Long-term Debt Limits in Saskatchewan - Nipawin
Long-term Debt Limits in Saskatchewan - Nipawin
Long-term Debt Limits in Saskatchewan - Nipawin
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Introduction<br />
In <strong>Saskatchewan</strong>, many municipalities are tak<strong>in</strong>g on<br />
debt to f<strong>in</strong>ance the costs associated with development<br />
and a grow<strong>in</strong>g prov<strong>in</strong>cial economy. One issue that has<br />
recently become more important for urban municipalities<br />
<strong>in</strong> <strong>Saskatchewan</strong> is the legislation surround<strong>in</strong>g municipal<br />
long-<strong>term</strong> debt. At its 107th Annual Convention, SUMA<br />
passed a resolution to work with the M<strong>in</strong>istry of Municipal<br />
Affairs to <strong>in</strong>itiate a review of the criteria for establish<strong>in</strong>g long<strong>term</strong><br />
debt limits. This report is an analysis of long-<strong>term</strong>-debt<br />
legislation <strong>in</strong> <strong>Saskatchewan</strong>, as well as a stakeholder analysis<br />
of the issues and concerns surround<strong>in</strong>g this policy. The report<br />
conta<strong>in</strong>s four ma<strong>in</strong> sections:<br />
1. An analysis of municipal long-<strong>term</strong> debt legislation <strong>in</strong><br />
<strong>Saskatchewan</strong>: This section exam<strong>in</strong>es the legislation govern<strong>in</strong>g<br />
municipal long-<strong>term</strong> debt <strong>in</strong> the prov<strong>in</strong>ce of <strong>Saskatchewan</strong>.<br />
2. A stakeholder analysis: To ga<strong>in</strong> an adequate<br />
understand<strong>in</strong>g of the perspective of municipalities on long<strong>term</strong><br />
debt policy, a stakeholder consultation and analysis<br />
was performed utiliz<strong>in</strong>g a survey and a number of <strong>in</strong>terviews.<br />
Several urban governments were <strong>in</strong>terviewed, and over 100<br />
were surveyed. The purpose of this section is to construct<br />
a def<strong>in</strong>ition of the problems that municipalities are fac<strong>in</strong>g<br />
with regard to f<strong>in</strong>ancial capacity and long-<strong>term</strong> debt issues.<br />
3. A comparative perspective on long-<strong>term</strong> debt policy:<br />
This section provides a comparative assessment of<br />
the policies and regulations surround<strong>in</strong>g municipal long<strong>term</strong><br />
debt <strong>in</strong> other prov<strong>in</strong>ces. The purpose of this section is<br />
to provide examples of alternative policies used elsewhere<br />
that could <strong>in</strong>form discussions on potential modifications to<br />
<strong>Saskatchewan</strong> policies.<br />
4. Recommendations: This section provides some<br />
recommendations on how policies and processes might<br />
be improved.<br />
An Overview of Municipal Borrow<strong>in</strong>g<br />
Municipal expenses are generally funded <strong>in</strong> two ways:<br />
<strong>in</strong>ternal and external revenue sources. Internal revenue<br />
sources <strong>in</strong>clude: operat<strong>in</strong>g revenues; earmarked taxes,<br />
reserves and reserve funds, special charges (improvement<br />
charges or levies, lot levies, and other special fees), and<br />
development charges. External revenue sources fall <strong>in</strong>to<br />
two basic categories: grants and borrow<strong>in</strong>g. Grants are<br />
transfers from the prov<strong>in</strong>cial or federal levels of government.<br />
Borrow<strong>in</strong>g is when the municipality accesses capital through<br />
borrow<strong>in</strong>g arrangements, and this practice has become<br />
much more common as municipalities are expected to<br />
deliver a greater level of services (Kitchen 2002, 193–202).<br />
Municipal Borrow<strong>in</strong>g:<br />
Short-<strong>term</strong> Borrow<strong>in</strong>g:<br />
