Detailed Project Report - Commissionerate of Rural Development ...

GUJARAT STATE WATERSHED MANAGEMENT AGENCY 

Detailed Project Report 

IWMP-1 (Patan) 

District Watershed Development Unit - Jamnagar

Detailed Project Report – IWMP-1 (Patan ) 


District Watershed Development Unit - Jamnagar 

Detailed Project Report 

IWMP-1 (PATAN) 


Detailed Project Report – IWMP-1 (Patan )



TABLE OF CONTENTS 

Project Background........................................................................................................................... .................. .................. ........................................ ........9 

Table no.1: Basic project information.................................................................................................................. ................ .................. .............................9 

Table no.2: Watershed information............................................................................................................. .................. ........... ................ ..........................9 

Table no.3: Weight age of the project........................................................................................................................................ .................. ........................11 

Table no.4: Developmental programmers running in the project area:......................................................................................... ................ ................13 

Table no.5: Previous Watershed programmers in the project area: ........ ........ ..............................................................................................................12 

Project Implementing Agency.......................................................................................................................................................................................16 

Table no. 6: PIA:..................................... ............... ............... ............... ............... ............... ............... ............... ............... ............... ………...................20 

Table no. 7: Staff at PIA level: ....................................................................................................................................... ....... ............... …………….........20 

Basic Information of Project Area .............................................................................................................................................................................23 

Table no. 8: Land use Pattern: .............................................................................................................................................................................................24 

Table no. 9: Soil type and Topography:................................................................................................................................................................................25 

Table no. 10: Flood and drought condition:..........................................................................................................................................................................26 

Table no. 11: Soil Erosion.....................................................................................................................................................................................................26 

Table no. 12 Climatic Condition…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………...26 

Table no. 13: Physiography and relief................................................................... ................... ................... ................... ................... ...............................27 

Table no. 14: Land ownership details ................................................................................................................ .... .... .... .... .... .... .... ...............................28 

Table no. 15: Agriculture .....................................................................................................................................................................................................28 

Table no. 16: Irrigation.......................................................... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... ..........................28 

Table no. 17: Livestock................................................................................................................................................................................ …………….... .29 

Table no. 18: Drinking Water………….............................................. .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... ................................................29


Table no. 19: Demographic Information…....................................... .... .... ... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... ..............................30 

Table no. 20: Literacy Rate.............................................. .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... ....... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... ............................30 

Table no. 21: Migration details......................................................... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... ….........................................31 

Table no. 22: Poverty……….................................................................................................................................................................... .... .........................31 

Table no. 23:Village Infrastructure.................................................. .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .. .... ...............................32 

Table no. 24: Facilities/HH assets..................................... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .....................33 

Tableno. 25:Income......................................................... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... . .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .......................33 

Tableno. 26: Dependenceon Forest/CPR…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..34 

Tableno. 27: Livelihood Pattern(Occupational Distribution)……………………………………………………………………………………………34 

Watershed Activities ..................................................... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... ........................38 

Table no. 28: Details of Scientific Planning and Inputs in IWMP projects ......................................................................................... .... ........................43 

Table no. 29: Watershed Committee details.......................................................................................................................................... .... ……………....45 

Table no. 29.1: Watershed Committee details(Paradva) ..................................................................................................................... .... ……………....46 

Table no. 29.2: Watershed Committee details(Amrapar)………………………………...................................................................... .... ……………....47 

Table no. 29.3: Watershed Committee details(Malavada)…..…………………………...................................................................... .... ……………....47 

Table no. 30: SHG detail......................................................................................................................... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .............................50 

Table No. 31 The following types of groups were planned to be formed in Patan Project……... ...................................................................................45 

Table no. 32: UG detail............................................................................................... .................... .................... .................... ............................................51 

Table no. 33: Entry Point Activites(EPA) ……......................................................... .................... .................... .................... ...........................................52 

Table no.34: Details of activates of preparatory phase…………………………………………………………………………………………………..53 

Table 35: Activities Related to Surface water resources in the Project Areas…………………………… .....................................................................58 

Table no:36: Activities related to ground water resources in the project areas...............................................................................................................60 



Table no: 37: Activities related to livelihoods by Self Help Group(SHGs)........................................................................................................................61 

Table no.:38 Other Activities of Watershed work phase-Proposed target…….................................................................................................................63 

Table no.39 Detail of Engineering Structures in Watershed work…………....................................................................................................................64 

Table no. 39.1 Technical Specification of stone bund…......................................................................................................................................................67 

Table no. 39.2, Technical Details of Staggered Contour Trenches ....................................................................................................................................68 

Table no 39.3, Quantity Calculation......................................................................................................................................................................................69 

Table no 39.4, Cost Estimation of Staggered contour trench and stone bounding...........................................................................................................70 

Table no. 39.5 Cost Estimation of Staggered contour trench per village…………………………………………..…………………………………...71 

Table No 39.5, Technical Details of Border Contour Trench.............................................................................................................................................66 

Table no 39.2, Quantity Calculation of Border Contour trench ........................................................................................................................................66 

Table No 39.3. Cost Estimation of Border Contour .............................................................................................................................................................67 

Table no 40.1. Technical details of Earth Bund No.l............................................................................................................................................................68 

Table no 40.2, Quantity Calculation of Earth Bund No.l ...................................................................................................................................................69 

Table No, 40.3, Cost Estimation of Earth Bund No.l...........................................................................................................................................................69 

Table No, 41.1, Technical Details of Afforestation Activities.............................................................................................................................................70 

Table No, 41.2, Cost Estimation for afforestation activity..................................................................................................................................................70 

Table No, 42.1 Technical Details of Farm Pond 1................................................................................................................................................................71 

Table No, 42.2, Quantity Excavation for Farm Pond 1........................................................................................................................................................71 

Table No, 42.3, Cost Estimation of Farm pond No.l...........................................................................................................................................................72 

Table No, 43.1, Technical Details of Farm Bund ................................................................................................................................................................73 

Table No, 43.2, Quantity Excavation for Farm bund...........................................................................................................................................................73 

Table No. 44 Cost Estimation of Farm Bund No.l...............................................................................................................................................................74 

Table No. 45, Summary of Soil and water conservation Structures and activity...............................................................................................................75 



Table no. :46, Details of activities of preparatory phase (All financial figures in lakh Rs.)..............................................................................................75 

Table no.: 47, Institutes Identified for Capacity Building..................................................................................................................................................77 

Budgeting.................................................................................................................................................................................................................................79 

Table no. 48: Budget at a glance............................................................................................................................................................................................79 

Table no.49: Details of Convergence of IWMP with other Schemes ................................................................................................................................80 

Table no. 50: Public-Private Partnership in the IWMP projects........................................................................................................................................80 

Table no. 51: Employment in Project area...........................................................................................................................................................................82 

Table no. 52, Details of seasonal migration from Project area ..........................................................................................................................................83 

Table no. 53: Details of average ground water table depth in the project areas (in meters) ............................................................................................83 

Table no. 54: Status of Drinking water.................................................................................................................................................................................84 

Table no. 55 : Details of crop area and yield in the project areas .......................................................................................................................................84 

Table no. 56: Area under horticulture..................................................................................................................................................................................85 

Table no. 57: Forest/vegetative cover...................................................................................................................................................................................85 

Table no. 58: Details of livestock in the project areas (for fluids please mention in litres, for solids please mention in kgs. and income 

inRs.)........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................86 

Table no. 59: Backward-Forward linkages..........................................................................................................................................................................87 

Quality and Sustainability Issues..........................................................................................................................................................................................94 

Table No. 60. Details of Watershed Development Fund (WDF) ........................................................................................................................................95 



CHAPTER - 1 

PROJECT BACKGROUND 



1.1 Project Background 

Patan (IWMP-1) project is located in Jam Jodhpur Taluka, Jamnagar District of Gujarat state. The project consists of Nine micro 

watersheds with 5G1A8b2h, 5G1A8b2i, 5G1A8b2g, 5G1A8b2j, 5G1A8b2k, 5G1A8b2f, 5G1A5a2e 5G1A5c2j 5G1A5a2f as their respective codes. 

The total project area of the watershed is about 9271.69Ha, of which 7271.69Ha is proposed to be treated under Integrated Watershed 

Management Programme (IWMP). 

The nearest town is JamJodhpur which is about 15 Km from project area and well connected by pucca road .The Patan Project consists of 

four villages the detail information of all villages is mentioned in this report. Ahir, Darbar, Bharvad, Bramhin, Rabari, Gadhavi, Patel, 

Kori,Kumbhar and Harijan communities are the primary inhabitants of the projects. The livelihood of these people is primarily based on rainfed 

agriculture, wage labour, livestock, goat and sheep rearing. 

Table no. 1 : Basic project information 

Sr. 

Villages 

Area 

Total 

No. Name of 

Gram 

Area of proposed 

Taluka District 

project PIA 

the project Name Census code Panchayats 

the project to be 

cost 

treated 

1 

Patan 

2 

IWMP-I, 

Patan 

Paradava 

3 Amrapar 

100100078340000 

100100078360000 

100100078370000 

Patan 

3212.80 2712.79 

DCF 

Jam 

Paradava Jamnagar 1998.50 1498.52 1090.7535 Teritoriyal 

Jodhpur 

JAMNAGAR 

Amrapar 2779.40 2279.44 



4 Malvada 

100100078350000 

Malvada 1280.90 780.94 

Total 9271.69 7271.69 

Table no. 2 : Watershed information 

Name of the project No. of watersheds to be 

treated 

Watershed code 

IWMP-I Patan Nine 5G1A8b2h, 5G1A8b2i, 5G1A8b2g, 

5G1A8b2j, 5G1A8b2k, 5G1A8b2f, 

5G1A5a2e, 5G1A5c2j , 5G1A5a2f 

Watershed regime/type/order 

DDP 

Need of Watershed Development Programme 

Typically in our country, rain falls very intensely within few hours, within a few days, within a few months of every year. The number of 

rainy days does not average more than 40-50 in most part of the country. The challenge is to find ways of using this water where it falls. The aim of 

watershed development is to stop and conserve the rainfall where it falls, so that it can be used for longer period of time. The balanced ecosystem 

and human system are vital indicators of a sustainable environment and better quality of human life. In rural areas, livelihood and natural 

resources such as land, water, vegetation and livestock are inter-linked. India’s national economy is dependent on agriculture and the 

magnificence of its natural resources is legendary. As 70% of our cultivated land fall under the rain-fed areas, Watershed Management is one of 

the critical factors for improving agricultural production. The natural resource base on which existence of living beings depend-soil, water and 

vegetation is under degradation. Most of the arid and semi-arid regions have concentrations of eroded and degraded natural resources. Loss of 

vegetal cover, followed by soil degradation through erosion, has resulted in lands lacking in water as well as solid nutrients. 



Watershed Development Programme is selected on the basis of thirteen parameter namely Poverty Index, Percentage of SC/ST, Actual 

wages, Percentage of small and marginal farmers, Ground water status, Moisture Index, Area under rainfed agriculture, Drinking water situation 

in the area, Percentage of the degraded land, Productivity potential of the land, continuity of another watershed that has already 

developed/treated, Cluster Approach for hilly terrain. Based on these thirteen parameter a composite ranking was been given to Patan project as 

given in table no. 3. 

The total number of families under BPL is 574, which is less than 20 per cent of total households of the villages. Hence a score of 2.5 is 

allotted. The percentage of schedule castes in the village is about 10 per cent to the total population; hence a score of 5 is allotted. 

Rain fed agriculture forms the primary occupation of the village due to the fact that ground water is saline and hence unfit for usage. More 

than 60 per cent of the farmers are small and marginal by nature and the actual wages earned by the labour is less than the minimum wages hence 

a composite rank of 5, 3 and 5 are allotted respectively. 

Since the rainfall received is erratic and irregular, the moisture index is low and the area is classified under DDP block. Drinking water is 

problematic in the village. Majority of land is degraded due to inherent rainfall and due to no soil conservation structures in the project area. The 

soil is very permeable and production of the land can be significantly enriched with the availability of timely irrigation. 

Area proposed to be treated 

Table no. 3 : Weightage of the Project 

Project Project 

name type 


Weightage


IWMP I DDP i ii iii iv V vi vii viii ix X Xi xii xiii 

7.5 5 0 5 3 10 5 7.5 10 10 15 15 0 



Other projects/scheme running in the Project area: 

(1) MGNREGS: Bori Bandhoad-Patan, Metal Road,R.C.C Road-Paradava, Natha Meraman’s Farm To Javal Metal Road-Amrapar, Metal 

Road, Land Development,Levling-Malavada 

(2) WASMO: Water tanks,Pipe Line-Malavada. 

(3) Total Sanitation Campaign (TSC): Under progress no special work has been done. 

(4) Swarnjayanti Gram Swarozgar Yojana (SGSY )-Business Loan, Well Dipping Loan-Patan, Business Loan-Paradava, Business Loan- 

Amrapar, Business Loan-Malavada 

(5) Awas Yojana : (Total05 house has been constructed in the Patan project under various Awas Yojana) in which under Indira Awas 

Yojana Patan=60, Earth Quake = 19, Indira Awas Yojana Earth Quake = 20 and Sardar Awas Yojana = 6 



Table no.4: Developmental programmers running in the project area: 

Sr. 

No. 

Name of the 

programme/scheme 

Sponsoring agency 

Objectives of the 

programme/scheme 

Year of 

commencement 

Villages 

covered 

Estimated 

number of 

1 WASMO Govt of Gujarat Water supply 2007 4 454 beneficiaries 

2 NREGS Central Govt. Employment 2009 4 155 household 

3 IAY Central Govt. Housing 2005 4 105 House 

4 SGSY Central Govt. Woman empowerment 2004 4 254 

hold 

Table no. 5: Previous Watershed programmers in the project area: 

Sr. 

No. 

Project 

name 

Year 

started 

1 DDP 1999-2000 

2 Hariyali 2005-06 

3 Pre-Har 

yal il & 

1999-2000/ 

Hariyali 

4 Hariyali 2002-03, 

Name of 

village s 

Patan 

Paradava 

2006-07 Amrapar 

2006-07 

No. Of 

micro 

watershe 

d 

Watershe 

d codes 

Area 

under 

treatment 

Fundin 

g source 

Nodal 

agency 

PIA 

5G1B2a2e 500 ha govt DWDU Umiya 

Mataji 

5G1B1b2k 500 ha govt DWDU Umiya 

Mataji 

5G1B1b2d 1000 ha govt DWDU Umiya 

Mataji/Talu 

Total 

cost 

Expenditure 

incurred up 

to start of 

% 

financial 

completion 

% physical 

completion 

IWMP 

3000000 2800000 100 % 85 % 

2250000 2100000 100% 78% 

5250000 4200000 100% 85% 

ka 

Malvada 2 5G1B2a4n 500 ha govt DWDU GSLDC 

Panchayat 

3000000 2200000 100% 75% 



Discussion with Villagers 





CHAPTER - 2 

PROJECT IMPLEMENTING AGENCY 



Project Implementing Agency 

The Project Implementing Agency (PIA) is being selected by an appropriate mechanism by State Level Nodal Agency (SLNA). PIAs would be 

responsible for implementation of watershed project. These PIAs may include relevant line departments, autonomous organizations under State/ 

Central Governments, Government Institutes/ Research bodies, Intermediate Panchayats, Voluntary Organizations (VOs).The PIA of Patan 

watershed Project (IWMP-I ) is District Watershed Development Unit, Jamnagar 

District Watershed Development Unit, Jamnagar. 

The organization and its objectives: 

The District Watershed Development Unit (DWDU), Jamnagar is a district level nodal agency and was established on 13th May 2008 to oversee 

for the smooth implementation of watershed projects in the district. The District Development Officer (DDO) is the chairman of the DWDU. The 

DWDU have dedicated and experience staffs comprising one Project Manager (deputation from Gujarat Forest Department) a Technical Expert 

(on contract basis) and multidisciplinary team of agriculture expert, community mobilization expert, Civil engineer, MIS coordinator, system 

analyst, surveyor, accountant and computer operator are recruited. The DWDU Jamnagar has its own rented office at Sardar Patel Bhavan, Near 

Rameshwar Mandir, Jamnagar . 

The objective of the DWDU Jamnagar are supervising, planning, implementing, documenting and promoting watershed development projects 

and related development activities in the district. Moreover, the DWDU Jamnagar will work as a PIA for some IWMP projects. 



Programmes/projects running in the district 

At present six IWMP projects have been sanctioned by Government of India for the Jamnagar district. The entry point activities of all the six 

IWMP projects have identified by the respective PIAs in the district. Jamnagar Forest Division as PIA for the four projects (IWMP-1, 2, 4 & 6) 

and DWDU-self is as PIA for the two projects (IWMP-3 & 5). 

Apart from the running six IWMP projects, total 614 pre-Hariyali & Hariyali projects (DDP,State watershed, EAS, IWDP) has been sanctioned 

and out of that 126 projects are completed and 488 projects are still running in the district. The DWDU Jamnagar is also monitoring a central 

government sponsored scheme on "Artificial Recharge of Groundwater through Dugwells" in the district. 

SWOT Analysis of the DWDU: 

Strength: 

(1) Dedicated and fully experience staffs and multidisciplinary team with required qualification 

(2) Independent District Level Nodal Agency with separate office. 

(3) Strong linkages with national and state level institutions, agricultural universities, and NGOs for capacity building and technical guidance 

(4) Scientific planning in watershed projects with the help of BISAG, Gandhinagar 

(5) District level monitoring, coordination & Cooperation Committee 

(6) Well establishment of PRIs for social audits 



Weakness: 

(1) Insufficient funds for complete watershed projects per hectare. 

(2) No permanent staff i.e. contractual staff 

(3) No permanent office building. 

Opportunities: 

(1) Sustainable livelihood generation landless and asset less. 

(2) Improvement of socio-economic status of poors 

(3) Awarness generation among the illiterates through IEC activities by usage of new ICT activities. 

(4) Reduction of migration rate. 

(5) Usage of new technologies of watershed modeling and GPS for monitoring the watershed activities. 

(6) Continuous learning 

Threats: 

(1) Political interference in implementation of programme. 

(2) Delay of releasing project fund from the higher authority 

(3) Lack of contribution and cooperation from local peoples. 

(4) Low and erratic rainfall in the project area. 

(5) Low literacy rate in the project area. 



Table no. 6: PIA: 

Sr. No. Names of project Details of PIA 

(i) Type of organization District Level Nodal Agency 

1 IWMP-I Patan Project 

(ii) Name of organization 

(iii) Address 

(iv) Telephon 

0288-2553026 

[ii) (v) Name Fax of organization 

0288- 

(iii) (vi) Designation E-mail & Address 

(ivj Telephone 

(v) Fax 

(vi) E-mail 

Table no. 7: Staff at PIA level: 

Deputy Conservator of Forest ,Territorial, Jamnagar 

Ganjivada,Nagnath gate,Jamnagar 

Sr. 

