30.08.2014 Views

geographia - Studia

geographia - Studia

geographia - Studia

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

ANDREA GÁL<br />

The main purpose of this study is to present a new typology from the point of view<br />

of the morphology and internal structure of mud volcanoes from the studied area. As a starting<br />

point, Bányai’s classification (1932) was used, which takes into account the morphology and<br />

some (supposed) internal aspects of mud volcanoes distinguishing four types: “bottomless mud<br />

pits” (selymék), “maybug” (bogárhátas), “stack” (boglya), “white mud mounds” (fehérszék).<br />

32<br />

2. METHODS AND CRITERIA OF THE CLASSIFICATION<br />

The studied mud volcanoes have been analyzed directly on the field from the point<br />

of view of morphology, morphometry, evolution (in cases when they have been observed<br />

several times) and the characteristics of the discharged material. The manual shallow<br />

drillings provided not only the samples but useful information regarding the internal<br />

structure. Using this information, the drilling profiles have been drawn up leading to the<br />

establishment of a new classification.<br />

The following criteria have been taken into consideration in the new typology:<br />

external morphology, morphometric elements, internal structure, intensity of activity,<br />

characteristics of the discharged material, the presence of vegetation (total, partial and lack<br />

of vegetation) and if the mud volcano has appeared on a flat or sloping surface.<br />

As far as the surface morphology is concerned, the shape of the mud volcanoes has<br />

been analyzed: flat, cone, truncated cone, dome, and the curve which describes the best the<br />

respective form. The outline curves have been drawn on the basis of the photographs and<br />

the morphometric information. Regarding the subsurface morphology, the form and<br />

dimensions of the feeding channel and the presence or lack of near-surface mud chambers<br />

have been examined.<br />

Five intensity levels have been defined: 1. active mud discharge and/or bubbling<br />

of gas, 2. fresh mud without active discharge (in the case of positive shapes) and bubbling<br />

mud not covered by vegetation (in the case of negative forms) 3. mud volcanoes covered by<br />

vegetation which can be reactivated if the vegetation which blocks the vent is removed 4.<br />

covered by vegetation which can’t be reactivated, but quakes under one’s feet 5. inactive,<br />

with no signs of activity, only the shape or the references in bibliography alludes to the<br />

existence of a mud volcano.<br />

3. CLASSIFICATION OF MUD VOLCANOES<br />

After studying all the 60 mud volcanic features, despite of the diversity in surface<br />

expressions (shape and activity), some characteristic features have been recognized in<br />

morphology and evolution which allow us to establish a new classification. We propose to<br />

separate four types: gryphon, mud mound, mud crater and mud pool.<br />

3. 1. Gryphon<br />

The term gryphon has been defined by Kopf (2002) as a small cone (up to 3 m) off the<br />

crest or on the flank of a large mud volcano. In this study the term gryphon is used in a similar<br />

meaning, with the difference that it will not denote a secondary feature (the ramification of<br />

the main conduit) but the mud volcano itself.<br />

Gryphons are represented by those positive mud volcanic features which result<br />

from the deposition of mudflows extruded through a narrow feeder channel on the preexisting<br />

topographic surface. The gryphon is built predominantly by the addition of material to the

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!