth implementation of watershed projects in 

the district. The District Development Officer (DDO) is the chairman of the DWDU. The DWDU has dedicated and experienced staff comprising one Project Director 

(Deputation from Gujarat Forest Department); a Technical Expert (on contractual basis) and Multidisciplinary Team (MDT) of civil Engineer, agriculture expert, and 

community mobilization expert, surveyor and computer operator. The remaining staff i.e. MIS coordinator, system analyst and accountant will be recruited for 

administration work. The objective of the DWDU Panchmahal are surveying, planning, implementing, documenting, and promoting watershed development projects 

and related development activities in the district. Moreover, the DWDU Panchmahal will work as a PIA for some IWMP projects. 



2.3.2 Programmes/project of DWDU Panchmahal 

At present eight IWMP projects have been sanctioned by Government of India for Panchmahal district. The entry point activities of all the eight IWMP projects have 

been identified by the respective PIAs in the district. Panchmahal Territorial Forestry Division as PIA for eight projects (IWMP 1 to 6, 10 and 11) and DWDU itself is 

PIA for the three projects (IWMP 7 to 9). 

Apart from IWMP projects, DWDU Panchmahal is involved in Pre-Hariyali and Hariyali projects (DPAP) and out of that all are still running in the district. The DWDU 

Panchmahal is also monitoring a central government sponsored scheme on “Artificial Recharge of Groundwater through Dug well” in the district. 

2.4 SWOT Analysis of the DWDU 

Strength: 

(1) Dedicated and experience staffs and multidisciplinary team 

(2) Independent District Level Nodal Agency 

(3) Strong linkages with national and state level institutions, agricultural universities and NGOs for capacity building and technical guidance 

(4) Scientific planning in watershed projects with the help of BISAG, Gandhinagar 

(5) District level monitoring coordination & cooperation Committee 

Weakness: 

(1) No permanent staff 

(2) No permanent office building 

Opportunities: 

(1) A number of different other development schemes of the government are running; so, there can be horizontal integration and convergence of programme 

(2) Better financial provision under IWMP 

(3) Usage of new technologies of watershed modelling and GPS for monitoring the watershed activities 

(4) Online IT connectivity for managing data cell for better transparency 



Threats: 

(1) Rainfall being very scarce and unreliable in the project area, the activities planned to be taken up may yield limited impact 

(2) Irregularities in fund flow can derail the smooth functioning 

(3) Lack of contribution and cooperation from local people 

(4) Low literacy rate in the project area 

(5) Local level conflicts and politics 

Table no. 6: PIA: 

Sl. No. Names of project Details of PIA 

(i) Type of organization Autonomous 

(ii) Name of organization DWDU Panchmahal 

1 IWMP 7 

(iii) Designation & Address PIA and Project Director, Prajapati faliya, Kadana 

(iv) Telephone (02675) 236066 

(v) Fax - 

(vi) E-mail iwmp7pia@gmail.com 

Table no. 7: Staff at PIA level: 

Sl 

Name Age Sex Designation Qualification Experience Job assigned 

no 

Monthly 

remuneration 

1 Mr K.T.Parmar 52 M Project Maneger & PIA Bsc (Agri) 30 Year Project Implementation 61000/- 

2 Mr Tejas Tank 26 M Technical Expert MBA 3 year Co-ordination 30250/- 

3 Mr V.H.Bhamaniya 37 M MDT Eng & PIA Nodal B.Tech (Agri.Eng.) 8 Year Co-ordination 18500/- 

4 Mr G.R.Taviyad 37 M WDT Engineer D.C.E. 8 Year Engineering work 12000/- 

5 Mr. D.J.Pargi 34 M WDT Agriculture BRS Agri 7 Year Agricultural work 8000/- 

6 Miss B.H.Solanki 25 F WDT Social Mobilize M.S.W. Fresh Community mobilization work 8000/- 

7 Mr A.N.Ninama 30 M Data Entry Operater P.G.D.C.A 5 Year Data Entry 5000/- 



CHAPTER 3 

BASIC INFORMATION OF THE PROJECT AREA 



3.1 Geography and Geo-hydrology 

3.1.1 Land use pattern 

By land use pattern we mean the distribution of land in accordance with its use or in the study of village land, we are concerned with surface utilisation. The concept 

of land use is a key concept for understanding rural land use. It includes many broad categories and their sub-division and level of management which may exist 

with certain defined types of land use. 

The total geographical area of Project is 8364.96 ha out of which 2116.22 ha (25.29 % of the total area) is under agriculture use and the cultivated lands of the 

village are very fertile and give better yield than the other lands. Most of the cultivable lands are used for double crops i.e. Kharif and Rabi. Still 1684.42 ha (79.59 % 

of the total area) is rainfed due to no assured irrigation facilities. There is 4040.42 ha forest area. The total cultivable wasteland and non-cultivable wasteland is 

298.90 ha and 2192.75 ha respectively. 

Table no. 8: Land use pattern: 

S. No. Names of villages 

Geographical Area of the Forest Land under 

Permanent 

Wasteland 

Rainfed area 

village 

Area agricultural use 

pastures Cultivable Non-cultivable 

1 Sarasva (N) 1470.5 0.00 211.00 0.00 0.00 0.93 1258.57 

2 Ditvas 1300.09 716.05 401.76 381.76 0.00 182.28 0.00 

3 Karvai 508.44 230.34 249.04 240.04 0.00 27.01 2.05 

4 Motirath 882.84 486.08 308.59 299.59 0.00 6.16 82.01 

5 Nanirath 462.06 219.42 105.21 83.21 0.00 3.01 134.42 

6 Bhul 169.57 86.11 60.00 41.00 0.00 0.60 22.86 

7 Nana Padadara 130.97 61.96 46.95 0.00 0.00 10.95 11.11 

8 Tarkoninal 259.72 224.07 28.55 8.55 0.00 3.22 3.88 

9 Ambuja 391.55 263.46 30.75 0.00 0.00 1.45 124.89 

10 Karodiya (N) 478.72 246.93 16.00 0.00 0.00 15.86 199.93 

11 Sarasdi 787.27 441.06 27.31 23.31 0.00 13.21 305.69 

12 Rakakot 152.57 112.02 27.70 17.70 0.00 12.85 0.00 

13 Jambunala 239.44 202.67 29.30 17.30 0.00 6.32 1.15 

14 Pacher 256.92 209.00 43.00 24.00 0.00 0.00 4.92 

15 Ghasvada 403.4 257.92 111.50 106.50 0.00 11.89 22.09 

16 Rankpur 470.9 283.33 165.23 156.23 0.00 3.16 19.18 



Total 8364.96 4040.42 2116.22 1684.42 0.0 298.90 2192.75 

3.1.2 Soil and topography 

Sarsva (N) watershed Programme comes under Middle Gujarat agro climatic zone. The soil is mainly Shallow black, Semi rockey and Semi loamy soil. Fine Loam is 

soil composed of sand, silt, and clay in relatively even concentration (about 40-40-20% concentration respectively), considered ideal for gardening and agricultural 

uses. Loam soils generally contain more nutrients and humus than sandy soils, have better infiltration and drainage than silty soils, and are easier to till than clay 

soils. These vary in depth from shallow to deep. The typical soil derived from the Deccan trap is the regur or Shallow Black, semi rockey and semi loamy soil. Manly 

black soil areas have a high degree of fertility. 

Table no. 9: Soil type and topography: 

S. No. Project Name 

Name of the Agro-climatic 

Names of the 

Major soil types 

b) Area in ha 

zone covers project area 

villages 

a)Type 

b) Area in ha 

Topography # 

1 

1470.50 Sarasva (N) 

1470.50 Hilly and 0-15% 

2 1300.09 Ditvas Shallow 

1300.09 Hilly and 0-15% 

3 508.44 Karvai Black,semi rockey 508.44 Hilly and 0-15% 

IWMP-7 

Middle Gujarat 

4 882.84 Motirath and semi loamy 882.84 Hilly and 0-20% 

5 462.06 Nanirath soil 

462.06 Hilly and 0-20% 

6 169.57 Bhul 169.57 Hilly and 0-25% 



7 130.97 Nana Padadara 130.97 Hilly and 0-25% 

8 259.72 Tarkoninal 259.72 Hilly and 0-25% 

9 391.55 Ambuja 391.55 Hilly and 0-25% 

10 478.72 Karodiya (N) 478.72 Hilly and 0-25% 

11 787.27 Sarasdi 787.27 Hilly and 0-25% 

12 152.57 Rakakot 152.57 Hilly and 0-25% 

13 239.44 Jambunala 239.44 Hilly and 0-10% 

14 256.92 Pacher 256.92 Hilly and 0-15% 

15 403.40 Ghasvada 403.40 Hilly and 0-10% 

16 470.90 Rankpur 470.90 Hilly and 0-15% 

# Flat, undulating, moderate slope, Steep slope 

Table no. 10: Flood and drought condition: 

Sl no Village Flood (Incidence) Drought (Incidence) 

1 Sarasva (N) - Once in 3 Year 

2 Ditvas - Once in 3 Year 

3 Karvai - Once in 3 Year 

4 Motirath Once in 4 Year Once in 3 Year 

5 Nanirath Once in 4 Year Once in 3 Year 

6 Bhul Once in 3 Year Once in 3 Year 

7 Nana Padadara Once in 3 Year Once in 3 Year 

8 Tarkoninal Once in 4 Year Once in 3 Year 

9 Ambuja Once in 4 Year Once in 3 Year 

10 Karodiya (N) Once in 4 Year Once in 3 Year 

11 Sarasdi Once in 4 Year Once in 3 Year 

12 Rakakot - Once in 3 Year 

13 Jambunala - Once in 3 Year 

14 Pacher Once in 3 Year Once in 3 Year 

15 Ghasvada - Once in 3 Year 

16 Rankpur - Once in 3 year 

3.2 Edaphic factor 

An edaphic factor relating to the physical or chemical composition of the soil found in a particular area. For example, very alkaline soil may be an edaphic factor 

limiting the variety of plants growing in a region. Edaphic factors that influence soil organisms are derived from the development of soils and are both physical and 

biological (e.g. mineral and humus content, and pH). 



3.2.1 Soil erosion 

Erosion is the process of weathering and transport of solids (sediment, soil, rock and other particles) in the natural environment or their source and deposits them 

elsewhere. It usually occurs due to transport by wind, water, or ice; by down-slope creep of soil and other material under the force of gravity; or by living organisms, 

such as burrowing animals, in the case of bio erosion. 

As per above mentioned Land use pattern (Table no 8), soil properties and topography (Table no 9) soil erosion is generally through water. And geographically 

project area is almost flat so runoff of rain fall is main cause of erosion. There is no wind erosion. In the water erosion; splash erosion impinges on 72 to 78 % of 

total project area by detachment and airborne movement of small soil particles caused by the impact of raindrops on soil. Rill erosion impinges on 12 to 18 % of the 

total area by the development of small, ephemeral concentrated flow paths, which function as both sediment source and sediment delivery systems for erosion. This 

is typically found in channels of streams and rivers. Gully erosion impinges on 8 to 12 % of the total area; this is occurred when water flows in narrow channels 

during or immediately after heavy rains. There is no ravenous in the project area. Tillage and cropping practices, as well a land management practices, directly affect 

the overall soil erosion problems on a farm. Certain conservation measures can reduce soil erosion. For example, Farm bunding, earthen dam, check wall, gully 

plugs, loose boulder checks may be considered. 

11. Edaphic Factors 

Table no. 11.1: Soil Erosion 

Project name Cause Type of erosion Area affected (ha) Run off (mm/ year) 

IWMP 7 

3.2.2 Soil Salinity 


Average soil loss (Tonnes/ 

ha/ year) 

Water erosion 

A Sheet 5018.97 

B Rill 1003.79 

C Gully 669.20 

278 5 to 10 

D Ravenous 0.00 

Wind erosion 0.00 

Total 6691.96 278 

The Saline soil has excessive concentration of natural soluble salts, mainly of chlorides, sulphates and carbonates of calcium, magnesium and sodium. The total 

concentration of salts is estimated by way of electrical conductivity. If the electric conductivity (EC) of soil extract is more than 4 dS/m, they are called "saline soils". 

They are also called “white alkali” soils. In arid regions, where evaporation exceeds the precipitation, the soluble salts accumulate near the soil surface. Soil


Salinization in the coastal area is due to the accumulation of salts from the inundated seawater. Irrigation water contains a high concentration of soluble salts; 

particularly sodium salts which lead to salinity. 

Table no. 11.2: Soil Salinity/Alkalinity (Salinity ingress) 

Name of the Village Survey Number Soil pH Type of Salinity (Inherent/Ingress) 

IWMP-7 - 6 to 8 Inherent 

Table no. 11.3: Waterlogging Conditions 

Name of the Village Survey Number Reasons 

Motirath - Catchment Area of Kadana Dam 

Nanirath - Catchment Area of Kadana Dam 

Aamboja - Catchment Area of Kadana Dam 

Karodiya (N) - Catchment Area of Kadana Dam 

Sarasdi - Catchment Area of Kadana Dam 

Pacher - Catchment Area of Kadana Dam 

3.3 Rainfall vs Runoff 

As 79.59 % project area lays under rainfed; so rainfall is major factor for crop productivity and also indirectly affected livelihood of the villager. Irregularity in 

rainfall is major problem of farmers for success of better productivity even though fertile soil for crop. The rainfall is scanty which has resulted in recurrent 

phenomenon of drought in every two to three years. The average rainfall of this area is about 804 mm (from past five year data). As Topography of project area is 

hilly so runoff of rainfall water through 1st order stream (Naali) then 2nd order Stream (Nala) and 3rd order Stream (Nadi). 

Table no. 12: Climatic conditions: 

Average temperature ( o c) 

Name of project Year Average rainfall- last 5 years 

Summer 

Winter 

Max Min Max Min 

2007 1187 mm 43 26 36 16 

IWMP-7 

2008 699mm 42 25 37 17 

2009 778mm 40 24 35 18 

2010 660mm 41 25 35 17 

2011 695mm 40 24 36 18 



Table no. 13: Physiography and relief 

Village name Elevation (mt) Slope range (%) Major streams 

Sarasva (N) 125 0-15 Ctachment of Kadana Dam 

Ditvas 123 0-15 Ctachment of Kadana Dam 

Karvai 104 0-15 Ctachment of Kadana Dam 

Motirath 174 0-20 Ctachment of Kadana Dam 

Nanirath 97 0-20 Mahi River 

Bhul 105 0-25 Mahi River 

Nana Padadara 134 0-25 Ctachment of Kadana Dam 

Tarkoninal 119 0-25 Mahi River 

Ambuja 114 0-25 Mahi River 

Karodiya (N) 104 0-25 Mahi River 

Sarasdi 129 0-25 Ctachment of Kadana Dam 

Rakakot 102 0-25 Mahi River 

Jambunala 98 0-10 Mahi River 

Pacher 101 0-15 Mahi River 

Ghasvada 98 0-10 Mahi River 

Rankpur 101 0-15 Mahi River 

3.4 Land and Agriculture 

Land resource is more important to the people whose livelihood depend on agriculture. As agriculture output purely depends on land resource. Thus, lack of access 

to land increases incidence of poverty in rural areas. In rural areas, land ownership has a social value and serves as a security for credit, natural hazards or life 

contingencies, and also adds to the social status. Shallow black and red soils are the two most important soil groups for agricultural production that are found in the 

project area. These are considered good for cultivation of Maize, Paddy, Tur in Kharif and Wheat, Gram in Rabi. The land conservation measure such as earthen 

bund in the area some farm will conserve Land from soil erosion and Khet Talavli help for irrigation in Rabi crop of Gram or wheat in the residual moisture. 

Table no. 14: Land ownership details 

Sl no 

Village 

Total owned land 

HHs giving land HHs taking land 

Gen OBC SC ST 

on lease 

on lease 

1 Sarasva (N) 0.00 0.00 189.85 1280.65 0 0 

2 Ditvas 0.00 0.00 129.70 454.34 0 0 

3 Karvai 0.00 0.00 132.30 146.00 0 0 

4 Motirath 0.00 0.00 169.50 227.26 0 0 

5 Nanirath 0.00 0.00 3.29 242.64 0 0 



6 Bhul 0.00 0.00 0.00 80.17 0 0 

7 Nana Padadara 0.00 0.00 0.00 69.01 0 0 

8 Tarkoninal 0.00 0.00 0.00 35.65 0 0 

9 Ambuja 0.00 0.00 0.00 128.09 0 0 

10 Karodiya (N) 0.00 0.00 0.00 231.39 0 0 

11 Sarasdi 0.00 0.00 0.00 346.21 0 0 

12 Rakakot 0.00 0.00 0.00 40.55 0 0 

13 Jambunala 0.00 0.00 0.00 36.77 0 0 

14 Pacher 0.00 0.00 2.19 45.73 0 0 

15 Ghasvada 0.00 0.00 0.00 145.48 0 0 

16 Rankpur 0.00 0.00 116.80 70.77 0 0 

Total 0.00 0.00 743.63 3580.71 0 0 

Table no. 15: Agriculture 

Sl no 

Village 

Net sown area 

One time Two times Three times 

1 Sarasva (N) 211.00 12.00 0 

2 Ditvas 401.76 17.00 0 

3 Karvai 249.04 7.00 0 

4 Motirath 308.59 1.00 0 

5 Nanirath 105.21 7.00 0 

6 Bhul 60.00 8.00 0 

7 Nana Padadara 46.95 5.00 0 

8 Tarkoninal 28.55 5.00 0 

9 Ambuja 30.75 3.00 0 

10 Karodiya (N) 16.00 5.00 0 

11 Sarasdi 27.31 3.00 0 

12 Rakakot 27.70 2.00 0 

13 Jambunala 29.30 5.00 0 

14 Pacher 43.00 5.00 0 

15 Ghasvada 111.50 10.00 0 

16 Rankpur 165.23 24.00 0 

Total 1861.89 119.00 0 

Table no. 16: Irrigation 

Sl 

no 

Village 

Availability 

months 


Source 1 : Canal Source 2 : Check dam / Pond Source 3 : Well 

Availability 

Availability 

Net area Gross area 

Net area Gross area 

Net area 

months 

months 

Gross area



1 Sarasva (N) 0 0.00 0.00 2 10.00 10.00 2 2.00 2.00 

2 Ditvas 0 0.00 0.00 2 15.00 15.00 2 2.00 2.00 

3 Karvai 0 0.00 0.00 2 5.00 5.00 2 2.00 2.00 

4 Motirath 0 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 2 1.00 1.00 

5 Nanirath 0 0.00 0.00 2 2.00 2.00 2 5.00 5.00 

6 Bhul 0 0.00 0.00 2 3.00 3.00 2 5.00 5.00 

7 Nana Padadara 0 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 2 5.00 5.00 

8 Tarkoninal 0 0.00 0.00 2 5.00 5.00 0 0.00 0.00 

9 Ambuja 0 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 2 3.00 3.00 

10 Karodiya (N) 0 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 2 5.00 5.00 

11 Sarasdi 0 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 2 3.00 3.00 

12 Rakakot 0 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 2 2.00 2.00 

13 Jambunala 0 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 2 5.00 5.00 

14 Pacher 0 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 2 5.00 5.00 

15 Ghasvada 0 0.00 0.00 2 5.00 5.00 2 5.00 5.00 

16 Rankpur 0 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 2 4.00 4.00 

Table no. 17: Crop details: 

Sl 

no 

Village 

Kharif (Monsoon) 

Crop 1 Maize Crop 2 Panddy Crop 3 Tur 

Area Production Productivity Area Production Productivity Area Production Productivity 

1 Sarasva (N) 150 120000 800 50 35000 700 11 2750 250 

2 Ditvas 175 138250 790 170 119000 700 57 14190 250 

3 Karvai 150 118350 789 70 49000 700 29 7260 250 

4 Motirath 200 162000 810 75 48750 650 34 8230 245 

5 Nanirath 60 48000 800 30 19500 650 15 3650 240 

6 Bhul 30 23700 790 20 12000 600 10 2350 235 

7 Nana Padadara 25 19725 789 15 9000 600 7 1703 245 

8 Tarkoninal 15 12000 800 10 5750 575 4 834 235 

9 Ambuja 18 14220 790 10 5500 550 3 633 230 

10 Karodiya (N) 8 6312 789 7 3675 525 1 225 225 

11 Sarasdi 14 11200 800 10 5250 525 3 794 240 

12 Rakakot 14 11270 805 10 5750 575 4 870 235 

13 Jambunala 15 12000 800 10 5750 575 4 1032 240 

14 Pacher 20 15900 795 15 8250 550 8 1840 230 

15 Ghasvada 65 52325 805 35 24500 700 12 2875 250 

16 Rankpur 80 64000 800 70 49000 700 15 3808 250 

Sl Village Rabi (Winter)


no Crop 1 Wheat Crop 2 Gram Crop 3 

Area Production Productivity Area Production Productivity Area Production Productivity 

1 Sarasva (N) 25 625000 25000 15 1875 125 0 0 0 

2 Ditvas 22 471900 21450 25 3125 125 0 0 0 

3 Karvai 10 95000 9500 5 625 125 0 0 0 

4 Motirath 8 59200 7400 3 375 125 0 0 0 

5 Nanirath 5 23750 4750 2 250 125 0 0 0 

6 Bhul 4 14400 3600 3 375 125 0 0 0 

7 Nana Padadara 4 14800 3700 5 625 125 0 0 0 

8 Tarkoninal 3 6300 2100 0 0 125 0 0 0 

9 Ambuja 3 6525 2175 0 0 125 0 0 0 

10 Karodiya (N) 3 6300 2100 0 0 125 0 0 0 

11 Sarasdi 4 12800 3200 3 375 125 0 0 0 

12 Rakakot 4 14400 3600 0 0 125 0 0 0 

13 Jambunala 5 21250 4250 5 625 125 0 0 0 

14 Pacher 3 7200 2400 0 0 125 0 0 0 

15 Ghasvada 7 49000 7000 0 0 125 0 0 0 

16 Rankpur 5 25000 5000 0 0 125 0 0 0 

3.5 Comparative data of the crop productivity of the project area 

“The term productivity in general means the total output per unit of factor input. For example land productivity means output per hectare of land. Productivity is an 

average and is calculated by dividing the total output of a particular crop by the total cultivated area under that crop.” Data are made available by the Baseline 

survey (for Villages and project area), Handbook of Agriculture, ICAR publication 2006(For Gujarat and India), and Final district plan (DAP) of Dept. of Agriculture 

(for Panchmahal). The results indicate that project villages have poor productivity compared to India, Gujarat and district. The Project area comes under middle 

Gujarat. So farmers grow crop according to the rainfall. If they get good rainfall they generally grow high value crops. So we can say that monsoon decides cropping 

patterns of project area. 

