ENC 1101 - Faculty Website Index Valencia College
ENC 1101 - Faculty Website Index Valencia College
ENC 1101 - Faculty Website Index Valencia College
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>ENC</strong> <strong>1101</strong> - Fresh Composition I<br />
CRN # 10933<br />
Jennifer J. Snow, Professor<br />
<strong>Valencia</strong> <strong>College</strong><br />
jsnow4@valenciacollege.edu<br />
Fall 2011 (407) 516-0862<br />
Online Format Virtual office hours: Monday + Wednesday 10:00 – 11:30<br />
(via Lake Nona Campus)<br />
(fastest responses to course messages sent at those times)<br />
Required Materials:<br />
- Writing Today, 2 nd Edition; eds. Pharr & Buscemi; ISBN 978-0-07-353322-3<br />
- The Brief Wadsworth Handbook; eds. Kirszner & Mandell<br />
- Regular access to the internet with frequent visits to:<br />
Atlas email, Blackboard LMS, <strong>Valencia</strong> library databases, and the<br />
course website at the following url: http://bit.ly/oF5SLb<br />
- The ability to view flash and java script-reliant content, to open .pdf, and to open and edit .odt files<br />
Description: Development of essay form, including documented essay; instruction and practice in expository writing.<br />
Emphasis on clarity of central and support ideas, adequate development, logical organization, coherence, appropriate<br />
citing of primary and/or secondary sources, and grammatical and mechanical accuracy. Gordon Rule course in which the<br />
student is required to demonstrate college-level writing skills through multiple assignments. Minimum grade of “C” is required<br />
if <strong>ENC</strong> <strong>1101</strong> is used to satisfy Gordon Rule and General Education Requirements.<br />
Prerequisites: Score of 83 on writing component of CPT or equivalent score on other state-approved entry test or minimum<br />
grade of C in <strong>ENC</strong> 0012 and <strong>ENC</strong> 0012L or <strong>ENC</strong> 0012C or EAP 1640 or ENS 1441; also, score of 83 on reading component of<br />
CPT or equivalent score on other state-approved entry test or minimum grade of C in REA 0002 and REA 0002L or REA 0002C<br />
or EAP 1620 or ENS 1421.<br />
This course builds on a set of basic competencies: an understanding of and ability to apply the grammatical conventions of<br />
Standard U.S.-American English; the knowledge of how to construct simple sentences and paragraphs; an understanding of<br />
the basic structure of an essay; an ability to read at the high school level. This course teaches techniques of critical<br />
reception and thinking, style, and rhetoric necessary for academic writing and college-level scholarship.<br />
Major Outcomes: Upon completing this course, students will demonstrate the ability to -<br />
1) write organized, focused, coherent, and substantially supported multi-paragraph essays;<br />
2) apply conventional rhetorical forms to write on subjects related to academic courses and topics of current interest;<br />
3) demonstrate the ability to apply higher-order thinking skills such as analysis, synthesis, and evaluation to collegelevel<br />
reading, research, and writing assignments;<br />
4) apply the major grammatical conventions of Standard U.S.-American English accurately to written<br />
communications;<br />
5) locate and extract information from sources, and accurately document primary and secondary sources.<br />
There are 5 main competency areas that contribute to this course, and, while most are inextricably connected, each are<br />
taken separately to accommodate measures designed to evaluate a student's progress in the course. For our purposes,<br />
these areas can be summarized as: (1) critical reception and critical reflection; (2) critical writing and essay development;<br />
(3) grammar, mechanics, and usage; (4) information literacy; and (5) logical coherence and organization in writing. Some<br />
assignments measure only one of these areas, and others will measure several areas; rubrics for individual assignments<br />
reflect the breakdown of points.<br />
Distribution of Points: Photojournalism Essay Project 5 %<br />
Content Analysis Essay Project 10 %<br />
Argumentative Essay Project 15 %<br />
Group Debate Project 15 % Grading Scale:<br />
Manifesto Essay Project 5 % A 90-100<br />
Final Exam* 10 % B 80-89<br />
Midterm Exam 5 % C 70-79<br />
Blogs/Discussions 15 % D 60-69<br />
Journals/Homework 20 % F 0-68<br />
*<strong>College</strong> Policy: “To receive credit for a course for which you are registered, you must take the final examination.”<br />
Subject to Change: The syllabus is subject to change at my discretion. Notice of any changes will be given via email in Atlas.<br />
<strong>Valencia</strong> <strong>College</strong>'s Core Student Competencies: <strong>Valencia</strong> faculty has defined 4 interrelated competencies (Think, Value,<br />
Communicate, and Act) that prepare students to succeed in the world community. The competencies are outlined in the<br />
<strong>College</strong> Catalog. In this course, through lecture, discussion, group work, and other learning activities, you will further your<br />
mastery of those core areas.<br />
Computer-Based Learning Activity: To demonstrate competence with the basic use of computers this course is designed to<br />
include a formal “computer-based” learning activity.
