15.07.2014 Views

Sharashkin, Leonid. The socioeconomic and cultural significance of

Sharashkin, Leonid. The socioeconomic and cultural significance of

Sharashkin, Leonid. The socioeconomic and cultural significance of

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>The</strong> collectivized sector <strong>of</strong> agriculture (99.6% <strong>of</strong> agri<strong>cultural</strong> producers were collectivized<br />

by 1955) witnessed a significant growth over the post-war decades (Matskevich<br />

1967). By the mid-1950s, grain production exceeded the 1913 level (pre-WWI <strong>and</strong> prerevolution)<br />

<strong>and</strong> between 1950 <strong>and</strong> 1970 increased by more than 2.3 times to 186.8 million<br />

tonnes (Goskomstat 1971). Production <strong>of</strong> meat by kolkhozes <strong>and</strong> sovkhozes rose six<br />

fold between 1940 <strong>and</strong> 1970 to 8 million tonnes per year. <strong>The</strong>se advances were largely<br />

achieved by government-m<strong>and</strong>ated <strong>and</strong> government-sponsored industrialization <strong>of</strong> agriculture.<br />

Thus, between 1950 <strong>and</strong> 1974 the production <strong>of</strong> plough-tractors increased by 79% to<br />

218,000 units per year, <strong>and</strong> the production <strong>of</strong> cereal harvesters increased by 91% to 88,400<br />

units per year. Between 1950 <strong>and</strong> 1972, the supply <strong>of</strong> NPK fertilizers to Soviet agriculture<br />

increased almost ten fold, <strong>and</strong> the rate <strong>of</strong> NPK application increased from 7.3 to 55.9 kg/ha<br />

per year (Goskomstat 1975).<br />

At the same time, the “private” (household-based) sector continued to grow as well <strong>and</strong><br />

by the mid-1950s accounted for 25% <strong>of</strong> the country’s agri<strong>cultural</strong> output (Wadekin 1973).<br />

Yet, throughout the Soviet period, the authorities have maintained an ambivalent attitude<br />

to household producers: their importance to food security was tacitly recognized, yet the<br />

government refrained from providing any support to household production so as not to<br />

encourage any “capitalistic,” private ownership tendencies (Lovell 2003).<br />

Gorbachev’s perestroika, the subsequent disintegration <strong>of</strong> the USSR, <strong>and</strong> Russia’s liberal<br />

reforms radically altered the picture. As the state withdrew support to agri<strong>cultural</strong><br />

producers in the early 1990s, kolkhoz <strong>and</strong> sovkhoz production dwindled. Yet, at the same<br />

time, l<strong>and</strong> became more readily available for household producers, which resulted in a<br />

sharp increase in the number <strong>of</strong> household producers <strong>and</strong> their output. It is recognized that<br />

the maintenance <strong>of</strong> adequate levels <strong>of</strong> food security over the transition period <strong>of</strong> 1990s was<br />

11

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!