Monthly 

Name Age Sex Designation Qualification Experience Job assigned 

No. 

remuneration 

B.Sc. (Agri) & 

1 S.M Paramar 54 M Project Manager Diploma Forestry 25 Project Management 47,000 

(GFS) 

2 C.V. Band 25 M Technical Expert M.Tech. 1 

Monitoring & To 

Assist in Project 25000 

Management 

3 J. H. Parmar 33 M MDT Eng DCE 4 

Physical works 

supervision and 

report 

15000 



4 M.V. Khirsariya 32 F MDT Co. MRS 4 

5 K.L.Ahir 27 M MDT Agri. MRS 2 

6 A.V. Vaghera 23 M MDT Account MBA 

2 Year, 3 

Months 

SHG and social 

awareness 

15000 

programmes 

Agriculture activities 

supervision & 

9000 

Motivation 

Programmes 

Account 8000 

7 S. D. Chandra 25 M MDT DEO M.A., B.Ed. 5 Maintain Data Sell 6000 

8 M.L. Sonagara 25 M WDT Eng. DCE 2 

9 R.R. Vala 26 M WDT Agri. BRS 3 

Physical works 

supervision and 

report 

Agriculture activities 

supervision & 

Motivation 

Programmes 

8000 

8000 



10 U.A Rabadiya 23 F WDT Co. B.A. 6 Month 

SHG and social 

awareness 

8000 

programmes 

11 A.I. Paramar 28 M WDT Account B.Com. 8 Account 7000 

12 R.A.Tank 19 M WDT Surveyor Surveyor 2 Surveying 6000 

13 K.J. Makwana 30 M WDT D.E.O. B. Com D.C.S. 8 Computer Operator 5000 



CHAPTER - 3 

Basic Information of Project Area 



3.1 Basic Information of Project Area 

Project area is located in the district of Jamnagar about 105 Kms. from district headquarters. The project area is characterized by high 

temperature and low varying rainfall. The proposed watershed project has a land area of 9271.69 ha of which 7271.69 ha will be treated. The 

villages are characterized by undulating land, rocky strata with varying slopes. The drainage density is high and there is excessive runoff of water 

causing high soil erosion. The soil and underground water is highly saline which results in acute shortage of drinking water. People have to 

commute around 0.5-1 km to fetch drinking water from panchayat water supply 

3.1.1 Land use pattern: 

The net geographical area of Patan Project is about 9271.69 Ha and there is forest area 233.35 ha. Total land under agriculture use is 33.72 % 

which is 7271.69 Ha. And out of agriculture 66.28 % is under rain fed. 

Table no. 8: Land use pattern: 

Sr. No. 

Names of 

villages 


Geographical Area 

of the village 

Forest 

Area 

Land under 

agricultural use 

Rainfed 

area 

Perm-anent 

pastu-res 

Cultivable 

Wasteland 

Non-cultivable 

1 Patan 3212.80 0 1030.80 1078 0 98.0 2084 

2 Paradava 1998.50 0 697 788.10 0 152.1 1149.5 

3 Amrapar 2779.40 0 1378.40 1804.40 0 654 747 

4 Malvada 1280.90 39.4 91.90 267.90 0 182 967.60 

3.1.2 Soil and topography: 

Total 9271.6 39.4 3198.10 3938.4 0 1086.1 4948.1 

Patan project falls under North Saurashtra of Gujarat agro climatic zone. The soil is shallow medium black. The soil is brown to very dark grayish


brown in surface colour.The depth of soil is moderate to medium deep about 45 to 100 cm. The predominant texture of soil is silt and clay. The 

fertility of soil is moderately poor with low nitrogen, phosphorus and potash. The topography of the area is moderate ranging from 4-10 % slope. 

Table no. 9: Soil type and topography: 

Sr. No. 

Name of the Agro-climatic 

zone covers project area 

Area in ha 

Names of the 

villages 

a)Type 

Major soil types 

b) Area in ha 

Topography 

1 

2 

North Saurashtra 

3212.80 

1998.50 

Patan 

Paradava 

3 

2779.40 Amrapar 

4 

1280.90 Malvada 

Total 

9271.6 

Yellow Moorum 

and soft rock and 

3212.80 

Medium Black 

Yellow Moorum 1998.50 

Yellow Moorum 

and soft rock 

Yellow Moorum 

and hard rock 

2779.40 

1280.90 

9271.6 

Moderate hilly 

region and 

undulating flat 

area 



Table no. 10: Flood and drought condition: 

Sr. 

Village Flood (Incidence) Drought (Incidence) 

1 

No. 

Patan Nil Once in 3 Years 

2 Paradava Nil Once in 3 Years 

3 Amrapar Nil Once in 3 Years 

4 Malvada Nil Once in 3 Years 

Table no. 11: Soil Erosion 

Cause Type of erosion Area affected (ha) Run off (mm/ year) Average soil loss (Tonnes/ 

Water erosion 

a Sheet 2036.07 

b Rill 1163.47 

c Gully 1628.86 

d Ravenous 

Sub-Total 4828.40 

Wind erosion 0 NA 

Total 4828.40 

Table no. 12: Climatic condition 


30-40% 

ha/ year) 

Sr. No. Year Rainfall (in mm) Temperature (°C) Highest intensity of Rainfall 

(mm in a day) 

Max. 

Min. 

1 1999 321 42 31 32 

2 2000 368 43 29 69 

3 2001 616 45 30 95 

4 2002 215 42 31 34 

Max. 

5 2003 601 43 32 90 

6 2004 543 41 29 71


7 2005 616 44 28 105 

8 2006 655 43 29 109 

9 2007 1061 42 30 142 

10 2008 641 45 37 120 

Table no. 13: Physiographic and relief 

Village name Elevation Slope range (%) Major streams 

Patan 4-10% Small & Big streams like nala,Gala Valo Stream 

Paradava 4-10% Ubera Valo Stream,Tekari Stream 

Amrapar 2-7% Malar Stream,Shell Stream 

Malvada 4-10% Gandya pir Strream,Sumiya Dhuna Stream 

3.1.3 Land and Agriculture 

55 percent of the total area is dependent on rainfall. The rainfall is highly scanty which has resulted in recurrent phenomenon of drought two to 

three years. The average rainfall of this area is about 563.7 mm (from past ten year data) with a highest intensity of 86.7 mm (in a day). This 

uneven distribution is leading to runoff of soil every year to the streams and rivulets. 

Lack of surface water source and high salinity of ground water has decreased sufficient base for irrigation as well as for drinking purpose. The 

average land holding is about 2.5 ha of which the land holding is ranging from 1 to 4 Ha. Lack of irrigation source forces the majority of these 

farmers to migrate to ensure their livelihood. This affects directly the demographic profile of the village. The major crops cultivated by the 

farmers are cotton, groundnut and Bajra (Pearl millet) in the village. Some of the farmers take up rainfed castor if the rains are good. The land 

conservation measures such as farm pond, earthen bunds and farm bunds in the area will help them to take up a rabi crop of mustard or cumin 

and vegetables in the residual moisture. 



Table no. 14: Land ownership details 

Sr. No. Village Total owned land (Ha) HH giving 

HH taking 

Gen OBC SC 

ST 

land on lease land on lease 

1 

Patan 35.80 977.40 9.64 2.92 25.12 77.31 

ST 

2 Paradava 191.72 567.90 16.12 0 46.20 27.31 

3 Amrapar 116.96 1881.32 others 8.32 0 16.23 9.12 

4 Malvada 0 256.32 17.58 0 0 0 

Table no. 15: Agriculture 

Sr. No. Village 

Net sown area 

1 

One time Two times Three times 

2 Patan 1078 101.60 40.64 

3 Paradava 788.10 122.0 36.60 

4 Amrapar 1804.40 456.0 182.40 

Malvada 267.90 12.20 4.88 

Table no. 16: Irrigation 

Sr. 

No. 

Village Source 1 : Canal Source 2 : Check dam / Pond Source 3 : Well/Bore 

Availability 

months 

Net area Gross area Availability 

months 

Net area Gross area Availabilit 

y months 

Net area 

1 Patan NA NA NA NA NA NA 8 101.60 142.24 

2 Paradava NA NA NA NA NA NA 8 122.0 158.6 

3 Amrapar NA NA NA NA NA NA 8 456.0 638.4 

4 Malvada NA NA NA NA NA NA 8 12.20 17.08 

Gross 

area 



3.1.4 Livestock 

The project area has about 1211 cows and 3107 buffalos out of which majority are of local breed, there are 796 bullock, 582 goats and 608 sheeps. 

Majority of Rabari and Bharwad community depends on goat and sheep rearing for their livelihood. Lack of rain and surface water has reduced 

the fodder and pasture area for their animals. This leads to heavy migration to other parts of the state with their herds of goats and sheep. The 

productivity of the dairy animals is so low that there is no dairy cooperative in the village. 

Table no. 18: Livestock 

Sr. 

No. 

Village Buffalo Cow Total Milk 

(Buffalo+Cow 

Goat Sheep Bullock Calf Others 

No milk No Milk ] 

No. Milk No milk No. No. 

1 Patan 1134 204120 774 92880 297000 130 7800 39 1950 256 424 2 

2 Paradav 250 45000 151 18120 63120 301 18600 423 21150 174 129 0 

3 Amrapar a 386 69480 114 10260 79740 75 4500 144 7200 271 251 1 

4 Malvada 1337 240660 172 20640 261300 76 4560 2 120 95 339 0 

Total 3107 559260 1211 141900 701160 582 35460 608 30420 796 1143 3 

Table no 19. Drinking water 

Sr. 

No. 

Village Ground water table (mt) Source of drinking water Availability in months Quality 

Patan 

Portable 

Paradava 25 to 35 mt Well, Bore 8 to 12 

Portable 

Amrapar 

Portable 

Malvada 

Portable 

3.2 Socio-Economic Profile 



3.2.1 Demographic Status: Patan watershed project mainly covers four villages which as total 1169 household with a net population (as per 

base-line survey) with3371 males and 2900 female .The sex ratio is about 913 females to 1000 males. There are about 96 BPL families. The average 

family size is of five members. The literacy rate is average about 170 per cent with male literacy rate of 198 per cent and a female literacy rate as 

low as149 per cent .The major castes in the villages are Ahir, Maher, Patel, Darbar, Bharvads Rabari, Brahmin and harijan. Majority of 

population is involved in agriculture and animal husbandry. 

Table no. 21: Demographic information 

Sr. 

No. 

Village Population SC ST 

Patan 

Total Male Female Total Male Female % Total Male Female % 

2561 1342 1219 270 141 129 9.48 66 34 22 2.57 

Paradava 1203 654 549 90 49 41 13.91 0 0 0 0 

Amrapar 2006 1099 907 210 115 95 9.55 0 0 0 0 

Malvada 501 276 225 10 6 4 2 10 5 5 2 

Total 6271 3371 2900 580 311 269 34.94 76 39 27 4.57 

Table no. 22: Literacy rate 

Sr. No. Village Literacy Literacy % above Literacy % below 

Total % Male % Female % age 14 

age 14 

Patan 950 37.09 543 40.46 407 33.39 56.52 43.48 

Paradava Total 658 54.69 388 59.32 270 49.18 65.65 34.35 

Amrapar 1200 59.82 714 64.97 486 53.58 70.33 29.67 

Malvada 92 18.36 62 33.33 30 13.33 69.42 30.58 

Total 2900 42.49 1707 49.52 1193 37.37 261.92 138.08 

Migration Pattern: Migrate during summer season to various parts of the state like Gandhidam, Surat, Bhuj Junagadh and Suarashtra as daily 



wages agricultural labours and construction workers. Lack of fodder availability and grazing land for smaller ruminant also forces these farmers 

to migrate to other places. 

Table no. 23: Migration details 


Patan 

Paradava 

Amrapar 

Malvada 

Table no. 24: Poverty 

Sr. 

No. 

Total 

Migration Migration by months Main reason Income 

population 

2561 

Total 

896 

Male 

627 

Female 

269 

Up to 3 

months 

180 

3-6 months 

358 

More than 6 

months 

358 

for migration 

For Better 

during 

migration / 

Rs 4500/month 

month 

1203 275 192 83 55 82 138 

Employment 

and low 

Rs 4800/month 

2006 100 70 30 20 30 50 

productiviy of Rs 4750/month 

501 60 42 18 15 15 30 land Rs 3800/month 

Total 6271 1331 931 400 270 485 576 

Village Total Household BPL %of BPLHH Total Land less HH % of land less HH 

0-16 16-20 Total 

1 Patan 449 262 104 366 81.51 264 58.80 

2 Paradava 238 27 49 76 31.93 93 39.06 

3 Amrapar 397 35 10 45 11.33 147 37.03 

4 

85 0-16 27 15 42 49.41 44 51.76 

Malvada 

Total 1169 96 96 548 

Table no. 25: Village infrastructure 

Sr. Village Pucca Schools Colleges Post Office Banks Distance Milk Milk Other Any other 



No. 

road to 

the 

village 

LP UP HS (Number) (Distance) (Number) from 

nearest 

market 

collection 

1 Patan (Y/N) Y Y N N 0 0 0 yard 10 1 0 0 0 

2 Paradav Y Y N N 0 0 0 35 0 0 0 0 

a 

3 Amrapa 

r 

4 

Malvada 

centre 

(Number) 

cooperative 

(Number) 

cooperatives 

/CBIs 

(Number) 

institution 

Y Y Y N 0 0 0 20 1 0 0 0 

Y Y N N 0 12 0 15 0 0 0 0 

Infrastructure facilities: : Patan watershed is well connected with Taluka with pucca roads. The village has electricity connecting under 

Jyothigram yogana of Gujarat government. Nearly 75 per cent of households in the village have their personal electric meters. Since ground water 

is highly saline electicity is not used for agricultural purpose. Patan, Paradava, Amarapar and Malavada villages have primary schools with all 

facilities like electricity, water facilities, computers etc. For further study like middle and higher secondary education Patan and Malavada village 

students have to go to Taluka level at Jamjodhpur which is about 14 kilometers away. While Paradva and Amarapar village students have to go to 

nearest village at Mervadar for further study which is about 10 kilometers away. This is yet another reason for lower education level of the people. 

The villages do not have a Primary Health Centre for which Patan and Malavada villagers have to go to Taluka level at Jamjodhpur which is 

about 14 kilometers away. While Paradva villagers have to go to Khagasri village which is about 12 kilometers away. And Amarapar villagers 

have to go to Mervadar village which is about 10 kilometers away. There is no proper state transport facility to the village as there is only a bus 

while rest of the village travels by a local vehicle called Chakda in emergency situation or elce their own vehicles. 

Table no. 26 : Facilities / HH assets 

Sr. Village HHs with HHs with HHs with phones HHs with vehicle HHs with HHs with HHs with HHs with 



No. electricity safety 

Land line 

Mobile 2 -wheeler 4- wheeler TV set cooking gas Drinking 

1 Patan 428 

latrines 

5 0 426 25 0 8 0 

water 

34 0 

2 Paradava 225 18 0 226 42 0 41 0 139 2 

3 Amarapar 397 53 0 394 108 13 81 0 207 8 

4 Malavada 66 0 0 

Land line 

48 16 0 3 0 8 0 

Livelihood pattern: The villagers earn their livelihood from animal husbandry and agriculture. And during lean seasons they go as daily wage 

labourers in stone cutting and in farmers. 

freedge 

Table no. 27: Income 

Sr no Village Agriculture Animal husbandry Casual labour Others Total 

1 

Patan 9075302 4909700 41351000 312000 55648002 

2 

Paradava 12456836 446000 2221000 425000 15548836 

3 

Amarapar 23793600 716000 2780000 1502500 28792100 

4 

Malavada 704500 2632800 173500 0 3510800 

Table no.28: Dependence on Forest/CPR 


Charcoal making 

Fodder 

% sells Income (Rs) % sells Income 

Total income (Rs) 

1 Patan 0 0 0 0 0 

2 Paradava 0 0 0 0 0 



3 Amarapar 0 0 0 0 0 

4 Malavada 0 0 0 0 0 

Table no. 29: Livelihood pattern (Occupational distribution) 

Animal 

Sr. 

Total 

Agriculture Casual 

Salt Pan 

Village 

Agriculture husbandry 

Services Handicraft 

No. 

workforce 

+ AH labour 

Labours 

(AH) 

1 Patan 1525 678 253 78 569 36 15 0 

2 Paradava 772 453 42 63 261 18 9 0 

3 Amarapar 1335 847 14 73 356 15 2 0 

4 Malavada 354 169 133 99 51 0 5 0 

Comparative data of the crop productivity of the area: project area vs. District vs. State vs. Country vs. world 

Introduction: 

The purpose of this study is to provide a comparative analysis of productivity of Patan project area with reference to world, India, Gujarat, 

Jamnagar district Jamjodhpur taluka. "The term productivity in general means the total output per unit of factor input. For example land 

productivity means output per hectare of land. Productivity is an average and is calculated by dividing the total output of a particular crop 

by the total cultivated area under that crop." 

Data are made available by the Baseline survey (project area), Handbook of Agriculture, ICAR publication 2006(For 

Gujarat and India), and Final district plan (DAP) of Dept. of Agriculture (for Jamnagar). The results indicate that project area has very 

low productivity compared to world, India, Gujarat and Jamnagar. The productivity is low not only because that the land is 



unproductive or the farmer’s lack the skills to manage their crop but also due lack to of source of irrigation and scarcity of rain. The 

world productivity of groundnut is 1550 kg/ha. In India it is grown in about 8 million hectors with production of 8.06 million ton and 

productivity of 1032 kg/ha. Gujarat alone produces 39% of total groundnut of our country from 25% of the area with a productivity of 

about 1561 kg/ha. As compare to Gujarat and India, Jamnagar district has comparatively good productivity1625 kg/ha. The Patan 

project area has only 1275 kg/ha productivity. It is very low compare to district, state, India and World. 



Ground Nut Productivity Kg/Ha 

2000 

1500 

1000 

1550 

1032 

1561 1625 

1275 

World 

India 

Gujarat 

Jamnagar 

Patan 

500 

0 

World India Gujarat Jamnagar Patan 

The cultivation of cotton & its manufactures into textiles has been practiced in India since pre historic times. India ranks 1 st in area and 4 th in 

production. The world productivity of lint cotton is 700 kg/ha. India grows cotton in 9.5 million hectors with production of 5.2 million tons and 

productivity of 503 kg/ha. Gujarat has 2.51 million hectors area under cotton, which produces 1.87 million tons of cotton with productivity of 746 

kg/ha. As compared to India & Gujarat, Jamnagar district has good productivity 750 kg/ha. But the Patan project area has only 520 kg/ha. 

productivity. 



Cotton Productivity Kg/Ha 

800 

700 

600 

500 

400 

300 

200 

100 

0 

746 750 

700 

503 

520 

World India Gujarat Jamnagar Patan 

World 

India 

Gujarat 

Jamnagar 

Patan 

The Patan project area has low productivity because of the following reasons: 

i) Full dependence on monsoon: 

Patan village is dependent on monsoon. Water is essential input in agriculture. Due to the absence of proper irrigation facility, 80% of the 

total cultivated area depends on the uncertain monsoon. Therefore, the suceess or failure of the monsoon determines the success or failure 

of agriculture production.The rainfall is unreliable due to two factors: untimely and inadequate. 

ii) 

Low use of fertilizer per unit cropped area: 

Farmers do not use sufficient fertilizer due to lack of water, scarcity of fertilizer in market and insufficient money for fertilizer. Many a 

times they don’t get fertilizer at the right time. 

iii) 

Traditional farming methods: 

This also leads to low productivity. There is a lot of ignorance about the use of new farming methods and technologies such as multiple 



cropping. They don’t use FYM and other input in a proper way; that is why they don’t get 100% output. So these factors contribute to low 

productivity. 

iv) Lack of adequate farm machinery: 

Even today a large number of farmers in Patan use wooden ploughs and bullocks. They don’t have adequate machinery like seed drill. So, 

old machineries take more time in tillage practices. 

v) Lack of finances for farmers: 

In Patan most of the farmers are marginal and small. They do not have enough money to buy good quality seeds, machinery and other 

inputs. 

vi) Lack of good quality seeds and fertilizers: 

Good quality seed, fertilizer and pesticide are important factor in agriculture productivity. The use of good quality leads to higher land 

productivity. In Patan, however, there are two limitations in the use of fertilizer. First these fertilizers are most useful in irrigated condition. 