Late Work: No late work is accepted without my prior permission, which must be given before the original date the<br />
assignment is due. I only make exceptions for reasons involving extenuating circumstances, not for reasons involving things<br />
like neglect, procrastination, or poor communication and planning. When assignments are closed I can not re-open them.<br />
Technological problems at home, and poor planning based on a student’s reliance on connectivity and hardware hosted<br />
off-campus, are not acceptable excuses for late work. If you are unable to complete your assignments on your own<br />
computer and deliver them via Blackboard, I expect you to do so at one of the college's computer labs. Online = via<br />
computer, not necessarily from home.<br />
Extra Credit: Extra credit opportunities are provided throughout the semester, and total points for extra credit is limited to 5.<br />
Make-Up Work: Points awarded during class and for group projects cannot be made up.<br />
Attendance: Regular online engagement, meeting deadlines, and consistent participation are essential to your success in<br />
this course. Missing 3 due dates in a row or failing to log in to the course over a 10-day period are grounds for an instructorinitiated<br />
withdrawal.<br />
Learning With <strong>Valencia</strong> Online: <strong>Valencia</strong> is a leader in the use of alternative delivery in instruction. Students should be<br />
advised that any course may require use of a computer, computer labs, e-mail, the World Wide Web, or other digital<br />
resources and support software, and these requirements are not necessarily in the course schedule. Online, hybrid/blended,<br />
and some Web-enhanced/facilitated courses are delivered in a primarily text-based environment; therefore, reasonably<br />
good reading and writing skills are critical to adequate course participation. Additionally, research has shown that students<br />
who are highly self-directed and manage their time well are more likely to succeed using these delivery methods. Online<br />
courses can be time intensive. Varying keyboard skill rates can impact the amount of time students spend completing<br />
course work online. It is recommended that students carefully evaluate their readiness and abilities in these areas before<br />
selecting distance learning courses. Resources to assist students in determining readiness for online courses may be found at<br />
http://online.valenciacollege.edu.<br />
Student Conduct: Professional behavior is expected. Review <strong>Valencia</strong>'s Code of Conduct, and course rules of netiquette.<br />
Academic Honesty: All forms of academic dishonesty are prohibited at <strong>Valencia</strong>. Academic honesty includes, but is not<br />
limited to, plagiarism, cheating, furnishing false information, forgery, alteration or misuse of documents, misconduct during a<br />
testing situation, and misuse of identification with intent to defraud or deceive. 6Hx28: 8-11 Policy Statement (copied below)<br />
A. All forms of academic dishonesty are prohibited at <strong>Valencia</strong> Community <strong>College</strong>. Academic dishonesty includes, but is<br />
not limited to, acts or attempted acts of plagiarism, cheating, furnishing false information, forgery, alteration or misuse of<br />
documents, misconduct during a testing situation, facilitating academic dishonesty, and misuse of identification with intent<br />
to defraud or deceive. B. All work submitted by students is expected to be the result of the students' individual thoughts,<br />
research, and self-expression. Whenever a student uses ideas, wording, or organization from another source, the source<br />
shall be appropriately acknowledged. C. Students shall take special notice that the assignment of course grades is the<br />
responsibility of the students' individual professor.<br />
Withdrawal Procedure: Per <strong>Valencia</strong> Policy 4-07 (Academic Progress, Course Attendance and Grades, and Withdrawals), a<br />
student who withdraws from class before the established deadline for a particular term will receive a grade of “W.” A<br />
student is not permitted to withdraw after the withdrawal deadline. A faculty member MAY withdraw a student up to the<br />
beginning of the final exam period for violation of the class attendance policy. A student who is withdrawn by faculty for<br />
