4 Comparison of the ALMA and Herschel - ESO

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Figure 8: A plot of the Herschel HIFI receiver bands (above the plot) and ALMA receiver bands 8, 9 and 10. The irregular curve below the bands is the transmission at the zenith, as obtained from the data of Serabyn et al. (1998) for Mauna Kea. With the inclusion of the contributions from Japan to ALMA, it will be possible to measure the same spectral lines in ALMA Bands 8, 9 and 10 and Herschel HIFI Bands 1 and 2 (see Fig. 8). In Table 7, we give a list of some of the spectral lines common to both instruments. In addition, there are thousands of spectral lines of methanol, CH 3 OH, methyl cyanide, CH 3 CN, sulphur monoxide, SO, and sulphur dioxide, SO 2 common to both instruments. For each spectral line, we give the quantum numbers of the transitions and line frequencies. We also give the atmospheric transmission for a 5 km high site with 0.5 mm of precipitable water (this is scaled to 5 km elevation from http://www.submm.caltech.edu/cso/weather/ atplot.shtml). 16
Table 7: Frequencies, Assignments & Estimated Atmospheric Transmission where ALMA and Herschel HIFI Receiver Bands Overlap Molecule or Atom Transition Energy of Lower Level (K) Frequency (GHz) Transmission (percent) ALMA Band 8: CS J = 10-9 106 489.8 37.1 CI 3 P 1 - 3 P 0 0 492.2 51.8 NH 2 D J KaKc = 4 13 -4 14 152 494.4 54.3 HDO J KaKc = 1 10 -1 01 22 509.3 38.9 ALMA Band 9: HDO J KaKc = 2 11 -2 02 66 599.9 21.7 D 2 O J KaKc = 3 03 -1 11 26 607.4 30.2 HCO + J = 7-6 90 624.4 21.3 SiH J F = (3/2) 1 -(1/2) 1 0 624.9,627.7 24.9,36.5 H 37 Cl J = 1-0 0 625.0,625.9 25.5,30.6 DF J = 1-0 0 651.1 51.1 13 CO J = 6-5 79 661.0 53.9 D 2 H + 690 49.9 CO J = 6-5 83 691.5 48.1 ALMA Band 10: CO J = 7-6 116 806.6 39.2 CI 3 P 2 - 3 P 1 24 809.3 40.6 H 2 CO J KaKc = 12 0,11 -11 0,11 228 855.2 48.9 13 CO J = 8-7 148 898.0 40.6 HDO J KaKc = 1 11 -0 00 0 893.6 40.1 LiH J = 2-1 21 887.3 34.0 H 2 CO J KaKc = 12 1,11 -11 1,10 249 896.7 40.5 D 2 O J KaKc = 2 12 -1 01 17 897.9 40.6 17
Page 3 and 4: Report by the ESA-ESO Working Group
Page 5 and 6: Contents 1 Executive Summary ......
Page 9 and 10: 1 Executive Summary The Herschel Sa
Page 11 and 12: 2 Introduction The Herschel satelli
Page 13 and 14: 3 Descriptions of Herschel and ALMA
Page 15 and 16: Table 1: ALMA Antenna Arrays and Co
Page 17 and 18: 3.2 Herschel Herschel is a cornerst
Page 19: Table 6: Some Characteristics of th
Page 22 and 23: Figure 6: A three-dimensional plot
Page 27 and 28: 5 Common Calibration of ALMA and He
Page 29 and 30: 6 Specific Examples of Synergies Be
Page 31 and 32: 6.3 High Redshift Objects During th
Page 33 and 34: eview) have also revealed a new cla
Page 35 and 36: In addition to emission lines from
Page 37 and 38: y interactions. Consider the nearby
Page 39 and 40: Figure 12: Data for IC10. The integ
Page 41 and 42: matter interacts with the powerful
Page 43 and 44: In DRSP contribution 2.1.2, Kinetic
Page 45 and 46: The Orion KL region is one of the n
Page 47 and 48: degrees. The GLIMPSE survey is bein
Page 49 and 50: An example is DRSP contribution 3.3
Page 51 and 52: Figure 18: A schematic of the analy
Page 53: 7 Summary The PACS and SPIRE bolome
Page 56 and 57: The full ALMA will be in operation
Page 58 and 59: calibration files and to a pipeline
Page 60 and 61: SWAS — Submillimeter Wave Astrono
Page 62 and 63: Falgarone, E., Hily-Blant, P., Pine
Page 64: Wilson, C. D., 2005 in Proc. of The

4 Comparison of the ALMA and Herschel - ESO

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?