Major limitations reduce crop productivity; there are number of factors which have time and again affected productivity. 

i) Depletion of water table 

Due to scanty and insufficient rainfall and continuous discharge from underground water resources, there is depletion of water table. This adds to the cost of 

irrigation from tube wells. 

ii) Irregularity of rainfall 



This is a major problem. Even in good years, there is a gap between two spells of rainfall – sometimes exceeding one month or there is delayed rainfall or 

missing last round of rains in September. 

iii) Recurrent droughts 

This happens at least thrice in a decade. Sometimes there are two recurring droughts. Many times, two-thirds of the state gets affected. During the second 

spell, the entire agriculture fails, often pushing even a well-to-do farmer below poverty line. 

iv) Increase in operation cost 

The cost of farming is going up due to rise in labour cost, Fuel cost etc. 

v) Inherent Soil Salinity 

Soil salinity is one of the major constraints in development of agriculture. 

vi) Lack of other facilities such as storage and marketing 

5-10% of agriculture product damage after harvesting due to scarcity of proper storage and proper market for sale. So he sells to local traders at the low 

prices. Farmers mainly face proper means of transportation and roads. And second problem is farmers don’t have proper storage facilities. 



3.6 Livestock 

In the project area total 1471 buffaloes, 208 cows, 4320 goats, and 3697 bullocks. Most of farmers having buffaloes and cows for overcome need of milk and organic 

manure for farm; and Majority of trible community depends on goat and sheep rearing for their livelihood. Milk production is comparative poor. Milching animal 

rearing is one of suitable alternative option for livelihood. 

Table no. 18: Livestock 

Sl no Village 

Buffalo Cow Total Milk 

Goat 

No milk No Milk (Buffalo+Cow) No Milk 

Sheep Bullock Hen Others 

1 Sarasva (N) 250 100 10 5 105 700 0 0 800 1500 0 

2 Ditvas 300 160 45 10 170 735 0 0 660 1200 0 

3 Karvai 234 165 14 4 169 465 0 0 300 800 0 

4 Motirath 160 35 18 5 40 625 0 0 367 731 0 

5 Nanirath 70 15 15 3 18 164 0 0 168 256 0 

6 Bhul 25 5 10 3 8 138 0 0 88 103 0 

7 Nana Padadara 30 8 10 4 12 218 0 0 138 211 0 

8 Tarkoninal 55 5 18 4 9 327 0 0 168 328 0 

9 Ambuja 15 3 10 2 5 118 0 0 56 151 0 

10 Karodiya (N) 27 7 6 1 8 108 0 0 62 127 0 

11 Sarasdi 30 5 10 3 8 250 0 0 180 152 0 

12 Rakakot 60 18 15 5 23 88 0 0 97 193 0 

13 Jambunala 45 15 9 3 18 113 0 0 112 158 0 

14 Pacher 15 5 5 1 6 56 0 0 98 196 0 

15 Ghasvada 70 30 5 0 30 60 0 0 210 191 0 

16 Rankpur 85 25 8 1 26 155 0 0 193 169 0 

Total 1471 601 208 54 655 4320 0 0 3697 6466 0 



3.7 Quality of Drinking water 

Drinking water availability is 10 to 11 months in the project area. Mainly sources of drinking water are well and hand pump. Drinking water quality is Brackish. As 

TDS is between 500 to 30000 milli grame/liter. Ph is approximately near to 7 which are showing neutral quality. “Brackish water is water that has more salinity 

than fresh water, but not as much as seawater. It may result from mixing of seawater with fresh water, as in estuaries, or it may occur in brackish fossil aquifers. The 

word comes from the Middle Dutch root ""brak,"" meaning ""salten"" or ""salty"". Technically, brackish water contains between 0.5 and 30 grams of salt per litre 

more often expressed as 0.5 to 30 parts per thousand (ppt or %). 

Table no. 19: Drinking water 

Sl no Village Ground water table (mt) Source of drinking water Availability in months Quality 

1 Sarasva (N) 8 .00 Open Well/Hand Pump 8 to 10 Brackish 

2 Ditvas 8.50 Open Well/Hand Pump 8 to 10 Brackish 

3 Karvai 7.50 Open Well/Hand Pump 8 to 10 Brackish 

4 Motirath 11.50 Open Well/Hand Pump 8 to 9 Brackish 

5 Nanirath 8.50 Open Well/Hand Pump 8 to 10 Brackish 

6 Bhul 10.50 Open Well/Hand Pump 8 to 9 Brackish 

7 Nana Padadara 10.50 Open Well/Hand Pump 8 to 9 Brackish 

8 Tarkoninal 12.75 Open Well/Hand Pump 7 to 8 Brackish 

9 Amboja 7.50 Open Well/Hand Pump 8 to 10 Brackish 

10 Karodiya (N) 6.50 Open Well/Hand Pump 8 to 10 Brackish 

11 Sarasdi 9.50 Open Well/Hand Pump 8 to 10 Brackish 

12 Rakakot 10.50 Open Well/Hand Pump 7 to 8 Brackish 

13 Jambunala 8.50 Open Well/Hand Pump 8 to 10 Brackish 

14 Pacher 8.50 Open Well/Hand Pump 8 to 10 Brackish 

15 Ghasvada 9.50 Open Well/Hand Pump 8 to 10 Brackish 

16 Rankpur 10.50 Open Well/Hand Pump 8 to 10 Brackish 

Table no. 20: Details of Common Property Resources 

S. 

No. 

Names of 

project 


Total Area (ha) 

CPR 

Area owned/ In possession of 

Area available for treatment (ha) 

Particulars 

Pvt. 

Govt. 

Any other Pvt. 

Govt. 

Any other (Pl. 

PRI 

PRI 

persons (specify deptt.) (Pl. Specify) persons (specify deptt.) 

Specify) 

Wasteland/ degraded land 0 2491.65 0 0 0 2491.65 0 0 

Pastures 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

Orchards 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

Village Woodlot 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 


3.8 Socio-Economic Profile 

3.8.1 Demographic status 



Forest 0 4040.42 0 0 0 4040.42 0 0 

Village Ponds/ Tanks 0 32 0 0 0 32 0 0 

Community Buildings 0 55 0 0 0 55 0 0 

Weekly Markets 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

Permanent markets 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

Temples/ Places of worship 0 28 0 0 0 28 0 0 

Others (Pl. specify) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

Total population of Project area is 20740 out of it 11072 males and 9668 females. Sex ratio is 873 in project area. Total household of project area is 3655 nos. 

Mostly Population is ST and SC as shown in table no 21. Literacy rate is very poor due to trible region and Migration. It is common knowledge that migration of 

people is moving out of their villages and reaching nearby or remote destinations in search of gainful work Migration is a typical phenomenon. The phenomenon of 

out – migration from villages is commonly observed though available data and information are too scanty and sketch to present in this report. Development of 

agriculture and animal husbandry is so backward as to compel farmers – even small and marginal farmers or even agricultural laborers in times failure of monsoon 

and the resultant drought conditions to leave their villages and migrate to out side places in search of jobs. There are hardly any employment opportunities in farm, 

non – farm and service sectors to any considerable extend in the district both during agricultural season as well as off-season. There are also a fair number of 

persons who migrate into this district in search of jobs and labour (skilled or unskilled) work. People migrate during summer season to different parts of the state 

like Rajkot, Junagadh and Jamnagar for agricultural labour work, same as for Surat, Navsari, Kheda, Ahmedabad as daily wagers and Diamond workers. For better 

scope and standard of living; some people permanently migrate to taluka or district place also. 

Table no. 21: Demographic information 

Sl 

Population SC ST 

Village 

no 

Total Male Female Total Male Female % Total Male Female % 

1 Sarasva (N) 3698 1799 1899 180 82 98 4.86 3338 1634 1704 90.26 

2 Ditvas 4937 3030 1907 43 19 24 0.87 3504 1817 1617 70.97 

3 Karvai 1597 801 796 65 27 38 4.07 1449 735 714 90.73 

4 Motirath 2165 1126 1039 69 33 32 3.18 2069 1070 999 95.56 

5 Nanirath 1238 638 600 0 0 0 0.00 1231 660 571 99.43 

6 Bhul 773 372 401 9 4 5 1.16 667 324 343 86.28 

7 Nana Padadara 333 174 159 0 0 0 0.00 333 174 159 100.00 

8 Tarkoninal 941 498 443 0 0 0 0.00 898 472 426 95.43 

9 Ambuja 254 127 127 0 0 0 0.00 254 127 127 100.00


10 Karodiya (N) 475 245 230 0 0 0 0.00 475 245 230 100.00 

11 Sarasdi 1077 559 518 0 0 0 0.00 1070 557 513 99.35 

12 Rakakot 239 125 114 0 0 0 0.00 233 122 111 97.48 

13 Jambunala 294 149 145 0 0 0 0.00 291 147 144 98.97 

14 Pacher 385 198 187 3 2 1 0.77 382 196 186 99.22 

15 Ghasvada 936 490 446 0 0 0 0.00 929 486 443 99.25 

16 Rankpur 1398 741 657 39 19 20 2.78 1341 714 627 95.92 

Total 20740 11072 9668 408 186 218 18464 9480 8914 

Table no. 22: Literacy rate 

Sl 

Literacy 

Village 

no 

Total % Male % Female % 

Literacy % above age 14 Literacy % below age 14 

1 Sarasva (N) 1195 32.31 846 70.79 349 28.36 22 78 

2 Ditvas 1529 30.97 1081 70.69 448 29.30 19 81 

3 Karvai 569 37.31 394 69.24 175 30.75 23 77 

4 Motirath 723 33.39 542 74.96 181 25.03 21 79 

5 Nanirath 481 38.85 339 70.47 142 29.52 25 75 

6 Bhul 242 31.30 173 71.48 69 28.51 20 80 

7 Nana Padadara 144 43.24 98 68.05 46 31.94 34 66 

8 Tarkoninal 407 43.25 283 69.53 124 30.46 33 67 

9 Ambuja 85 33.46 60 70.58 25 29.41 27 73 

10 Karodiya (N) 195 41.05 140 71.79 55 28.20 31 69 

11 Sarasdi 436 40.48 297 68.11 136 31.19 29 71 

12 Rakakot 116 48.53 75 64.65 41 35.34 34 66 

13 Jambunala 128 43.53 78 60.93 50 39.06 33 67 

14 Pacher 136 35.32 95 69.85 41 30.14 28 72 

15 Ghasvada 459 49.03 311 67.75 148 32.24 37 63 

16 Rankpur 620 44.34 436 70.32 184 29.67 33 67 

Table no. 23: Migration details 

Migration 

Migration by months 

Sl 

Total 

Main reason for 

Village 

Up to 3 

More than 6 

no 

population Total Male Female 

3-6 months 

migration 

months 

months 

1 Sarasva (N) 3698 690 435 255 414 207 69 Saurastra – 

2 Ditvas 4937 838 515 323 502 251 85 

Agrilabour 

3 Karvai 1597 308 188 120 184 92 32 Ahmedabad , 

4 Motirath 2165 1225 638 587 735 367 123 

Modasa – 

5 Nanirath 1238 278 168 110 166 50 62 casual labour 


Income during 

migration / 

month 

3000/-to 

4000/-

6 Bhul 773 168 90 78 100 51 17 Surat Casual 

7 Nana Padadara 333 180 118 62 108 54 18 

labour 

8 Tarkoninal 941 242 152 90 145 72 25 

9 Ambuja 254 130 85 45 78 39 13 

10 Karodiya (N) 475 228 162 66 136 40 52 

11 Sarasdi 1077 324 215 109 194 58 72 

12 Rakakot 239 178 112 66 106 53 19 

13 Jambunala 294 98 59 39 58 30 10 

14 Pacher 385 198 128 70 118 59 21 

15 Ghasvada 936 212 162 50 127 63 22 

16 Rankpur 1398 394 280 114 236 118 40 

Total 20740 5691 3507 2184 3407 1604 680 


Table no. 24: Poverty 

Sl no Village Total Household 

BPL 

0-16 16-20 Total 

% of BPL HH Total Land less HH % of land less HH 

1 Sarasva (N) 575 85 32 117 20.34 15 2.60 

2 Ditvas 730 61 164 225 10.27 8 1.09 

3 Karvai 282 220 87 307 38.65 2 0.70 

4 Motirath 378 187 159 346 30.68 0 0 

5 Nanirath 235 193 55 248 35.31 0 0 

6 Bhul 173 76 77 153 29.47 0 0 

7 Nana Padadara 72 23 17 40 20.83 0 0 

8 Tarkoninal 222 112 76 188 27.92 0 0 

9 Ambuja 62 40 26 66 33.87 0 0 

10 Karodiya (N) 89 93 28 121 47.19 0 0 

11 Sarasdi 208 66 85 151 25.00 0 0 

12 Rakakot 44 21 12 33 25.00 0 0 

13 Jambunala 74 18 11 29 16.21 0 0 

14 Pacher 75 01 23 24 10.66 0 0 

15 Ghasvada 173 13 104 117 22.54 0 0 

16 Rankpur 263 31 153 184 23.95 0 0 

Total 3655 1654 1291 2945 25 4.39 



3.8.2 Infrastructure facilities 

The project area is well connected with Kadana taluka with pucca roads. The villages have fully electricity connectivity. Most of villages have an Anganvadi, primary 

school and higher secondary school is only in Ditvas. Post office is available in Sarasva (N), Ditvas, Moti rath and Sarasdi village. Ditvas and Rankpur have Milk 

collection center. Nearest market yard is available in kadana city only. 

Table no. 25: Village infrastructure 

Pucca 

road to 

Sl 

Village the 

no 

village 

(Y/N) 

Schools 

LP UP HS 


Colleges 

(Number) 

Post Office 

(Distance) 

Banks 

(Number) 

Distance 

from 

nearest 

market 

yard 

Milk 

collection 

centre 

(Number) 

Milk 

cooperativ 

e 

(Number) 

Other 

cooperatives 

/ CBIs 

(Number) 

1 Sarasva (N) Y 1 1 0 0 1 0 38 0 0 0 0 

2 Ditvas Y 1 1 1 0 1 0 48 1 0 0 0 

3 Karvai Y 1 0 0 0 0 0 36 0 0 0 0 

4 Motirath Y 1 1 0 0 1 0 38 0 0 0 0 

5 Nanirath Y 1 0 0 0 0 0 34 0 0 0 0 

6 Bhul Y 1 0 0 0 0 0 28 0 0 0 0 

7 Nana Padadara Y 1 0 0 0 0 0 26 0 0 0 0 

8 Tarkoninal Y 1 1 0 0 0 0 30 0 0 0 0 

9 Ambuja N 1 0 0 0 0 0 24 0 0 0 0 

10 Karodiya (N) N 1 0 0 0 0 0 36 0 0 0 0 

11 Sarasdi Y 1 0 0 0 1 0 38 0 0 0 0 

12 Rakakot Y 1 0 0 0 0 0 25 0 0 0 0 

13 Jambunala Y 0 0 0 0 0 0 24 0 0 0 0 

14 Pacher N 1 0 0 0 0 0 30 0 0 0 0 

15 Ghasvada Y 1 1 0 0 0 0 22 0 0 0 0 

16 Rankpur Y 1 0 0 0 0 0 22 1 0 0 0 

Table no. 26 : Facilities / HH assets 

Sl 

no 

Village 

HHs with 

electricity 

HHs with 

safety 

latrines 

HHs with phones 

HHs with vehicle 

Land line Mobile 2-wheeler 4-wheeler 

HHs with 

TV set 

HHs with 

cooking gas 

HHs with 

Drinking 

water 

1 Sarasva (N) 555 158 0 1298 125 10 215 15 0 0 

2 Ditvas 705 252 0 1937 158 15 165 25 0 0 

3 Karvai 265 145 0 997 115 09 110 16 0 0 

4 Motirath 340 48 0 965 95 12 25 10 0 0 

Any other 

institution 

HHs 

with 

freedge


5 Nanirath 215 28 0 938 25 03 10 05 0 0 

6 Bhul 145 25 0 473 19 02 15 07 0 0 

7 Nana Padadara 58 05 0 233 10 01 07 02 0 0 

8 Tarkoninal 190 15 0 641 30 02 12 05 0 0 

9 Ambuja 28 02 0 54 01 00 01 01 0 0 

10 Karodiya (N) 68 03 0 175 02 00 02 05 0 0 

11 Sarasdi 197 29 0 777 55 05 30 25 0 0 

12 Rakakot 39 22 0 139 29 02 11 07 0 0 

13 Jambunala 72 26 0 194 11 02 09 10 0 0 

14 Pacher 30 04 0 185 02 00 02 05 0 0 

15 Ghasvada 158 58 0 636 57 10 35 35 0 0 

16 Rankpur 240 37 0 998 53 07 32 32 0 0 

Table no. 27: Per capita Income 

Sl no Village Agriculture Forestry Animal husbandry Casual labour Services Handicraft Others Total 

1 Sarasva (N) 15000 0 50 1500 2000 0 1500 20050 

2 Ditvas 14500 0 60 1800 2200 0 1650 20210 

3 Karvai 13000 0 0 2200 1400 0 1300 17900 

4 Motirath 12000 0 0 2400 1500 0 1450 17350 

5 Nanirath 12500 0 0 1800 1450 0 1150 16900 

6 Bhul 13500 0 0 1900 1250 0 1250 17900 

7 Nana Padadara 12000 0 0 1850 850 0 1200 15900 

8 Tarkoninal 11000 0 0 2500 1400 0 1250 16150 

9 Ambuja 10000 0 0 1600 500 0 1000 13100 

10 Karodiya (N) 11500 0 0 2000 500 0 1050 15050 

11 Sarasdi 12000 0 0 1850 1800 0 1250 16900 

12 Rakakot 11500 0 30 1700 1350 0 1350 15930 

13 Jambunala 13500 0 35 1900 800 0 1250 17485 

14 Pacher 12000 0 0 1750 500 0 1300 15550 

15 Ghasvada 14000 0 45 1650 1700 0 1250 18645 

16 Rankpur 13500 0 40 1750 1550 0 1350 18190 

Project average 12594 0 16 1884 1297 0 1284 17076 

Table no.28: Dependence on Forest/CPR 

Sl no 

Village 

Benefit type 1 Benefit type 2 Benefit type 2 

% sells Income % sells Income % sells Income 

Total income 

1 Sarasva (N) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

2 Ditvas 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 



3 Karvai 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

4 Motirath 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

5 Nanirath 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

6 Bhul 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

7 Nana Padadara 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

8 Tarkoninal 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

9 Ambuja 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

10 Karodiya (N) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

11 Sarasdi 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

12 Rakakot 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

13 Jambunala 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

14 Pacher 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

15 Ghasvada 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

16 Rankpur 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

3.8.3 Livelihood pattern 

Agriculture, Casual labour, and Animal Husbandry are basic occupation in the project area. Income from agriculture is comparative batter due to good productivity 

but still it is not up to mark. Animal husbandry is Subsidiary occupation of many farmers. Labour are not getting work round the year so during off-season so they 

are migrate to other place for better employment for more than 210 days. New livelihood opportunities for asset less can reduce migration of people. 

