29.08.2014 Views

Small size - large impact - Nanowerk

Small size - large impact - Nanowerk

Small size - large impact - Nanowerk

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Annabelle Hett is a risk<br />

expert in charge of Swiss Re’s<br />

risk perception system “SONAR”<br />

20<br />

Conclusion<br />

Annabelle Hett<br />

To reduce uncertainties and ensure a sustainable introduction of the technology, efforts<br />

clearly must be made to establish a common discussion platform facilitating an open<br />

dialogue on risk analysis, risk management and options for acceptable risk transfer.<br />

Our two-day nanotechnology conference at Swiss Re’s Centre for Global Dialogue in<br />

Rüschlikon offered an overview of the topic and addressed a broad scope of potential<br />

risks and inherent opportunities. One concrete result of the meeting was that for as<br />

many stakeholders represented – participants from science, business, the insurance<br />

sector, and regulatory bodies – there were fundamentally different perceptions of<br />

nanotechnology as a potential risk. Clearly, it is up to these very stakeholders to decide<br />

how to minimise those gaps in perception. Doing so will not be without its challenges,<br />

however: the risk perception environment is increasingly complex and demanding, and<br />

our information age gives ample room and channels to many voices.<br />

As the nanotechnology conference organiser, I also took the following key messages from<br />

our early December meeting; as concerns nanotechnology: specifying standards and<br />

nomenclature is a foremost priority; stakeholder groups must define and communicate their<br />

concrete requirements more effectively; more risk research is urgently needed so as to lay<br />

a sound, objective basis for discussion, and stakeholders need to find a common ground<br />

to benefit from that exchange; the experts were concerned as much with the concept of<br />

“phantom” risk – where no scientifically demonstrable cause-effect relationship can be<br />

established as yet – as they were with potential “real” risk, and for that reason, they weighed<br />

the importance of risk communication heavily; the public’s fear should be taken seriously,<br />

and the public must be included in the dialogue to a greater extent to build trust.<br />

In conclusion, I wish to thank all the speakers for their valuable contributions. I look<br />

forward to an ongoing dialogue on this topic, which will have a tremendous <strong>impact</strong><br />

on society and our future risk landscape. In the meantime, if this first conference<br />

9on nanotechnology organised by Swiss Re helped in some way to effectively foster<br />

exchange among the stakeholders, we can all join in counting it a success.<br />

65

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!