Human Rights Committee - Philippine Center for Investigative ...
Human Rights Committee - Philippine Center for Investigative ...
Human Rights Committee - Philippine Center for Investigative ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Despite the prohibition under Article VI, Section 10(a) of the Special Child<br />
Protection Act (Republic Act 7610) 29 of the jailing of children with adult prisoners as a<br />
<strong>for</strong>m of cruelty, neglect, abuse, and act that puts children in conditions inimical and<br />
injurious to their development, the Department of Justice has never initiated any<br />
investigation or prosecution of law en<strong>for</strong>cers, their superiors, and civilian authorities <strong>for</strong><br />
the widespread incarceration of children with adult crime suspects in police jails<br />
nationwide.<br />
This is because the DOJ and the <strong>Philippine</strong> National Police are in fact in cahoots<br />
in committing this inhumanity. DOJ prosecutors routinely charge police child prisoners in<br />
court and tacitly authorize law en<strong>for</strong>cers to imprison children in police jails swarming with<br />
adult crime suspects.<br />
Despite a long-standing petition by members of the public and the Coalition to<br />
require inquest prosecutors to ensure that children get diverted and turned over by law<br />
en<strong>for</strong>cers to the custody of social workers pursuant to the mandate of Article 191 of the<br />
Child and Youth Welfare Code or Presidential Decree 603, the <strong>Philippine</strong> state persists<br />
in committing this brutality against children who mostly belong to the poorest of the poor.<br />
This underscores the climate of impunity, animated by esprit de corps among<br />
public officials, surrounding the state crime of jailing children with adult crime suspects.<br />
Commission on <strong>Human</strong> <strong>Rights</strong><br />
The <strong>Philippine</strong> Commission on <strong>Human</strong> <strong>Rights</strong> (CHR) has repeatedly decried the<br />
<strong>Philippine</strong> government’s unjustifiable neglect in complying with its mandatory treaty<br />
obligations. As evidenced by its resolution dated December 17, 2003, 30 the Commission<br />
on <strong>Human</strong> <strong>Rights</strong> has been demanding <strong>for</strong> the Office of the President to observe the<br />
<strong>Philippine</strong> government’s obligation under the Covenant. However, the Commission’s<br />
plea remains unheeded up to this day.<br />
Office of the President<br />
No power in the <strong>Philippine</strong>s could en<strong>for</strong>ce the diversion of children at the precise<br />
point of arrest other than the Office of the President. This is because of the multifaceted<br />
and multi-layered nature of the twin evils of police child detention and the mixing<br />
up of children with adult crime suspects in an institutionalized, continuing, and<br />
widespread manner. Hence, coordinative and collaborative actions and ef<strong>for</strong>ts need to<br />
be exerted by, between, and among the governmental departments and agencies that<br />
are all under the sole and exclusive supervisory authority, power, and control of the<br />
President. These include the Department of Justice, the Department of Interior and<br />
Local Governments, and the Department of Social Welfare and Development. DILG<br />
controls both the <strong>Philippine</strong> National Police and Bureau of Jail Management and<br />
Penology. All these departments have to be mobilized in order to ensure the proper<br />
en<strong>for</strong>cement of the Child and Youth Welfare Code <strong>for</strong> law en<strong>for</strong>cers to commit to the<br />
custody of social workers all children upon arrest without exemption and without<br />
qualification.<br />
It is the President who appoints the heads of DSWD, DILG, and DOJ. All the<br />
secretaries of these departments take their cue from and follow the policy priorities and<br />
47