29.06.2014 Views

Long-term Debt Limits in Saskatchewan - Nipawin

Long-term Debt Limits in Saskatchewan - Nipawin

Long-term Debt Limits in Saskatchewan - Nipawin

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Introduction<br />

In <strong>Saskatchewan</strong>, many municipalities are tak<strong>in</strong>g on<br />

debt to f<strong>in</strong>ance the costs associated with development<br />

and a grow<strong>in</strong>g prov<strong>in</strong>cial economy. One issue that has<br />

recently become more important for urban municipalities<br />

<strong>in</strong> <strong>Saskatchewan</strong> is the legislation surround<strong>in</strong>g municipal<br />

long-<strong>term</strong> debt. At its 107th Annual Convention, SUMA<br />

passed a resolution to work with the M<strong>in</strong>istry of Municipal<br />

Affairs to <strong>in</strong>itiate a review of the criteria for establish<strong>in</strong>g long<strong>term</strong><br />

debt limits. This report is an analysis of long-<strong>term</strong>-debt<br />

legislation <strong>in</strong> <strong>Saskatchewan</strong>, as well as a stakeholder analysis<br />

of the issues and concerns surround<strong>in</strong>g this policy. The report<br />

conta<strong>in</strong>s four ma<strong>in</strong> sections:<br />

1. An analysis of municipal long-<strong>term</strong> debt legislation <strong>in</strong><br />

<strong>Saskatchewan</strong>: This section exam<strong>in</strong>es the legislation govern<strong>in</strong>g<br />

municipal long-<strong>term</strong> debt <strong>in</strong> the prov<strong>in</strong>ce of <strong>Saskatchewan</strong>.<br />

2. A stakeholder analysis: To ga<strong>in</strong> an adequate<br />

understand<strong>in</strong>g of the perspective of municipalities on long<strong>term</strong><br />

debt policy, a stakeholder consultation and analysis<br />

was performed utiliz<strong>in</strong>g a survey and a number of <strong>in</strong>terviews.<br />

Several urban governments were <strong>in</strong>terviewed, and over 100<br />

were surveyed. The purpose of this section is to construct<br />

a def<strong>in</strong>ition of the problems that municipalities are fac<strong>in</strong>g<br />

with regard to f<strong>in</strong>ancial capacity and long-<strong>term</strong> debt issues.<br />

3. A comparative perspective on long-<strong>term</strong> debt policy:<br />

This section provides a comparative assessment of<br />

the policies and regulations surround<strong>in</strong>g municipal long<strong>term</strong><br />

debt <strong>in</strong> other prov<strong>in</strong>ces. The purpose of this section is<br />

to provide examples of alternative policies used elsewhere<br />

that could <strong>in</strong>form discussions on potential modifications to<br />

<strong>Saskatchewan</strong> policies.<br />

4. Recommendations: This section provides some<br />

recommendations on how policies and processes might<br />

be improved.<br />

An Overview of Municipal Borrow<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Municipal expenses are generally funded <strong>in</strong> two ways:<br />

<strong>in</strong>ternal and external revenue sources. Internal revenue<br />

sources <strong>in</strong>clude: operat<strong>in</strong>g revenues; earmarked taxes,<br />

reserves and reserve funds, special charges (improvement<br />

charges or levies, lot levies, and other special fees), and<br />

development charges. External revenue sources fall <strong>in</strong>to<br />

two basic categories: grants and borrow<strong>in</strong>g. Grants are<br />

transfers from the prov<strong>in</strong>cial or federal levels of government.<br />

