01.11.2012 Views

World Congress of Brachytherapy 10-12 May, 2012 - Estro-events.org

World Congress of Brachytherapy 10-12 May, 2012 - Estro-events.org

World Congress of Brachytherapy 10-12 May, 2012 - Estro-events.org

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

S32 <strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong><br />

: The obtained results show that the proposed detector is<br />

suitable for in vivo realtime dosimetry in high dose rate<br />

brachytherapy. Further studies are currently in progress for the<br />

application <strong>of</strong> this dosimeter in urethral dose measurements during<br />

interstitial brachytherapy treatments <strong>of</strong> the prostate.<br />

<br />

<br />

79<br />

PERMANENT PERINEAL IMPLANT (PPI) SALVAGE OF PPI FAILURES: IS<br />

LESS MORE IN HIGHLY SELECTED PATIENTS<br />

M. Roach<br />

Department <strong>of</strong> Radiation Oncology UCSF, San Francisco, CA, USA<br />

Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA,<br />

USA<br />

It has been estimated that 15 to 75% <strong>of</strong> men treated with radiotherapy<br />

(RT) will fail biochemically (Agarwal et al, Cancer 2008; <strong>12</strong>30714).<br />

Specifically given the outcomes <strong>of</strong> series reported by experienced<br />

Practitioners upwards <strong>of</strong> 30% <strong>of</strong> men undergoing permanent perineal<br />

implants (PPI) for prostate cancer fail within <strong>10</strong> years. Thus it is likely<br />

that failure rates are higher in the community where less experienced<br />

physicians. Based on a “back <strong>of</strong> the envelope” calculation I would<br />

estimate that it is likely that well over <strong>10</strong>0,000 men who have<br />

undergone are experiencing a rising PSA after PPI in the USA alone.<br />

Among the men with rising PSAs post PPI some are failing distantly<br />

and some locally. Given the typical selection criteria and the<br />

likelihood <strong>of</strong> poor quality implants in the community performed by<br />

low volume practitioners it seem probable that at least as many <strong>of</strong><br />

these recurrences are local as occurs after a radical prostatectomy<br />

(RP). Since the vast majority <strong>of</strong> men undergoing salvage external<br />

beam radiation (EBRT) after RP respond, it is also likely that a<br />

relatively large number <strong>of</strong> men failing PPIs might benefit from<br />

additional local treatment.<br />

Currently nearly 95% <strong>of</strong> men failing any form <strong>of</strong> RT are managed with<br />

androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) (Agarwal et al, Cancer 2008; <strong>12</strong><br />

30714). Unfortunately this is not a curative intervention and it is<br />

associated with a host <strong>of</strong> side effects. Previous series have<br />

documented suboptimal control rates and significant morbidity when<br />

PPI salvage has been attempted (Moman et al. <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 9: 119<br />

25, 20<strong>10</strong>, Nguyen et al. Cancer 1<strong>10</strong>:1485 92, 2007 and Nguyen et al.<br />

<strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 8:34552, 2009). However these series tended to treat<br />

the entire gland to near full doses. Of note however, most clinically<br />

significant local recurrences after RT appear to occur at the initial<br />

site <strong>of</strong> the primary tumor (Pucar et al. IJROBP 69: 629, 2007). Thus<br />

subsets <strong>of</strong> patients who are failing locally can be identified who might<br />

be candidates for local therapy.<br />

At UCSF we assessed feasibility <strong>of</strong> MRplanned focal partial prostate<br />

salvage PPI (psPPI).
Our hypothesis going into this intervention was<br />

based on several principles:<br />

If the seeds were not distributed as planned but they were placed into<br />

the prostate then we did not have to worry about cold spots<br />

elsewhere and there was not need to retreat previously treated areas.<br />

Patients who had limited disease to start out with who appeared to<br />

have recurred in sites <strong>of</strong> previous disease where ideally suited for<br />