Table no. 29: Livelihood pattern (Occupational distribution) 

Sl no Village Total workforce Agriculture Animal husbandry (AH) Agriculture + AH Casual labour Services Handicraft Others 

1 Sarasva (N) 2218 2041 15 1939 76 35 0 52 

2 Ditvas 2962 2725 20 2589 103 45 0 69 

3 Karvai 958 881 0 837 28 20 0 29 

4 Motirath 1299 1195 0 1135 43 22 0 39 

5 Nanirath 742 683 0 649 22 15 0 22 

6 Bhul 463 426 0 405 13 10 0 14 

7 Nana Padadara 199 183 0 174 5 5 0 6 

8 Tarkoninal 546 502 0 477 7 20 0 16 

9 Ambuja 152 140 0 133 7 1 0 5 

10 Karodiya (N) 285 262 0 249 13 1 0 9 

11 Sarasdi 646 594 0 565 2 30 0 19 

12 Rakakot 143 126 0 120 1 15 0 1 

13 Jambunala 176 162 0 154 4 5 0 5 

14 Pacher 231 213 0 202 10 2 0 7 



15 Ghasvada 561 516 0 490 9 30 0 6 

16 Rankpur 836 769 0 731 17 25 0 25 

Total 12417 11418 35 10849 360 281 0 324 



CHAPTER 4 

WATERSHED DEVELOPMENT WORK 



4. Watershed Activities 

Watershed Management as a strategy has been adopted by Government of India especially in the rainfed area of semi-arid tropics. These areas are characterized by 

low and undependable rain, low soil fertility low literacy rate, migration, less knowledge about new technology used in agriculture and many more. Several studies 

identified that there is a dire need of a systematic and scientific approach to deal with watershed development. The common guidelines generate a fresh and flexible 

framework for the next generation watershed development. 

4.1 Scientific Planning 

(I) Cluster Approach 

The new approach envisages a broader vision of geo-hydrological units normally of average size of 1,000 to 5,000 hectares comprising of clusters of microwatersheds. 

Sarsava (N) project consist of ten micro-watersheds with 5E2A1a1d, 5E2A1a1c, 5E2A1a1e, 5E2A1a1a, 5E1C4c2c, 5E1C4c1c, 5E1C4a1a, 

5E2A1a1b, 5E1C4b2b, 5E1C4a2c as their respective codes. 

(II) Baseline Survey 

To access the impact if any watershed development programs a detailed baseline survey has to be conducted. This acts a benchmark for any intervention during and 

post implementation of any development program. A detailed baseline survey was conducted which involved household census survey, Bio- physical survey and 

Village level data from Talati cum Mantri. Household census survey includes a detailed questionnaire which was been filled by visiting each and every housed hold 

in the village. This gave in the details of the demographic profile of the literacy percentage, SC/ST population, number of BPL household, cattle population, and net 

consumption rate in the village, average milk production of the cattle and various schemes running and their benefits. 

(III) Technical survey 

Technical survey or Bio-physical survey was conducted to identify various natural resources available in the village. It included the soil typology, well in the area, 

crop taken in the field, cropping pattern, fertilizer used and various sources of irrigation in the field. Existing structure in field and site for new structure can be 

identifying by this survey. 

(IV) Participatory Rural Appraisal (PRA) 



The past experience of watershed has given tremendous input to focus on creating accountability of the stakeholders towards the program. This has created an 

emphasis to include all the stakeholder communities and their local Indigenous technological Knowledge (ITK) while planning for any activity. Participatory 

approach provides a new path for planning, implementing, monitoring and post-withdrawal activities with a complete accountability of the stakeholders. Various 

PRA techniques like resource mapping, social mapping and season calendars were used to understand the physical and social orientation of the village in general 

and watershed in specific. These tools put the villagers in ease that the complicated questionnaires. Various tools like Matrix Ranking, Venn diagram were used to 

identify various local vegetations (apt for afforestation), Fodders crops, various institutions and their significance in the life of the farmers. 

(V) Use of GIS and Remote Sensing for Planning 

Use of various high scientific tools has been promoted at various stages of watershed development. 

(a) Prioritization 

Geographical Information System (GIS) has been used for prioritization process. Various layer maps were created like Geo-morphological, Soil, BPL population, 

SC/ST population, Ground water status, Drinking water facility, Slope percent. These were all given proper Weightage according to the DoLR specification. This 

helped in prioritization of various watershed areas. 

(b) Planning 

A action plan matrix was formulated by State Level Nodal Agency (SLNA) taking in to account various features like slope percent, soil depth, soil texture, soil erosion 

in the area for waste land, forest land and agriculture land. Global Positioning System (GPS) was used to identify each and every water conservation structures 

available in the project area. This was used to create a map. Contour map of vertical interval of 1 meter at a scale of 1:8000 was used for identifying various 

locations for soil and water conservation structures. 

(c) Hydrological modeling 

Hydrology modeling technique was used for locating drainage, stream length, flow direction, sink, and flow accumulation. This model overlaid over cadastral map to 

calculate the catchment area of each structures like check dam, etc. This has helped to remove the human error which generally occurs while calculating the 

catchment area of a check dam. 



Table no. 30: Details of Scientific Planning and Inputs in IWMP projects 

S. No. Scientific criteria/ inputs used Whether scientific criteria was used 

(A) Planning 

Cluster approach 

Yes 

Whether technical back-stopping for the project has been arranged? If yes, mention the name of the Institute - 

Baseline survey 

Yes 

Hydro-geological survey 

Yes 

Contour mapping 

Yes 

Participatory Net Planning (PNP) 

Yes 

Remote sensing data-especially soil/ crop/ run-off cover Yes 

Ridge to Valley treatment 

Yes 

Online IT connectivity between 

(1) Project and DWDU cell/ZP Yes 

(2) DWDU and SLNA Yes 

(3) SLNA and DoLR Yes 

Availability of GIS layers 

1. Cadastral map Yes 

2. Village boundaries Yes 

3. Drainage Yes 

4. Soil (Soil nutrient status) Yes 

5. Land use Yes 

6. Ground water status Yes 

7. Watershed boundaries Yes 

8. Activity Yes 

Crop simulation models # 

Integrated coupled analyzer/ near infrared visible spectroscopy/ medium spectroscopy for high speed soil 

nutrient analysis 

Normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI)# 

Weather Station 

Yes 

(B) Inputs 

1. Bio-pesticides Yes 

2. Organic manures Yes 

3. Vermicompost Yes 

4. Bio-fertilizer Yes 

5. Water saving devices Yes 


6. Mechanized tools/ implements Yes 

7. Bio-fencing Yes 

8. Nutrient budgeting Yes 

9. Automatic water level recorders & sediment samplers Yes 

Any other (please specify) 

#NDVI - Ratio of the differences of the response of vegetation in the near infrared & red regions of the electromagnetic spectrum 


PRA Photo 



Detail Project Report IWMP 7


Table no.31: Details of PRA Activities conducted in the project area 

Name of the PRA 

Sr. No. 

Date 

Activity / FGD 

Lessons learnt / Understanding of the problem/situation 

1 Social Mapping 

2 Resource Mapping 

3 Transect Walk 

4 

Focused Group 

Discussion 

10/08/2011 

to 

22/11/2011 


ST Population (Damor, Bariya, Khanta, Rot, Vaghadiya, Khant, Sangada, Taviyad, Bodat, Pargi, 

Harijan, Chamar, Dindor, Pateliya) 

Scatterd Popluation. 

Main Festevals:- Diwali,Holi 

High Expenditure on Social Occasions 

Poor Litreacy Rate 

Village Insititution: Gram Panchayat, Dairy Co Operative, Temple etc 

Main Source of Income: Agriculture & Animal Husbendury 

Drinking Water Sources: Open wells (For 10 th Month Period) & Hand Pump 

Rain Fed Agriculture 

Average Land Holding-1 Acre 

Observation 

Irrigatation Source 

Open Well/Bore Well 

Area Under Rabi Session: 54:25 Ha (Main Crop wheat, Red Gram, Mung, Castor, Vegetables) 

Ground Water Table: 8 mt Below 

Oil Engine use for Irrigation Facilities 

Agriculture 

‣ Major Crops : Maize, Paddy, Tur, Wheat etc. 

‣ Lack of Knowledge of Improved Agriculture Practices 

‣ Use of local Varity of seed Reduced the crop Prodction 

‣ Low Prices of Crop Due to Lack of Market Linkage 

‣ Un known about Modern Technology 

‣ Soil Depth Average 20 to 40 cm & 5 to 20% slope 

‣ Local Animal Breed 

Poor Fertility of Soil & Crop Production 

Improved Seed & Production 

Less Vegetables Farming 

Improvement of Cattle Breed & Milk Production 

Women Demand for more Employment in Project Village


5 Seasonal Mapping 

6 Soil Mapping 

Women Interested in SHG 

Main Source of employment are Agriculture, AH and Farm Labour 

Crop grown in only two Season (Monsoon & Ravi Season) 

Village Women Working in Agriculture, AH & Home Wife 

40 to 60 % Rockey Shadow Soil 

10 to 15 % Red & Brown (Goradu) Soil 

15 to 20 % Soil Mix with Stonee soil 

20 to 40 % Flate to Modarate Slope for Forest Area 

0 to 45 % Flate to Modarate Slope 

Soil Erasion from Farm Land, & Forest Land 

Low Vegetative Cover 



Problem Tree 



Object tree analysis 


4.2 Institution Building (I) Watershed Committee (WC) 



The Gram Sabha will constitute the Watershed Committee (WC) to implement the Watershed project with the technical support of the WDT in the village. The 

Watershed Committee (WC) has to be registered under the Society Registration Act, 1860. The Gram Sabha may elect/appoint any suitable person from the village 

as the Chairman of Watershed Committee. The secretary of the Watershed Committee (WC) will be a paid functionary of the Watershed Committee (WC). The 

Watershed Committee (WC) will comprise of at least 10 members, half of the members shall be representatives of SHGs and User Groups, SC/ST community, women 

and landless persons in the village. One member of the WDT shall also be represented in the Watershed Committee (WC). Where the Panchayat covers more than 

one village, they would constitute a separate subcommittee for each village to manage the watershed development project in the concerned village. Where a 

watershed project covers more than one Gram Panchayat, separate committees will be constituted for each Gram Panchayat. The Watershed Committee (WC) 

would be provided with an independent rented office accommodation with Internet connected computer for IT link up. 

The watershed committee has a pivotal role to play during and after the project implementation period. 

Table no. 32.1: Ghaswada Watershed Committee details 

Date of 

Registration 

Sl. Names of 

as a Society 

No. WCs 

(dd/mm/ 

yyyy) 

Designation M/F Age SC ST SF MF LF 

Vagadiya 

1 Vechatbhai 

Lalabhai 

Khant 

2 Kantibhai 

Hathibhai 

Khant 

3 Ratnabhai 

Chufrabhai 

Khant 

4 Manilal 

Rupabhai 

Khant 

5 Babubhai 

Lembabhai 

6 

Khant 

Rameshbhai 

UG SHG GP 

Any 

other 

Landless 

Educational 

qualification 

Function/s 

assigned# 

President M 36 1 1 - - - - - 1 - B.A. B 

Secretary M 38 1 1 - - - - - - - 12 Pass C 

Member M 40 1 1 - - - - - - - 10 Pass E 

Member M 34 1 1 - - - - - - - 12 Pass I 

Member M 33 1 1 - - - - - - - - B 

Member M 30 1 1 - - - - - - - 10 Pass D

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

Pratapbhai 

Khata 

Mashabhai 

Dhulabhai 

Damor 

Balvantbhai 

Laxmanbhai 

Pargi 

Narmadaben 

Nanabhai 

Damor 

Savitaben 

Kanabhai 

Vagadiya 

Rajuben 

Khemabhai 

Vagadiya 

Ranchodbhai 

Khatrabhai 


Member M 35 1 1 - - - - - - - - E 

Member M 37 1 1 - - - - - - - 8 Pass H 

Member F 28 1 1 - - - - - - - 6 Pass J 

Member F 29 1 1 - - - - - - - 10 Pass F 

Member F 26 1 1 - - - - - - - 9 Pass C 

Member M 38 1 1 - - - - - - - 5 Pass J 

Table no. 32.2: Tarkoninal Watershed Committee details 


Registration 


as a Society 

No. WCs 

(dd/mm/ 

yyyy) 


UG SHG GP 

Dama 

1 Lalabhai 

President M 48 1 1 - - - - - - - 5 Pass B 

Shalubhai 

Patelliya 

2 Motibhai 


Somabhai 

Amliyar 

3 Lalabhai 

Member M 40 1 1 - - - - - - - 5 Pass E 

Ditabhai 

Taviyad 

4 Laxmanbhai 

Member M 34 1 1 - - - - - - - 12 Pass I 

Lalabhai 

5 Dama Member M 33 1 1 - - - - - - - 4 Pass B 


Any 

other 

Landless 

Educational 

qualification 

Function/s 

assigned#

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

Danabhai 

Valabhai 

Vagadiya 

Laxmanbhai 

Nathabhai 

Taviyad 

Raysingbhai 

Somabhai 

Khant 

Dhuliben 

Fulabhai 

Dama 

Savitaben 

Parvatbhai 

Raval 

Shardaben 

Ashokbhai 

Pateliya 

Bhemabhai 

Motibhai 

Pateliya 

Abesingbhai 

Akhmabhai 

Pateliya 

Fulabhai 

Pujabhai 


Member M 30 1 1 - - - - - - - 10 Pass D 

Member M 35 1 1 - - - - - - - 

Member F 37 1 1 - - - - - - - 3 Pass H 

Member F 28 1 1 - - - - - - - 7 Pass J 

Member F 29 1 1 - - - - - - - 7 Pass F 

Member M 26 1 1 - - - - - - - 10 Pass C 

Member M 35 1 1 - - - - - - - 10 Pass C 

Member M 40 1 1 - - - - - - - 7 Pass J 

10 

pass 

E 

Table no. 32.3: Nanirath Watershed Committee details 


Registration 


as a Society 

No. WCs 

(dd/mm/ 

yyyy) 


Bhamaniya 

1 Javarabhai 

Pujabhai 

Bhamaniya 

2 Maganbhai 

Surmabhai 


UG SHG GP 

Any 

other 

Landless 

Educational 

qualification 

Function/s 

assigned# 

President M 48 1 1 - - - - - - 1 10 Pass B 

Secretary M 38 1 1 - - - - - - - 12 Pass C

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

Taviyad 

Fatiben 

Somabhai 

Bhamaniya 

Udabhai 

Somabhai 

Taviyad 

Magalabhai 

Lalabhai 

Damor 

Parvatbhai 

Somabhai 

Taviyad 

Kalubhai 

Akhamabhai 

Dholi Valiben 

Akhmabhai 

Taviyad 

Sartanbhai 

Koyabhai 

Raval Kaliben 

Masabhai 

Taviyad 

Kalubhai 

Ujmabhai 

Bhamaniya 

Nathabhai 

Rumalbhai 


Member F 40 1 1 - - - - - - - 3 Pass E 

Member M 34 1 1 - - - - - - - 12 Pass I 

Member M 33 1 1 - - - - - - - 7 Pass B 

Member M 30 1 1 - - - - - - - 10 Pass D 

Member M 35 1 1 - - - - - - - 7 Pass E 

Member F 37 1 1 - - - - - - - 2 Pass H 

Member M 28 1 1 - - - - - - - 6 Pass J 

Member F 29 1 1 - - - - - - - 10 Pass F 

Member M 28 1 1 - - - - - - - 10 Pass G 

Member M 26 1 1 - - - - - - - 9 Pass C 

Table no. 32.4: Motirath Watershed Committee details 


Registration 


as a Society 

No. WCs 

(dd/mm/ 

yyyy) 


UG SHG GP 

Taviyad 

1 Lalabhai 


Parvatbhai 

2 Taviyad Secretary M 38 1 1 - - - - - - - 12 Pass C 


Any 

other 

Landless 

Educational 

qualification 

Function/s 

assigned#

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

Rajeshbhai 

Parvatbhai 

Taviyad 

Nareshbhai 

Laxmanshin 

Taviyad 

Premilaben 

Koyabhai 

Taviyad 

Nathabhai 

Bharubhai 

Taviyad 

Savabhai 

Goutmabhai 

Khant 

Bhuriben 

Shanabhai 

Taviyad 

Ashwinbhai 

Lalabhai 

Taviyad 

Navalben 

Udabhai 

Taviyad 

Punamben 

Jeshingbhai 

Chhamar 

Lalabhai 

Vechatbhai 


Member M 40 1 1 - - - - - - - 10 Pass E 

Member M 34 1 1 - - - - - - - 12 Pass I 

Member M 33 1 1 - - - - - - - - B 

Member M 30 1 1 - - - - - - - 10 Pass D 

Member M 35 1 1 - - - - - - - - E 

Member M 37 1 1 - - - - - - - 8 Pass H 

Member F 28 1 1 - - - - - - - 6 Pass J 

Member F 29 1 1 - - - - - - - 10 Pass F 

Member F 28 1 1 - - - - - - - 10 Pass G 

Table no. 32.5: Sarasva (N) Watershed Committee details 


Educational 

Function/s 

Registration 


Landless 

other qualifi- 

assigned# 

Any 

as a Society Designation M/F Age SC ST SF MF LF 

UG SHG GP 

No. WCs 

(dd/mm/ 

cation 

yyyy) 

1 

Roat Fatabhai 

Manabhai 


2 Sangada Secretary M 38 1 1 - - - - - - - 12 Pass C 


3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

Ghamirshin 

Dhulabhai 

Damor 

Ramabhai 

Bhurabhai 

Roat Hirabhai 

Bhurabhai 

Bodat 

Saburbhai 

Mangubhai 

Khant 

Somabhai 

Mashabhai 

Sangada 

Laxmanbhai 

Koyabhai 

Khata 

Savitaben 

Dhirabhai 

Harijan 

Jeshiben 

Somabhai 

Roat Revaben 

Bhagabhai 

Vagadiya 

Vikashbhai 

Dhulabhai 

Roat 

Ramanbhai 

Bhurabhai 

Vagadiya 

Zalabhai 

Bapubhai 

Vagadiya 

Vindobhai 

Somabhai 


Member M 40 1 1 - - - - - - - 10 Pass E 

Member M 34 1 1 - - - - - - - 12 Pass I 

Member M 33 1 1 - - - - - - - - B 

Member M 30 1 1 - - - - - - - 10 Pass D 

Member M 35 1 1 - - - - - - - - E 

Member M 37 1 1 - - - - - - - 8 Pass H 

Member F 28 1 1 - - - - - - - 6 Pass J 

Member F 29 1 1 - - - - - - - 10 Pass F 

Member F 28 1 1 - - - - - - - 10 Pass G 

Member F 26 1 1 - - - - - - - 9 Pass C 

Member M 51 1 1 - - - - - 1 - 10 Pass C 

Member M 29 1 1 - - - - - - - 10 Pass C 


Table no. 32.6: Ditvas Watershed Committee details 


Registration 


as a Society 

No. WCs 

(dd/mm/ 

yyyy) 


Damor 

1 Jeshingbhai 

Somabhai 

Damor 

2 Kalubhai 

Hirabhai 

Damor 

3 Surmabhai 

Bhurabhai 

Damor 

4 Laxmanbhai 

Kankabhai 

Vagadiya 

5 Mashurabhai 

Galabhai 

Damor 

6 Nanabhai 

Ranchodbhai 

Taral 

7 Magalabhai 

Nathabhai 

Damor 

8 Hantiben 

Ramabhai 

Harijan 

9 Mathubhai 

Saburbhai 

Damor 

10 Kashiben 

Jesingbhai 

Labana 

11 Indrasinh 

Manilal 


UG SHG GP 


Any 

other 

Landless 

Educational 

qualification 

Function/s 

assigned# 



Member M 40 1 1 - - - - - - - 10 Pass E 

Member M 34 1 1 - - - - - - - 12 Pass I 

Member M 33 1 1 - - - - - - - - B 

Member M 30 1 1 - - - - - - - 10 Pass D 

Member M 35 1 1 - - - - - - - - E 

Member M 37 1 1 - - - - - - - 8 Pass H 

Member F 28 1 1 - - - - - - - 6 Pass J 

Member F 29 1 1 - - - - - - - 10 Pass F 

Member F 28 1 1 - - - - - - - 10 Pass G

12 

Pagi 

Natvarbhai 

Kalubhai 


Member F 26 1 1 - - - - - - - 9 Pass C 

Table no. 32.7: Bhul Watershed Committee details 


Registration 


as a Society 

No. WCs 

(dd/mm/ 

yyyy) 


