IWMP-11 - Commissionerate of Rural Development Gujarat State ...
IWMP-11 - Commissionerate of Rural Development Gujarat State ...
IWMP-11 - Commissionerate of Rural Development Gujarat State ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
DWDU, Rajkot<br />
Detailed Project Report<br />
<strong>IWMP</strong>: <strong>11</strong> (Sanathali)<br />
(Kanpar, Junapiplya, Jivapar, Dolatpar & Sanathali)<br />
( Ha.: 5987, Cost: 898.050 Lac )<br />
Year :- 2010-<strong>11</strong><br />
PIA : D. W. D. U. – Rajkot<br />
D.L.N.A. : District Watershed <strong>Development</strong> Unit – Rajkot<br />
Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-<strong>11</strong> 1
DWDU, Rajkot<br />
Table <strong>of</strong> Contents<br />
Chapter 1 Project Background 12<br />
1.1 Project Background 13<br />
Table no. 1: Basic project information 13<br />
1.2 Need <strong>of</strong> Watershed <strong>Development</strong> Programme 14<br />
Table no. 2: Weightage <strong>of</strong> the Project 14<br />
Table No.2.1 Criteria and weightage for selection <strong>of</strong> watershed 15<br />
Table no. 3: Watershed information 16<br />
1.3 Other projects/scheme running in the project villages 17<br />
Table no.4: <strong>Development</strong>al programmes running in the project area: 18<br />
Table no. 5: Previous Watershed programme in the project area: 21<br />
Chapter 2 Project Implementing Agency 22<br />
2.1 Project Implementing Agency 23<br />
2.2 About District Watershed <strong>Development</strong> Unit, Rajkot. 23<br />
2.2.1 The organization and its objectives: 23<br />
2.2.2 Programmes/projects running in the district 24<br />
2.3 SWOT Analysis <strong>of</strong> the DWDU 25<br />
Table no. 6: PIA: 26<br />
Table no. 7: Staff at PIA level: 26<br />
Chapter 3 Basic Information <strong>of</strong> the Project Area 27<br />
Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-<strong>11</strong> 2
DWDU, Rajkot<br />
3.1. Geography and Geo-hydrology 28<br />
3.1.1 Land use pattern: 28<br />
Table no. 8: Land use pattern: 28<br />
3.1.2 Soil and topography 28<br />
Table no. 9: Soil type and topography 29<br />
Table no. 10: Flood and drought condition 29<br />
Table no. <strong>11</strong>: Soil Erosion 30<br />
Table no. <strong>11</strong>.1: Soil Salinity/Alkalinity (Salinity ingress) 30<br />
Table: 12. Climatic Conditions(Last six years annual rainfall, maximum and minimum temperature <strong>of</strong> 30<br />
Jasdan taluk<br />
3.1.3 Slope 31<br />
Table no. 13: Physiography and relief 31<br />
3.2 Land and Agriculture 32<br />
Table no. 14: Land ownership details 32<br />
Table no. 15: Agriculture 33<br />
3.2.1 Irrigation 34<br />
Table no. 16: Irrigation 34<br />
Table no. 17: Crop details 35<br />
3.3 Livestock 37<br />
Table no. 18: Livestock 37<br />
Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-<strong>11</strong> 3
DWDU, Rajkot<br />
Table no. 19: Drinking water 37<br />
Table no. 20: Details <strong>of</strong> Common Property Resources 38<br />
3.5 Socio-Economic Pr<strong>of</strong>ile 38<br />
3.5.1 Demographic Status 38<br />
Table no. 21: Demographic information 39<br />
Table no. 22: Literacy rate 39<br />
3.5.2 Migration Pattern 39<br />
Table no. 23: Migration details 40<br />
Table no. 24: Poverty 40<br />
3.5.3 Infrastructure facilities 40<br />
Table no. 25: Village infrastructure 41<br />
Table no. 26: Facilities / HH assets 41<br />
3.5.4 Livelihood pattern 41<br />
Table no. 27: Per capita Income 42<br />
Table no.28: Dependence on Forest/CPR 42<br />
Table no. 29: Livelihood pattern (Occupational distribution) 43<br />
Chapter 4 Watershed Activities 44<br />
Watershed Activities 45<br />
4.1. Scientific Planning 45 to 50<br />
Table no. 30: Details <strong>of</strong> Scientific Planning and Inputs in <strong>IWMP</strong> projects 51<br />
Table no. 31: Details <strong>of</strong> PRA Activities conducted in the project area 56<br />
Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-<strong>11</strong> 4
DWDU, Rajkot<br />
4.2. Institution Building 57<br />
Table no. 32.1: Watershed Committee details: Kanpar 58<br />
Table no. 32.2: Watershed Committee details: Junapiplya 59<br />
Table no. 32.3: Watershed Committee details: Jivapar 61<br />
Table no. 32.4: Watershed Committee details: Dolatpar 63<br />
Table no. 32.5: Watershed Committee details: Sanathali 65<br />
ii) Self Help Group 68<br />
Table no. 33.1: SHG detail: Kanpar 69<br />
Table no. 33.2: SHG detail: Junapiplya 69<br />
Table no. 33.3: SHG detail: Jivapar 69<br />
Table no. 33.4: SHG detail: Dolatpar 70<br />
Table no. 33.5: SHG detail: Sanathali 71<br />
iii) User Group: 72<br />
Table No. 34: The following types <strong>of</strong> groups were planned to be formed 72<br />
Table no. 34.1 : UG detail: Kanpar 73<br />
Table no. 34.2: UG detail: Junapipilya 73<br />
Table no. 34.3 : UG detail: Jivapar 73<br />
Table no. 34. 4: UG detail: Dolatpar 74<br />
Table no. 34.54: UG detail: Sanathali 74<br />
4.3. Physical activities to be undertaken under <strong>IWMP</strong>-<strong>11</strong> 76<br />
4.3.1: Activities to be undertaken under EPA 76<br />
Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-<strong>11</strong> 5
DWDU, Rajkot<br />
Table No. 35: Entry Point Activities (EPA): Some <strong>of</strong> the major activities proposed in Kanpar are: 76<br />
Table No. 35.1: Some <strong>of</strong> the major activities proposed in Juna Pipliya are: 77<br />
Table No. 35.2: Some <strong>of</strong> the major activities proposed in Jivapar are: 77<br />
Table No. 35.3: Some <strong>of</strong> the major activities proposed in Dolatpar are: 78<br />
Table No. 35.4: Some <strong>of</strong> the major activities proposed in Sanathali are: 78<br />
4.3.2. Watershed <strong>Development</strong> Works: 79<br />
4.3.2.1 Ridge Area Treatment Plans 79<br />
1. Contour Bunds/Trench 79<br />
2. Boulder Checks /Loose Boulder checks 80<br />
3. Gabions 81<br />
4.3.2.2 Drainage line Treatment and water harvesting for land development: 82<br />
1. Check dams 82<br />
2. Waste weirs 82<br />
4.3.2.3 Plains or Flat level/Field level: 83<br />
1) Farm Pond: 83<br />
2) Irrigation/Percolation tank 83<br />
3) Farm bund 84<br />
4) Afforestation 84<br />
Table no.36: Details <strong>of</strong> ridge line treatment / land based activities in watershed works: Kanpar 85<br />
Table no. 36.i: Details <strong>of</strong> ridge line treatment / land based activities in watershed works: Junapipaliya 86<br />
Table no. 36.ii: Details <strong>of</strong> ridge line treatment / land based activities in watershed works: Jivapar 87<br />
Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-<strong>11</strong> 6
DWDU, Rajkot<br />
Table no. 36.iii: Details <strong>of</strong> engineering structures in watershed works: Dolatpar 88<br />
Table no. 36.iv: Details <strong>of</strong> engineering structures in watershed works: Snathali 89<br />
Table No 36.a: Technical Details <strong>of</strong> Earthen Contour Bund/Trench 90<br />
Table No 36.b: Technical Details <strong>of</strong> Boulder checks<br />
90<br />
Table No 36.c: Technical Details <strong>of</strong> Gabion structures<br />
93<br />
Table No-36 .d: Technical Details <strong>of</strong> Afforestation Activities 95<br />
Table No 36.e: Technical Details/Estimates <strong>of</strong> Farm Bund 97<br />
Table No 36.f Technical Details <strong>of</strong> Farm Pond 98<br />
Table no 36.g. Technical details <strong>of</strong> Irrigation/Percolation Tank 98<br />
Table no 36.h. Technical details & Cost Estimation <strong>of</strong> Waste weir 99<br />
Table no 36.j. Technical details <strong>of</strong> Check dam 101<br />
Table no.37: Activities related to Surface water resources in (all financial figures in lakh Rs.): Kanpar 103<br />
Table no.37.1: Activities related to Surface water resources in (all financial figures in lakh Rs.): Juna 104<br />
Pipliya<br />
Table no.37.2: Activities related to Surface water resources in (all financial figures in lakh Rs.): Jivapar 105<br />
Table no.37.3: Activities related to Surface water resources in (all financial figures in lakh Rs.): Dolatpar 106<br />
Table no.37.4: Activities related to Surface water resources in cluster <strong>IWMP</strong>-<strong>11</strong> (all financial figures in 107<br />
lakh Rs.): Sanathali<br />
Table no.38: Activities related to recharging ground water resources in the project areas (all financial 108<br />
figures in lakh Rs.)<br />
Table no.39: Details <strong>of</strong> activities related to livelihood, production system and micro-enterprises: <strong>11</strong>3<br />
Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-<strong>11</strong> 7
DWDU, Rajkot<br />
Kanpar<br />
Table no.39.1: Details <strong>of</strong> activities related to livelihood, production system and micro-enterprises: <strong>11</strong>4<br />
Junapipliya<br />
Table no.39.2: Details <strong>of</strong> activities related to livelihood, production system and micro-enterprises:<br />
<strong>11</strong>5<br />
Jivapar<br />
Table no.39.3: Details <strong>of</strong> activities related to livelihood, production system and micro-enterprises:<br />
<strong>11</strong>7<br />
Dolatpar<br />
Table no.39.4: Details <strong>of</strong> activities related to livelihood, production system and micro-enterprises:<br />
<strong>11</strong>8<br />
Snanthali<br />
Table no. 40: Activities related to livelihoods by Self Help Groups (SHGs) in the project areas: 120<br />
Table no. 41: Linkages developed at village level 124<br />
Table no.42: Details <strong>of</strong> activities connected with vegetative cover in watershed works: Kanpar 124<br />
Table no.42.1: Details <strong>of</strong> activities connected with vegetative cover in watershed works: Juna Pipaliya 125<br />
126<br />
Table no.42.2: Details <strong>of</strong> activities connected with vegetative cover in watershed works: Jangvad<br />
Table no.42.3: Details <strong>of</strong> activities connected with vegetative cover in watershed works: Dolatpar 127<br />
Table no.42.4: Details <strong>of</strong> activities connected with vegetative cover in watershed works: Sanathali 128<br />
Livelihood Intervention 129<br />
Production System-1: Fodder bank for Watershed 131<br />
Table 42.i .Primary Model for A Fodder Bank 134<br />
Table no: 42.ii: Cost <strong>of</strong> cultivation for fodder production 136<br />
Table No. 42.iii, Revenue and return Details. 136<br />
Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-<strong>11</strong> 8
DWDU, Rajkot<br />
Production System - 2: Vermi composting unit for Project villages 138<br />
Table: 42.iv Model <strong>of</strong> a Vermi-compost Unit for 40 beds <strong>of</strong> Dimension (10mt*1mt*0.3mt) 141<br />
Table No-42.v: Returns from vermin-composting 142<br />
Production System – 3 Khadi based industries 143<br />
Production System – 4: Turmeric Cultivation 146<br />
Table No-42.vi: Economics <strong>of</strong> turmeric cultivation in 1ha. Area 146<br />
Production System – 5: Floriculture 148<br />
Table No-42.vii: Economics <strong>of</strong> Marigold cultivation 149<br />
Activity Flow Chart - Marigold 150<br />
Table No-42.viii Technical Details <strong>of</strong> Sunflower Plantation Activities 153<br />
Table No-42.ix: Economic <strong>of</strong> Rose cultivation in 1 Hectare 156<br />
Production system -6 Agricultural Implements 157<br />
Table no.43: Techmical Detail <strong>of</strong> Bio-gas 160<br />
Table no.43.1: Details <strong>of</strong> activities in the CPRs in the project areas 163<br />
4.4 Capacity building and Institutional collaboration 164<br />
Table no. 44: Institutes Identified for Capacity Building 166<br />
Table no. 45: Capacity Building plan 166<br />
Table no.46: Information, Education and Communication Activities 167<br />
Chapter 5 Budgeting 168<br />
Table no. 47: Budget at a glance 169<br />
Table no. 48: Village wise- component wise budget available under <strong>IWMP</strong> 170<br />
Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-<strong>11</strong> 9
DWDU, Rajkot<br />
Table no. 49: Village wise gap in funds requirement 170<br />
Table no.50: Details <strong>of</strong> Convergence <strong>of</strong> <strong>IWMP</strong> with other Schemes 159<br />
Table no. 51: Public-Private Partnership in the <strong>IWMP</strong> projects 160<br />
Chapter 6 Expected Outcome 162<br />
6.1.1 Environmental Benefits 162<br />
Table no. 52: Environmental Benefits 162<br />
6.1.2 Drinking water 163<br />
Table no. 53: Status <strong>of</strong> Drinking water 163<br />
6.1.3 Crops 163<br />
Table no. 54: Details <strong>of</strong> crop area and yield in the project areas 164<br />
Table no. 55: Area under horticulture/Other crops 164<br />
6.1. 4: Livestock 164<br />
Table no. 56: Details <strong>of</strong> livestock in the project areas 165<br />
6.1.5 Employment 165<br />
Table no. 57: Employment in Project area 166<br />
6.1.6 Migration 166<br />
Table no. 58: Details <strong>of</strong> seasonal migration from Project area 167<br />
Table no.59: Per capita Income 167<br />
Linkages 167<br />
Table no. 60: Backward-Forward linkages 167<br />
Logical Framework Analysis 169<br />
Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-<strong>11</strong> 10
DWDU, Rajkot<br />
Chapter 7 Quality and Sustainability Issues 175<br />
Plans for Monitoring and Evaluation 176<br />
Vigilance and Monitoring Committees 177<br />
Research support in watershed management 177<br />
Farmer organization and empowerment 177<br />
Use <strong>of</strong> traditional institutions and indigenous knowledge 178<br />
Plans For Project management: 179<br />
Watershed <strong>Development</strong> Fund: 179<br />
Table No. 60. Details <strong>of</strong> Watershed <strong>Development</strong> Fund(WDF) 179<br />
User Charges: 180<br />
Chapter 8 Mapping 181<br />
Watershed baseline map<br />
River water body map<br />
Slope map<br />
Geomorphology map<br />
Soil map<br />
Land use/Land cover map<br />
Groundwater map<br />
Action plan map<br />
Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-<strong>11</strong> <strong>11</strong>
DWDU, Rajkot<br />
CHAPTER - 1<br />
PROJECT BACKGROUND<br />
Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-<strong>11</strong> 12
DWDU, Rajkot<br />
1.1 Project Background<br />
The milliwatershed consists <strong>of</strong> five villages namely, Kanpar, Junapiplya, Jivapar, Jasapar, Dolatpar and Sanathali.<br />
<strong>IWMP</strong>-<strong>11</strong> cluster which are located in Jasdan Taluka <strong>of</strong> Rajkot District in <strong>Gujarat</strong> state. The project is a cluster <strong>of</strong> 9 micro<br />
watersheds with 5G1B9c1b, 5G1B9d1f, 5G1B9d2a, 5G1B9d2b, 5G1B9c1g, 5G1B9a1e, 5G1B9a1f, 5G1B9a1h, 5G1B9a1g as micro<br />
watershed codes. The total project area <strong>of</strong> the watershed is 8486.90 out <strong>of</strong> which 5987ha, ha is proposed to be treated under<br />
Integrated Watershed Management Programme (<strong>IWMP</strong>).<br />
The nearest town is Jasdan which is about 25 km from the project area and well connected by pucca road. In the watershed<br />
villages Patel, Darbar, Rabari, Koli, Bharvad, Muslims and Harijan communities are the primary inhabitants <strong>of</strong> the village. The<br />
villagers mainly depend upon agriculture or working in diamond polishing shops, thresher industries in Jasdan and Atkot urban<br />
areas. The bharvad community mainly depends upon dairying. Agriculture is totally dependent on rainfall. Drinking water mainly<br />
comes from the Narmda Pipeline and other wells/ borewells. Horticultural plants and afforestation plants planted under hariyali<br />
project in Sanathali and Jivapar increase the beauty <strong>of</strong> villages. The visible trees in the farmlands are Neem, Babool, Bor, Amli,<br />
Pipar, Jamphal , Pipal, Lemon and Vad.<br />
Table no. 1: Basic project information<br />
Sl.<br />
No<br />
Name <strong>of</strong><br />
Villages<br />
the project Name Census<br />
code<br />
Gram<br />
Panchayats<br />
Taluka District Area <strong>of</strong><br />
the<br />
project<br />
Area<br />
proposed<br />
to be<br />
treated<br />
Total<br />
project<br />
cost (Rs.<br />
in lakh)<br />
1 <strong>IWMP</strong>-<strong>11</strong> Kanpar 00677400 Kanpar Jasdan Rajkot 1586.6 1086.70 163.01<br />
2 Junapiplya 00677900 Junapiplya 1258.5 758.50 <strong>11</strong>3.78<br />
3 Jivapar 00678000 Jivapar 1523.1 1023.10 153.47<br />
4 Dalatpar 00677700 Dalatpar 803.50 303.50 45.53<br />
5 Sanathali 00678700 Sanathali 3315.2 2815.20 422.28<br />
Total<br />
8486.90 5987.00 898.05<br />
PIA<br />
DWDU<br />
Rajkot<br />
Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-<strong>11</strong> 13
DWDU, Rajkot<br />
1.2 Need <strong>of</strong> Watershed <strong>Development</strong> Programme<br />
Watershed <strong>Development</strong> Programme is selected on the basis <strong>of</strong> thirteen parameter namely Poverty Index, Percentage <strong>of</strong><br />
SC/ST, Actual wages, Percentage <strong>of</strong> small and marginal farmers, Ground water status, Moisture Index, Area under rain fed<br />
agriculture, Drinking water situation in the area, Percentage <strong>of</strong> degraded land, Productivity potential <strong>of</strong> land, Continuity <strong>of</strong> another<br />
watershed that has already developed/treated, Cluster Approach for hilly terrain. Based on these thirteen parameter a composite<br />
ranking has been given to the watershed project as given in Table no. 3.<br />
The total number <strong>of</strong> families under BPL is 928 , which is 45 per cent <strong>of</strong> total households <strong>of</strong> the village. Hence a score <strong>of</strong> 5 is<br />
allotted. The percentage <strong>of</strong> schedule castes in the cluster villages is less than 20 per cent to the total population; hence a score <strong>of</strong> 3<br />
is allotted. Rain fed agriculture forms the primary occupation <strong>of</strong> the village due to the fact that ground water is saline and hence<br />
unfit for usage. Less than 50 per cent <strong>of</strong> the farmers are small and marginal by nature and the actual wages earned by the labour is<br />
less than the minimum wages hence a composite rank <strong>of</strong> 5, 3 and. 5 are allotted respectively.<br />
Since the rainfall received is erratic and irregular, the moisture index is low and the area is classified under DDP block.<br />
Drinking water is problematic in the village as low percolation into soil. Majority <strong>of</strong> land is degraded due to uneven level <strong>of</strong> land<br />
low percolation ratio <strong>of</strong> water inside the soil The soil is very permeable and production <strong>of</strong> the land can be significantly enriched<br />
with the availability <strong>of</strong> timely irrigation. The 13 watersheds in the project cover a total area <strong>of</strong> 4239.30 Ha. Thus a cumulative score<br />
<strong>of</strong> 99. All the parameters were taken together to give a cumulative score <strong>of</strong> 99 to the watershed.<br />
Table no. 2: Weightage <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
Project<br />
Project<br />
Weightage<br />
name type<br />
i ii iii iv v vi vii viii ix x xi xii Xiii<br />
<strong>IWMP</strong>-<strong>11</strong> Desert 5 3 5 3 3 15 10 5 10 10 10 15 5<br />
Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-<strong>11</strong> 14
DWDU, Rajkot<br />
Table No.2.1 Criteria and weightage for selection <strong>of</strong> watershed<br />
S.<br />
No<br />
i<br />
Criteria<br />
Poverty index (% <strong>of</strong> poor<br />
to population)<br />
Maxi<br />
mum<br />
Ranges & scores<br />
score<br />
10 Above 80 % (10) 80 to 50 % (7.5) 50 to 20 % (5) Below<br />
20 %<br />
(2.5)<br />
ii % <strong>of</strong> SC/ ST population 10 More than 40 % (10) 20 to 40 % (5) Less than 20 % (3)<br />
iii Actual wages 5 Actual wages are<br />
significantly lower than<br />
minimum wages (5)<br />
Actual wages are<br />
equal to or higher<br />
than minimum<br />
wages (0)<br />
iv % <strong>of</strong> small and marginal 10 More than 80 % (10) 50 to 80 % (5) Less than 50 % (3)<br />
farmers<br />
v Ground water status 5 Over exploited (5) Critical (3) Sub critical (2) Safe (0)<br />
vi Moisture index/<br />
DPAP/ DDP Block<br />
15 -66.7 & below (15)<br />
DDP Block<br />
-33.3 to -66.6 (10)<br />
DPAP Block<br />
0 to -33.2 (0)<br />
Non DPAP/ DDP Block<br />
vii Area under rain-fed<br />
agriculture<br />
15 More than 90 % (15) 80 to 90 % (10) 70 to 80% (5) Above<br />
70 %<br />
viii Drinking water 10 No source (10) Problematic village<br />
(7.5)<br />
ix Degraded land 15 High – above 20 % (15) Medium – 10 to 20 %<br />
(10)<br />
x Productivity potential <strong>of</strong><br />
the land<br />
15 Lands with low<br />
production & where<br />
productivity can be<br />
significantly enhanced<br />
with reasonable efforts<br />
(15)<br />
Lands with moderate<br />
production & where<br />
productivity can be<br />
enhanced with<br />
reasonable efforts<br />
(10)<br />
Partially covered (5)<br />
Low- less than 10 % <strong>of</strong><br />
TGA (5)<br />
Lands with high<br />
production & where<br />
productivity can be<br />
marginally enhanced<br />
with reasonable<br />
efforts (5)<br />
(Reject)<br />
Fully<br />
covered<br />
(0)<br />
Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-<strong>11</strong> 15
DWDU, Rajkot<br />
xi<br />
xii<br />
xiii<br />
Contiguity to another<br />
watershed that has<br />
already been developed/<br />
treated<br />
Cluster approach in the<br />
plains (more than one<br />
contiguous microwatersheds<br />
in the<br />
project)<br />
Cluster approach in the<br />
hills (more than one<br />
contiguous microwatersheds<br />
in the<br />
project)<br />
10 Contiguous to previously<br />
treated watershed &<br />
contiguity within the<br />
microwatersheds in the<br />
project (10)<br />
15 Above 6 micro-watersheds<br />
in cluster (15)<br />
15 Above 5 micro-watersheds<br />
in cluster (15)<br />
Contiguity within the<br />
microwatersheds in<br />
the project but non<br />
contiguous to<br />
previously treated<br />
watershed (5)<br />
4 to 6<br />
microwatersheds in<br />
cluster (10)<br />
3 to 5<br />
microwatersheds in<br />
cluster (10)<br />
Neither contiguous to<br />
previously treated<br />
watershed nor<br />
contiguity within the<br />
microwatersheds in<br />
the project (0)<br />
2 to 4<br />
microwatersheds in<br />
cluster (5)<br />
2 to 3<br />
microwatersheds in<br />
cluster (5)<br />
Total 150 150 90 41 2.5<br />
Table no. 3: Watershed information<br />
Name <strong>of</strong> the project No. <strong>of</strong><br />
watersheds to be<br />
Watershed code<br />
Watershed<br />
regime/type/order<br />
treated<br />
Kanpar 1 5G1B9c1b Milli watershed<br />
Junapiplya 1 5G1B9d1f Milli watershed<br />
Jivapar 3 5G1B9d2a, 5G1B9d2b, 5G1B9c1g Milli watershed<br />
Dolatpar 3 5G1B9a1e, 5G1B9a1f, 5G1B9a1h Milli watershed<br />
Sanathali 2 5G1B9a1g, 5G1B9a1f<br />
Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-<strong>11</strong> 16
DWDU, Rajkot<br />
1.3 Other projects/scheme running in the project villages<br />
(1) MGNREGS: Pond deepening and widening <strong>of</strong> road works completed in all villages.<br />
(2) Prehariyali/ Hariyali watershed programme: Under the EAS and DDP project, total area <strong>of</strong> 2500 ha in total project area<br />
have been treated where all activities related to soil and water conservation measures have been taken care. Two solar<br />
street-lamps installed so far under DDP to promote non conventional source <strong>of</strong> energy in each village.<br />
(3) Total Sanitation Campaign (TSC): 617 individual toilets in the project villages and one public toilets in Sanathali and<br />
Jivapar, has been constructed under TSC programme in the project area.<br />
(4) Indira Awas Yojana: Total 46 house has been constructed in the five villages under this yojana.<br />
(5) Sardar Awas Yojana: Total 45 house has been constructed in these villages under this yojana<br />
(6) WASMO/Sector reform: In the project villages 1333 houses get water by tap connection under WASMO programme.<br />
(7) GGY: Two villagers have been benefitted under this programme where road in market has been taken.<br />
Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-<strong>11</strong> 17
DWDU, Rajkot<br />
Table no.4: <strong>Development</strong>al programmes running in the project area<br />
Kanpar<br />
SI<br />
no<br />
Name <strong>of</strong> the<br />
programme/scheme<br />
Sponsoring<br />
agency<br />
1 Sector reform/WASMO Govt <strong>of</strong> <strong>Gujarat</strong><br />
Objectives <strong>of</strong> the<br />
programme/scheme<br />
Year <strong>of</strong><br />
commencement<br />
Villages<br />
covered<br />
Estimated<br />
number <strong>of</strong><br />
beneficiaries<br />
Water tank - Pipe-line 2002-03 1 250<br />
2 MGNREGS CRD Employment 2009-10 1 120<br />
3 IAY CRD Housing 2003-04 1 13<br />
4 Pre-Hariyali Central Govt. Desert Area <strong>Development</strong> 1995-96 1 210<br />
5 TSC Govt <strong>of</strong> India Sanitation 2004-05 1 160<br />
Junapipliya<br />
SI<br />
no<br />
Name <strong>of</strong> the<br />
programme/scheme<br />
Sponsoring<br />
agency<br />
1 Sector reform/WASMO Govt <strong>of</strong> <strong>Gujarat</strong><br />
Objectives <strong>of</strong> the<br />
programme/scheme<br />
Year <strong>of</strong><br />
commencement<br />
Villages<br />
covered<br />
Estimated<br />
number <strong>of</strong><br />
beneficiaries<br />
Water tank, - Pipe-line 2006-07 1 238<br />
2 MGNREGS CRD Employment 2009-10 1 20<br />
3 IAY CRD Housing 2003-04 1 1<br />
4 Hariyali Central Govt. Desert Area <strong>Development</strong> 2003-04 1 180<br />
5 SAY<br />
Govt. Of<br />
<strong>Gujarat</strong><br />
Housing<br />
2006-07 1 40<br />
6 TSC Govt <strong>of</strong> India Sanitation 2004-05 1 99<br />
Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-<strong>11</strong> 18
DWDU, Rajkot<br />
Jivapar<br />
SI<br />
no<br />
Name <strong>of</strong> the<br />
programme/scheme<br />
Sponsoring<br />
agency<br />
Objectives <strong>of</strong> the<br />
programme/scheme<br />
Year <strong>of</strong><br />
commencement<br />
Villages<br />
covered<br />
Estimated<br />
number <strong>of</strong><br />
beneficiaries<br />
1 Sector reform/WASMO Govt <strong>of</strong> <strong>Gujarat</strong> Water tank, Havada pump<br />
2003-04 1 320<br />
houhe - Pipe-line<br />
2 MGNREGS CRD Employment 2009-10 1 215<br />
3 IAY CRD Housing 2005-06 1 5<br />
4 PDY Govt <strong>of</strong> <strong>Gujarat</strong> Housing 2009-10 1 29<br />
5 GGY<br />
Govt. Of<br />
<strong>Gujarat</strong><br />
Village internal road 2007-08 1<br />
All the<br />
villagers<br />
6 TSC Govt <strong>of</strong> India Sanitation 2008-09 1 275<br />
7 SAY<br />
Govt. Of<br />
<strong>Gujarat</strong><br />
8 Hariyali CRD<br />
Dolatpar<br />
SI<br />
no<br />
Name <strong>of</strong> the<br />
programme/scheme<br />
Sponsoring<br />
agency<br />
1 Sector reform/WASMO Govt <strong>of</strong> <strong>Gujarat</strong><br />
Housing<br />
Desert Area <strong>Development</strong><br />
Objectives <strong>of</strong> the<br />
programme/scheme<br />
2006-07 1 2<br />
2003-04 1 240<br />
Year <strong>of</strong><br />
commencement<br />
Villages<br />
covered<br />
Estimated<br />
number <strong>of</strong><br />
beneficiaries<br />
Bore Well - Pipe-line 2001-02 1 <strong>11</strong>0<br />
2 MGNREGS CRD Employment 2009-10 1 25<br />
3 IAY CRD Housing 2005-06 1 15<br />
4 Hariyali Central Govt. Desert Area <strong>Development</strong> 2003-04 1 125<br />
5 TSC<br />
Central Govt.<br />
Sanitation 2008-09 1 25<br />
Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-<strong>11</strong> 19
DWDU, Rajkot<br />
SI<br />
no<br />
Sanathali<br />
Name <strong>of</strong> the<br />
programme/scheme<br />
Sponsoring<br />
agency<br />
Objectives <strong>of</strong> the<br />
programme/scheme<br />
Year <strong>of</strong><br />
commencement<br />
Villages<br />
covered<br />
Estimated<br />
number <strong>of</strong><br />
beneficiaries<br />
1 Sector reform/WASMO Govt <strong>of</strong> <strong>Gujarat</strong> Water tank, Havada Bore<br />
2003-04 1 425<br />
Well - Pipe-line<br />
2 MGNREGS CRD Employment 2009-10 1 300<br />
3 IAY CRD Housing 2005-06 1 12<br />
4 Hariyali Central Govt. Desert Area <strong>Development</strong> 2004-05 1 220<br />
5 SAY<br />
Govt. Of<br />
<strong>Gujarat</strong><br />
Housing<br />
2005-06 1 3<br />
6 TSC Govt <strong>of</strong> India Sanitation 2004-05 1 58<br />
7 GGY<br />
Govt. Of<br />
<strong>Gujarat</strong><br />
Village internal road 2007-08 1<br />
All the<br />
villagers<br />
Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-<strong>11</strong> 20
DWDU, Rajkot<br />
Table no. 5: Previous Watershed programme in the project area:<br />
SI Project Year<br />
n o name start<br />
ed<br />
1 D.D.P -<br />
07<br />
2 D.D.P -<br />
08<br />
3 D.D.P -<br />
09<br />
2001<br />
-<br />
2002<br />
2002<br />
-<br />
2003<br />
2003<br />
-<br />
2004<br />
Name <strong>of</strong><br />
villages<br />
No. Of<br />
micro<br />
watershe<br />
d<br />
Watershe<br />
d codes<br />
Area<br />
under<br />
treatmen<br />
t<br />
(ha)<br />
Fundin<br />
g<br />
source<br />
Kanpar 1 5G1B9c1b 500 GOI &<br />
GOG<br />
Junapiply<br />
a<br />
1 5G1B9d1f 500 GOI &<br />
GOG<br />
Jivapar 3 5G1B9d2a<br />
5G1B9c1g<br />
500 Govt. &<br />
GOG<br />
Nodal<br />
agenc<br />
y<br />
DWDU<br />
Rajkot<br />
DWDU<br />
Rajkot<br />
DWDU<br />
Rajkot<br />
PIA<br />
Total<br />
cost<br />
Expenditu<br />
re<br />
incurred<br />
up to start<br />
<strong>of</strong> <strong>IWMP</strong><br />
%<br />
financial<br />
completio<br />
n<br />
SWAD 30.00 30.00 100 100<br />
SWAD 30.00 30.00 100 100<br />
Taluka<br />
p.<br />
Jasadan<br />
30.00 30.00 100 100<br />
% physical<br />
completio<br />
n<br />
4 D.D.P -<br />
<strong>11</strong><br />
5 D.D.P -<br />
10<br />
2005<br />
-<br />
2006<br />
2004<br />
-<br />
2005<br />
Dolatpar 3 5G1B9a1e,<br />
5G1B9a1h<br />
Sanathali 2 5G1B9a1g,<br />
5G1B9a1f<br />
500 GOI &<br />
GOG<br />
500 GOI &<br />
GOG<br />
DWDU<br />
Rajkot<br />
DWDU<br />
Rajkot<br />
T.P.<br />
Jasadan 30.00 30.00 100 100<br />
T.P.<br />
Jasadan 22.50 22.50 75 75<br />
Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-<strong>11</strong> 21
DWDU, Rajkot<br />
CHAPTER - 2<br />
PROJECT IMPLEMENTING AGENCY<br />
Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-<strong>11</strong> 22
DWDU, Rajkot<br />
2.1 Project Implementing Agency<br />
The Project Implementing Agency (PIA) is being selected by an appropriate mechanism by <strong>State</strong> Level Nodal Agency (SLNA). PIAs<br />
would be responsible for implementation <strong>of</strong> watershed project. These PIAs may include relevant line departments, autonomous<br />
organizations under <strong>State</strong>/ Central Governments, Government Institutes/ Research bodies, Intermediate Panchayats, Voluntary<br />
Organizations (VOs).The PIA <strong>of</strong> <strong>IWMP</strong>-<strong>11</strong> watershed Project is District watershed development Unit, Rajkot.<br />
2.2 About District Watershed <strong>Development</strong> Unit, Rajkot.<br />
2.2.1 The organization and its objectives:<br />
The District Watershed <strong>Development</strong> Unit (DWDU), Rajkot is a district level nodal agency and was established on 12th June 2008<br />
