Strategy for Wild Deer in Scotland - Draft for Public Consultation 2007
Strategy for Wild Deer in Scotland - Draft for Public Consultation 2007
Strategy for Wild Deer in Scotland - Draft for Public Consultation 2007
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Across most of <strong>Scotland</strong> wild deer are managed<br />
as an <strong>in</strong>tegral part of the wider natural resource<br />
and land use pattern. Integration with other<br />
land-use policy is there<strong>for</strong>e vital. In recent<br />
years the Scottish Government has published<br />
strategies on agriculture and <strong>for</strong>estry (2006)<br />
and the Scottish Rural Development Programme<br />
(<strong>2007</strong>) provides the overall context and<br />
implementation mechanisms.<br />
Increas<strong>in</strong>gly, the Scottish Government is seek<strong>in</strong>g<br />
to <strong>in</strong>tegrate its approach to deliver<strong>in</strong>g rural<br />
and environmental services <strong>in</strong> a way that is<br />
more effective and efficient. This strategy <strong>for</strong><br />
wild deer aims to be a further step towards a<br />
more <strong>in</strong>tegrated approach to land management<br />
policy <strong>in</strong> <strong>Scotland</strong>.<br />
2.3 Deliver<strong>in</strong>g a range of objectives <strong>in</strong> a<br />
chang<strong>in</strong>g context<br />
<strong>Wild</strong> deer are managed to meet a wide range of<br />
objectives. These <strong>in</strong>clude a range of what are<br />
often termed ‘public objectives’ (collectively<br />
the ‘public <strong>in</strong>terest’) articulated through the<br />
public policy identified <strong>in</strong> Section 2.2 and a<br />
range of what are often termed ‘private<br />
objectives’, referr<strong>in</strong>g to the legitimate aims<br />
of <strong>in</strong>dividual land managers, organisations or<br />
bus<strong>in</strong>esses which are of value to themselves.<br />
In practice of course, most enterprises pursue<br />
both ‘private’ and ‘public’ objectives together<br />
<strong>in</strong> their management objectives. Both with<strong>in</strong><br />
and between the ‘public’ and ‘private’ labels<br />
there are likely to be some objectives that are<br />
potentially conflict<strong>in</strong>g and some which are<br />
complementary. The emphasis throughout this<br />
strategy is on identify<strong>in</strong>g the full range of<br />
relevant objectives, seek<strong>in</strong>g to reconcile the<br />
conflicts and identify<strong>in</strong>g the synergy.<br />
The <strong>in</strong>teraction of wild deer with other land-use<br />
or management objectives is one of the key<br />
drivers of their management. For example, wild<br />
deer can have a significant impact on woodland<br />
establishment, agricultural production, habitat<br />
condition and road safety. In order to help<br />
deliver objectives such as woodland establishment<br />
or biodiversity conservation, the numbers of<br />
wild deer are there<strong>for</strong>e managed either at an<br />
<strong>in</strong>dividual or population level <strong>in</strong> relation to the<br />
impacts they have. Annex 1 outl<strong>in</strong>es these<br />
<strong>in</strong>teractions further.<br />
Management objectives are part of a complex<br />
decision-mak<strong>in</strong>g process and will respond to<br />
changes <strong>in</strong> the wider environmental, economic<br />
and social context. The key factors likely to<br />
affect the objectives of deer management <strong>in</strong><br />
the future <strong>in</strong>clude:<br />
Economic circumstances – as deer management<br />
is often only one aspect of multi-faceted rural<br />
bus<strong>in</strong>esses, broader economic trends will affect<br />
land management decisions, both those directly<br />
relat<strong>in</strong>g to deer and those relat<strong>in</strong>g to other<br />
land-uses with which deer <strong>in</strong>teract. Levels of<br />
personal wealth, patterns of land ownership,<br />
market trends and the fiscal regime will all have<br />
an effect on <strong>in</strong>vestment <strong>in</strong> land management<br />
and <strong>in</strong> determ<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g management objectives.<br />
Legislative/policy change – future legislative<br />
change or government change may lead to<br />
changes <strong>in</strong> legislation, either specifically to<br />
wild deer legislation or broader legislation that<br />
affects the way natural resources are managed,<br />
<strong>for</strong> example further land or agricultural re<strong>for</strong>m,<br />
nature conservation or new approaches to<br />
develop<strong>in</strong>g a low carbon economy. Government<br />
is likely to cont<strong>in</strong>ually seek to adjust the<br />
balance between objectives <strong>in</strong> pursu<strong>in</strong>g the<br />
public <strong>in</strong>terest and changes <strong>in</strong> government may<br />
br<strong>in</strong>g more substantial adjustments. Changes<br />
may also be <strong>in</strong>troduced as a result of further<br />
legislation <strong>in</strong> an EU context.<br />
A Jo<strong>in</strong>t Agency <strong>Strategy</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Wild</strong> <strong>Deer</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>Scotland</strong><br />
<strong>Draft</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Public</strong> <strong>Consultation</strong> <strong>2007</strong><br />
7