Dindor 

1 Bharatbhai 

Akhamabhai 

Dindor 

2 Popatbhai 

Nathabhai 

Dindor 

3 Navabhai 

Akhamabhai 

Dindor 

4 Somabhai 

Navabhai 

Dindor 

5 Hirabhai 

Chufrabhai 

Dindor 

6 Bharatbhai 

Bhurabhai 

Dindor 

7 Dalpatbhai 

Bhurabhai 

Dindor 

8 Keshiben 

Arjanbhai 

9 

Baria Lilaben 

Bharatbhai 

Baria 

10 Hathibhai 

Bhemabhai 


UG SHG GP 

Any 

other 

Landless 

Educational 

qualification 

Function/s 

assigned# 



Member M 40 1 1 - - - - - - - 10 Pass E 

Member M 34 1 1 - - - - - - - 12 Pass I 

Member M 33 1 1 - - - - - - - - B 

Member M 30 1 1 - - - - - - - 10 Pass D 

Member M 35 1 1 - - - - - - - - E 

Member M 37 1 1 - - - - - - - 8 Pass H 

Member F 28 1 1 - - - - - - - 6 Pass J 

Member F 29 1 1 - - - - - - - 10 Pass F

11 

12 

Dindor 

Ranchodbhai 

Pujabhai 

Taviyad 

Bharatbhai 

Ujmabhai 


Member F 28 1 1 - - - - - - - 10 Pass G 

Member F 26 1 1 - - - - - - - 9 Pass C 

Table no. 32.8: Sarasdi Watershed Committee details 


Registration 


as a Society 

No. WCs 

(dd/mm/ 

yyyy) 


Valu 

1 Arjanbhai 

Somabhai 

Pateliya 

2 Gemabhai 

Bhurabhai 

Pateliya 

3 

Arjanbhai 

Rupabhai 

Lembabhai 

Dindor 

4 Jethabhai 

Motibhai 

Valu 

5 Jitmalbhai 

Akhmabhai 

Pateliya 

6 Rupabhai 

Dhulabhai 

7 

Valu Jeshiben 

Maheshbhai 

Vagadiya 

8 Abeshingbhai 

Lalabhai 

9 

Taviyad 

Rajiben 


UG SHG GP 

Any 

other 

Landless 

Educational 

qualification 

Function/s 

assigned# 


Secretary M 58 1 1 - - - - - 1 - 10 Pass C 

Member M 40 1 1 - - - - - - - 10 Pass E 

Member M 34 1 1 - - - - - - - 12 Pass I 

Member M 33 1 1 - - - - - - - - B 

Member M 30 1 1 - - - - - - - 10 Pass D 

Member M 35 1 1 - - - - - - - - E 

Member M 37 1 1 - - - - - - - 8 Pass H 

Member F 28 1 1 - - - - - - - 6 Pass J

10 

11 

12 

Ujmabhai 

Pagi 

Kanabhai 

Lalabhai 

Damor 

Laxmanbhai 

Rupabhai 

Damor 

Jesingbhai 

Sanabhai 


Member M 29 1 1 - - - - - - - 10 Pass F 

Member M 28 1 1 - - - - - - - 10 Pass G 

Member M 35 1 1 - - - - - - - 10 Pass C 

Table no. 32.9: Rankpur Watershed Committee details 


Registration 


as a Society 

No. WCs 

(dd/mm/ 

yyyy) 


UG SHG GP 

Damor 

1 Amrabhai 


Dalabhai 

Damor 

2 Bhemabhai 


Manabhai 

Damor 

3 Sakalabhai 

Member M 40 1 1 - - - - - - - 10 Pass E 

Koyabhai 

Damor 

4 Jeshingbhai 

Member M 34 1 1 - - - - - - - 12 Pass I 

Kalubhai 

Damor 

5 Udabhai 

Member M 33 1 1 - - - - - - - - B 

Laxmanbhai 

Damor 

6 Dilipbhai 

Member M 30 1 1 - - - - - - - 10 Pass D 

Pratapbhai 

Damor 

7 Parvatbhai 

Member M 35 1 1 - - - - - - - - E 

Galabhai 

8 Damor Member M 37 1 1 - - - - - - - 8 Pass H 


Any 

other 

Landless 

Educational 

qualification 

Function/s 

assigned#

9 

10 

11 

12 

Sakaliben 

Chhatrabhai 

Parmar 

Manguben 

Dhanjibhai 

Damor 

Jashiben 

Partapbhai 

Damor 

Shukhabhai 

Fulabhai 

Damor 

Laxmanbhai 

Hirabhai 


Member F 28 1 1 - - - - - - - 6 Pass J 

Member F 29 1 1 - - - - - - - 10 Pass F 

Member F 28 1 1 - - - - - - - 10 Pass G 

Member F 26 1 1 - - - - - - - 9 Pass C 

# Only the letter assigned, as below, needs to be typed, except for `J’, where the type may be specifically mentioned. 

A. PNP and PRA B. Planning 

C. Maintenance of Accounts D. Signing of cheques and making payments 

E. Supervision of construction activities F. Cost Estimation 

G. Verification & Measurement H. Record of labour employed 

I. Social Audit J. Any other (please specify). 

ii) Self Help Group 

Self Help Groups are motivated, small homogenous groups organized together through credit and thrift activities. Self help group initiative especially for women 

help uplift their livelihood. Generally self help groups include landless and poor women. 

Before formation of the SHGs, during PRA activities, Focused Group Discussions (FGDs) were held with the women, which came up with the following observations: 

a) Lack of proper credit facilities due to low intervention of formal financial credit institution. 

b) Excessive exploitation of weaker section by money lenders 

c) Lack of attitude for saving among poor people 

d) Lack of knowledge on credit and thrift activity and banking. 


Table no. 33: SHG detail 

S. No. 


village 

With 

only 

Men 

Total no. of registered SHGs 

With only 

Women 


With 

both 

No. of members 

No. of SC/ST in each 

category 


No. of BPL in each 

category 

Total Categories M F Total M F Total M F Total 

1 Sarasva 3 3 0 6 

(i) Landless 

(ii) SF 8 10 18 8 10 18 20 20 40 

(iii) MF 20 10 30 20 10 30 6 8 14 

(iv) LF 5 3 8 5 3 8 

Total 3 3 0 6 33 23 56 33 23 56 26 26 52 

2 Ditvas 3 3 0 6 

(i) Landless 

(iv) LF 

(ii) SF 30 29 59 30 29 59 28 30 58 

(iii) MF 3 4 7 3 4 7 3 1 4 

Total 3 3 0 6 33 33 66 33 33 66 31 31 62 

3 Karvai 2 2 0 4 

(i) Landless 

(ii) SF 5 6 11 6 5 11 7 6 11 

(iii) MF 11 13 24 11 13 24 11 13 24 

(iv) LF 4 5 9 4 5 9 4 5 9 

Total 2 2 0 4 20 24 44 21 23 44 22 24 44 

4 Motirath 1 1 0 2 

(i) Landless 

(ii) SF 8 8 16 8 8 16 5 6 11 

(iii) MF 3 3 6 3 3 6 0 0 0 

(iv) LF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

Total 1 1 0 2 11 11 22 11 11 22 5 6 11 

5 Nanirath 0 3 0 3 

(i) Landless 

(ii) SF 26 26 26 26 26 26 

(iii) MF 7 7 7 7 7 7 

(iv) LF 0 0 0 0 0 0 

Total 0 3 3 3 33 33 33 33 33 33 

6 Bhul 1 1 0 2 

(i) Landless 

(ii) SF 9 8 17 9 8 17 9 8 17 

(iii) MF 2 3 5 2 3 5 0 0 0 

(iv) LF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

Total 1 1 0 2 11 11 22 11 11 22 9 8 17 

7 Nanapadadra 1 1 0 2 

(i) Landless 

(ii) SF 11 11 22 11 11 22 10 06 16



(iii) MF 

(iv) LF 

Total 1 1 0 2 11 11 22 11 11 22 10 06 16 

8 Tarkoninal 2 1 0 3 

(i) Landless 

(iv) LF 

(ii) SF 22 11 33 22 11 33 22 11 33 

(iii) MF 

Total 2 1 0 3 22 11 33 22 11 33 22 11 33 

9 Amboja 1 1 0 2 

(i) Landless 

(ii) SF 

(iii) MF 10 9 19 10 9 19 10 4 14 

(iv) LF 1 2 3 1 2 3 0 0 0 

Total 1 1 0 2 11 11 22 11 11 22 10 4 14 

10 Karodia (n) 1 1 0 2 

(i) Landless 

(iv) LF 

(ii) SF 

(iii) MF 11 11 22 11 11 22 9 10 19 

Total 1 1 0 2 11 11 22 11 11 22 9 10 19 

11 Sarasdi 2 2 0 4 

(i) Landless 

(ii) SF 18 20 38 17 19 36 20 20 40 

(iii) MF 4 4 6 5 3 8 0 0 0 

(iv) LF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

Total 2 2 0 4 22 24 44 22 22 44 20 20 40 

12 Rakakot 1 2 0 3 

(i) Landless 

(ii) SF 

(iii) MF 8 19 27 8 19 27 9 17 26 

(iv) LF 3 3 6 3 3 6 0 0 0 

Total 1 2 0 3 11 22 33 11 22 33 9 17 26 

13 Jambunala 2 1 0 3 

(i) Landless 

(iv) LF 

(ii) SF 

(iii) MF 22 11 33 22 11 33 20 9 29 

Total 2 1 0 3 22 11 33 22 11 33 20 9 29 

14 Pacher 1 1 0 2 

(i) Landless 

(iv) LF 

(ii) SF 12 12 24 12 12 24 11 10 21 

(iii) MF 

Total 1 1 0 2 12 12 24 12 12 24 11 10 21


15 Ghaswada 2 2 0 4 

(i) Landless 

(ii) SF 20 20 40 20 20 40 15 10 25 

(iii) MF 2 2 4 2 2 4 2 1 3 

(iv) LF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

Total 2 2 0 4 22 22 44 22 22 44 17 11 28 

(i) Landless 

16 

(ii) SF 

0 3 0 3 

Rankpur 

(iii) MF 24 24 24 24 24 24 

(iv) LF 9 9 9 9 9 9 

Total 0 3 0 3 33 33 33 33 33 33 

iii) User Group: 

User Groups are normally formed to manage an activity or asset created under the programme on a long term basis. The user group collects user charges from their 

members, oversee the works and manage the benefits. 

It was decided that each group would formulate certain internal rules and have a feeling of ownership with community spirit. 

Table no. 34: UG detail 

S. No. 


village 

With only 

Men 

Total no. of registered SHGs 

With only 

Women 


With 

both 

No. of members 

No. of SC/ST in 

each category 

No. of BPL in each 

category 

Total Categories M F Total M F Total M F Total 

(i) Landless 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

(ii) SF 80 13 93 80 13 93 11 3 14 

1 Sarasva 15 3 0 18 

(iii) MF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

(iv) LF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

Total 15 3 0 18 80 13 93 80 13 93 11 3 14 

(i) Landless 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

(ii) SF 99 10 109 99 10 109 7 2 9 

2 Ditvas 12 2 0 14 

(iii) MF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

(iv) LF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

Total 12 2 0 14 99 10 109 99 10 109 7 2 9 

3 Karvai 10 1 0 11 

(i) Landless 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

(ii) SF 40 4 44 40 4 44 5 4 9



(iii) MF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

(iv) LF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

Total 10 1 0 11 40 4 44 40 4 44 5 4 9 

(i) Landless 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

4 Motirath 12 1 0 13 

(ii) SF 58 7 65 58 7 65 6 2 8 

(iii) MF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

(iv) LF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

Total 12 1 0 13 58 7 65 58 7 65 6 2 8 

(i) Landless 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

5 Nanirath 4 1 0 5 

(ii) SF 30 5 35 30 5 35 4 1 5 

(iii) MF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

(iv) LF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

Total 4 1 0 5 30 5 35 30 5 35 4 1 5 

(i) Landless 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

6 Bhul 2 1 0 3 

(ii) SF 12 3 15 12 3 15 2 3 5 

(iii) MF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

(iv) LF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

Total 2 1 0 3 12 3 15 12 3 15 2 3 5 

(i) Landless 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

7 

Nanapadad 

(ii) SF 10 3 13 10 3 13 2 1 3 

2 1 0 3 

ra 

(iii) MF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

(iv) LF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

Total 2 1 0 3 10 3 13 10 3 13 2 1 3 

(i) Landless 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

Tarkorni 

(ii) SF 30 3 33 30 3 33 11 3 14 

8 

4 1 0 5 

nad 

(iii) MF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

(iv) LF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

Total 4 1 0 5 30 3 33 30 3 33 11 3 14 

(i) Landless 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

(ii) SF 27 3 30 27 3 30 10 2 12 

9 Amboja 4 1 0 5 

(iii) MF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

(iv) LF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

Total 4 1 0 5 27 3 30 27 3 30 10 2 12 

10 

Karodiya 

(N) 

4 1 0 5 

(i) Landless 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

(ii) SF 17 5 22 17 5 22 6 3 9


(iii) MF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

(iv) LF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

Total 4 1 0 5 17 5 22 17 5 22 6 3 9 

(i) Landless 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

11 Sarsadi 5 1 0 6 

(ii) SF 22 5 27 22 5 27 10 3 13 

(iii) MF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

(iv) LF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

Total 5 1 0 6 22 5 27 22 5 27 10 3 13 

(i) Landless 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

12 Rakakot 2 1 0 3 

(ii) SF 8 3 11 8 3 11 3 2 5 

(iii) MF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

(iv) LF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

Total 2 1 0 3 8 3 11 8 3 11 3 2 5 

(i) Landless 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

13 Jambunada 4 1 0 5 

(ii) SF 21 5 26 21 5 26 5 3 8 

(iii) MF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

(iv) LF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

Total 4 1 0 5 21 5 26 21 5 26 5 3 8 

(i) Landless 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

14 Pachher 4 1 0 5 

(ii) SF 30 5 35 30 5 35 6 7 13 

(iii) MF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

(iv) LF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

Total 4 1 0 5 30 5 35 30 5 0 0 7 13 

(i) Landless 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

15 Ghaswada 12 1 0 13 

(ii) SF 58 7 65 58 7 65 15 4 19 

(iii) MF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

(iv) LF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

Total 12 1 0 13 58 7 65 58 7 65 15 4 19 

(i) Landless 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

16 Ranakpur 10 1 0 11 

(ii) SF 120 8 128 120 8 128 15 5 20 

(iii) MF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

(iv) LF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

Total 10 1 0 11 120 8 128 120 8 128 15 5 20 



4.3 Physical activities to be undertaken under IWMP 7 

4.3.1 Entry point activities (EPA) 

EPA activities are taken up under watershed projects to build a rapport with the village community at the beginning of the project; generally, certain important 

works which are in urgent demand of the local community are taken up. A group Discussion was conducted with watershed Development Committee regarding the 

EPA activity, it was conveyed to the WC that an amount of Rs. 29.91 Lacks was allotted for EPA activity; which was 4 per cent of total allocated budget. The villagers 

discussed various activities which they felt is important but after a brief discussion it was conveyed to them that only those activities can be taken, which revive the 

common natural resources. It was also taken into priority that there should be an instrument of convergence which will result in sustainability of activities. 

Table no.35: Entry point activities (EPA) (All financial figures in Lacks Rs.) 

S. No. Names of Villages 

Amount earmarked 

Estimated 

Entry Point Activities planned 

for EPA 

cost 

Expected outcome 

Washing ghat 1.164 Approach space for Village pond 

Check wall repairing 0.756 Soil and Water conservation 

1 Sarasva (N) 4.66 

Stone pitching 0.892 Soil and Water conservation 


Check dam Repairing 0.612 Soil and Water conservation 

2 Ditvas 3.84 

Waste weir Repairing 1.841 Soil and Water conservation 

Causeway Repairing 1.999 Connecting Village road 

3 Karvai 2.44 Check dam Repairing 2.441 Soil and Water conservation 

4 Motirath 1.84 

Causeway 1.051 Connecting Village road 


5 Nanirath 1.90 Check dam Repairing 1.900 Soil and Water conservation 

6 Bhul 0.81 Washing ghat 0.814 Approach space for Village pond 

7 Nana Padadara 0.63 Check dam Repairing 0.629 Soil and Water conservation 

8 Tarkoninal 1.25 Check dam Repairing 1.247 Soil and Water conservation 

9 Ambuja 1.88 Causeway with Earthen Work 1.879 Connecting Village road 

10 Karodiya (N) 1.19 Check dam Repairing 1.185 Soil and Water conservation 

11 Sarasdi 2.50 

Causeway Repairing 1.994 Connecting Village road 

Water Tank and Havada 0.501 Drinking Water facilities for animals 

12 Rakakot 0.73 Pond Earthen work and Stone Pitching 0.732 Soil and Water conservation 

13 Jambunala 1.15 Check wall 1.149 Soil and Water conservation 

14 Pacher 1.23 Causeway Repairing 1.233 Connecting Village road 

15 Ghasvada 1.94 Causeway 1.030 Connecting Village road 




16 Rankpur 1.94 


Check wall 0.899 Soil and Water conservation 

Total 29.92 29.913 

4.3.2 Watershed Development work 

Watershed development works are to be done during second phase of watershed project. A multi-tier ridge to valley sequence approach should be approached 

towards implementation of watershed development projects. A net budget of 56 percent is allocated for this work. 

Table no.36: Details of ridge line treatment / land based activities in watershed works* 

Type of treatment Type of land Target 

S. 


(ii) 

(i) 

(iii) 

Unit 

No Village name 

(iii) 

structures 

(i) Ridge Draina 

Private 

Community (pl. 

cu.m./ 

(ii) Others 

(No./ 

. 

Land 

No. 

area (R) ge line 

dev. (L) 

(D) 

(P) 

specify) 

rmt) 

1 Sarasva 

2 Ditvas 


Estimated cost (Rs. in 

lakh) 

M W O T 

Expected 

month & year 

of completion 

(mm/yyyy) 

Staggered 

trenching 

Boulder check R C Forest 50 nos 1.05 April. - 2014 

Pond 

Deepening 

L C 2 nos 4.00 April. - 2015 

Stone bunding R P 815 RMT 2.65 April. - 2015 

Earthen 

bunding 

L C 2 nos 1.30 April. - 2014 

Gully plug R C 50 Nos 7.50 April. - 2014 

Gabion 

structures 

D C 8 nos 4.80 April. - 2014 

Field bunds L P 8010 RMT 3.68 April. - 2015 

Any others (pl. 

specify) 

Total 24.98 

Staggered 

trenching 


Stone bunding R P Forest 625 RMT 2.03 April. - 2015



Earthen 

bunding 

L C 4 nos 2.60 April. - 2014 


Gabion 

structures 

D C 6 nos 3.60 April. - 2014 



specify) 

Total 18.92 

Staggered 

trenching 

R Forest 600 RMT 0.33 April. - 2014 


Stone bunding R P Forest 620 RMT 2.01 April. - 2015 

Earthen 

L C 2 nos 1.30 April. - 2014 

bunding 

3 Karvai 


Gabion 

structures 

D C 2 nos 1.20 April. - 2014 



specify) 

Total 15.91 

Staggered 

trenching 



Earthen 

L C 4 nos 2.40 April. - 2014 

bunding 

4 Motirath 


Gabion 

structures 

D C 2 nos 1.20 April. - 2014 



specify) 

Total 14.34 

5 Nanirath 

Staggered 

trenching





Earthen 

bunding 

L C 2 nos 1.20 April. - 2014 


Gabion 

structures 

D C 2 nos 1.20 April. - 2014 



specify) 

Total 14.83 

Staggered 

trenching 



Earthen 

L C 1 nos 0.60 April. - 2014 

bunding 

6 Bhul 


Gabion 

structures 

D C 0 nos 0.00 April. - 2014 



specify) 

Total 5.09 

Staggered 

trenching 

Boulder check R C Forest 0 nos 


Earthen 

L C 0.00 

Nanapadadr bunding 

7 

a 


Gabion 

structures 

D C 0 nos 0.00 April. - 2014 



specify) 

Total 3.94



Staggered 

trenching 



Earthen 

L C 0.00 

bunding 

8 Tarkoninal 


Gabion 

structures 

D C 0 nos 0.00 April. - 2014 



specify) 

Total 7.86 

Staggered 

trenching 



Earthen 

L C 2 nos 1.30 April. - 2014 

bunding 

9 Amboja 


Gabion 

structures 

D C 1 nos 0.60 April. - 2014 



specify) 

Total 14.70 

Staggered 

trenching 


Pond 

Deepening 

L C 1 nos 2.00 April. - 2015 

10 Karodiya Stone bunding R P 180 RMT 0.59 April. - 2015 

Earthen 

bunding 

L C 1 nos 0.60 April. - 2014 


Gabion 

structures 

D C 0 nos 0.00 April. - 2014





specify) 

Total 8.85 

Staggered 

trenching 



Earthen 

L C 1 nos 0.60 April. - 2014 

bunding 

11 Sarasdi 


Gabion 

structures 

D C 1 nos 0.60 April. - 2014 



specify) 

Total 19.55 

Staggered 

trenching 

R Forest 1210 RMT 0.66 April. - 2014 



Earthen 

L C 0.00 

bunding 

12 Rakakot 


Gabion 

structures 

D C 0 nos 0.00 April. - 2014 



specify) 

Total 6.14 

Staggered 

trenching 


13 Jambunala Stone bunding R P 200 RMT 0.65 April. - 2015 

Earthen 

bunding 

L C 1 nos 0.60 April. - 2014 

Gully plug R C 30 Nos 4.50 April. - 2014



Gabion 

structures 

D C 0 nos 0.00 April. - 2014 



specify) 

Total 10.35 

Staggered 

trenching 



Earthen 

L C 0.00 

bunding 

14 Pacher 


Gabion 

structures 

D C 1 nos 0.60 April. - 2014 



specify) 

Total 9.50 

Staggered 

trenching 



Earthen 

L C 0.00 

bunding 

15 Ghasvada 


Gabion 

structures 

D C 0 nos 0.00 April. - 2014 



specify) 

Total 14.81 

16 Rankpur 

Staggered 

trenching 



Earthen L C 1 nos 0.60 April. - 2014



bunding 


Gabion 

structures 

0 nos 0.00 April. - 2014 



specify) 

Total 14.56 

Grand Total 204.33 

(M – Materials, W- wages, O- others, T – Total) 

Table no.37: Activities related to Surface water resources in the project areas (all financial figures in Lacks Rs.) 