under constitution <strong>of</strong> Para 30 <strong>of</strong> new guideline, to oversee for the smooth implementation <strong>of</strong> watershed projects in the district. The<br />
District <strong>Development</strong> Officer (DDO) is the chairman <strong>of</strong> the DWDU. The DWDU have dedicated and experience staffs comprising one<br />
Project Director (deputation from <strong>Gujarat</strong> Forest Department), a Technical Expert and multidisciplinary team <strong>of</strong> civil engineer,<br />
agriculture expert, community mobilization expert, computer operator, MIS coordinator, system analyst and executive assistant.<br />
The DWDU Rajkot has its own rented <strong>of</strong>fice near Junction plot 5, Prakash Niketan.<br />
The functions <strong>of</strong> DWDU:<br />
a) Take up the over all responsibility <strong>of</strong> facilitating preparation <strong>of</strong> strategic and annual action plans for watershed development<br />
projects in the district.<br />
b) Providing pr<strong>of</strong>essional and technical support to Project Implementing Agencies (PIAs) in planning and execution <strong>of</strong> watershed<br />
development projects.<br />
Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-<strong>11</strong> 23
DWDU, Rajkot<br />
c) Develop action plans for capacity building with close involvement <strong>of</strong> resource organizations to execute the capacity building<br />
action plans.<br />
d) Carry out regular monitoring, evaluation and learning.<br />
e) Ensure smooth flow <strong>of</strong> funds to watershed development projects.<br />
f) Ensure timely submission <strong>of</strong> required documents to SLNA/Nodel Agency <strong>of</strong> the Department at central level.<br />
g) Facilitate and co-ordination with relevant programmes <strong>of</strong> agriculture, horticulture, rural development, animal husbandry, etc<br />
with watershed development and convergence plans for enhancement <strong>of</strong> productivity and livelihoods interventions for asset less<br />
persons.<br />
h) Integrate and co-ordinate watershed development projects/plans into district plans <strong>of</strong> the district planning committees.<br />
i) Establish and maintain the District Level Date Cell and link it to the <strong>State</strong> Level and National Level Data Centre.<br />
Moreover, the DWDU, Rajkot is working as a PIA for three <strong>IWMP</strong> projects.<br />
2.2.2 Programmes/projects running in the district<br />
At present 21 <strong>IWMP</strong> projects have been sanctioned by Government <strong>of</strong> India for the Rajkot district. The entry point activities <strong>of</strong> all<br />
the 6 <strong>IWMP</strong>-10-<strong>11</strong> projects have identified by the PIAs in the district. Rajkot Normal Forest Division as PIA for the four projects<br />
(<strong>IWMP</strong>-4, 5, 7 & 8), Rajkot Social Forest division as PIA for two (<strong>IWMP</strong>-1 & 6) projects and DWDU-self is as PIA for the three<br />
projects (<strong>IWMP</strong>-2, 3 & 9) for 2009-10 and <strong>IWMP</strong> 10-15 (6 projects) for the year 2010 & <strong>11</strong> .<br />
Apart from running nineteen <strong>IWMP</strong> projects, total 748 pre-Hariyali & Hariyali projects (DDP & IWDP) has been sanctioned and out<br />
<strong>of</strong> that 348 projects are completed and 400 projects are still running in the district. DWDU Rajkot is also monitoring a central<br />
government sponsored scheme on "Artificial Recharge <strong>of</strong> Groundwater through Dug wells" in the district which is spread over nine<br />
talukas.<br />
Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-<strong>11</strong> 24
DWDU, Rajkot<br />
2.3 SWOT Analysis <strong>of</strong> the DWDU<br />
Strength:<br />
(1) Dedicated and experience staffs and multidisciplinary team<br />
(2) Independent District Level Nodal Agency.<br />
(3) Strong linkages with national and state level institutions, agricultural universities, Sa<br />
urastra University, KVK and NGOs for capacity building and technical guidance<br />
(4) Scientific planning in watershed projects with the help <strong>of</strong> BISAG, Gandhinagar<br />
(5) District level monitoring, coordination Committee<br />
(6) Well establishment <strong>of</strong> PRIs for social audits for transparency and accountability.<br />
Weakness:<br />
(1) Insufficient funds to complete watershed projects per hectare.<br />
(2) Permanent staff is less in numbers.<br />
(3) No permanent <strong>of</strong>fice building.<br />
Opportunities:<br />
(1) Sustainable livelihood generation for landless and asset less persons.<br />
(2) Improvement <strong>of</strong> socio-economic status <strong>of</strong> poor.<br />
(3) Awareness generation among the beneficiaries through information, education and communication activities.<br />
(4) Reduction in migration rate.<br />
(5) Usage <strong>of</strong> new technologies <strong>of</strong> watershed modeling and GPS for monitoring <strong>of</strong> watershed activities.<br />
Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-<strong>11</strong> 25
DWDU, Rajkot<br />
Threats:<br />
(1) Shallow soil depth that make difficult for horticultural plants in fields.<br />
(2) Lack <strong>of</strong> sustainable agricultural development package.<br />
(3) Lack <strong>of</strong> voluntary contribution and cooperation from local peoples.<br />
(4) One <strong>of</strong> the foreseen challenges was "to overcome vested interests (including party politics, village factions) at village level and<br />
to reach out to the poorest in the watersheds"<br />
Table no. 6: PIA<br />
SI. No. Name <strong>of</strong> project Details <strong>of</strong> PIA<br />
Type <strong>of</strong> organization<br />
District Level Nodal Agency<br />
1 <strong>IWMP</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />
Name <strong>of</strong> Organisation<br />
DWDU, Rajkot<br />
Designation and Address<br />
Project Director .DWDU, Rajkot<br />
Telephone 0281-2454682<br />
Fax 0281-2453684<br />
E-mail<br />
rajdwdu@gmail.com<br />
Table no. 7: Staff at PIA level:<br />
SI<br />
Name Age Sex Designation Qualification Experience Job assigned Monthly<br />
no<br />
remuneration<br />
1 Mr A.H Gadhvi 51 M PIA & Project GFS 30 Project<br />
53000<br />
Director<br />
Management<br />
2 Mr. S.Pradhan 27 M Nodal Officer M.Tech.(SWCE) 4.1 Monitoring & 33600<br />
3 Mr Manoj Ramanuj 45 M WDT (Engg.) Diploma in C.E 5.7 Engg aspects 12000<br />
4 Mr Suresh Makvana 27 M WDT (Ag.) B.R.S 2.6 Agricultural 8000<br />
works<br />
5 Ms Toliya Rekha 23 F WDT (CO.) LLB, MSW 2 Community<br />
Mobilisation<br />
8000<br />
Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-<strong>11</strong> 26
DWDU, Rajkot<br />
CHAPTER - 3<br />
Basic Information <strong>of</strong> Project Area<br />
Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-<strong>11</strong> 27
DWDU, Rajkot<br />
3.1. Geography and Geo-hydrology<br />
3.1.1 Land use pattern:<br />
The net geographical area <strong>of</strong> cluster watershed is about 8486.90 ha out <strong>of</strong> which 1.18 %is forest area, which is 100.2 ha. About<br />
7256.2 ha or 85 % <strong>of</strong> land is under agriculture out <strong>of</strong> which 5875.88ha is rain fed, mainly a Kharif crop is taken. About 7.85 percent<br />
<strong>of</strong> land is cultivable wasteland and 5.46 percent is non cultivable wasteland.<br />
Table no. 8: Land use pattern:<br />
S. No.<br />
Names <strong>of</strong><br />
villages<br />
Geographical<br />
Area <strong>of</strong> the<br />
village<br />
Forest<br />
Area<br />
(ha)<br />
Land under<br />
agricultural use<br />
Rainfed<br />
area<br />
(ha)<br />
Permanent Wasteland<br />
Pastures Cultivable Noncultivable<br />
1 Kanpar 1586.6 0 1337.4 941.30 0 6.4 242.8<br />
2 Junapiplya 1258.5 0 1024.4 870.74 0 229.4 4.7<br />
3 Jivapar 1523.1 87.0 1296.1 1002.50 0 103.3 36.7<br />
4 Dolatpar 803.5 0 582.1 497.40 0 57.4 164.0<br />
5 Sanathali 3315.2 13.2 3016.2 2563.94 0 270.1 15.7<br />
Total 8486.9 100.2 7256.2 5875.88 0 666.6 463.9<br />
3.1.2 Soil and topography<br />
Nearly 82 % <strong>of</strong> the geographical are is comprised <strong>of</strong> shallow to medium deep black cotton soils having depth upto 0.6-0.75 mt top<br />
soil. Rest 18 % is either sandy loam or moorum soil. The soil is slightly reddish to very brown in surface colour. By large soils are<br />
well drained with moderate water holding capacity. From sustainable development perspectives, what is alarming the steady<br />
decline in the soil quality due to sheet erosion. There has a considerable reduction in the application <strong>of</strong> farm yard manure resulting<br />
in reduced in moisture retention capacity and porosity in the soils. Generally the organic carbon content too is very low. Lack <strong>of</strong><br />
water conservation measures at the field and at the community level has led to the acceleration <strong>of</strong> environmental degradation. The<br />
Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-<strong>11</strong> 28
DWDU, Rajkot<br />
increasing dependency on external input has increased the vulnerability <strong>of</strong> agriculture such that even small stresses and<br />
fluctuations in the environment lead to instability and threatens farming livelihoods. The topography <strong>of</strong> the area is moderate<br />
ranging from 0-10 % slope.<br />
Table no. 9: Soil type and topography<br />
S. No. Name <strong>of</strong> the Agro-climatic Area in ha Name <strong>of</strong> village Major soil types Topography<br />
a)Type<br />
b] Area in ha<br />
1<br />
2<br />
3<br />
North Saurashtra<br />
1586.6 Kanpar Black cotton and<br />
red murrom<br />
Junapiplya Black cotton, red<br />
1258.5<br />
murrom and<br />
sandy clayloam<br />
1523.1<br />
Jivapar<br />
Black cotton and<br />
red murrom,<br />
1337.4<br />
1024.4<br />
1296.1<br />
Flat to moderate<br />
slope<br />
Flat to moderate<br />
slope<br />
Flat to moderate<br />
slope<br />
4<br />
5<br />
803.5<br />
3315.2<br />
Dolatpar<br />
Sanathali<br />
Black cotton and<br />
sandy loam,<br />
sandy clay loam<br />
Black cotton and<br />
sandy loam,<br />
muroom<br />
582.1<br />
3016.2<br />
Flat to moderate<br />
slope<br />
Flat to moderate<br />
slope<br />
Table no. 10: Flood and drought condition<br />
SI no Village Flood (Incidence) Drought (Incidence)<br />
1 Kanpar Nil Once in 3 Years<br />
2 Junapiplya Once in 2 years Once in 4 Years<br />
3 Jivapar Once in 3 years Once in 3 Years<br />
4 Dolatpar Once in 1 years Once in 4 Years<br />
5 Sanathali<br />
Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-<strong>11</strong> 29
DWDU, Rajkot<br />
Table no. <strong>11</strong>: Soil Erosion<br />
Cause Type <strong>of</strong> erosion Area affected (ha) Run <strong>of</strong>f (mm/ year] Average soil loss<br />
(Tonnes/ ha/ year)<br />
Water erosion<br />
A Sheet 1258.05 500 150.96<br />
B Rill 1677.34 550 419.34<br />
C Gully 5451.36 475 1907.97<br />
D Ravenous - -<br />
Sub-Total 8386.5 2478.27<br />
Wind erosion - -<br />
Total 8386.5 2478.27<br />
Table no. <strong>11</strong>.1: Soil Salinity/Alkalinity (Salinity ingress)<br />
Name <strong>of</strong> the Village Survey Number Soil pH<br />
Kanpar<br />
Junapiplya<br />
Jivapar<br />
Dolatpar<br />
Sanathali<br />
NA<br />
Type <strong>of</strong> Salinity<br />
(Inherent/Ingress)<br />
Table: 12. Climatic Conditions (Last six years annual rainfall, maximum and minimum temperature <strong>of</strong> Jasdan taluka )<br />
SI. No. Year Rainfall (in mm)<br />
Temperature (°C)<br />
Max.<br />
Min.<br />
1 2005 624 43 7<br />
2<br />
3<br />
2006<br />
2007<br />
896<br />
900<br />
45<br />
44<br />
6.5<br />
7.5<br />
4 2008 698 43 7.5<br />
5 2009 354 46 6<br />
6 2010 550 42 10<br />
Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-<strong>11</strong> 30
DWDU, Rajkot<br />
The project area is completely dependent on rainfall. The rainfall is scanty which has resulted in recurrent phenomenon <strong>of</strong> drought<br />
two to three years. The average rainfall <strong>of</strong> this area is about 750 mm. The area faces continual crop failure that comes on whenever<br />
there is a shortfall in the total quantum <strong>of</strong> rain. However, even more serious are the gaps in rain even in years when the total<br />
rainfall is considered normal. These gaps at crucial periods in the crop growth cycle can prove fatal for the crop. However, through<br />
careful water harvesting, in-situ moisture conservation and a drought-pro<strong>of</strong>ing strategy <strong>of</strong> dryland agriculture, these gaps can<br />
easily be plugged and the crops saved.<br />
3.1.3 Slope<br />
The slope <strong>of</strong> the watershed was calculated based on topographic elevation (contours and spot height) from satellite maps and<br />
provided by BISAG, Gandhinagar. These maps will help in recommendation/implementation <strong>of</strong> suitable land management<br />
practices in association <strong>of</strong> other thematic information.<br />
Table no. 13: Physiography and relief<br />
Project name Elevation Slope range (%) Major streams<br />
Kanpar 0-15 meters 0-5% Kanapriyo,Kharavokli<br />
,Ajavalivokli,Bhadvavokli,<br />
Junapiplya 0-10 meters 0-6% Sarjuvokli, Morliyovokli,Kharivokli,<br />
Kadakdharvokli,pativokli<br />
Jivapar 0-12 meters 0-5% Karnuki,Motivokli,Hadiyanivokli,Patani<br />
vokli, Kharinivokli<br />
Dolatpar 0-10 meters 0-5% Bhagdo,Dokamardavokli,Derivokli,bha<br />
Dvokli, Bhugriyatvokli<br />
Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-<strong>11</strong> 31
DWDU, Rajkot<br />
Sanathali 0-10 meters 0-5% Bhangvokli, Bhadar, Parmariyo, Vokli<br />
3.2 Land and Agriculture<br />
The average land holding is 1.99 ha. The total net sown area is 5921.8 ha where in more than 4846.08 ha, 2 times farming is done<br />
in the watershed villages. The main crops under agriculture are cotton, groundnut, wheat, cumin, garlic, pulses and fodder grass.<br />
Some <strong>of</strong> the farmers take up rainfed castor if the rains are good. Now a days farmers has started growing vegetables on small<br />
patches <strong>of</strong> lands in Jivapar (Rabi) season for which water is fetched from the earthen dams through canal. The land conservation<br />
measures such as earthen bunds and farm bunds in the area will help them to take up a rabi crop <strong>of</strong> gram or cumin in the residual<br />
moisture. Since last 3-4 yrs Bt. cotton farming taking place at a higher rate.<br />
Table no. 14: Land ownership details<br />
Sl<br />
no<br />
Village<br />
Total owned land<br />
Gen OBC SC ST<br />
HHs giving<br />
land on lease<br />
HHs taking<br />
land on<br />
lease<br />
1 Kanpar 500 103 15 0 0 0<br />
2 Junapiplya 300 27 8 0 0 0<br />
3 Jivapar 535 15 6 0 0 0<br />
4 Dolatpar 375 42 3 0 0 0<br />
5 Sanathali 1640 56 7 0 0 0<br />
Total 3350 243 39 0 0 0<br />
Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-<strong>11</strong> 32
DWDU, Rajkot<br />
Table no. 15: Agriculture<br />
Sl no Village Net sown area (ha)<br />
One time Two times Three times<br />
1 Kanpar <strong>11</strong>5 521.08 100<br />
2 Junapiplya 235 892.32 40<br />
3 Jivapar <strong>11</strong>5 902.68 70<br />
4 Dolatpar 57 315 28<br />
5 Sanathali 200.2 2215 <strong>11</strong>5<br />
Total 722.2 4846.08 353<br />
Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-<strong>11</strong> 33
DWDU, Rajkot<br />
3.2.1 Irrigation<br />
The irrigated area is <strong>11</strong>41 ha, which is 15.72 % <strong>of</strong> the total agricultural area <strong>of</strong> the village. Main source <strong>of</strong> irrigation is from<br />
previously constructed pond, check dams ponds or wells/tubes. A few farmers <strong>of</strong> Juna Pipliya and Jivapar get irrigation to their<br />
field by check dams and from earthen dams which were previously constructed by different departments. Farmers <strong>of</strong> all the cluster<br />
villages get water for irrigation from the previously constructed check dams in Hariyali scheme.<br />
Table no. 16: Irrigation<br />
SI<br />
no<br />
Village<br />
Source 1 : Canal Source 2 : Pond/Earthen dam Source 3 : Check dam<br />
Availability Net area Gross area Availability Net area Gross Availability Net area<br />
months<br />
months (Ha) area months (Ha)<br />
(Ha)<br />
1 Kanpar - - - 5 <strong>11</strong>5 185 3 84 97<br />
2 Junapiplya - - - 6 168 190 4 78 250<br />
3 Jivapar 6 325 532 3 25 73 3 36 95<br />
4 Dolatpar - - - 6 <strong>11</strong>0 130 4 86 135<br />
Sanathali 2.5 75 <strong>11</strong>5 3 75 <strong>11</strong>0<br />
3 Total - 325 532 493 693 17 359 687<br />
Gross<br />
area<br />
(Ha)<br />
Crop details and Productivity: The productivity is low not because that the land is unproductive or the farmer's lack the<br />
skills to managing their crop but it is due to lack <strong>of</strong> source <strong>of</strong> irrigation, salty water and scarcity <strong>of</strong> rain.<br />
The cluster villages come under draught prone zone. So farmers grow crop according to the rainfall. If they get good rainfall<br />
they generally grow high value crops as discussed above. In case <strong>of</strong> low rainfall they go for cotton, castor, pearl millet. So we can say that<br />
monsoon decides cropping patterns <strong>of</strong> the project villages.<br />
Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-<strong>11</strong> 34
DWDU, Rajkot<br />
Table no. 17: Crop details<br />
Sl<br />
no<br />
Village<br />
Kharif (Monsoon)<br />
Crop 1 Cotton Kg/Ha Crop 2 Groundnut<br />
Crop<br />
3<br />
Pulses Kg/Ha<br />
Area Production Productivity Area Production Productivity Area Production Productivity<br />
1 Kanpar 521.08 839981 1612 528 593509 <strong>11</strong>23 288 2<strong>11</strong>680 735<br />
2 Junapiplya 892.32 1274054 1428 99 109467 <strong>11</strong>06 33 23793 721<br />
3 Jivapar 902.68 1264673 1401 380 485876 1279 13.84 10629 768<br />
4 Dolatpar 315 424305 1347 230 287546 1250 37.1 26527 715<br />
5 Sanathali 2215 2932660 1324 601 658095 1095 200.2 142542 712<br />
Sl<br />
no<br />
Village<br />
Rabi (Winter)<br />
Crop<br />
Crop<br />
Crop<br />
Wheat Kg/Ha<br />
Jiru Kg/Ha<br />
1<br />
2<br />
3<br />
Garlic/Fodder Kg/Ha<br />
Area Production Productivity Area Production Productivity Area Production Productivity<br />
1 Kanpar 752.6 1810281.5 2405 369.8 369800 1000 100 345000 3450<br />
2 Junapiplya 334 738123.3 2210 160 156960 981 40 142400 3560<br />
3 Jivapar 596.1 1431832.2 2402 130 128050 985 70 266000 3800<br />
4 Dolatpar 212 376350.88 1775 85 73355 863 28 95900 3425<br />
5 Sanathali 1700 2975408 1750 140 125300 895 <strong>11</strong>5 328325 2855<br />
Reasons <strong>of</strong> Low productivity <strong>of</strong> various crops<br />
Over a period <strong>of</strong> time by continuous usage <strong>of</strong> fertilizers, pesticides and insecticides, there is deterioration in the quality <strong>of</strong> soil<br />
particularly reduction <strong>of</strong> carbon content and increase <strong>of</strong> salinity. One <strong>of</strong> the reasons ascribed to low response <strong>of</strong> bio-fertilizers<br />
in dry lands is their low status <strong>of</strong> soil organic matter. Rejuvenation <strong>of</strong> soil characteristics is an important area to tackle, with<br />
specific emphasis on recovery <strong>of</strong> its nutritional value. More thrust need to be given on adopting methods such as multicropping,<br />
rotation <strong>of</strong> crops and organic farming. Organic farming, nutrient management continues to be a focal issue in dry<br />
Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-<strong>11</strong> 35
DWDU, Rajkot<br />
lands as the fertilizer use is not likely to pick up significantly unless water supply is assured. Soil fertility in dry lands can be<br />
sustained only through maintenance <strong>of</strong> organic matter and achieving better fertilizer-use efficiency through integration <strong>of</strong><br />
moisture-conservation practices along with soil-fertility management.<br />
Quality <strong>of</strong> Seeds: Good quality seed, fertilizer and pesticide are important factor in agriculture productivity. The use <strong>of</strong> good quality<br />
leads to higher land productivity. In project villages, however, there are two limitations in the use <strong>of</strong> fertilizer. First these<br />
fertilizers are most useful in irrigated condition. The agricultural land <strong>of</strong> the cluster villages however totally depend on rainfall.<br />
In villages mostly farmers use nitrogenous fertilizers especially urea. This has resulted in disproportionate use <strong>of</strong> fertilizer<br />
depleting the quality <strong>of</strong> land.<br />
Traditional farming methods and less water conservation structures: This is the factor that leads low productivity. There is<br />
lot <strong>of</strong> ignorance about the use <strong>of</strong> new farming methods and technologies such as multiple cropping. Due to no farm bunding<br />
and less water conservation structures sheet and rill erosion is prominent and top soil eroded along with fertilizers.<br />
Erratic/Low rainfall: The Villagers mainly depend on monsoon. Water is essential input in agriculture. Due to the absence <strong>of</strong> proper<br />
<br />
irrigation facility, 100% <strong>of</strong> the total cultivated area depends on the uncertain monsoon. Therefore the success or failure <strong>of</strong> the<br />
monsoon determines the success or failure <strong>of</strong> agriculture production. The rains, as a source <strong>of</strong> irrigation, are unreliable due to<br />
two factors;<br />
Untimely Rainfall: The rains are sometimes received when the crops are ready for harvesting. The ready crop may be ruined due<br />
to untimely rain.<br />
Inadequate Rainfall: The dependence on the uncertain rainfall is a factor that contributes to low productivity <strong>of</strong> land.<br />
Lack <strong>of</strong> <strong>Rural</strong> Credit: Farmers face so many problems for rural credit and it leads to low agricultural productivity. Farmers need<br />
credit mainly for the purchase <strong>of</strong> various inputs such as seed, fertilizers, and pesticides and for repair <strong>of</strong> implements. They use<br />
long term credit for buying land, and for investment to improve the quality <strong>of</strong> land, buying the new implements and improving<br />
irrigation facilities.<br />
Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-<strong>11</strong> 36
DWDU, Rajkot<br />
3.3 Livestock<br />
The cluster villages have total <strong>of</strong> 901 cows and 1558 number <strong>of</strong> buffaloes out <strong>of</strong> which majority are <strong>of</strong> local breed, there are 1232<br />
bullock, 643 goats 719 sheep and 423 animals in others category. Due to less surface water availability, the fodder and pasture<br />
area for their animals has decreased. This leads to migration to other parts <strong>of</strong> the state with their herds <strong>of</strong> goats and sheep.<br />
Table no. 18: Livestock<br />
SI Village Buffalo Cow Total Milk Goat<br />
no<br />
(Buffalo+Cow]<br />
Sheep Bullock Hen Others<br />
No Milk No Milk No Milk<br />
1 Kanpar 136 46920 75 <strong>11</strong>812.5 58732.5 107 2087 <strong>11</strong>0 197 27<br />
2 Junapiplya 144 43200 139 22935 66135 92 1794 81 438 184<br />
3 Jivapar 299 <strong>11</strong>6610 236 46020 162630 80 1560 75 173 188<br />
4 Dolatpar 19 5985 21 3937.5 9922.5 19 371 3 44 15<br />
5 Sanathali 960 282240 430 80625 362865 345 6727.5 450 380 9<br />
Total 1558 494955 901 165330 660285 643 12539.5 719 1232 423<br />
Table no. 19: Drinking water<br />
SI no Village Ground water table (mt) Source <strong>of</strong> drinking water Availability in months Quality<br />
1<br />
2<br />
Kanpar 15-20 mt<br />
SSNL Pipe connection 12 (once in 2 Dayssummer)<br />
2 Junapiplya SSNL Pipe connection 12 (once in 2 Days)-<br />
summer<br />
3 Jivapar SSNL Pipe connection 12 (once in 2 Days)- Good<br />
4 Dolatpar SSNL Pipe connection 12 (once in Days)- Good<br />
5 Sanathali<br />
SSNL Pipe connection 12 (once in Days)- Good<br />
Good<br />
Good<br />
Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-<strong>11</strong> 37
DWDU, Rajkot<br />
Table no. 20: Details <strong>of</strong> Common Property Resources<br />
S.<br />
No.<br />
1<br />
Names<br />
<strong>of</strong><br />
project<br />
<strong>IWMP</strong>-<br />
<strong>11</strong><br />
CPR<br />
Particulars<br />
Total Area (ha)<br />
Area owned/ In possession <strong>of</strong><br />
Govt.<br />
Any other<br />
Pvt. persons (specify PRI (Pl.<br />
deptt.)<br />
Specify)<br />
Wasteland/ degraded<br />
land<br />
10.7 5<br />
Pastures 225.1 45<br />
Orchards<br />
Forest 100.2<br />
Village Ponds 8<br />
Check dams <strong>11</strong>8<br />
Canal<br />
Community Buildings 5<br />
Weekly Markets<br />
Permanent markets<br />
Temples/ Places <strong>of</strong><br />
worship<br />
12<br />
Area available for treatment (ha)<br />
Pvt.<br />
persons<br />
Govt.<br />
(specify<br />
deptt.)<br />
PRI<br />
Any other<br />
(Pl.<br />
Specify)<br />
3.5 Socio-Economic Pr<strong>of</strong>ile<br />
3.5.1 Demographic Status: Cluster villages have total family <strong>of</strong> 2425 numbers. There are 12829 persons in the project villages<br />
(From the door to door survey report), out <strong>of</strong> which 6338 male and 6491 female members. The sex ratio is 999 females to 1000<br />
males. The average family size is 5.3 percent. Four major caste systems prevail in the village namely: Patel, Darbar, Rabari and<br />
Harijans. Around 9.27 % <strong>of</strong> the population <strong>of</strong> the cluster villges belongs to SC families. Majority <strong>of</strong> population is involved in<br />
agriculture and animal husbandry.<br />
Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-<strong>11</strong> 38
DWDU, Rajkot<br />
Table no. 21: Demographic information<br />
SI no Village Population SC ST<br />
Total Male Female Total Male Female % Total Male Female %<br />
1 Kanpar 1973 1001 972 289 149 140 15 0 - -<br />
2 Junapipalya 1606 794 812 <strong>11</strong>4 58 56 7 9 5 4 0.56<br />
3 Jivapar 2298 <strong>11</strong>63 <strong>11</strong>35 190 100 90 8 64 32 32 2.78<br />
4 Dolatpar 1047 562 485 91 46 45 9 1 1 0 0.09<br />
5 Sanathali 5905 2895 3010 506 259 247 9 0 - -<br />
6 Total 12829 6415 6414 <strong>11</strong>90 612 578 9.27 74 38 36 0.57<br />
Table no. 22: Literacy rate<br />
SI no Village<br />
Literacy<br />
Literacy % above Literacy %<br />
Total % Male % Female % age 14<br />
below age 14<br />
1 Kanpar 1095 55.50 629 57.44 466 42.56 84 16<br />
2 Junapiplya 881 54.86 466 52.89 415 47.<strong>11</strong> 89 <strong>11</strong><br />
3 Jivapar 1341 58.36 775 57.79 566 42.21 92 8<br />
4 Dolatpar 560 53.49 286 51.07 244 43.57 84 16<br />
5 Sanathali 3646 61.74 1939 53.18 1707 46.82 94 6<br />
5 Total 7523 58.64 4095 54.43 3398 45.17 88.6 <strong>11</strong>.4<br />
3.5.2 Migration Pattern: The declining yield and product, steady erosion <strong>of</strong> soil fertility and diminishing returns to the<br />
farmers and almost zero investment on land development has set in motion a dynamic problem <strong>of</strong> degradation. Many small and<br />
marginal seek alternate livelihood means and work as wage labour in nearby areas. Low rainfall results in very little fodder<br />
availability in the locality. On account <strong>of</strong> agriculture and animal husbandry providing only part time employment for some part<br />
<strong>of</strong> the year, the people migrate for a better half <strong>of</strong> the year for wage labour. Migrate to nearby cities like Surat and parts <strong>of</strong><br />
Suarashtra as daily wages agricultural labours and factory workers. Lack <strong>of</strong> fodder availability and grazing land for smaller<br />
Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-<strong>11</strong> 39
DWDU, Rajkot<br />
ruminant also forces these farmers to migrate to other places.<br />
Table no. 23: Migration details<br />
SI no Village Total Migration<br />
Migration by months<br />
population Total Male Female Up to 3<br />
months<br />
3-6 months More than 6<br />
months<br />
Main reason<br />
for migration<br />
Income during<br />
migration /<br />
month<br />
1 Kanpar 1973 58 35 23 - 25 33<br />
Better Rs 4200<br />
2 Junapiplya 1606 35 23 12 - 12 23<br />
opportunities /month<br />
3 Jivapar 2298 109 65 44 - 75 34<br />
4 Dolatpar 1047 49 34 15 - 21 28<br />
and income<br />
5 Sanathali 5905 182 109 73 - 65 <strong>11</strong>7<br />
Total 12829 433 266 167 - 198 235<br />
Table no. 24: Poverty<br />
SI no Village Total Household<br />
BPL<br />
%<strong>of</strong> BPLHH<br />
Total Land less HH % <strong>of</strong> land less HH<br />
0-16 17-20 Total<br />
1 Kanpar 425 126 219 335 78% 127 30%<br />
2 Junapiplya 251 65 125 190 75% 87 34%<br />
3 Jivapar 351 8 <strong>11</strong>9 127 36% 105 30%<br />
4 Dolatpar 180 13 33 46 25% 45 25%<br />
5 Sanathali 1218 74 156 230 17.90% 485 40%<br />
Total 2425 286 652 928 45% 849 32%<br />
3.5.3 Infrastructure facilities<br />
All watershed villages are well connected with Jasdan taluka with pucca roads. Each village has electricity connectivity under<br />
Jyotigram Yojana <strong>of</strong> the <strong>State</strong> Government. Nearly 90 per cent <strong>of</strong> households in the villages have their personal electric meters. The<br />
villages have primary school with all facilities like two personal computers. For middle and higher secondary education, the<br />
students have to go to Jasdan and gondal 25-40 kilometres away the villages. The villagers depend upon Sanathali primary health<br />
Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-<strong>11</strong> 40
DWDU, Rajkot<br />
centre for health problems. Each village comes under their individual Gram Panchayat with Panchayat <strong>of</strong>fice at their own village.<br />
Table no. 25: Village infrastructure<br />
SI Village Pucca Schools<br />
Colleges Post Office Banks<br />
no<br />
road to LP UP HS (Number) (Distance) (Number) Distance Milk Milk Other Any other<br />
from collection cooperative cooperatives institution<br />
the<br />
nearest centre (Number) /CBIs<br />
village<br />
(Y/N)<br />
market<br />
yard<br />
(Number)<br />
(Number)<br />
1 Kanpar Y Y Y N N Y 6 KM 28 KM 1 1 - -<br />
2 Junapiplya Y Y Y N N 5 KM 5 KM 22 KM - 1 - -<br />
3 Jivapar Y Y Y N N Y 1 NO 20 KM 1 1 - -<br />
4 Dolatpar Y Y Y N N 5 KM 5 KM 30 KM - 1 - -<br />
5 Sanathali Y Y Y Y N Y 2 NO 25 KM 2 1 - -<br />
Table no. 26: Facilities / HH assets<br />
SI<br />
no<br />
Village<br />
HHs with<br />
electricity<br />
HHs with<br />
safety<br />
latrines<br />
HHs with phones HHs with vehicle<br />
Landline Mobile 2 -wheeler 4-<br />
wheeler<br />
HHs with<br />
TV set<br />
HHs with<br />
cooking<br />
gas<br />
HHs with<br />
Drinking<br />
water<br />
1 Kanpar 425 250 15 410 210 60 380 <strong>11</strong>5 390 <strong>11</strong>0<br />
2 Junapiplya 251 130 8 230 180 45 215 90 230 <strong>11</strong>5<br />
3 Jivapar 351 230 12 335 209 75 335 160 345 160<br />
4 Dolatpar 180 80 2 160 105 20 <strong>11</strong>5 60 159 30<br />
5 Sanathali 1218 689 40 <strong>11</strong>85 860 260 802 615 1080 604<br />