violation of the class attendance policy will receive a grade of “W.” Any student who withdraws or is withdrawn from a class<br />
during a third or subsequent attempt in the same course will be assigned a grade of “F.” For a complete policy and<br />
procedure overview on <strong>Valencia</strong> Policy 4-07 go to: valenciacollege.edu/generalcounsel/policydetail.cfmRecordID=75.<br />
Students With Disabilities: <strong>Valencia</strong> is committed to ensuring that all of its programs and services are accessible to students<br />
with disabilities. The Office for Students with Disabilities (OSD) determines reasonable and appropriate accommodations for<br />
qualified students with documented disabilities based upon the need and impact of the specific disability. Services may<br />
include, but are not limited to, academic advising, assistance with classroom accommodations, assistance with course<br />
registration, adaptive equipment, training with assistive technology, and referral to campus and community services for<br />
students with disabilities. To inquire about support services, call 407-582-1222.<br />
Learning Support Services: <strong>Valencia</strong> provides a variety of learning support centers for currently-enrolled students. All<br />
students have the opportunity to utilize tutorial assistance, instructional software materials, and many other support<br />
materials. In addition, computer labs are available for use in completing <strong>Valencia</strong> course work. There are several Wi-Fi<br />
hotspot locations for students using their own laptops. For current information on the purposes and operating hours of the<br />
learning support centers on each campus, you may obtain a listing from <strong>Valencia</strong>’s Web site: valenciacollege.edu/labs.<br />
General Classwork Protocol:<br />
- I am committed to the success of my students, so please do not hesitate to speak with me should you be having any issues
or need my assistance. I try my best to help ALL of my students succeed!<br />
- The course consists of several content areas of varying difficulty and length, organized into weeks to fit the temporal<br />
structure of our semester. Each week, I'll provide a list of tasks (usually things to read or watch) and a set of deliverables<br />
(such as journal activities or weblog discussions).<br />
- Delivering your Weekly Content Area Work: All tasks and deliverables assigned (including initial discussion postings) are due<br />
to be submitted on or before 11:59pm on Sundays. Follow-up and responses to initial discussion postings for all content areas<br />
assigned for the week at hand are due to be submitted on or before 11:59pm on Tuesdays. Essay and debate projects are<br />
scheduled separately and due dates don't occur inside these areas.<br />
- The most current version of the schedule appears in a dedicated calendar page in Blackboard, and updates are<br />
maintained there. It is the responsibility of the student to obtain new and updated schedules, and they should be checked<br />
on a weekly basis (I do, however, post an announcement in Blackboard when changes to the calendar are made).<br />
-Any special rubrics and special requirements for assignments will be provided in the handout for each (on my web site).<br />
- I post assignments as soon as is practical, and provide sufficient time to answer questions about requirements, or to<br />
brainstorm and supply ideas or suggestions. Read the assignment handouts thoroughly and carefully. Spend some time to<br />
interpret the task at hand, developing ideas, noting areas you are not clear about or would like additional direction in. Do<br />
not email me with “I don't understand what we are supposed to do.” Understand that the handouts are already written with<br />
this very question in mind. From you, then, I need semi-articulated statements or questions that 1) reflect that you have read<br />
the correct handout, and that 2) give me something to work from specific to your ideas, interests, or concerns. If you're<br />
unsure if you are proceeding in a manner that satisfies the requirements but have no specific questions, or if you just need<br />
confirmation that you are on the right track, put the assignment into your own words, and send this to me.<br />
-I can’t accept work via email. See assignment instructions for any special submission requirements.<br />