But in Patan 80 per cent of land depend on rainfall. In Patan mostly farmers use nitrogenous fertilizers especially urea. This has resulted in 

disproportionate use of fertilizer depleting the quality of land. 

vii) Lack of other facilities such as storage and marketing: 

5-10% of agriculture product damage after harvesting due to scarcity of proper storage and proper market for sale. So he sells to local 

traders at the low prices. Farmers mainly face proper means of transportation and roads. And second problem is farmers don’t have 

proper storage facilities. 



CHAPTER - 4 

WATERSHED ACTIVITIES 



Watershed Activities 

Watershed management as a strategy has been adapted by Government of India especially in the rainfed regions of semi-arid tropics. These 

regions are characterized by low and undependable rain, low soil fertility, poor infrastructure development, low literacy and high incidence of 

migration. The inheriting low fertility of crops results in high productivity of crops which have a very low biological efficiency. 

Several studies have identified that there is a dire need of a systematic and scientific approach to deal with watershed development. The common 

guidelines generate a fresh and flexible framework for the next generation watershed development. 

4.1 Scientific Planning: 

1. Cluster Approach 

This envisages a broader vision of Geo-hydrological unit which involves treating a cluster of micro-watershed. The Patan Project consists of three 

micro- watersheds namely 5G1A8b2h, 5G1A8b2i, 5G1A8b2g, 5G1A8b2j, 5G1A8b2k, 5G1A8b2f, 5G1A5a2e 5G1A5c2j 5G1A5a2f as their 

respective codes. Further Patan watershed project is in continuation with other watershed project namely Vansjaliya Project this gives an element 

of continuation of the programme. 

2. Base line Survey 

To access the impact of any watershed development programme a detailed baseline survey has to be conducted. This acts a benchmark for any 

intervention during and post implementation of any development programme. A detailed baseline survey has been undertaken which involved 

household census survey, Bio-physical survey and Village level data collection from Talati -cum mantri. Household census survey includes a 

detailed questionnaire which has been filled by visiting each and every house-hold in the village. This provide the details of the demographic 

profile of the village, the literacy percentage, SC/ST population, number of BPL household, cattle population, net consumption rate in the village, 

average milk production of the cattle, social and economic condition of villagers and various schemes running and their benefits. 

Bio-physical survey has been undertaken to identify various natural resources available in the village. It included the soil typology, well in the area, 

crop taken in the field, Cropping pattern, fertilizer used and various sources of irrigation in the field. 

3. Participatory Rural Appraisal (PRA) 



The PRA tools like Focussed Group Discussion (FGD) were used to gather information from rural areas where watershed programme is going to 

be implemented. The past experience of watershed has given tremendous input to focus on creating accountability of the stakeholders towards the 

programme. This has created an emphasis to include all the stakeholder communities and their local and Indigenous Technological Knowledge 

(ITK) while planning for any activity. Participatory approach provides a new path for planning, implementing, monitoring and post- withdrawal 

activities with a complete accountability of the stakeholders. This decreases the efforts of the ground staff i.e WDT members and involves more of 

villagers as implementers. Various PRA techniques like resource mapping, social mapping, season calendars were used to understand the physical 

and social orientation of the village in general and watershed in specific. These tools put the villagers in ease than the complicated questionnaires. 

Various tools like Matrix ranking, Venn diagram were used to identify various local vegetations (apt for afforestation), Fodders crops, various 

institutions and their significance in the life of the farmers. 

4. Use of GIS and Remote sensing for planning 

Use of various high science tools has been promoted at various stages of watershed development. 

a) Prioritization 

Geographical Information System (GIS) has been used for prioritization process. Various layer maps were created like Geo-morphological, Soil, 

BPL Population, SC/ST population, Ground water Status, Drinking water situation Slope percent. These were all given proper weightages 

according to the DoLR specification. This helped in prioritization of various watershed areas. 

b) Planning 



A action plan matrix was been formulated by State Level Nodal Agency (SLNA) taking into account various features like the slope percent, soil 

Depth, Soil Texture, Soil erosion in the area for wasteland, forest land and agricultural land. 

Global positioning System (GPS) was used to identify each and every water conservation structures available in the project area. This will be used 

to create a map. Contour Map of vertical interval of 1 meter at a scale of 1:8000 was used for identifying various location specific for soil and water 

conservation structures. 

c) Hydrological modelling 

Hydrology modeling technique was been used for locating drainage, stream length, flow direction, sink, Flow accumulation. This model overlaid 

over cadastral map hel to calculate the catchments area of each structures like the check dam etc. This has helped to remove the human error 

which generally occurring while calculating the catchments area of a check dam. 

Table no. 30: Details of Scientific Planning and Inputs in IWMP projects 



Sr. 

Scientific criteria/ inputs used 

No. 

1 (A) Planning 

Cluster approach 

Whether technical back-stopping for the project has been arranged? If yes, mention the name of the 

Institute Baseline survey 

Yes 

Hydro-geological survey 

Yes 

Contour mapping 

Yes 

Participatory Net Planning (PNP) 

Yes 

Remote sensing data-especially soil/ crop/ run-off cover 

Ridge to Valley treatment 

Yes 

Online IT connectivity between 

[1] Project and DRDAcell/ZP Yes 

[2] DRDA and SLNA Yes 

[3] SLNA and DoLR Yes 

Availability of CIS layers 

1. Cadastral map 

2. Village boundaries Yes 

3. Drainage Yes 

4; Soil (Soil nutrient status) Yes 

5. Land use Yes 

6. Ground water status Yes 

7. Watershed boundaries Yes 

8. Activity Yes 

Crop simulation models* 

Integrated coupled analyzer/ near infrared visible spectroscopy/ medium spectroscopy for high speed 

soil nutrient analysis 

Normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI)# 

Weather Station 

(B) Inputs 

1. Bio-pesticides Yes 


Whether scientific criteria was used 

Yes 

Yes


2. Organic manures Yes 

3. Vermicompost Yes 

4. Bio-fertilizer Yes 

5. Water saving devices No 

6. Mechanized tools/ implements No 

7. Bio-fencing No 

8. Nutrient budgeting No 

9. Automatic water level recorders & sediment samplers No 

Any other (please specify) 

4.2 Institution Building 

1. Watershed Committee (WC) 

It is a committee that is constituted by Gram Sabha to implement the watershed project with technical support of WDT in the village. This 

committee was registered under society Registration Act 1860. The Gram sabha of the village selects the chairman of the watershed committee 

with the secretary who will be a paid functionary. A watershed Committee was formed accordingly in Patan Project. Capacity building training to 

the watershed committee was given by WDT member. 

The watershed committee has a pivotal during various processes like the PRA and over planning of various points. 

Table no. 31: Watershed Committee details (PATAN) 

Sl. 

N 

o. 


WC 

Date of 

Registrat 

ion as a 

Society 

(dd/mm/ 

yyyy) 

Name 

Designati 

on 

M/F 

S 

C 

ST SF MF 

L 

F 

Land 

-less 

U 

G 

SH 

G 

G 

P 

Educational 

qualification 

Function/s 

assigned 



Rajabhai Maldebhai 

Odedara 

President M Y Y Y 4 

Mangabhai 

Vasharambbhai 

Ludariya 

Vice 

President 

M Y 2 

Ranmalbhai Kanabhai 

Parmar 

Secretary M Y 12 

Ramuben Karabhai 

Ludariya 

Member F Y Y - 

1 

Watershed 

committee 

Patan 

Under 

progress 

Menaben Jerambhai 

Parmar 

Hiriben Savdashbhai 

Odedara 


Member F Y - 

Murubhai Mangabhai 

Vinjuda 

Member M Y 2 - 

Virambhai Nagabhai 

Paramar 

Member M Y 2 - 

Karabhai Karanabhai 

Odedara 

Member M Y 2 

Karabhai Devabhai 

Taliya 

Member M Y 4 

Indubha Bhavansang 

Sodha 

Member M Y 3 

Table no. 31.1Watershed Committee details (PARADAVA) 

Sl. 

N 

o. 


WC 


Registrat 

ion as a 

Name 

Designati 

on 

M/F 

S 

C 

ST SF MF 

L 

F 

Land 

-less 

U 

G 

SH 

G 

G 

P 

Educational 

qualifi- 

Function/s 

assigned 



Society 

(dd/mm/ 

yyyy) 

Ramdebhai Virambhai 

Odedara 

cation 

President M Y Y - 

Bhanubhai Bhimabhai 

Pata 

Vice 

President 

M Y B.com 

Vallbhbhai Chhaganbhai 

Khant 

Secretary M Y 12 

Rambhai Rudabhai 

Vinzuda 

Member M Y Y - 

Jila Dana Ranavadiya Member M Y Y - 

2 

Watershed 

committee 

Paradava 

Under 

progress 

Champaben Prbhudash 

Khant 

Sajanaben Devabbhai 

Paramar 

Member F Y 4 

Member F Y 

Hiriben Nathalal 

Odedara 

Member F Y Y 

Kanabhai Bhimabhai 

Khunti 

Member M Y 10 

Nrendrabhai Vithalbhai 

Khant 

Member M Y 4 

Sanjaybhai Hajabhai 

Odedara 

Member M Y 12 



Table no. 31.2Watershed Committee details (AMRAPAR) 

Sl. 

N 

o. 


WC 


Registrat 

ion as a 

Society 

(dd/mm/ 

yyyy) 

Name 

Designati 

on 

M/F 

S 

C 

ST SF MF 

L 

F 

Land 

-less 

Devabhai Jethabhai Jogal President M Y Y 7 

U 

G 

SH 

G 

G 

P 

Educational 

qualification 

Function/s 

assigned 

Keshubhai Samatbhai 

Modhavadiya 

Vice 

President 

M Y 4 

Nagabhai Nathabhai 

Khunti 

Secretary M Y - 

Nurjaha Karimbhai 

Patta 

Member F Y Y 

3 

Watershed 

committee 

Amrapar 

Under 

progress 

Valiben Devabhai 

Karavadra 


Liriben Jivabhai Khunti Member F Y - 

Murubhai Khimabhai 

Rathod 

Member M Y - 

Bhanubhai Chhaganbhai 

Makvana 


Rajeshbhai Bhagavanji 

Peshivadiya 


Murubhai Jashabhai 

Modhavadiya 

Member M Y 

Kanabhai Bhimabhai 

Khunti 

Member M Y 



Table no. 31.3atershed Committee details (MALAVADA) 

Sl. 

N 

o. 


WC 


Registrat 

ion as a 

Society 

(dd/mm/ 

yyyy) 

Name 

Jivabhai Karanabhai 

Bharai 

Designati 

on 

M/F 

S 

C 

ST SF MF 

L 

F 

Land 

-less 

U 

G 

SH 

G 

G 

P 

Educational 

qualification 

President M Y Y 4 

Function/ 

s assigned 

Zinabhai Hamirbhai 

Bharai 

Vice 

President 

M Y Y - 

Rajubhai Batukbhai 

Bharai 

Secretary M Y 

Panchabhai Nathabhai 

Bharai 

Member M Y 3 

4 

Watershed 

committee 

Malavada 

Under 

progress 

Bhojabhai Amrabhai 

Vaish 

Rudabhai Hamirbhai 

Bhint 

Member M Y - 


Mendbhai Palabhai 

Khaniya 


Hiriben Polabhai 

Khaniya 

Member F Y Y Y - 

Unjiben Chanabhai 

Khaniya 

Member F Y Y Y - 

Bhupatbhai Fogabhai 

Bharai 

Member M Y 3 

Karmanbhai Hamirabhai Member M Y - 



Bhint 

2. Self Help Group 

Self Help Groups are motivated, small homogenous group organized together through highly successful of credit and thrift activities. Self help 

group initiative especially for women help to uplift their livelihood. Generally self help group includes landless and marginal sized farm women, 

BPL household, SC/ST women. 

SHG initiative in Vinjalpar project was being organized by having a focused group discussion between various homogenous communities of 

women based on their livelihood separately. Each group discussed their basic problems with their facilitators. The major problems identified are: 

a) Lack of proper credit facilities due to low intervention of formal financial credit instititutes. 

b) Excessive exploitation of weaker section by money lenders 

c) Lack of attitude of saving among poor people due to complex and rigid conventional financial institution structures. 

d) Lack of small micro-loans without collaterals and high interest rates. 

e) Lack of knowledge on credit, Thrift activity and banking. 

f ) Less knowledge of record keeping due to lack of guidance and training 

g) There is no specific goal and vigion 

With a view point of these problems it was planned to organize these women into a group consisting of 12 to 20 in each groups and it was also 

proposed to have 8 groups. 

With a detailed discussion with some of the local NGOs working in the area like SEW A, it was planned to have some capacity building training 

regarding SHG activities. It was also proposed to have some livelihood activities which will promote women empowerment this included spices 

packing, embroidery activities with forward and backward linkage. This will ultimately lead into better human development in the village. 



Table no. 32: SHG detail 

Sr. No. Total no. of registered SHGs No. of members No. of SC/ST in each 

category 

No. of BPL in each 

category 

With With only With Total Categories M F Total M F Total M F Total 

only 

Men 

Women both 

(i) Landless 102 17 119 3 0 3 74 10 84 

19 3 1 23 

(ii) MF 5 1 6 0 0 0 6 2 8 

(iii) SF 48 5 53 0 0 0 15 2 17 

n (iv) SF LF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

Total 19 3 1 23 155 23 178 3 0 3 95 14 109 

3. User Group: 


(in) MF 

(iv) LF 

These are homogeneous groups of persons having landholding within the watershed area. They are normally formed to manage an activity or asset 

on a long .term basis. The user group collect user charges from their members. Some of the points which were considered while forming a user 

group in Patan were : 

1) In case of a checkdam all the beneficiaries of the individual check dam where involved as user group members. 

2] In case of Fodder bank all the individual beneficiaries of animal husbandry are considered as potential members. 

3) Membership was on voluntary and democratic. 

Focused group discussion was conducted to between the user groups to discuss the above conditions and to select potentia members. It was 

advocated that each group to formulate certain internal rules and have a feeling of ownership with community spirit.


Table No. 33 The following types of groups were planned to be formed in Patan Project 

S. No Name of User Group Major Task 

1 Potato Wafers Production Group Production of Potato Wafers. 

2 Chilly Powder Packing Group Production of Chilly Powder. 

3 Paper Dish Group Production of Paper Dish 

4 Mandap Decoration Service Group Service of Mandap Decoration 

5 Papad Production Group Production of Papad 

6 Sing Bhujiya Group Production of Sing Bhujiya 

7 Washing Powder & Packing Group Production of Washing Powder 

8 Bharat and Stiching Work & Sivan Group Production of Bharat and Stiching Work & Sivan 

9 Chap Cutter, Khedan Sati,Orani,Plastik Service of Chap Cutter, Khedan Sati,Orani,Plastik Carrate,Spry Pump 

Carrate,Spry Pump Group 

10 Writing Chock Group Production of Writing Chock 

11 Check Dam/Waste Vier Group To ensure irrigation and enhance Ground Water Table. 

12 Cause way group Connectivty Between Village area and Farm area 

13 Vermi compost/ Organic Farming Group For modern Agriculture development 

14 Fuel and fodder/ Gobar bank Group Development of Gauchar land and proper use of renewable source 

15 Animal Husbandry Group Bringing of new AH technology 

Management of New Cattle and their improvement 

17 Khettalavadi Group Equitable sharing of resources 

18 Farmbund and Earthernbund Group Equitable sharing of resources Assuring of proper work 

19 Fodder bank Group Ensure fodder security in village 

Development of community land for fodder development 

Timely supply of enriched fodder at affordable price. 

20 Nursery Group Maintenance of nursery plot 

Ensure Timely supply of seedling for afforestation. 



Table no. 33.1: UG detail 

S. No, Total no. of UGs No. of members No. of SC/ST category No. of BPL in each 

category 

Men Women Both Total Categories M F Total M F Total M F Total 

64 20 27 111 (i) Landless 128 16 144 32 6 38 36 9 45 


(ii) SF 

(iii) MF 

fii) SF 

203 26 229 27 5 32 24 4 28 

297 50 347 22 2 24 21 2 23 

(iv) LF 

72 11 83 9 4 13 11 3 14 

Total 700 103 803 90 17 107 92 18 110 

4.3 Physical Activities to be undertaken under IWMP, PATAN 

4.3.1 Entry Point activity (EPA) 

EPA activities are certain important works which 

[iii] MF 

are in urgent demand of the local community. This helps in establishment of credibility of 

fiv) LF 

watershed Development Team (WDT). It also acts as a rapport building activity of the village community. A group Discussion was conducted with 

watershed Development Committee regarding the EPA activity, it was conveyed to the amount of Rs. 55.62 Lakh was allotted for EPA activity, 

which was 4 per cent of total allocated budget. The villagers discussed various activities which they felt is important but after a brief discussion it 

was conveyed to them that only those activities can taken, which revive the common natural resources. It was also taken into priority that there 

should be an instrument of convergence which will result in sustainability of activities. 

Table No. 34 Entry point activities (EPA) (All financial figures in lakh Rs.) 

Sr. 

No. 

Names of Villages 

Amount earmarked 

for EPA(Lakh) 

1 Patan 16.2767 

Entry Point Activities planned Estimated cost (Lakh) Expected outcome 

(1) Distribution of Water Pipe 

Line,Lenth=710 mt. 

(2) Pond Deepening(100x150x1.5) 

(3) Drainage and Severage Line(1000 mt 

(1)269800/- 

(2)560000/- 

(3)923000/- 

(4) 45000/- 

Total = 1797000/- 

Facility for drinking water, 

Drainage line make clean and 

healthy to village people.


with NREGA Convergence) 

(4) Water Cooler and Filter Plant 

(1) Water Cooler and Filter Plant 

(1) 45000/- 

2 Paradava 8.9911 

(2) Roof Shed in Gaushala & C.C.on 

Ground Floor 

(2) 750000/- 

(3) 60000/- 

Drinking water facility, Animal 

shed 

(3) Grass Godawon Repairing (10mx7m) 

Total =855000/- 

(1) Water Cooler and Filter Plant (Nos.-2) 

3 Amrapar 13.6766 

(2) Over Head Water Tank(Height=12 Mt) 

with capacity of 50000 lit 

(3) Computer Training to youth 

(4) Roof Shed in Gaushala & C.C.on 

Ground Floor 

(1) 90000/- 

(2) 740356/- 

(3) 25000/- 

(4) 512000/- 

Total =1367365/- 

Drinking water facility, Animal 

shed and prevent wastage of 

fodder. 

4 Malvada 4.6856 Causway of Road connected,Lenth=30mt. 

Total 43.63 Total 

450000/- 

Total =450000/- 

Road connectivity 

Table no. 35: Details of activities of preparatory phase (All financial figures in lakhs) 

Printing 

Initiation of 

Technical DPR and Estimated 

Sr. Name of 

Capacity IEC Baseline Hydro-geological 

village level 

support mapping of Cost (Rs. in 

No. villages 

building activities survey survey 

institution 

agencies project lakh) 

Area 

1 Patan 0.04069 0.10172 0.04069 0.3716 0.54 0.04069 0.020 4.06 



2 Paradava 0.02247 0.05619 0.02247 0.300 0.44 0.02247 0.020 2.24 

3 Amrapar 0.03419 0.08547 0.03419 0.370 0.64 0.03419 0.020 3.41 

4 Malvada 0.01171 0.02928 0.01171 0.170 0.23 0.01171 0.020 1.17 

4.3.2 Watershed Development Works: 

Watershed development works is to be done during implementation phase of watershed. Treatments begin from the highest point of the watershed and 

move progressively downwards (ridge to valley), starting with the smallest stream and culminating in the main river of the watershed. Work is 

location-specific, varying according to slope and geology as also the size of the stream being treated. The aim is to weave interventions into the contours of 

nature, not to seek mastery over it. A net budget of 50 percent is allotted for this work. 

. 

