PY 2013 Action Plan - Draft - Tarrant County

More documents

Recommendations

Info

AP‐50 Geographic Distribution Description of the geographic areas of the entitlement (including areas of low‐income and minority concentration) where assistance will be directed This Action Plan is submitted in accordance with 24 CFR 91.220 as part of the Consolidated Planning process required of entitlement jurisdictions under certain programs operated by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. Tarrant County is an “urban county entitlement” comprised of a 29‐city consortium for 2012‐2014. The following cities form the consortium: Azle, Bedford, Benbrook, Blue Mound, Burleson, Crowley, Dalworthington Gardens, Euless, Everman, Forest Hill, Grapevine, Haltom City, Haslet, Hurst, Keller, Kennedale, Lakeside, Lake Worth, Mansfield, North Richland Hills, Pantego, Richland Hills, River Oaks, Saginaw, Sansom Park, Southlake, Watauga, Westworth Village, and White Settlement. The 2012‐2014 urban county automatic renewal recertification process began in April 2011. Renewal of 2015‐2017 urban county re‐certifications will occur again in April 2014. All low/moderate area benefit activities for PY 2013 are based on the 2000 U.S. Census data or approved surveys. Nineteen cities and 4 entitlement cities under Tarrant County’s supervision of funding have submitted proposals for CDBG funds to low/moderate areas or towards persons in the limited clientele category. Income surveys were conducted in the City of Haslet, City of Mansfield and City of North Rochland Hills in the 2012 Program Year. City of Haslet and City of Mansfield had qualified surveys and were approved by HUD as low/moderate areas with at least 51% low moderate income persons. Surveys that did not meet qualification were the ones executed in the City of North Richland Hills. Geographic Distribution Target Area Percentage of Funds Table 5 ‐ Geographic Distribution Rationale for the priorities for allocating investments geographically For CDBG funding of public infrastructure; Of the nineteen cities and 4 entitlement cities under Tarrant County’s supervision of funding that have submitted proposals for CDBG funds for PY2013, 9 cities and 4 entitlement cities will have public infrastructure and ADA barrier removal projects in their cities. In PY2012, Tarrant County anticipated a cut in which CDBG would not be able to fund all cities that submit an eligible public infrastructure project. In PY2013, we are implementing a spilt of cities into two groups where by each group would alternate the allocation of funding. The groups were split based on weight of annual activities, the county precinct the city is in and the geographic groupings of cities. Entitlement cities will receive funding annually, non entitlement cities that are part of the HOME consortium that have eligible projects will be funded according to their group. For HOME and ESG funds, all areas and cities within Tarrant County, but outside of cities of Arlington, Annual Action Plan 2013 22 OMB Control No: 2506‐0117 (exp. 07/31/2015)
Fort Worth and Grand Prairie will be eligible for funding based on qualifications for respective programs. The other cities listed receive their own HUD funds and are HUD entitlement cities that manage their own programs. Discussion Annual Action Plan 2013 23 OMB Control No: 2506‐0117 (exp. 07/31/2015)
Page 1 and 2: Annual Action Plan 2013 1 OMB Contr
Page 3 and 4: qualification within the City of Eu
Page 5 and 6: distributed through the Tarrant Cou
Page 7 and 8: PR‐05 Lead & Responsible Agencies
Page 9 and 10: Describe coordination with the Cont
Page 11 and 12: As CoC Lead, the Tarrant County Hom
Page 13 and 14: Table 4 - Citizen Participation Out
Page 15 and 16: Program Source of Funds CDBG public
Page 17 and 18: Annual Goals and Objectives AP‐20
Page 19 and 20: or have disabilities will mainly be
Page 21: AP‐35 Projects Introduction Tarra
Page 25 and 26: AP‐60 Public Housing Introduction
Page 27 and 28: AP‐65 Homeless and Other Special
Page 29 and 30: assistance from public or private a
Page 31 and 32: AP‐85 Other Actions Introduction
Page 33 and 34: improvements to public and assisted
Page 35 and 36: HOME Investment Partnership Program
Page 37: steps to ensure citizen participati

PY 2013 Action Plan - Draft - Tarrant County

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?