Fo c u s o n Tyre IM PorTs - SA TREADS
Fo c u s o n Tyre IM PorTs - SA TREADS
Fo c u s o n Tyre IM PorTs - SA TREADS
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>Fo</strong>cus on <strong>Tyre</strong> Imports • 11<br />
tread tyres since many sizes in this category are not<br />
being locally produced, and the local companies<br />
cannot effectively meet growing demand.<br />
As of May of this year, the rebate in question was<br />
scrapped, allegedly with no warning, under instruction<br />
by <strong>SA</strong>RS, the administrator. What pre-empted this<br />
development has been the source of major contention<br />
and finger-pointing with no one party seemingly<br />
willing to take responsibility.<br />
Our investigations into the matter first led us to NRCS,<br />
the alleged instigator of the withdrawal process by<br />
way of a special application made to ITAC, which Dries<br />
van Tonder, Subject Specialist for NRCS categorically<br />
denied. He had this to say, by way of explanation:<br />
“NRCS is merely the National Regulator, there to<br />
❝<br />
It is becoming<br />
increasingly more<br />
difficult for us to<br />
compete against the<br />
local makes<br />
Trade Administration Act, 2002, administered by<br />
ITAC. Whilst <strong>SA</strong>RS administers the goods imported<br />
in terms of the Schedules to the Customs and Excise<br />
Act, 1964, the levels of rebates or ordinary customs<br />
duties and any other conditions that may also apply<br />
are determined by ITAC in terms of trade policy.<br />
“The rebate item for herringbone tread tyres as well as<br />
the rebate item for racing car tyres required approval<br />
from NRCS, so by law, NRCS was the responsible<br />
entity to approve the tyres imported under the<br />
respective rebate items.<br />
He added: “The deletion of rebate item<br />
460.07/4011.61 for herringbone tread tyres and the<br />
amendment of rebate item 460.07/4011.10 for racing<br />
car tyres were published in the Government Gazette<br />
ensure that any passenger or commercial tyre entering our borders is of of 15 March 2013 to give effect to the request by the Minister of Trade<br />
an acceptable quality as laid out by the Standards in place. As herringbone and Industry to implement the recommendations made by the International<br />
tyres (traditionally used on tractors and other slow moving vehicles), do not Trade Administration Commission in Report No. 423. ITAC also gave notice<br />
pose a danger to the consumer, they are not bound by the homologation of its intentions to review the said rebate items through Notice No. 570 of<br />
process, and therefore do not require inspection.<br />
2012, published in the Government Gazette of 20 July 2012.”<br />
❞<br />
“Therefore, inspecting containers of herringbone tyres at port sites for<br />
the purpose of financial rebates, was not only depleting our manpower<br />
resources, it was creating such a backlog that we were unable to effectively<br />
meet our responsibility towards the passenger and commercial tyre sector.<br />
But despite the publishing of this Notice, it appears the import sector was<br />
unaware of ITAC’s intention to cancel this agricultural rebate, claiming that<br />
unlike the <strong>SA</strong>TMC, which was approached for comment, they were not<br />
afforded the same opportunity.<br />
NRCS indicated that we do not wish to be involved with the inspection<br />
of herringbone and sporting tyres as well as the subsequent issuing of a<br />
rebate certificate. Never did we indicate or question the reason for the<br />
rebate or the cancellation of the rebate.”<br />
Dr. Etienne Human of the <strong>SA</strong>TMC confirmed that the <strong>SA</strong>TMC had in fact<br />
been approached for comment, but the controversy deepens further with<br />
Bridgestone <strong>SA</strong> and Apollo <strong>Tyre</strong>s apparently the only local manufacturers<br />
in the know. When approached for comment, Bridgestone admitted that<br />
Upon instruction from <strong>SA</strong>RS that the rebate had fallen away, we sent out the<br />
relevant correspondence, informing the industry that we would no longer<br />
be performing inspections for the sake of rebates.”<br />
The mystery deepens further with the subsequent unearthing of a<br />
document dated 30 January 2013 that was submitted to ITAC that clearly<br />
states that the review follows a notice by the NRCS that it would no longer<br />
issue certificates for the purpose of the relevant rebate provisions. *<br />
As for NRCS’s reference to <strong>SA</strong>RS, Adrian Lackay, Media spokesperson<br />
for <strong>SA</strong>RS had this to say: “Rebates and ordinary customs duties are<br />
governed by trade policy that falls within the ambit of the International