Ridge Area Treatment Plans 

In a watershed, the slopes falling from the ridge to the beginning of the plains are called ridge area. It is very important to treat the higher reaches of 

the ridge has this is where the major water resources originate. This involves mainly highly and forest region in the watershed. Various watershed 

managing structures should be build to arrest the erosion and degradation of forest with grasses in upper ridges. 

1. Boulder Checks 

2. Gabions3 

3. Grass seedling/planatation 



1. Boulder Checks 

Boulder checks or gully plugs are loose rock dams made on small drainage lines or seasonal streams which have a catchment area of less 

than 50 ha. It is adopted where the water velocity is high and where basically stone available with in radius of 100-150 m from the site. The main aim of 

constructing loose boulder checks is to reduce the velocity of water flowing through the drainage line. By reducing the velocity of runoff, boulder checks 

help in: 

1. Reducing soil erosion; 

2. Trapping silt which slows the rate of siltation in water harvesting structures in the lower reaches of the watershed. 

3. Creating a hydraulic head locally which enhances infiltration of surface runoff into the groundwater system; and 

4. Increasing the duration of flow in the drainage line. Therefore, the capacity of the water harvesting structures created downstream on the drainage line 

is utilized more fully as they get many more refills. 

2. Gabions 

Gabion structures are rock and wire dams constructed across drainage lines with a catchment area of 50-500 ha. They are also constructed to reinforce 

highly erodible stream embankments. The main aim of constructing gabion structures is to reduce the velocity of water flowing through the drainage 

line. By reducing the velocity of runoff, gabion structures help in 

1. Reduction in soil erosion 

2. Trapping silt, which reduces the rate of siltation in water harvesting structures in the lower reaches of the watershed. 

3. Increasing recharge of groundwater and 

4. Increasing the duration of flow in the drainage line. Therefore, the capacity of the water harvesting structures created downstream on the 

drainage line is utilized more fully as they get many more refills. 

Drainage line Treatment and water harvesting: 

The second tier treatment is the slope treatment. This is generally agricultural land or waste lands. These are generally water conservation or 

surface water storage structures. These being highly labour intensive will involve more of manual labour so schemes like National Rural 



Employment Guarantee Scheme (NREGS) can be taken. Following structures has been proposed in the project villages. 

1. Check dams/Causeway cum check dams 

2. Waste Weir 

1. Check dams 

Check dams are constructed across small streams having slope the selected should have sufficient thickness of permeable bed or weathered 

formation to facilitate recharge of stored water within short span of time. The water stored in these structures is mostly confined to stream course 

and the height is normally less than 2m and excess water is allowed to flow over the wall in order to avoid scouring from excess runoff water 

cushions are provided at downstream side. To harness the maximum run off in the stream series of such check dams are to be constructed to have 

recharge on regional scale in project villages. 

2. Waste weirs 

These are constructed for giving a safe passage to the excess runoff from the field and also store some amount of water in the field. The water 

stored in these structures is mostly confined in field and height is normally less than 0. 5 mt. and excess water is allowed to flow over the wall. 

Plains or Flat level/Field level: 

1. Farm pond 

2. Irrigation/Percolation dam 

3. Farm bund 

4. Trench excavation and Refilling for reducing salinity ingress 

5. Afforestation 

1) Farm Pond: 

There is very little qualitative difference between a pond/ tank, which usually serves the population of a village, and farm pond, which serves an 

individual agricultural field. Farms ponds greatly vary in size depending upon the rainfall. These have only a few meters of length and width and 

are built across the flow path of natural drainage channels. Surplus water from one pond spills over to a lower pond. In some cases a series of farm 

ponds are built on one single stream. Each pond caters to the irrigation needs of one farm and also augments ground water recharge. Percolation 



Dam: Percolation dams are constructed for recharging groundwater. Such structures are usually made on the upper part of the catchment area. 

Water stored here percolates to wells and tubewells located in the lower part of the catchments. Such dams can also be made in the immediate 

upstream portion of wells and tubewells. Depending on the capacity of the dam and duration of water storage, the dam can have secondary 

benefits (such as pisciculture) that are vital for the livelihood security of marginal farmers and landless laborers. 

2) Irrigation/Percolation dam 

a) Irrigation Dam: Such dams can be constructed to meet two different kinds of demands. 

of storing water during the rainy season to be used for irrigation in the post-monsoon period. 

of providing protective irrigation during dry spells within the rainy season. Most parts of India typically receive rainfall between 

June and September, very intensely within a few hours and a few days. The number of rainy days does not average more than 

40-50. Moreover, rains are extremely erratic, often characterized by late onset and early withdrawal. Prolonged dry spells during 

the rainy season, resulting in agricultural droughts, are also frequent. Hence, the kharif crop needs to be drought-proofed through 

'protective' irrigation, applied to overcome accumulated soil moisture deficits within the rainy season. Such structures are 

especially important in areas which are poor in groundwater resources and which do not have access to canal irrigation. Such areas 

form about half of India's agricultural area. 

b). Percolation Tank: Percolation dams are constructed for recharging groundwater. Such structures are usually made on the upper part of the 

catchment area. Water stored here percolates to wells and tube wells located in the lower part of the catchment. Such dams can also be made in the 

immediate upstream portion of wells and tube wells. Depending on the capacity of the dam and duration of water storage, the dam can have 

secondary benefits (such as pisciculture) that are vital for the livelihood security of marginal farmers and landless labourers. 

3) Farm bund 

Farm bunds are constructed on agricultural land with the aim of arresting soil erosion and improving the soil moisture profile. Ideally, bunds on 

farms should be made on the contour line. But this creates several problems for farmers. Contour bunds divide the field into irregular sections. In 



such a situation, it becomes inconvenient to maneuver bullocks for operations such as ploughing and line-sowing. 

4) Afforestation 

a. Emphasis is placed on maximizing the use of available land and resources with high yield tree species. Trees can either be of similar species or mixed in a manner that 

will result in a stand or forest. Depending on the climate, geographical layout of the area and the soil conditions, trees that have the greatest growth potential are selected like 

Babool, Neem, Sesame and Ailanthus 

Table no.36: Activities related to Surface water resources in the project areas (all financial figures in lakh Rs.) 

S. 

No. 

Village 

name 

Proposed target 

Augmentation/ repair of existing 

structures 

Construction of new structures Total target 

Type of structures Area to 

Area to 

Area to 

Storage Estimated 

Estimated 

Estimated 

be 

be Storage 

be Storage 

No. capacity cost No. 

cost(in 

cost(in 

irrigated 

irrigated capacity 

irrigated capacity 

(Cumec) (Lac) 

Lack) 

Lack) 

(ha) 

(ha) 

(ha) 

(i) Farm Pond 0 0 0 0 7 40 3500 0.56 40 3500 0.56 

(ii)Irrigation/Percolation 

1 10 25000 9.25 0 0 0 0 10 25000 9.25 

Patan 

Tank 

(iii) Check dam 7 250 50000 4.40 14 280 115000 29.91 540 165000 34.31 

(iv)Causeway cum check 

0 0 0 0 3 105 8945 8.25 105 8945 8.25 

dam 

Paradava (i) Farm Pond 0 0 0 0 5 35 2670 0.40 35 2670 0.40 




0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

Tank 

(iii) Check dam 0 0 0 0 17 385 195000 58.63 385 195000 58.63 


0 0 0 0 1 32 65000 6.05 32 65000 6.05 

dam 

(i) Farm Pond 0 0 0 0 10 55 4800 0.80 55 4800 0.80 


Amrapar 

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

Tank 

(iii) Check dam 0 0 0 0 14 296 125000 54.12 296 125000 54.12 


0 0 0 0 6 105 95000 50.05 105 95000 50.05 

dam 

(i) Farm Pond 0 0 0 0 3 20 2600 0.24 20 2600 0.24 


0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

Tank 

Malavada 

(iii) Check dam 0 0 0 0 7 240 56000 17.27 240 56000 17.27 


0 0 0 0 4 264 54000 13.53 264 54000 13.53 

dam 

Table no.37: Activities related to ground water resources in the project areas (all financial figures in lakh Rs.) 

Proposed target 

Augmentation/repair of existing Construction of new recharging Total Target 

Sr. 

recharging structures 

structures 

No. Village name Type of structures Area to be 

Area to be Estimated 

Estimated 

Area to be Estimated irrigated(Ha) cost(in lakh) 

No. irrigated 

No. 

cost(in lake) irrigated (ha) cost(in lake) 

(ha) 

1 Patan 

i) Open Wells 1 25 1.0 45 225 2.70 225 2.70 

ii) Bore wells 0 0 0 15 75 0.90 75 0.90 



iii) Any others 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

Total for village 0 0 0 49 232 3.60 232 3.60 

i) Open Wells 0 0 0 45 225 2.70 225 2.70 

2 Paradava 

ii) Bore wells 0 0 0 98 392 5.88 392 5.88 

iii) Any others 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 


iii) Open Wells 0 0 0 180 900 10.80 900 10.80 

3 Amrapar 

iv) Bore wells 0 0 0 80 320 4.80 320 4.80 

iii) Any others 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 


v) Open Wells 0 0 0 13 65 0.78 65 0.78 

4 Malavada 

vi) Bore wells 0 0 0 3 12 0.18 12 0.18 

iii) Any others 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 


Total 947 4360 57.48 4360 57.48 

Table no. 38: Activities related to livelihoods by Self Help Groups (SHGs) in the project areas 

Sr. 

No. 


Villages 

Name of activity 

Major activities of the SHGs 

No. of Total Average annual income 

SHGs Cost from activity per Year(in 



involved Per 

Rs. Approx) 

Unit 

1 

Vermi composting 10 22632 48054 

2 

Potato Wafer 

production 

2 141200 248400 

3 Fooder Benk 5 347200 192800 

4 Paper Dish 4 76000 139200 

5 

Mandap Decoration 

Service 

2 109700 100800 

6 Patan Papad Making 4 150000 2640000 

Door Mat 5 45000 

7 

Groundnut 

Processing 

2 60000 60000 

9 

Stretching Work & 

Sivan 

4 43250 28200 

10 Animal Distribution 

15 (150 

nos) 

35000 386000 

Total 43 3935854/- 

1 


Paradava 

Chap 

2 

Cutter,Orani,Plastick 

Carrat,Spry Pump 

5 6000 0.0 



3 

Chilly powder 

packing 

4 163000 312000 


5 (50 

nos.) 

35000 386000 

5 

Mandap Decoration 

Service 

3 109700 100800 

6 Fodder Bank 2 347200 192800 

7 

Potato Wafer 

production 

5 141200 248400 

8 

Groundnut 

Processing 

2 60000 60000 

9 Papad Making 2 150000 264000 

Total 35 1732654/- 

1 

Chilly powder 

packing 

2 163000 312000 

2 Papad Making 3 150000 264000 

3 Vermi composting 5 22632 48054 

4 

Amrapar 

10(100 

Animal Distribution 

nos) 

35000 386000 

5 

Groundnut 

Processing 

4 60000 60000 

6 Potato Wafer 5 141200 248400 



production 

7 Chalk Stick Making 4 6000 40000 

8 Fodder Bank 4 347200 192800 

Total 37 1643654/- 

1 



5 (50 

nos) 

42000 386000 

3 Malavada Fodder Bank 2 347200 192800 

Groundnut 

Processing 

1 60000 06000 

Total 13 626854/- 

Table no. 39: Other activities of watershed works phase – Proposed target 


villages 

Ridge area 

treatment 

Nursery 

raising 

Land 

development 

Crop 

demonstrations 

Fodder Land 

development 

Sr. 

No. 

(in 

ha) 

(in 

lakh) 

(in 

ha) 

(in 

lakh) (in ha) 

(in 

lakh) (in ha) (in lakh) (in ha) (in lakh) 

Total Estimated cost 

(Rs. In lakhs) 

1 Patan 100 12.50 2 0.80 564.4 29.91 0 0 15 11.19 54.40 

2 Paradava 75 9.35 2 0.80 424.55 58.63 0 0 5 3.73 72.51 

3 Amrapar 50 6.20 1 0.40 1016.2 54.12 0 0 10 7.46 68.18 

4 Malavada 80 10.61 1 0.40 136.95 17.27 0 0 5 3.73 32.01 



Table no.40: Details of engineering structures in watershed works* 

Type of treatment 

Type of land 

Executing 

agency 

Target 

Estimated cost 

Expected 

Sr. 

No. 

Village 

name 

Name of structures 

(i) 

Ridge 

area 

(R) 

(ii) 

Drainag 

e line 

(D) 

(iii) 

Land 

dev. (L) 

(i) 

Pri-v 

ate 

(ii) 

Commun 

ity 

(iii) 

Others 

(pl. 

specify) 

(i) UG 

(ii)SHG 

(iii) 

Others (pl. 

specify) 

No. of 

units 

(No./ 

cu.m./ 

rmt) 

(Rs. in lakh) 

M W O T 

month & 

year of 

completi 

on 

(mm/yyy 

y) 

Staggered 

trenching/Stone 

R C (DCF,Teri 

100 Ha 1250000 

bunding(SCT) 

ttorrial) 

1 Patan 

Earthen Bunds 

D 

C 

(DCF,Teri 

ttorrial) 

6000 rmt 

1425000 

Waste Weir(5 mt 

Length) 

D 

P 

(DCF,Teri 

ttorrial) 

220 2970000 

Field bunds 

L 

P 

(DCF,Teri 

ttorrial) 

70000 

rmt 

3920000 



2 Paradava 

Gully Plug D C 

(DCF,Teri 

ttorrial) 

300 Nos. 2700000 

Check Dam D C 

(DCF,Teri 

ttorrial) 

15 2991700 

Cause Way D C 

(DCF,Teri 

ttorrial) 

2 825000 

(DCF,Teri 

Percolation Tank 

ttorrial) 

0.0 

Farm Pond L P 

(DCF,Teri 

ttorrial) 

7 56000 

Staggered 

(DCF,Teri 

trenching/Stone R 

C 

ttorrial) 

bunding(SCT) 

70 Ha 875000 

(DCF,Teri 

D 

C 

Earthen Bunds 

ttorrial) 2500 rmt 

593750 


(DCF,Teri 

D 

P 

Length) 

ttorrial) 

188 2538000 

(DCF,Teri 48000 

L P 

Field bunds 

ttorrial) rmt 

2688000 

(DCF,Teri 

D 

C 

Gully Plug 

ttorrial) 70 Nos. 

630000 

Check Dam D C (DCF,Teri 16 5148000 



3 Amrapar 

Cause Way D C 


Farm Pond L P 

Staggered 

trenching/Stone R 

C 

bunding(SCT) 

Earthern Bunds 

D 

C 


Length) 

D 

P 

Field bunds 

L P 

Gully Plug 

D 

C 

Check Dam D C 

Cause Way D C 

ttorrial) 

(DCF,Teri 

ttorrial) 

1 605000 

(DCF,Teri 

ttorrial) 

0.0 

(DCF,Teri 

ttorrial) 

5 40000 

(DCF,Teri 

ttorrial) 

45 Ha 562500 

(DCF,Teri 

ttorrial) 2265 

537938 

(DCF,Teri 

ttorrial) 

241 2889000 

(DCF,Teri 95000 

ttorrial) rmt 

5320000 

(DCF,Teri 

ttorrial) 40 Nos. 

360000 

(DCF,Teri 

ttorrial) 

14 5412000 

(DCF,Teri 

ttorrial) 

6 5005000 



4 Malavada 


Farm Pond L P 

Staggered 

trenching/Stone 

bunding(SCT) 

R 

C 

(DCF,Teri 

ttorrial) 

(DCF,Teri 

ttorrial) 

(DCF,Teri 

ttorrial) 

0.0 

10 80000 

60 Ha 750000 

Earthern Bunds D C (DCF,Teri 

ttorrial) 

2000 rmt 475000 


(DCF,Teri 

D 

P 

ttorrial) 

Length) 

57 769500 

Field bunds L P (DCF,Teri 

8500 rmt 588000 

ttorrial) 

Gully Plug D C 20 Nos. 180000 

Check Dam D C (DCF,Teri 

ttorrial) 

7 1727000 

Cause Way D C (DCF,Teri 

ttorrial) 

4 1353000 


(DCF,Teri 

ttorrial) 

0.0 

Farm Pond L P (DCF,Teri 

ttorrial) 

3 24000 

Total 5,75,38,388/- 



Table No. 40.1, Technical Specification of stone bund 

Particulars Value Units 

Top width of bund 0.5 Mt. 

Bottom width of Bund 1.3 Mt. 

Depth above ground level 0.55 Mt. 

Depth of Foundation 0.2 Mt. 

Cross section of bund 0.68 Sq. M 

Proposed Area 250.00 Ha. 

2. Staggered contour Trenches 

Over time, experience of watershed programs has shown that it is better to stagger the digging of contour trenches. This is because it has been 

found that invariably errors have been made in contouring over long distances. If the contour trench is not level and by mistake sloped, then water 

starts to flow from the high point to low point, cutting a path and increasing soil erosion. Therefore instead of making trenches continuous they 

should be made in staggered, discontinuous manner. Trenches are any form of depression or micro pit constructed over the land surface in order 

to prevent soil erosion and to absorb rainwater in non arable lands. Trenches are constructed along the contours [called contour trenches) on hill 

slopes above 15% with vegetative supports for forestry and horticulture land uses. Contour trenches are used both on hill slopes as well as on 

degraded and barren waste lands for soil and moisture conservation and afforestation purposes. The trenches break the slope and reduce the 

velocity of surface runoff. It can be used in all slopes irrespective of rainfall conditions (i.e. in both high and low rainfall conditions), varying soil 

properties. For vegetative supports forage grasses as well as economic trees can be planted. The trenches were working as silt trap earlier. 

Periodical maintenance by way of unearthing of the trenches and depositing on the downhill side ought to be given due attention by the 

beneficiaries themselves. 

Table No. 40.2, Technical Details of Staggered Contour Trenches 

Particulars Value Units 

Trench Length 5.00 Mt. 



Trench Width 0.6 Mt. 

Trench Depth 1.0 Mt. 

No. Of Trenches Per Ha. 100 Nos. 

Proposed Area 30.00 Ha. 

Table No 40.3, Quantity Calculation 

Sr. 

Description Unit No. Length 

Width 

Depth 

Quantity 

No. 

(Mt.) 

(Mt.) 

(Mt..) 

1 Layout of Contour Lines Sq.m 30500 5.00 0.6 91500 

2 General Work 

Clearing bushes / Dag Belling 2.5 to 5.00 cm deep Sq.m 30500 5.00 0.6 91500 

3 Earth Work 

Earth work in excavation in foundation/trench upto 1.5 meter depth. Compaction of 

bottom, correction of sides, refilling of blank spaces with soil and disposal of remaining 

soil a) In upto ordinary/soft SOmtr. soil 

b) In hard soil/clay/murrum Cu.m. 30500 5.00 0.6 1.00 91500 

c) Fragmented rock 

d] ordinary rock 

4 Vegetative Work 

Sowing of seed on the constructed ridge Meter 30500 5.00 152500 



5 Supply of Tecoma/Alata/Dhaman/Pera Seed @ 4 gm/Meter in two lines Kg 39 39 

6 Overseeding of grasses in between two furrows including seed treatment and pallet Kg 2440 2440 

making etc. complete @ 8 kg/ha 



Table No 40.4 Cost Estimation of Staggered contour trench 

Sr. No. Description Unit Quantity Rate 

@SOR 

(Rs.) 