Borrow<strong>in</strong>g is when the municipality accesses capital through<br />

borrow<strong>in</strong>g arrangements, and this practice has become<br />

much more common as municipalities are expected to<br />

deliver a greater level of services (Kitchen 2002, 193–202).<br />

Municipal Borrow<strong>in</strong>g:<br />

Short-<strong>term</strong> Borrow<strong>in</strong>g:<br />

Short-<strong>term</strong> borrow<strong>in</strong>g can be used to f<strong>in</strong>ance capital<br />

expenditures or cover short-<strong>term</strong> deficits <strong>in</strong> general operat<strong>in</strong>g<br />

budgets (Kitchen 2002, 202).<br />

<strong>Long</strong>-<strong>term</strong> Borrow<strong>in</strong>g:<br />

<strong>Long</strong>-<strong>term</strong> borrow<strong>in</strong>g is used for capital expenditures<br />

only, and “is justified if one can reasonably expect the benefits<br />

from the project to fall on future users, so that the f<strong>in</strong>anc<strong>in</strong>g<br />

<strong>term</strong> will match the asset’s lifespan. The project is f<strong>in</strong>anced<br />

by borrowed funds and the pr<strong>in</strong>ciple and <strong>in</strong>terest charges are<br />

repaid out of future operat<strong>in</strong>g revenues. This policy attempts<br />

to make sure that future beneficiaries are also those who<br />

bear the costs” (Kitchen 2002, 202). Borrow<strong>in</strong>g is typically<br />

controlled by prov<strong>in</strong>cial regulations. The reason for prov<strong>in</strong>cial<br />

limits be<strong>in</strong>g placed on municipalities is that “municipalities<br />

are creatures of the prov<strong>in</strong>ce and the prov<strong>in</strong>ces do not wish<br />

to be responsible for unlimited municipal borrow<strong>in</strong>g and<br />

possible repayment of municipal debt” (Kitchen 2002, 202).<br />

Borrow<strong>in</strong>g is controlled through regulations such as those<br />

that limit borrow<strong>in</strong>g to:<br />

• n Capital projects<br />

• n Tax payer approved debt<br />

• n <strong>Debt</strong> approved by prov<strong>in</strong>cial regulatory body<br />

• n A specified percentage of revenue for f<strong>in</strong>anc<strong>in</strong>g debt<br />

• n Limit<strong>in</strong>g borrow<strong>in</strong>g to a prov<strong>in</strong>cially controlled<br />

“municipal fund” (Kitchen 2002, 202–203)<br />

Every prov<strong>in</strong>ce, with the exception of Ontario, makes use<br />

of a prov<strong>in</strong>cially-organized body that assists municipalities<br />

with undertak<strong>in</strong>g long-<strong>term</strong> borrow<strong>in</strong>g. In these prov<strong>in</strong>ces,<br />

municipalities “apply for funds through the prov<strong>in</strong>ce-wide<br />

authority which totals up all of the requests for local funds<br />

and issues long-<strong>term</strong> debentures aga<strong>in</strong>st the authority itself.<br />

. . When the authority receives the proceeds from the sale of<br />

the debentures, it distributes the funds among the request<strong>in</strong>g<br />

municipalities, usually on the basis of a loan agreement with<br />

the municipality” (Kitchen 2002, 203).<br />

Decisions on f<strong>in</strong>anc<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>struments, whether to borrow<br />

<strong>in</strong> the short-<strong>term</strong> or long-<strong>term</strong>, and whether to take<br />

on debt of any k<strong>in</strong>d are largely made based on the needs<br />

of the municipality, tak<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>to account f<strong>in</strong>ancial capacity,<br />

<strong>in</strong>terest-rates, level of growth, and other factors. Many<br />

municipalities <strong>in</strong> <strong>Saskatchewan</strong> are experienc<strong>in</strong>g growth,<br />

and thus are mak<strong>in</strong>g large <strong>in</strong>vestments <strong>in</strong> major capital<br />

projects such as recreational facilities, sub-division<br />

expansions, water and sewer, waste disposal, etc.<br />

With relatively low <strong>in</strong>terest rates, coupled with the recent<br />

availability of federal and prov<strong>in</strong>cial stimulus fund<strong>in</strong>g that<br />

provided matched fund<strong>in</strong>g for <strong>in</strong>frastructure projects,<br />

municipalities <strong>in</strong> the prov<strong>in</strong>ce have been <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g their<br />

3

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!