Total 2425 1379 77 2320 1564 460 1847 1040 2204 1019<br />
HHs<br />
with<br />
freedge<br />
3.5.4 Livelihood pattern: The villagers earn their livelihood from animal husbandry and agriculture, and during lean seasons<br />
they go as daily wage labourers in thresher industries, as masons, diamond polishing and in handicraft unit at Jasdan taluka.<br />
Another major occupation <strong>of</strong> the people is business and service and working in ginning & oil mills and diamond polishing<br />
Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-<strong>11</strong> 41
DWDU, Rajkot<br />
industries.<br />
Table no. 27: Per capita Income<br />
SI no Village Agriculture Animal husbandry Casual labour Others(Services& Total<br />
Business)<br />
1 Kanpar 39703161 463800 2450000 3885450 465024<strong>11</strong><br />
2 Junapiplya 41713917 14<strong>11</strong>180 2814500 3109500 49049097<br />
3 Jivapar 63849232 976230 5150200 2253800 72229462<br />
4 Dolatpar 26507103 2<strong>11</strong>2000 3713000 2073000 34405103<br />
5 Sanathali<br />
82535515 10560000 13565000 13365000<br />
120025515<br />
Total 254308928 15523210 27692700 24686750 3222<strong>11</strong>588<br />
Table no.28: Dependence on Forest/CPR<br />
Benefit type<br />
Benefit type 1 Benefit type 2<br />
Sl no Village<br />
2<br />
% sells Income % sells Income % sells Income<br />
1 Kanpar NA<br />
2 Junapiplya NA<br />
3 Jivapar NA<br />
4 Dolatpar NA<br />
5 Sanathali NA<br />
Total<br />
income<br />
Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-<strong>11</strong> 42
DWDU, Rajkot<br />
Table no. 29: Livelihood pattern (Occupational distribution)<br />
Animal<br />
Sl<br />
Total<br />
Village<br />
Agriculture husbandry<br />
no<br />
workforce<br />
(AH)<br />
Agriculture<br />
+ AH<br />
Agriculture/<br />
Casual<br />
labour<br />
Services<br />
Handicraft/<br />
Business<br />
1 Kanpar<br />
1032 481 53 208 107 12 18 153<br />
2 Junapiplya 886 466 32 139 104 8 3 134<br />
3 Jivapar 657 <strong>11</strong>2 215 149 32 7 178 657<br />
4 Dolatpar 587 327 22 133 8 31 66<br />
5 Sanathali 2921 2241 205 71 240 22 54 88<br />
Total 6083 3627 527 700 491 49 284 1098<br />
Others<br />
Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-<strong>11</strong> 43
DWDU, Rajkot<br />
CHAPTER - 4<br />
WATERSHED ACTIVITIES<br />
Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-<strong>11</strong> 44
DWDU, Rajkot<br />
Watershed Activities<br />
Watershed management as a strategy has been adopted by Government <strong>of</strong> India especially in the rainfed regions <strong>of</strong> semiarid<br />
tropics. These regions are characterized by low and undepependable rain, low soil fertility, poor infrastructure development,<br />
comparatively low literacy and medium incidence <strong>of</strong> migration. The inheritant low fertility <strong>of</strong> crops results in lower productivity <strong>of</strong><br />
crops which have a very low biological efficiency.<br />
Several studies have identified that there is a dire need <strong>of</strong> a systematic and scientific approach to deal with watershed<br />
development. The common guidelines generate a fresh and flexible framework for the next generation watershed development.<br />
4.1. Scientific Planning:<br />
a) Cluster Approach<br />
This envisages a broader vision <strong>of</strong> Geo-hydrological unit which involves treating a cluster <strong>of</strong> micro-watershed. The project<br />
consists <strong>of</strong> nine micro-watersheds namely 5G1B9c1b, 5G1B9d1f, 5G1B9d2a, 5G1B9d2b, 5G1B9c1g, 5G1B9a1e, 5G1B9a1f,<br />
5G1B9a1h, 5G1B9a1g as their respective codes.<br />
b) Use <strong>of</strong> GIS and Remote sensing for planning<br />
Remote sensing and GIS plays an important role in the study <strong>of</strong> natural resources and helps in planning water resources<br />
development. One <strong>of</strong> the greatest advantages <strong>of</strong> using remote sensing data for hydrological investigations and monitoring is its<br />
ability to generate information in spatial and temporal domain, which is very crucial for successful analysis, prediction and<br />
validation Use <strong>of</strong> various high science tools has been promoted at various stages <strong>of</strong> watershed development.<br />
i) Prioritization<br />
Geographical Information System (GIS) has been used for prioritization process. Various layer maps were created like Geomorphological,<br />
Soil, BPL Population, SC/ST population, Ground water Status, Drinking water situation and slope percent. These were<br />
all given proper weightage according to the DoLR specification. This helped in prioritization <strong>of</strong> various watershed areas.<br />
Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-<strong>11</strong> 45
DWDU, Rajkot<br />
ii) Planning<br />
A action plan matrix has been formulated by <strong>State</strong> Level Nodal Agency(SLNA) taking into account various features like the slope<br />
percent, soil Depth, Soil Texture, Soil erosion in the area for wasteland, forest land and agricultural land.<br />
Global positioning System (GPS) was used to identify each and every water conservation structures available in the project area.<br />
This will be used to create a map. Contour Map <strong>of</strong> vertical interval <strong>of</strong> 1 meter at a scale <strong>of</strong> 1:8000 was used for identifying various<br />
location specific for soil and water conservation structures.<br />
iii) Hydrological modelling<br />
Hydrology modelling technique has been used for locating drainage, stream length, flow direction, sink, and flow accumulation. This<br />
model overlaid over cadastral map hel to calculate the catchment area <strong>of</strong> each structures like the check dam with the help <strong>of</strong><br />
contour map provided by BISAG and physical survey on site. This has helped to remove the human error which generally occurring<br />
while calculating the catchment area <strong>of</strong> a check dam.<br />
c) Base line Survey<br />
i) Socio-Economic Survey<br />
The primary data was generated through questionnaire surveys in all the villages. The questionnaire was structured so as to derive<br />
the information related to the objectives set forth. Mostly talked to<br />
• Head <strong>of</strong> the families<br />
• Mostly females (between 65% and 70%)<br />
• Mostly younger adults (Age group : 25 – 44)<br />
• High School education<br />
• Sarpanch and Talati <strong>of</strong> respective Gram Panchayats.<br />
Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-<strong>11</strong> 46
DWDU, Rajkot<br />
I.E. C activities<br />
Field to field survey<br />
Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-<strong>11</strong> 47
DWDU, Rajkot<br />
PRA Exercise<br />
PRA Exercise<br />
Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-<strong>11</strong> 48
DWDU, Rajkot<br />
• Farmers, Agricultural labours, Diamond polishing workers, handicraft unit workers, electric drum making units and<br />
workers <strong>of</strong> thresher units.<br />
• Cattle Breeders<br />
• Landless labour<br />
The questionnaire was divided into nine modules through which information is extracted pertaining to<br />
1. Village details<br />
2. Population details<br />
3. Water supply details<br />
4. Water source details<br />
5. Questions about community engagement<br />
6. Questions about Livelihood<br />
7. Awareness about Specific programme: Watershed<br />
8. Desire to do more activities related to occupation<br />
9. Productivity <strong>of</strong> farms<br />
ii) Bio-physical Survey: Field to field survey was also carried out in the farms, community land, pasture land and land under Gram<br />
Panchayat. It also includes the soil pr<strong>of</strong>iles, number <strong>of</strong> wells in the area, crop taken in the field, cropping pattern, fertilizer used and<br />
various sources <strong>of</strong> irrigation in the field. The details <strong>of</strong> agriculture as well as pasture lands <strong>of</strong> the village where the existing<br />
condition and structures to be proposed, were written down. Almost all the farmers <strong>of</strong> the village were there to support the survey<br />
team. The purpose <strong>of</strong> the survey was also to understand water availability, patterns <strong>of</strong> water use and peoples’ understanding &<br />
perceptions about both surface and groundwater resources in this area. Agreements will be done on the basis <strong>of</strong> such detailed<br />
Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-<strong>11</strong> 49
DWDU, Rajkot<br />
work for water judicious water sharing and repair and maintenance <strong>of</strong> structures. This survey also looked at the pattern <strong>of</strong> surface<br />
and groundwater use and the basic understanding <strong>of</strong> farmers regarding groundwater recharge and discharge. This understanding<br />
was expected to help in improved planning for any watershed programme and to develop longer-term protocols <strong>of</strong> groundwater<br />
management in respective areas.<br />
iii) Village level survey for secondary data collection: Whole Village information in a separate sheet was collected. The<br />
secondary data was obtained through Census reports (2001). Data pertaining to social pr<strong>of</strong>ile is also collected through Census<br />
reports. Secondary data related to different kinds <strong>of</strong> capital assets were collected from different departments <strong>of</strong> Government<br />
agencies such as Revenue Office, Primary Health Center, District <strong>Rural</strong> development Agency initiative-SGSY Programme <strong>of</strong>fice,<br />
working on poverty alleviation, Village Panchyat and development societies etc.<br />
Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-<strong>11</strong> 50
DWDU, Rajkot<br />
Table no. 30: Details <strong>of</strong> Scientific Planning and Inputs in <strong>IWMP</strong> projects<br />
S.<br />
No.<br />
Scientific criteria/ inputs used<br />
Whether scientific criteria<br />
was used<br />
(A) Planning<br />
Cluster approach<br />
Yes<br />
Whether technical back-stopping for the project has been arranged? If yes, mention the<br />
name <strong>of</strong> the Institute<br />
Yes<br />
Baseline survey<br />
Yes<br />
Hydro-geological survey<br />
No<br />
Contour mapping<br />
Yes<br />
Participatory Net Planning (PNP)<br />
Yes<br />
Remote sensing data-especially soil/ crop/ run-<strong>of</strong>f cover<br />
Yes<br />
Ridge to Valley treatment<br />
Yes<br />
Online IT connectivity between<br />
Yes<br />
(1) Project and DRDA cell/ZP Yes<br />
(2) DRDA and SLNA Yes<br />
(3) SLNA and DoLR Yes<br />
Availability <strong>of</strong> GIS layers<br />
Yes<br />
1. Cadastral map Yes<br />
2. Village boundaries Yes<br />
3. Drainage Yes<br />
4. Soil (Soil nutrient status) Yes<br />
5. Land use Yes<br />
6. Ground water status Yes<br />
7. Watershed boundaries Yes<br />
8. Activity Yes<br />
Crop simulation models #<br />
Integrated coupled analyzer/ near infrared visible spectroscopy/ medium spectroscopy<br />
for high speed soil nutrient analysis<br />
Normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI)#<br />
Weather Station<br />
Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-<strong>11</strong> 51
DWDU, Rajkot<br />
Yes<br />
(B) Inputs<br />
Yes<br />
1. Bio-pesticides Yes<br />
2. Organic manures Yes<br />
3. Vermicompost Yes<br />
4. Bio-fertilizer Yes<br />
5. Water saving devices Yes<br />
6. Mechanized tools/ implements Yes<br />
7. Bio-fencing Yes<br />
8. Nutrient budgeting No<br />
9. Automatic water level recorders & sediment samplers No<br />
d) Participatory <strong>Rural</strong> Appraisal (PRA)<br />
In order to understand the social, economic and political aspect <strong>of</strong> all the villages <strong>of</strong> the cluster, we conducted Participatory<br />
<strong>Rural</strong> Appraisal (PRA) exercise with the help <strong>of</strong> the villagers on 02/09/<strong>11</strong> in Kanpar, 01/07/<strong>11</strong> in Juna pipilya, 8/7/<strong>11</strong> in<br />
Jivapar,12/7/<strong>11</strong> in dolatpar and 02/08/<strong>11</strong> in Sanathali . It was really a useful tool to appreciate the village in its totality. We had the<br />
opportunity to interact with more than 300 numbers <strong>of</strong> people in Sanathali and <strong>11</strong>0 peple in Juna Pipilya village. To reach a<br />
concrete conclusion it was requested to few villagers for focussed discussion and it was entertained. As per their convenience<br />
focussed group discussion was conducted at the high school in Sanathali and in primary school in Dolatpar. In majority <strong>of</strong> the<br />
discussion, we listened to them carefully and tried to appreciate the discussion. Output generated through these exercise is placed<br />
below.<br />
(i) Resource Map: - Through resource map we came to know about all the residential pattern <strong>of</strong> village, community pasture<br />
land, farm areas, about the river etc. It also gave us a fair idea about the pasture land, other land distribution pattern and different<br />
resources <strong>of</strong> the village.<br />
(ii) Social Map: - After this exercise we came to know the approximate location <strong>of</strong> different institution <strong>of</strong> the village. During<br />
this exercise we also had informal discussions with the participants about the importance <strong>of</strong> these institutions. Important location<br />
Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-<strong>11</strong> 52
DWDU, Rajkot<br />
pointed out during this exercise was Community Centre, Panchayat Bhavan, temple, Primary School etc. We cross checked all the<br />
location.<br />
(iii) Seasonal Diagram:- With this exercise we came to know about the major engagements <strong>of</strong> villagers across the twelve<br />
months <strong>of</strong> the year. We found that rain fed agriculture and animal husbandry keep them busy at least for seven to eight months <strong>of</strong><br />
the year. About drinking water they informed that, situation in the month <strong>of</strong> March to June is really difficult as they get water once<br />
in three days.<br />
(iv) Tree matrix:- We came to know about different trees <strong>of</strong> the villages and their respective utilities as fruit, fuel, fodder,<br />
medicine , timber etc. Major trees pointed out by villagers under this exercise were Pipal, Neem, Bor, Lemon, Banyan and Pipara<br />
etc. Taking into consideration all the utilities it was found that the tree having maximum utility is Chiku and lemon.<br />
(v) Crop Pattern:- Agriculture is the primary source <strong>of</strong> liveihood for more than 70% household . After this exercise we came to<br />
know that there are two major cropping pattern Kharif and partially in Rabbi. Under Kharif cotton, ground nut and fodder crops<br />
and in rabi, major crops grown are wheat, cumin, gram and vegetables.<br />
(vi) Income-Expenditure Pot: - Under this exercise we came to know about the different sources <strong>of</strong> income <strong>of</strong> villagers and<br />
how the money earned by the villagers is being spent under different heads. It was found that major source <strong>of</strong> earning among<br />
villagers are farming, dairy, service etc. Major expenditure component were food, fuel, fodder, schooling <strong>of</strong> children, medicines,<br />
festivals, relatives, and paan etc.<br />
One focussed group discussion was organised to understand the status <strong>of</strong> different Self help Group operating in the village. This<br />
discussion concentrated around the activities <strong>of</strong> SHG, terms and conditions <strong>of</strong> membership, working pattern <strong>of</strong> different SHG and<br />
their role in the development <strong>of</strong> society etc<br />
Another curiosity in our mind was about the political institution <strong>of</strong> the village. Apart from different institution discussion<br />
was concentrated about gram panchayat issue. Here the major discussion point was participation <strong>of</strong> women and deprived section<br />
<strong>of</strong> the society in the decision making process, their representation in the panchayat. How the panchayat facilitates the process <strong>of</strong><br />
Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-<strong>11</strong> 53
DWDU, Rajkot<br />
development and poverty alleviation. In this process its relation with different institution <strong>of</strong> village like dispensary, Aanganwari<br />
Kendra, Primary School and High school was also discussed.<br />
The whole purpose was to identify the employment opportunities available during the different seasons in a year, income,<br />
expenditure, crisis management, daily activities and time allotted to each activity, the leisure time <strong>of</strong> men and women, and market<br />
network for agricultural produce etc. In the gender analysis, an attempt was made to find out the gendered division <strong>of</strong> labour, the<br />
status <strong>of</strong> women in relation to the right to use, to own and sell different household properties, the means <strong>of</strong> production <strong>of</strong> the<br />
household, and the role and participation <strong>of</strong> women in decision-making at intra household and community levels.<br />
To identify different problems faced by villagers a separate focussed discussion was carried out. The villagers were grouped in to<br />
different types as shown below to know all the details <strong>of</strong> the village in a stipulated time.<br />
Small and marginal farmers<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
Large farmers<br />
Landless farmers<br />
Women<br />
Gram Panchayat members<br />
Cattle grazing population<br />
Business man and women<br />
Problems Identification<br />
After analysis the information collected during PRA exercise, the main problems identified as<br />
Poor fertility <strong>of</strong> soil and low agricultural productivity<br />
Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-<strong>11</strong> 54
DWDU, Rajkot<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
Soil Erosion from farm land<br />
Improper Crop Rotation<br />
Less use <strong>of</strong> bio-fertilizers<br />
Almost negligible cultivation <strong>of</strong> arid fruits<br />
Less cultivation <strong>of</strong> vegetables<br />
Low milk production<br />
No use <strong>of</strong> vermi compost<br />
Lack <strong>of</strong> value addition practices<br />
Less availability <strong>of</strong> fodder<br />
Drinking Water<br />
Market (No nearby)<br />
Migration<br />
Sanitation Problems<br />
Less Nutritional Level<br />
Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-<strong>11</strong> 55
DWDU, Rajkot<br />
Sr. No.<br />
Name <strong>of</strong> the<br />
PRA Activity /<br />
FGD<br />
Table no.31: Details <strong>of</strong> PRA Activities conducted in the project area<br />
Date<br />
Number <strong>of</strong><br />
people<br />
present<br />
1 Kanpar 22 th Dec <strong>11</strong>2<br />
Lessons learnt / Understanding <strong>of</strong> the problem/situation<br />
Soil Erosion from farm land, No use <strong>of</strong> vermi compost, Less availability <strong>of</strong><br />
fodder, Soil Erosion from farm land, Chemical pollutants collected from<br />
farm unit, Low milk productivity and drinking water problem in summer<br />
and less water conservation structures.<br />
20 th<br />
2 Juna Pipilya Decembe 80<br />
r<br />
3 Jivapar 23 rd Dec 60<br />
4 Dolatpar 23 rd Dec 38<br />
5 Sanathali 21th Dec 153<br />
Soil Erosion from farm land, No use <strong>of</strong> vermi compost, Less availability <strong>of</strong><br />
fodder, Soil Erosion from farm land, Stream bank erosion, lack <strong>of</strong> road<br />
from farm to farm and farm to village ,Road submergence in rainy season<br />
and drinking water problem in summer<br />
Soil Erosion from farm land, No use <strong>of</strong> vermi compost, Less availability <strong>of</strong><br />
fodder, Soil Erosion from farm land, Low water table, ,lack <strong>of</strong> road from<br />
farm to farm and farm to village, road submergence in rainy season and<br />
drinking water problem in summer<br />
Soil Erosion from farm land, No use <strong>of</strong> vermi compost, Less availability <strong>of</strong><br />
fodder, Low milk production and drinking water problem in summer<br />
Soil Erosion from farm land, No use <strong>of</strong> vermi compost, Less availability <strong>of</strong><br />
fodder, Chemical pollutants collected from farm unit, Stream bank<br />
erosion and drinking water problem in summer<br />
Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-<strong>11</strong> 56
DWDU, Rajkot<br />
4.2. Institution Building<br />
i)Watershed Committee (WC)<br />
This is the general body <strong>of</strong> the residents constituted by Gram sabha <strong>of</strong> the watershed as well as farmers who own land within the<br />
watershed area registered under society Registration Act 1860. The Gram sabha meeting was held on 02/09/<strong>11</strong> in Kanpar,<br />
01/07/<strong>11</strong> in Juna pipilya, 8/7/<strong>11</strong> in Jivapar, 12/7/<strong>11</strong> in Dolatpar and 02/08/<strong>11</strong> in Sanathali where the watershed committee was<br />
formed taking in to account all caste, women representation and Gram panchayat members. Both President and Secretary <strong>of</strong> WC<br />
were selected after the first Watershed Committee meeting was held. The secretary will be a paid functionary <strong>of</strong> the watershed<br />
committee.The Watershed Committee with the help <strong>of</strong> the Watershed <strong>Development</strong> Team (WDT) shall facilitate resource-use<br />
agreements among the user groups based on the principle <strong>of</strong> equity and sustainability. Capacity building training to the watershed<br />
committee and village level institutions will be provided by WDT member. The watershed committee has a pivotal during various<br />
processes like the PRA and overall planning <strong>of</strong> various points.<br />
Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-<strong>11</strong> 57
DWDU, Rajkot<br />
Table no. 32.1: Watershed Committee details (Kanpar)<br />
Date <strong>of</strong> Name<br />
Registration<br />
Sl. Names <strong>of</strong><br />
as a Society<br />
No. WC<br />
(dd/mm/<br />
yyyy)<br />
1<br />
Watershed<br />
committee<br />
Kanpar<br />
Maganbhai<br />
Valajibhai<br />
Ujiya<br />
Atulpari<br />
Vajupari<br />
Gosai<br />
Nitaben<br />
Babubhai<br />
Chauhan<br />
Saralaben<br />
Maganbhai<br />
Ujiya<br />
Champaben<br />
Pragajibhai<br />
Ujiya<br />
Anuben<br />
Hareshbhai<br />
Vagh<br />
Sarojben<br />
Arvindbhai<br />
Sayaja<br />
Kacharabhai<br />
Chhaganbhai<br />
Kadavani<br />
UG SHG GP<br />
Designation M/F SC ST SF MF LF Landless<br />
Educational<br />
qualification<br />
Function/s<br />
assigned#<br />
President M Y Y 7 D<br />
Secretary M Y Y BA C<br />
Member F Y Y 5 A<br />
Member F Y Y 7 B<br />
Member F Y Y 5 I<br />
Member F Y Y Y 7 I-G<br />
Member F Y Y 8 I<br />
Member M Y Y 5 F-B-E<br />
Najabhai<br />
Karasanbhai Member M Y Y 10 B-H<br />
Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-<strong>11</strong> 58
DWDU, Rajkot<br />
Chavada<br />
Arajanbhai<br />
Jasabhai<br />
Vagh<br />
Chandubhai<br />
Babubhai<br />
Kadavani<br />
Ramanuj<br />
Manojbhai<br />
N.<br />
Member M Y Y Y 7 E-G<br />
Member M Y Y 10 B<br />
WDT M - - - - DCE Overall<br />
Table no. 32.2: Watershed Committee details (Junapiplya)<br />
Sl.<br />
No.<br />
1<br />
Names <strong>of</strong><br />
WC<br />
Watershed<br />
committee,<br />
Junapiplya<br />
Date <strong>of</strong><br />
Registration<br />
as a Society<br />
(dd/mm/<br />
yyyy)<br />
Name<br />
Rameshbhai<br />
Ramajibhai<br />
Sakariya<br />
Manojbhai<br />
Anakbhai<br />
Jebaliya<br />
Bhikhabhai<br />
Raghavbhai<br />
Vachhani<br />
Anakbhai<br />
Champabhai<br />
Jebaliya<br />
Arunaben<br />
UG SHG GP<br />
Designation M/F SC ST SF MF LF Landless<br />
Educational<br />
qualification<br />
Function/s<br />
assigned#<br />
President M Y Y 9 D<br />
Secretary M BA C<br />
Member M Y Y 7 A<br />
Member M Y Y 10 B<br />
Member F Y Y 12 I<br />
Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-<strong>11</strong> 59
DWDU, Rajkot<br />
Rameshbhai<br />
Pandya<br />
Lalajibhai<br />
Keshabhai<br />
Parsana<br />
Vilasben<br />
Jentibhai<br />
Parasana<br />
Dayaben<br />
Bhimajibhai<br />
Matiya<br />
Jadavbhai<br />
Bavabhai<br />
Nathani<br />
Jayaben<br />
Devabhai<br />
Solanki<br />
Vasantben<br />
Lalajibhai<br />
Kachhadiya<br />
Nitaben<br />
Karasanbhai<br />
Solanki<br />
Member M Y Y 8<br />
Member F Y Y 6 I-G<br />
Member F Y Y 4 I<br />
Member M Y Y 6 F-B-E<br />
Member F Y Y Y 8 B-H<br />
Member F Y Y 9 E-G<br />
Member<br />
F Y Y Y 4 B<br />
Viththalbhai<br />
Member<br />
Gokalbhai<br />
M Y Y 2<br />
Trapasiya<br />
Rekhaben<br />
Member<br />
Dalasukhbhai<br />
F Y Y 10<br />
Vaghela<br />
Baghabhai Member M Y Y <strong>11</strong><br />
Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-<strong>11</strong> 60
DWDU, Rajkot<br />
Sl.<br />
No.<br />
Ravatbhai<br />
Dhandhal<br />
Jadavbhai<br />
Bavabhai<br />
Nathani<br />
Ramanuj<br />
Manojbhai N.<br />
Member<br />
Member<br />
Table no. 32.3: Watershed Committee details (Jivapar )<br />
Date <strong>of</strong> Name<br />
Registration<br />
Names <strong>of</strong><br />
as a Society<br />
WC<br />
(dd/mm/<br />
yyyy)<br />
1<br />
Watershed<br />
committee,<br />
Jivapar<br />
Kishorbhai<br />
Gandubhai<br />
Bodar<br />
Anilbhai<br />
Hansarajbhai<br />
Tadhani<br />
Rameshbhai<br />
Hasamukhbhai<br />
Bodar<br />
Jayashriben<br />
Hasamukhbhai<br />
Mungala<br />
Manishaben<br />
Yogeshbhai<br />
Dodiya<br />
Bhagavanbhai<br />
Bachubhai<br />
Bodar<br />
Kanchanben<br />
M Y Y 6<br />
M DCE<br />
UG SHG GP<br />
Designation M/F SC ST SF MF LF Landless<br />
Educational<br />
qualification<br />
Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-<strong>11</strong> 61<br />
Function/s<br />
assigned#<br />
President M Y Y <strong>11</strong> D<br />
Secretary M Y BC0M C<br />
Member M Y Y Y 10 A<br />
Member F Y Y 7 B<br />
Member F Y Y <strong>11</strong> I<br />
Member M Y Y 5 I-G<br />
Member F Y Y 10 I
DWDU, Rajkot<br />
Kishorbhai<br />
Mungara<br />
Arvindbhai<br />
Palajibhai<br />
Dafad<br />
Nayanaben<br />
Manubhai<br />
Sathaliya<br />
Kantaben<br />
Rameshbhai<br />
Savaliya<br />
Devabhai<br />
Jethabhai<br />
Ratadiya<br />
Nimuben<br />
Nagajibhai<br />
Vaghasiya<br />
Manjuben<br />
Sureshbhai<br />
Damasiya<br />
Labhubhai<br />
Pragajibhai<br />
dholariya<br />
Pravinbhai<br />
Karsanbhai<br />
Bodar<br />
Babubhai<br />
Dudabhai<br />
Bodar<br />
Sureshbhai K.<br />
Makavana<br />
Member M Y Y Y Y 7 F-B-E<br />
Member F Y Y 8 B-H<br />
Member F Y Y 6 E-G<br />
Member M Y Y 4 B<br />
Member F Y Y 8 A<br />
Member F Y Y 8 J<br />
Member F Y Y 6 A<br />
Member M Y Y 10<br />
Member M Y Y<br />
WDT M Y BRS Over all<br />
Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-<strong>11</strong> 62
DWDU, Rajkot<br />
Table no. 32.4: Watershed Committee details (Dolatpar)<br />
Date <strong>of</strong> Name<br />
Registration<br />
Sl. Names <strong>of</strong><br />
as a Society<br />
No. WC<br />
(dd/mm/<br />
yyyy)<br />
Watershed<br />
committee,<br />
Dolatpar<br />
Jitubhai<br />
vibhabhai<br />
Segaliya<br />
Manojbhai<br />
Ratabhai<br />
Sondarva<br />
Nitaben<br />
Narshibhai<br />
Sondarva<br />
Mukeshbhai<br />
Jinabhai<br />
Jogani<br />
Jethabhai<br />
Chakabhai<br />
Sondarva<br />
Joshanaben<br />
Bhupatbhai<br />
Bhakhodiya<br />
Ratuben<br />
Baghabhai<br />
Dhrangiya<br />
Kishorbhai<br />
Hansarajbhai<br />
Bhuva<br />
UG SHG GP<br />
Designation M/F SC ST SF MF LF Landless<br />
Educational<br />
qualification<br />
Function/s<br />
assigned#<br />
President M Y Y 7 D<br />
Secretary M Y Y Y 10 C<br />
Member F Y Y Y 3 A<br />
Member M Y Y 10 B<br />
Member M Y Y Y 5 I<br />
Member F Y Y 7 I-G<br />
Member F Y Y - I<br />
Member M Y Y 8 F-B-E<br />
Vibhabhai<br />
Kanabhai Member M Y Y - B-H<br />
Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-<strong>11</strong> 63
DWDU, Rajkot<br />
Segaliya<br />
Vajiben<br />
Gopalbhai<br />
Kakadiya<br />
Jivatiben<br />
Vithalbhai<br />
Ramani<br />
Vithalbhai<br />
Chhaganbhai<br />
Bhakhodiya<br />
Sureshbhai<br />
K. Makavana<br />
Member F Y Y 3 E-G<br />
Member F Y Y - B<br />
Member M Y Y 7<br />
Member M Y BRS<br />
Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-<strong>11</strong> 64
DWDU, Rajkot<br />
Table no. 32.5: Watershed Committee details (Sanathali)<br />
Sl.<br />
No.<br />
Names <strong>of</strong><br />
WC<br />
Watershed<br />
committee,<br />
Sanathali<br />
Date <strong>of</strong><br />
Registration<br />
as a Society<br />
(dd/mm/<br />
yyyy)<br />
Name<br />
Hasamukhbhai<br />
Vallabhbhai<br />
Dhaduk<br />
Dipakbhai<br />
Vithalbhai<br />
Sorathiya<br />
Champaben<br />
Chhaganbhai<br />
Vora<br />
Pratapbhai<br />
Govindbhai<br />
Vekariya<br />
Baghabhai<br />
Rajabhai<br />
Makavana<br />
Divaliben<br />
Dehabhai<br />
Vaniya<br />
Mamaiyabhai<br />
Somabhai<br />
Janpada<br />
Ramaben<br />
Ashvinbhai<br />
Dabhi<br />
UG SHG GP<br />
Designation M/F SC ST SF MF LF Landless<br />
Educational<br />
qualification<br />
Function/s<br />
assigned#<br />
President M Y Y 12 D<br />
Secretary M BA C<br />
Member F Y Y 10 A<br />
Member M Y Y 1 <strong>11</strong> B<br />
Member M Y Y Y 2 I<br />
Member F Y Y Y - I-G<br />
Member M Y Y 3 I<br />
Member F Y Y 8 F-B-E<br />
Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-<strong>11</strong> 65
DWDU, Rajkot<br />
Ramanikbhai<br />
Nathabhai<br />
Gondaliya<br />
Bharatbhai<br />
Hirajibhai<br />
Kachchhi<br />
Vikrambhai<br />
Banubhai<br />
Saravaiya<br />
Vithalbhai<br />
Gagandasbhai<br />
Dhaduk<br />
Hareshbhai<br />
Kanjibhai<br />
Kachchhi<br />
Jagabhai<br />
Khimajibhai<br />
Siroya<br />
Hansaben<br />
Bhimajibhai<br />
Rupareliya<br />
Vasantben<br />
Ashokbhai<br />
Gajera<br />
Varshaben<br />
Hasubhai<br />
Vekariya<br />
Gitaben<br />
Sureshbhai<br />
Vekariya<br />
Ramanuj<br />
Manojbhai N.<br />
Member M Y Y 12 B-H<br />
Member M Y Y 10 E-G<br />
Member M Y Y 8 B<br />
Member M Y Y 7<br />
Member M Y Y 9<br />
Member M Y Y 7<br />
Member F Y Y 5<br />
Member F Y Y 7<br />
Member F Y Y 7<br />
Member F Y Y -<br />
Member M DCE<br />
Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-<strong>11</strong> 66
DWDU, Rajkot<br />
# Functions Assigned, as below<br />
A. PNP and PRA B. Planning<br />
C. Maintenance <strong>of</strong> Accounts D. Signing <strong>of</strong> cheques and making payments<br />
E. Supervision <strong>of</strong> construction activities F. Cost Estimation<br />
G. Verification & Measurement H. Record <strong>of</strong> labour employed<br />
I. Social Audit J. Any other (please specify).<br />
ii) Self Help Group<br />
We believe that the full potential <strong>of</strong> our watershed work can only be raised if it is supplemented by a micr<strong>of</strong>inance<br />
programme. This is essential if we are to ensure long-term livelihood security to the poor. We are also convinced<br />