Amount 

1 Layout of Contour Lines Sq.m 91500.00 0.25 22875.0 


Dag Belling 2.5 to 5.00 cm deep Sq.m 91500.00 1.0 91500.0 

3 Earth Work 

Earth work in excavation in foundation/trench upto 1.5 meter depth. Compaction of 

bottom, correction of sides, refilling of blank spaces with soil and disposal of remaining 

soil a) In upto ordinary/soft SOmtr. soil 

b) In hard soil/clay/murrum Cu.m. 91500.00 41.0 3751500.0 

c) Fragmented rock 

d) ordinary rock 


Sowing of seed on the constructed ridge 

Meter 152500.00 

Supply of Tecoma/Alata/Dhaman/Pera Seed @ 4 gm/Meter in two lines 

5 Overseeding of grasses in between two furrows including seed treatment and pallet 

making etc. complete @ 8 kg/ha 

6 Sub Total 

Contigency (0 %) 

Supervision Charges (0 %) 

Sub Total 

Grand Total 3867825/- 

(Rs.) 

Kg 39 50.0 1950.0 



Table No 40.4 (A):- Cost Estimation of Staggered contour trench per Village 

Sr.no. Village Name Area (Ha) Nos. Cost 

1 Patan 100 10000 

2 Paradava 70 7000 

3 Amrapar 45 4500 

1250000 

875000 

562500 

4 Malavada 60 6000 

750000 

Total 305 27500 3437500/- 

Table No 40.4 (B):- Cost Estimation of Gully Plug per Village 

Sr No Villagae Name Gully Plug Nos. Cost 

1 Patan 300 2700000 

2 Paradava 70 630000 

3 Amrapar 40 360000 

4 Malavada 20 180000 

Total 430 3870000/- 

3.A Waste Vier for village pond 

It was proposed to draw a Waste Vier with the below specification to safe removal of runoff to control soil erosion. 

Table No 40.5, Technical Details of Waste Vier 



Particulars Quantity Unit 

Waste Vier Length 10.00 Mt. 

Waste Vier Type 

Trapezoidal 

Waste Vier height form foundation 1.6 Mt. 

Waste Vier top Width 1.00 Mt. 

Waste Vier Bottom Width 2.0 Mt. 

Waste Vier Section 0.9 SqMt. 

Table no 40.6, Quantity Calculation of Waste vier (Per Rmt) 

Sr. Description 

No. 1 Earth Work in excavation in soft soil upto 1.5 m depth and disposing excavated stuff 

upto lead of 50 m. 

2 Earth Work in excavation in soft rock upto 1.5 m depth and disposing excavated stuff 

upto lead of 50 m. 

3 cc 1:4:8 as a foundation concrete for walls using 40 mm coarse aggregates including 

curing compaction etc completed 

4 uncoarse rubble masonary in cm 1:5 including racking out joints and finishing curing 

etc. completed (a) Below GL 

Unit No. Length Width Depth Quantity 

Cum 1 (Mt.) 1.0 (Mt.) 2.0 (Mt..) 0.5 1 Cum 

Cum 1 1.0 2.0 0.5 1 Cum 

Cum 1 1.0 2.0 0.1 0.2 Cum 

Cum 1 1.0 2.0 0.9 1.8 



uncoarse rubble masonary in cm 1:5 including racking out joints and finishing curing Cum 1 1.0 1.5 0.5 0.75 

etc. completed (a) Above GL 

Total Masonry quantity Cum 2.55 

5 cc 1:2:4 as a coping at the top of walls including vibrating finishing curing etc. Cum 1 1.0 1.0 0.1 0.1 

completed 

6 12 mm thick plaster on outer surface of walls in cm 1:3 including racking out joints 20 1 1.0 1.0 1 

mm deep, curing finishing etc. completed (a) Body wall to U/S 

Sqm 

7 12 mm thick plaster on outer surface of walls in cm 1:3 including racking out joints 20 Sqm 1 1.0 0.65 0.65 

mm deep, curing finishing etc. completed (a) Body wall to D/S 

8 Total quantity of plaster Sqm 1.65 

Table no 40.7, Cost Calculation of Waste weir (Per Rmt) 



@SOR 

1 Earth Work in excavation in soft soil upto 1.5 m depth and disposing Cum 1 41 41 

2 Earth Work in excavation in soft rock upto 1.5 m depth and disposing 

1 96 96 

excavated stuff upto lead of 50 m. 

3 cc 1:4:8 as a foundation concrete for walls using 40 mm coarse aggregates Cum 0.2 1600 320 


4 uncoarse rubble masonary in cm 1:5 including racking out joints and 

including curing compaction etc completed 

finishing uncoarse curing rubble etc. masonary completed in cm (a) 1:5 Below including GL racking out joints and 

finishing curing etc. completed (a) Above GL 

Total Masonry quantity 2.55 1460 3723 

5 cc 1:2:4 as a coping at the top of walls including vibrating finishing curing Cum 0.1 2420 242 

etc. completed 

(Rs.) 

Amount 

(Rs.)


6 12 mm thick plaster on outer surface of walls in cm 1:3 including racking 

out joints 20 mm deep, curing finishing etc. completed (a) Body wall to U/S 

Sqm 1.65 78 128.70 

7 Sub Total 4550.70 

Contigency (3 %) 136.52 

Supervision Charges (1.5%) 68.26 

Sub Total 204.78 

Grand Total 4755.48 

Say 4700.00 

Total 2.0 nos. of 15 m length for the project. (per Rmt cost 4700/-) Total cost 164500 

40.8 Details of the waste vier in Patan Project 

Sr 

No. 

1 


Village 

Activity Survey No. Estimated Cost 

Nagbai Talav West Weir 185 70500 

2 Patan Nathubhai Vadi Na Talav No West Weir 94000 

Total 164500/- 

Table no 40.9, Technical Details of Check Dam 


Check Dam Length 1.0 Mt. 

Check Dam Type 

Trapezoidal 

Check Dam height form foundation 1.5 Mt. 

Check Dam top Width 1.0 Mt. 

Check Dam Bottom Width 2.0 Mt. 



Check Dam apron length 1 Mt. 

Check Dam apron width 2 Mt. 

Check Dam apron depth 1 Mt. 

Check Dam Section 2.25 SqMt. 

Table no. 40.10, Quantity Calculation of Check dam (Per Rmt) 

Sr. No. Description Unit No. Length (Mt.) Width (Mt.) Depth Quantity 

1 Earth Work in excavation in soft soil upto 1.5 m depth and disposing Cum 1 1.0 2.0 

(Mt..) 

0.5 1 Cum 

excavated stuff upto lead of 50 m. for body wall 

Earth Work in excavation in soft soil upto 1.5 m depth and disposing Cum 1 1.0 2.0 0.5 1 Cum 

excavated stuff upto lead of 50 m. for apron 

Total quantity Cum 2 

2 Earth Work in excavation in soft rock upto 1.5 m depth and disposing Cum 1 1.0 2.0 0.5 1 Cum 

excavated stuff upto lead of 50 m. for body wall 

Earth Work in excavation in soft rock upto 1.5 m depth and disposing Cum 1 1.0 2.0 0.5 1 Cum 

excavated stuff upto lead of 50 m. for apron 

Total quantity Cum 1 

3 cc 1:4:8 as a foundation concrete for walls using 40 mm coarse aggregates Cum 1 1.0 2.0 0.1 0.2 Cum 

including curing compaction etc completed for body wall 

cc 1:4:8 as a foundation concrete for walls using 40 mm coarse aggregates Cum 1 1.0 2.0 0.1 0.2 Cum 

including curing compaction etc completed for appron 

Total quantity Cum 0.4 Cum 

4 uncoarse rubble masonary in cm 1:5 including racking out joints and Cum 1 1.0 2.0 0.9 1.8 

finishing curing etc. completed (a) Below GL 

Appron 1 1 2.0 0.8 1.60 



uncoarse rubble masonary in cm 1:5 including racking out joints and Cum 1 1.0 1.5 1.4 2.1 


Toe wall 1 1.0 0.5 0.45 0.23 


5 cc 1:2:4 as a coping at the top of walls including vibrating finishing curing etc. Cum 1 1.0 1.0 0.1 0.1 

completed (a) body wall 

(b) Appron 1 1.0 1.5 0.1 0.15 

(c) Toe wall 1 1.0 0.5 0.1 0.05 

Total 0.30 

6 12 mm thick plaster on outer surface of walls in cm 1:3 including racking out 

joints 20 mm deep, curing finishing etc. completed (a) Body wall to U/S 

Sqm 

1 1.0 1.8 1.8 

7 12 mm thick plaster on outer surface of walls in cm 1:3 including racking out Sqm 1 1.0 1.65 1.65 

joints 20 mm deep, curing finishing etc. completed (b) Body wall to D/S 

(c) Toe wall 2 1.0 0.45 0.90 

3 Total quantity of plaster Sqm 4.35 

40.11 Cost Calculation for Check Dam 



Sr. No. 

Rate Amount 

Description Unit Quantity @SOR (Rs.) 

(Rs.) 




2 96 192 






uncoarse rubble masonary in cm 1:5 including racking out joints and 


Total Masonry quantity 5.73 1460 8365.80 

5 cc 1:2:4 as a coping at the top of walls including vibrating finishing curing Cum 0.3 2420 726 


6 12 mm thick plaster on outer surface of walls in cm 1:3 including racking Sqm 4.35 78 339.30 

out joints 20 mm deep, curing finishing etc. completed 

7 Sub Total 10345.10 







Say 11000 

40.12 Details of the Check Dam in Patan Project 

Sr Name of 


No. Village 

1 Patan Check Dam-1 Andhariya Nesh(Near Jetha 

165000 

179, 180,182,183 

Uka’s Farm) 

2 Check Dam -2 Andhariya Nesh(Near Bhikha 

198000 

165,181 

Uka’s Farm) 

3 Check Dam-1Bochavadi Nesh(Across 

110000 

173,174,175,176 

Kothavala Vokada) 

4 Check Dam-2Bochavadi Nesh(Across 

110000 

173,174,175,176,177,179 

Kothavala Vokada) 

5 Check Dam Near Harsha Jaliya 

495000 

166/p3,166/p1 

Nesh(Savdashbhai’s Farm) 

6 Check Dam Near Savdashbhai 

165000 

68,61,63,58,59 

farm(Govarakhi Nesh) 



7 Check Dam Near Budha Bhura Farm(Vadali 

Nesh) 

8 Check Dam Near Bhagabhai Harubhai 

Bariya Farm (Govrakhi Nesh) 

9 Check Dam Near Gogan Devarkhi Farm 

(Chapal Iae Nesh) 

10 Check Dam on Malavada River (Chapal Iae 

Nesh) 

11 Check Dam-1 Near Hamirbhai Jetabhai 

Farm (Ganga Jalliya Nesh) 

12 Check Dam-2 in Hathi Paga Area (Ganga 

Jalliya Nesh) 

13 Check Dam-3 Near Dharu Zarukh Vali Dhar 

(Ganga Jalliya Nesh) 

14 Check Dam in Ambaliya Dhar (Near Nirama 

Leas) 

110,112,113,109/p1, 

220000 

29/p2,29/p3,42,43, 

330000 

58,58/p2,59,60,61 

605000 

29,30/p1,2,31,34 

165000 

185/p,114,119 

110000 

185/p,119 

176000 

185,185/p,117,199 

110000 

18/p1 to 18/p9,19/p1 to 19/p9,20,21,22 

132000 

Total 2991700 

1 Paradava Checkdam-1Near Keshu Rama Farm 

550000 

260,261,262,263,264,266 

(Humiya Dhar ) 

2 Checkdam-2 Near Keshu Rama Farm 260,261,262,263,264,266 330000 



(Humiya Dhar Shelu) 

3 Chaeckdam-3 Near Chana Rama Farm 


4 Checkdam-4 Near Chana Rama Farm 


5 Check Dam-1 Near Natha Meraman Farm 

(Bhakhar Aata Galo ) 

6 Check Dam-2 Near Lakhanshi Fora Farm 

(Bhakhar Aata Galo ) 

7 Check Dam-1Near Bhatu Saheb Farm North 

Side (Bhediya Dhar) 

8 Check Dam-2 Near Bhatu Saheb Farm 

North Side (Bhediya Dhar) 

9 Check Dam Near Ghela Mohan Koli Farm 

(Amrapar – Paradava Road) 

10 Check Dam Near Lakhmanbhai Bachubhai 

Farm(Paradava-Amrapar Approch Road) 

11 Check Dam in Vidi Dhar Valo Vokado 

(Samat Abhu Farm) 

12 Check Dam Near Deva Veja farm (Tekari 

Valo Galo) 

260,261,262,263,264,266 

253000 

260,261,262,263,264,266 

385000 

260,261,262,263,264,266 

660000 

260,261,262,263,264,266 

462000 

140,148 

550000 

140,148 

715000 

44,45,273,274,277,278,278/p1,p16 

198000 

269,270,273 308000 

174,175,177 198000 

210,212,215 220000 



13 Check Dam Near Devabhai Patabhai 19,20,21 220000 

14 Check Dam-1Ubera Valo Vokalo (Suka 

198000 

176,177 

Jodha Farm) 

15 Check Dam-2 Ubera Valo Vokalo 177,178 220000 

16 Check Dam-3 Ubera Valo Vokalo 177,178,179 242000 

17 Check Dam-4 Ubera Valo Vokalo 177,178,179 154000 

Total 5863000 

1 Amrapar Dhuniya Valo Area 30,55,72,73,74,75 440000 

2 Check Dam-1 Zil Pat Vokaro(Mulu Oghad 

330000 

30,55,56,72,74,75 

Khunti) 

3 Check Dam-2 Zil Pat Vokaro(Khima Sajan) 14,30,55,73,75 275000 

4 Check Dam-3 Zil Pat Vokaro(Sarkari 

275000 

15,16,17 

Kharabo) 

5 Check Dam Across Vagadiya Pir Vokaro 

74,75 

242000 

6 Check Dam -1Across Suliya Vokaro(Malde 

Kana Farm) 

7 Check Dam -1Across Suliya Vokaro(Viram 

Karu Farm) 

8 Check Dam-1 Keshubhai Samat 

Modhavadiya(Malar Vokaro) 

134,175,485 330000 

134,175,485 330000 

381,386,388,389 

440000 



9 Check Dam-2 Bhima Samat 

385000 

380,381,382,383,386,389 

Modhavadiya(Malar Vokaro) 

10 Check Dam-3 Jetha Jogal(Malar Vokaro) 380,381,382,383,386,389 275000 

11 Check Dam on Dudhara Vokaro 141,142,465/p85,482,483 660000 

12 Check Dam on Vala Vav Vokaro 465/p1/9/10/12/17,483 770000 

13 Check Dam-1 on Shel no Vokaro(Lakhabhai 

385000 

364/p1,361 

Vastabhai) 

14 Check Dam-2 on Shel no Vokaro(Keshu 

275000 

361,364,365,366,367 

Saheb) 

Total 5412000 

1 Malavada Check Dam on Gandiya Pir Valo Vokaro 35/p West Land 275000 

2 Check Dam on Sumiya Dhuna Valo Vokaro 

(Bala Karashan) 

35/p West Land 242000 

3 Check Dam Near Suga Devarkhi Farm 1, 220000 

4 Check Dam-1 Near Haji Pir Vali 

Tekari(Right Side) 

5 Check Dam-2 Near Haji Pir Vali Tekari(Left 

Side) 

6 Check Dam-3 Near Haji Pir Vali 

Tekari(Near HajiPir Darga) 

51,53,64,65 275000 

51,53,64,65 220000 

47,51,53,54,64 220000 



7 Check Dam Bandhel Gali No Vokaro 10,11,12,13,17,19,15 275000 

Total 1727000 

Table no 40.13 Technical Details of Cause way 


Cause way Length 1.0 Mt. 

Cause way Type 

Rectangle 

Cause way height form foundation 2.0 Mt. 

Cause way top Width 4.5 Mt. 

Cause way Bottom Width 4.5 Mt. 

Cause way Section 9.0 SqMt. 

Table no. 40.14 Quantity Calculation of Cause way (Per Rmt) 



Sr. No. Description Unit No. Length 

Width 

Depth 

Quantity 

(Mt.) 

(Mt.) 

(Mt..) 

1 Earth Work in excavation in soft soil upto 1.5 m depth and 

Cum 

1.0 1.0 0.5 1 

disposing excavated stuff upto lead of 50 m. long walls 

2 

2 Earth Work in excavation in soft rock upto 1.5 m depth and 

disposing excavated stuff upto lead of 50 m. for long walls 

Cum 2 1.0 1.0 0.5 1 

3 cc 1:4:8 as a foundation concrete for walls using 40 mm Cum 2 1.0 1.0 0.1 0.2 Cum 

coarse aggregates including curing compaction etc completed 

for long walls 

cc 1:4:8 as a foundation concrete for walls using 40 mm Cum 1 1.0 2.5 0.1 0.25 

coarse aggregates including curing compaction etc completed 

for bed 

Total quantity Cum 0.45 Cum 

4 uncoarse rubble masonary in cm 1:5 including racking out Cum 2 1.0 1.0 1.80 3.60 

joints and finishing curing etc. completed for walls 

Bed 1 1 2.50 0.60 1.5 


5 cc 1:2:4 as a coping at the top of walls including vibrating 

finishing curing etc. completed (a) body wall 

Cum 1 1.0 4.5 0.2 0.9 



6 12 mm thick plaster on outer surface of walls in cm 1:3 

including racking out joints 20 mm deep, curing finishing etc. 

completed (a) Body wall to U/S 

Sqm 

2 1.0 1.5 3 

40.15 Cost Calculation for Cause way 


@SOR 

(Rs.) 

Amount 

(Rs.) 




1 96 96 






uncoarse rubble masonary in cm 1:5 including racking out joints and 


Total Masonry quantity 5.1 1460 7446 



5 cc 1:2:4 as a coping at the top of walls including vibrating finishing curing 


6 12 mm thick plaster on outer surface of walls in cm 1:3 including racking 

out joints 20 mm deep, curing finishing etc. completed 

Cum 0.9 2420 2178 

Sqm 3 78 234 

6 Sub Total 10715 





Say 11000.00 

Total 13 nos. of 30 m length for the project. (per Rmt cost 11000/-) Total cost 6688000.00 

40.16 Details of the Cause Way in Patan Project 



No. Village 

1 Patan Cause Way Near Bochavadi Nesh 175,176 330000 

2 Pankhera Nadi Par Cause Way(Pankhera 

495000 

29/p2,29/p3,31/p1,2,31,34,36 

Nesh) 



3 Gala Valo Vokaro Cause Way (Mahiki 

198000 

137,141/p1,142,143,144/p2 

Road) 

Total 825000/- 

1 

Cause Way Cum Check Dam on Prashala 

605000 

Paradava 

99,98,113,114,119,125,126 

Road (Near Karashan Menand) 

Total 605000/- 

1 

159,160/2,160/p1,166,211,207,211,212 1210000 

Amrapar Cause Way Cum Check Dam Dolar 

Talav(Kutiyana –Amrapar Road) 

2 Cause Way Cum Check on Timbli Dhar Valo 138/1,138/2,154,148,145,147 275000 

Vokaro 

3 Cause Way Cum Check Dem-1on Pata Valo 99,100,101,129,132,133 990000 

Vokaro(Near Malde Kana Farm) 

4 Cause Way Cum Check Dem-1on Pata Valo 99,133,134,165,174,175 990000 

Vokaro(Near Samsan) 

5 Cause Way Cum Check Dem on Dhun Khan 

440000 

30,55,72,73,74,75 

Vistar(Kutiyana-Amrapar Road) 

6 Cause Way Cum Check Near Jadav Raja 

1100000 

157,218,216,158 

Farm(Dhun Khan Area) 

Total 5005000/- 

1 Malavada Cause Way on Prashala Na Marge(Jiva 26/p,35/p 660000 



Karana) 

2 Cause Way Cum Check Dem on Prashala 

Na Marge(Muru Naja) 

3 Cause Way Cum Check Dem(Dudhala Valo 

Vokaro) Near Punja Karshan farm 

4 Cause Way Cum Check Dem(Near Natha 

Nungha Farm) 

35/p Gam Tal 253000 

27,28,29 275000 

36/p1 To 36/p5,37/p2 165000 

Total 1353000/- 

Table No 40.17. Repairing & Dislting Check Dam 

Sr No. Village Name Activity Survey No. Cost 

1 

2 

Patan Repairing & Dislting of Khodiyar 

Check Dam 

Deepnning & Dislting of Near 

Near Ram Bhai Dayabhai Farm 

Karabhai Vasabhai Farm(Govarakhi 

3 Nesh) Deepnning & Dislting of Near 

Savdashbhai Farm(Govarakhi Nesh 

4 Deepnning & Dislting of Vadali Nesh 

(Gat Valo Check Dam 

5 Deepnning & Dislting of Near 

Ramabhai Dadhi Farm (Nadi Valo 


Area) 

137,141/p1,142,143,144/p2 50000 

65,66,67 85000 

61,62,63 80000 

110,112,113,109/p1 45000 

185/p 50000



Merkhibhai Farm(Chapal I Nesh) 


Rajabhai Odedara Farm 

52,58,193 65000 

100,101,120,128 65000 

Total 440000/- 

Slope treatment: 

The second tier treatment is the slope treatment, This is generally agricultural land or waste lands.Thse are generally water conservation or 

surface water storage structures. These being highly labour intensive will involve more of manual labour so schemes like National Rural 

Employment Guarantee Scheme (NREGS) can be taken. 