Proposed target 

S. No. Village name 

Type of 

structures 

No. 

Augmentation/ repair of existing 

structures 

Area to 

be 

irrigated 

(ha) 

Storage 

capacity 

Estimated 

cost 

No. 

Construction of new structures 

Area to 

be 

irrigated 

(ha) 

Storage 

capacity 

Estimated 

cost 

Area to 

be 

irrigated 

(ha) 

Total target 

Storage 

capacity 

Estimated 

cost 

Waste weir 0 0 0 0 1 1.30 1.30 

Nala plug 0 0 0 0 15 9.00 9.00 

1 Sarasva 

Check wall 0 0 0 0 15 18.00 18.00 

Check dam 0 0 0 0 6 18.00 18.00 

Protection wall 0 0 0 0 7 9.80 9.80 

Pond Deepening 0 0 0 0 2 4.00 4.00 

Total 0 0 0 0 46 0 0 60.10 0 0 60.10 

Nala plug 0 0 0 0 13 7.80 7.80 

2 Ditvas 

Check wall 0 0 0 0 13 15.60 15.60 

Check dam 0 0 0 0 5 15.00 15.00 


Total 0 0 0 0 34 0 0 42.60 0 0 42.60 

3 Karvai 

Nala plug 0 0 0 0 11 6.30 6.30 

Check wall 0 0 0 0 9 10.80 10.80


Check dam 0 0 0 0 2 6.00 6.00 


Total 0 0 0 0 24 0 0 25.90 0 0 25.90 

Nala plug 0 0 0 0 5 3.00 3.00 

4 Motirath 

Check wall 0 0 0 0 6 7.20 7.20 

Check dam 0 0 0 0 2 6.00 6.00 


Total 0 0 0 0 17 0 0 21.80 0 0 21.80 

Nala plug 0 0 0 0 7 4.20 4.20 

5 Nanirath 

Check wall 0 0 0 0 6 7.20 7.20 

Check dam 0 0 0 0 1 3.00 3.00 


Total 0 0 0 0 18 0 0 20.00 0 0 20.00 

Nala plug 0 0 0 0 4 2.40 2.40 

6 Bhul 

Check wall 0 0 0 0 2 2.40 2.40 

Check dam 0 0 0 0 1 3.00 3.00 


Total 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 10.60 0 0 10.60 

Nala plug 0 0 0 0 2 1.20 1.20 

7 NanaPadadra Check wall 0 0 0 0 2 2.40 2.40 

Check dam 0 0 0 0 1 3.00 3.00 

Total 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 6.60 0 0 6.60 

Nala plug 0 0 0 0 5 3.00 3.00 

8 Tarkoninal 

Check wall 0 0 0 0 4 4.80 4.80 

Check dam 0 0 0 0 1 3.00 3.00 


Total 0 0 0 0 12 0 0 13.60 0 0 13.60 

Nala plug 0 0 0 0 7 4.20 4.20 

9 Ambuja 

Check wall 0 0 0 0 6 7.20 7.20 

Check dam 0 0 0 0 1 3.00 3.00 


Total 0 0 0 0 17 0 0 18.60 0 0 18.60 

10 Karodiya (N) Nala plug 0 0 0 0 4 2.40 2.40 



Check wall 0 0 0 0 3 3.60 3.60 

Check dam 0 0 0 0 1 3.00 3.00 


Total 0 0 0 0 11 0 0 13.20 0 0 13.20 

Nala plug 0 0 0 0 8 4.80 4.80 

11 Sarasdi 

Check wall 0 0 0 0 7 8.40 8.40 

Check dam 1 1.6 1 3.00 4.60 


Total 0 0 0 0 18 0 0 19.00 0 0 20.60 

Nala plug 0 0 0 0 4 2.40 2.40 

12 Rakakot 

Check dam 0 0 0 0 2 2.40 2.40 

Check dam 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 


Total 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 7.60 0 0 7.60 

Nala plug 0 0 0 0 4 2.40 2.40 

13 Jambunala Check dam 1 0 0 1.2 1 3.00 4.20 


Total 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 6.80 0 0 8.00 

Nala plug 0 0 0 0 6 3.60 3.60 

14 Pacher 

Check wall 0 0 0 0 2 2.40 2.40 

Check dam 0 0 0 0 1 3.00 3.00 


Total 0 0 0 0 11 0 0 11.80 0 0 11.80 

Nala plug 0 0 0 0 10 6.00 6.00 

15 Ghasvada 

Check wall 0 0 0 0 5 6.00 6.00 

Check dam 0 0 0 0 1 3.00 3.00 


Total 0 0 0 0 18 0 0 17.80 0 0 17.80 

Nala plug 0 0 0 0 8 4.80 4.80 

16 Rankpur 

Check wall 0 0 0 0 6 7.20 7.20 

Check dam 0 0 0 0 1 3.00 3.00 


Total 0 0 0 0 18 0 0 19.20 0 0 19.20 




Grand total 2 2.80 272 315.20 318.00 

Table no.38: Activities related to recharging ground water resources in the project areas (all financial figures in Lacks Rs.) 

Proposed target 

Augmentation/ repair of existing Construction of new recharging 

recharging structures 

structures 

S. No. Name of Villages Type of structures 

Area to be 

Area to be 

Estimated 

Estimated 

No. irrigated 

No. irrigated 

cost 

cost 

(ha) 

(ha) 

1 Sarasva 

2 Ditvas 

3 Karvai 

4 Motirath 

5 Nanirath 

6 Bhul 

7 Nanapadadra 

8 Tarkoninal 

Area to be 

irrigated 

(ha) 

Total target 

Estimated 

cost 

Open wells 3 0.90 7 9.80 10.70 

Bore wells 1 0.60 0 0.00 0.60 

Total for the village 4 0 1.50 7 0 9.80 0 11.30 

Open wells 3 0.90 7 9.80 10.70 

Bore wells 1 0.60 0 0.00 0.60 


Open wells 2 0.60 5 7.00 7.60 

Bore wells 1 0.60 0 0.00 0.60 


Open wells 3 0.60 5 7.00 7.60 

Bore wells 1 0.60 0 0.00 0.60 


Open wells 2 0.60 5 7.00 7.60 

Bore wells 1 0.60 0 0.00 0.60 


Open wells 2 0.60 3 4.20 4.80 

Bore wells 1 0.60 0 0.00 0.60 


Open wells 2 0.60 3 4.20 4.80 

Bore wells 1 0.60 0 0.00 0.60 


Open wells 2 0.60 3 4.20 4.80 

Bore wells 1 0.60 0 0.00 0.60 

Total for the village 3 0 1.20 3 0 4.20 0 5.40


9 Ambuja 

10 Karodiya (N) 

11 Sarasdi 

12 Rakakot 

13 Jambunala 

14 Pacher 

15 Ghasvada 

16 Rankpur 

Open wells 1 0.25 3 4.20 4.45 

Bore wells 1 0.60 0 0.00 0.60 


Open wells 2 0.60 3 4.20 4.80 

Bore wells 1 0.60 0 0.00 0.60 


Open wells 2 0.60 5 7.00 7.60 

Bore wells 1 0.60 0 0.00 0.60 


Open wells 2 0.60 3 4.20 4.80 

Bore wells 1 0.60 0 0.00 0.60 


Open wells 2 0.60 3 4.20 4.80 

Bore wells 1 0.60 0 0.00 0.60 


Open wells 2 0.60 3 4.20 4.80 

Bore wells 1 0.60 0 0.00 0.60 


Open wells 2 0.60 5 7.00 7.60 

Bore wells 1 0.60 0 0.00 0.60 


Open wells 2 0.60 5 7.00 7.60 

Bore wells 1 0.60 0 0.00 0.60 


Total for the Project 50 0 19.45 68 0 95.20 0 114.65 

Table no.39: Details of activities related to livelihood, production system and micro-enterprises 

S. 

No. 


village 

Name of activity 

Quantity 

No/ha/unit 

(i) 

Private 

Type of land 

(ii) 

Community 

(iii) 

Others 

(pl. 

specify) 

Executing 

agency 

(i) UG (ii)SHG 

(iii) Others 

(pl. specify) 

Estimated 

cost 

(Rs. in 

Lacks) 

Target 

Expected 

month & year 

of completion 

(mm/yyyy) 



1 Sarasva (N) 

Crop Demonstration 

Maize, Red Gram, Tur, Paddy, Wheat, Bean 

(Val) 

6 nos P UG 0.30 

Cotton, Castor 2 no P UG 0.16 

Turmeric, Ginger, Garlic etc 3 nos P UG 0.45 

Vegetable Demonstration 

Chilly, Brinjal, Tomato, Lady Finger, Guar, 

Cauliflower, Cabbage etc 

7 nos P UG 0.35 

Climber type Vegetable 7 nos P UG 1.47 

Promotion of Agricultural Activities 

Vegetable Nursery (Green House) and 

Promotion of Vegetable Seeding 

Sprayer Pump to UG (in Nursery) 

Horticulture Plantation 30 nos P UG 4.50 

Floriculture 

Better Quality (Improved Variety) Seed Store 

Organic Farming 0.00 

Vermi Compost to Individual 10 nos P UG 1.00 

Vermi Compost to SHG 

Agro-Processing Unit 

Flour & Rice Processing Unit 2 C SHG 2.00 

Dal/Rice Processing Unit 

Dairy Product making 

Herbal Collection Centre and Processing Unit 

Spice making Unit 

Oil Extraction Unit 

Leather Work 1 C SHG 1.50 

Bamboo Work 3 C SHG 1.50 

Zero Energy Cold Storage 2 P UG 0.30 

Maize threshing Unit 

Agricultural allied activity 

Poultry farming to individual 50 nos P UG 1.50 

Poultry farming to SHG 1 Unit C SHG 1.00 


2 Ditvas 

Fishery 0.00 

Forestry Nursery 

Dairy Development 0.00 

Cattle camp & Vaccination Camp, Artificial 

Insemination etc 

10 nos C UG 1.00 

Goat Rearing 1 nos C SHG 1.00 

Milk Production 

Promotion of Fodder, green as well as dry 80 nos P UG 0.80 

Cattle Feed Store 1 nos p SHG 1.00 

Minor Activities 

Up Gradation Centering Materails 

Paper Dish Making 

Oil Engine 2 C UG 0.50 



(Val) 

5 no P UG 0.30 



Vegetable Demonstration 0.00 



7 nos P UG 0.35 


Promotion of Agricultural Activities 0.00 



1 unit C UG 0.50 

Sprayer Pump to UG (in Nursery) 2 unit C UG 0.10 

Horticulture Plantation 25 unit C UG 3.75 

Floriculture 




Vermi Compost to SHG 16.88 






3 Karvai 




Spice making Unit 1 C SHG 1.00 


Leather Work 1 C SHG 1.50 

Bamboo Work 1 C SHG 0.50 

Zero Energy Cold Storage 

Maize threshing Unit 2 C UG 0.15 


Poultry farming to individual 40 nos UG 0.80 

Poultry farming to SHG 

Fishery 0.00 





10 nos C 1.00 



Promotion of Fodder, green as well as dry 42 no P UG 0.42 

Cattle Feed Store 1 C SHG 2.00 



Oil Engine 2 C UG 0.50 

Paper Dish Making 1 C SHG 0.50 



(Val) 

5 no P UG 0.25 






7 nos P UG 0.35 








Floriculture 



Vermi Compost to Individual 8 nos C UG 0.80 









Leather Work 

Bamboo Work 

Zero Energy Cold Storage 1 C UG 0.15 

Maize threshing Unit 2 C SHG 0.15 


Poultry farming to individual 20 nos P UG 0.40 


Fishery 0.00 





8 nos C UG 0.80 







4 Motirath 

Cattle Feed Store 1 P UG 1.00 



Oil Engine 1 P SHG 0.50 




(Val) 

5 no P UG 0.25 

Cotton, Castor 





4 nos P UG 0.20 






Horticulture Plantation 

Floriculture 




Vermi Compost to SHG 








Leather Work 1 P SHG 1.00 

Bamboo Work 


5 Nanirath 


Maize threshing Unit 2 P SHG 1.50 




Fishery 1 Unit C SHG 1.00 





5 nos C UG 0.50 




Cattle Feed Store 



Oil Engine 1 P UG 0.50 

Paper Dish Making 1 P SHG 0.50 



(Val) 

5 no P UG 0.25 






4 nos P UG 0.20 







Floriculture 





6 Bhul 





Flour & Rice Processing Unit 1 P SHG 1.00 






Leather Work 

Bamboo Work 











8 nos C UG 0.80 




Cattle Feed Store 1 nos C SHG 1.00 







(Val) 

4 no P UG 0.20 



Turmeric, Ginger, Garlic etc 




2 nos P UG 0.10 






Horticulture Plantation 5 unit P UG 0.75 

Floriculture 












Leather Work 

Bamboo Work 











7 Nanapadadara 



4 nos C UG 0.40 

Goat Rearing 


Promotion of Fodder, green as well as dry 







(Val) 

3 no P UG 0.15 






2 nos P UG 0.10 

Climber type Vegetable 1 no P UG 0.10 






Floriculture 













8 Tarkoninal 


Leather Work 

Bamboo Work 




Poultry farming to individual 


Fishery 





2 nos C UG 0.20 

Goat Rearing 



Cattle Feed Store 1 nos P UG 1.00 






(Val) 

4 no P UG 0.20 






5 nos P UG 0.25 

Climber type Vegetable 3 nos P 0.63 








9 Ambuja 

Floriculture 






Flour & Rice Processing Unit 1 nos C SHG 1.00 






Leather Work 

Bamboo Work 


Maize threshing Unit 2 P UG 0.15 




Fishery 1 C SHG 0.50 





3 nos C UG 0.30 

Goat Rearing 



Cattle Feed Store 1 C SHG 1.00 





Maize, Red Gram, Tur, Paddy, Wheat, Bean 5 no P UG 0.25 



(Val) 






5 nos P UG 0.25 







Floriculture 






Flour & Rice Processing Unit 1 nos C SHG 1.25 






Leather Work 

Bamboo Work 


Maize threshing Unit 2 p UG 0.15 




Fishery 0.00 




10 Karodiya 




8 nos C UG 0.80 




Cattle Feed Store 1 P SHG 1.00 






(Val) 

4 no P UG 0.20 






5 nos P UG 0.25 







Floriculture 






Flour & Rice Processing Unit 






11 Sarasdi 



Leather Work 

Bamboo Work 






Fishery 0.00 





4 nos C UG 0.40 



Promotion of Fodder, green as well as dry 10 P UG 0.10 







(Val) 

5 no P UG 0.25 






5 nos P UG 0.25 









Floriculture 










Spice making Unit 1 C SHG 1.00 


Leather Work 

Bamboo Work 






Fishery 0.00 





8 nos C UG 0.80 












12 Rakakot 



(Val) 

4 no P UG 0.20 






5 nos P UG 0.25 







Floriculture 






Flour & Rice Processing Unit 1 P SHG 0.75 






Leather Work 

Bamboo Work 







13 Jambunala 

Fishery 0.00 





3 nos C UG 0.30 

Goat Rearing 









(Val) 

4 no P UG 0.20 






5 nos P UG 0.25 







Floriculture 











14 Pachher 





Leather Work 

Bamboo Work 






Fishery 0.00 





6 nos C UG 0.60 










(Val) 

4 no P UG 0.20 






5 nos P UG 0.25 

Climber type Vegetable 2 no P UG 0.42 






Horticulture Plantation 6 unit C SHG 0.90 

Floriculture 






Flour & Rice Processing Unit 






Leather Work 

Bamboo Work 






Fishery 0.00 





6 nos C UG 0.60 









15 Ghaswada 

Up Gradation Centering Materails 1 P SHG 0.85 





(Val) 

5 no P UG 0.25 






5 nos P UG 0.25 







Floriculture 










Spice making Unit 1 C UG 0.50 


Leather Work 

Bamboo Work 


Maize threshing Unit 2 P UH 0.15 


16 Rankpur 




Fishery 0.00 





10 nos C UG 1.00 











(Val) 

5 no P UG 0.25 






5 nos P UG 0.25 







Floriculture 












Spice making Unit 1 C UG 0.50 


Leather Work 

Bamboo Work 


Maize threshing Unit 2 P UH 0.15 




Fishery 0.00 





10 nos C UG 1.00 











Table no. 40: Activities related to livelihoods by Self Help Groups (SHGs) in the project areas 


Major activities of the SHGs 

S. No. 

Villages 

Name of activity No. of SHGs involved Average annual income from activity per SHG 

Flour and dal processing unit 1 0.50 

1 Sarasva (N) 

Spice Making Unit 1 0.60


2 Ditvas 

3 Karvai 

4 Motirath 

5 Nanirath 

6 Bhul 

7 Nana Padadara 

8 Tarkoninal 

9 Ambuja 


Leather Work 1 0.25 

Bamboo Work 3 0.25 

Poultry Farming to SHG 1 0.10 

Goat Rearing 1 0.25 

Cattle Feed Store 1 1.20 

Paper dish making unit 1 0.40 


Spice Making Unit 1 0.75 

Leather Work 1 0.25 

Bamboo Work 1 0.20 




Poultry Farming To SHG 1 0.10 







Paper Dish Making 1 0.25 

Lether work 1 0.50 


Fishery 1 0.50 













Goat rearing 1 1.10 

Cattle Feed Store 1 0.15



11 Sarasdi 

12 Rakakot 

13 Jambunala 

14 Pacher 

15 Ghasvada 

16 Rankpur 





















Goar Rearing 1 0.15 


Spice Making 1 0.30 




Table no. 41: Linkages developed at village level 

Sr. No. Village Name of activity Forward/Backward linkage Linkage with Outcome 

Flour and dal processing unit Backward Village level 0.50 

Spice Making Unit Forward Santrampur City 0.60 

Leather Work Backward Village level 0.25 

1 Sarasva (N) 

Bamboo Work Forward/Backward Santrampur City 0.25 

Poultry Farming to SHG Forward Santrampur City 0.10 

Goat Rearing Forward/Backward Santrampur City/Village Level 0.25 

Cattle Feed Store Backward Village level 1.20 

Paper dish making unit Backward Village level 0.40 

2 Ditvas Flour and dal processing unit Backward Village level 0.50 


3 Karvai 

4 Motirath 

5 Nanirath 

6 Bhul 


8 Tarkoninal 

9 Ambuja 


11 Sarasdi 



Spice Making Unit Forward/Backward Santrampur City/Village Level 0.75 

Leather Work Forward/Backward Santrampur City/Village Level 0.25 

Bamboo Work Forward/Backward Santrampur City/Village Level 0.20 


Paper dish making unit Forward/Backward Santrampur City/Village Level 0.25 


Poultry Farming To SHG Forward/Backward Santrampur City/Village Level 0.10 


Goat Rearing Backward Village level 0.20 


Flour and dal processing unit Forward/Backward Santrampur City/Village Level 0.60 



Paper Dish Making Forward/Backward Santrampur City/Village Level 0.25 

Leather Work Backward Village level 0.50 


Fishery Backward Village level 0.50 


Cattle Feed Store Forward/Backward Santrampur City/Village Level 0.60 


Fishery Forward/Backward Santrampur City/Village Level 0.85 






Fishery Forward/Backward Santrampur City/Village Level 0.75 


Poultry Farming To SHG Backward Village level 0.50 

Goat rearing Forward/Backward Santrampur City/Village Level 1.10 




Paper Dish Making Backward Village level 0.50 

Poultry Farming to SHG Backward Village level 0.50 


Spice Making Unit Backward Village level 0.50 

Goat rearing Forward/Backward Santrampur City/Village Level 1.20


12 Rakakot 

13 Jambunala 

14 Pacher 

15 Ghasvada 

16 Rankpur 








Goat rearing Forward/Backward Santrampur City/Village Level 1.10 

Flour and dal processing unit Forward/Backward Santrampur City/Village Level 0.25 


Spice Making Unit Backward Village level 0.30 

Poultry Farming to SHG Forward/Backward Santrampur City/Village Level 0.40 


Goar Rearing Forward/Backward Santrampur City/Village Level 0.15 


Spice Making Backward Village level 0.30 

Poultry Farming to SHG Backward Village level 0.50 

Paper Dish Making Backward Village level 0.40 


Table no.42: Details of activities connected with vegetative cover in watershed works 

S. No. Name of village 


structure/ work 

(i) 

Ridge 

area 

(R) 

Type of treatment 

(ii) 

Drainage 

line 

(D) 

(iii) 

Land 

dev. 

