29.08.2014 Views

Small size - large impact - Nanowerk

Small size - large impact - Nanowerk

Small size - large impact - Nanowerk

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

The American and<br />

Japanese perspectives<br />

Phillip J. Bond is Under<br />

Secretary of Commerce for<br />

Technology, United States<br />

of America<br />

Opposite:<br />

Southeastern United States<br />

10 +6<br />

1,000 kilometers<br />

2<br />

Responsible nanotechnology<br />

development<br />

Phillip J. Bond<br />

Dawn has broken on the Age of Nanotechnology. Sustained global investments by<br />

governments and private companies around the world are already beginning to deliver<br />

on the economic and societal promise of nanotechnology. In the near term, nanotechnology<br />

is likely to deliver evolutionary advances in existing products and processes; in the longer<br />

term, nanotechnology is likely to deliver revolutionary advances – amazing, economydisrupting,<br />

life-changing advances – across a broad swath of industries.<br />

Anything revolutionary is unnerving to some. And so, as with other technologies<br />

throughout history, some have responded with a call for a slowdown or outright<br />

moratorium on nanotechnology research and commercialization. To those who advocate<br />

such a position, I have three messages:<br />

First, nanotechnology is coming, and it won’t be stopped. The economic promise, the<br />

societal potential, and the human desire for knowledge are forces that cannot be held<br />

back. Across the globe, research is underway. Wealthy and developing nations alike are<br />

investing more each year to reap the economic and societal rewards of nanotechnology.<br />

With this level of investment, nano-based innovation is inevitable.<br />

Second, given nanotechnology’s extraordinary economic and societal potential, it<br />

would be unethical, in my view, to attempt to halt scientific and technological progress<br />

in nanotechnology. Nanotechnology offers the potential for improving people’s standard<br />

of living, healthcare, and nutrition; reducing or even eliminating pollution through<br />

clean production technologies; repairing existing environmental damage; feeding the<br />

world’s hungry; enabling the blind to see and deaf to hear; eradicating diseases and<br />

offering protection against harmful bacteria and viruses; and even extending the length<br />

and the quality of life through the repair or replacement of failing organs. Given this<br />

fantastic potential, how can our attempt to harness nanotechnology’s power at the<br />

earliest opportunity – to alleviate so many earthly ills – be anything other than ethical?<br />

7

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!