psPPI.<br />

An otherwise negative multiparametric MRI, supported by a care set<br />

<strong>of</strong> biopsies combined with #2 above set the criteria for the ideal<br />

patient for psPPI.<br />

Most importantly, develop a strategy that maximized the chances that<br />

our treatment would “at least do no harm”. To this end composite<br />

plans combining the previous dose distribution and “salvage plan” had<br />

to be “safe”.<br />

The potential types <strong>of</strong> patients who might be considered for salvage<br />

local therapies are shown diagrammatically in Figure 1. The typical<br />

patients we at UCSF selected for psPPI belong to categories 3 and 4 as<br />

shown in Figure 1 below.<br />

From 20032009, fifteen patients without metastases underwent<br />

MRI/MRS to identify coincident areas <strong>of</strong> recurrence following iPPI<br />

(N=14 I <strong>12</strong>5, 144Gy, N=1 Pd<strong>10</strong>3, <strong>12</strong>5Gy) underdosage in preparation<br />

for possible psPPI (without hormone therapy). For the psPPI planning<br />

the mean D90 CTV (focal recurrent disease) was set at 142Gy resulting<br />

in a whole prostate gland doses <strong>of</strong> 37Gy and a mean V<strong>10</strong>0 rectum <strong>of</strong><br />

0.5% (0.07cc) and urethra dose <strong>of</strong> <strong>12</strong>% (0.3cc).<br />

Although the followup definition following psPPI for PSA failure was<br />

chosen as the Phoenix Definition (PSAF = nadir + 2.0) or the first<br />

ASTRO definition (ASTROPSAF = three consecutive rises) we expected<br />

substantially lower values to be reflective <strong>of</strong> success. Toxicity was<br />

scored using CTCAE v4.0.<br />

At psPPI the median age was 68, and the median PSA=3.5ng/mL<br />

(range:0.9 5.6 ng/mL). Most patients (71%) had Gleason Score 6 or<br />

less but 39% had Gleason Scores <strong>of</strong> ≥7. Only 40% had abnormal MRI/S<br />

with one (80%) or two (20%) abnormal foci. The median interval<br />

between iPPI and psPPI was 69mos (range 28132).<br />

At median followup <strong>of</strong> 23.3mos (range 888), two patients (13%)<br />

failed biochemically at 26 and 35mos however both underwent a<br />

second psPPI with followup PSA at 11.7 and 26.4 mos <strong>of</strong> 0.6 and<br />

0.7ng/mL, respectively. Counting these two patients as failure the<br />

ASTROPFS at 1, 2 and 3 years was 86.7%, 78.4%, and 62.7% with 5<br />

failures (N=3 with negative TRUSbiopsy). In contrast, the PhoenixPFS<br />

at 1, 2, and 3years were <strong>10</strong>0%, <strong>10</strong>0%, and 71.4%. psPPI PSA<br />

nadir <strong>12</strong> months is associated<br />

with a low risk <strong>of</strong> systemic progression and 92% remain metastasis<br />

free at 5 years.<br />

Surgical technique<br />

Nowadays with most patients undergoing EBRT, perineal low or high<br />

dose brachytherapy the standard retropubic approach is preferred for<br />

salvage RPE. Depending on the type <strong>of</strong> radiation technique there are<br />

different anatomical areas in which the surgical procedure might be<br />

complicated (table 1) and deserves specific experience.<br />

Complications: Rectal injury has been described in 6% to 19% <strong>of</strong><br />

patients in former series whereas it is reported in only 25% <strong>of</strong><br />

patients in modern series.<br />

Anastomotic strictures occur more frequently in 832%<br />

The incidence if urinary stress incontinence is higher than in series <strong>of</strong><br />

primary RPE. Complete continence can be achieved in about 50%,<br />

another 20% to 30% require only 1 pad per day. The radiation<br />

technique used appears to be associated with the frequency <strong>of</strong><br />

incontinence: in the author’s experience a high continence rate <strong>of</strong><br />

