Small size - large impact - Nanowerk
Small size - large impact - Nanowerk
Small size - large impact - Nanowerk
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Annabelle Hett is a risk<br />
expert in charge of Swiss Re’s<br />
risk perception system “SONAR”<br />
20<br />
Conclusion<br />
Annabelle Hett<br />
To reduce uncertainties and ensure a sustainable introduction of the technology, efforts<br />
clearly must be made to establish a common discussion platform facilitating an open<br />
dialogue on risk analysis, risk management and options for acceptable risk transfer.<br />
Our two-day nanotechnology conference at Swiss Re’s Centre for Global Dialogue in<br />
Rüschlikon offered an overview of the topic and addressed a broad scope of potential<br />
risks and inherent opportunities. One concrete result of the meeting was that for as<br />
many stakeholders represented – participants from science, business, the insurance<br />
sector, and regulatory bodies – there were fundamentally different perceptions of<br />
nanotechnology as a potential risk. Clearly, it is up to these very stakeholders to decide<br />
how to minimise those gaps in perception. Doing so will not be without its challenges,<br />
however: the risk perception environment is increasingly complex and demanding, and<br />
our information age gives ample room and channels to many voices.<br />
As the nanotechnology conference organiser, I also took the following key messages from<br />
our early December meeting; as concerns nanotechnology: specifying standards and<br />
nomenclature is a foremost priority; stakeholder groups must define and communicate their<br />
concrete requirements more effectively; more risk research is urgently needed so as to lay<br />
a sound, objective basis for discussion, and stakeholders need to find a common ground<br />
to benefit from that exchange; the experts were concerned as much with the concept of<br />
“phantom” risk – where no scientifically demonstrable cause-effect relationship can be<br />
established as yet – as they were with potential “real” risk, and for that reason, they weighed<br />
the importance of risk communication heavily; the public’s fear should be taken seriously,<br />
and the public must be included in the dialogue to a greater extent to build trust.<br />
In conclusion, I wish to thank all the speakers for their valuable contributions. I look<br />
forward to an ongoing dialogue on this topic, which will have a tremendous <strong>impact</strong><br />
on society and our future risk landscape. In the meantime, if this first conference<br />
9on nanotechnology organised by Swiss Re helped in some way to effectively foster<br />
exchange among the stakeholders, we can all join in counting it a success.<br />
65