4 Comparison of the ALMA and Herschel - ESO
4 Comparison of the ALMA and Herschel - ESO
4 Comparison of the ALMA and Herschel - ESO
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Figure 6: A three-dimensional plot <strong>of</strong> frequency, angular resolution <strong>and</strong> resolution for <strong>the</strong> instruments<br />
compared in Fig. 5.<br />
From Fig. 6, we see that <strong>Herschel</strong> HIFI approaches <strong>the</strong> velocity resolution capable with<br />
<strong>ALMA</strong>, while for all o<strong>the</strong>r instruments, <strong>the</strong> velocity resolutions are much lower.<br />
4.2 <strong>Comparison</strong>s <strong>of</strong> Observational Techniques<br />
4.2.1 Broadb<strong>and</strong> Measurements<br />
<strong>ALMA</strong> will have a much larger collecting area than <strong>Herschel</strong>. However, at specific<br />
frequencies, usually near water vapour lines, <strong>the</strong> Earth’s atmosphere attenuates signals,<br />
perhaps completely blocking <strong>the</strong>se. For <strong>the</strong> SPIRE bolometer array, <strong>the</strong>re is a significant<br />
overlap with <strong>ALMA</strong> receiver b<strong>and</strong>s 8 to 10. The PACS bolometer array provides shorter<br />
wavelength data needed to determine SEDs. In Fig. 7 we show <strong>the</strong> coverage on a spectrum<br />
<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> starburst galaxy M82 for different redshifts.<br />
14