Following structures are been proposed in these areas 

1. Earthen Bund 

2. Waste Weir 

3. Afforestation 

Earthen Bund 

Table no 40.18 Technical details of Earth Bund No.l 

Particulars 

Value 

Structure Length 1000 Mt. 

Structure Height 1.5 Mt. 

Upstream Slope 2:1 



Downstream Slope 1:1 

Bund Top Width 1.0 Mt. 

Structure Base Width 6.00 Mt. 

Structure Cross Section 5.25 SqMt. 

Table no 40.19, Quantity Calculation of Earth Bund No.l 

Sr. No. Description Unit No. of Length Width Height/depth Quantity 

Structures (Mt) 


2 Clearing bushes / Dag Belling 2.5 to 5.00 cm deep Mt 1 1000 6 6000 sq.m 

3 Earth Work 

Construction of earthen bund (dry of moist) 

excavation and laying in 15 cm layer, breaking of 

clods, 

Cu.M 1 1000 3.5(Avg) 1.5 5250 Cu. M 

separating leaves and small stones, dressing and 

compaction with sheep foot roller or hand 

rammer, 

upto 1.5 meter lift and 50 meter lead. 

a) ordinary soil Cum 1 1000 3.5(Av 1.5 5250 Cu. M 

b) hard soil Cum 



Table No, 40.20, Cost Estimation of Earth Bund No.l 

SR. NO. Description Unit Quantity Rate 


(Rs.) 

Amount 

(Rs.) 

Clearing bushes / Dag Belling 2.5 to 5.00 cm deep Sq.m 6000 2 12000 

2. Earth Work 

Construction of earthen bund (dry of moist) excavation and laying in 15 cm 

layer, breaking of clods, separating leaves and small stones, dressing and 

compaction with sheep foot roller or hand rammer, uptp 1.5 meter lift and 50 

meter lead. 

a) ordinary soil Cum 5250 41 215250 

b) hard soil 

3 

Sub Total 227250 

Contigency (in 3 %) 6817 

Supervision Charges (in 1.5 %) 3400 


Grand Total 237467 



40.21 Details of the Earthen Bund / Earthen Embankment in Patan Project 



No. Village 

1 

Earthen Bund Near Harshakh 

166,166/p1,166/p3,165 356250 

Dungar(Batha Uka) 

2 Earthen Bund Near Harshali Dungar(Bijal 165,166,166/p1,166/p3 356250 

Deva) 

3 Earthen Bund Near Rambhai Dayabhai 141,142, 237500 

Patan 

Farm(Mahiki Road) 

4 Earthen Bund Near Virambhai Karanabhai 137,138,141 237500 

Farm (Mahiki Road) 

5 Earthen Bund Near Sodha Indubha 143,144,1149,150 237500 

Bhavansing 

Total 1425000/- 

1 

Earthen Bund Near Sanjaybhai Odedara 103,59,60,59/p1,2,3 118750 

Farm(Bhediyadhar) 

2 Earthen Bund Near Laxmanbhai 

,6,7,8/p2,12,13,40,39/p1, 237500 

Paradava 

Bachubhai(Dudhala Road) 

3 Earthen Bund Near Seta 

1,2,3,30,39,41, 270,271 237500 

Dungar(Paradava-Amrapar Road) 

Total 593750/- 



1 

Upla Katha na Vokara Vala Talav Earthen 69,70,71,72,78,79,81,82,119 62938 

Embankment 

2 Earthen Bund Near Keshubhai 

74,75,76,77,218,216,165,166 237500 

Amrapar 

Modhavadiya 

3 Earthen Bund Near Malar Vokara(Seta 100,128,465/p,78,124,125,126 237500 

Dungar) 

Total 537938/- 

1 

Earthen Bund Near Malavada Gingani 21,22 237500 

Road(Deviben Samat Charan,Jiva Samat) 

Malavada 

2 Earthen Bund Near Hun no Nesh(Punja 37/p1,36/p1 237500 

Natha Farm) 

Total 475000/- 

/- 

Table no.41: Details of activities connected with vegetative cover in watershed works 

Sr. Name of Name of structure/ 

Executing 

Type of treatment 

Type of land 

Target 

No. village work 

agency 



Patan 

Paradava 

Amrapar 

(i) UG 

Expected 

(i) (ii) (iii) 

(iii) (ii)SHG 

month & 

Estimated 

Ridge Drainage Land (i) (ii) Others (iii) Area No. of 

year of 

cost 

area line dev. Private Community (pl. Others (ha) plants 

completion 

Rs. 

(R) (D) (L) 

specify) (pl. 

(mm/ 

specify) 

yyyy) 

Afforestation R L C F Forest 12 13332 1698396 May-2013 

Plantation/Grass 

R L C F Forest 5 

Seeding(SCT,BCT) 

10000 May-2012 

Fodder L C SHG 17 1268200 Jan-2012 

Nursery raising L C C 3 120000 May-2012 

Total 3096596/- 



R L C F Forest 4.1 


8200 May-2012 

Fodder R L C F 5 373000 Jan-2012 

Nursery raising L C SHG 2 80000 May-2012 

Total 1168865/- 



R L C F Forest 8.5 17000 


May-2012 




Malavada 


Total 1227599/- 



R L C F Forest 0.85 


1700 May-2012 



Total 839299/- 

Grand Total 5493060/- 

Horticulture Plantation: 

Table No, 41.1, Technical Details of Horticulture Activities ( Area 1 Ha per village) 

Particulars 

Value 

Crop Name 

Mango/Sapota/Chiku 

Plant To Plant Spacing 8.00 mt 

Row to Row Spacing 8.00 mt 

Pit Length 1.00 mt 

Pit Width 1.00 mt 

Pit Depth 1.00 mt 

No. of Plants 156 Nos. 

Plantation Area 1 Ha. 

No. of Plants per ha 156 Nos. 

Plants for Gap Filling 374 20 % 

Total Nos of plants 2246 No. 



Table No, 41.2, Cost Estimation for Horticulture activity 

Sr. No. Description No. Lengt 

h(m.) (m.) (m.) 

1 Digging of pits for plants in Ordinary murum 156 1 1 1 Cum 156.00 41 6396 

2 Plants saplings for plantation in Govt. pasture area,sapling not less 

Width 

Depth 

Unit Quantity Rate Amount 

156 Nos. 156.00 100 15600 

than 30 cm. height 

3 Transportation of plants from nursery to camp site upto 5Km 156 Nos. 156.00 LS 1500 

4 Loading and unloading of plants 156 Nos. 156.00 LS 800 

5 Cost of fertiliser & insecticides incl. application 156 Nos. 156.00 10 1560 

6 Weeding and Hoeing two times (Twice in year] 156 Nos. 156.00 2 312 

7 Irrigation Facility (Drip/Bore) 6 Nos. LS 30000 

Total 56168 

Say 56000 

SR No. Village Name Horticulture Area 

1 Patan 3 

2 Paradava 2 

3 Amrapar 3 

(Ha) 

Estimation Cost 

168000 

112000 

168000 

4 Malavada 1 

56000 

Total 9 504000/- 



Farm Pond : 

There is very little qualitative difference between a pond/ tank, which usually serves the population of a village, and farm pond, which serves an 

individual agricultural field. Farms ponds greatly vary in size depending upon the rainfall. These have only a few metres of length and width and 

are built across the flow path of natural drainage channels. Surplus water from one pond spills over to a lower pond. In some cases a series of farm 

ponds are built on one single stream. Each pond caters to the irrigation needs of one farm and also augments ground water recharge. 

Table No, 41.3 Technical Details of Farm Pond 1 


Pond Length 10 Mt. 

Pond Width 10 Mt 

Pond Depth 2 Mt. 

Side Slope 1:1 

Table No, 41.4, Quantity Excavation for Farm Pond 1 

Sr No Description Unit Pond Top 

Area fSq.m) 

Pond Bottom 

Area (Sq.m) 


Clearing bushes / Dag Belling 2.5 to 5.00 cm deep Sq. m. 100 100 

2 Earth Work 

Construction of earthen bund (dry of moist) excavation and laying in 15 cm layer, Sq.m 100 36 2.0 160 

breaking of clods, separating leaves and small stones, dressing and compaction with 

sheep a) ordinary foot roller soil or hand rammer, uptp 1.5 meter lift and 50 meter lead. 

Cum 160 

b) hard soil Cum 

For 25 no. of farm ponds Cum 4000 

Dept h 

(M) 

Quantity 



Table No, 41.5, Cost Estimation of Farm pond No.1 

Sr. No. Description Unit Quantity Rate (Rs.) Amount 


Clearing bushes / Dag Belling 2.5 to 5.00 cm deep Mt 100 20.00 2000 

2 Earth Work 

Construction of earthen bund (dry of moist) excavation and laying in 15 cm layer, breaking 

160 

of clods, separating leaves and small stones, dressing and compaction with sheep foot roller 

or a) ordinary hand rammer, soil uptp 1.5 meter lift and 50 meter lead. 

Cum 160 41.00 6560 

b) hard soil Cum 160 96.00 15360 


Contingency (3 %) 196.80 

Supervision Charges (1.5 %] 98.40 


Grand Total 

Table No, 41.6, Cost of Farm pond in Village Wise:- 

(Rs.) 

Say 6900/- 

Sr No. Village Name Nos. Of Pond Cost 

1 Patan 7 56000 


3 Amrapar 10 80000 


Total 25 200000/- 

Plains or Flat level: 



These is at field level of farmers where farmers are operating at a very high labour intensive way. These generally field bunding , crop pattern alteration. 

The prime aim is to conserve the rain in the field 

Table No, 41.7 Technical Details of Farm Bund 

Particulars 

Value 

Bund Length Per Ha. 400 Mt. 

Proposed Area fare of farm) 1.00 Ha. 

Total Bund Length For Proposed Area(for whole project) 174500 Mt. 

Top Width 0.50 Mt. 

Side Slope 1.0 :0.75 

Height 1.0 Mt 

Base Width 2.0 Mt. 

Cross-Section of Farm bund 1.25 Sq Mt. 

Table No, 41.8, Quantity Excavation for Farm bund 

Sr. 

Description Unit Quantity 

No 


2 Earth Work 

Construction of earthen bund (dry of moist) excavation and laying in 15 cm layer, breaking of clods, separating leaves 

and small stones, dressing and compaction with sheep foot roller or hand rammer, uptp 1.5 meter lift and 50 meter 

lead. a) ordinary soil Cum 218125 

b) hard soil 


Sowing of seed on the constructed ridge Mt 174500 

4 Supply of Stylo/Dhaman Seed @ 4gm/mt in(single line) Kg 698 



Table No. 41.9 Cost Estimation of Farm Bund No.l 

Sr. No. Description Unit Quantity Rate Amount 


2 Earth Work 

Construction of earthen bund (dry of moist) excavation and laying in 15 cm layer, breaking Cum 

of clods, separating leaves and small stones, dressing and compaction with sheep foot roller 

or a) ordinary hand rammer, soil uptp 1.5 meter lift and 50 meter lead. 

Cum 218125 41.00 8943125 

b) hard soil 

3 Vegatative Work 

Sowing of seed on the constructed ridge Mt 174500 2.0 349000 

Supply of Stylo/Dhaman Seed @ 4gm/mt infsingle line) Kg 698 50 34900 

4 Sub Total 9327000 

5 Contigency (3 %) 279810 

6 Supervision Charges (1.5 %) 139905 


Grand Total 9746715 

Say 9746000/- 

Table No. 41.10 Cost Estimation of Farm Bund For Every Village 

Sr no. Village Farm Bund Length Cost 

1 Patan 70000 3920000 

2 Paradava 48000 2688000 

3 Amrapar 95000 5320000 

4 Malavada 10500 588000 

Total 174500 11956000/- 



41.11 Details of Forestry Plantation (Afforastration) 

Sr. No. Item of work Qty. Labour Material Total Remark 

1. Nursery 

a Cost of container, soil, manure, seed, water, 1333 0 2929 2929 

fertilizer, insecticide, rent of lands, shade etc. 

b Labour: preparation of beds, filling and 1333 2960 0 2960 

arranging of bags, sowing of seeds, watering, 

shifting, weeding etc. 

Total (a+b) 2960 2929 5889 

c Maintenance of seedling, watering, shifting 1333 2122 345 2467 

and grading insecticide harmones etc from 

April to July 

Total (a +b +c) 5082 3274 8356 

2. Area Development 

a Selection of site, survey and preparation 1111 155 0 155 

b cleaning of site 1111 426 0 426 

c Alignment & digging of pits (45 cm X45cm 

X45cm) 

1111 7511 0 7511 



Total of 2. 8092 0 8092 

3. Protection 

a Fencing by Barbed wire (600 Rmt/Ha) 1111 15000 60000 75000 

Total of 3 15000 60000 75000 

4. Current Year 

Planting and cultural Operation 

a Raising of seedling casulity @ 20% 222 493 488 981 

b Transport of seedling including casuality 1333 800 533 1333 

Replacement 

c Application of DAP 10 gm. pit and insecticide 1111 141 266 407 

before planting 

d Planting with Khamna 1111 2201 0 2201 

e First weeding cum soil working 1111 1889 0 1889 

f Second weeding cum soil working 1111 1444 0 1444 

g Third weeding cum soil working 1111 1778 0 1778 

h Fertilizer Support watering 4 times 1111 7999 13332 13332 

i Repairs of fence & fire protection 1111 3447 240 3687 

j Misellaneous (Signage, Photographs etc) 1111 0 500 500 


5. First year cultural operation 

a Maintenance of casulity seedlings for casulity 222 353 57 410 



@ 20% from April to july 

b Casulity replacement transport & planting 222 728 0 728 

c First weeding cum soil working 1111 1889 0 1889 

d Second weeding cum soil working 1111 1444 0 1444 

e fertilizer and support watering 3 times 1111 5999 4000 9999 

f watch and ward 1111 3447 240 3687 


6. Second year cultural operation 

a One weeding cum soil working 1111 1889 0 1889 

b Repairs of fence and fire protection 111 2487 0 2487 


Grant Total of 1 to 6 66602 74931 141533 

Village Wise Afforastration 

Sr. No Village Neme No. of Unit Per unit cost Total cost 

1 

Patan 

12 

141533 1698396 


3 Amrapar 3 141533 



Total 23 

707665 

424599 

424599 

3255259/-


Livelihood Intervention 

Production system -1: Potato wafers production 

Introduction: 

In Gujarat, Banaskatha, Vadodara, Kheda, Mehasana, Jamnagar and Kachha districts have good production of Potato crop. Now a days potato 

wafers become popular in cities as well as in rural areas. During the production season of potato it costs around Rs 5000 to 6000/- per tone. In this 

business raw material of potato and vegetative oil is most important products. 

Procedure for potato wafers: 

1. Raw material: Potato should be of same size, mostly round and it should not have any disease or any whole on it. Material must be neat 

2. and clean. 

3. Classification: Grading should be done by manually or by machine to get single type of disease less potato. 

4. Cleaning: As per need potato should be washed in running water to clean dust on it. 

5. Removal of upper surface: The upper surface may get remove by manually or by machine, it need to maintain proper and continuous 

pressure of water. Afeter this process potato should be sink in water having mixture of 0.1 % of Sodium sulfide or Sodium meta bisulfide 

for further procedure. 

6. Trimming: Once again material is to be scanned for removal of bad material by manually, it is known as trimming 

7. Slicing: Slice of potato is to be done by using slicer or striper or if man power is more then it may be done by local instrument also. 



8. Watering: After slice it should be washed 2 -3 times by clean water and then remove starch on it by putting it over …… 

9. Hydro Extraction : To remove extra amount of water, Hydro extraction of slice is to be done by putting it over cloths on open space. 

10. Frying: Hydro extracted and dry potato slices is to be fried in good vegetative oil 

Cost Estimation of Potato Wafers 



Sr. No. Item Number Cost 

1 Instruments 

Potato pilling machine with 1 HP single motor 1 15000 

potato wafer cutting machine with 1 hp single motor 1 18000 

Dehydrator machine with 1 hp single motor 1 20000 

Burner fiber (gas stove), valve bloar take pipe line along with all 1 20000 

accessory. 

Aluminum fipan (Tavi) 1 8000 

Weights 1 4000 

Electrification installation 4000 

Sealing machine for packing 1 5000 

Office furniture 10000 

Raw material of potato, vegetable oil, plastic bags for packing 30000 

Salary and power expenditure 6000 

Repair/maintenance 800 

Rent of building 1000 

Total 141200 

Total expenditure for one month: Rs 31800/- 

Total Production in one month: Use 100 kg raw material of potato it gives 25 kg wafer daily. So monthly production of wafers is 750 kg. 

Cost of wafer per kg is Rs 70/- So total selling cost of wafer= 750 X 70 = 52500/- 



Net profit = Total sell- total expenditure= 52500 – 31800 = 20700/-. 

Production System-2: Papad Making 

For women to become a successful entrepreneur, she needs access to capital, technical and managerial know-how and market. The essence to 

empower rural women lies in catalyzing appropriate economic activities at the grass root level and creating new opportunities for them to earn 

higher income in order ton improve their standard of living. This objective could be accomplished by establishing enterprises that are based on the 

locally available resources and preferably indigenous knowledge. Self Help Groups (SHG), each with 10-20 members, will be motivated and 

proper training will be provided for each micro enterprise activity which will improve the quality of their own lives as well as the lives of those 

around them. 

Introduction 

Papad is delicious snack. It is consumed at homes, restaurants, hotels, etc. Papad is a traditional item consumed in all functions. 

Traditionally this activity was confined to household papad making but in view of increasing demand and availability of machinery 

(mechanisation) it has now been developed in cottage and small scale sector. Enterprise can be started by 2 family members and optimum 

machinery. 

Market 

Field survey findings indicated that papad industry has good potential in big centers in cities like Gondal and Jetpur of Rajkot areas. There 

is a good demand for papads because it is a food product and commonly consumed commodity in all households and hotels. Women entrepreneurs 

can gainfully take up this papad/Khakhra unit in their houses but proper packing and distribution network is necessary to sell in bulk quantities. 