that no micr<strong>of</strong>inance programme can be successful until it is tied up with livelihood programmes such as<br />
agriculture, dairying, marketing and enterprise development etc. Thus micr<strong>of</strong>inance and livelihood programmes<br />
are complementary to each other and their simultaneous implementation is the key to poverty alleviation.<br />
Incomes rose through livelihood initiatives need to be saved. Of these, women are the best custodians. Self Help<br />
Group is motivated, Small homogenous group organized together through highly successful <strong>of</strong> credit and thrift activities. These<br />
savings must be reinvested in livelihood options that in turn raise incomes, setting up various cycles. Generally self<br />
help group includes landless and marginal sized farm women, BPL household, SC/ST women.<br />
SHG initiative in watershed villages is being organized by having a focused group discussion between various homogenous<br />
communities <strong>of</strong> women based on their livelihood separately. With a view point <strong>of</strong> different problems related to rural credit, it<br />
was planned to organize these women into a group consisting <strong>of</strong> 10 to 13 in each groups and it was also proposed to have groups.<br />
Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-<strong>11</strong> 67
DWDU, Rajkot<br />
Table no. 33.1: SHG detail Kanpar<br />
S. No. With<br />
only<br />
Men<br />
Total no. <strong>of</strong> registered SHGs<br />
With only<br />
Women<br />
With<br />
both<br />
1 4 5 1 10<br />
No. <strong>of</strong> members<br />
No. <strong>of</strong> SC/ST in each<br />
category<br />
No. <strong>of</strong> BPL in each<br />
category<br />
Total Categories M F Total M F Total M F Total<br />
(i) Landless 20 20 40 10 10 20 10 10 20<br />
(ii) SF 25 35 60 15 25 40<br />
(iii) MF<br />
(iv) LF<br />
Total 4 5 1 10 45 55 100 10 10 20 25 35 60<br />
Table no. 33.2: SHG detail Junapippliya<br />
S. No. With<br />
only<br />
Men<br />
Total no. <strong>of</strong> registered SHGs<br />
With only<br />
Women<br />
With<br />
both<br />
1 2 4 1 7<br />
No. <strong>of</strong> members<br />
No. <strong>of</strong> SC/ST in each<br />
category<br />
No. <strong>of</strong> BPL in each<br />
category<br />
Total Categories M F Total M F Total M F Total<br />
(i) Landless 20 20 40 10 10 20 10 10 20<br />
(ii) SF 10 20 30<br />
(iii) MF<br />
(iv) LF<br />
Total 2 4 1 7 30 40 70 10 10 20 10 10 20<br />
Table no. 33.3: SHG detail Jivapar<br />
No. <strong>of</strong> SC/ST in each No. <strong>of</strong> BPL in each<br />
Total no. <strong>of</strong> registered SHGs<br />
No. <strong>of</strong> members<br />
S. No.<br />
category<br />
category<br />
With With only With Total Categories M F Total M F Total M F Total<br />
Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-<strong>11</strong> 68
DWDU, Rajkot<br />
only<br />
Men<br />
Women<br />
both<br />
1 3 5 1 9<br />
(i) Landless 10 50 60 10 10 20 10 30 40<br />
(ii) SF 10 10 20<br />
(iii) MF 10 10<br />
(iv) LF<br />
Total 3 5 1 9 20 70 90 10 10 20 10 30 40<br />
Table no. 33.4: SHG detail Dolatpar<br />
S. No. With<br />
only<br />
Men<br />
Total no. <strong>of</strong> registered SHGs<br />
With only<br />
Women<br />
With<br />
both<br />
1 1 1 1 3<br />
No. <strong>of</strong> members<br />
No. <strong>of</strong> SC/ST in each<br />
category<br />
No. <strong>of</strong> BPL in each<br />
category<br />
Total Categories M F Total M F Total M F Total<br />
(i) Landless 10 10 20 5 5 10 5 5 10<br />
(ii) SF 5 5 10<br />
(iii) MF<br />
(iv) LF<br />
Total 1 1 1 3 15 15 30 5 5 10 5 5 10<br />
Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-<strong>11</strong> 69
DWDU, Rajkot<br />
Table no. 33.5: SHG detail Sanathali<br />
S. No. With<br />
only<br />
Men<br />
Total no. <strong>of</strong> registered SHGs<br />
With only<br />
Women<br />
With<br />
both<br />
1 8 12 6 26<br />
No. <strong>of</strong> members<br />
No. <strong>of</strong> SC/ST in each<br />
category<br />
No. <strong>of</strong> BPL in each<br />
category<br />
Total Categories M F Total M F Total M F Total<br />
(i) Landless 60 90 150 20 30 50 40 60 100<br />
(ii) SF 40 40 80<br />
(iii) MF 10 20 30<br />
(iv) LF<br />
Total 8 12 6 26 <strong>11</strong>0 150 260 20 30 50 40 60 100<br />
Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-<strong>11</strong> 70
DWDU, Rajkot<br />
iii) User Group:<br />
These are homogeneous groups <strong>of</strong> persons having landholding within the watershed area. They are normally formed to manage<br />
an activity or asset on a long term basis. The user group collects user charges from their members. Some <strong>of</strong> the points which<br />
were considered while forming a user group were:<br />
1) In case <strong>of</strong> a check dam all the beneficiaries <strong>of</strong> the individual check dam were involved as user group members.<br />
2) In case <strong>of</strong> Fodder bank all the individual beneficiaries <strong>of</strong> animal husbandry are considered as potential members.<br />
3) Khadi based cottage industry, Papad making user groups for micro enterprise activities<br />
4) Membership was on voluntary and democratic.<br />
Focused group discussion was conducted to between the user groups to discuss the above conditions and to select potential<br />
members. It was advocated that each group to formulate certain internal rules and have a feeling <strong>of</strong> ownership with community<br />
spirit.<br />
Table No. 34: The following types <strong>of</strong> groups were planned to be formed<br />
S. No Name <strong>of</strong> User Group (land based) Major Task<br />
1 Fuel and fodder Group <strong>Development</strong> <strong>of</strong> Pasture land<br />
2 Farm pond/Percolation tank user Group Equitable sharing <strong>of</strong> resources<br />
3 Farm bund and Check Dam Group Equitable sharing <strong>of</strong> resources<br />
4 Fodder bank Group<br />
5 Nursery Group<br />
Ensure fodder security in village<br />
<strong>Development</strong> <strong>of</strong> community land for fodder development<br />
Timely supply <strong>of</strong> enriched fodder at a affordable price.<br />
Maintenance <strong>of</strong> nursery plot<br />
Ensure Timely supply <strong>of</strong> seedling for afforestation.<br />
S. No Name <strong>of</strong> other Groups (except land based) Major Task<br />
1 Micro-enterprise developing group Ensuring livelihood opportunities, reducing distress migration<br />
2 Animal Husbandry Group Bringing <strong>of</strong> new AH technology, Management <strong>of</strong> New Cattle and their<br />
Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-<strong>11</strong> 71
DWDU, Rajkot<br />
Table no. 34. 1: UG detail Kanpar<br />
S. No,<br />
Total no. <strong>of</strong> UGs No. <strong>of</strong> members No. <strong>of</strong> SC/ST in each<br />
category<br />
No. <strong>of</strong> BPL in each<br />
category<br />
Men Women Both Total Categories M F Total M F Total M F Total<br />
(i) Landless 20 30 50 10 10 20 5 5 10<br />
1<br />
32 10 10 52<br />
(ii) SF 210 70 280 10 10 40 20 60<br />
(iii) MF <strong>11</strong>0 30 140<br />
(iv) LF 30 20<br />
50<br />
Total 32 10 10 52 370 150 520 20 10 30 45 25 70<br />
Table no. 34. 2: UG detail Junapipilya<br />
S. No,<br />
Total no. <strong>of</strong> UGs No. <strong>of</strong> members No. <strong>of</strong> SC/ST in each<br />
category<br />
No. <strong>of</strong> BPL in each<br />
category<br />
Men Women Both Total Categories M F Total M F Total M F Total<br />
(i) Landless 20 20 40 5 5 10 5 5 10<br />
1<br />
42 10 4 56<br />
(ii) SF 240 60 300 25 5 30 30 - 30<br />
(iii) MF 130 30 160<br />
(iv) LF 50 10<br />
60<br />
Total 42 10 4 56 440 120 560 30 10 40 35 5 40<br />
Table no. 34. 3: UG detail Jivapar<br />
S. No, Total no. <strong>of</strong> UGs No. <strong>of</strong> members No. <strong>of</strong> SC/ST in each<br />
category<br />
No. <strong>of</strong> BPL in each<br />
category<br />
Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-<strong>11</strong> 72
DWDU, Rajkot<br />
Men Women Both Total Categories M F Total M F Total M F Total<br />
(i) Landless 20 - 20 10 - 10 10 - 10<br />
1<br />
35 <strong>11</strong> 4 50<br />
(ii) SF 210 60 270 20 10 30 60 20 80<br />
(iii) MF 120 50 170<br />
(iv) LF 50 20<br />
70<br />
Total 35 <strong>11</strong> 4 50 370 130 500 30 10 40 70 20 90<br />
Table no. 34. 4: UG detail Dolatpar<br />
S. No,<br />
Total no. <strong>of</strong> UGs No. <strong>of</strong> members No. <strong>of</strong> SC/ST in each No. <strong>of</strong> BPL in each<br />
category<br />
category<br />
Men Women Both Total Categories M F Total M F Total M F Total<br />
(i) Landless 10 10 20 5 5 10 10 - 10<br />
1<br />
10 6 4 20<br />
(ii) SF 80 40 120 10 - 10 30 10 40<br />
(iii) MF 20 20 40<br />
(iv) LF 10 10<br />
20<br />
Total 10 6 4 20 120 80 200 15 5 20 40 10 50<br />
Table no. 34. 5: UG detail Sanathali<br />
S. No,<br />
Total no. <strong>of</strong> UGs No. <strong>of</strong> members No. <strong>of</strong> SC/ST in each No. <strong>of</strong> BPL in each<br />
category<br />
category<br />
Men Women Both Total Categories M F Total M F Total M F Total<br />
Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-<strong>11</strong> 73
DWDU, Rajkot<br />
1<br />
90 43 30 163<br />
(i) Landless 50 20 70 10 5 15 20 5 25<br />
(ii) SF 680 340 1020 5 5 10 80 30 <strong>11</strong>0<br />
(iii) MF 300 180 480 - - - - - -<br />
(iv) LF 20 40<br />
60<br />
- - - - -- --<br />
Total 90 43 30 163 1050 580 1630 15 10 25 100 35 135<br />
Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-<strong>11</strong> 74
DWDU, Rajkot<br />
4.3. Physical activities to be undertaken under <strong>IWMP</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />
4.3.1: Activities to be undertaken under EPA<br />
EPA activities are certain important works which are in urgent demand <strong>of</strong> the local community. This helps in establishment <strong>of</strong><br />
credibility <strong>of</strong> watershed <strong>Development</strong> Team (WDT). It also acts as a rapport building activity <strong>of</strong> the village community. A group<br />
Discussion was conducted with watershed <strong>Development</strong> Committee regarding the EPA activity, it was conveyed to the amount <strong>of</strong><br />
Rs. 6.52 lakh in Kanpar, 4.55 lakh in Juna pipaliya, 6.13 lakh in Jivapar, 1.82 lakh in Dolatpar and 16.89 lakh for Sanathali was<br />
allotted for EPA activity, which is 4 per cent <strong>of</strong> total allocated budget. The villagers discussed various activities which they felt is<br />
important but after a brief discussion it was conveyed to them that only those activities can taken, which revive the common<br />
natural resources and common benefits .<br />
Table No. 35: Entry Point Activities (EPA): Some <strong>of</strong> the major activities proposed in Kanpar are:<br />
Name <strong>of</strong><br />
Villages<br />
Kanpar<br />
Details <strong>of</strong> activity Amount earmarked for EPA Estimated Cost ( In<br />
lakhs)<br />
Pipeline near plot area 6.52 Lakhs<br />
0.735<br />
Snanghat 1.255<br />
Pond deepening 0.995<br />
Causeway 2.929<br />
Animal camp 0.300<br />
Drinking water Well reparing 0.306<br />
Total<br />
6.52<br />
Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-<strong>11</strong> 75
DWDU, Rajkot<br />
Table No. 35.1: Some <strong>of</strong> the major activities proposed in Juna Pipaliya are:<br />
Name <strong>of</strong><br />
Villages<br />
Juna<br />
Pipaliya<br />
Details <strong>of</strong> activity Amount earmarked for EPA Estimated Cost ( In<br />
lakhs)<br />
Causeway 4.551<br />
2.953<br />
Washing ghat near Bharwad mohalla 0.994<br />
Animal camp 0.300<br />
Otta 0.280<br />
Total<br />
4.527<br />
Table No. 35.2: Some <strong>of</strong> the major activities proposed in Jivapar are:<br />
Name <strong>of</strong><br />
Villages<br />
Jivapar<br />
Details <strong>of</strong> activity Amount earmarked for EPA Estimated Cost ( In<br />
lakhs)<br />
Water tank in village 6.13 Lakhs<br />
1.400<br />
Water tank in school 0.980<br />
Causeway cum checkdam repairing 2.984<br />
Animal camp 0.260<br />
Otta 0.506<br />
Total<br />
6.13<br />
Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-<strong>11</strong> 76
DWDU, Rajkot<br />
Table No. 35.3: Some <strong>of</strong> the major activities proposed in Dolatpar are:<br />
Name <strong>of</strong><br />
Villages<br />
Dolatpar<br />
Details <strong>of</strong> activity Amount earmarked for EPA Estimated Cost ( In<br />
lakhs)<br />
Animal camp<br />
1.82<br />
0.138<br />
Causeway cum check dam near Water tank 1.682<br />
Total<br />
1.82<br />
Table No. 35.4: Some <strong>of</strong> the major activities proposed in Sanathali are:<br />
Name <strong>of</strong><br />
Villages<br />
Sanathali<br />
Details <strong>of</strong> activity Amount earmarked for EPA Estimated Cost ( In<br />
lakhs)<br />
Ro<strong>of</strong>ing in Havada near well 16.89<br />
1.108<br />
Causeway near Aanganwadi 0.829<br />
Washing ghat near old well 0.504<br />
Open Gutter 0.828<br />
Causeway near Bekariya temple 2.953<br />
Causeway near substation 1.703<br />
Ro<strong>of</strong>ing in havada near plot area 1.055<br />
Drinking water facility in high school 0.98<br />
Animal camp 0.51<br />
Bus stop repairing near SC Mohalla 0.249<br />
Old pond deepening 0.905<br />
Underground Gutter in Gamtal 2.955<br />
Checkdam repairing 1.581<br />
Pump house 0.730<br />
Total<br />
16.89<br />
Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-<strong>11</strong> 77
DWDU, Rajkot<br />
4.3.2. Watershed <strong>Development</strong> Works:<br />
Watershed development works is to be done during implementation phase <strong>of</strong> watershed. Treatments begin from the highest point <strong>of</strong> the<br />
watershed and move progressively downwards (ridge to valley), starting with the smallest stream and culminating in the main river <strong>of</strong><br />
the watershed. Work is location-specific, varying according to slope and geology as also the size <strong>of</strong> the stream being treated. The aim is to<br />
weave interventions into the contours <strong>of</strong> nature, not to seek mastery over it. A net budget <strong>of</strong> 50 percent is allotted for this work.<br />
4.3.2.1 Ridge Area Treatment Plans<br />
In a watershed, the slopes falling from the ridge to the beginning <strong>of</strong> the plains are called ridge area. It is very important to treat the<br />
higher reaches <strong>of</strong> the ridge has this is where the major water resources originate. This involves mainly highly and forest region in the<br />
watershed. Various watershed managing structures should be build to arrest the erosion and degradation <strong>of</strong> forest with grasses in<br />
upper ridges.<br />
a. Contour Bund/trench<br />
b. Boulder Checks<br />
c. Gabions 4. Grass seedling/planatation<br />
a. Contour Bunds/Trench<br />
Contour bund/trenches are a simple, low-cost method <strong>of</strong> checking the velocity <strong>of</strong> run<strong>of</strong>f in the ridge area <strong>of</strong> any watershed. A<br />
contour trench is a trench dug along a contour line. A contour line is an imaginary line that joins together points <strong>of</strong> the same<br />
elevation. Digging a trench along a line that is at the same level increases the chances <strong>of</strong> containing run<strong>of</strong>f for a longer period <strong>of</strong><br />
time within the trench. If bunds/trenches were not to follow a contour, such digging could actually increase the possibility <strong>of</strong> soil<br />
erosion because there would be a rise in the velocity <strong>of</strong> run<strong>of</strong>f following upon an increase in the slope <strong>of</strong> the land. In the ridge area<br />
Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-<strong>11</strong> 78
DWDU, Rajkot<br />
<strong>of</strong> a watershed a contour bund/trench is a simple and inexpensive solution to slowing down surface run<strong>of</strong>f and reducing soil<br />
erosion.<br />
Objectives<br />
1) Slowing down the velocity <strong>of</strong> run<strong>of</strong>f<br />
2) Checking soil erosion<br />
3) Improving local soil moisture pr<strong>of</strong>ile<br />
Contour bunds/trenches are constructed in the ridge area <strong>of</strong> a watershed. Rainwater, which falls in this area flow unchecked<br />
carrying with it eroded soil into the flatter portion <strong>of</strong> the watershed - the "valley". This silt gets deposited into reservoirs and<br />
ponds, reducing their life. Thus, any water harvesting work undertaken in the valley will become meaningless unless appropriate<br />
measures such as contour trenching are undertaken to control run<strong>of</strong>f and soil erosion in the ridge. Contour trenches collect the<br />
rainwater that falls in the ridge area. This way the soil moisture pr<strong>of</strong>ile in the area adjacent to the trench is improved.<br />
b. Boulder Checks /Loose Boulder checks<br />
Boulder checks or gully plugs are loose rock dams made on small drainage lines or seasonal streams which have a catchment area<br />
<strong>of</strong> less than 50 ha. It is adopted where the water velocity is high and where basically stone available with in radius <strong>of</strong> 100-150 m from<br />
the site. The main aim <strong>of</strong> constructing loose boulder checks is to reduce the velocity <strong>of</strong> water flowing through the drainage line. By reducing<br />
the velocity <strong>of</strong> run<strong>of</strong>f, boulder checks help in:<br />
1. Reducing soil erosion;<br />
2. Trapping silt which slows the rate <strong>of</strong> siltation in water harvesting structures in the lower reaches <strong>of</strong> the watershed.<br />
3. Creating a hydraulic head locally which enhances infiltration <strong>of</strong> surface run<strong>of</strong>f into the groundwater system; and<br />
4. Increasing the duration <strong>of</strong> flow in the drainage line. Therefore, the capacity <strong>of</strong> the water harvesting structures created downstream on the<br />
drainage line is utilized more fully as they get many more refills.<br />
Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-<strong>11</strong> 79
DWDU, Rajkot<br />
c. Gabions<br />
Gabion structures are rock and wire dams constructed across drainage lines with a catchment area <strong>of</strong> 50-500 ha. They are also<br />
constructed to reinforce highly erodible stream embankments. The main aim <strong>of</strong> constructing gabion structures is to reduce the velocity<br />
<strong>of</strong> water flowing through the drainage line. By reducing the velocity <strong>of</strong> run<strong>of</strong>f, gabion structures help in<br />
1. Reduction in soil erosion<br />
2. Trapping silt, which reduces the rate <strong>of</strong> siltation in water harvesting structures in the lower reaches <strong>of</strong> the watershed.<br />
3. Increasing recharge <strong>of</strong> groundwater<br />
4. Increasing the duration <strong>of</strong> flow in the drainage line. Therefore, the capacity <strong>of</strong> the water harvesting structures created<br />
downstream on the drainage line is utilized more fully as they get many more refills.<br />
Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-<strong>11</strong> 80
DWDU, Rajkot<br />
4.3.2.2 Drainage line Treatment and water harvesting for land development:<br />
The second tier treatment is the slope treatment. This is generally agricultural land or waste lands. These are generally water<br />
conservation or surface water storage structures. Following structures has been proposed in the project villages.<br />
a. Check dams/Causeway cum check dams<br />
b. Waste Weir<br />
a. Check dams<br />
Check dams are constructed across small streams having gentle slope, the selected should have sufficient thickness <strong>of</strong> permeable<br />
bed or weathered formation to facilitate recharge <strong>of</strong> stored water within short span <strong>of</strong> time. The surface water stored in these<br />
structures is mostly confined to stream course and the height is normally less than 2m and excess water is allowed to flow over<br />
the wall in order to avoid scouring from excess run<strong>of</strong>f water cushions are provided at downstream side. To harness the maximum<br />
run <strong>of</strong>f in the stream series <strong>of</strong> such check dams are to be constructed to have recharge on regional scale in project villages.<br />
b. Waste weirs<br />
These are constructed for giving a safe passage to the excess run<strong>of</strong>f from the field and also store some amount <strong>of</strong> water in the<br />
field. The water stored in these structures is mostly confined in field and height is normally less than 1 mt. and excess water is<br />
allowed to flow over the wall.<br />
Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-<strong>11</strong> 81
DWDU, Rajkot<br />
4.3.2.3 Plains or Flat level/Field level:<br />
1. Farm pond<br />
2. Irrigation/Percolation tank<br />
3. Farm bund<br />
4. Afforestation<br />
1) Farm Pond:<br />
There is very little qualitative difference between a pond/ tank, which usually serves the population <strong>of</strong> a village, and farm pond,<br />
which serves an individual agricultural field. Farms ponds greatly vary in size depending upon the rainfall. These have only a few<br />
meters <strong>of</strong> length and width and are built across the flow path <strong>of</strong> natural drainage channels. Surplus water from one pond spills over<br />
to a lower pond. In some cases a series <strong>of</strong> farm ponds are built on one single stream. Each pond caters to the irrigation needs <strong>of</strong> one<br />
farm and also augments ground water recharge.<br />
2) Irrigation/Percolation tank<br />
a) Irrigation Dam: Such dams can be constructed to meet two different kinds <strong>of</strong> demands.<br />
<strong>of</strong> storing water during the rainy season to be used for irrigation in the post-monsoon period.<br />
<strong>of</strong> providing protective irrigation during dry spells within the rainy season. Most parts <strong>of</strong> India typically receive<br />
rainfall between June and September, very intensely within a few hours and a few days. The number <strong>of</strong> rainy days<br />
does not average more than 40-50. Moreover, rains are extremely erratic, <strong>of</strong>ten characterised by late onset and early<br />
withdrawal. Prolonged dry spells during the rainy season, resulting in agricultural droughts, are also frequent.<br />
Hence, the kharif crop needs to be drought-pro<strong>of</strong>ed through 'protective' irrigation, applied to overcome<br />
Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-<strong>11</strong> 82
DWDU, Rajkot<br />
accumulated soil moisture deficits within the rainy season. Such structures are especially important in areas which<br />
are poor in groundwater resources and which do not have access to canal irrigation. Such areas form about half <strong>of</strong><br />
India's agricultural area.<br />
b). Percolation Tank: Percolation dams are constructed for recharging groundwater. Such structures are usually made on the<br />
upper part <strong>of</strong> the catchment area. Water stored here percolates to wells and tube wells located in the lower part <strong>of</strong> the catchment.<br />
Such dams can also be made in the immediate upstream portion <strong>of</strong> wells and tube wells. Depending on the capacity <strong>of</strong> the dam and<br />
duration <strong>of</strong> water storage, the dam can have secondary benefits (such as pisciculture) that are vital for the livelihood security <strong>of</strong><br />
marginal farmers and landless labourers.<br />
3) Farm bund<br />
Farm bunds are constructed on agricultural land with the aim <strong>of</strong> arresting soil erosion and improving the soil moisture pr<strong>of</strong>ile.<br />
Ideally, bunds on farms should be made on the contour line. But this creates several problems for farmers. Contour bunds<br />
divide the field into irregular sections. In such a situation, it becomes inconvenient to maneuver bullocks for operations such<br />
as ploughing and line-sowing.<br />
4. Afforestation: Emphasis is placed on maximizing the use <strong>of</strong> available land and resources with high yield tree species. Trees can<br />
either be <strong>of</strong> similar species or mixed in a manner that will result in a stand or forest. Depending on the climate, geographical layout<br />
<strong>of</strong> the area and the soil conditions, trees that have the greatest growth potential are selected like Babool, Neem, Sesame and<br />
Ailanthus.<br />
Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-<strong>11</strong> 83
DWDU, Rajkot<br />
Table no.36: Details <strong>of</strong> ridge line treatment / land based activities in watershed works: Kanpar<br />
S.<br />
No.<br />
Type <strong>of</strong> treatment<br />
Type <strong>of</strong> land<br />
Executing<br />
agency<br />
Target<br />
(ii)<br />
(iii)<br />
Name <strong>of</strong> structures (iii) (i)<br />
(i) UG<br />
(i) Ridge Drainage<br />
(ii) Others<br />
Land dev Private<br />
(iii) WC<br />
(ii)SHG<br />
area (R) line<br />
Community (pl.<br />
(L)<br />
(D)<br />
specify)<br />
Boulder checks UG/WC 20 1.60<br />
Gabion structure UG/WC 2 1.50<br />
Waste weir L P UG/WC 77 8.47<br />
Farm bunding L P UG/WC 20000 8.00<br />
Nala Plug 10 1.50<br />
Afforestation L P C WC 2 2.5<br />
Gramvatika L C WC 1 1.60<br />
Estimated cost<br />
Expected<br />
No. <strong>of</strong> units<br />
(No./ (Rs. in lakh)<br />
month & year<br />
<strong>of</strong> completion<br />
cu.m./ rmt) M W O T (mm/yyyy)<br />
Total: 25.17<br />
Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-<strong>11</strong> 84
DWDU, Rajkot<br />
Table no. 36.i: Details <strong>of</strong> ridge line treatment / land based activities in watershed works: Junapipaliya<br />
Executing<br />
Type <strong>of</strong> treatment<br />
Type <strong>of</strong> land<br />
agency<br />
S.<br />
No.<br />
Target<br />
(ii)<br />
(iii)<br />
Name <strong>of</strong> structures (iii) (i)<br />
(i) UG<br />
(i) Ridge Drainage<br />
(ii) Others<br />
Land dev Private<br />
(iii) WC<br />
(ii)SHG<br />
area (R) line<br />
Community (pl.<br />
(L)<br />
(D)<br />
specify)<br />
Boulder checks R C WC 25 2.00<br />
Gabion structure R C WC 1 1.25<br />
Waste weir L P UG/WC 50 6.50<br />
Farm bunding L P UG/WC 6000 2.5<br />
Farm bunding Con<br />
Estimated cost<br />
Expected<br />
No. <strong>of</strong> units<br />
(No./ (Rs. in lakh)<br />
month & year<br />
<strong>of</strong> completion<br />
cu.m./ rmt) M W O T (mm/yyyy)<br />
(MGNREGA)<br />
Line Dept 1000 0.5<br />
Gramvatika L C WC 1 1.5<br />
Afforestation L P WC/UG 2 2.5<br />
Total: 16.75<br />
Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-<strong>11</strong> 85
DWDU, Rajkot<br />
Table no. 36.ii: Details <strong>of</strong> ridge line treatment / land based activities in watershed works: Jivapar<br />
Executing<br />
Type <strong>of</strong> treatment<br />
Type <strong>of</strong> land<br />
agency<br />
S.<br />
No.<br />
Target<br />
(ii)<br />
(iii)<br />
Name <strong>of</strong> structures (iii) (i)<br />
(i) UG<br />
(i) Ridge Drainage<br />
(ii) Others<br />
Land dev Private<br />
(iii) WC<br />
(ii)SHG<br />
area (R) line<br />
Community (pl.<br />
(L)<br />
(D)<br />
specify)<br />
Boulder checks 35 2.8<br />
Gabion structure 2 1.4<br />
Waste weir L P UG/WC 40 5.2<br />
Farm bunding L P UG/WC 15000 6.0<br />
Estimated cost<br />
Expected<br />
No. <strong>of</strong> units<br />
(No./ (Rs. in lakh)<br />
month & year<br />
<strong>of</strong> completion<br />
cu.m./ rmt) M W O T (mm/yyyy)<br />
Flood protection<br />
wall<br />
P UG 85 1.36<br />
Drainage channel L P UG 4500 3.5<br />
Afforestation L P UG 1.2 2.0<br />
Total: 22.26<br />
Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-<strong>11</strong> 86
DWDU, Rajkot<br />
Table no. 36.iii: Details <strong>of</strong> engineering structures in watershed works: Dolatpar<br />
S.<br />
No.<br />
Type <strong>of</strong> treatment<br />
Type <strong>of</strong> land<br />
Executing<br />
agency<br />
Target<br />
(ii)<br />
(iii)<br />
Name <strong>of</strong> structures (iii) (i)<br />
(i) UG<br />
(i) Ridge Drainage<br />
(ii) Others<br />
Land dev Private<br />
(iii) WC<br />
(ii)SHG<br />
area (R) line<br />
Community (pl.<br />
(L)<br />
(D)<br />
specify)<br />
Boulder checks L P C 5 0.40<br />
Waste weir L P UG/WC <strong>11</strong> 1.65<br />
Farm bunding L P UG/WC 2500 1.0<br />
Farm bunding Con<br />
(NREGA)<br />
Estimated cost<br />
Expected<br />
No. <strong>of</strong> units<br />
(No./ (Rs. in lakh)<br />
month & year<br />
<strong>of</strong> completion<br />
cu.m./ rmt) M W O T (mm/yyyy)<br />
2000 1.0<br />
Total:4.05<br />
Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-<strong>11</strong> 87
DWDU, Rajkot<br />
Table no. 36.iv: Details <strong>of</strong> engineering structures in watershed works: Sanathali<br />
S.<br />
No.<br />
Name <strong>of</strong> structures<br />
Type <strong>of</strong> treatment<br />
(ii)<br />
(i) RidgeDrainage<br />
area (R) line<br />
(D)<br />
(iii)<br />
Land dev<br />
(L)<br />
(i)<br />
Private<br />
Type <strong>of</strong> land<br />
(iii)<br />
(ii) Others<br />
Community (pl.<br />
specify)<br />
Executing<br />
agency<br />
(i) UG<br />
(ii)SHG<br />
(iii) WC<br />
Target<br />
Estimated cost<br />
Expected<br />
No. <strong>of</strong> units<br />
(No./ (Rs. in lakh)<br />
month & year<br />
<strong>of</strong> completion<br />
cu.m./ rmt) MWO T (mm/yyyy)<br />
Continuous Contour<br />
Bund/Trench<br />
R C WC 3000 3.00<br />
Boulder Checks P C UG/WC 80 6.5<br />
Flood Protetion wall L C WC 500 12.0<br />
Gabion structure D C WC 5 3.5<br />
Waste weir L P UG/WC 300 4.2<br />
Farm bunding L P UG/WC 85000 36.00<br />
Drainage Channel L P UG 15000 8.0<br />
Gramvatika C WC 1 2.0<br />
Afforestation/Plantation L P C WC/UG 25ha 27.91<br />
Total: 103.<strong>11</strong><br />
Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-<strong>11</strong> 88
DWDU, Rajkot<br />
Table No 36.a: Technical Details <strong>of</strong> Earthen Contour Bund/Trench<br />
Earthen Contour Bund/Trench<br />
Particulars Unit Value<br />
Top width 0.3<br />
U/S Slope 1: 1.5<br />
D/S Slope 1: 1.5<br />
Max. height 0.75<br />
Length <strong>of</strong> contour Bund/Trench per ha. per row 100<br />
Spacing <strong>of</strong> two Contour Bunds 10<br />
No. <strong>of</strong> Rows per Ha. 1000.0<br />
Area <strong>of</strong> cross section <strong>of</strong> Contour Bund 1.06875<br />
Qty. <strong>of</strong> earthwork in contour bund 1068.75<br />
Rate For E/W in S<strong>of</strong>t soil 41.00<br />
Total cost <strong>of</strong> contour bund per meter. 44<br />
Table No 36.b: Technical Details <strong>of</strong> Boulder checks<br />
Chainage Height Area <strong>of</strong> X-Section<br />
Average .area <strong>of</strong> x-<br />
Section Length Quantity<br />
0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00<br />
2 0.65 1.49 0.74 2 1.49<br />
4 0.84 2.36 1.92 2 3.85<br />