- Journal and blog feedback is given on a weekly basis, and only as necessary.<br />
-To receive credit, the content of your blog/discussion or journal posts must appear as text posted to your weblog page,<br />
and not uploaded as an attachment unless otherwise indicated in the post-specific instructions.<br />
- In most cases, course projects are graded within 1 week from due date. I communicate the grade in the feedback area. If<br />
you can’t understand my feedback for any reason, or if would like a detailed or more elaborate explanation, see me and<br />
I’ll be happy to clarify. If there are any specific areas of your work you’d like suggestions on, or any issues you’d like me to<br />
address in my feedback notes, be sure to indicate by noting such requests on a separate cover page.<br />
- I maintain my grade book locally in Excel, but I provide detailed grade ledgers for everyone at 3 points in the semester.<br />
You can also maintain records of your grades and calculate the averages pretty easily on your own.<br />
-Safe Assign detects plagiarism, and all work done for this course is subject to Safe Assign validation. All content submitted<br />
for a grade must be the original work of the individual students or writing teams that are handing it in.<br />
-Essays need to be typed. In-text citations, works cited entries, and page formatting must conform to MLA specs.<br />
- I allow students to rewrite essays awarded a “C” grade or lower. Rewrites must be submitted within a week after receiving<br />
the initial grade. Rewrites typically do not suffer an automatic grade reduction. Automatic reductions occur when the<br />
major instructions are not addressed by the work submitted, or in certain cases involving citation errors (otherwise,<br />
plagiarism automatically results in a 0 grade). If a rewritten essay will receive an automatic penalty, I will indicate this in my<br />
feedback so you'll know this prior to working at it again.<br />
- Over the course of the semester we will frequently have large and small group discussions. All students are expected to<br />
substantially engage in such discussions. It is important that decorum is maintained, and that we remain sensitive to, and<br />
respectful of, the words and opinions of others.<br />
- Debates are semester-long group projects with several components. The audience participates rigorously in debates, and<br />
ultimately determines the “winning side”.<br />
Participant Informed Consent Form: A research study is being conducted to assess college level writing in <strong>ENC</strong><strong>1101</strong>, English<br />
Composition I and <strong>ENC</strong> 1102, English Composition II. Student work will be collected at random from students enrolled in this<br />
course each academic term. Your instructor may be asked to submit a paper that you have written during the course of<br />
the semester. Your identification will be removed from the work so as to preserve your anonymity and confidentiality. The<br />
work will then be holistically scored using a rubric. Those results will be used to improve instruction. You will not be asked to<br />
do anything outside of your normal class assignments. There are no identifiable risks to you. The records of this study will be<br />
kept private. In any sort of report we might publish, we will not include any information that will make it possible to identify<br />
you. Research records will be stored securely and only researchers will have access to the records. All information is subject<br />
to the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA) of 1974, which is designed to protect the privacy of educational<br />
records. Your participation in this study is totally voluntary and you may withdraw at any time without negative<br />
consequences. To withdraw at any time during the study, simply ask your instructor not to submit any of your work.<br />
Please feel free to contact Roberta Brown (407-582-3421) or Kurt Ewen (407-582-3413) or if you have any questions about the<br />
study. Or, for other questions, contact the Chair of <strong>Valencia</strong>’s Institutional Review Board at irb@valenciacollege.edu.I am at<br />
least 18 years of age and not requesting exclusion from the study constitutes my informed consent. You will be given a<br />
copy of this information to keep for your records.