Manufacturing Process 

Generally weighed quantity of floor is taken in a mixer. A solution of common salt and carbonates is added in requisite quantity of water 

and the contents are kneaded at maximum speed to get a homogenous lump of the dough. After resting the dough for 30 minutes, it is divided into 

balls. These are pressed into circular discs. Corn starch can be used as dusting material to prevent stickiness. The papads are usually dried. After 

drying, it is packed in various size packing. Lot of 25 or 50 papads is then packed in polythene bags. Papad can be manufactured from different 



varieties of pulses or there could be a combination of pulses as well. Ingredients required for Papad making are Black gram, oil, sodium carbonate, 

flour of Arhar dal. 



Process flow chart of Papad making 

Dough formation from various ingredients 

Making small balls from dough 

Pressing 

Sun Drying 

Sealing and Packing 



Production Capacity 

Monthly approximately 1000 Kg papad/khakhra and other foods product activity can be produced. 

Static Capital Investments: 

A) Land/Infrastructure : 

A person can start his activity in his own house by using Approx. 575 Sq. Ft. carpet area. 

Sr. 

Particular Nos. Price (Rs.) 

No. 

B) Plant/Machinery/Instruments etc. 

1 Flour Mill with electric motor 1 60000.00 

2 Set for foods product making 35000.00 

3 Other instruments 15000.00 

4 Installation, foundation etc. 15000.00 

Total : - 125000.00 

C) Office Furniture etc. 

1 Cup board/kitchen stand 10000.00 

kitchen wares and gas connection other etc. 25000.00 

D) Capital Investment 

Raw Material 15000.00 

marketing and exposure visite and related activity 15000.00 

Total : -(C+D) 65000.00 

Grand Total :- (B+D) 190000.00 

E) Transport to food product / marketing /vehicles other etc 150000.00 

Production Cost (Monthly) 

1 Raw Material 50000.00 

2 Power fuel charge 4000.00 

3 Packing 15000.00 

4 Maintenance & Storage etc. 3000.00 

5 House Rent 500.00 

6 Others 5500.00 



Total : - 68000.00 

Total Production (Monthly) 

1. Papad 1000 Kg X Rs. 90/Kg 90000 

Cost Benefit Ratio (Monthly) 

Monthly Selling income 90000 

Production Cost 68000 

------------ 

Total monthly income will be Rs. 22000 /- 22000 

The unit can be taken up by landless, small farmer and land with limited farm labour, thus making it most suitable to the project villages, and the 

scheme will be taken up in such a manner that there should be no marketing problem, as they will be consumed directly by the near by villages or 

cities. Training will be provided to the beneficiaries and the content is shown below 

Training Content 

A. Theoretical 

• Introduction to different types of papad / khakhra and other food.. 

• Tools and Equipments used in papad / khakhra and other food.. 

• Dough making - variations in shapes, size, and flavour. 

• The processes involved in papads / khakhra and other food.. 

• The hygiene aspects associated with food products. 

• Market development. 

• Addresses of the suppliers of raw materials, & packaging materials. 



B. Practical 

• Raw materials for papad / khakhra and other food.. – the quality and variety. 

• Introduction to the machinery and equipments used.• Dough making and the value addition in the form of flavours. 

• Bringing about variations in shapes and sizes. 

• Papad & Chips making – Practical 

• Drying and preservation 

• Cost considerations and waste reduction. 

• Pricing & packaging 

Production System-3: Chilly powder packing 

Introduction: 

Gujarat state is the second largest state in the production of chilly, 14 districts of Gujarat produces chilly thus raw material will be readily 

available for the proposed unit. The production of spices is likely to increase in the coming years with irrigation facility made available through 

Narmada Canal System. 

Sr. No. Item Number/Quantity Cost 

1 Micro Pulverizer along with electric motor 1 70000 

2 Electric breaker with motor 2 25000 

3 Sealing machine 1 2500 

4 Weighing balance 1 2000 

5 Furniture 8000 



6 Raw Material (Dry Chilly) 600 kg/month 50000 

7 Salary 2 employ 3000 

8 Electrification 1500 

9 Repairing/ Maintenance 1000 

Total 163000/- 

Revenue and return details: 

Sr. Return Details 

Cost 

No. 

1 Total cost for Chilly powder 163000/- 

2 Monthly Material requirement and labour charges (600 kg) 50000 

3 Labour charges 2000 

3 Net selling price (Rs 130/- per Kg ) 78000/- 

4 Net profit 26000/- 

Production System-4: Groundnut, Horse gram, Poha preparation 

Introduction: 

Now a days Groundnut, Horse gram become a regular snacks thing 

Sr. No. Item Number Cost 

1 Electric Bloor with chimney (10 HP) 1 20000 

2 Bhatti 1 2000 



3 Iron pot (Can) 2 2500 

4 Other pots 10000 

5 Weighing Balance 1 2500 

6 Electrification 2000 

7 Raw Material (Horsegram, Groundnut, Poha) 200 Kg 14000 

8 Packing 750 

9 Salary 2 2000 

10 Repairing/Mentenance 600 

Total 59350 

Say 60000/- 


Sr. No. Return Details Cost 

1 Total cost for Groundnut, Horse gram preparation 60000 

2 Monthly Material requirement and labour charges (200 kg) 14000 


4 Monthly maintenance, fuel charge 1000 

5 Net selling price (Rs 110/- per Kg ) 22000 

6 Net profit 5000/- 



Production System-: Washing soap and detergent powder 

Introduction: 

Washing soap and detergent powder is the used every house daily. The raw material of washing soap and detergent powder comes from acid 

slurry of petroleum products such as C. M. C. acid slurry, sodium silicate etc. Day to day use of synthetic clothes are getting increasing due to this 

the use of detergent powder is also increasing. 

Production capacity: 

The production of washing soap may ranges around 100 kg/day and that of detergent powder is around 70 kg/day. 


1 Soap making machine 1 12500 

2 Soap cutting machine 1 3500 

3 Different types of mould 4 5000 

4 Iron pan having capacity of 150 kg 2 7000 

5 weighing balance 1 4000 

6 Iron plates, bowls, tray, plastic tub, etc 1 6500 

7 Detergent powder machine 1 17000 



8 Oven 1 5000 

9 Raw material, costic soda, sodium silicate, acid slurry, sodium sulphate, 

45000 

colour, sent, electric expenditure etc 

Total 105500/- 



1 Raw material 30000 


3 electric bill 350 

4 Packing 800 

5 Depreciation cost 450 

6 Sub total 34600/- 

7 cost of 2500 kg Washing soap with Rs 11 per Kg 27000 

8 Cost of 1700 kg detergent powder with Rs 9 per Kg 15300 

9 Total Income 42300/- 

10 Net profit (9-6) 7700/- 

Production System-: Stitching and Bharat work 

Introduction 




1 Bharat work machine with electric motor 1 12500 

2 Niting macine with design book 1 10000 

3 Table, chair and show case cupboard 6500 

4 Raw material such as threats, rill etc and electric bill 6000 

5 Repair, maintenance 250 

6 Labour charges (3-4) 6000 

Total 43250 



1 Raw material 6000 


3 electric bill 250 


6 Sub total 12400/- 

7 cost of selling from Bharat work item 390 X 30 9750 

8 Cost of selling from other cloths like sweter 200 X 25 5000 

9 Total Income 14750/- 

10 Net profit (9-6) 2350/- 



Production System-: Mandap and Sound Service for Patan Project 

Introduction: 

Now a days Mandap and Sound service is mostly useful for marrage, any festival or for political events. It gives the facility like sitting and comfort 

for people at such events. To start such business there is no need of training but it requires enough space for storage. Regarding this business, 

there is no need of approval from government. 


1 Bamboos 300 15000 

2 Cotton cloths to tie on floor (20X30) 600 sq. m. 20000 

3 Jute carpet on ground 600 sq. m. 8900 

4 Bed, pillow, bed sheet 50 pairs 25000 

5 Wedding decorated set 1 set 7500 

6 Wedding chair 1 set 4000 

7 Folding ladder 2 1800 

8 Hand operated cart 1 5000 

9 Tube lights 40 Nos. 8000 

10 Decorative light 4500 

11 ceiling and pedestal fan 10 10000 

12 Total 109700 





1 Labour charge for service 2000 

2 Transportation charge 500 


5 Repair and maintenance 500 

6 Sub Total Expenditure for 1 month 3600 

7 Monthly gross income 12000 

8 Monthly Net income (7-6) 8400/- 

Production System-: Paper Dish making 

Paper dish are biodegradable, human friendly, free from pest and can be made without using any chemicals. These plates can be used for having 

all type of food such as hot, cod or wet. These plates are useful during picnic, festival, marriage or any other such type of events. In the modern life 

atmosphere, paper plates act as the important item and is ideal in use for parties and functions. 


1 Foot operated machine 2 22000 

2 Hand operated machine 2 18000 

3 Wooden Table 2 2500 

4 Different types and shape Moulds 6 6000 

5 Rack (wooden/still) 1 3500 

6 Raw material (vegetable, plastic, ) 20000 



7 Salary (2 labour) 4000 

8 Total 76000 


1 raw material 20000 

2 Salary 4000 

3 Power expenditure 800 

4 Packing 400 


6 Repairing and maintenance 300 

7 Total Expenditure for 1 month 25900/- 

8 Production of plate (@ 2000 plate daily with Rs 0.75 per plate) 37500/- 

9 Monthly Net income (8-7) 11600/- 

Production System-: Fodder bank for Patan Watershed 

Introduction: 

"The fodder bank technology is a farming practice whereby leguminous shrubs and grass species are grown on a farm to provide fodder for 

livestock sector." It provides a wide range of animal products that are rich in high quality proteins and have the potential as good and sustainable 

sources of income in many areas. However, lack of fodder in terms of quality and quantity, is one of the major constraints towards the low 

productivity of cattle in Patan watershed Project. 

The fodder bank ensures fodder availability which in turn reduces the distressed migration of the people resulting in sustainable livelihood 

opportunities and enhances natural resource security in the project area. 



Objective of a fodder bank: 

1. Build a local fodder bank and organize the distribution of fodder during drought and scarce situation. . 

2. Establish and maintain village fodder farm in the community grazing area, and allocate the community land for fodder production, in 

association with dairy co-operatives. 

3. Control regulates and charge in the community grazing and pastures lands. 

4. Undertake the distribution of fodder seeds and slips in the village. 

Primary problem of the project 

Vinjalpar village comes under totally rainfed agriculture because of this migration percentage is very high. Soil is very suitable for fodder crop 

mainly sorghum but due the scarcity of irrigation water only one crop can be taken throughout the year. So fodder bank play an important role to 

solve this problem. Majority of farmers own less than 2.5ha of land for food and fodder production but lack of irrigation water has made these 

lands unproductive. The concept of fodder bank can overcome the problem of seasonal feed shortage, migration and poor animal performance. A 

It is the milch animal, which is the worst affected during these periods of drought, due to lack of productivity of sufficient fodder and water. As a 

result, the poor are forced to let go with their animals in search of fodder and green pastures to other parts of the state. This eventually this leads 

to colossal loss of income generating assets, poor demographic profile of village and low education level of their 

children. 

Even in good years, during the harvesting season, the poor tend to sell their crop residue or fodder to earn cash. At such time when supply is 

higher than demand, they are not able to sell fodder at remunerative prices. The same fodder is bought back by them, mostly at higher prices 

during the months of scarcity. 

To meet the critical needs of fodder, especially for the poor families and protect them from inordinately high prices during the summer months, 

fodder banks are proposed to be setup at the village level 

Feasibility of Fodder Bank: 



A detailed survey and Focused Group Discussion was conducted in Vinjalpar watershed area. The number and type of cattle as well as the fodder 

production capacity of the village was collect during these surveys. In focused group discussion several factors like the various types of fodder 

available locally, the quantity of fodder to be stored in the fodder bank, the size of fodder bank, the amount of finances required to operate a 

fodder bank etc were discussed with the farmers, User group and Watershed committee. The fodder bank should be sustainable and towards that, 

the sale price of fodder should cover operating costs and losses in storage. All these decisions were taken jointly with the member of operating 

fodder bank. 

Primary Model for A Fodder Bank 

A 

Total Dairy farmers 70 

No. of adult animals 

Calf 

No. of Cattle to be catered by one fodder bank. 

No. 

100 

of calves 

50 

Total Cattle 

Total 

Fodder requirement per day [10 kg dry fodder for adult and 4kg for 

calf.] 

Fodder requirement for 180 days. 

Fodder come from community land 

Cost of cultivation for fodder production (See table:2) 

Remaining requirement for 120 days Total Cost Avg. procurement 

150 

1000 kg for adult and 200 kg for calf 

Total 1200 kg per day. 

2160 Quintal 

5Ha * 200 (Qt. per Ha)=1000 quintal 

23,000 Rs 

2700-2250=450 quintal 



rate in harvesting season, Rs.600 per Qt. including transportation 

*.' 

Net Cost of Fodder Production "K' (cost of cultivation + Cost of 

procurement) 

600*450= Rs.2,70,000/-3,40,000 

B. Area development for fodder bank Land required Approx. 3000 m 2 Rs7200 

(preferably land will be allotted by Gram Panchayat @ Rs.600 per 

month) 

c. Cl. Fencing + Weighing machine + Small shed + Other tools. Rs.50,000/- 

D. Total Cost for Fodder bank (A+B) Rs. 3,47,200/- 

Cost of cultivation for fodder production 

Cost Detail 

Unit cost 

1. Cost for tillage 4.5 hour*5 hec*400 Rs=9000 Rs 

2. Cost for seed 12 kg seed *5 hec *150= 9000 Rs 

3. Cost for fertilizer 3500 Rs 

4. Cost for irrigation 2,000 Rs 

5. Depreciation cost of Cl. (20%) 3,000 Rs 

Total cost for 5 hec Rs. 23500/- 

Revenue and return Details. 

S. No Return Details Cost (in Rs.) 

1 Cost of fodder Per Kg = 3,47,200/270000 



1.28 Rs/kg 

2. Selling Price of Fodder Rs 2 /Kg 

3. Net selling Price Rs. 5,40,000 

4. Net Profit Rs 1,92,800 

Production of Fodder: 

We will produce 2250 quintal fodder from community land of Gram Panchayat and for remaining requirement we can fulfill by two 

ways first one buy the fodder at the time of harvesting and second we can take land on lease agreement from some other government as 

well as private agency. 

Technical Support/Assistance: 

To ensure proper technical support for fodder bank and smooth functioning of activities the required technical assistance may be taken from 

Krishi Vigyan Kendra (KVK), Dept. of Agriculture, Dairy and DWDU. 

Advantages: 

The importance of a fodder bank can be well understood. The fodder banks will provide much needed relief and self-reliance to poor in 

the village especially in drought condition. Specifically, the advantages are:- 

> It will reduce migration during drought condition. 

> Farmers can purchase and sale of fodder at village level, thus doing away with costs incurred by them to carry out these 

transactions at the city market. 

> It can reduce in overall market prices of fodder during the lean season. 

> Ensure availability of fodder during the lean season at affordable and reasonable prices. 

> Reduced distress sale of cattle due to non -availability and / or non-affordability of fodder. 

> Higher incomes for the poor as cattle will have enough fodder even during the lean season 



> Increase employment opportunities at the village level associated with the sale, purchase and storage of fodder. 

Model for a Vermi-compost Unit 

S. No Particulars Quantity Rate (Rs.) Amount (Rs.) 

1 Precast Concrete Pillars (4 m long) 12 400 4800 

2 Bamboo frame angle for shade (4 m) 20 45 per meter 3600 

Bamboo battles frame work for shade LS 2000 

3 Shade net (100 per cent) for covering the roof 40 sq.m 50 2000 

4 Binding wire for tying 20 Kg 50 1000 

5 Labour charges for erection of sheds 10 100 1000 

6 Shovels, spades, crowbars, iron baskets, LS 2500 

7 Weighing B (100 kg capacity) 1 1500 1500 

8 Cow dung @ 80kg/m3 400 3 1200 

9 Worms @ 350 per m3 500 worms per kg 8 kg 200 1600 

10 Formation of vermin bed with agro-waste, cow dung and worms 10.8 m3 40 432 

11 Miscellaneous 1000 

Total cost 22,632 

Returns from vermicomposting 

Benefits 

1. Sale of vermin compost of 7 tones @ Rs.3000/- per ton 7*3000=21000 Rs 



2. Sale of worms @ 5 kg per ton of compost and Rs. 50 per kg 35*50=1750 Rs 

S.Total 

22750 Rs/- 

vermicompost preparation cost 

6732 Rs/- 

Net profit 

16018 Rs/- 

Total Vermicompost Unit for Patan Project 

Sr. No Village Name No. of Unit Per unit cost Total cost 

1 Patan 10 22632 226320 

2 

Paradava 

2 22632 45264 

3 

4 

Amrapar 

Malavada 

5 22632 113160 

5 22632 113160 

Total 497904/- 



Production System - 5 : Vermicomposting unit 

Introduction: 

The process of composting crop residues using earthworms comprise spreading the agricultural wastes and cow dung in layers as 

1.5 m wide and 0.9 m high beds of required length. Earthworms are introduced in between the layers @ 350 worms per m 3 of bed 

volume. The beds are maintained at about 40 - 50% moisture content and a temperature of 20 - 30° C by sprinkling water over the 

beds. The earthworms being voracious eaters consume the biodegradable matter and give out a part of the matter as excreta or 

vermi-castings. The vermi-casting containing nutrients are rich manure for the plants. 

About The Worms 

Eisenia fetida, Eudrilus eugeniae, and Perionyx excavatius are some of the species for rearing to convert organic wastes into manure. The 

worms feed on any biodegradable matter ranging from coir waste to kitchen garbage and Vermicomposting units are ideally suited to locations / 

units with generation of considerable quantities of organic wastes. One earthworm reaching reproductive age of about six weeks lays one egg 

capsule (containing 7 embryos) every 7 - 10 days. Three to seven worms emerge out of each capsule. Thus, the multiplication of worms under 

optimum growth conditions is very fast. The worms live for about 2 years. Fully grown worms could be separated and dried in an oven to make 

'worm meal' which is a rich source of protein (70%) for use in animal feed. 

Location 

Patan Project has lots of animals so it can become good vermi compost center as well as good source of livelihood. Vermicompost is 

very suitable for fruit, flower and vegetable as well as cereal crops. It increases quality and quantity of product in per unit area. 



Use 

Put lack irrigation arid desert so chemical is not advisable so to increate nutritive value of soil and available farmyard manure Vermi 

compost has more nutrient compare to other manures and fertilizer so by the use of vermi compost we can reduce use of chemical fertilizer. 

Vermi compost not only supply nutrient but also improve quantity of hormones for plant growth, improves the soil structure leading to 

increase in water and nutrient holding capacities of soil. 

Components of A Commercial Unit 

Sheds 

Shed should be at such place so that it will be protected from both heat and rain water. Shed should be atleast 3 m wide and 10 m 

length. We can make it by the use of precast concrete pillars as it is available in the market so it reduces the cost and time. It will prevent 

wetting of beds due to rain on a windy day. 

Vermi-beds 

Scientific bed side is 75 cm - 90 cm thick depending on the provision of filter for drainage of excess water. The whole bed area should 

be above the ground. The bed should have a uniform height over the entire width to the extent possible to avoid low production owing to low 

bed volumes. The proper bed width should not be more that 1.5 m to allow easy access to the centre of the bed. And bed length should be 8 m 

and 1 m height. 

Land 

About 30 square meter of land will be required to set up a vermin compost production unit. It should have a good watering arrangement 

and other equipments as required because moisture is very essential for vermin compost production. Site selection should be such that it is already 

near or under greenery so that it helps in maintaining the moisture. We can take land from Gram panchayat and it can be taken on lease of at least 

10-15 years. 

Seed Stock 



This is very important thing because worms multiply at the rate of 350 worms per m 3 of bed space over a period of 6 month to a year. 

Fencing 

The entire area has to be fenced to prevent the animals and other unwanted elements. These could be estimated based on the length 

of the periphery of the farm. 