5 1.00 3.25 2.81 1 2.81<br />
6.5 0.83 2.31 2.78 1.5 4.17<br />
7 0.00 0.00 1.15 0.5 0.58<br />
Total 7 12.89<br />
Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-<strong>11</strong> 89
DWDU, Rajkot<br />
Cost Estimate For Boulder Check<br />
Particulars Unit Value Rate<br />
Total Length Mt 7<br />
Max. height Mt 1<br />
U/S Slope 1: 2.5<br />
D/S Slope 1: 3<br />
Top Width Mt 0.5<br />
Quantity <strong>of</strong> Boulder Check Cum 12.89<br />
Add15% for Keying & Exit weir Cum 1.93<br />
Total quantity <strong>of</strong> Boulder Cum 14.82 600<br />
Unit Cost <strong>of</strong> Boulder Check Rs 8892<br />
Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-<strong>11</strong> 90
DWDU, Rajkot<br />
L -Section <strong>of</strong> Boulder Check-2<br />
Height<br />
0.4<br />
0.2<br />
0<br />
-0.2<br />
-0.4<br />
-0.6<br />
-0.8<br />
-1<br />
-1.2<br />
0<br />
0<br />
0 2 4 6 8<br />
Series1<br />
-0.65<br />
Series2<br />
-0.84<br />
-0.83<br />
-1<br />
Distance<br />
Distances<br />
4<br />
3<br />
2<br />
1<br />
0<br />
-1<br />
-2<br />
-3<br />
-4<br />
1.875<br />
Plan <strong>of</strong> Boulder check-2<br />
0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25<br />
-0.25<br />
-0.25 -0.25 -0.25 -0.25 -0.25<br />
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8<br />
-2.2<br />
-2.77<br />
-2.74<br />
-3.25<br />
2.35<br />
Chainage<br />
2.75<br />
2.325<br />
Cross Section <strong>of</strong> Boulder Check<br />
Height<br />
1.2<br />
1<br />
0.8<br />
0.6<br />
0.4<br />
0.2<br />
0<br />
U/S<br />
1:1<br />
D/S 1:3<br />
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8<br />
Distance<br />
Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-<strong>11</strong> 91
DWDU, Rajkot<br />
Table No 36.c: Technical Details <strong>of</strong> Gabion structures<br />
Dimension for Construction & Costing <strong>of</strong> Gabion Structure<br />
S. no Particulars Measurement Unit<br />
1 Length <strong>of</strong> Head Wall 6.0 Meter<br />
2 Height <strong>of</strong> Head Wall 1.0 Meter<br />
3 Top Width <strong>of</strong> Head Wall 1.0 Meter<br />
4 Bottom Width <strong>of</strong> Head Wall 2.0 Meter<br />
5 Width <strong>of</strong> Apron 2.0 Meter<br />
6 Thickness <strong>of</strong> Apron 0.6 Meter<br />
7 Length <strong>of</strong> Side Wall 4.0 Meter<br />
8 Height <strong>of</strong> Side Wall 2.0 Meter<br />
9 Thickness <strong>of</strong> Side Wall 1.0 Meter<br />
10 Length <strong>of</strong> Key Wall 6.0 Meter<br />
<strong>11</strong> Total Length <strong>of</strong> Structure 20.0 Meter<br />
12 Steps (V:H) 0.5 :1<br />
Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-<strong>11</strong> 92
DWDU, Rajkot<br />
Quantity & Cost Estimation <strong>of</strong> Gabion Structure<br />
S.no Particular No. Length Width H/D/T Quantity Unit Rate Amount<br />
1 Excavation<br />
1.1 Below head wall and for Apron in H.S. 1 8.0 4.0 0.6 19.2<br />
1.2 For Key in H.S. 2 6.0 1.0 1.25 15.0<br />
Total Excavation 34.2 Cum. 41.00 1402.2<br />
2 Construction<br />
2.1 Head Wall 1 6.0 1.5 1.0 9<br />
2.2 Below head wall and for Apron in H.S. 1 8 4.0 0.6 19.2<br />
2.3 Key Wall 2 6.0 1.0 1.25 15.0<br />
2.4 Side Wall 2 4.0 1 1.5 12<br />
55.2 Cum. 1225.00 67620<br />
Total Cost 69022<br />
Grand Total 69069.35<br />
Cost Estimation say 69100.00<br />
Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-<strong>11</strong> 93
DWDU, Rajkot<br />
Table No-36 .d: Technical Details <strong>of</strong> Afforestation Activities<br />
Particulars Value Unit<br />
Crop Name<br />
Ailanthus<br />
Plant To Plant Spacing 8.00 Mt<br />
Row to Row Spacing 8.00 Mt<br />
Pit Length 1.00 Mt<br />
Pit Width 1.00 Mt<br />
Pit Depth 1.00 Mt<br />
No. <strong>of</strong> Plants 156 Nos.<br />
Plantation Area 10.00 Ha.<br />
No. <strong>of</strong> Plants for ha 1,560 Nos.<br />
Gap Filling 20 %<br />
Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-<strong>11</strong> 94
DWDU, Rajkot<br />
Cost Estimation for afforestation activity<br />
S. No. Description No. Lengt<br />
h(m.) Width Depth Unit Quantity Rate Amount<br />
(m.) (m.)<br />
1 Digging <strong>of</strong> pits for plants in Ordinary murum 1,560 1 1 1 Cum 1,560.00 10 15600<br />
2 Plants saplings for plantation in Govt. pasture area,<br />
sapling not less than 30 cm. height<br />
1,560 Nos. 1,560.00 10 15600<br />
3 Transportation <strong>of</strong> plants from nursery to camp site upto 1,560 Nos. 1,560.00 1 1560<br />
4 Loading and unloading <strong>of</strong> plants 1,560 Nos. 1,560.00 1 1560<br />
5 Rehandling <strong>of</strong> plants from camp site to actual planting 1,560 Nos. 1,560.00 1 1560<br />
site upto 20Omt.<br />
6 Cost <strong>of</strong> fertiliser & insecticides incl. application 1,560 Nos. 1,560.00 10 15600<br />
7 Weeding and Hoeing two times (Twice in year] 1,560 Nos. 1,560.00 2 3120<br />
Total 54600<br />
Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-<strong>11</strong> 95
DWDU, Rajkot<br />
Table No 36.e: Technical Details/Estimates <strong>of</strong> Farm Bund<br />
Estimate <strong>of</strong> cost : Farm Bunding<br />
Particulars Value Unit<br />
Top width 0.6 Mt<br />
U/S Slope 1: 1<br />
D/S Slope 1: 1<br />
Max. height 0.75 Mt<br />
Bottom Width 2.1 Mt.<br />
Area <strong>of</strong> cross section <strong>of</strong> Farm Bund 1.0125 Sq mt<br />
Qty. <strong>of</strong> earthwork <strong>of</strong> Farm bund /Meter 1.0125 Cumec<br />
Rate /cumec 41.00 Rs.<br />
Total cost <strong>of</strong> Farmbunding per mt. 41.41 RS<br />
Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-<strong>11</strong> 96
DWDU, Rajkot<br />
Table No 36.f: Technical Details <strong>of</strong> Farm Pond<br />
Particulars Value Unit<br />
Pond Length 15.00 Mt.<br />
Pond Width 10.00 Mt.<br />
Pond Depth 1.80 Mt.<br />
Side Slope 2 : 1<br />
Pond Top Area 204 Sq. mt<br />
Pond bottom area 104 Sq mt.<br />
Quantity 270 Cum<br />
Cost/cum in s<strong>of</strong>t soil 41 Rs<br />
Total cost <strong>11</strong>070 Rs<br />
Table no 36.g. Technical details <strong>of</strong> Irrigation/Percolation Tank<br />
Particulars<br />
Value<br />
Structure Length 50 Mt.<br />
Structure Breadth 50 Mt.<br />
Structure Height 2.00 Mt.<br />
Top Cross sectional area 2500 Sq Mt.<br />
Tank bottom cross sectional area 2500 Sq Mt.<br />
Excavation in s<strong>of</strong>t soil 5000 Cumec<br />
Rate <strong>of</strong> Excavation 41 Rs.<br />
Total cost <strong>of</strong> tank according to dimension 205000 Rs<br />
Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-<strong>11</strong> 97
DWDU, Rajkot<br />
Table no 36.h: Technical details & Cost Estimation <strong>of</strong> Waste weir<br />
Quantity & Cost Estimation <strong>of</strong> waste weir<br />
S.no Particular No. Length Width H/D/T Quantity Unit Rate Amount<br />
1 Excavation<br />
1.1 Body Wall 1 4.00 0.45 0.45 0.81<br />
1.2 Appron 1 4.00 1.00 0.45 1.80<br />
1.3 Abutment 2 2.00 0.45 0.45 0.81<br />
Total Excavation 3.42 Cum. 41.00 140.22<br />
2 U C R Masonary<br />
2.1 Bodywall 1 4.00 0.45 0.45 0.81<br />
2.2 Appon 1 4.00 1.00 0.45 1.80<br />
2.3 Abutment 2 2.00 0.45 0.45 0.81<br />
2.4 Body Wall 1 4.00 0.45 0.45 0.81<br />
2.5 Abutment 2 2.00 0.45 0.75 1.35<br />
Total U C R masonary 5.58 Cum. 1330.00 7441.40<br />
3 1:2:4<br />
3.1 L.S. 1.00 4.00 0.45 0.10 0.18<br />
3.2 R.S. 2.00 2.00 0.45 0.10 0.18<br />
0.36 Cum. 2420.00 871.20<br />
4 Plaster<br />
4.1 1.00 4.00 0.40 1.60<br />
4.2 1.00 4.00 0.40 1.60<br />
4.3 1 4.00 0.45 1.80<br />
4.4 1.00 4.00 0.45 1.80<br />
4.5 4.00 1.00 0.60 2.40<br />
4.6 2 0.45 0.60 0.54<br />
9.73 Sq.mt. 74.00 720.02<br />
Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-<strong>11</strong> 98
DWDU, Rajkot<br />
Pipe 4 .45 1.8 Rmt<br />
1.8 50.00 90.00<br />
Total Cost<br />
Grand Total 9152.84<br />
Cost Estimation say 9152.00<br />
Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-<strong>11</strong> 99
DWDU, Rajkot<br />
Table no 36.i: Technical details <strong>of</strong> Check dam<br />
Quantity & Cost Estimation <strong>of</strong> Check dam<br />
S.no Particular No. Length Width H/D/T Quantity Unit Rate Amount<br />
1 Excavation<br />
1.1 Body wall 1 20.0 1.46 1.4 40.88 Cu.mt.<br />
1.2 Appron 1 20.00 1.80 1.40 50.40<br />
1.3 Side wall 2 5.00 0.60 1.40 8.40<br />
1.4 Abutment 2 2.50 1.00 1.40 7.00<br />
1.5 Wing wall 2 2.26 0.60 1.40 3.80<br />
2 1:4:8<br />
Total Excavation <strong>11</strong>0.47 Cum. 41.00 4529.55<br />
2.1 Body wall 1 20.00 1.46 0.15 4.38<br />
2.2 Appron 1 20.00 1.80 0.15 5.40<br />
2.3 Side wall 2 5.00 0.60 0.15 0.90<br />
2.4 Abutment 2 2.50 1.00 0.15 0.75<br />
2.5 Wing wall 2 2.26 0.60 0.15 0.41<br />
3 U C R Masonary <strong>11</strong>.837 Cum. 1460 17281.73<br />
3.1 Body wall 1 20.00 1.46 1.25 36.50<br />
3.2 Body Wall s/s 1 20.00 1.13 0.90 20.34<br />
3.3 Appron 1 20.00 1.80 1.15 41.40<br />
3.4 Side wall 2 5.00 0.60 2.65 15.90<br />
3.5 Abutment 2 2.50 1.00 3.45 17.25<br />
3.6 Wing wall 2 2.26 0.60 4.43 12.00<br />
143.391 Cum. 1330.00 190709.50<br />
Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-<strong>11</strong> 100
DWDU, Rajkot<br />
4 1:2:4<br />
4.1 Body wall 1 20.00 0.80 0.10 1.60<br />
4.2 Appron 1 20.00 1.80 0.10 3.60<br />
4.3 Side wall 2 5.00 0.60 0.10 0.60<br />
4.4 Abutment 2 2.50 1.00 0.10 0.50<br />
4.5 Wing wall 2 2.26 0.60 0.10 0.27<br />
4.6 End sill 1 20.00 0.30 0.30 1.80<br />
5 Plastering<br />
Body wall S/S 1 20 1.00 20.00<br />
Body wall D/S 1 20.0 1.45 29.00<br />
Abutment 4 2.00 1.9 15.2<br />
CC 8.371 Cum. 2420.00 20258.3<br />
Wing wall 4 2.3 1.45 13.34 Sq.Mt.<br />
77.54 74.00 5737.96<br />
5 Earthen work<br />
5.1 R – Bank 1 15.0 2.20 1.20 39.60<br />
5.2 L – Bank 1 16.0 2.20 1.20 42.24<br />
15% Shrinkage Minus 12.28<br />
81.84<br />
69.564 Cum. 2852.12<br />
Cum. 241369.2<br />
Total Cost Say 241370.00<br />
Grand Total 241370.00<br />
Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-<strong>11</strong> 101
DWDU, Rajkot<br />
Table no.37: Activities related to Surface water resources in (all financial figures in lakh Rs.) Kanpar<br />
Proposed target<br />
Augmentation/ repair <strong>of</strong><br />
S.<br />
No.<br />
Village<br />
name<br />
1 Kanapar<br />
Construction <strong>of</strong> new structures<br />
Total target<br />
existing structures<br />
Type <strong>of</strong> structures Area to<br />
Area to<br />
Area to<br />
Storage Estimated<br />
Storage<br />
Storage<br />
be<br />
be<br />
Estimated be<br />
No. capacity cost No. capacity<br />
capacity<br />
irrigated<br />
irrigated<br />
cost irrigated<br />
(Cumec) (Lac)<br />
(Cumec)<br />
(m<br />
(ha)<br />
(ha)<br />
(ha)<br />
)<br />
Farm Pond 15 34 1097 4.00 4.00<br />
Check dam deepening 5 55 12195 3.5 - - - - 55 12195 3.5<br />
Irrigation/Percolation<br />
Tank 2 22 10975 4.5 3 38 14634 8 60 25609 12.5<br />
Estimated<br />
cost<br />
(Lac)<br />
Check dam & Causeway<br />
cum check dam 8 120 240000 <strong>11</strong>.5 16 170 308333 33 290 548333 44.5<br />
Total 15 197 263170 19.5 34 208 322967 45 405 586138 64.5<br />
Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-<strong>11</strong> 102
DWDU, Rajkot<br />
Table no.37.1: Activities related to Surface water resources in Juna pipliya(all financial figures in lakh Rs.)<br />
Proposed target<br />
Augmentation/ repair <strong>of</strong><br />
S.<br />
No.<br />
1<br />
Village<br />
name<br />
Construction <strong>of</strong> new structures<br />
Total target<br />
existing structures<br />
Type <strong>of</strong> structures Area to<br />
Area to<br />
Area to<br />
Storage Estimated<br />
Storage<br />
Storage<br />
be<br />
be<br />
Estimated be<br />
No. capacity cost No. capacity<br />
capacity<br />
irrigated<br />
irrigated<br />
cost irrigated<br />
(Cumec) (Lac)<br />
(Cumec)<br />
(m<br />
(ha)<br />
(ha)<br />
(ha)<br />
)<br />
Farm pond 5 5 2000 1.00 5 2000 1.00<br />
Check dam deepening 9 100 32540 5.5 - - - - 100 32540 5.5<br />
Irrigation/Percolation<br />
Estimated<br />
cost<br />
(Lac)<br />
Juna<br />
pipliya Tank<br />
2 29 14560 3.5 2 56 10000 4.00 85 24560 7.5<br />
Check dam & Causeway<br />
cum check dam<br />
13 300 32720 <strong>11</strong>.0 <strong>11</strong> 100 12050 19.6 400 44770 30.6<br />
Total 24 429 79820 20 18 161 24050 24.6 590 103870 44.6<br />
Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-<strong>11</strong> 103
DWDU, Rajkot<br />
Table no.37.2: Activities related to Surface water resources in Jivapar (all financial figures in lakh Rs.)<br />
Proposed target<br />
Augmentation/ repair <strong>of</strong><br />
Construction <strong>of</strong> new structures Total target<br />
existing structures<br />
S. Village<br />
Type <strong>of</strong> structures Area to<br />
Area to<br />
Area to<br />
No. name<br />
Storage Estimated<br />
Storage<br />
Storage Estimated<br />
be<br />
be<br />
Estimated be<br />
No. capacity cost No. capacity<br />
capacity cost<br />
irrigated<br />
irrigated<br />
cost irrigated<br />
(Cumec) (Lac)<br />
(Cumec)<br />
(m<br />
(ha)<br />
(ha)<br />
(ha)<br />
) (Lac)<br />
Farm pond 20 20 10000 4.0 20 8000 4.0<br />
1 Jivapar<br />
Irrigation/Percolation<br />
Tank<br />
2 22 16350 6.0 2 20 18930 6.0 20 18930 12.0<br />
Check dam & Causeway<br />
cum check dam<br />
19 350 34860 20.3 14 250 28535 24.5 600 63395 44.8<br />
Total 21 372 51210 26.3 36 290 57465 34.5 662 108675 60.8<br />
Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-<strong>11</strong> 104
DWDU, Rajkot<br />
Table no.37.3: Activities related to Surface water resources in Dolatpar (all financial figures in lakh Rs.)<br />
Proposed target<br />
Augmentation/ repair <strong>of</strong><br />
Construction <strong>of</strong> new structures Total target<br />
existing structures<br />
S. Village<br />
Type <strong>of</strong> structures Area to<br />
Area to<br />
Area to<br />
No. name<br />
Storage Estimated<br />
Storage<br />
Storage Estimated<br />
be<br />
be<br />
Estimated be<br />
No. capacity cost No. capacity<br />
capacity cost<br />
irrigated<br />
irrigated<br />
cost irrigated<br />
(Cumec) (Lac)<br />
(Cumec)<br />
(m<br />
(ha)<br />
(ha)<br />
(ha)<br />
) (Lac)<br />
Farm pond 5 5 2000 1.00 5 2000 1.00<br />
Irrigation/Percolation<br />
1 Dolatpar Tank<br />
1 12 15000 1.0 1 50 22560 3.00 62 37560 4.0<br />
Check dam & Causeway<br />
cum check dam<br />
6 90 24580 5.0 5 60 28570 12.0 150 53150 17.0<br />
Total 7 102 39580 6.5 <strong>11</strong> <strong>11</strong>5 53130 16.00 230 92710 22.00<br />
Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-<strong>11</strong> 105
DWDU, Rajkot<br />
Table no. 37.4: Activities related to Surface water resources in Sanathali (all financial figures in lakh Rs.)<br />
S.<br />
No.<br />
Village<br />
name<br />
Type <strong>of</strong> structures<br />
Augmentation/ repair <strong>of</strong><br />
existing structures<br />
Area to<br />
Storage<br />
be<br />
No. capacity<br />
irrigated<br />
(Cumec)<br />
(ha)<br />
Estimated<br />
cost<br />
(Lac)<br />
Proposed target<br />
Construction <strong>of</strong> new structures<br />
Area to<br />
Storage<br />
be<br />
No. capacity<br />
irrigated<br />
(Cumec)<br />
(ha)<br />
Estimated<br />
cost<br />
Area to<br />
be<br />
irrigated<br />
Total target<br />
Storage<br />
capacity<br />
(m 3 )<br />
Estimated<br />
cost<br />
(Lac)<br />
(ha)<br />
Farm pond 3 2 2500 1.00 50 50 24400 10.00 52 26900 <strong>11</strong>.00<br />
Check dam deepening 10 20 15470 6.0 20 15470 6.0<br />
Irrigation/Percolation<br />
1 Sanathali<br />
1 10 12680 2.5 6 80 45620 15.0 90<br />
17.5<br />
Tank<br />
58300<br />
Check dam & Causeway<br />
12 30 22560 6.0 43 900 128480 75.18 930<br />
81.18<br />
cum check dam<br />
151040<br />
Total 26 62 53210 15.5 99 1030 198500 100.18 1090 251710 <strong>11</strong>5.68<br />
Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-<strong>11</strong> 106
DWDU, Rajkot<br />
Table no.38: Activities related to recharging ground water resources in the project areas (all financial figures in lakh Rs.)<br />
Proposed target<br />
S.<br />
No.<br />
Name <strong>of</strong> Villages<br />
Type <strong>of</strong> structures<br />
Augmentation/ repair <strong>of</strong><br />
existing recharging<br />
structures<br />
No.<br />
Area to be<br />
irrigated<br />
(ha)<br />
Estimated<br />
cost<br />
No.<br />
Construction <strong>of</strong> new<br />
recharging structures<br />
Area to be<br />
irrigated<br />
(ha)<br />
Estimated<br />
cost<br />
Area to be<br />
irrigated<br />
(ha)<br />
Total target<br />
Estimated<br />
cost<br />
1 Kanpar Open wells 1 0.5 0.50 10 9 1.<strong>11</strong> 9.5 1.61<br />
2 Juna Pipaliya Open wells 2 1.5 0.95 17 12 1.884 13.5 2.864<br />
Open wells 8 10 0.88 10 0.88<br />
Bore wells 2 1.7 0.50 1.7 0.50<br />
Underground<br />
3 Jivapar<br />
1 - 1.50 - 1.50<br />
checkdam (Dyke)<br />
Total for the<br />
village<br />
- - - <strong>11</strong> <strong>11</strong>.7 1.9 <strong>11</strong>.7 2.88<br />
4 Dolatpar Open wells 4 7 0.44 7 0.44<br />
Open wells 3 5 2.4 30 32 3.30 37 5.74<br />
Borewell 2 3.5 1.0 3.5 1.0<br />
Underground<br />
5 Sanathali<br />
Total for the<br />
Project<br />
checkdam (Dyke)<br />
Ro<strong>of</strong>water<br />
Harvesting for<br />
recharge<br />
Total for the<br />
village<br />
3 - 4.5 4.5<br />
15 - 6.00 - 6.00<br />
5 8.5 12.4 52 39 14.24 47.5 17.68<br />
8 10.5 13.85 90 71.7 19.134 89.2 25.474<br />
Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-<strong>11</strong> 107
DWDU, Rajkot<br />
Agriculural Improvement programme<br />
Our understanding is that without addressing the crucial area <strong>of</strong> end-use regulation, no amount <strong>of</strong> rainwater harvesting is going to<br />
work. For this the most important requirement is the working out <strong>of</strong> a sustainable package <strong>of</strong> practices for dryland agriculture.<br />
This is moreover an alternative to the Green Revolution, which largely bypassed the drylands or is completely inappropriate for<br />
them. It is believed that the economy must be viewed as a sub-system <strong>of</strong> the larger eco-system, which comprises not merely human<br />
beings but also natural resources and non-human species.<br />
The watershed village area has seen penetration <strong>of</strong> Green Revolution (GR) inputs in agriculture, which is the main occupation <strong>of</strong><br />
the people. Cotton that was the main crop <strong>of</strong> the area is becoming completely unviable because <strong>of</strong> high pesticide costs. Despite<br />
excessive use <strong>of</strong> pesticides, pestilence remains an intractable problem. The inputs available to them are <strong>of</strong>ten sub-quality. For<br />
example, local dealers dispose <strong>of</strong> expired pesticides to illiterate farmers. Farmers are in general suffering because <strong>of</strong> high input<br />
costs. However, their problem is that they perceive no alternative to the GR package. What is worse, the catchment areas have<br />
suffered severe denudation <strong>of</strong> forest cover in recent years. This has raised the rate <strong>of</strong> soil erosion and surface run<strong>of</strong>f. Biodiversity<br />
has also been adversely affected. There is a fodder and fuel crisis in the area. In the recent 3-year drought, the worst impact was on<br />
cattle. Within this context, our attempt is to forge several new links within the elements <strong>of</strong> the natural resource base <strong>of</strong> the area<br />
(climate, rainfed agriculture, wastelands, forests, and crop residues, animal and human wastes and decentralized energy sources).<br />
With soil and water conservation technologies, surface run<strong>of</strong>f is minimised which improves the level <strong>of</strong> soil moisture. Loss <strong>of</strong><br />
essential soil nutrients is also reduced. And harvested run<strong>of</strong>f is recycled to agricultural land through water harvesting structures.<br />
The utilisation <strong>of</strong> soil moisture through vegetative systems strengthens the flows <strong>of</strong> fodder, firewood. Non-woody biomass from<br />
the regenerated forests and commons, as well as part <strong>of</strong> the crop residues, is returned to the soil through microbial decomposition.<br />
Revegetation <strong>of</strong> the commons also provides material for direct incorporation into soil as green manure. Animal wastes are directed<br />
to biogas plants, from which bio-energy is supplied either to the households for cooking. The organic residue from the biogas plant<br />
(digested slurry) goes to enrich the soil as a nitrogen- rich fertiliser.<br />
Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-<strong>11</strong> 108
DWDU, Rajkot<br />
These are the major components in the agricultural programme to be carried out in the Programme:<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
Seed distribution<br />
Seed multiplication<br />
Screening <strong>of</strong> new varieties with crop demonstration<br />
Nursery raising and organic agriculture practices<br />
Vegetable cultivation<br />
Popularization <strong>of</strong> a package <strong>of</strong> agricultural practices including agricultural machineries<br />
Floriculture<br />
Horticultural plantation<br />
Non Pesticide Management<br />
Vermi-composting<br />
Phoenix/date-palm plantation along the stream banks on farm bunds<br />
Jatropha plantation along fencing and on wastelands<br />
Afforestation<br />
Familarisation <strong>of</strong> new agricultural implements<br />
Improved irrigation facilities<br />
Low cost green house<br />
Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-<strong>11</strong> 109
DWDU, Rajkot<br />
Our effort has been to introduce a complete alternative to hybrid seeds and the Green Revolution package and practices as listed<br />
above. As a trial <strong>of</strong> the recommended practice <strong>of</strong> intercropping <strong>of</strong> different crops, farmers <strong>of</strong> the project area were chosen for Front<br />
Line Demonstrations (FLDs). These demonstrations attempt to make certain type <strong>of</strong> crop varieties popular again by showing the<br />
possibility <strong>of</strong> intercropping with a cash crop. The model, thus, attempts to show the households the possibility <strong>of</strong> getting some<br />
extra cash income while ensuring food security. In collaboration with ICRISAT, Hyderabad, Junagarh Agricultural University, KVK-<br />
Targharia and Kutch, Rajkot, we will carry out trials <strong>of</strong> composite varieties <strong>of</strong> different crops as trail or demonstration plot. Seeds<br />
<strong>of</strong> varieties identified as suitable to the area will be disseminated to more than 100 farmers in watershed villages.<br />
The Livestock <strong>Development</strong> Programme<br />
Many new initiatives in the field <strong>of</strong> veterinary care, fodder development, training programmes will be taken up that will<br />
bring the two villages in the diary map. Many <strong>of</strong> theses initiatives yielded results much beyond what we had hoped to achieve,<br />
however the year was also one <strong>of</strong> introspection in terms <strong>of</strong> the absence <strong>of</strong> a the leap in dairy development that we were expecting<br />
from the old routes.<br />
Services to SHG members/UG groups<br />
Veterinary support services will be provided by the veterinary hospitals and in animal husbandry camps. Accordingly<br />
members will be selected by the criteria fixed by the group. Breeds suitable for the area will be brought.<br />
Veterinary Services<br />
Veterinary services will be provided in the cluster villages. The cluster was chosen for the reason that most families in the<br />
area are landless or near-landless. They are highly dependent on small ruminants like cows, buffaloes and other cattle. Vaccination<br />
camps will be conducted time to time against chronic diseases in the larger animals. The location also will be provided with<br />
successful Artificial insemination (AI) services, relying on the supplies provided by the government veterinary hospital in Jasdan.<br />
Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-<strong>11</strong> <strong>11</strong>0
DWDU, Rajkot<br />
In the camp also nutrients and vitamins will be provided for improvement in health <strong>of</strong> animals.<br />
The pregnant cow care programme was a concept borrowed from the Vasudhara Dairy, Valsad, <strong>Gujarat</strong>. This will be<br />
launched with the primary aim <strong>of</strong> demonstrating that the productivity <strong>of</strong> the local cows could be increased with appropriate<br />
feeding practices. Within this programme, veterinary pr<strong>of</strong>essionals would first identify local cows which are pregnant and have<br />
around two more months to go before parturition. Once the animals were identified and if the owner was willing the animals were<br />
put on an intensive feeding and care programme for a three month period, from the start <strong>of</strong> the programme to one month after<br />
parturition. The cost per animal works out to Rs. 3700.The farmer would contribute the dry fodder and green fodder, in kind.<br />
Towards the costs <strong>of</strong> inputs procured from the market (works out to Rs. 1350), the costs were borne in the ratio 60:40 between<br />
WCs and the farmer. Farmers from the project villages will be motivated to participate in the programme.<br />
Training and Exposure visits<br />
A large group <strong>of</strong> people, consisting mainly dairy farmers who will be visiting the successful dairy cooperatives under the<br />
Vasudhara dairy, Valsad and the Amul dairy, Anand for value addition to milk related products. These cooperatives were chosen<br />
mainly for the reason that many <strong>of</strong> the successful dairy farmers in these areas are small farmers belonging to various tribal<br />
communities. These dairies had also built up their business on the hard work <strong>of</strong> women farmers who had taken loans from the<br />
SHGs run by the cooperative union to buy cattle. The interaction will be helpful as dairy co-operative members in other district will<br />
make them to understand how those women, with a similar background, had been able to build up a good livelihood option<br />
revolving around the dairy.<br />
Training addressing the issue <strong>of</strong> infertility in animals will be provided to beneficiary group. Three day training cum exposure visit<br />
will be organized for the team and some farmers to reputed organization. The visit will provide a first hand view <strong>of</strong> the options<br />
open to dryland farmers to ensure the availability <strong>of</strong> good quality fodder. The farmers who had adopted such practices<br />
demonstrated how it could help in cutting down the cost <strong>of</strong> feed concentrates.<br />
Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-<strong>11</strong> <strong>11</strong>1
DWDU, Rajkot<br />
One day training on azolla cultivation, as a means <strong>of</strong> providing high protein feed to livestock, will be organized by KVK.<br />
Scientist from the KVK, will demonstrate the simple method by which azolla could be grown in the backyard <strong>of</strong> farmers.<br />
Demonstration pits are expected to set up in the demonstration plot <strong>of</strong> farmers.<br />
Table no.39: Details <strong>of</strong> activities related to livelihood, production system and micro-enterprises: Kanpar<br />
S.<br />
No.<br />
Name <strong>of</strong> village<br />
Agriculture<br />
Name <strong>of</strong> activity<br />
(i) Private<br />
Type <strong>of</strong> land Executing agency Target<br />
(iii)<br />
Expected<br />
(i) UG Estimated<br />
Others<br />
month & year<br />
(ii) Community<br />
(ii)SHG<br />
cost<br />
(pl.<br />
<strong>of</strong> completion<br />
(iii) WC (Rs. in lakh)<br />
specify)<br />
(mm/yyyy)<br />
Horticultural Plantation(5000<br />
no)<br />
Private WC/UG 2.5<br />
Crop demo./Organic Agriculture Private UG/SHG 1.5<br />
Agricultural demo in villages Community PIA/WC 1.5<br />
Vermi Composting-20 unit Community UG 2.2<br />
Vegetable selling (lari)-5 Private PIA/UG 0.55<br />
Vegetable cultivation Private WC/UG 0.80<br />
Drip irrigation (Small farmer) Private WC/UG 1.90<br />
Agro forestry<br />
Fodder Seeds on farm bunds Community WC/UG 1.0<br />
Fodder plot Community SHG/UG 2.0<br />
Live fencing-Jatropha 0.58<br />
Agro processing /Agro machinery<br />
Agri spray pump (20 no) Private Community UG/SHG 1.0<br />
Agricultural<br />
machinaries(Assetless)<br />
Community SHG/UG 2.97<br />
Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-<strong>11</strong> <strong>11</strong>2
DWDU, Rajkot<br />
Animal husbandry<br />
Animal nutrients Community UG/SHG 2.35<br />
Animal Camp (5 times) Community PIA/WC 2.5<br />
Other minor activities<br />
Centering instrument Community UG/SHG 2.6<br />
Revolving fund Private SHG 1.5<br />
Cement block production SC<br />
mohalla<br />
Community UG/SHG 2.0<br />
Hair saloon kits-5 UG/SHG 0.15<br />
Foot wear repeir kit-3 Community UG 0.12<br />
Bhajan mandali instrument Private Community UG/SHG 0.50<br />
Flour mills Community UG/SHG 0.75<br />
Total :30.97<br />
Table no.39.1: Details <strong>of</strong> activities related to livelihood, production system and micro-enterprises: Junapipliya<br />
S.<br />
No.<br />
Name <strong>of</strong> village<br />
Agriculture<br />
Name <strong>of</strong> activity<br />
(i) Private<br />
Type <strong>of</strong> land Executing agency Target<br />
(iii)<br />
Expected<br />
(i) UG Estimated<br />
Others<br />
month & year<br />
(ii) Community<br />
(ii)SHG<br />
cost<br />
(pl.<br />
<strong>of</strong> completion<br />
(iii) WC (Rs. in lakh)<br />
specify)<br />
(mm/yyyy)<br />
Afforestation Community WC 2.0<br />
Bamboo Plantation Private Community UG/SHG 1.0<br />
Horticultural Plantation Private PIA/WC/SHG 2.0<br />
Crop demo./Organic Agriculture-<br />
5 no<br />
Private UG/SHG 1.5<br />
Vermi Composting-10 unit Community UG/SHG 1.0<br />
Drip kits Private 1.64<br />
Agro forestry<br />
Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-<strong>11</strong> <strong>11</strong>3
DWDU, Rajkot<br />
Fodder Seeds on Farmbunds Community WC/UG 0.8<br />
Jatropha Private 0.5<br />
Agro processing /Agro machinery<br />
Agri spray pump 20 no Private Community UG 1.0<br />
Agri machinery for assetless Private SHG 2.0<br />
Animal husbandry<br />
Animal nutrients Community PIA/UG/SHG 1.5<br />
Animal Camp (5 times) Community PIA/WC 2.5<br />
Other minor activities<br />
Centering instrument Community UG/SHG 3.0<br />
Revolving fund Private SHG 0.50<br />
Kits for barber-2 Private Community UG 0.17<br />
Total : 21.61 lakhs<br />
Table no.39.2: Details <strong>of</strong> activities related to livelihood, production system and micro-enterprises: Jivapar<br />
S.<br />
No.<br />
Name <strong>of</strong> village<br />
Jivapar<br />
Agriculture<br />
Name <strong>of</strong> activity<br />
(i) Private<br />
Type <strong>of</strong> land Executing agency Target<br />
(iii)<br />
Expected<br />
(i) UG Estimated<br />
Others<br />
month & year<br />
(ii) Community<br />
(ii)SHG<br />
cost<br />
(pl.<br />
<strong>of</strong> completion<br />
(iii) WC (Rs. in lakh)<br />
specify)<br />
(mm/yyyy)<br />
Low cost green house (2) Private UG/SHG 1.5<br />
Plantation (1 ha) Private Community UG/WC 1.75<br />
