23.06.2014 Views

Fo c u s o n Tyre IM PorTs - SA TREADS

Fo c u s o n Tyre IM PorTs - SA TREADS

Fo c u s o n Tyre IM PorTs - SA TREADS

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Fo</strong>cus on <strong>Tyre</strong> Imports • 11<br />

tread tyres since many sizes in this category are not<br />

being locally produced, and the local companies<br />

cannot effectively meet growing demand.<br />

As of May of this year, the rebate in question was<br />

scrapped, allegedly with no warning, under instruction<br />

by <strong>SA</strong>RS, the administrator. What pre-empted this<br />

development has been the source of major contention<br />

and finger-pointing with no one party seemingly<br />

willing to take responsibility.<br />

Our investigations into the matter first led us to NRCS,<br />

the alleged instigator of the withdrawal process by<br />

way of a special application made to ITAC, which Dries<br />

van Tonder, Subject Specialist for NRCS categorically<br />

denied. He had this to say, by way of explanation:<br />

“NRCS is merely the National Regulator, there to<br />

❝<br />

It is becoming<br />

increasingly more<br />

difficult for us to<br />

compete against the<br />

local makes<br />

Trade Administration Act, 2002, administered by<br />

ITAC. Whilst <strong>SA</strong>RS administers the goods imported<br />

in terms of the Schedules to the Customs and Excise<br />

Act, 1964, the levels of rebates or ordinary customs<br />

duties and any other conditions that may also apply<br />

are determined by ITAC in terms of trade policy.<br />

“The rebate item for herringbone tread tyres as well as<br />

the rebate item for racing car tyres required approval<br />

from NRCS, so by law, NRCS was the responsible<br />

entity to approve the tyres imported under the<br />

respective rebate items.<br />

He added: “The deletion of rebate item<br />

460.07/4011.61 for herringbone tread tyres and the<br />

amendment of rebate item 460.07/4011.10 for racing<br />

car tyres were published in the Government Gazette<br />

ensure that any passenger or commercial tyre entering our borders is of of 15 March 2013 to give effect to the request by the Minister of Trade<br />

an acceptable quality as laid out by the Standards in place. As herringbone and Industry to implement the recommendations made by the International<br />

tyres (traditionally used on tractors and other slow moving vehicles), do not Trade Administration Commission in Report No. 423. ITAC also gave notice<br />

pose a danger to the consumer, they are not bound by the homologation of its intentions to review the said rebate items through Notice No. 570 of<br />

process, and therefore do not require inspection.<br />

2012, published in the Government Gazette of 20 July 2012.”<br />

❞<br />

“Therefore, inspecting containers of herringbone tyres at port sites for<br />

the purpose of financial rebates, was not only depleting our manpower<br />

resources, it was creating such a backlog that we were unable to effectively<br />

meet our responsibility towards the passenger and commercial tyre sector.<br />

But despite the publishing of this Notice, it appears the import sector was<br />

unaware of ITAC’s intention to cancel this agricultural rebate, claiming that<br />

unlike the <strong>SA</strong>TMC, which was approached for comment, they were not<br />

afforded the same opportunity.<br />

NRCS indicated that we do not wish to be involved with the inspection<br />

of herringbone and sporting tyres as well as the subsequent issuing of a<br />

rebate certificate. Never did we indicate or question the reason for the<br />

rebate or the cancellation of the rebate.”<br />

Dr. Etienne Human of the <strong>SA</strong>TMC confirmed that the <strong>SA</strong>TMC had in fact<br />

been approached for comment, but the controversy deepens further with<br />

Bridgestone <strong>SA</strong> and Apollo <strong>Tyre</strong>s apparently the only local manufacturers<br />

in the know. When approached for comment, Bridgestone admitted that<br />

Upon instruction from <strong>SA</strong>RS that the rebate had fallen away, we sent out the<br />

relevant correspondence, informing the industry that we would no longer<br />

be performing inspections for the sake of rebates.”<br />

The mystery deepens further with the subsequent unearthing of a<br />

document dated 30 January 2013 that was submitted to ITAC that clearly<br />

states that the review follows a notice by the NRCS that it would no longer<br />

issue certificates for the purpose of the relevant rebate provisions. *<br />

As for NRCS’s reference to <strong>SA</strong>RS, Adrian Lackay, Media spokesperson<br />

for <strong>SA</strong>RS had this to say: “Rebates and ordinary customs duties are<br />

governed by trade policy that falls within the ambit of the International

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!