Water Supply System 

We have to maintain always 50-60 % moisture content, there is need to plan for a water source, lifting mechanism and a system of 

conveying and applying the water to the vermi-beds. Initially for 10 days water should be applied regularly by manually to maintain the required 

moisture percentage. 

Machinery 

Farm machinery and implements are required for cutting the raw material in small pieces, conveying shredded raw material to the 

vermi-sheds, loading, unloading, collection of compost, loosening of beds for aeration, shifting of the compost. Costs of providing necessary 

implements and the machinery have to be included in the project cost. 

Table no.43: Details of activities in the CPRs in the project areas 

Target 

Name(s) of the 

CPR particulars Activity proposed Target area under Estimated Expected no. of 

villages 

S. No 

the activity (ha) expenditure (Rs.) beneficiaries 

Patan Waste land Afforestation 12 16.98 96 

Community Waste land Fodder 17 12.68 45 

Community Pasture land Horticulture 3 1.68 20 

Total for Village 48 52.14 161 

Paradava Waste land Afforestation 5 7.07 88 

Waste land Fodder 5 3.73 85 

Waste land Horticulture 2 1.12 42 




Amrapar Afforestation 3 4.24 95 

Fodder 10 7.46 26 

Horticulture 3 1.68 56 


Malavada Afforestation 3 4.24 96 

Fodder 5 3.73 44 

Horticulture 1 0.56 16 


Table No. 45, Summary of Soil and water conservation Structures and activity 

S. No Measure Unit/Length (Rm) Net Expense Convergence Statergy 

1 Staggered Contour Trenching / Stone Bunding 275 Ha 3437500 Forest 

2 Waste vier 706 Nos. 9531000 NREGS 

3 Check Dam 52 Nos. 15993700 NREGS 

4 Cause Way 14 Nos. 7788000 NREGS 

5 Earthen bund 13765 rmt 3031688 NREGS 

6 Farm Pond 25 4200000 NREGS 

7 Farm bund 223500 rmt 9156000 NREGS 

8 Horticulture plantation( in Ha) 9 Ha 504000 NREGS 

9 Afforestration( in Ha.) 23 Ha 10578198 Forest 

Total 64220086/- 



Table no. :46, Details of activities of preparatory phase (AH financial figures in lakh Rs.) 

Sr. Name of villages 

No. 

1 Patan, Paradava , 

Amrapar, 

Malavada 

Initiation of 

village level 

Capacity 

building 

IEC activities Baseline 

survey 

institution WC KVK Wall Painting House Hold 

SHG 

Agril. 

university 

Bill boards 

survey 

Socio-Econo 

mic Mapping 

Hydro-geological 

survey 

Identifying 

technical support 

Topographic Map agencies BISAG 

Soil Testing 

Soil testing 

lab,Gandhinagar 

UG Farm Demo Agri Info Sources of water Gram Panchayat 

Climatic Details IMD 

Any other 

(please specify) 

Capacity Building 

Capacity building is a process to strengthen the abilities of people, organizations and systems to make effective and efficient use of resources in 

order to make achieve their own goals on a sustainable basis. Capacity development is the process whereby individuals, groups, and organizations 

enhance their abilities to mobilize and use resources in order to achieve their objectives on a sustainable basis. Efforts to strengthen abilities of 

individuals, groups, and organizations can comprise a combination of (i) human skills development; (ii) changes in organizations and networks; 

and (iii) changes in governance/institutional context. Capacity building is a complex notion – it involves individual and organizational learning 

which builds social capital and trust, develops knowledge, skills and attitudes and when successful creates an organizational culture which enables 

organizations to set objectives, achieve results, solve problems and create adaptive procedures which enable it to survive in the long term. 

Scope of capacity building at Patan Project Area 

 

 

 

Income Generation Activities 

Vermicompost 

Patch work/Stiching 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Nursary raising 

Post Harvest management practices Fodder development and Management Afforestration 

Gram Vatika 

Crop Information 

Meteorological Information 

Alternative Land Use Plan 

Improved and Scientific agriculture practices 

Scientific technique of Soil and Moisture conservation 

Information dissemination on Audio/Video 

Dairy Development and Management 

Rural Craft 

Table no.: 47, Institutes Identified for Capacity Building 

S.r. No Organisation Training Given 

1 Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Airforce, Jamnagar Training in modern and scientific agriculture practices 

2 Junagadh Agricultural University Training in modern and better agriculture practices 

3 Community Mobilization & Capacity Building in Desert 

4 Research Foundation, Department of Forest, Gandhi Nagar Training on Nursery Development and Afforestation 

Areas 

5 International Centre for Entrepreneurship & Career 

Activities 

Livelihood activities and small business in rural ares. 

Development, Ahmedabad 



CHAPTER - 5 

BUDGETING 



Budgeting 

(*Detailed Budgeting has to be done at the PIA level table no. 

Budget Component 

% of the Budget 

Net Project Cost 100 1090.75 

-Administrative Costs 10 109.07 

-Monitoring 1 10.90 

-Evaluation 1 10.90 

Preparatory phase: 

-Entry point activities 4 43.63 

-Institution and capacity building 5 545.37 

-Detailed Project Report (DPR) 1 10.90 

Watershed Works Phase: 

-Watershed Development works, 50 54.53 

-Livelihood activities for the asset less persons, 10 109.07 

-Production system and micro enterprises 13 141.79 

Consolidation Phase 5 54.53 

Total 100 1090.75 

Table no. 48: Village wise- component wise budget available under IWMP 

Sl 

no 

Village 

EPA 

Institution 

and CB 

DPR 

Watershed 

development 

Work 

Activity 

Livelihood 

for asset 

less 

Production 

system and 

Microenterprises 

Consolidation Total 

1 Patan 16.27 20.34 4.06 203.45 52.89 40.69 20.34 358.04 



2 Paradava 8.99 11.23 2.24 112.38 29.22 22.47 11.23 197.76 

3 Amrapar 13.67 17.09 3.41 170.95 44.44 34.19 17.09 300.84 

4 Malavada 4.68 5.85 1.17 58.57 15.22 11.71 5.85 103.05 

Table no. 49: Village wise gap in funds requirement 

Sl No Village Total cost requirement Total funds 

available under 

IWMP 

Gap in funds 

requirement 

1 Patan 410.33 406.91 3.42 

2 Paradava 264.95 224.77 40.17 

3 Amrapar 402.17 341.91 60.26 

4 Malavada 127.14 117.14 10.00 

Total 1204.59 1090.73 113.85 

Table no.49.1: Details of Convergence of IWMP with other Schemes 

S. No. Village Activity to be carried out 

1 

2 

Patan 

Paradava 


Fund made available 

to IWMP due to 

convergence (Rs. in 

lakh) 

Reference no. of 

activity/ task/ structure 

in DPR 

Level at which 

decision for 

convergence was 

taken 

Afforestation 1.0 Forest PIA Level 

Farm bunding 1.0 NREGA Dist level 

Check Dam 0.92 NREGA Dist level 

Staggered contour Trenches 0.50 Forest PIA Level 


Farm bunding 10.0 NREGA Dist level 



Check Dam Cum Causeway 1.17 NREGA Dist level


3 


Amrapar Farm bunding 15.0 NREGA Dist level 



Check Dam Cum Causeway 15.0 NREGA Dist level 


4 Malavada Farm bunding 4.0 NREGA Dist level 



Check Dam Cum Causeway 0.90 NREGA Dist level 

Total 113.85 

Table no.50: Details of Convergence of IWMP with other Schemes 

SR. NO. 


Fund made 

Was this fund 

Name of activity /task/structure 

Level at which 

Departments with 

available to IWMP 

included in 

undertaken with converged funds 

decision for 

Schemes 

due to convergence 

Rs.15,000/ 

convergence was 

converging with 

IWMP 

(Rs. in lakh) 

15,000 Yes per No ha. (a) Structures (b) livelihoods (c ) 

Any other (pi. specify) 

taken 

1 NREGA 

75.29 Yes Yes No Structures 

Forest n 

37.56 Yes No Structures 



CHAPTER - 6 

EXPECTED 



Expected Outcomes 

Employment 

Employment has always been a problem in the village. The principal occupations of the people are dry land agriculture, animal husbandry and 

casual labour work. However, rain fall being very limited and erratic, agriculture suffers, i.e. at best they can take only a single crop, which keeps 

them partially engaged for about 4 months. Lack of fodder makes animal husbandry very difficult too. So, animal husbandry does not keep them 

engaged full time. Thus the people mainly depend upon casual labour, either in the village itself or outside it. 

The project plans for creation of both wage employment and self employment opportunities. Wage employment would be created by engaging 

people in watershed physical works like construction of earthen bunds, farm bunds, village pond, plantation, etc. Self employment would be 

created by providing the people with cash support in the form of direct livelihood activities like agriculture, animal husbandry and enterprise 

development. 

Table no. 52: Employment in Project area 

sr. 


Wage employment 

Self employment 

No. of mandays 

Villages 

No. of beneficiaries 

No. of beneficiaries 

NO. 

SC ST Others Women Total SC ST Others Women Total SC ST Others Women Total 

1 Patan 7625 0 74085 45120 85728 125 0 1215 705 1340 25 0 243 161 268 

2 

No. of mandays 

Paradava 10065 0 33855 24253 46080 165 0 555 379 720 33 0 111 86 144 

SC 

3 Amrapar 9882 3477 59079 40000 76000 162 57 969 625 1188 32 29 194 153 255 

4 Malvada 3904 1098 5612 5861 11136 64 18 92 92 174 13 9 18 24 40 



Migration 

Low rainfall results in very little fodder availability in the locality. The relatively well off farmers bring fodder from Mehsana (approximately 300 

kms away] collectively; but the resource poor cannot afford it. On account of agriculture and animal husbandry providing only part time 

employment for some part of the year, the people migrate for a better half of the year for wage labour. 

Employment opportunities in the local area as mentioned above will ensure lessening seasonal migration from the area. 

Table no. 53, Details of seasonal migration from Project area 

SR No. Names of villages No. of persons migrating No. of days per year of migration 

Pre-project Expected post project Pre-project Expected post project 

1 Patan 896 90 180 00 

Paradava 275 27 90 00 

Amrapar 100 10 60 00 

Malavada 60 6 180 00 

Ground water table 

Rainfall has been scanty but demand for ground water has been increasing all the time. The ground water table thus has depleted over 

the years. Presently it stands at 35 mt. 

Proper water harvesting structures and percolation-tanks wotttd-go a long way in increastng-watertable depth from-2frmHrrtfae-pri 

Project level to 34 mt in the post project period. 

Table no. 53: Details of average ground water table depth in the project areas (in meters) 

Sr. No. Names of Villages Sources Pre-Project level Expected Increase/ decrease (Post- Project) 

1 Patan Open wells 35 34.70 

NA 

NA 

- - 


Bore wells 

Others (specify)


Drinking water 

Patan and Amrapar villages have water tank for drinking water but due to deficiency of water in summer season people faces problem of 

drinking water for tow months. Other villages have well for drinking purpose but the same problem arrives in summer season so if the 

watershed development project get implemented with proper planning and management, then such type of problem can finished forever. 

As a result of the watershed activities, it is expected that the quantity and quality of drinking water would improve. 

Table no. 54: Status of Drinking water 

s. 

Names of Availability of drinking water (no. of months in a year) Quality of drinking water Comments 

No. 

Villages 

Pre-project Expected Post project Pre-project Expected Post-project 

1 Patan 9 12 Saline with Potable 

highTDS 

Crops 

Agriculture primarily depends upon water; but this is what is lacking in Patan village. The surface water is scanty due to low rainfall and 

Ground water is saline, which is unfit for crop production. 

All this can change with the integrated land and water management during the watershed project. The planned earthen bunds would prevent the saline 

water from the Rann of Kutch to mix with the sweet rain water and also help percolate sweet water underground, and preserve some moisture in the soil. 

This will help in additional area coming under cultivation and increasing productivity too. The farmers can take more than one season of crops. 

Different varieties of crops can be taken.hg 



Table no. 55: Details of crop area and yield in the project areas 

Name of village 

Patan 

Paradava 

Amrapar 

Malavada 

Pre-project 

Expected Post-project 

Name of crops 

Average Yield (Kg) per ha. Area (ha) Average Yield per ha 

(Kg) 

Area (ha) 

Kharif 

Cotton 800.30 Ha 2250 Kg 800.30 Ha 2600 Kg 

Ground Nut 308.50 Ha 1375 Kg 308.50 Ha 1600 Kg 

Bajara 20.0 2150 Kg 20.0 2300 Kg 

Rabi 

Wheat 

30.20 Ha 3750 Kg 30.20 Ha 3850 Kg 

Jira 

20.60 Ha 500 Kg 20.60 Ha 700 Kg 

Castor 

Cumin Kharif 



Bajara 38.90 Ha 2050 Kg 38.90 Ha 2200 Kg 

Rabi 

Wheat 

45.20 Ha 3450 Kg 45.20 Ha 3750 Kg 

Castor 

Jira 

15.80 Ha 495 Kg 15.80 Ha 600 Kg 

Cumin Kharif 



Bajara 245.10 Ha 2350 Kg 245.10 Ha 2700 Kg 

Castel(Arnda) 74.50 Ha 2250 Kg 74.50 Ha 2600 Kg 

Rabi 

Wheat 

125.0 Ha 3650 Kg 125.0 Ha 3750 Kg 

Castor 

Jira 

103.0 Ha 550 Kg 103.0 Ha 600 Kg 

Cumin Kharif 





Horticulture 

Table no. 56: Area under horticulture 

Sr. No. Name of Village Existing area under horticulture (ha) Area under horticulture proposed to be covered 

Vegetative cover 

through IWMP 

Patan 2 16 

There is negligible area under tree cover. The village has a forest area of 524 ha which consists of only Juliflora Prosopis [ganda babool). 

Trees like Neem and _Alianthus_are seen just here and there, not concentrated in any area. 

It is planned that 15 ha land to be covered under new plantation. 

Table no. 57: Forest/vegetative cover 

Sr. No. Name of Village Existing area under tree cover (ha) Area under tree cover proposed(Ha) 

1 Malavada 39.40 6 

Livestock 

The village has quite a good of livestock population. These include cows, bullocks, buffaloes, goats, sheep and camels. The interventions like 

provision of good quality cows and buffaloes, the establishment of a fodder bank and other such related activities would spur up the dairy 

development in the village. It is expected that the post project period would see a substantial increase in livestock population and yield from them. 

Table no. 58: Details of livestock in the project areas (for fluids please mention in litres, for solids please mention in kgs. and 



income in Rs.) 

Sr. No. Name of Village Type of Animal Pre-Project Expected Post-project Remarks 

Patan 

1 

Paradava 

Amrapar 

Malavada 

Linkages 

Milch-animals 

Buffalo 

Cow 

Goat 

Milch-animals 

Cowfper Buffalofper animal/day) animal/day) 

Cow 

Draught 

Goat 

Purpose animals 

Milch-animals 


Cow 

Draught 

Goat 


Milch-animals 


Cow 

Draught 

Goat 


No. Yield(Liter 

Per day) 

Income No. Yield(Liter Income 

Per day) 

1134 6804 163296 1800 12600 352800 

774 3096 68112 1000 2200 55000 

No. 130 260 3900 200 600 12000 

250 1500 37500 350 2450 73500 

151 604 13288 200 1200 33600 

301 604 9060 500 1500 25000 

386 2316 57900 400 2800 78400 

114 456 10032 300 1200 30000 

75 150 2250 200 600 12000 

1337 8022 176484 1500 10500 294000 

172 688 13760 300 1500 37500 

76 152 2280 200 600 12000 


The direct livelihood activities need good forward and backward support. Without such support system the activities may fail to deliver the 

desired results. These linkages Draught would Purpose involve animals credit, machinery, input supply, marketing, etc. 

Table no. 59: Backward-Forward linkages 

Sr. No. Project Type of Marketing Facility Pre-project (no.) During the project (no.) Post-project (no.) 



1 Patan 

Backward linkages 

Seed certification 

Seed supply system 1 1 

Fertilizer supply system 1 1 

Pesticide supply system 

l_ Credit institutions - - - 

Water supply 1 1 

Extension services 

Nurseries 3 3 

Tools/machinery suppliers - 1 1 

Price Support system 

Labour 

Any other (please specify) 

Forward linkages 

Harvesting/threshing machinery 

Storage (including cold storage) 

Road network 

Transport facilities 

Markets / Mandis 

Collective marketing Collective marketing 

Agro and other Industries 

system 

Cumin 

processing/packaging-1 

system 

1 

Milk and other collection centres Milk collection centre-1 1 

Labour 

Any other (please specify) Fodder bank-4 4 

Vermi-compost unit-4 4 

Animal vitamins (50 It) Animal vitamins (100 

It) 



CHAPTER - 7 

QUALITY AND SUSTAINABILITY ISSUES 



Quality and Sustainability Issues 

Plans for Monitoring and Evaluation 

A Web-based CIS System is being developed for monitoring and Evaluatting the project in its planning & implementation phases. 

The system would be available on a public domain and can be accessed by all the stakeholders of the project. The system shows the 

entire state of Gujarat and all of those areas selected over the next 18 years. Filtering allows the user to zoom onto one particular 

project. Details related to soil type, Land-use classification, inhabitation etc., can be obtained village-wise. Furthermore, survey-number 

wise details related to ownership, irrigation source, yield etc., can also be accessed by the users of the system. This system is being used 

for pooling up the details obtained from the DPR. In other words, the DPR is made available online in the form of a database which will 

help the stakeholders know areas of importance viz., already treated areas/historical works in the area, proposed areas for treatment 

etc., for further treatment and planning. The system would also show the satellite imageries of various years from the project inception 

stage to the project closing stages. This allows the user to Evaluate the effectiveness of the treatment and thereby plan corrective 

measures for the project area. The system would serve as an aiding tool to the planners and Evaluators for judging the efficacy of the 

project. 

Yet another component of the Web-based CIS system is the Mobile based Monitoring & Evaluation System, which will help the ground staff alias 

WDTs [Watershed Development Team) to transmit information from the ground level to the central server. Also, any higher-up official in charge 

of the project can obtain information regarding the project area on their mobile phone by means of an SMS. The system works in the following 

manner. The WDT equipped with a GPS instrument marks the latitude-longitude information of various treatment areas during the DPR. The 

probable sites are then transferred onto the central server. During the works phase, any 



Plans For Project management: 

The Project management of any watershed programme is very important. It mainly depends upon the community organisation and the village 

level institutes.In Vinjalpar, watershed committee and various user group have been formulated for post project operation and maintenance of 

assets created during project period. Major emphasis will be on equity and sustainable benefit of the project even after implementation stage. A 

proper link-up will be built during project period with various institutes and capacity building organisation. They will act as a major kingpin 

during post implementation for scaling up the successful experience during project. 

Watershed Development Fund: 

The major source of financial assistance after post implementation period is watershed Development Fund. The contribution of it 

will comes mainly fund the following: 

Table No. 60. Details of Watershed Development Fund(WDF) 

S. No Financial Details Percent Contribution 

1 Natural Resource Management 

For General 10% 

ForSC/ST 5% 

2 For Intensive Agriculture, Horticulture and animal Husbandry 

For General 40% 

ForSC/ST 20% 



It is planned that for SC/ST, BPL population the contribution will be taken in form of voluntary labour and the fund for labour will be diverted to 

the WDF. 

User Charges: 

Various user groups will be formed in village. These user groups will collect user charges according to the designated rules formed during the 

formation of user group. These funds will be transferred to the WDF funds as per these formulated rules. The secretary of watershed committee 

(WC) shall maintain the records of the following. 



Chapter - 8: Maps

Detailed Project Report - Commissionerate of Rural Development ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?