(L) 

(i) 

Private 

Type of land 

(ii) 

Community 

(iii) 

Others 

(pl. 

specify) 

Executing 

agency 

(i) UG 

(ii)SHG 

(iii) Others 

(pl. 

specify) 

Afforestation 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

Regeneration 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

Agro-forestry 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

1 Sarasva (N) 

Fuel wood 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

Fodder 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

Horticulture 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

Pasture dev. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

Nursery raising 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 


Area 

(ha) 

No. of 

plants 

Target 

Estimated 

cost 

(Rs. in 

Lacks) 

Expected 

month & 

year of 

completion 

(mm/ yyyy)

2 Ditvas 

3 Karvai 

4 

Motirath 

5 Nanirath 



Others (pl. 

specify) 

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 


Regeneration 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

Agro-forestry 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

Fuel wood 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

Fodder 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

Horticulture 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

Pasture dev. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 


Others (pl. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

specify) 


Regeneration 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

Agro-forestry 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

Fuel wood 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

Fodder 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

Horticulture 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

Pasture dev. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 


Others (pl. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

specify) 


Regeneration 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

Agro-forestry 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

Fuel wood 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

Fodder 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

Horticulture 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

Pasture dev. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 


Others (pl. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

specify) 


Regeneration 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

Agro-forestry 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

Fuel wood 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

Fodder 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

Horticulture 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

6 

Bhul 

7 Nanapadadara 

8 

Tarkoninal 

9 Ambuja 



Pasture dev. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 


Others (pl. 

specify) 

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 


Regeneration 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

Agro-forestry 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

Fuel wood 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

Fodder 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

Horticulture 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

Pasture dev. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 


Others (pl. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

specify) 


Regeneration 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

Agro-forestry 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

Fuel wood 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

Fodder 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

Horticulture 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

Pasture dev. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 


Others (pl. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

specify) 


Regeneration 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

Agro-forestry 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

Fuel wood 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

Fodder 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

Horticulture 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

Pasture dev. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 


Others (pl. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

specify) 


Regeneration 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

Agro-forestry 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

Fuel wood 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0


11 Sarasdi 

12 Rakakot 

13 Jambunala 



Fodder 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

Horticulture 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

Pasture dev. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 


Others (pl. 

specify) 

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 


Regeneration 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

Agro-forestry 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

Fuel wood 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

Fodder 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

Horticulture 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

Pasture dev. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 


Others (pl. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

specify) 


Regeneration 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

Agro-forestry 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

Fuel wood 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

Fodder 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

Horticulture 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

Pasture dev. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 


Others (pl. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

specify) 


Regeneration 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

Agro-forestry 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

Fuel wood 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

Fodder 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

Horticulture 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

Pasture dev. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 


Others (pl. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

specify) 


Regeneration 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

14 Pacher 

15 Ghasvada 

16 Rankpur 



Agro-forestry 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

Fuel wood 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

Fodder 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

Horticulture 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

Pasture dev. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 


Others (pl. 

specify) 

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 


Regeneration 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

Agro-forestry 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

Fuel wood 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

Fodder 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

Horticulture 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

Pasture dev. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 


Others (pl. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

specify) 


Regeneration 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

Agro-forestry 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

Fuel wood 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

Fodder 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

Horticulture 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

Pasture dev. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 


Others (pl. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

specify) 


Regeneration 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

Agro-forestry 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

Fuel wood 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

Fodder 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

Horticulture 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

Pasture dev. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 


Others (pl. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

specify)


Table no.43: Details of activities in the CPRs in the project areas 

Target 

S. No. 

Name(s) of the 

villages 

CPR particulars 

Activity proposed 

Target area under the activity 

(ha) 

Estimated expenditure (Rs.) 

Expected no. of 

beneficiaries 

Total for project 

Total for village 

0 0 0 0 0 

Table no. 44: Capacity Building Institution: 

S. No. 

Name of the 

Training 

Institute 

Full Address with 

contact no., website 

& e-mail 

Type of 

Institute# 

Area(s) of 

specialization$ 

1 N M Sadguru Dahod NGO Watershed 

2 BISAG Gandhinagar Autonomous GIS 

3 CSWCRTI Vasad 

Research Soil and water 

Institutes Conservation 

Accredita-tion 

details 

Reference Year 

Trainings 

No. of trainings 

assigned 

No. of trainees 

to be trained 

# Central govt. Dept./ State govt. Dept./ Autonomous Body/ Research Institutes/ Universities/ Others (pl. specify) 

$ Capacity Building/ Agriculture/ Horticulture/ Animal Husbandry/ Pisciculture/ Remote Sensing/ Water conservation/ Ground water/ Forestry/ livelihoods/ 

entrepreneurship development/ others (pl. specify) 

Table no. 45: Capacity Building plan: 

S. No. 

Project 

Total no. of No. of persons to be 

Project Stakeholders 

name 

persons 

trained 

No. of training programmes Estimated cost 

PIA 2 2 3 0.20 

WDTs 5 5 5 0.50 

UGs 80 80 5 0.60 


SHGs 100 100 5 0.75 

WCs 55 55 3 0.40 

GPs 0 0 0 0 

Community 50 50 3 0.30 



Others 

(Pl. specify) 

0 0 0 0 

292 292 24 2.75 

Table no.46: Information, Education and Communication Activities: 

S. No. Activity Executing agency Estimated expenditure (Rs.) 

1 

2 

Banners, Hoardings 

Wall Painting at 3 community 

Place 

DWDU Panchmahal 

0.35 

0.50 

3 Pamphlets and Posters 0.10 

4 Street Play (Bhavai) 0.20 

Outcome 

(may quantify, wherever possible) 

Awareness for the importance of 

watershed project 



Chapter 5 

BUDGET 



Table no. 47: Budget at a glance for the project 

Sl no Budget component Cost requirement 

1 Administrative costs (10 %) 74.79 

2 Monitoring & Evalution (2 %) 14.92 

3 Entry Point activity (4 %) 29.93 

4 Institution and Capacity Building (5 %) 37.40 

5 Detailed Project Report (1 %) 7.46 

6 Watershed Development Works (56 % ) 418.85 

7 Livelihood activities for asset less (9 % ) 67.31 

8 Production systems and micro-enterprises (10 % ) 74.79 

9 Consolidation phase (3 %) 22.44 

Total 747.89 

Table no. 48: Village wise- component wise budget available under IWMP 

Activity 

Sl 

Village 

Watershed development Livelihood for Production system 

no 

EPA Institution and CB DPR 

Consolidation Total 

Work 

asset less and Microenterprises 

1 Sarasva (N) 4.66 5.82 1.16 65.22 10.48 11.65 3.49 116.46 

2 Ditvas 3.84 4.80 0.96 53.77 8.64 9.60 2.88 96.01 

3 Karvai 2.44 3.05 0.61 34.17 5.49 6.10 1.83 61.01 

4 Moti Rath 1.84 2.30 0.46 25.73 4.13 4.59 1.38 45.94 

5 Nani Rath 1.30 1.62 0.32 18.14 2.92 3.24 0.97 32.40 

6 Bhul 0.81 1.02 0.20 11.39 1.83 2.03 0.61 20.35 

7 Nana Padadara 0.63 0.79 0.16 8.80 1.41 1.57 0.47 15.72 

8 Tarkoni Nal 1.25 1.56 0.31 17.45 2.80 3.12 0.93 31.17 

9 Amboja 1.88 2.35 0.47 26.31 4.23 4.70 1.41 46.99 

10 Karodia (North) 1.19 1.48 0.30 16.59 2.67 2.96 0.89 29.63 

11 Sarsdi 2.50 3.12 0.62 34.95 5.62 6.24 1.87 62.41 

12 Rankakot 0.73 0.92 0.18 10.25 1.65 1.83 0.55 18.31 

13 Jambunala 1.15 1.44 0.29 16.09 2.59 2.87 0.86 28.73 

14 Pachher 1.23 1.54 0.31 17.26 2.77 3.08 0.92 30.83 

15 Ghaswada 1.94 2.42 0.48 27.11 4.36 4.84 1.45 48.41 

16 Ranakpur 1.94 2.42 0.48 27.14 4.36 4.85 1.45 48.47 

Total 29.31 36.64 7.33 410.38 65.95 73.28 21.98 732.83 



Table no. 49: Village wise gap in funds requirement 

Sl No Village Total cost requirement Total funds available under IWMP Gap in funds requirement 

1 Sarasva (N) 82.02 65.218 16.802 

2 Ditvas 67.07 53.766 13.304 

3 Karvai 43.90 34.167 9.733 

4 Motirath 39.67 25.727 13.943 

5 Nanirath 36.26 26.599 9.661 

6 Bhul 16.90 11.395 5.505 

7 Nana Padadara 15.74 8.801 6.939 

8 Tarkoninal 25.69 17.453 8.237 

9 Ambuja 33.86 26.312 7.548 

10 Karodiya (N) 22.32 16.594 5.726 

11 Sarasdi 40.23 34.948 5.282 

12 Rakakot 18.74 10.253 8.487 

13 Jambunala 26.58 16.090 10.49 

14 Pacher 34.87 17.265 17.605 

15 Ghasvada 46.08 27.108 18.972 

16 Rankpur 35.60 27.142 8.458 

Total 585.53 418.838 166.692 

Table no.50: Details of Convergence of IWMP with other Schemes 

S. No. Village name Phase/ Type of work* 


Activity to be carried 

out 

Fund made 

available to IWMP 

due to convergence 

(Rs. in Lacks) 

Scheme with 

which 

convergence 

took place 

Reference no. of 

activity/ task/ 

structure in DPR 

Level at which 

decision for 

convergence was 

taken 

1 Sarasva (N) Work Phase/ SMC Protection wall 9.80 MGNREGA Table no 37 Village Level 

2 Sarasva (N) Work Phase/ SMC Check wall 6.00 MGNREGA Table no 37 Village Level 

3 Sarasva (N) Work Phase/ SMC Open well 9.80 MGNREGA Table no 38 Village Level 

4 Ditvas Work Phase/ SMC Contour trench 1.05 Forest Table no 36 Village Level 

5 Ditvas Work Phase/ SMC Checkwall 3.60 MGNREGA Table no 37 Village Level 

6 Ditvas Work Phase/ SMC Protection wall 4.20 MGNREGA Table no 37 Village Level 

7 Ditvas Work Phase/ SMC Open well 9.80 MGNREGA Table no 38 Village Level 

8 Karvai Work Phase/ SMC Checkwall 4.80 MGNREGA Table no 37 Village Level 

9 Karvai Work Phase/ SMC Protection wall 4.20 MGNREGA Table no 37 Village Level 

10 Karvai Work Phase/ SMC Open well 7.00 MGNREGA Table no 38 Village Level


11 Motirath Work Phase/ SMC Protection wall 5.60 MGNREGA Table no 37 Village Level 

12 Motirath Work Phase/ SMC Check wall 4.80 MGNREGA Table no 37 Village Level 

13 Motirath Work Phase/ SMC Nala Plug 2.20 MGNREGA Table no 37 Village Level 

14 Motirath Work Phase/ SMC Open well 7.00 MGNREGA Table no 38 Village Level 

15 Nanirath Work Phase/ SMC Protection wall 5.60 MGNREGA Table no 37 Village Level 

16 Nanirath Work Phase/ SMC Check wall 2.40 MGNREGA Table no 37 Village Level 

17 Nanirath Work Phase/ SMC Open well 7.00 MGNREGA Table no 38 Village Level 

18 Bhul Work Phase/ SMC Checkwall 1.20 MGNREGA Table no 37 Village Level 

19 Bhul Work Phase/ SMC Protection wall 2.80 MGNREGA Table no 37 Village Level 

20 Bhul Work Phase/ SMC Open well 4.20 MGNREGA Table no 38 Village Level 

21 Nana Padadara Work Phase/ SMC Checkwall 1.20 MGNREGA Table no 37 Village Level 

22 Nana Padadara Work Phase/ SMC Protection wall 2.80 MGNREGA Table no 37 Village Level 

23 Nana Padadara Work Phase/ SMC Open well 4.20 MGNREGA Table no 38 Village Level 

24 Tarkoninal Work Phase/ SMC Checkwall 1.20 MGNREGA Table no 37 Village Level 

25 Tarkoninal Work Phase/ SMC Protection wall 2.80 MGNREGA Table no 37 Village Level 

26 Tarkoninal Work Phase/ SMC Open well 4.80 MGNREGA Table no 38 Village Level 

27 Ambuja Work Phase/ SMC Boulder check 0.71 Forest Table no 36 Village Level 

28 Ambuja Work Phase/ SMC Protection wall 4.20 MGNREGA Table no 37 Village Level 

29 Ambuja Work Phase/ SMC Open well 4.20 MGNREGA Table no 38 Village Level 

30 Karodiya (N) Work Phase/ SMC Boulder check 0.49 Forest Table no 36 Village Level 

31 Karodiya (N) Work Phase/ SMC Checkwall 1.20 MGNREGA Table no 37 Village Level 

32 Karodiya (N) Work Phase/ SMC Protection wall 2.80 MGNREGA Table no 37 Village Level 

33 Karodiya (N) Work Phase/ SMC Open well 4.20 MGNREGA Table no 38 Village Level 

34 Sarasdi Work Phase/ SMC Checkwall 2.40 MGNREGA Table no 37 Village Level 

35 Sarasdi Work Phase/ SMC Protection wall 2.80 MGNREGA Table no 37 Village Level 

36 Sarasdi Work Phase/ SMC Open well 7.00 MGNREGA Table no 38 Village Level 

37 Rakakot Work Phase/ SMC Protection wall 1.40 MGNREGA Table no 37 Village Level 

38 Rakakot Work Phase/ SMC Open well 4.20 MGNREGA Table no 38 Village Level 

39 Jambunala Work Phase/ SMC Boulder check 1.05 Forest Table no 36 Village Level 

40 Jambunala Work Phase/ SMC Protection wall 1.40 MGNREGA Table no 37 Village Level 

41 Jambunala Work Phase/ SMC Open well 4.20 MGNREGA Table no 38 Village Level 

42 Pacher Work Phase/ SMC Protection wall 2.80 MGNREGA Table no 37 Village Level 

43 Pacher Work Phase/ SMC Open well 4.20 MGNREGA Table no 38 Village Level 



44 Ghasvada Work Phase/ SMC Checkwall 2.40 MGNREGA Table no 37 Village Level 

45 Ghasvada Work Phase/ SMC Protection wall 2.80 MGNREGA Table no 37 Village Level 

46 Ghasvada Work Phase/ SMC Open well 7.00 MGNREGA Table no 38 Village Level 

47 Rankpur Work Phase/ SMC Checkwall 2.40 MGNREGA Table no 36 Village Level 

48 Rankpur Work Phase/ SMC Protection wall 4.20 MGNREGA Table no 37 Village Level 

49 Rankpur Work Phase/ SMC Open well 7.00 MGNREGA Table no 38 Village Level 

195.10 

*Phase/Type of work: EPA, Land base, Surface water, Ground water, Livelihood 

Table no. 51: Public-Private Partnership in the IWMP projects 

Name of Private 

Type of agreement signed 

S. No. Sector Partner 

c) Any other 

a)MoU b)Contract 

Agency 

(pl. specify) 

Financial contribution 

IWMP 

Private sector 

Partnership 

Interventions 

Expected 

Outcomes 

1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

Comments 



Chapter 6 

OUTCOMES 



6.1 Expected Outcomes 

This project is a need based project which aims to increase the individual income, to generate self employment and to increase the agricultural productivity in the 

sixteen project villages of Kadana block under the IWMP. This project will be focused on multi approach activities which create an employment opportunity in their 

native villages for sustaining their income and check the migration, which became a key to defeat the present problems. Project will not only focus on create 

employment opportunity but also it focus on the sustainable use of natural resources by using latest appropriate technology and strengthening the local leaders 

through capacity building and training, which ultimately ensure the sustainable livelihood of the people of the project Village. The detail expected outcome are 

detailed below. 

Table no.52: Environmental Benefits 

Sr. 

No. 

Village 


Soil loss (cmt) Water storage (Cmt) Ground water table (mt) Tree cover 

Preproject 

Expected 

postproject 

Preproject 

Expected 

postproject 

Open 

well: 

preproject 

Open 

well: 

postproject 

Bore 

well: 

preproject 

Bore 

well: 

postproject 

Area in 

Ha.: preproject 

Area in 

Ha.: postproject 

1 Sarasva (N) 

0 50000 8.0 7.50 60 58 0.00 0.00 NA NA 

2 Ditvas 0 60000 8.0 7.50 60 58 429.63 446.82 NA NA 

3 Karvai 0 40000 7.5 7.00 55 53 138.20 143.73 NA NA 

4 Motirath 0 60000 8.5 8.00 75 73 291.65 303.31 NA NA 

5 Nanirath 0 45000 10.0 9.50 75 73 131.65 136.92 NA NA 

6 Bhul 0 40000 10.0 9.50 75 73 51.67 53.73 NA NA 

7 Nana Padadara 0 55000 9.0 8.50 65 63 37.18 38.66 NA NA 

8 Tarkoninal 0 35000 6.0 5.50 75 73 134.44 139.82 NA NA 

5 to 10 2 to 4 

9 Ambuja 0 45000 7.5 7.00 55 53 158.08 164.40 NA NA 

10 Karodiya (N) 0 30000 7.5 7.00 60 58 148.16 154.08 NA NA 

11 Sarasdi 0 55000 8.5 8.00 65 63 264.64 275.22 NA NA 

12 Rakakot 0 35000 10.0 9.50 75 73 67.21 69.90 NA NA 

13 Jambunala 0 65000 10.0 9.50 75 73 121.60 126.47 NA NA 

14 Pacher 0 60000 10.5 10.00 80 77 125.40 130.42 NA NA 

15 Ghasvada 0 45000 7.5 7.00 55 53 154.75 160.94 NA NA 

16 Rankpur 0 35000 8.5 8.00 60 58 170.00 176.80 NA NA 

Tree 

count: 

preproject 

Tree 

count: 

postproject


6.1.1: Drinking water 

The villages in the project area totally depend upon hand pump and well for drinking and other domestic activities but the availability of water is only 10 months at 

maximum. The activities of watershed and the linkage with the WASMO will increase the ground water table so that the expected status of drinking water will 

increase. Comparative status of drinking water between pre-project and expected post project are furnished as under. 

Table no. 53: Status of Drinking water 

S. No. Names of Villages 

Availability of drinking water (no. of months in a year) 

Quality of drinking water 

Pre-project Expected Post project Pre-project Expected Post-project 

Comments 

1 Sarasva (N) 8 to 10 12 Brackish Potable - 

2 Ditvas 8 to 10 12 Brackish Potable - 

3 Karvai 8 to 10 12 Brackish Potable - 

4 Motirath 8 to 9 12 Brackish Potable - 

5 Nanirath 8 to 10 12 Brackish Potable - 

6 Bhul 8 to 9 12 Brackish Potable - 

7 Nana Padadara 8 to 9 12 Brackish Potable - 

8 Tarkoninal 7 to 8 12 Brackish Potable - 

9 Ambuja 8 to 10 12 Brackish Potable - 

10 Karodiya (N) 8 to 10 12 Brackish Potable - 

11 Sarasdi 8 to 10 12 Brackish Potable - 

12 Rakakot 7 to 8 12 Brackish Potable - 

13 Jambunala 8 to 10 12 Brackish Potable - 

14 Pacher 8 to 10 12 Brackish Potable - 

15 Ghasvada 8 to 10 12 Brackish Potable - 

16 Rankpur 8 to 10 12 Brackish Potable - 

6.1.2: Expected Crops Yield. 