Distribution <strong>of</strong> Horticulture<br />
(2500 no)<br />
Private PIA/WC 1.25<br />
Crop demo./Organic Agriculture-<br />
5 no<br />
Private UG/SHG 1.0<br />
Vermi Composting-15 unit Community UG 1.5<br />
Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-<strong>11</strong> <strong>11</strong>4
DWDU, Rajkot<br />
Vegetable selling cart-5 Private PIA/UG 0.5<br />
Drip irrigation kits Private WC/UG 1.00<br />
Agro forestry<br />
Fodder Seeds spred on goucher<br />
and farm bunds<br />
Community WC/UG 1.2<br />
Bamboo Plantation Community SHG 0.80<br />
Making broom Community SHG 0.80<br />
Agro processing /Agro machinery<br />
Agri spray pump 20 no Private Community UG 1.0<br />
Agril machineries Community SHG 2.97<br />
Flour mills Assetless Community UG/SHG 1.5<br />
Animal husbandry<br />
Animal nutrient sell for assetless Community PIA/UG/SHG 2.0<br />
Animal Camp (5 times) Community PIA/WC 2.5<br />
Fish cultivation Community PIA/WC 2.58<br />
Dairy development instruments Private PIA/UG/SHG 1.25<br />
Other minor activities<br />
Carpenter kit Community UG/SHG 0.3<br />
Barber kit-2 Private Community UG 0.25<br />
Bhajan mandali instrument Private Community UG/SHG 0.8<br />
Foot wear repair kit-2 Community UG 0.2<br />
Revolving fund Private SHG 1.5<br />
Skill development kits Community UG/SHG 1.0<br />
Total :29.15 lakhs<br />
Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-<strong>11</strong> <strong>11</strong>5
DWDU, Rajkot<br />
Table no. 39.3: Details <strong>of</strong> activities related to livelihood, production system and micro-enterprises: Dolatpar<br />
S.<br />
No.<br />
Name <strong>of</strong><br />
village<br />
Dolatpar<br />
Agriculture<br />
Name <strong>of</strong> activity<br />
(i) Private<br />
Type <strong>of</strong> land<br />
(ii)<br />
Community<br />
(iii)<br />
Others<br />
(pl.<br />
specify)<br />
Executing<br />
agency<br />
(i) UG<br />
(ii)SHG<br />
(iii) WC<br />
Estimated<br />
cost<br />
(Rs. in<br />
lakh)<br />
Vermi Composting-10 unit Community SHG/UG 1.00<br />
Agricultural demonstration Community PIA/WC 0.50<br />
Agro forestry<br />
Fodder plantation on farm<br />
bunds/Goucher<br />
Community WC/UG 1.01<br />
Agro processing /Agro<br />
machinery<br />
Agri machinaries Community SHG 1.50<br />
Animal husbandry<br />
Target<br />
Animal nutrient Community UG/SHG 0.50<br />
Animal Camp (5 times) Community PIA/WC 2.00<br />
Hair salun kit-2 Private Community UG 0.14<br />
Revolving fund Private SHG 1.00<br />
Brick production Community UG/SHG 1.00<br />
Total : 8.65 lakhs<br />
Expected<br />
month &<br />
year <strong>of</strong><br />
completion<br />
(mm/yyyy)<br />
Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-<strong>11</strong> <strong>11</strong>6
DWDU, Rajkot<br />
Table no. 39.4: Details <strong>of</strong> activities related to livelihood, production system and micro-enterprises: Sanathali<br />
S.<br />
No.<br />
Name <strong>of</strong><br />
village<br />
Sanathali<br />
Agriculture<br />
Name <strong>of</strong> activity<br />
(i) Private<br />
Type <strong>of</strong> land<br />
(ii)<br />
Community<br />
(iii)<br />
Others<br />
(pl.<br />
specify)<br />
Executing<br />
agency<br />
(i) UG<br />
(ii)SHG<br />
(iii) WC<br />
Estimated<br />
cost<br />
(Rs. in<br />
lakh)<br />
Floriculture (2 ha) Private Community UG/SHG 2.0<br />
Distribution <strong>of</strong> Horticultural<br />
plants (40000 no)<br />
Private Community PIA/UG/WC 14.0<br />
Crop demo./Organic Agriculture Private Community KVK/UG/WC 4.0<br />
Vermi Composting/Vermi-wash-<br />
100 unit<br />
Private Community PIA/SHG/UG 10.0<br />
Vegetable selling (cart)-10 Private PIA/UG 1.25<br />
Drip irrigation kits Private Community UG/WC 5.5<br />
Nursery raising no. 2 Private Community SHG/UG 2.5<br />
Low cost green housing Private WC/UG 3.5<br />
Vegetable cultivation Private Community SHG/UG 3.0<br />
Agro forestry<br />
Making broom SC benificiaries Community SHG 2.0<br />
Jatropha fencing Community 0.80<br />
Agro processing /Agro<br />
machinery<br />
Agri machinaries for assetless Community SHG 3.0<br />
Milk products Community SHG 1.5<br />
Target<br />
Expected<br />
month &<br />
year <strong>of</strong><br />
completion<br />
(mm/yyyy)<br />
Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-<strong>11</strong> <strong>11</strong>7
DWDU, Rajkot<br />
Animal husbandry<br />
Animal nutrient/Khandan sell<br />
assetless<br />
Community PIA/UG/WC 5.0<br />
Milk storage refrigerator Community SHG 2.0<br />
Poulty farm (10 SC Beneficiaries) Private Community SHG 3.0<br />
Animal Camp (6 times) Community PIA/WC 3.6<br />
Other minor activities<br />
Immitation/Stitching machinery Private Community UG/SHG 2.2<br />
Revolving fund Private SHG 2.5<br />
Hair salun kit-10 Private Community UG/SHG 0.40<br />
Foot wear repair kit-2 Community UG 0.18<br />
Cloth tailor material-4 Community UG/SHG 1.3<br />
Skill improvement<br />
kits(Masons/Lohari/Sutari/other<br />
Community UG/SHG 7.0<br />
)<br />
Total : 80.23 lakhs<br />
Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-<strong>11</strong> <strong>11</strong>8
DWDU, Rajkot<br />
Table no. 40: Activities related to livelihoods by Self Help Groups (SHGs) in the project areas<br />
S. No.<br />
Major activities <strong>of</strong> the SHGs<br />
Names <strong>of</strong><br />
Villages Name <strong>of</strong> activity No. <strong>of</strong> SHGs involved<br />
Average annual income from<br />
activity per SHG (In Rs. Approx)<br />
Vermi composting 1 76800<br />
Nursery raising 1 10000<br />
Vegetable cultivation 1 89675<br />
1 Kanpar<br />
2 Juna Pipaliya<br />
Fodder grass 1 85440<br />
Crop demo./Organic Agriculture 1 30000<br />
Agr machinery for asset less group 1 84000<br />
Centering instrument SC group 1 90000<br />
Agri processing –Flour mill 1 32000<br />
Fodder 1 64000<br />
Crop demonstration 1 86400<br />
Organic Agriculture (5 ha) 1 64080<br />
Vegetable cultivation 1 88900<br />
Agril machinery for assetless group 1 52000<br />
Vermi composting 1 109000<br />
Nursery raising 1 50000<br />
3 Jivapar Vermi composting 1 125000<br />
Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-<strong>11</strong> <strong>11</strong>9
DWDU, Rajkot<br />
Centering/Masoning instruments 1 175000<br />
Fodder Bank 1 227500<br />
Flour mill 1 72000<br />
Fodder grass 1 25000<br />
Crop demonstration 1 18000<br />
80100<br />
Organic Agriculture (5 ha) 1<br />
Pickle unit (Lemon,Chilli) 1 4800<br />
Vegetable cultivation <strong>11</strong> farmer 1 27500<br />
Fish cultivation 1 51600<br />
Vermi composting 1 109000<br />
4 Dolatpar<br />
Animal nutrient -landless 1 92820<br />
Agri machinaries 1 125000<br />
Vermi composting 1 109000<br />
Brick production 1 90000<br />
5 Sanathali<br />
Floriculture (2 ha) 1 109000<br />
Crop demo./Organic Agriculture 1<br />
Vegetable selling (cart)-10 1 92820<br />
Vegetable cultivation 1 90000<br />
Agri machinaries for assetless 1 125000<br />
Milk products 1 <strong>11</strong>2000<br />
Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-<strong>11</strong> 120
DWDU, Rajkot<br />
Animal nutrient/Khandan sell<br />
assetless<br />
1 175000<br />
Poulty farm (10 SC Beneficiaries) 1 260000<br />
Immitation/Stitching machinery 2 198000<br />
Table no. 41: Linkages developed at village level<br />
Sr. No. Village Name <strong>of</strong> activity<br />
Dairy development<br />
1 <strong>IWMP</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />
Vermi compositing<br />
Forward/Backward<br />
linkage<br />
Avado, ,Fodder plot ,<br />
AI, Nutrient vitamin<br />
minerals ,milk<br />
collection centre<br />
Dairy farmers ,<br />
Nursery<br />
Linkage with<br />
Farmers , Feed stall,<br />
Dairy cooperative,<br />
Farmers related to<br />
organic agriculture,<br />
vegetable<br />
Outcome<br />
Increase in Milk<br />
production, dairy<br />
products ,better health<br />
care <strong>of</strong> animal<br />
Better soil health,<br />
increased production<br />
Table no.42: Details <strong>of</strong> activities connected with vegetative cover in watershed works: Kanpar<br />
S. Name <strong>of</strong><br />
Executing<br />
Type <strong>of</strong> treatment<br />
Type <strong>of</strong> land<br />
No village<br />
agency<br />
.<br />
(i) UG<br />
Name <strong>of</strong><br />
Kanpar<br />
(i) (ii) (iii)<br />
(iii) (ii)SHG<br />
structure/<br />
Ridge Drainage Land (i) (ii) Others (iii) Area<br />
work<br />
area line dev. Private Community (pl. Others (ha)<br />
(R) (D) (L)<br />
specify) (pl.<br />
specify)<br />
No. <strong>of</strong><br />
plants<br />
Target<br />
Estimated<br />
cost<br />
(Rs. in<br />
lakh)<br />
Jatropha L C WC/SHG 1 2500 0.32<br />
Fodder R L C UG/SHG 2 1.78<br />
Horticulture R D L P UG 1.67 186 0.77<br />
Expected<br />
month &<br />
year <strong>of</strong><br />
completio<br />
n (mm/<br />
yyyy)<br />
Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-<strong>11</strong> 121
DWDU, Rajkot<br />
Nursery<br />
raising<br />
Crop<br />
demonstratio<br />
n<br />
D L P C SHG 2 10000 0.74<br />
L D L P UG/WC 3 1.50<br />
Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-<strong>11</strong> 122
DWDU, Rajkot<br />
Table no.42.1: Details <strong>of</strong> activities connected with vegetative cover in watershed works: Juna Pipaliya<br />
S.<br />
No<br />
.<br />
1<br />
Name <strong>of</strong><br />
village<br />
Juna<br />
Pipaliya<br />
Type <strong>of</strong> treatment Type <strong>of</strong> land<br />
Executing<br />
agency<br />
Target<br />
(i) UG<br />
Name <strong>of</strong> (i)<br />
(ii) (iii)<br />
(iii) (ii)SHG<br />
Estimated<br />
structure/ Ridg<br />
(i)<br />
Drainage Land<br />
(ii) Others (iii) Area No. <strong>of</strong> cost<br />
work e<br />
Privat<br />
line dev. Community (pl. Others (ha) plants (Rs. in<br />
area<br />
e<br />
(D) (L)<br />
specify) (pl.<br />
lakh)<br />
(R)<br />
specify)<br />
Afforestation R D L C WC 1 2100 0.55<br />
Jatropha R L P C WC/SHG 2 2500 0.89<br />
Fodder R L C UG/SHG 5 3.07<br />
Horticulture R L P UG 1.67 7400 2.6<br />
Nursery<br />
raising<br />
D L P UG/SHG 5 25000 1.00<br />
Vegetable<br />
cultivation<br />
4.35 1.70<br />
Peasture Land<br />
Demostration<br />
L P C SHG 5.00 5 0.26<br />
Grassland<br />
development<br />
R D C WC/SHG 3 0.60<br />
Crop<br />
demonstration<br />
L P UG/WC 2.5 10 2.69<br />
Expected<br />
month &<br />
year <strong>of</strong><br />
completi<br />
on (mm/<br />
yyyy)<br />
Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-<strong>11</strong> 123
DWDU, Rajkot<br />
Table no.42.2: Details <strong>of</strong> activities connected with vegetative cover in watershed works: Jivapar<br />
Type <strong>of</strong> treatment<br />
Type <strong>of</strong> land<br />
Executing<br />
agency<br />
(i) UG<br />
Name Name <strong>of</strong><br />
(i) (ii) (iii)<br />
(iii) (ii)SHG<br />
<strong>of</strong> structure/<br />
Ridge Drainage Land (i) (ii) Others (iii) Area<br />
village work<br />
area line dev. Private Community (pl. Others (ha)<br />
(R) (D) (L)<br />
specify) (pl.<br />
specify)<br />
S.<br />
No<br />
.<br />
1<br />
Jivapar<br />
No. <strong>of</strong><br />
plants<br />
Target<br />
Estimated<br />
cost<br />
(Rs. in<br />
lakh)<br />
Afforestation R D L C WC 0.5 1000 0.55<br />
Jatropha R L P C WC/SHG 3 2500 0.89<br />
Agro-forestry D L P C WC/SHG 0.25 78 0.55<br />
Fodder R L C UG/SHG 7 1.35<br />
Horticulture R L P UG 1.67 7400 1.35<br />
Nursery<br />
raising<br />
Grassland<br />
development<br />
Crop<br />
demonstratio<br />
n<br />
D L P UG/SHG 5 25000 0.50<br />
R D C WC/SHG 5 1.52<br />
L P UG/WC 8 2.23<br />
Expected<br />
month &<br />
year <strong>of</strong><br />
completio<br />
n (mm/<br />
yyyy)<br />
Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-<strong>11</strong> 124
DWDU, Rajkot<br />
Table no.42.3: Details <strong>of</strong> activities connected with vegetative cover in watershed works: Dolatpar<br />
Type <strong>of</strong> treatment Type <strong>of</strong> land<br />
Executing<br />
agency<br />
(i) UG<br />
Name <strong>of</strong> (i) (ii) (iii)<br />
(iii) (ii)SHG<br />
Name<br />
(i) (ii)<br />
structure/ work Ridge Drainage Land<br />
Others (iii) Area No. <strong>of</strong><br />
<strong>of</strong><br />
Privat Communi<br />
area line dev.<br />
(pl. Others (ha) plants<br />
village<br />
e ty<br />
(R) (D) (L)<br />
specify) (pl.<br />
specify)<br />
S.<br />
No.<br />
Dolatp<br />
ar<br />
Target<br />
Estimated<br />
cost<br />
(Rs. in<br />
lakh)<br />
Jatropha R L P C WC/SHG 4 10000 1.30<br />
Agro-forestry D L P C PIA/WC 0.25 150 1.05<br />
Fodder R L C UG/SHG 7 1.35<br />
Nursery raising D L P UG/SHG 5 30000 0.60<br />
Peasture Land<br />
Demostration<br />
Crop<br />
demonstration<br />
Horticultural<br />
plants<br />
L P C SHG 5.00 5 0.26<br />
L P UG/WC 4.5 2.56<br />
L P<br />
UG<br />
54 17600 2.65<br />
Expected<br />
month &<br />
year <strong>of</strong><br />
completio<br />
n (mm/<br />
yyyy)<br />
Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-<strong>11</strong> 125
DWDU, Rajkot<br />
Table no.42.3: Details <strong>of</strong> activities connected with vegetative cover in watershed works: Sanathali<br />
Executing<br />
Type <strong>of</strong> treatment Type <strong>of</strong> land<br />
agency<br />
(i) UG<br />
Name<br />
S.<br />
Name <strong>of</strong> (i) (ii) (iii)<br />
(iii) (ii)SHG<br />
<strong>of</strong><br />
(i) (ii)<br />
No.<br />
structure/ work Ridge Drainage Land<br />
Others (iii) Area No. <strong>of</strong><br />
village<br />
Privat Communi<br />
area line dev.<br />
(pl. Others (ha) plants<br />
e ty<br />
(R) (D) (L)<br />
specify) (pl.<br />
specify)<br />
Target<br />
Estimated<br />
cost<br />
(Rs. in<br />
lakh)<br />
Expected<br />
month &<br />
year <strong>of</strong><br />
completio<br />
n (mm/<br />
yyyy)<br />
1<br />
Sanat<br />
hali<br />
Jatropha R L P C WC/SHG 4 10000 1.30<br />
Agro-forestry D L P C PIA/WC 0.25 150 1.05<br />
Fodder/Phoeni<br />
x<br />
R L C UG/SHG 7 1.35<br />
Nursery raising D L P UG/SHG 5 30000 0.60<br />
Peasture Land<br />
Demostration<br />
L P C SHG 5.00 5 0.26<br />
Grassland<br />
development<br />
R D C WC/SHG 4 1.52<br />
Crop<br />
demonstration<br />
L P UG/WC 4.5 2.56<br />
Floriculture L P UG/SHG 2 48000 1.88<br />
Horticultural<br />
UG<br />
L P<br />
plants<br />
54 17600 2.65<br />
Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-<strong>11</strong> 126
DWDU, Rajkot<br />
Livelihood Intervention<br />
Promotion <strong>of</strong> micro-enterprises and various income generation activities is an important aspect <strong>of</strong> empowerment. Although it is<br />
extremely difficult to find remunerative self employment, there are enormous untapped opportunities in the rural sector. These<br />
include both on-farm and <strong>of</strong>f-farm opportunities. Typically families living below poverty line, SC, ST and landless in a cluster <strong>of</strong><br />
villages are motivated to take part in holistic development through livelihood opportunities through multidisciplinary<br />
interventions.<br />
Advantages <strong>of</strong> Agro-Based Activities: While promoting various income generation activities, agro-based activities have<br />
advantages because <strong>of</strong> the following reasons:<br />
1. Target groups are acquainted with most <strong>of</strong> the basic skills.<br />
2. Easy access to inputs.<br />
3. No problems <strong>of</strong> marketing, as most <strong>of</strong> the outputs are locally consumed as food.<br />
4. As over 50-60 % <strong>of</strong> the rural families own land and livestock, income generation activities can be initiated immediately without<br />
heavy capital investment.<br />
5. Risk <strong>of</strong> failure due to improper technology, poor quality, low demand and poor price recovery are very low. Hence, the chances<br />
<strong>of</strong> success are high.<br />
6. Infrastructure required for promotion <strong>of</strong> on-farm activities has been very well established. Hence, the entrepreneurs can<br />
progress even in backward regions, which are deprived <strong>of</strong> regular power supply and electronic information connectivity. It is<br />
therefore advantageous to tap all the opportunities to promote various on-farm activities. The experience has confirmed that the<br />
best strategy to promote income generation activities through SHGs is to analyze the on-going agro-based activities undertaken by<br />
the members and introduce suitable interventions to enhance the production. There are also excellent opportunities to improve<br />
post production management <strong>of</strong> the produce through grading, storage, processing and marketing.<br />
Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-<strong>11</strong> 127
DWDU, Rajkot<br />
Various micro-enterprises activities through UG and Self Help Groups will be promoted. The list <strong>of</strong> micro-enterprises taken up by<br />
various SHGs is presented below. Among these activities, agriculture followed by animal husbandry, Khadi making units and food<br />
processing. However, over a period <strong>of</strong> time, agriculture, animal husbandry and food processing supercede the trade as many<br />
individuals participate in enhancing their production at the family level and try to organize themselves to market them collectively.<br />
Other activities such as production <strong>of</strong> utility items, construction related activities, handicrafts and Moti work find it difficult to<br />
sustain due to poor marketing infrastructure, lack market and competition from other sources.<br />
Support Needed for Promotion <strong>of</strong> Micro-enterprises<br />
Following support is needed to promote micro-enterprises through women SHGs.<br />
1. Motivation <strong>of</strong> the target communities, particularly women and landless farmers<br />
2. Formation <strong>of</strong> Self Help Groups and their Federations<br />
3. Gender sensitization<br />
4. Training and capacity building<br />
5. Micro-finance. Provision <strong>of</strong> credit facilities and linkage with banks<br />
6. <strong>Development</strong> <strong>of</strong> infrastructure, particularly through the SHG Federations to provide necessary support services and marketing<br />
7. Trade networking and establishment <strong>of</strong> market outlets<br />
8. Village level Information Centre: The multi-disciplinary team interacted with the SHGs and User groups to explore the potentials<br />
for development <strong>of</strong> various enterprises and extend necessary support for dissemination <strong>of</strong> technologies, procurement <strong>of</strong> inputs,<br />
training <strong>of</strong> members and establishment <strong>of</strong> linkage with the market. There should be some agency to provide guidance to the<br />
entrepreneurs as and when needed.<br />
Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-<strong>11</strong> 128
DWDU, Rajkot<br />
The selected production activities for the watershed villages follow the above-mentioned process, and are selected in such a way<br />
that they should be:<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
economically viable<br />
environmentally sustainable<br />
socially equitable<br />
energy efficient<br />
employment generation<br />
Production System-1: Fodder bank for Watershed<br />
villages<br />
Introduction:<br />
"The fodder bank technology is a farming practice whereby leguminous shrubs and grass species are grown on a farm to<br />
provide fodder for livestock sector." It provides a wide range <strong>of</strong> animal products that are rich in high quality proteins and have the<br />
potential as good and sustainable sources <strong>of</strong> income in many areas. Through the dairy cooperative societies, farmers will be<br />
supplied with seeds <strong>of</strong> bajra, multi-cut jowar and cowpea for the summer season; multi cut bajra, multi cut jowar and maize for the<br />
kharif season and bajra and berseem for the rabi season. The demand for fodder seeds was the highest for the rabi season. Farmers<br />
cite the availability <strong>of</strong> green grass in abundance during the rains as a reason for their not devoting acreage solely for fodder during<br />
the kharif season. The accent <strong>of</strong> the programme during the year was to get across the message <strong>of</strong> growing a mixture <strong>of</strong> fodder crops<br />
providing complete nutrition for the animals. The success <strong>of</strong> the programme lay in making available quality fodder seeds to<br />
farmers. One aspect where we could have done better was in getting farmers to try out a mix <strong>of</strong> fodder crops and devote needed<br />
acreage to growing fodder for their animals. The fodder bank ensures fodder availability which in turn reduces the distressed<br />
Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-<strong>11</strong> 129
DWDU, Rajkot<br />
migration <strong>of</strong> the people resulting in sustainable livelihood opportunities and enhances natural resource security in the project<br />
area.<br />
Objective <strong>of</strong> a fodder bank:<br />
1. Build a local fodder bank and organize the distribution <strong>of</strong> fodder during drought and scarce situation. .<br />
2. Establish and maintain village fodder farm in the community grazing area, and allocate the community land for fodder<br />
production, in association with dairy co-operatives.<br />
3. Control regulates and charge in the community grazing and pastures lands.<br />
4. Undertake the distribution <strong>of</strong> fodder seeds and slips in the village.<br />
Primary problem <strong>of</strong> the project<br />
In Sanathali cluster\s villages come under 80% rainfed agriculture and soil is very suitable for fodder crop mainly Jowar,<br />
Bajara,Mainge and sorghum. So fodder bank play an important role to improve fodder for cattles to solve this problem. Majority<br />
<strong>of</strong> farmers own more than 3 ha <strong>of</strong> land for food and fodder production but lack <strong>of</strong> sufficient irrigation water has made these lands<br />
unproductive. The concept <strong>of</strong> fodder bank can overcome the problem <strong>of</strong> seasonal feed shortage, migration and poor animal<br />
performance.<br />
It is the milch animal, which is the worst affected during these periods <strong>of</strong> drought, due to lack <strong>of</strong> productivity <strong>of</strong> sufficient fodder<br />
and water. As a result, the poor are forced to let go with their animals in search <strong>of</strong> fodder and green pastures to other parts <strong>of</strong> the<br />
state. This eventually leads to colossal loss <strong>of</strong> income generating assets, poor demographic pr<strong>of</strong>ile <strong>of</strong> village and low education<br />
level <strong>of</strong> their children.<br />
Even in good years, during harvesting season, the poor tend to sell their crop residue or fodder to earn cash. At such time when<br />
supply is higher than demand, they are not able to sell fodder at remunerative prices. The same fodder is bought back by them,<br />
Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-<strong>11</strong> 130
DWDU, Rajkot<br />
mostly at higher prices during the months <strong>of</strong> scarcity.<br />
To meet the critical needs <strong>of</strong> fodder, especially for the poor families and protect them from inordinately high prices during the<br />
summer months, fodder banks are proposed to be setup at both the village level.<br />
Feasibility <strong>of</strong> Fodder Bank:<br />
A detailed survey and Focused Group Discussion was conducted in all villages <strong>of</strong> the watershed area. The number and type <strong>of</strong><br />
cattle as well as the fodder production capacity <strong>of</strong> the village was collected during door to door survey. In focused group discussion<br />
several factors like the various types <strong>of</strong> fodder available locally, the quantity <strong>of</strong> fodder to be stored in the fodder bank, the size <strong>of</strong><br />
fodder bank, the amount <strong>of</strong> finances required to operate a fodder bank etc were discussed with the farmers, User group and<br />
Watershed committee. The fodder bank should be sustainable and towards that, the sale price <strong>of</strong> fodder should cover operating<br />
costs and losses in storage. All these decisions were taken jointly with the member <strong>of</strong> operating fodder bank.<br />
Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-<strong>11</strong> 131
DWDU, Rajkot<br />
Table 42.i .Primary Model for A Fodder Bank<br />
A<br />
Total Dairy farmers 39<br />
No. <strong>of</strong> adult animals<br />
No. <strong>of</strong> Cattle to be catered by one fodder bank. No. <strong>of</strong> calves<br />
299 36<br />
Total 335<br />
Fodder requirement per day (10kg dry fodder for<br />
adult and 5 kg for calf).<br />
Fodder requirement for 180 days.<br />
Fodder available from lands/farms/pasture land<br />
(60%)<br />
Fodder expected from community land<br />
5025 Kg<br />
9045 quintal<br />
5427 quintal<br />
20 hac *150=3000 quintal<br />
Cost <strong>of</strong> cultivation for fodder production (See Table:2) 105000 Rs<br />
3618-3000=618 quintal<br />
Remaining requirement for 120 days Total Cost Avg.<br />
procurement rate in harvesting season, Rs.500 per<br />
500*618= Rs.309000/-<br />
Qt. including transportation *.Net Cost <strong>of</strong> Fodder<br />
Production "K' (cost <strong>of</strong> cultivation + Cost <strong>of</strong><br />
procurement)<br />
B. Area development for fodder bank Land required Rs 12000<br />
Approx. 3500 m 2 (preferably land will be allotted by<br />
Gram Panchayat @ Rs.600 per month)<br />
Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-<strong>11</strong> 132
DWDU, Rajkot<br />
C. Cl. Fencing + Weighing machine + Small shed + Other<br />
tools.<br />
Rs.70,000/-<br />
D.<br />
Total Cost for Fodder bank (A+B)<br />
Rs. 3,91,000/-<br />
Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-<strong>11</strong> 133
DWDU, Rajkot<br />
Table no: 42.ii: Cost <strong>of</strong> cultivation for fodder production<br />
Cost Detail<br />
Unit cost<br />
1. Cost for tillage 4.5 hour*20 hec*400 Rs 36000<br />
2. Cost for seed 12 kg seed *20 hec *100 Rs 24000<br />
3. Cost for fertilizer Rs 20,000<br />
4. Cost for irrigation Rs 15,000<br />
5. Depreciation cost Rs 10,000<br />
Total cost for 20 hec Rs. 105,000<br />
Table No. 42.iii, Revenue and return Details.<br />
S. No Return Details Cost (in Rs.)<br />
1 Cost <strong>of</strong> fodder Per Kg<br />
= 3,91,100/309000<br />
1.26 Rs/kg<br />
2. Selling Price <strong>of</strong> Fodder Rs 2 /Kg<br />
3. Net selling Price Rs. 723600/-<br />
4. Net Pr<strong>of</strong>it Rs 227500/-<br />
Production <strong>of</strong> Fodder:<br />
We will produce 3000 quintal fodder from community land <strong>of</strong> gram panchayat and for remaining requirement we can fulfill by two<br />
ways first one buy the fodder at the time <strong>of</strong> harvesting and second we can take land on lease agreement from some other government<br />
as well as private agency.<br />
Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-<strong>11</strong> 134
DWDU, Rajkot<br />
Technical Support/Assistance:<br />
To ensure proper technical support for fodder bank and smooth functioning <strong>of</strong> activities the required technical assistance may be<br />
taken from Krishi Vigyan Kendra (KVS), Dept. <strong>of</strong> Agriculture, Dairy and DWDU.<br />
Advantages:<br />
The importance <strong>of</strong> a fodder bank can be well understood. The fodder banks will provide much needed relief and self-reliance to<br />
poor in the village especially in drought condition. Specifically, the advantages are:-<br />
> It will reduce migration during drought condition.<br />
> Farmers can purchase and sale <strong>of</strong> fodder at village level, thus doing away with costs incurred by them to carry out these<br />
transactions at the city market.<br />
> It can reduce in overall market prices <strong>of</strong> fodder during the lean season.<br />
> Ensure availability <strong>of</strong> fodder during the lean season at affordable and reasonable prices.<br />
> Reduced distress sale <strong>of</strong> cattle due to non -availability and / or non-affordability <strong>of</strong> fodder.<br />
> Higher incomes for the poor as cattle will have enough fodder even during the lean season<br />
> Increase employment opportunities at the village level associated with the sale, purchase and storage <strong>of</strong> fodder.<br />
Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-<strong>11</strong> 135
DWDU, Rajkot<br />
Production System - 2: Vermi composting unit for Project villages<br />
Introduction:<br />
The wide spread problems <strong>of</strong> soil degradation and desertification are threatening agricultural sustainability. Throughout the<br />
project village large populations <strong>of</strong> domestic animals producing large amounts <strong>of</strong> organic wastes. These organic residues, or ‘waste<br />
materials’, can be transformed more quickly and into a more useful vermi-compost, available for urban and land application.<br />
Nutrients within vermi-composted material are readily available to plants, and can be added to agricultural land to improve soil<br />
structure and fertility or used as good quality and marketable additive to potting soil or plant growth media. The process <strong>of</strong><br />
composting crop residues using earthworms comprise spreading the agricultural wastes and cow dung in layers as 1 m wide and<br />
0.3 m high beds <strong>of</strong> required length. Earthworms are introduced in between the layers @ 350 worms per m 3 <strong>of</strong> bed volume. The<br />
beds are maintained at about 40 - 50% moisture content and a temperature <strong>of</strong> 20 - 30° C by sprinkling water over the beds. The<br />
earthworms being voracious eaters consume the biodegradable matter and give out a part <strong>of</strong> the matter as excreta or vermicastings.<br />
The vermi-casting containing nutrients are rich manure for the plants.<br />
Objectives<br />
• To train farmers / SHGs in organic farming and vermi-culture.<br />
• To promote production <strong>of</strong> vermi-castings as a viable small business venture<br />
About The Worms<br />
Eisenia fetida, Eudrilus eugeniae, and Perionyx excavatius are some <strong>of</strong> the species for rearing to convert organic wastes into manure.<br />
The worms feed on any biodegradable matter ranging from coir waste to kitchen garbage and Vermi-composting units are ideally<br />
suited to locations / units with generation <strong>of</strong> considerable quantities <strong>of</strong> organic wastes. One earthworm reaching reproductive age<br />
<strong>of</strong> about six weeks lays one egg capsule (containing 7 embryos) every 7 - 10 days. Three to seven worms emerge out <strong>of</strong> each<br />
capsule. Thus, the multiplication <strong>of</strong> worms under optimum growth conditions is very fast. The worms live for about 2 years. Fully<br />
grown worms could be separated and dried in an oven to make 'worm meal' which is a rich source <strong>of</strong> protein (70%) for use in<br />
Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-<strong>11</strong> 136
DWDU, Rajkot<br />
animal feed.<br />
Location<br />
All the villages have lots <strong>of</strong> animal so it can become good composting center as well as good source <strong>of</strong> livelihood. Vermicompost is<br />
very suitable for fruit, flower and vegetable as well as cereal crops. It increases quality and quantity <strong>of</strong> product in per unit area.<br />
Market/Use<br />
Vermi compost is a valuable input for sustainable agriculture and wasteland development. This also can be used widely in pot<br />
culture and in home gardens. Several farmers are successfully using vermi-comost and selling it in nearby markets. The material<br />
can be either sold to forest department nurseries or to farmers practicing organic agriculture. Vermi compost has more nutrient<br />
compare to other manures and fertilizer so by the use <strong>of</strong> compost we can reduce the use <strong>of</strong> chemical fertilizer. Vermi compost not<br />
only supply nutrient but also improve quantity <strong>of</strong> hormones for plant growth, improves the soil structure leading to increase in water<br />
and nutrient holding capacities <strong>of</strong> soil.<br />
Components <strong>of</strong> A Commercial Unit<br />
Sheds<br />
Shed is necessary as the temperature in summer is high. We can make it by the use <strong>of</strong> concrete pillars because this will act as a<br />
source <strong>of</strong> income for those in the village who produce pillars. It will prevent wetting <strong>of</strong> beds due to rain on a windy day. While designing<br />
the sheds adequate room has to be left around the beds for easy movement <strong>of</strong> the labour attending to fill and harvest the beds.<br />
Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-<strong>11</strong> 137
DWDU, Rajkot<br />
Vermi-beds<br />
Scientific bed size proposed here is 10mt by 1 mt by 0.3 mt. The whole bed area should be above the ground. The bed should have a<br />
uniform height over the entire width to the extent possible to avoid low production owing to low bed volumes. The proper bed width<br />
should not be more that 1.5 m to allow easy access to the centre <strong>of</strong> the bed.<br />
Land<br />
About 750 square meter <strong>of</strong> land is required to set up a vermi compost production unit in each village. It should have at least one<br />
super structure to cover the 40 beds. It should have an arrangement for watering and other equipments as required because<br />
moisture is very essential for compost production. Land can be taken from Gram panchayat on lease <strong>of</strong> at least 10-15 years.<br />
Seed Stock<br />
This is very important thing because worms multiply at the rate <strong>of</strong> 350 worms per m 3 <strong>of</strong> bed space over a period <strong>of</strong> 6 month to<br />
a year.<br />
Fencing<br />
The entire area has to be fenced to prevent the stray animals and other unwanted elements. These could be estimated based on<br />
the length <strong>of</strong> the periphery <strong>of</strong> the farm.<br />
Water Supply System<br />
We have to maintain always 50% moisture content, there is need to plan for a water source, lifting mechanism and a system <strong>of</strong><br />
conveying and applying the water to vermi-beds. Drippers with round the clock flow arrangement would be quite handy for<br />
continuous supply and saving on water. Such a water supply/application system requiring considerable initial investment,<br />
however, reduces the operational costs on hand watering and proves economical in the long run. The cost <strong>of</strong> these items depends<br />
on the capacity <strong>of</strong> the unit and the type <strong>of</strong> water supply chosen.<br />
Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-<strong>11</strong> 138
DWDU, Rajkot<br />
Machinery<br />
Farm machinery and implements are required for cutting the raw material in small pieces, conveying shredded raw material to the<br />
vermi-sheds, loading, unloading, collection <strong>of</strong> compost, loosening <strong>of</strong> beds for aeration, shifting <strong>of</strong> the compost. Costs <strong>of</strong> providing<br />
necessary implements and the machinery have to be included in the project cost.<br />
Table: 42.iv Model <strong>of</strong> a Vermi-compost Unit for 40 beds <strong>of</strong> Dimension (10mt*1mt*0.3mt)<br />
S. No Particulars Quantity Rate (Rs.) Amount (Rs.)<br />
1 Super Structure construction with truss with fencing 128750<br />
2 Shade net for covering the ro<strong>of</strong> 750 sqrt mt. 25 18750<br />
3 Binding wire for tying 200 Kg 50 10000<br />
4 Labour charges for erection <strong>of</strong> sheds 100 100 10000<br />
5 Shovels, spades, crowbars, iron baskets etc 15000<br />
6 Weighing scale (100 kg capacity) 1 2500 2500<br />
7 Cow dung @ 80kg/m3 96 qtl 250 24000<br />
8 Worms 200 kg 70 14000<br />
9 Formation <strong>of</strong> vermin bed with agro-waste, cow dung and worms 50000<br />
10 Miscellaneous - - 3000<br />
<strong>11</strong> Training 5000<br />
12 Total cost - - Rs. 281000<br />
Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-<strong>11</strong> 139
DWDU, Rajkot<br />
Table No-42.v: Returns from vermicomposting<br />
Benefits<br />
1. Sale <strong>of</strong> vermin compost <strong>of</strong> 120 tones @ Rs.3000/- per ton 120*3000=360,000 Rs<br />
2. Sale <strong>of</strong> worms @ 5 kg per ton <strong>of</strong> compost and Rs. 50 per kg 600*50=30,000 Rs<br />
3.Total<br />
3,90,000 Rs/-<br />
Net benefit<br />
1,09,000 Rs/-<br />
Training will be provided to all the stakeholders by KVK and VVK, Rajkot which can be divided in to two categories and shown<br />
below.<br />
A. Theoretical<br />
• Introduction to Organic Farming<br />
• Need and the importance <strong>of</strong> Organic farming<br />
• Introduction to Composting methods<br />
• Vermi-culture<br />
• Earth Worms, nature, identification and selection<br />
• Vermi-castings<br />
• Vermi-compost<br />
• Marketing Avenues<br />
• Application <strong>of</strong> vermicomposting<br />
• Addresses <strong>of</strong> the suppliers <strong>of</strong> worms.<br />
B. Practical<br />
• Production Methods<br />
• Raw Materials<br />
Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-<strong>11</strong> 140
DWDU, Rajkot<br />
• Site and the type <strong>of</strong> Infrastructure<br />
• Tank<br />
• Vermi-bed<br />
• Harvest<br />
• Quality Analysis<br />
• Storage & Packaging<br />
• Dos and Don’ts<br />
Production System – 3: Floriculture<br />
Floriculture industry a lucrative business comprising traditional flowers , cut flowers, pot plants, dry floral crafts and planting<br />
materials, besides value added products like bouquets, garlands, floral baskets, floral concretes, pot-pour and oils. It has proved to<br />
be a highly pr<strong>of</strong>itable agro-business generating maximum returns per unit area. Flowers like Rose, Marigold can be pr<strong>of</strong>itably<br />
cultivated. Rose and marigold fetch very high prices in the local market. This can be a good alternative and economic crop for the<br />
small stakeholders. The package <strong>of</strong> practices for commercial cultivation <strong>of</strong> these crops has been standardized and technology has<br />
been transferred.<br />
a) Marigold<br />
Marigold gained popularity amongst farmer and flower dealers on account <strong>of</strong> its easy culture, wide adaptability, attractive colour,<br />
shape, size and good keeping quality. Marigold is valued loose flower for making garlands. Besides, it is used as trap crop in the<br />
borders to attract insects attacking the main crop. Three weeks old seedlings are planted which grows upto a height <strong>of</strong> 75-90 cm at<br />
maturity with deep orange or lemon yellow flowers. It is propagated through seeds and cuttings. For better growth and<br />
improvement, application <strong>of</strong> NPK @80:40:80kg/ha is recommended. Flowers are plucked when they have attained the full size and<br />
it should be done in cool hours <strong>of</strong> the day either in the evening or morning. Good varieties <strong>of</strong> marigold are Namdhari marigold,<br />
Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-<strong>11</strong> 141
DWDU, Rajkot<br />
First Lady and Pusa Narangi. Pinching <strong>of</strong> terminal leaves was found to significantly increase growth and yield in Pusa Basanti and<br />
Pusa Narangi gaindha. Pusa Narangi is mostly preferred due to higher flower production.<br />
Sowing time<br />
Transplanting<br />
time<br />
Flowering time<br />
Harvesting time<br />
Mid June Mid July Late rain<br />
Mid Sept. Mid October Winter<br />
Jan- Feb. Feb.- March Summer<br />
Input required<br />
Picked once in 3<br />
days; 60 days<br />
after planting<br />
Good quality seedlings, nursery to raise seedlings, manpower, manures and fertilizers.<br />
Table No-42.vii: Economics <strong>of</strong> Marigold cultivation<br />
Economics <strong>of</strong> Marigold cultivation in 1 Hectare<br />
S.No Particulars Expenditure (Rs.) Income<br />
1 Land Preparation 7500 -<br />
2 Seedlings (40000 nos) 20000 -<br />
3 Sowing/watering etc 15000 -<br />
4 Farm Yard Manure 15000 -<br />
5 Application <strong>of</strong> Fertiliser cost 3125<br />
6 Ploughing 7000 -<br />
7 Labour cost for weeding/soil bed 15000 -<br />
8 Plucking <strong>of</strong> flowers 7600<br />
9 Miscellaneous 2000<br />
Total Expenditure: 84625<br />
10 Production (Kg/Ha) Rate/Kg Income (Rs)<br />
<strong>11</strong> 2500 50 125000<br />
12 Net Pr<strong>of</strong>it 40375<br />
Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-<strong>11</strong> 142
DWDU, Rajkot<br />
Activity Flow Chart - Marigold<br />
Climate (20-32 0 C)<br />
Sandy Loam<br />
Propagation<br />
Seed<br />
Stem Cutting<br />
Raising seedlings in open field<br />
Transplanting (1 month old)<br />
Spacing (50Cm × 50Cm)<br />
N:P:K (80:40:80kg/ha) + FYM 15<br />
tonnes/ha<br />
Irrigation (once in 4-5 days during dry period)<br />
Weeding<br />
Pinching after 40 days <strong>of</strong> transplanting<br />
Harvesting<br />
For Local market packed in cloth, poly<br />
bags and basket<br />
Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-<strong>11</strong> 143
DWDU, Rajkot<br />
b) Sunflower<br />
Sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) is an important oilseed crop in India popularly known as “Surajmukhi.” It is one <strong>of</strong> the fastest<br />
growing oilseed crops in India. Sunflower being a short duration and day neutral plant is quite suitable to fit in our existing<br />
cropping system. Sunflower is a major source <strong>of</strong> vegetable oil in the world. It is used for a variety <strong>of</strong> cooking purposes. Sunflower<br />
seed contains about 48 – 53 percent edible oil. It is used as nutritious meal for birds and animals. Sunflower has one <strong>of</strong> the shortest<br />
growing seasons <strong>of</strong> the major cash crops. Plants are drought-resistant and grow well in soils ranging in texture from sand to clay.<br />
Soils should have good drainage for sunflower production.<br />
Like most field crops, sunflower requires the kind <strong>of</strong> good seed-bed which results from carrying out a second ploughing if the field<br />
is planted on a fallow/barren land. By ploughing, only once on already cultivatable land, however, a farmer can reduce his variable<br />
costs <strong>of</strong> production. By and large farmers have now adopted improved methods <strong>of</strong> planting. The crop was initially broadcast done<br />
before sunflower gained popularity from various institutions. Line planting, however, is now dominant with recommended spacing<br />
<strong>of</strong> 75cm by 50cm and 2 seeds per hole. An application <strong>of</strong> P 20 5 fertilizer before planting and 60kg/ha <strong>of</strong> Nitrogen at thinning are<br />
recommended. Lower plant populations are recommended in areas where rainfall is limited (on average 33,000-45,000 plants per<br />
ha in semi-arid areas). However, the highest yields and oil percentages are obtained by planting early. Seed can be planted to a<br />
maximum depth <strong>of</strong> 10cm if necessary to reach moisture.<br />
Sunflower harvesting<br />
Sunflower harvesting, by hand or machine, takes place when the upper leaves have started to dry and the flowers are faded.<br />
In some cases, especially when the fields are small, it is preferable to harvest the crop before maturity. This decreases the risk <strong>of</strong><br />
losses from attacks by birds and other pests.<br />
Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-<strong>11</strong> 144
DWDU, Rajkot<br />
Hand harvesting<br />
Manual harvesting is done by cutting <strong>of</strong>f heads with a knife or clippers.<br />
If, at harvest time, the moisture content <strong>of</strong> the seeds is higher than 15 percent, the heads should be pre-dried before threshing.<br />
Mechanized harvest<br />
Mechanized harvesting <strong>of</strong> sunflowers is generally done with combine harvesters designed for wheat, but modified and equipped<br />
with a sunflower-picker head. The work capacity <strong>of</strong> these machines is about 0.9 h/ha.<br />
Seed Type<br />
Name <strong>of</strong> the hybrids<br />
KBSH-1, Jwalamukhi, Sungene-85, PAC-36, PAC-1091,<br />
MLSFH-47<br />
GAUSUF-15, Morden TNAUSUF-7<br />
Name <strong>of</strong> the varieties<br />
Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-<strong>11</strong> 145
DWDU, Rajkot<br />
Table No-42.viii Technical Details <strong>of</strong> Sunflower Plantation Activities<br />
Particulars<br />
Value<br />
Crop Name<br />
Sunflower<br />
Plant To Plant Spacing 0.50 mt<br />
Row to Row Spacing 0.75 mt<br />
Seed Required 32 Kg Kg<br />
No. or rows 133 No.<br />
Cultivation Area(100 X 100) Mt 10000 Sq. Mt<br />
No. <strong>of</strong> Plants 3000 Nos.<br />
Plantation Area 1.00 Ha.<br />
No. <strong>of</strong> Plants for 1.00 ha 30000 Nos.<br />
Gap Filling 20 %<br />
S. No. Description No. Lengt<br />
h(m.) Width Depth<br />
(m.) (m.)<br />
Unit Quantity Rate Amount<br />
1 Cultivation cost before sowing 100 100 Ha 10000 4850<br />
2 Providing sunflower seeds(Incl. transportation, loading<br />
and unloading<br />
32 Kg 32 225 7200<br />
3 Sowing <strong>of</strong> sunflower seeds 3200<br />
4 Irrigation and other miscalleneous cost 35000<br />
5 Application <strong>of</strong> fertilizers and fugicides, watering, weeding cost and<br />
25000<br />
other treatment etc complete<br />
6 Threshing and collection <strong>of</strong> sunflowers 4500<br />
7 Contigency . 6500<br />
Total 86250<br />
Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-<strong>11</strong> 146
DWDU, Rajkot<br />
Cost Benefit ratio <strong>of</strong> sunflower plantation<br />
Total cost <strong>of</strong> 1 Hactare plantation : Rs.86250<br />
Total benefit obtained from the sunflower plantation :<br />
Total Yield from 1 hactare : 980 Kg<br />
Cost <strong>of</strong> sunflower seeds in the market : Rs. <strong>11</strong>7 per Kg<br />
So, total amount obtained from the sunflower plantation is Rs. <strong>11</strong>5250<br />
So, Net Pr<strong>of</strong>it will be Rs. <strong>11</strong>5250-86250 = Rs.29000 per Hactare<br />
c) Rose Plantation<br />
Commercial Farming <strong>of</strong> Rose in <strong>Gujarat</strong>: The main districts which are having commercial farming <strong>of</strong> rose are Ahmedabad,<br />
Baroda, Anand, Surat, Navsari and Valsad. Nowadays Saurashtra farmers have also been motivated for rose farming through<br />
watershed activities.<br />
Varieties <strong>of</strong> Rose : There are approx. 2000 varieties <strong>of</strong> roses are available. Some <strong>of</strong> them are as under.<br />
1) Miniature (Vaman) Rose : Plants are short, Leaves are small, Planted in buckets(kundas) or around the garden.<br />
Varities in this types are Baby gold star, Pipilov, Scarlet Jem, Nartaki<br />
2) Floribanda : big size flowers, flowers are in bunch.<br />
Varieties :<br />
White : Iceburg, Summer s now, Hemangini<br />
Pink : Queen Elisabeth, Junius miss, Delhi prince, Bon bon, Narmada, Rupal<br />
Orange :Anabel , Flemeko, Zenina, Sunfire, Dipak, Dipika<br />
Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-<strong>11</strong> 147
DWDU, Rajkot<br />
Red : Europeana, Marlena, Zizi, Devdaji, Jantar-mantar<br />
Yellow : Circus, Golden Rain, Mahadev<br />
Lovender : Mahuva, Milambari, Sushma<br />
3) Hybrid-Tee : Most adoptable variety in India, big and attractive flowers.<br />
White : Virgo, Paskali, White masterpiece, Tushar, John <strong>of</strong> Kienedy, Vite van, Garden party<br />
Pink : Confidence, Marita Flash, Michel Miland, Pitar Fenkrenfold, First Prize<br />
Yellow : Garga, Golden giant, Landora, Mubela, Bikaner<br />
Orange : Arizona, Kolit flame, Just Joy, Super Star, Montezuma<br />
Red : Papa Miland, Red master piece, krimson Glory, Red devil, S<strong>of</strong>ia loren, happiness Gladiator<br />
4) Mixd Colour : Criss <strong>of</strong> fire, careless love, Granda,American hemirtes<br />
Poly entha : short plants, long time seed germination<br />
Velia Gulab : like Velas, Varieties : Casino, Koktel delhi white, purl, lemark tempo, Royal gold<br />
Climate: Cold and dry atmosphere is best suited for rose planting. Rose can be planted in hot and moist enviroment also but<br />
requires more scope <strong>of</strong> disease.<br />
Soil: Soil with good drain, fertile and medium black soil is suited to rose planting. It can be sown in sandy soil also, but required<br />
more compost manure.<br />
Sometimes due to poor drain capacity <strong>of</strong> black soil, water logging damages rose plants. By improving soil drain capacity,<br />
rose plants can be sown in heavy black soil also. Rose plants require more sunlight. so it should be sown in place which is open to<br />
sunlight.<br />
Sowing: Digging pits <strong>of</strong> size 60x60x60 c<br />
Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-<strong>11</strong> 148
DWDU, Rajkot<br />
m in size and it should be open to sunlight upto 10 to 15 days. In the dig soil 6 to 8 kg cow dung manure should be mixed.<br />
Moreover, 50gm Urea, 100 Gram super phosphate and 50 gram Murate <strong>of</strong> potash should be mixed. If fungi is there, 3 to 5 gm BHC<br />
should also be mixed.<br />
Time <strong>of</strong> sowing: Roses can be sown throughout the year. But it should not be sown in heavy rainfall season like July-August and<br />
also not in April-May.<br />
Table No-42.ix: Economic <strong>of</strong> Rose cultivation in 1 Hectare<br />
Economic <strong>of</strong> Rose cultivation in 1 Hectare<br />
S.No Particulars Expenditure (Rs.) Income<br />
1 Land Preparation 7500<br />
2 Seedlings (5000 nos), Rs. 6 per plant 30000 -<br />
3 Sowing/watering etc 12500 -<br />
4 Farm Yard Manure 12000 -<br />
5 Application <strong>of</strong> Fertiliser cost 2800<br />
6 Ploughing 7000 -<br />
7 Labour cost for weeding/soil bed 18000 -<br />
8 Plucking <strong>of</strong> flowers(Considering 58 Mandays) 8900<br />
9 Miscellaneous 2000<br />
Total Expenditure: 100700<br />
10 Production (Kg/Ha) Rate Income<br />
<strong>11</strong> 1250 120 150000<br />
Net Pr<strong>of</strong>it : 49300<br />
Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-<strong>11</strong> 149
DWDU, Rajkot<br />
Production system -4 Agricultural Implements<br />
1. Introduction<br />
The agricultural implements cover ploughs, threshers, axes, powrahs, chaffcutter machine, cultivators, seed drills, etc. These<br />
implements are used for agriculture work to improve the efficiency and reduce the labour. A large variety <strong>of</strong> agricultural<br />
implements are also used as attachments to tractors. Cultivators and other implements should be manufactured either as per the<br />
design available in the market or the designs developed or recommended by agricultural institutions/universities <strong>of</strong> the region.<br />
Sr. No. Name <strong>of</strong> Implement Cost (Rs.) Rent(Rs./Day)<br />
1 Spray Pump(Simple) 3500.00 100.00<br />
2 Spray Pump(Automatic) 5000.00 200.00<br />
3 Spray Pump (Tractor Operated) 12000.00 300.00<br />
4 Chaff cutter 40000.00 -<br />
4 Rotavator <strong>11</strong>0000.00 2500.00<br />
5 Cultivator 40000.00 1000.00<br />
6 Automatic Seed Drill 60000.00 1500.00<br />
7 Rotary shredder 130000.00 5000.00<br />
8 Thresher 175000.00 2000.00<br />
9 Harvesting Machine 75000.00 1500.00<br />
10 Cotton uprooting instrument 29500.00 20.00<br />
<strong>11</strong> Strives 20000.00 -<br />
700000.00 14120.00<br />
This Machinery can be provided to a group which can maintain by the members<br />
Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-<strong>11</strong> 150
DWDU, Rajkot<br />
Cost <strong>of</strong> Implements(Initial Capital) : Rs. 700000.00<br />
(A) Considering 5% Depreciation Per Year : Rs. 35000.00<br />
(B) Considering 10% Maintenance cost Per Year : Rs.70000.00<br />
(A+B) Rs. 105000.00<br />
Net Income per Annum: Rs. 423000.00<br />
(Considering 5 times in a season and considering 3 seasons in a year)<br />
Net pr<strong>of</strong>it per year: Rs. 318600.00<br />
Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-<strong>11</strong> 151
DWDU, Rajkot<br />
Table no.43.1: Details <strong>of</strong> activities in the CPRs in the project areas<br />
S. No.<br />
Target<br />
Name(s) <strong>of</strong> the<br />
villages<br />
CPR particulars Activity proposed Target area under the<br />
activity (ha)<br />
Estimated expenditure<br />
(Rs.)<br />
Expected no. <strong>of</strong><br />
beneficiaries<br />
Kanpar<br />
Juna Pipaliya<br />
Jivapar<br />
Dolatpar<br />
Sanathali<br />
Waste land Fodder 8.5 1.90 45<br />
Community<br />
Pasture land<br />
Plantation 0.25 0.12 15<br />
Waste land Jatropha 1 0.34 12<br />
Waste land<br />
Grassland/Gauchar<br />
development<br />
2 0.60 35<br />
Community<br />
Pasture land<br />
Fodder 5 1.91 42<br />
Waste land Jatropha 2 0.65 15<br />
Waste land Afforestation 0.5 0.55 22<br />
Waste land Fodder 7.6 1.35 28<br />
Waste land Jatropha 2 0.65 12<br />
Community<br />
Pasture land<br />
Fodder Plot 5.4 1.52 35<br />
Community<br />
Pasture land<br />
Fodder Plot 5.4 1.52 48<br />
Waste land Jatropha 4 1.3 15<br />
Waste<br />
land/Pasture<br />
Fodder 6.8 1.35 35<br />
Cultivable waste<br />
land<br />
Afforestation 0.5 0.55 16<br />
Waste land Afforestation 0.5 0.55 22<br />
Waste land Fodder/Phoenix 7.6 1.35 28<br />
Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-<strong>11</strong> 152
DWDU, Rajkot<br />
Waste land Jatropha 2 0.65 12<br />
Community<br />
Pasture land<br />
4.4 Capacity building and Institutional collaboration<br />
Fodder Plot 5.4 1.52 35<br />
Watershed management and development requires the collaboration <strong>of</strong> a wide range <strong>of</strong> farmers’ organizations as well as<br />
extension and research institutions at various levels. This gives implementers access a wider technical resource base, creates<br />
better information flows and encourages mutual learning. Watersheds serve as a confluence between lands and communities,<br />
providing ample opportunities for members to share complementary expertise. A watershed contains producers (farmers),<br />
possibly actors that add value to produce, traders and consumers information, and education institutions to test their joint efforts<br />
to make a difference. Watersheds can be also a good ground for learning and demonstration <strong>of</strong> expertise.<br />
Scope <strong>of</strong> capacity building at Project Villages<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
Income Generation Activities<br />
o Stiching<br />
o Food Processing<br />
o Post Harvest management practices Fodder development and Management<br />
Crop Information<br />
Meteorological Information<br />
Alternative Land Use Plan<br />
Improved and Scientific agriculture practices<br />
Scientific planning <strong>of</strong> Soil and Moisture conservation<br />
Information dissemination on Audio/Video<br />
Dairy <strong>Development</strong> and Management<br />
Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-<strong>11</strong> 153
DWDU, Rajkot<br />
Table no. 44: Institutes Identified for Capacity Building<br />
S.No Organisation Training Modules<br />
1 Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Targharia, Rajkot Training in modern and scientific agriculture practices<br />
2 Farmers training center, Rajkot Better agriculture practices and Organic farming to<br />
UGs.<br />
3 Junagarh Agril. University, Junagarh Training in modern and better agriculture practices<br />
4 CSWCRTI, Vasad,Anand SMC works, New Innovative techniques in SMC works<br />
5 Udyog Bharti, Gondal, Rajkot Microenterprise development activities<br />
6 District industrial center, Rajkot Mechanical training and support training to<br />
stakeholders<br />
7 SIRD, Ahmedabad Participatory approach and Engineering aspects in<br />
watershed<br />
8 BISAG Space application and Different maps preparation<br />
Early and ongoing stakeholder collaboration and communication in capacity building is also important from the point viewpoint <strong>of</strong><br />
“leveling the playing field” in anticipation <strong>of</strong> disputes that may arise. Filling strategic skills/capacity gaps supports Integrated<br />
Water resources Management, facilitates dispute resolution, and builds practical understanding <strong>of</strong> the scope <strong>of</strong> sustainable natural<br />
resource development challenges and opportunities.<br />
Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-<strong>11</strong> 154
DWDU, Rajkot<br />
Table no. 45: Capacity Building plan<br />
S. No. Village Project Stakeholders<br />
Total no. <strong>of</strong> No. <strong>of</strong> persons to be No. <strong>of</strong> training<br />
persons<br />
trained<br />
programmes<br />
Estimated cost<br />
PIA 5 5 25 135000<br />
WDTs 5 5 20 120500<br />
1 <strong>IWMP</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />
UGs 375 375 10 265000<br />
SHGs 1220 1220 15 332000<br />
WCs 60 60 35 360000<br />
GPs 22 22 8 70000<br />
Table no.46: Information, Education and Communication Activities<br />
S. No. Activity Executing agency<br />
Estimated expenditure<br />
(Rs.)<br />
1 Street plays Local drama group 1.526<br />
Wall paintings/ Focussed DWDU, Rajkot<br />
2 Group discussion/Slogan<br />
1.526<br />
writing<br />
3 Pamphlets and posters DWDU, Rajkot 1.908<br />
Banners and<br />
DWDU, Rajkot<br />
4<br />
hoardings/Entry<br />
1.145<br />
board/Information board<br />
Total: 7.63<br />
Outcome<br />
Awareness generation and<br />
making beneficiaries<br />
accountable for sustainable<br />
development<br />
Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-<strong>11</strong> 155
DWDU, Rajkot<br />
CHAPTER - 5<br />
BUDGETING<br />
Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-<strong>11</strong> 156
DWDU, Rajkot<br />
Budgeting<br />
Table no. 47: Budget at a glance<br />
Budget Component % <strong>of</strong> the Budget Rs in Lacs<br />
Net Project Cost 100 898.05<br />
-Administrative Costs 10 89.805<br />
-Monitoring 1 8.9805<br />
-Evaluation 1 8.9805<br />
Preparatory phase:<br />
-Entry point activities 4 35.922<br />
-Institution and capacity building 5<br />
44.9025<br />
-Detailed Project Report (DPR) 1 8.9805<br />
Watershed Works Phase:<br />
-Watershed <strong>Development</strong> works, 50 449.025<br />
-Livelihood activities for the asset less persons, 10<br />
89.805<br />
-Production system and micro enterprises 13 <strong>11</strong>6.747<br />
Consolidation Phase 5 44.9025<br />
Total 100 898.05<br />
Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-<strong>11</strong> 157
DWDU, Rajkot<br />
Table no. 48: Village wise- component wise budget available under <strong>IWMP</strong><br />
Sl<br />
no<br />
Village<br />
EPA<br />
Institution<br />
and CB<br />
DPR<br />
Watershed<br />
development<br />
Work<br />
Activity<br />
Livelihood<br />
for asset<br />
less<br />
Production<br />
system and<br />
Microenterprises<br />
Consolidation<br />
1 Kanpar<br />
6.5202 8.15025 1.63005 91.282 14.670 16.300 4.89 143.44<br />
2 Juna<br />
Pipaliya<br />
3<br />
Jivapar<br />
4<br />
5<br />
Dolatpar<br />
Santhali<br />
4.551 5.68875 1.13775 63.714 10.2398 <strong>11</strong>.3775 3.41325 100.122<br />
6.1386 7.67325 1.53465 85.9404 13.8<strong>11</strong>9 15.3465 4.60395 135.04<br />
1.821 2.27625 0.45525 25.494 4.09725 4.5525 1.36575 40.06<br />
16.8912 21.<strong>11</strong>4 4.2228 236.4768 38.0052 42.228 12.6684 371.60<br />
Total 35.922 44.9025 8.9805 502.9072 80.82415 89.8045 26.94135 790.262<br />
Table no. 49: Village wise gap in funds requirement<br />
Sl No Village Total cost requirement Total funds<br />
available under<br />
<strong>IWMP</strong><br />
1 Kanpar 163.01 163.01 -<br />
2 Juna Pipaliya <strong>11</strong>4.28 <strong>11</strong>3.78 0.5<br />
3 Jivapar 153.47 153.47 -<br />
4 Dolatpar 46.53 45.53 1.00<br />
5 Santhali 422.28 422.28 -<br />
Total 899.55 898.05 1.5<br />
Gap in funds<br />
requirement<br />
Total<br />
Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-<strong>11</strong> 158
DWDU, Rajkot<br />
Table no.50: Details <strong>of</strong> Convergence <strong>of</strong> <strong>IWMP</strong> with other Schemes<br />
S. No. Village Phase/ Type <strong>of</strong> work<br />
1<br />
Juna Pipaliya<br />
Activity to be carried<br />
out<br />
Fund made<br />
available to<br />
<strong>IWMP</strong> due to<br />
convergence<br />
(Rs. in lakh)<br />
Reference no. <strong>of</strong><br />
activity/ task/<br />
structure in DPR<br />
Level at<br />
which<br />
decision for<br />
convergence<br />
was taken<br />
Works Farm bunding 0.50 MGNREGA Dist level<br />
2 Dolatpar Works Farm bunding 1.00 MGNREGA Dist level<br />
Total for cluster 1.50<br />
Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-<strong>11</strong> 159
DWDU, Rajkot<br />
Table no. 51: Public-Private Partnership in the <strong>IWMP</strong> projects<br />
S.<br />
No.<br />
Name <strong>of</strong><br />
Private<br />
Sector<br />
Partner<br />
Agency<br />
Type <strong>of</strong> agreement signed<br />
c) Any other<br />
a)MoU b)Contract<br />
(pl. specify)<br />
Financial<br />
contribution<br />
Private<br />
<strong>IWMP</strong><br />
sector<br />
Partnership<br />
Interventions<br />
Expected<br />
Outcomes<br />
Comments<br />
Not Available<br />
Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-<strong>11</strong> 160
DWDU, Rajkot<br />
CHAPTER - 6<br />
EXPECTED OUTCOMES<br />
Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-<strong>11</strong> 161
DWDU, Rajkot<br />
6.1 Expected Outcomes<br />
6.1.1 Environmental Benefits: As demand for groundwater has gone up, rapid urbanization and land use changes have decreased<br />
drastically the already low infiltration rates <strong>of</strong> rainfall into the soil and have diminished the natural recharging <strong>of</strong> aquifers. The ground<br />
water table thus has depleted over the years. Substantial opportunities exist for groundwater recharge and water harvesting to<br />
supplement water supplies in the Kanpar, Junapiplya, Jivapar, Dolatpar and Sanathali village. In order to improve the ground water<br />