Short-<strong>term</strong> borrow<strong>in</strong>g can be used to f<strong>in</strong>ance capital<br />
expenditures or cover short-<strong>term</strong> deficits <strong>in</strong> general operat<strong>in</strong>g<br />
budgets (Kitchen 2002, 202).<br />
<strong>Long</strong>-<strong>term</strong> Borrow<strong>in</strong>g:<br />
<strong>Long</strong>-<strong>term</strong> borrow<strong>in</strong>g is used for capital expenditures<br />
only, and “is justified if one can reasonably expect the benefits<br />
from the project to fall on future users, so that the f<strong>in</strong>anc<strong>in</strong>g<br />
<strong>term</strong> will match the asset’s lifespan. The project is f<strong>in</strong>anced<br />
by borrowed funds and the pr<strong>in</strong>ciple and <strong>in</strong>terest charges are<br />
repaid out of future operat<strong>in</strong>g revenues. This policy attempts<br />
to make sure that future beneficiaries are also those who<br />
bear the costs” (Kitchen 2002, 202). Borrow<strong>in</strong>g is typically<br />
controlled by prov<strong>in</strong>cial regulations. The reason for prov<strong>in</strong>cial<br />
limits be<strong>in</strong>g placed on municipalities is that “municipalities<br />
are creatures of the prov<strong>in</strong>ce and the prov<strong>in</strong>ces do not wish<br />
to be responsible for unlimited municipal borrow<strong>in</strong>g and<br />
possible repayment of municipal debt” (Kitchen 2002, 202).<br />
Borrow<strong>in</strong>g is controlled through regulations such as those<br />
that limit borrow<strong>in</strong>g to:<br />
• n Capital projects<br />
• n Tax payer approved debt<br />
• n <strong>Debt</strong> approved by prov<strong>in</strong>cial regulatory body<br />
• n A specified percentage of revenue for f<strong>in</strong>anc<strong>in</strong>g debt<br />
• n Limit<strong>in</strong>g borrow<strong>in</strong>g to a prov<strong>in</strong>cially controlled<br />
“municipal fund” (Kitchen 2002, 202–203)<br />
Every prov<strong>in</strong>ce, with the exception of Ontario, makes use<br />
of a prov<strong>in</strong>cially-organized body that assists municipalities<br />
with undertak<strong>in</strong>g long-<strong>term</strong> borrow<strong>in</strong>g. In these prov<strong>in</strong>ces,<br />
municipalities “apply for funds through the prov<strong>in</strong>ce-wide<br />
authority which totals up all of the requests for local funds<br />
and issues long-<strong>term</strong> debentures aga<strong>in</strong>st the authority itself.<br />
. . When the authority receives the proceeds from the sale of<br />
the debentures, it distributes the funds among the request<strong>in</strong>g<br />
municipalities, usually on the basis of a loan agreement with<br />
the municipality” (Kitchen 2002, 203).<br />
Decisions on f<strong>in</strong>anc<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>struments, whether to borrow<br />
<strong>in</strong> the short-<strong>term</strong> or long-<strong>term</strong>, and whether to take<br />
on debt of any k<strong>in</strong>d are largely made based on the needs<br />
of the municipality, tak<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>to account f<strong>in</strong>ancial capacity,<br />
<strong>in</strong>terest-rates, level of growth, and other factors. Many<br />
municipalities <strong>in</strong> <strong>Saskatchewan</strong> are experienc<strong>in</strong>g growth,<br />
and thus are mak<strong>in</strong>g large <strong>in</strong>vestments <strong>in</strong> major capital<br />
projects such as recreational facilities, sub-division<br />
expansions, water and sewer, waste disposal, etc.<br />
With relatively low <strong>in</strong>terest rates, coupled with the recent<br />
availability of federal and prov<strong>in</strong>cial stimulus fund<strong>in</strong>g that<br />
provided matched fund<strong>in</strong>g for <strong>in</strong>frastructure projects,<br />
municipalities <strong>in</strong> the prov<strong>in</strong>ce have been <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g their<br />
3