Due to additional availability of water farmers of the project area will be able to crops in their available land during winter seasons. Even after taking rainy season 

and post-rainy season crops into consideration, they will get a good price for vegetables in summer also. The productivity will also increase due to the use of 

updated techniques. 

Table no. 54:Crop area and yield in the project area 

Sr. No. Name of village Name of crops Pre-project Expected Post-project 



Area (ha) 

Production in Qtl 

Average Yield (kg) 

per ha. 

Area (ha) 

Production in Qtl 

Average Yield 

per ha (kg) 

1 Sarsva (N) 

2 Ditvas 

3 Karvai 

4 Moti Rath 

5 Nani Rath 

6 Bhul 

Kharif 

Maize 150.00 1200.00 8.00 157.50 1320.00 8.80 

Paddy 50.00 350.00 7.00 52.50 385.00 7.70 

Rabi 

Wheat 25.00 6250.00 25.00 26.25 6875.00 27.5 

Kharif 

Maize 175.00 1382.50 7.90 183.75 1520.75 8.69 

Paddy 170.00 1190.00 7.00 178.50 1309.00 7.70 

Rabi 

Wheat 22.00 4708.00 21.4 23.10 5178.80 23.54 

Kharif 

Maize 150.00 1183.50 7.89 157.50 1301.85 8.68 

Paddy 70.00 490.00 7.00 73.50 539.00 7.70 

Rabi 

Wheat 10.00 950.00 95.00 10.50 1045.00 104.50 

Kharif 

Maize 200.00 1620.00 8.10 210.00 1782.00 8.91 

Paddy 75.00 487.50 6.50 78.75 536.25 7.15 

Rabi 

Wheat 8.00 592.00 74.00 8.40 651.20 81.40 

Kharif 

Maize 60.00 480.00 8.00 63.00 528.00 8.80 

Paddy 30.00 195.00 6.50 31.50 214.50 7.15 

Rabi 

Wheat 5.00 237.50 47.50 5.25 261.25 52.25 

Kharif 

Maize 30.00 237.00 7.90 31.50 260.70 8.69 

Paddy 20.00 120.00 6.00 21.00 132.00 6.60 

Rabi 

Wheat 4.00 144.00 36.00 4.20 158.40 39.60 



Kharif 

Maize 25.00 197.25 7.89 26.25 216.98 8.68 


Paddy 15.00 90.00 6.00 15.75 99.00 6.60 

Rabi 

Wheat 4.00 148.00 37.00 4.20 162.80 40.70 

Kharif 

Maize 15.00 120.00 8.00 15.75 132.00 8.80 

8 Tarkoni Nal 

Paddy 10.00 57.50 5.75 10.50 63.25 6.33 

Rabi 

Wheat 3.00 63.00 21.00 3.15 69.30 23.10 

Kharif 

Maize 18.00 142.20 7.90 18.90 156.42 8.69 

9 Amboja 

Paddy 10.00 55.00 5.50 10.50 60.50 6.05 

Rabi 

Wheat 3.00 65.25 21.75 3.15 71.78 23.93 

Kharif 

Maize 8.00 63.12 7.89 8.40 69.43 8.68 


Paddy 7.00 36.75 5.25 7.35 40.43 5.78 

Rabi 

Wheat 3.00 63.00 21.00 3.15 69.30 23.10 

Kharif 

Maize 14.00 112.00 8.00 14.70 123.20 8.80 

11 Sarsadi 

Paddy 10.00 52.50 5.25 10.50 57.75 5.78 

Rabi 

Wheat 4.00 128.00 32.00 4.20 140.80 35.20 

Kharif 

Maize 14.00 112.70 8.05 14.70 123.97 8.86 

12 Rakakot 

Paddy 10.00 57.50 5.75 10.50 63.25 6.33 

Rabi 

Wheat 4.00 144.00 36.00 4.20 158.40 39.60 

Kharif 

13 Jambunala 

Maize 15.00 120.00 8.00 15.75 132.00 8.80 

Paddy 10.00 57.50 5.75 10.50 63.25 6.33 



14 Pacher 

15 Ghaswada 

16 Rankpur 

Rabi 

Wheat 5.00 212.50 42.50 5.25 233.75 46.75 

Kharif 

Maize 20.00 159.00 7.95 21.00 174.90 8.75 

Paddy 15.00 82.50 5.50 15.75 90.75 6.05 

Rabi 

Wheat 3.00 72.00 24.00 3.15 79.20 26.40 

Kharif 

Maize 65.00 523.25 8.05 68.25 575.58 8.86 

Paddy 35.00 245.00 7.00 36.75 269.50 7.70 

Rabi 

Wheat 7.00 490.00 70.00 7.35 539.00 77.00 

Kharif 

Maize 80.00 640.00 8.00 84.00 704.00 8.80 

Paddy 70.00 490.00 7.00 73.50 539.00 7.70 

Rabi 

Wheat 5.00 250.00 50.00 5.25 275.00 55.00 

6.1.3: Horticulture 

The below table shows the area under horticulture proposed to be covered through IWMP-8. The detail village wise description is given as under. 

Table no. 55: Area under horticulture / other crops 

S. No. Name of Village Crop Existing area under the crop Area post project 

1 Sarasva (N) 

0.0 4.5 

2 Ditvas 0.0 4.7 

3 Karvai 0.0 2.5 

4 Motirath 0.0 1.5 

5 Nanirath 0.0 1.7 

Mango, Gauva, Chikoo, Lemon 

6 Bhul 0.0 0.7 

7 Nana Padadara 0.0 0.4 

8 Tarkoninal 0.0 0.7 

9 Ambuja 0.0 1.0 

10 Karodiya (N) 0.0 1.6 


11 Sarasdi 0.0 2.0 

12 Rakakot 0.0 0.4 

13 Jambunala 0.0 0.8 

14 Pacher 0.0 0.7 

15 Ghasvada 0.0 1.6 

16 Rankpur 0.0 1.6 

6.1.4 Livestock 


Table 58 gives the details of livestock in the project villages of the project IWMP-8. The livestock details are given as per the baseline survey. Milch-animals include 

cow and buffalo in the project area. Productivity of the cow is 1-2 liters per day where as the buffalo give 2- 3 litter of milk per day. 

Table no. 56: Details of livestock in the project areas (for fluids please mention in litres, for solids please mention in kgs. and income in Rs.) 

Sr. No. Name of Village Type of Animal 

Pre-Project 

Expected Post-project 

No. Yield Income No. Yield Income 

Milch-animals 260 105 3150 273 116 3465 

1 Sarsva (N) 

Draught Purpose animals 800 0 0 840 0 0 

Animals for other purpose 700 0 0 735 0 0 

Total 1760 105 3150 1848 115.5 3465 

Milch-animals 345 170 5100 362 187 5610 

2 Ditvas 



Total 1740 170 5100 1827 187 5610 

Milch-animals 248 169 5070 260 186 5577 

3 Karvai 



Total 1013 169 5070 1064 186 5577 

Milch-animals 178 40 1200 187 44 1320 

4 Moti Rath 



Total 1170 40 1200 1228.5 44 1320 

Milch-animals 85 18 540 89 20 594 

5 Nani Rath 





Total 417 18 540 437.85 19.8 594 

Milch-animals 35 8 240 37 9 264 

6 Bhul 



Total 261 8 240 274.05 8.8 264 

Milch-animals 40 12 360 42 13 396 




Total 396 12 360 415.8 13.2 396 

Milch-animals 73 9 270 77 10 297 

8 Tarkoni nal 



Total 568 9 270 596.4 9.9 297 

Milch-animals 25 5 150 26 6 165 

9 Amboja 



Total 199 5 150 208.95 5.5 165 

Milch-animals 33 8 240 35 9 264 




Total 203 8 240 213.15 8.8 264 

Milch-animals 40 8 240 42 9 264 

11 Sarasdi 



Total 470 8 240 493.5 8.8 264 

Milch-animals 75 23 690 79 25 759 

12 Rakakot 



Total 260 23 690 273 25.3 759 

Milch-animals 54 18 540 57 20 594 

13 Jambunala 



Total 279 18 540 292.95 19.8 594 



Milch-animals 20 6 180 21 7 198 

14 Pacher 



Total 174 6 180 182.7 6.6 198 

Milch-animals 75 30 900 79 33 990 

15 Ghaswada 



Total 345 30 900 362.25 33 990 

Milch-animals 93 26 780 98 29 858 

16 Rankpur 



Total 441 26 780 463.05 28.6 858 

6.1.5: Employment 

This programme also aims simultaneously to improve the living conditions of the people. Employment opportunities will be generated for the people through 

different soil and water conservation activities and livelihood activities. Self employment would be created by providing the people with cash support in the form of 

direct livelihood activities like agriculture, animal husbandry and enterprise development. 

Table no. 57: Employment to be supplemented in the Project area: 

S. NO. 

Wage employment 

Self employment 


No. of mandays No. of beneficiaries No. of beneficiaries 

Villages 

SC ST Others Women Total SC ST Others Women Total SC ST Others Women Total 

1 

Sarasva 

(N) 

1512 28035 0 8862 42210 144 2670 0 844 2814 12 166 0 16 166 

2 Ditvas 357 15277 0 4683 15634 34 1455 0 446 1489 6 175 0 15 175 

3 Karvai 546 12180 0 3812 12726 52 1160 0 363 1212 8 73 0 6 73 

4 Motirath 577 17377 0 5386 17954 55 1655 0 513 1710 8 104 0 9 104 

5 Nanirath 0 10342 0 3018 10342 0 985 0 295 985 0 62 0 5 62 

6 Bhul 73 5607 0 1701 5680 7 534 0 162 541 2 34 0 3 34 

7 

Nana 

Padadara 

0 2782 0 840 2782 0 265 0 80 265 0 16 0 2 16 

8 Tarkoninal 0 7539 0 2258 7539 0 718 0 215 718 0 45 0 4 45 

9 Ambuja 0 2142 0 640 2142 0 204 0 61 204 0 12 0 1 12 

10 Karodiya 0 3990 0 1197 3990 0 380 0 114 380 0 24 0 2 24 



(N) 

11 Sarasdi 0 8988 0 2688 8988 0 856 0 256 856 0 54 0 5 54 

12 Rakakot 0 1953 0 588 1953 0 186 0 56 168 0 12 0 1 12 

13 Jambunala 0 2436 0 735 2436 0 232 0 70 232 0 15 0 1 15 

14 Pacher 21 3202 0 966 3223 2 305 0 92 307 2 20 0 2 22 

15 Ghasvada 0 7812 0 2342 7812 0 744 0 223 744 0 46 0 4 46 

16 Rankpur 336 11256 0 4389 11592 32 1072 0 418 1394 4 67 0 6 71 

6.1.6 Expected Migration Checked 

Watershed development works can - 

‣ Generate new opportunities in local area through the physical treatments of the watershed activities, 

‣ Increase the production of agriculture produces through adopting updated/ new techniques, 

‣ The number of crop cultivation will increase as the ground water level available to the farmers in the winter and summer season i.e. the farmers will able to 

take second and third crop in their agriculture land. 

Hence the Watershed development increased demands for labour. This will lead to decrease in the number of seasonal migration from the area. 

Table no. 58: Seasonal migration from Project area 

Sl. No. Names of villages No. of persons migrating 

No. of days per year of 

migration 

Pre-project Expected post project Pre-project Expected post project 

1 Sarasva (N) 690 290 165 30 

2 Ditvas 838 238 160 30 

3 Karvai 308 95 158 30 

4 Motirath 1225 320 169 30 

5 Nanirath 278 78 168 30 

6 Bhul 168 68 155 30 

7 Nana Padadara 180 74 158 30 

8 Tarkoninal 242 97 162 30 

9 Ambuja 130 45 163 30 

10 Karodiya (N) 228 56 175 30 

11 Sarasdi 324 103 152 30 

12 Rakakot 178 68 167 30 

13 Jambunala 98 28 173 30 

14 Pacher 198 94 175 30 

15 Ghasvada 212 42 152 30 


16 Rankpur 394 92 148 30 

Table no.59: Per capital Income 


Sr. No. Project name Source of Income Pre-project Expected post project 

Agriculture 12594 15113 

Forestry 0 200 

Animal Husbandry 16 19 

Casual Labour 1884 2261 


Services 1297 1427 

Handicraft 0 0 

Business 0 0 

Others 1284 1412 

Total 17076 20432 

6.1.7 Backward-Forward linkages 

The sustainable livelihood activities need good forward and backward support. Without such support system the activities may fail to deliver the desired results. 

These linkages would involve credit, machinery, input supply, marketing, etc. The details are given as under. 

Table no. 60: Backward-Forward linkages 

S. No. Project Type of Marketing Facility Pre-project (no.) During the project (no.) Post-project (no.) 

Backward linkages 0 0 0 

Seed certification 0 0 0 

Seed supply system 0 0 0 

Fertilizer supply system 0 0 0 

Pesticide supply system 0 0 0 

Credit institutions 0 0 0 

Water supply 0 0 0 

1 IWMP 7 Extension services 0 KVK, NGO KVK, NGO 

Nurseries 0 Yes Yes 

Tools/machinery suppliers 0 Yes Yes 

Price Support system 0 0 0 

Labour 0 0 0 

Any other (please specify) (Organic manuare) 0 Vermi compost Vermi compost 

Forward linkages 0 0 0 

Harvesting/threshing machinery 0 0 0 


6.2 Logical Frame Work Analysis 


Storage (including cold storage) 0 0 0 

Road network 0 0 0 

Transport facilities 0 0 0 

Markets / Mandis 0 0 0 

Agro and other Industries 0 0 0 

Milk and other collection centres 0 0 0 

Labour 0 0 0 

Any other (please specify) 0 0 0 

Logical Frame Work Analysis (LFA) describes the project goal, objectives, and the activities which will help to achieve the objective. This frame also gives expected 

results, performance variable indictors, mean of verification and the risk and assumptions of the project. The monitoring team and evaluation team should follow 

the frame for the achievements. Natural disaster, political intervention and pre-conception of the local people may become obstacle in front the success of the 

project. It was found that, Person of this area believes that the work related to the bamboo handi-craft lower the social status in the society. Hence after the training 

of the handi-craft, the people are not using the skill for the betterment. 

The means of the verification will help the monitoring team to verify the things where as the performance variable indicators are the indicators of the project which 

shows the success or failure. 

Sr 

no 

Goals 

1 

PROJECT STRATEGY 

(Goals, Objectives, 

Purpose, Activities, 

outcomes/outputs) 

Restoring ecological 

balance and increasing 

productivity in such 

region necessitate 

undertaking all 

developmental 

activities 


OBJECTIVELY VERIFIABLE 

INDICATORS(OVI) 

Promote appropriate technologies for 

efficient and sustainable use of rainwater 

Conservation of soil and improve the land 

productivity 

Regenerate the vegetation cover on 

denuded wastelands, promote tree based 

farming systems and sustainable agriculture 

MEANS OF VERIFICATION(MOV) 

Identify high-quality natural features, 

map them, and include them in 

planning documents. 

Improvement in vegetative cover. 

Increase ground water table in the 

well and irrigated area. 

Better agricultural yields. 

ASSUMPTIONS/RISKS/CHALLENGES 

Social and political stability 

No major environmental 

catastrophes (e.g. drought, 

earthquake etc) 

Absence of conflicts in project area


Improve Livestock Productivity 

Identify and protect greenway corridors. 

Increase per capita income of local 

people by wage employment and self 

employment. 

2 

Ensure sustainable 

growth and 

development. 

Bring the underprivileged sections of 

society in to the mainstream 

Equip rural communities for sustainable 

management of the natural resources. 

Backward and Forward linkages 

Work available within the village and 

therefore no need for migration 

Proper maintained and care taking of 

the physical assets 

Desired participation of people 

Self reliant through livelihood 

Willingness of villagers to work 

together for future 

Normal trend of population 

growth 

Objectives 

Building community organisations 

Soil and water Conservation 

1 

Rainfed 

Development 

Area 

Increase vegetative cover of the project 

area. 

Increase in water availability in the project 

area 

Decrease in soil erosion, run off, and silt 

load. 

Waste and pasture land development 

Physical verification by site visit. 

Satellite imagery (GIS) of the project 

area. 

Asset registration at Grampanchayat. 

Local people’s view. 

Measurement Book 

Site selection is accurate. 

All the activity will give the best 

results 

2 

Creation of new 

livelihood 

opportunities 

Afforastation and Plantation. 

Wage employment generation through 

Physical structure work. 

Self employment through SHG activity link 

up with bankable project. 

No of SHG formation and link up with 

bankable project. 

Mandays Generate through Physical 

work. 

All work through man power and 

minimum utilization of machine. 



Livelihood activity as per the local people’s 

competency. 

Mitigation of migration 

Production system and Micro enterprise 

activity for value addition 

Maintained Accountability of the fund 

Efficient site selection 

Cost Benefit ratio calculation 

3 

Effective management 

and budgetary control. 

Local People’s contribution 

Proper utilization of available fund. 

Internal rate of return(IRR) 

Fund available from convergence. 

All activity will give efficient result. 

Maintenance of accounts and records by the 

villagers themselves. 

Link up facilities of agri-input like hybrid 

seed, pesticide, and fertilizer. 

Watershed Development Fund 

4 

Backward and forward 

linkages 

Extension services through capacity 

building. 

Market link up by value addition of agrioutput. 

Increase facilities for agri-input and 

agri-output. 

Increase income from agriculture. 

Climatic condition is favourable for 

agriculture 

5 

Women’s Sociopolitical 

and economic 

empowerment 


Micro enterprise activity for value addition. 

Women along with men are taking part in 

community level decision making process. 

Self Help Groups of men and women both. 

Adequate representation of women, 

different 

Efforts are taken to build the capacity of 

women 

leads to active participation of 

women in the watershed 

development projects 

Linking SHGs with external financial 

institutions 

Improved access to credit for 

livelihood purposes. 

No internal conflict will rise. 

Everyone participate positively. 

Success story of the SHG activity. 

Purposes 

1 Participation various 75 percent of the women and the weaker Socio-economic survey Favourable socio-cultural


sections of the 

watershed community 

section(SC/ST, landless) attending meetings 

and voicing their thoughts 

Gramshabha 

conditions at the village 

Effective Net panning 

UGs and SHGs 

Increase new Livelihood opportunities for 

assetless and resource poor. 

 

Village Watershed Committee. 

2 

Increase in living 

standard of the people. 

Increase income through new practices of 

agricultural activity. 

Social statues 

Increase in per capita income. 

Reduce migration rate. 

Socio-economic survey 

Smooth flow of funds 

3 

Capacity building of 

community 

organization specially 

of the women and the 

weaker sections 

Increase in purchasing capacity of the 

villagers, particularly the poor. 

50 per cent of the households, particularly 

the weaker section, should be members of 

either Self Help Groups or User Groups. 

Need assessment 

Crucial component for achieving the desired 

results. 

Annual Action Plan for Capacity 

Building 

Mechanism for effective monitoring 

and follow-up. 

More no of participation in the 

capacity building programme. 

Activities 

1 

Community 

mobilisation 

Well prepared training modules and reading 

materials 

programmes like immunization, eradicating 

illiteracy; empowerment of the weak and 

the underprivileged, creating self managed 

institutions of the poor etc. 

To create sustained behavioral change that 

will bring about community participation 

for sustainability and self-reliance. 

No of SHGs and UGs formed 

People participation in decision 

making process. 

Social Audit. 

Gramshabha 

Religion conflict 

Communal related opposition 

Social Mobilization is the process of pooling 

Success story 



together, harnessing, actualizing and 

utilizing potential human resources for the 

purpose of development. 

organizing the target groups to take 

initiatives and assert themselves 

Social Mobilization as a means for Human 

Resource Development 

To create equalities among the various 

communities 

Identification of their needs and problems 

Each village has Village watershed 

committee (VWC). 

2 

Formation of village 

level organisations 

Formation of Watershed Committee, User 

Group 

Registration of VWC 

Unity and prosperity in the village 

management. 

Number of User group depending on the 

coverage of particular intervention 

Ridge to valley approach 

Final Action Plan Map 

Ridge area and Drainage line treatment 

Physical verification 

Encroachment 

3 

Water 

works 

harvesting 

Maps (Cadastral map, Drainage and water 

bodies, Contour Map) 

Appropriate Site selection and structure 

selection. 