situation it is necessary to artificially recharge the depleted ground water aquifers. The available techniques are easy, cost-effective<br />
and sustainable in the long term. Many <strong>of</strong> these can be adopted by the individuals and village communities with locally available<br />
materials and manpower. Proper water harvesting structures and percolation-tanks will be constructed to increase ground water<br />
table from 15-18 mt to 12-15 mt in the post project period. Tree cover in the cluster villages is very less. The village has a forest area <strong>of</strong><br />
100.2 ha in the cluster area which consists <strong>of</strong> only Juliflora Prosopis (ganda babool) and other forest trees. Trees like Neem, Sitaphal and<br />
Lemon are seen on few farm boundaries. It is planned that 60.76 ha land to be covered under new plantation in both villages.<br />
Table no.52: Environmental Benefits<br />
Sr.<br />
No. Village<br />
Soil loss<br />
(Tonnes/ha/yr)<br />
Water storage<br />
(Cumec) Ground water table (mt) Tree cover<br />
Preproject<br />
Expected<br />
postproject<br />
Preproject<br />
Expected<br />
postproject<br />
Open<br />
well:<br />
preproject<br />
Open<br />
well:<br />
postproject<br />
Bore<br />
well:<br />
preproject<br />
Bore<br />
well:<br />
postproject<br />
Area<br />
in Ha.:<br />
preproject<br />
Area<br />
in Ha.:<br />
postproject<br />
Tree<br />
count:<br />
preproject<br />
1 Kanpar<br />
Juna<br />
2 Pipaliya<br />
3 Jivapar<br />
4 Dolatpar<br />
5 Sanathali 2478.27 991.40<br />
6.1.2: Drinking water<br />
384000<br />
10005400<br />
15-18<br />
12-15<br />
40-50 35-45 45 126.76<br />
Tree<br />
count:<br />
postproject<br />
16105 50704<br />
Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-<strong>11</strong> 162
DWDU, Rajkot<br />
The five villages in the project area totally depend upon Narmada water supply for drinking and other domestic activities.<br />
WASMO/Sector reform has constructed tanks to store water in all the villages. As a result <strong>of</strong> the watershed activities, it is expected that<br />
the quantity and quality <strong>of</strong> drinking water would improve and will be available to villagers from well constructed downstream <strong>of</strong> check<br />
dams.<br />
Table no. 53: Status <strong>of</strong> Drinking water<br />
Sl. No.<br />
Names <strong>of</strong><br />
Villages<br />
Availability <strong>of</strong> drinking water (no. <strong>of</strong> months in a year)<br />
Quality <strong>of</strong> drinking water<br />
Pre-project Expected Post project Pre-project Expected Post-project<br />
Comments<br />
1 Kanpar Narmada Pipe line Water available from Well,<br />
Check dams, PT and Narmda<br />
Pipe line<br />
2 Juna Pipaliya Narmada and Panchayat<br />
Well<br />
3 Jivapar Narmada and<br />
Well/Borewell<br />
4 Dolatpar Narmada and Panchayat<br />
Well<br />
5 Sanathali Narmada and Panchayat<br />
Well<br />
Water available from Well,<br />
Check dams, PT, Bore Well<br />
and then Narmda Pipe line<br />
Water available from Well,<br />
Check dams, PT, Bore Well<br />
Water available from Well,<br />
Check dams, PT, Bore Well<br />
Water available from Well,<br />
Ro<strong>of</strong> water harvesting and<br />
Bore Well<br />
Potable Potable<br />
Potable Potable<br />
Potable Potable<br />
Potable Potable<br />
Potable Potable<br />
Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-<strong>11</strong> 163
DWDU, Rajkot<br />
6.1. 3: Crops<br />
Due to additional availability <strong>of</strong> water in new structures, farmers will be able to grow vegetable crops during non rainy<br />
seasons. Even after taking rainy season and post rainy season crops into consideration, they will get a good price for vegetables<br />
in summer also. Mostly farmers with large families will prefer to grow vegetables, as the crops need timely availability <strong>of</strong><br />
human labor to harvest and encash the market potential. The planned earthen bunds and salinity reducing trenches would<br />
partially prevent the saline water from the sea to mix with the sweet rain water and also help to percolate water underground,<br />
and preserve some moisture in the soil. Also the proposed soil and water conservation activities will bring more areas under<br />
cultivation. New agricultural practices, new technology, organic farming etc will be demonstrated in the villages. This will help<br />
in additional area coming under cultivation and increasing productivity too. The farmers can take more than one season <strong>of</strong><br />
crops. Different varieties <strong>of</strong> crops can be taken.<br />
Table no. 54: Details <strong>of</strong> crop area and yield in the project areas<br />
Name <strong>of</strong> village<br />
Kanpar<br />
Juna Pipaliya<br />
Jivapar<br />
Dolatpar<br />
Name <strong>of</strong> crops<br />
Pre-project<br />
Expected Post-project<br />
Khariff Area (ha) Average Yield (Qtl) per ha. Area (ha) Average Yield per<br />
ha<br />
Cotton 4846.08 14.22 5330.688 15.87<br />
Groundnut 1838 <strong>11</strong>.89 2003.42 12.96<br />
Pulses 572.14 9.30 600.747 <strong>11</strong>.50<br />
Kanpar<br />
Juna Pipaliya<br />
Jivapar<br />
Dolatpar<br />
Santhali<br />
Rabi<br />
Wheat 3594.7 21.08 4493.375 24.80<br />
Jiru 884.8 9.44 973.28 <strong>11</strong>.35<br />
Garlic/Fodder 353 34.18 370.65 36.25<br />
Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-<strong>11</strong> 164
DWDU, Rajkot<br />
Table no. 55: Area under horticulture/Other crops<br />
S.No. Name <strong>of</strong> Village Existing area under horticulture (Ha) Area under horticulture proposed to be<br />
covered through <strong>IWMP</strong>(Ha)<br />
1 Kanpar 4.5 13.5<br />
2 Junapiplya 6.35 16.5<br />
3 Jivapar <strong>11</strong>.25 16.5<br />
4 Dolatpar 6.75 -<br />
5 Sanathali 12.5 104<br />
Total 41.35 150.5<br />
6.1.4 Livestock<br />
The village has quite a good <strong>of</strong> livestock population. These include cows, bullocks, buffaloes, goats, sheep. The interventions like<br />
provision <strong>of</strong> good quality cows and buffaloes, the establishment <strong>of</strong> a fodder bank and other such related activities would spur up the<br />
dairy development in the village. It is expected that the post project period would see a substantial increase in livestock population<br />
and yield from them.<br />
Table no. 56: Details <strong>of</strong> livestock in the project areas (for fluids please mention in litres, solids in kg and income in Rs.)<br />
S.No. Name <strong>of</strong> Village Type <strong>of</strong> Animal<br />
Pre-Project<br />
Expected Post-project<br />
1 Kanpar<br />
Juna Pipaliya<br />
Jivapar<br />
Dolatpar<br />
Santhali<br />
No Yield Income No. Yield Income<br />
Milch-animals<br />
Cow (per animal/day) 901 3.5 52 1261 5 105<br />
Buffalo(per animal/day) 1558 6.25 187.5 2181 3.5 219<br />
Goat(Meat:Rs/kg) 643 8 220 900 10 270<br />
Sheep(Meat:Rs/kg) 719 6 140 1007 7.15 160<br />
Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-<strong>11</strong> 165
DWDU, Rajkot<br />
6.1.5 Employment<br />
This programme also aims simultaneously to improve the living conditions <strong>of</strong> the abuttant user communities. Employment<br />
opportunities will be created to the people living in the watershed through different soil and water conservation activities and<br />
livelihood activities. Self employment would be created by providing the people with cash support in the form <strong>of</strong> direct livelihood<br />
activities like agriculture, animal husbandry and micro-enterprise development.<br />
Table no. 57: Employment in Project area<br />
s. Names <strong>of</strong><br />
Wage employment Employment Self employment<br />
NO. Villages<br />
No. <strong>of</strong> mandays No. <strong>of</strong> beneficiaries No. <strong>of</strong> beneficiaries<br />
SC ST Others Women Total SC ST Others Women Total SC ST Others Women Total<br />
1<br />
Kanpar 9550 0 54672 32000 289 0 1678 972<br />
40 192 <strong>11</strong>6<br />
2939<br />
348<br />
2 Junapiplya 3230 0 40034 23120 96222 <strong>11</strong>4 0 1483 812 2409 13 175 97 285<br />
3 Jivapar 5075 0 54165 30319 66384 190 0 2044 <strong>11</strong>35 3369 22 240 136 398<br />
4 Dolatpar 1505 0 16472 8900 89559 91 0 955 562 1608 10 <strong>11</strong>4 67 191<br />
Sanathali 14474 0 154437 85000 26877 506 0 3010 5399 8915 61 648 361 1070<br />
5 Total 33834 0 319780 179339 532953 <strong>11</strong>90 0 9170 8880 19240 146 0 1369 777 2292<br />
6.1.6 Migration<br />
WSD can open up new opportunities for households to both intensify and extensify production, for example through:<br />
• Increasing the frequency <strong>of</strong> cultivation – new water harvesting structures <strong>of</strong>ten permits cultivation <strong>of</strong> a second crop, or ‘lifesaving’<br />
irrigation <strong>of</strong> a main crop.<br />
• Adopting new technologies, such as improved varieties <strong>of</strong> staple crops, higher levels <strong>of</strong> input use and higher yields; shifts to the<br />
cultivation <strong>of</strong> higher value crops in the project areas expected.<br />
• Expansion <strong>of</strong> cultivated areas – soil and water conservation interventions can bring new land into production.<br />
Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-<strong>11</strong> 166
DWDU, Rajkot<br />
All <strong>of</strong> the above tend to generate increased demands for labour. These may be provided initially from farm family sources and<br />
subsequently by hired labour. Employment opportunities in the local area as mentioned above will ensure lessening seasonal<br />
migration from the area.<br />
Table no. 58: Details <strong>of</strong> seasonal migration from Project area<br />
SI. No. Names <strong>of</strong> villages No. <strong>of</strong> persons migrating No. <strong>of</strong> days per year <strong>of</strong><br />
migration<br />
Pre-project Expected post project Pre-project Expected post<br />
1 Kanpar 58 32 > 90-120 60<br />
2. Junapiplya 35 13 > 90-120 60<br />
3 Jivapar 109 46 > 90-120 55<br />
4 Dolatpar 49 18 > 90-120 60<br />
5 Sanathali 182 64 > 90-120 50<br />
Table no.59: Per capita Income<br />
Sr. No. Village Source <strong>of</strong> Income Pre-project Expected post project<br />
1<br />
Kanpar<br />
Junapiplya<br />
Jivapar<br />
Dolatpar<br />
Sanathali<br />
Agriculture 254308928 53404874.88<br />
Forestry NA NA<br />
Animal Husbandry 15523210 18317387.8<br />
Casual Labour 27692700 14495301<br />
Services/Handicrafts/Business 10721750 13402187.58<br />
Total 43215910 71722263<br />
Linkages<br />
The direct livelihood activities need good forward and backward support. Without such support system the activities may fail to deliver<br />
the desired results. These linkages would involve credit, machinery, input supply, marketing, etc.<br />
Table no. 60: Backward-Forward linkages<br />
Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-<strong>11</strong> 167
DWDU, Rajkot<br />
S. No. Project Type <strong>of</strong> Marketing Facility Pre-project During the project (no.) Post-project (no.)<br />
1 <strong>IWMP</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />
Backward linkages<br />
Seed certification<br />
Seed supply system 1 1<br />
Fertilizer supply system 1 2<br />
Pesticide supply system<br />
Credit institutions - Bank-1 Bank-2<br />
Water supply SSNL Well/Tube well Well/Tube well<br />
Extension services KVK/ Govt Org KVK/Govt Org.<br />
Nurseries -<br />
Kits/Tools/Machinery suppliers -<br />
Price Support system<br />
Labour<br />
Any other (please specify)<br />
Forward linkages<br />
Harvesting/threshing machinery<br />
Storage (including cold storage)<br />
Transport facilities<br />
Markets / Mandis<br />
Agro and other Industries<br />
Milk and other collection centres 6<br />
Labour<br />
Any other (please specify)<br />
Collective marketing<br />
system<br />
Collective marketing<br />
system<br />
Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-<strong>11</strong> 168
DWDU, Rajkot<br />
Logical Framework Analysis<br />
Narrative Summary Indicators Source <strong>of</strong> verification Assumptions<br />
Goal:<br />
Sustainable <strong>Development</strong> and<br />
conservation <strong>of</strong> natural resources<br />
with the help <strong>of</strong> Peoples<br />
Participation<br />
Objective 1<br />
Increased Agricultural<br />
Production and overall<br />
development<br />
Increase in contribution <strong>of</strong><br />
agricultural income to the<br />
household income<br />
Increase soil moisture content 1.1 Less Uncertainty in<br />
Output<br />
Soil moisture content will increase<br />
Activities<br />
1.1 Farm bunding<br />
1-2 Crop demonstration/rotation<br />
Agricultural Production<br />
1.2 Farmers take two<br />
crops in a year<br />
1.1 Clear growth <strong>of</strong> vegetation<br />
cover<br />
1.2 Certainty in Khariff ,Rabi crop<br />
1.1 397.37 Ha- Rs 61.25<br />
1.2 9.50 Ha Rs 8.09<br />
1.1 Discussion with<br />
Villagers/Farmers<br />
1.2 Soil testing<br />
1.3 Physical verification<br />
Discussion with<br />
Villagers/Farmers<br />
1.1 Physical verificatiSon<br />
1.2 Records in asset<br />
Repair and Maintenance and<br />
taking care <strong>of</strong> conservation<br />
structures<br />
Time to time take care <strong>of</strong><br />
structures<br />
1.1 Money spent on right<br />
time<br />
Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-<strong>11</strong> 169
DWDU, Rajkot<br />
1-3 Organic farming/Mulching 1.3 8.50 Ha Rs 7.62 register<br />
1.3 Interferences from GIS<br />
maps at different times<br />
1.4 Measurement Book<br />
1.2 Proper scientific<br />
methods used<br />
1-3 Workers are ready<br />
1.4 Fields are free from<br />
crops<br />
Objective 2<br />
Increase irrigation potential<br />
2.1 Increased irrigated area<br />
2.2 Increase in Land value<br />
2.3 More uncultivable lands to be<br />
brought under agriculture and<br />
2.1 Revenue records<br />
2.2 Patwari map<br />
2.3 Maps from GIS<br />
2.1 Judicious use <strong>of</strong> water<br />
2.2 Accessibility to common<br />
and forest lands increased<br />
with removal <strong>of</strong><br />
new plantations<br />
encroachments and<br />
resolution <strong>of</strong> conflicts.<br />
Output<br />
Increased irrigation water<br />
2.1 Increased water table in wells<br />
2.1 Physical verification<br />
2.2 Structures full to its<br />
2.2 Increase in flow period <strong>of</strong><br />
2.2 Records in asset<br />
capacity<br />
streams<br />
register<br />
2.3 Good amount <strong>of</strong> rainfall<br />
2.3 Interferences from GIS<br />
received<br />
maps at different times<br />
2.4 Promotion <strong>of</strong> better<br />
Irrigation practices like<br />
Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-<strong>11</strong> 170
DWDU, Rajkot<br />
Activities<br />
2.1 Nalla/Gully plug<br />
2.2 Percolation tank<br />
2.3 Farm ponds<br />
2.4 Repair <strong>of</strong> old Check dams<br />
2.5 Check dams<br />
Objective 3<br />
To improve Soil Quality<br />
2-1 21 Nos.<br />
2.2 14 Nos<br />
2.3 57Nos<br />
2.4 26 nos<br />
2.5 95 nos<br />
3.1 Agriculture based livelihood<br />
income generation activities<br />
3.2 Promotion <strong>of</strong> organic farming<br />
Practices<br />
drip irrigation<br />
2.1 Physical verification 2.1 Good amount <strong>of</strong> rainfall<br />
2.2 Records in asset 2.1 Size according to<br />
register<br />
catchment and storage<br />
2.3 Interferences from GIS volume calculation<br />
maps at different times 2.3 No seepage from<br />
structure<br />
3.1 Physical verification 3.1 Availability <strong>of</strong><br />
waste/mulching material<br />
Output<br />
Quality <strong>of</strong> Soil improved<br />
3.1 Agriculture production will<br />
Increase<br />
3.2 Plantation <strong>of</strong> fruits and forest<br />
species<br />
3.1 Physical verification<br />
3.2 Market Survey<br />
3.3 Soil testing<br />
3.1 Composting material<br />
used and refilled according<br />
to farm requirement<br />
3.2 Use it in right time<br />
Activities<br />
3.1 Composting 3.1 51 Nos. Physical verification 3.1 People ready for<br />
Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-<strong>11</strong> 171
DWDU, Rajkot<br />
3.2 Application <strong>of</strong> Farm yard<br />
3.2 2.1 lakh<br />
voluntary contribution for<br />
manure<br />
3.3 1.25 lakh<br />
Biogas Structure<br />
3.3 Use <strong>of</strong> FYM enriched with Route<br />
3.2 Available <strong>of</strong> cow dung at<br />
Phosphate and Bio-Fertilizers<br />
right time<br />
3.3 Proper maintenance <strong>of</strong><br />
structures<br />
Objective 4<br />
To increase fodder availability<br />
4.1 Increase in the proportion <strong>of</strong><br />
4.1 Survey(Pre and<br />
4.1 Quality <strong>of</strong> management<br />
households having more security<br />
Post)<br />
<strong>of</strong> common property<br />
<strong>of</strong> fodder<br />
resources<br />
4.2 Reduction in drudgery <strong>of</strong><br />
4.2 Proper distribution <strong>of</strong><br />
fodder<br />
seedling and take care.<br />
collection especially women<br />
Out put<br />
Increased fodder availability<br />
4.1 Health <strong>of</strong> live stock improved<br />
4.1 Expenditure on<br />
4.1 Proper seedling<br />
4.2 Expected increase in cattle<br />
seedling from register<br />
4.2 Proper care and<br />
population<br />
4.2 List <strong>of</strong> beneficiaries<br />
maintenance<br />
4.3 promotion <strong>of</strong> dairy<br />
from the register<br />
development among<br />
communities<br />
Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-<strong>11</strong> 172
DWDU, Rajkot<br />
Activities<br />
4.1 Pasture land and grassland will<br />
4.1 Rs. 9.87 Spent on fodder<br />
4.1 WC's Reports<br />
4.1 Peoples participating<br />
be developed.<br />
4.2 Verification on farm bunds<br />
4.2 Expenditure<br />
4.2 Proper variety Selection<br />
4.2 On farm bunds selected local<br />
Register<br />
4.3 Social fencing<br />
species and fodder crops<br />
4.3 Resolution in WC's<br />
4.4 Physical<br />
verification<br />
Objective 5<br />
5.1 People's participation/women's<br />
5.1 Women participation<br />
Project to be implemented<br />
socio-political and economic<br />
enhanced in decision-making <strong>of</strong><br />
and managed in a<br />
empowerment in watershed for<br />
GVCs.<br />
democratic and<br />
income generation activities<br />
participatory way ensuring<br />
equity.<br />
Output<br />
5.1 Maintenance <strong>of</strong> assets and<br />
5.1 Frequent meetings<br />
5.1 Proper training<br />
5.1 Community Mobilised<br />
records by the villagers<br />
5.2 Training register<br />
provided<br />
5.2 Community Trained<br />
themselves.<br />
5.3 Increased<br />
5.2 No biasness in villages<br />
5.3 Better standard <strong>of</strong> living<br />
participation<br />
Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-<strong>11</strong> 173
DWDU, Rajkot<br />
Activities<br />
5.1 Formation and strengthening <strong>of</strong><br />
5.1 Increased awareness amongst<br />
5.1 Farmable socio-<br />
5.1 No influence <strong>of</strong> any<br />
village institutions like women's SHG<br />
groups/WC/UGs and WCs through<br />
awareness programmes<br />
5.2 Formation <strong>of</strong> fodder banks to<br />
increase fodder security and promote<br />
dung development<br />
5.3 Capapcity building <strong>of</strong> SHG leaders<br />
and accounts members<br />
/farmers/UGs/WCs through<br />
workshop/meetings<br />
5.4 Income generation activities.<br />
women about village resources.<br />
5.2 Women participation<br />
enhanced in decision-making <strong>of</strong><br />
GVCs.<br />
5.3 Farmers adopt organic<br />
farming practices<br />
5.4 Increased household income<br />
5.5 Improved access to credit to<br />
livelihood purposes.<br />
5.6 Gender sensitization <strong>of</strong> UGs<br />
cultural conditions at the<br />
village<br />
5.2 Checking registers <strong>of</strong><br />
SHGs<br />
5.3 Checking passbook <strong>of</strong><br />
groups<br />
5.4 Physical verification <strong>of</strong><br />
income generation<br />
activities<br />
5.5Posters/banners/meeti<br />
external agency<br />
5.2 Smooth flow <strong>of</strong> funds<br />
5.3 Access to appropriate<br />
technology<br />
5.4 People's Participation<br />
and<br />
positive perception<br />
towards the programme<br />
5.5 Awareness campaign<br />
and WCs to increase<br />
ng register<br />
inclusiveness <strong>of</strong> group decision<br />
making.<br />
Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-<strong>11</strong> 174
DWDU, Rajkot<br />
CHAPTER - 7<br />
QUALITY AND SUSTAINABILITY ISSUES<br />
Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-<strong>11</strong> 175
DWDU, Rajkot<br />
Plans for Monitoring and Evaluation<br />
Quality and Sustainability Issues<br />
A Web-based CIS System is being developed for monitoring and evaluating the project in its planning & implementation<br />
phases. The system would be available on a public domain and can be accessed by all the stakeholders <strong>of</strong> the project. The<br />
system shows the entire state <strong>of</strong> <strong>Gujarat</strong> and all <strong>of</strong> those areas selected over the next 18 years. Filtering allows the user to<br />
zoom onto one particular project. Details related to soil type, Land-use classification, inhabitation etc., can be obtained villagewise.<br />
Furthermore, survey-number wise details related to ownership, irrigation source, yield etc., can also be accessed by the users<br />
<strong>of</strong> the system. This system is being used for pooling up the details obtained from the DPR. In other words, the DPR is made available<br />
online in the form <strong>of</strong> a database which will help the stakeholders know areas <strong>of</strong> importance viz., already treated areas/historical<br />
works in the area, proposed areas for treatment etc., for further treatment and planning. The system would also show the satellite<br />
imageries <strong>of</strong> various years from the project inception stage to the project closing stages. This allows the user to evaluate the<br />
effectiveness <strong>of</strong> the treatment and thereby plan corrective measures for the project area. The system would serve as an aiding<br />
tool to the planners and evaluators for judging the efficacy <strong>of</strong> the project.<br />
Yet another component <strong>of</strong> the Web-based CIS system is the Mobile based Monitoring & Evaluation System, which will help<br />
the ground staff alias WDTs (Watershed <strong>Development</strong> Team) to transmit information from the ground level to the central server.<br />
Also, any higher-up <strong>of</strong>ficial in charge <strong>of</strong> the project can obtain information regarding the project area on their mobile phone by<br />
means <strong>of</strong> an SMS. The system works in the following manner. The WDT equipped with a GPS instrument marks the latitudelongitude<br />
information <strong>of</strong> various treatment areas during the DPR. The probable sites are then transferred onto the central<br />
server. During the works phase, any progress in the treatment area is reported to the server by means <strong>of</strong> an SMS by the WDT.<br />
Similarly, any nodal <strong>of</strong>ficer or higher-up <strong>of</strong>ficial can view the progress in a project by means <strong>of</strong> summarized reports generated<br />
over frequent periods <strong>of</strong> time.<br />
Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-<strong>11</strong> 176
DWDU, Rajkot<br />
Vigilance and Monitoring Committees<br />
1. For every work sanctioned under the Scheme, there should be a local vigilance and monitoring committee, composed <strong>of</strong><br />
members <strong>of</strong> the locality or village where the work is undertaken, to monitor the progress and quality <strong>of</strong> work while it is in<br />
progress. The Gram Sabha will elect the members <strong>of</strong> this committee and ensure that SC/STs and women are represented on it.<br />
2. The Implementing Agency should apprise this committee <strong>of</strong> estimates regarding the work, time frame and quality parameters.<br />
The final report <strong>of</strong> the committee should be attached along with the Completion Certificate <strong>of</strong> the work, and should also be placed<br />
at the next meeting <strong>of</strong> the Gram Sabha in the Panchayat where work has been executed.<br />
3. Local beneficiary committees may also be constituted for effective articulation <strong>of</strong> their entitlements and their access to them.<br />
The PIA members will be responsible for ensuring that local monitoring committees/beneficiary committees are constituted.<br />
Research support in watershed management<br />
Watershed management requires the support <strong>of</strong> research. Watershed projects will be used as on-farm sites for research designed<br />
and implemented with significant involvement <strong>of</strong> farmers and extension workers to produce site-specific technological solutions.<br />
This leads to problems in adoption and up-scaling <strong>of</strong> research findings within specific watersheds. There is also the question <strong>of</strong> upscaling<br />
technologies and approaches beyond a designated watershed. At the same time, researchers will be able to relate research<br />
activities to the real problems facing farmers or to capture the locally developed or modified technologies. Yet there is a need to<br />
give technologies appropriate technical and scientific definition and to disseminate them widely.<br />
Farmer organization and empowerment<br />
The management <strong>of</strong> natural resources requires strong and effective farmer organizations. Such organizations empower<br />
farmers and create a good foundation for the transfer, adoption and use <strong>of</strong> information on new technologies. They also help in<br />
negotiating for inputs at favorable prices.<br />
Strong farmers’ organizations can be a conduit for services that meet felt needs. These needs include information to<br />
Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-<strong>11</strong> 177
DWDU, Rajkot<br />
improve production and marketing, credit, and demand driven approaches that ensure ownership and sustainability <strong>of</strong><br />
interventions.<br />
Farmers’ organization allows the use <strong>of</strong> participatory approaches that recognize local capacity and indigenous knowledge.<br />
It incorporates the aspirations and perceptions that influence decision-making, while giving farmers an important role in planning<br />
and implementation <strong>of</strong> watershed management activities. Such participation is important for the success, continuity and<br />
sustainability <strong>of</strong> the resource management programmes.<br />
Often a successful watershed knits together many aspects <strong>of</strong> the people’s lives apart from purely technical issues. Many<br />
conservation and basic group production initiatives have widened into a social movement dealing with matters such as weddings,<br />
funerals, care for the elderly and the disadvantaged, and other issues in the community.<br />
The initial natural resources focus also widens into a set <strong>of</strong> integrated activities such as the improvement <strong>of</strong> houses,<br />
provision <strong>of</strong> water and electricity, acquisition <strong>of</strong> improved tools, seeds and livestock, all in the name <strong>of</strong> watershed management.<br />
Empowerment <strong>of</strong> farmers therefore allows farmers to demand services and to ensure the continued role <strong>of</strong> the state in<br />
supporting watershed development.<br />
Use <strong>of</strong> traditional institutions and indigenous knowledge<br />
Experience has shown that to effectively reach the farmers and to create viable watershed management options, it is<br />
important to respect indigenous knowledge and combine it with the formal modern science and technology. Local traditional<br />
institutions should be part and parcel <strong>of</strong> the process. For instance, there is a lot <strong>of</strong> under-used indigenous knowledge about climate,<br />
soils, biodiversity and other production conditions that confront farmers. A lot <strong>of</strong> research findings are abstract to extension<br />
providers and farmers alike. Such findings need to be married with indigenous knowledge and disseminated in a language that<br />
farmers and members <strong>of</strong> traditional institutions can understand.<br />
Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-<strong>11</strong> 178
DWDU, Rajkot<br />
Plans For Project management:<br />
The Project management <strong>of</strong> any watershed programme is very important. It mainly depends upon the community<br />
organization and the village level institutes. Under all watersheds committee and various user groups and SHGs have been<br />
formulated for post project operation and maintenance <strong>of</strong> assets created during project period. Major emphasis will be on equity<br />
and sustainable benefit <strong>of</strong> the project even after implementation stage. A proper link-up will be built during project period with<br />
various institutes and capacity building organization. They will act as a major kingpin during post implementation for scaling up the<br />
successful experience during project.<br />
Watershed <strong>Development</strong> Fund:<br />
Such contributions will promote feeling <strong>of</strong> “ownership” <strong>of</strong> the programme among stakeholders. This will contribute to sustainable<br />
outcomes in the long-term. The voluntary contributions are saved in the Watershed <strong>Development</strong> Fund (WDF) that is to be used<br />
for repair, maintenance and use <strong>of</strong> assets created on common land. The contribution <strong>of</strong> it will comes mainly fund the following:<br />
Table No. 60. Details <strong>of</strong> Watershed <strong>Development</strong> Fund (WDF)<br />
Sl. No Financial Details Percent Contribution<br />
1 Natural Resource Management<br />
For General 10%<br />
For SC/ST 5%<br />
2 For Intensive Agriculture, Horticulture and animal Husbandry<br />
For General 20%<br />
For SC/ST 10%<br />
Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-<strong>11</strong> 179
DWDU, Rajkot<br />
It is planned that for SC/ST, BPL population the contribution will be taken in form <strong>of</strong> voluntary labour and the fund for labour will<br />
be diverted to the WDF.<br />
User Charges:<br />
Various user groups will be formed in village. These user groups will collect user charges according to the designated rules<br />
formed during the formation <strong>of</strong> user group. These funds will be transferred to the WDF funds as per these formulated rules. The<br />
secretary <strong>of</strong> watershed committee (WC) shall maintain the records <strong>of</strong> the following.<br />
Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-<strong>11</strong> 180
DWDU, Rajkot<br />
CHAPTER - 8<br />
MAPS<br />
Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-<strong>11</strong> 181