05.08.2014 Views

4 Comparison of the ALMA and Herschel - ESO

4 Comparison of the ALMA and Herschel - ESO

4 Comparison of the ALMA and Herschel - ESO

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

DRSP 4.1.3, Chemistry in <strong>the</strong> atmospheres <strong>of</strong> Venus <strong>and</strong> Mars, is a proposal to search for <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong>n<br />

image mm/sub-mm spectral lines <strong>of</strong> molecules such as SO 2<br />

, H 2<br />

S, HCl, 16 O 18 O, H 2<br />

CO, H 2<br />

O 2<br />

<strong>and</strong><br />

NO. This will require 92 hours, <strong>and</strong> should be repeated two years later for <strong>the</strong> purpose <strong>of</strong> monitoring.<br />

There is an additional DRSP, 4.1.2, to study HDO from Mars. In DRSP 4.1.4, it is proposed<br />

to study <strong>the</strong> stratospheres <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> giant planets in lines <strong>of</strong> CO, HCN, CS, HC 3<br />

N <strong>and</strong> HDO. There<br />

would also be blind searches; in all, this would require 154 hours. In DRSP contribution 4.1.8,<br />

it is proposed to measure <strong>the</strong> atmospheres <strong>of</strong> Triton <strong>and</strong> Pluto in spectral lines, <strong>and</strong> DRSP 4.2.1<br />

proposes to study <strong>the</strong> albedos sizes <strong>and</strong> surface properties <strong>of</strong> transneptunian objects.<br />

6.9.4 Modelling <strong>and</strong> Analysis <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Data<br />

The data sets that will be produced by <strong>ALMA</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Herschel</strong> will be so large that <strong>the</strong> analysis<br />

<strong>and</strong> comparisons with models will have to be streamlined <strong>and</strong> automated as much as possible.<br />

Various groups around <strong>the</strong> world have started to address this issue <strong>and</strong> substantial<br />

progress is being made.<br />

For molecular clouds, chemical abundances <strong>and</strong> physical parameters have been derived<br />

traditionally using simple tools, such as rotation diagrams assuming a constant excitation<br />

temperature T ex<br />

or statistical equilibrium calculations using an escape probability approximation<br />

model for a single temperature, T, <strong>and</strong> density, n. In both cases, comparison with a<br />

“st<strong>and</strong>ard” molecule such as CO is needed to derive <strong>the</strong> abundance with respect to H 2<br />

. It is<br />

well-known that this method can lead to abundances that are in error by more than an order<br />

<strong>of</strong> magnitude. For example, <strong>the</strong> use <strong>of</strong> n = 10 5 versus 10 6 cm -3 for <strong>the</strong> interpretation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

HCN J = 4-3 line with a critical density, n*, <strong>of</strong> ~10 7 cm -3 gives a factor <strong>of</strong> 10 difference in<br />

derived HCN abundance. Densities are known to range from 10 4 to >10 7 cm -3 across starforming<br />

regions. Also <strong>the</strong> neglect <strong>of</strong> beam dilution <strong>and</strong> optical depth effects can result in<br />

large errors. For example, <strong>the</strong> emission from <strong>the</strong> complex organic molecules may originate<br />

in a region <strong>of</strong> only 1”, much smaller than <strong>the</strong> observational single-dish beam <strong>of</strong> >15” which<br />

applies to <strong>the</strong> more extended CO.<br />

42

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!