23.07.2014 Views

Untitled - Springer Publishing

Untitled - Springer Publishing

Untitled - Springer Publishing

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

INTRODUCTION<br />

what is emotionally intelligent depends on the context—and<br />

laboratory studies may not adequately capture the social and<br />

emotional contexts of real life. At the same time, we see limited<br />

prospects for a scientific account of EI arising from idiographic<br />

methods, which requires a systematic comparison of both test<br />

scores and emotional functioning across individuals (Zeidner,<br />

Roberts, & Matthews, 2004). We may also note that artists may<br />

possess a rather special type of EI. Whatever their gifts in understanding<br />

and communicating emotion, artists and writers tend<br />

to show elevated levels of abnormal personality traits (Batey &<br />

Furnham, 2006).<br />

Strategies for Theory Building<br />

We have spent some time talking about the measurement of<br />

EI and the obstacles that occur because of its fundamental<br />

importance. We will take rather less space to discuss theoretical<br />

issues, because there is a lack of theory-driven research on EI.<br />

The imbalance in research effort in part reflects the recency of<br />

EI as a topic area, and, naturally enough, researchers have been<br />

more preoccupied with how to assess this new construct than<br />

with finer points of theory. However, psychological testing is<br />

of limited use in the absence of a theoretical understanding of<br />

what the test scores actually mean. Here, we will briefly set out<br />

some of the directions for future theories of EI.<br />

We need first to get a rough sense of what a theory of EI<br />

would look like. We need to be clear that descriptive schemes<br />

of the types set out in Tables 1.1 and 1.2 are not theories. A theory<br />

sets out to explain or account for observed phenomena,<br />

frequently by specifying cause-and-effect relationships, for<br />

example, how an abnormality of the neurons within a brain system<br />

for emotion produces unusual behaviors in an emotional<br />

situation. Lists of qualities or functions are theoretically ambiguous—that<br />

is, there are a variety of ways in which we could<br />

explain individual differences in emotional functioning. For<br />

example, what makes a person good at “emotion perception”?<br />

23<br />

Matthews_PTR_Ch 01_12-10-11_1-42.indd 23<br />

10/12/2011 10:46:54 AM

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!