GIS imagery 

Local people’s view 

Measurement Book 

Internal conflict 

Local Political involvement 

Affoastation and Agroforestry 

Final Action Plan Map 

4 

Vegetative 

improvement work 


GIS imagery 

Success ratio of plantation is 100 

percentages. 

outcomes/outputs 

 

New Agricultural Practises 



1 

Increase soil moisture 

index 

Soil and water conservation activities 

Ground water recharge. 

Engineering structure for surface irrigation 

Productivity enhancement through new 

agricultural practices. 

Soil sample testing 

Improvement in Irrigated land 

Soil condition is batter 


Inter and multi cropping system 

2 

Increase in crop 

production 

Improvement in farm mechanisation 

High nutritional value traditional crops 

should not be totally replaced by high 

yielding varieties. 

Productivity improvement 

Change in cropping pattern 

Enough Rain fall will fall in the 

project area. 

Selection of high productive native species 

over exotic species. 

Use of bio-compost, organic mulch (Green 

manure) and vermi-compost will result in 

lesser use of permissible chemical fertilizers 

and pesticides 

New sources of drinking water 

3 

Increase in water 

availability in the 

watershed area 

Repairing and renovation of existing 

drinking water facilities 

Regular disinfections by chlorination and 

use of filters will reduce chances of water 

borne diseases. 

Ground water table 

Water sample testing 

Rainfall is enough to meet daily 

water need of project area. 

4 

Increase in fuel and 

fodder availability 

Increase in the proportion of households 

having more security of fodder 

Reduction in drudgery of fodder collection 

Decrease in Migration due to fodder 

unavailability. 

Livestock growth is normal 



especially women 

Pasture land and wasteland will be 

developed. 

Quantity of fodder saved/consumed. 



Chapter 7 

QUALITY AND SUSTAILABILITY OF THE PROJECT 



Introduction: Chapter-7 deals with the plan in which the activities of watershed IWMP 7 Project of Panchmahal maintain the quality and renders the project 

sustainable. In details the chapter describes that the proper and regular monitoring and evaluation of the project can trimming down the improper implementation 

of activities so that the quality can be controlled at the right time. The chapter extends with the appropriate post-project techniques for project sustainability and 

research and documentation for maintaining the records, locate the loop falls in implementing and follow up the project with a new and suitable adaptation for the 

area development. 

7.1 Plans for Monitoring and Evaluation: 

To control the activities at the stage of implementing proper plans has formed for monitoring and Evaluation. Project monitoring is one of the important 

components in watershed development programmes. The broad objectives of a watershed project demand good monitoring framework. A monitoring framework is 

suggested which within the capacity of watershed development teams and watershed committees. No great deal of training, human resources or instruments are 

expected to be employed. The monitoring should actually assist the project team to provide a guideline for improvement in the activities and output the project. 

Selection of an appropriate measure for the given area and ensuring the quality of project measures to be given great attention at the time of monitoring. 

7.1.1 Three Ties of Monitoring: Three tiers of monitoring are planned – 

First Tire (Monitoring of activities): 

This is carried out by the head of local PO’s along with part time workers to monitor the implementation of all activities as per the action plan. The 

monitoring also aims at ensuring that the quality of work is as per the guidelines prescribed for each activity. 

Second Tire (Monitoring of outputs): 

To check the outputs of the activities, project coordinators along with the part time workers monitors as per the logical frame work. The indicators are 

selected considering the broad objectives of the project. One can adopt or modify these as per requirement at the time of implementation. The output level 

indicators needs to be devised by the project team based on the outcome level indicators on. Outputs need to be monitored frequently, may be once in a quarter/ six 

months. 

Third Tire (Monitoring of Outcomes): 



Project reviewing committee along with the project co-coordinator will monitor the overall outcomes of the objectives as per the log frame. The outcomes 

level monitoring may start in the second year and continue on an annual basis. Most of the information can be available from the sets of output level indicators. 

Participatory methods should be used at the time of monitoring the activities. 

The methods of collecting samples data for the monitoring activities should be clearly documented in the monitoring report. The detail of the monitoring system is 

presented in the table as under. 

Table no 60. Details of Monitoring system proposed for the project 

Tiers of Monitoring Basis of monitoring Frequency of monitoring Orientation of the Indicator Monitoring by 

First tier 

Immediate result 

basis 

Regular Monthly Monitoring Activity oriented Local People organizations 

Second Tier 

Monitoring of Regular monitoring (Quarterly, 

Internal project team (WDT, PIA, MDT, Experts and 

Objective oriented 

Outputs 

half yearly and annually ) 

PM) 

Third Tier 

1. Specified monitoring team formed by DWDU, 

Monitoring of Annually but monitoring start 

Goal Oriented 

2. External Monitoring team by GSWMA 

Outcomes 

from second year onwards? 

Apart from the above mentioned monitoring system, there are a Web-based GIS System is being developed for monitoring and evaluating the project in its 

planning & implementation phases. The system would be available on a public domain and can be accessed by all the stakeholders of the project. The system shows 

the entire state of Gujarat and all of those areas selected over the next 18 years. Filtering allows the user to zoom onto one particular project. Details related to soil 

type, Land-use classification, inhabitation etc., can be obtained village-wise. Furthermore, survey-number wise details related to ownership, irrigation source, yield 

etc., can also be accessed by the users of the system. This system is being used for pooling up the details obtained from the DPR. In other words, the DPR is made 

available online in the form of a database which will help the stakeholders know areas of importance viz., already treated areas/historical works in the area, 

proposed areas for treatment etc., for further treatment and planning. The system would also show the satellite imageries of various years from the project 

inception stage to the project closing stages. This allows the user to evaluate the effectiveness of the treatment and thereby plan corrective measures for the project 

area. The system would serve as an aiding tool to the planners and evaluators for judging the efficacy of the project. 



Yet another component of the Web-based GIS system is the Mobile based Monitoring & Evaluation System, which will help the ground staff alias WDTs 

(Watershed Development Team) to transmit information from the ground level to the central server. Also, any higher-up official in charge of the project can obtain 

information regarding the project area on their mobile phone by means of an SMS. The system works in the following manner. The WDT equipped with a GPS 

instrument marks the latitude-longitude information of various treatment areas during the DPR. The probable sites are then transferred onto the central server. 

During the works phase, any progress in the treatment areas is reported to the server by means of an SMS by the WDT. Similarly, any nodal officer or higher-up 

official can view the progress in a project by means of summarized reports generated over frequent periods of time. 

7.1.2 Evaluation: 

The project will be evaluated by the external agency after the project completion to see the impact of the project in the area. The external agency should use 

the monitoring tool specified in the DPR of the project and should consider the assumptions and risk mentioned in the DPR because these are the factors which may 

be an obstacle in the implementation of the project. The agency will be decided by the State Nodal Agency (GSWMA) at the time of the evaluation. The evaluation 

will be evaluate that the goal is achieved or not after the implementation of the project. 

7.2 Plans for Post-Project Management/Sustainability Approach: 

Watershed development project can be rendered sustainable through an appropriate combination of environmental balance, community participation and 

institutionalization of process. So the detail plans for the post project management are described as under: 

7.2.1 Adopting Environment friendly conservation measures 

The measures taken up will be long lasting. Along with engineering measures, efforts will also be made to establish forest cover in the upper catchment 

areas and on the slopes. The downstream area will have prolonged stream flows. The stream banks should also be vegetated to create a buffer between land and 

water bodies. Such vegetation helps in stabilizing streams, enhancing recharge and improving the riparian habitat. 

An including species of trees and grasses will be selected for developing a vegetative cover at the time of implementation of IWMP 7 project of Panchmahal. 

The diversity of vegetative measures is the key to sustainability. Combination of shallow and deep-rooted plants, fast and slow growing plants, productive and 



medical plants and herbs will be encouraged. The vegetation created will ultimately help to recharge the rainwater, use the soil moisture optimally and provide 

direct and indirect benefits to the community and environment as a whole. 

Land use pattern will go hand in hand with carrying capacity of the watershed. Optimum use of water and increased use of organic fertilizers is the key to 

conserve the precious land source. Water overuse and excessive fertilization leads to permanent damage of lands and groundwater. 

It is important to maintain soil quality through crop management. Crop diversity and crop rotation helps in improving the micro flora and fauna present in 

the soil and maintaining the healthy symbiotic subsystems relationship. 

7.2.2 Participation of local community in development and management 

During the planning phase the local people’s participation were involved and it is planned that the involvement during implementation and post project 

maintenance will enhance the impact of project and maintain the structures. However, participation without empowerment does not help in achieving sustainable 

development. So People will be made aware of different concepts and options for their livelihood and natural resource management. Local wisdom is important in 

understanding rural dynamics that includes the interface between human behavior and its economic / ecological implications. The interests of a community will be 

created and maintained by adopting the measures in such a manner that they provide immediate, medium term and long term benefits to the community. 

7.2.3 Institutionalization for post project management 

A dynamic institutional arrangement is necessary for project management, facilitation of benefit sharing and maintenance of the resources. This usually 

includes small user groups for different resources / assets as well as village level organizations. In-built system and mechanisms will be developed for qualitative 

growth and dynamisms of the organizations. The community organizations should be linked to other Government and Non Government institutes of interest. The 

potential people’s organizations were formed in the project area include Watershed level Organization and Users Groups. 

Watershed level Committee 

Watershed level organization is established right from the beginning of the project. The overall planning, coordination, management and maintenance are 

possible through this representative body. This clearly implies representation from different sections of the community – landholders and landless, upper reach and 

lower reach, men and women, lower and upper castes, Gram Panchayat and other existing political or non political organizations. 



User Groups 

The other categories of institutions are formed of various groups with common areas of interest in the project area named user groups. These include, 

depending upon necessity, Self Help Groups of women and men, User Groups for common assets, Natural Clubs, etc. The capacities of different groups will be 

developed time to time for effective functioning of these groups. A mechanism will be developed to ensure continuity, both in learning, functioning and actions that 

from responsibilities of such groups during the implementation project activities. 



Chapter 8 

Maps 



Anexxure 

Technical Details of the Soil and Moisture conservation works of the Project IWMP 7 

Gully Plug: 

Feasibility of the Structure in Project Villages is: The structure is very much suitable for this project due to the following reasons: 

Villages has Moderate slopes 

Presence of gullies in this project area 

The region has shallow soil depth. 

It is a more permanent structure if well maintained 

It is self stabilizing 

Technical Specification of the Gully Plug: Table no40.6 gives the technical specification of Gully Plug of project villages under the project IWMP 7. 

Technical Specification of Gully Plug 

Particulars Value Units 

Top width of Gully Plug 0.60 Meter 

Bottom width of Gully Plug 0.60 Meter 

Depth above ground level 1.00 Meter 

Depth of Foundation 0.90 Meter 

Cross section of Gully Plug 0.99 Sq. Meter 

Proposed Area 0.5 Ha 

Cost Estimation of Gully Plug of Village: The cost is estimated as per the SOR rate of R & B, Panchmahl. The detail cost of gully Plug is as under. 

Cost Estimation of Gully Plug 

Sr. No Description Quantity Unit Rate 

Amount 

(Rs) 

Remarks 



1 Excavation for fdn ………………………....Hard soil 2.70 Cmt 60.00 162.00 

2 

Providing and laying c.c. 1:4:8 ………….. etc comp 

0.45 Cmt 1836.00 826.20 

3 Providing UCR masonry ……………… in fdn & Pli. 5.31 Cmt 1705.00 9053.55 

4 Providing and laying c.c. 1:2:4 ………….. etc comp 0.30 Cmt 2738.00 821.40 

5 Providing 20 mm plastering on ....... in c.m. 1:4 etc comp. 14.16 Smt 108.00 1529.28 

6 Prodding and fixing Name Plate ……… etc comp. 1 No 216.00 216.00 

3.00 to 6.00 

Meter 

average 

Length of one 

Gully Plug 

Total 12608.43 

Say Estimate cost of one Gully Plug 13000.00 

Nala Plug 

Feasibility of the Structure in Project Villages is: The structure is very much suitable for this project due to the following reasons: 

Villages has much Moderate slopes 


Nalla are mostly seen in the project area. 

To control the erosion 

The region has shallow soil depth. 

Technical Specification of the Nalla Plug Type-1: 

It is a more permanent structure if well maintained 

Two types of Nalla Plug are proposed to see the location and the area of the villages. The types are different in the total unit cost. The cost of type one is Rs. 

50,000.00 where the other type has cost of Rs. 60,000.00 

Technical Details of Nalla Plug 


Top width of Nala Plug 0.50 Meter 

Bottom width of Nala Plug 1.20 Meter 

Height above ground level 1.10 Meter 

Depth of Foundation 1.15 Meter


Cross section of Nala Plug 0.93 Sq. Meter 

Unit cost 1.00 Ha 

Cost Estimation of Nala Plug type -1 

Sr. No Description Quantity Unit Rate(Rs) 

Amount 

(Rs) 



3 Providing UCR masonry 1:6 ………… in fdn & Pli. 23.65 Cmt 1602.00 37887.30 


5 Providing Pointing on ....... in c.m. 1:3 etc comp. 39.15 Smt 44.00 1722.60 

6 Prodding and fixing Name Plate ……… etc comp. 1.00 No 339.00 339.00 

Total 49927.80 

Estimate cost of one Nala Plug 50,000/- 

Cost Estimation of Nala Plug type-2 

Sr. No Description Quantity Unit Rate (Rs) 

Amount 

(Rs) 



3 Providing UCR masonry 1:6 ………… in fdn & Pli. 28.34 Cmt 1602.00 45400.68 


5 Providing Pointing on ....... in c.m. 1:3 etc comp. 41.32 Smt 44.00 1818.08 

6 Prodding and fixing Name Plate ……… etc comp. 1.00 No 339.00 339.00 

Total 59,603.40/- 

Estimate cost of one Nala Plug 60,000/- 

Remarks 

9.00 to 12.00 

Meter 

average 


Nala Plug 

Remarks 

9.00 to 12.00 

Meter 

average 


Nala Plug 

Contour Trenches 


U/S 

0.70 mt 


Plantation & Fodder 

D/S 

GL 

GL 

0.60 mt 

0.30 mt 

Technical Details of Contour Trenches 


Trench Top Width 0.70 Meter 

Trench Bottom Width 0.30 Meter 

Trench Depth 0.60 Meter 

Estimation of Contour Trenches 

Cam Description Unit 

1 Earth Work 

Earth work in excavation in foundation/ trench up to 1.5 meter 

depth. Compaction of bottom, correction of sides, refilling of 

blank spaces with soil and disposal of remaining soil up to 50 

meter. 

In ordinary/ soft soil 


Length Width Depth Quantity Rate Amount 

(Mt.) (Mt.) (Mt.) (Cum)

In hard soil Cmt 1 .00 

0.70+0.30 

2 


0.60 0.30 60.00 18.00 

Fragmented rock 

ordinary rock 

2 Vegetative Work 

Supply of Stylo/ Dhaman Seed, Ketki 4 gm/ Meter in two lines 

1.00 1.00 mt 12.00 12.00 

and plantation cost (L.S.) 

Unit cost per RMT 30.00 

Staggered Trenches 

Plantation & Fodder 

U/S 

D/S 

GL 

GL 

0.45 mt 

0.60 mt 

Technical Details of Staggered Trenches 




Trench Length 2.50 Meter 

Trench Width 0.60 Meter 

Trench Depth 0.45 Meter 

Cost Estimation of Staggered Trenches 

Sr. 

No 

Description 

Nos 

Length Width Depth Quantity Rate (Rs) 

(Mt.) (Mt.) (Mt.) (Cum) 

Amount 

(Rs) 

1 Earth Work 

Earth work in excavation in foundation/ trench up to 1.5 meter 

depth. Compaction of bottom, correction of sides, refilling of blank 

spaces with soil and disposal of remaining soil up to 50 meter. 

In ordinary/ soft soil 

In hard soil 1 2.50 0.60 0.45 0.675 60.00 40.50 

Fragmented rock 

ordinary rock 

2 Vegetative Work 

Supply of Stylo/ Dhaman Seed, Ketki 4 gm/ Meter in two lines and 

plantation cost (L.S.) 

Unit cost of the Staggered trenches 

1 1Nos 9.50 9.50 

50.00 Rs 

Land Leveling 

Technical details of Land Leveling 


Average Cutting Length 50.00 Meter 



Average Cutting Width 20.00 Meter 

Average Cutting Depth 

0.15 Meter 

Total Average Cutting Area 150.00 Cmt 

Cost Estimation of Land Leveling 


1 

Amount 

(Rs) 

Excavation for fdn ………………………....Hard soil 150.00 Cmt 60.00 9000.00 

Total 9000.00 

Remarks 

Say Estimate cost of Land Leveling 

9000.00 Rs/Ha 

Earthen Bund 

Technical details of Earth Bund 


Structure Length 10.00 Meter 

Structure Height 1.00 Meter 

Upstream Slope 1 : 1 - 

Downstream Slope 1 : 1 - 

Bund Top Width 1.00 Meter 

Structure Base Width 3.00 Meter 

Structure Cross Section 2.00 Smt 

Cost Estimation of Earth Bund 

Sr. 

Description 

No 

No. 

Length 

(Mt.) 

Width 

(Mt) 

Depth 

(Mt) 

Qty 

(Cmt 

Rate 

(Rs) 

Amount (Rs) 



1 

Earth Work Construction of earthen bund (dry of moist) 

excavation 

and lying in 15 cm layer, breaking of clods. Separating leaves and 

small Stonees, dressing and compaction with 

sheep foot roller or 

hand rammer 

Up to 1.5 meter lift and 50 meter lead. 

a)ordinary soil 

b)hard soil 

3.00 + 1.00 

1 10.00 

2 

1.00 20.00 60.00 1200.00 

2 Providing 300 mm Thick Pucca Rubble Pitching in cm 1:5 

Proportion Width the surface pointed with cm 1:3 etc comp. for 

all Leads and Lifts 

U/S and D/S 2 2.50 - 0.90 4.50 504.80 2271.60 

Top 1 2.50 - 1.20 3.00 504.80 1514.40 

Total 4986.00 

Unit Cost of Earthen Bund 

5000/ Nos 

Farm Bund 


1:1 


U/S 

0.30 m t 

D/S 

1:1 

0.60 mt 

GL 

1.50 m t 

GL 

Technical details of Farm Bund 


Structure Length 1.00 Meter 

Structure Height 0.60 Meter 

Upstream Slope 1 : 1 

Downstream Slope 1 : 1 

Bund Top Width 0.30 Meter 

Structure Base Width 1.50 Meter 

Structure Cross Section 0.54 Smt 

Estimation of Farm Bund 


1 General Work 1.5 Smt 3.00 4.50 

Clearing bushes / Dag Belling 2.5 to 5.00 cm Deep 

Amount 

(Rs) 

Remarks 

2 

Excavation for fdn ………………………....Hard soil 

0.54 Cmt 60.00 32.40 



3 

Vegetative Work 

Sowing of seed on the constructed ridge 

Supply of Style/ Damon @ 4 gm /mt in (single line) 

4.00 Gm - 5.00 

Total 41.90 

Say Estimate cost of Farm Bund 

42 Rs/rmt 

Rain Roof Well Recharge 

Technical Details and Cost Estimation of Rain Roof Well Recharge 


1 

Providing and fixing P.V.C. Pipe @110 mm Dia …….. etc Comp. 

Amount 

(Rs) 

30.00 Rmt 275.00 8250.00 

Remarks 

Total 8250.00 

Say Estimate cost of one Rain Roof Well Recharge 8300.00 

Check Dam 

Technical Details of Check Dam 


Top width of Body Wall 1.00 Meter 

Bottom width of Body Wall 2.50 Meter 

Top Width of Key Wall 1.00 Meter 

Top Width of Toe Wall 0.45 Meter 

Total Height of Check Dam (From G.L.) 1.30 Meter 

Total Height of Check Dam 3.20 Meter 

Total Length Check Dam 23.20 Meter 

Cost Estimation of Check Dam type 


Amount 

(Rs) 


Remarks 


2 Excavation for fdn ………………………....Hard Murom 80.33 Cmt 102.00 8193.15 

3 Excavation for fdn ………………………...Soft Rocks 16.07 Cmt 107.00 1718.96 


5 Providing UCR masonry 1 : 5…………… in fdn & Pli. 188.60 Cmt 1705.00 321563.00 


7 Providing 20 mm plastering on.... in c.m. 1:3 etc comp. 195.30 Smt 112.00 21873.60 

8 Prodding and fixing Name Plate ……… etc comp. 1.00 Nos 339.00 339.00 

Total 449753.91 

Estimate cost of one Check Dam 4,50,000/-

IWMP 7 - Commissionerate of Rural Development Gujarat State ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?