15.07.2014 Views

05 Classification of.. - Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences

05 Classification of.. - Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences

05 Classification of.. - Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

86<br />

events (see Chapter 1.07–1.09). Although most<br />

chondrites experienced thermal processing on their<br />

parent asteroids, such as aqueous alteration,<br />

thermal, <strong>and</strong> shock metamorphism, they did not<br />

experience melting <strong>and</strong> igneous differentiation,<br />

<strong>and</strong> thus largely preserve records <strong>of</strong> physical <strong>and</strong><br />

chemical processes in the solar nebula. Deciphering<br />

these records is a primary goal <strong>of</strong> chondrite<br />

studies.<br />

Nonchondritic meteorites lack chondritic textures<br />

<strong>and</strong> are formed by partial or complete<br />

melting <strong>and</strong> planetary differentiation <strong>of</strong> chondritic<br />

precursor asteroids or larger planetary bodies<br />

(Mars, Moon), <strong>and</strong> hence provide unique opportunities<br />

to study these processes on extraterrestrial<br />

bodies (see Chapter 1.11, 1.12, 1.21, <strong>and</strong> 1.22).<br />

Several groups <strong>of</strong> nonchondritic meteorites<br />

experienced only low degrees <strong>of</strong> melting, <strong>and</strong><br />

have largely retained their chondritic bulk compositions.<br />

To emphasize the relatively unprocessed<br />

nature <strong>of</strong> these nonchondrites <strong>and</strong> their<br />

intermediate status relative to chondrites <strong>and</strong><br />

highly differentiated meteorites, they are referred<br />

to as primitive achondrites <strong>and</strong> discussed as a<br />

separate category <strong>of</strong> nonchondritic meteorites.<br />

1.<strong>05</strong>.2 CLASSIFICATION OF CHONDRITIC<br />

METEORITES<br />

1.<strong>05</strong>.2.1 Taxonomy<br />

Based on bulk chemistry (Figures 2 <strong>and</strong> 3),<br />

bulk oxygen isotopic compositions (Figure 4),<br />

mineralogy, petrology (Figures 8–13 <strong>and</strong> 15), <strong>and</strong><br />

proportions <strong>of</strong> various chondritic components<br />

(Table 2), 14 chondrite groups have been<br />

recognized. Several other chondrites are mineralogically<br />

<strong>and</strong>/or chemically unique <strong>and</strong> defy<br />

classification into the existing chondrite groups;<br />

these are commonly called ungrouped chondrites<br />

(Table 1 <strong>and</strong> Figure 1).<br />

Conventionally, a chondrite “group” is defined<br />

as having a minimum <strong>of</strong> five unpaired chondrites<br />

<strong>of</strong> similar mineralogy, petrography, bulk isotopic<br />

properties, <strong>and</strong> bulk chemical compositions in<br />

major, nonvolatile elements. According to this<br />

definition, K chondrites could be considered as a<br />

grouplet: there are only two known K chondrites<br />

(see K (Kakangari-like) chondrites).<br />

Thirteen out <strong>of</strong> the 14 chondrite groups<br />

comprise three major classes: carbonaceous (C),<br />

ordinary (O), <strong>and</strong> enstatite (E), each <strong>of</strong> which<br />

contains distinct groups.<br />

The term carbonaceous is somewhat <strong>of</strong> a<br />

misnomer, because only the CI, CM, <strong>and</strong> CR<br />

chondrites are significantly enriched in carbon<br />

relative to noncarbonaceous chondrites (Figure 5).<br />

The CI chondrites lack chondrules. Carbonaceous<br />

<strong>and</strong> noncarbonaceous chondrites can be resolved<br />

<strong>Classification</strong> <strong>of</strong> Meteorites<br />

(with some exceptions) by several characteristics:<br />

(i) mean refractory lithophile/Si abundance<br />

ratios relative to CI chondrites ($1.00 in carbonaceous<br />

chondrites, #0.95 in noncarbonaceous<br />

chondrites); (ii) oxygen isotopic composition<br />

(D 17 O #22‰ for carbonaceous chondrites,<br />

except CI; D 17 O$21‰ for noncarbonaceous<br />

chondrites); (iii) refractory inclusion abundances<br />

($0.1 vol.% in carbonaceous chondrites, except<br />

CI; #0.1 vol.% in noncarbonaceous chondrites);<br />

<strong>and</strong> (iv) matrix/chondrule modal abundance ratio<br />

($0.9 in carbonaceous chondrites, except CH <strong>and</strong><br />

CB; #0.9 in noncarbonaceous chondrites, except<br />

K chondrites) (Kallemeyn et al., 1996).<br />

There are eight well-resolved groups <strong>of</strong> carbonaceous<br />

chondrites: CI, CM, CR, CH, CB, CV,<br />

CK, <strong>and</strong> CO. The letters designating the groups<br />

refer to a typical chondrite (commonly fall)<br />

in the group: CI (Ivuna-like), CM (Migheilike),<br />

CO (Ornans-like), CR (Renazzo-like),<br />

CH (ALH85085-like), CB (Bencubbin-like), CV<br />

(Vigarano-like), <strong>and</strong> CK (Karoonda-like). The<br />

exception to this rule is the CH group, in which the<br />

“H” refers to high metal abundance <strong>and</strong> high iron<br />

concentration (Bisch<strong>of</strong>f et al., 1993b).<br />

Ordinary chondrites are divided into three<br />

groups: H, L, <strong>and</strong> LL. The letters designating the<br />

groups refer to the bulk iron contents: H chondrites<br />

have high total iron contents, L chondrites have<br />

low total iron contents, <strong>and</strong> LL chondrites have<br />

low metallic iron relative to total iron, as well<br />

as low total iron contents.<br />

Enstatite chondrites comprise two groups with<br />

different contents <strong>of</strong> metallic iron: EH <strong>and</strong> EL.<br />

Additionally, there is an ungrouped E chondrite,<br />

LEW87223 (Grossman et al., 1993).<br />

R (Rumuruti-like) <strong>and</strong> K (Kakangari-like)<br />

chondrite groups are different from other chondrites<br />

<strong>and</strong> have been suggested to represent<br />

additional chondrite classes.<br />

The term clan is used as a higher order <strong>of</strong><br />

classification than group. It was originally defined<br />

to encompass chondrites that have chemical,<br />

mineralogical, <strong>and</strong> isotopic similarities <strong>and</strong> were<br />

believed to have formed at about the same time in<br />

the same small region <strong>of</strong> the solar nebula, in a<br />

narrow range <strong>of</strong> heliocentric distances (Kallemeyn<br />

<strong>and</strong> Wasson, 1981; Kallemeyn et al., 1996).<br />

Weisberg et al. (1995a) used the term for<br />

chondrites that have chemical, mineralogical,<br />

<strong>and</strong> isotopic similarities suggesting a petrogenetic<br />

kinship, but have petrologic <strong>and</strong>/or bulk chemical<br />

characteristics that challenge a group relationship.<br />

Four carbonaceous chondrite clans have been<br />

recognized: (i) the CR clan, which includes the<br />

CR, CH, CB, <strong>and</strong> a unique chondrite LEW85332;<br />

(ii) the CM–CO clan; (iii) the CV–CK clan;<br />

<strong>and</strong> (iv) the CI clan (Kallemeyn et al., 1996).<br />

The noncarbonaceous chondrites constitute three<br />

clans: OþR, E, <strong>and</strong> K.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!