General/Expository Writing Rubrics (category view):<br />
Organization<br />
3- ideas are well-organized and discussion is logically coherent; actual (not merely rhetorical) transitions work to link<br />
elements of the discussion that aren’t “intuitively” linked.<br />
2- semi-organized ideas; generally stays on-topic; reader is rarely required to speculate on relationships between ideas<br />
presented.<br />
1 – lacking organization of ideas; lacking logical coherence; veers off-topic; connections are not made clear.<br />
Development:<br />
3 – complete response; sustained, close engagement with ideas/concepts of the course; substantial, and specific<br />
treatment of subject (through evidence, explanation, or illustration); precision and accuracy in word choice.<br />
2 – substantial response; medium engagement with ideas/concepts of the course; moderate specifics offered; word choice<br />
is generally accurate, and reader is rarely required to interpret meaning.<br />
1- short response; little engagement with ideas/concepts of the course; few specifics given; language is imprecise/unclear<br />
Grammar/Mechanics:<br />
3 – Total or near-absence of grammatical or mechanical errors.<br />
2 – reader is infrequently distracted by errors; few, and moderate errors in grammar or mechanics.<br />
1 – frequent, distracting errors in grammar or mechanics of writing.<br />
Critical Writing (applies to discussions as well):<br />
Holistic Critical Thinking Scoring Rubric – HCTSR, developed by Facione and Facione.<br />
3. - Accurately interprets evidence, statements, graphics, questions, etc.<br />
- Identifies the most important arguments (reasons and claims) pro and con.<br />
- Thoughtfully analyzes and evaluates major alternative points of view.<br />
- Draws warranted, judicious, non-fallacious conclusions.<br />
- Justifies key results and procedures, explains assumptions and reasons.<br />
- Fair-mindedly follows where evidence and reasons lead.<br />
2. - Accurately interprets evidence, statements, graphics, questions, etc.<br />
- Identifies relevant arguments (reasons and claims) pro and con.<br />
- Offers analysis and evaluations of obvious alternative points of view.<br />
- Draws warranted, non-fallacious conclusions.<br />
- Justifies some results or procedures, explains reasons.<br />
- Fair-mindedly follows where evidence and reasons lead.<br />
1. - Offers biased interpretations of evidence, statements, graphics, questions, info., or others' points of view.<br />
- Fails to identify or hastily dismisses strong, relevant counter-arguments.<br />
- Ignores or superficially evaluates obvious alternative points of view.<br />
- Draws unwarranted or fallacious conclusions.<br />
- Argues using fallacious or irrelevant reasons, and unwarranted claims.<br />
- Does not justify results or procedures, nor explain reasons.<br />
- Regardless of the evidence or reasons, maintains or defends views based on self-interest or preconceptions.<br />
- Exhibits close-mindedness or hostility to reason.
<strong>ENC</strong> <strong>1101</strong><br />
Lk. Nona - Online<br />
Wk #: Wk Ending: Items Due From You: Wk #:<br />
1 09/04/11 All Week 1 Deliverables Due 1<br />
2 09/11/11 All Week 2 Deliverables Due 2<br />
Pre-Debate Questions Due<br />
3 09/18/11 All Week 3 Deliverables Due 3<br />
Photojournalism Essay Due<br />
4 09/25/11 All Week 4 Deliverables Due 4<br />
Content Analysis Pre-Project Questions due<br />
5 10/02/11 All Week 5 Deliverables Due 5<br />
Manifesto Essay Due<br />
6 10/09/11 All Week 6 Deliverables Due 6<br />
Content Analysis Pre-Research Questions due<br />
7 10/16/11 All Week 7 Deliverables Due 7<br />
1 st Constructive Group Debates Due<br />
8 10/23/11 All Week 8 Deliverables Due 8<br />
2 nd Constructive Group Debates Due<br />
9 10/30/11 All Week 9 Deliverables Due 9<br />
1 st Rebuttal Group Debates Due<br />
10 11/06/11 All Week 10 Deliverables Due 10<br />
2 nd Rebuttal Group Debates Due<br />
11 11/13/11 All Week 11 Deliverables Due 11<br />
12 11/20/11 All Week 12 Deliverables Due 12<br />
Argumentative Essay Rough Draft Due<br />
13 11/27/11 break 13<br />
14 12/04/11 All Week 14 Deliverables Due 14<br />
Content Analysis Essay Project Due<br />
15 12/11/11 All Week 15 Deliverables Due 15<br />
Argumentative Essay Due<br />
Final Exam Due at 11:59pm on 12/15