90% could be achieved in patients having undergone LDR<br />

brachytherapy.<br />

Cancer control following SRP<br />

The 5year progressionfree rates have improved and the results are<br />

similar to those <strong>of</strong> standard RPE in cases <strong>of</strong> similar pathological<br />

stages. The <strong>10</strong>year cancer specific and overall survival rates are in<br />

the range <strong>of</strong> 70% to 75% and 60% to 66% in contemporary series. In<br />

most contemporary series, <strong>org</strong>anconfined disease, negative surgical<br />

margins and the absence <strong>of</strong> seminal vesicle and/or lymph node<br />

metastases are favourable prognosticators associated with a better<br />

diseasefree survival <strong>of</strong> approximately 7080%.<br />

: With the advantage <strong>of</strong> PSA screening at regular followup<br />

intervalls following RT, most local failures will be detected by an<br />

asymptomatic PSA increase. Patients with PSA levels < <strong>10</strong> ng/ml, no<br />

palpable disease, negative findings on CT and bone scans are most<br />

suitable candidates for SRP. Contemporary series <strong>of</strong> SRP demonstrate<br />

excellent local control, good longterm cancer specific survival rates,<br />

minimal complication rates and a good health related quality <strong>of</strong> life.<br />

SRP represents the therapeutic option if choice in well selected<br />

patients with locally recurrent PCA preventing significant local<br />

complications. Based on our most recent findings on 117 patients SRP<br />

should only be performed at tertiary referral centres with an<br />

extensive experience not only in radical prostatectomy but especially<br />

in salvage surgery.<br />

<br />

OC81<br />

A MULTICENTRE COMPARISON OF INTER AND INTRAFRACTIONAL<br />

ORGAN MOVEMENT IN CERVIX CANCER BT AND ITS DOSIMETRIC IMPACT<br />

N. Nesvacil 1 , K. Tanderup 2 , T. PaulsenHellebust 3 , A. De Leeuw 4 ,<br />

C. Anderson 5 , S. Mohamed 2 , R. Pötter 6 , C. Kirisits 6<br />

1<br />

Medical University <strong>of</strong> Vienna, Department <strong>of</strong> Radiotherapy and<br />

Oncology Comprehensive Cancer Center, Vienna, Austria<br />

2<br />

Aarhus University Hospital, Department <strong>of</strong> Oncology, Aarhus,<br />

Denmark<br />

3<br />

Oslo University Hospital, Department <strong>of</strong> Medical Physics Division <strong>of</strong><br />

Cancer and Surgery, Oslo, Norway<br />

4<br />

University Medical Center Utrecht, Department <strong>of</strong> Radiation<br />

Oncology, Utrecht, The Netherlands<br />

5<br />

Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Clinical Physics Department,<br />

Northwood Middlesex, United Kingdom<br />

6<br />

Medical University <strong>of</strong> Vienna, Department <strong>of</strong> Radiotherapy and<br />

Oncology Comprehensive Cancer Center & Christian Doppler<br />

Laboratory for Medical Radiation Research for Radiation Oncology,<br />

Vienna, Austria<br />

: Inter and intrafractional <strong>org</strong>an motion plays an<br />

important role in multifractional brachytherapy treatment when one<br />

dose plan is used for multiple fractions, or when <strong>org</strong>an movement<br />

happens in between imaging and dose delivery. The dosimetric impact<br />

<strong>of</strong> such motions has been reported previously in singleinstitutional<br />

studies.<br />

The aim <strong>of</strong> this study is to compare the dosimetric impact <strong>of</strong> <strong>org</strong>an<br />

position variations by a retrospective multicentre analysis with<br />

different application techniques and fractionation schemes.<br />

: Data from 5 centers in the GYNGEC ESTRO<br />

Network using intracavitary (tandem/ovoid or tandem/ring)<br />

applicators +/ interstitial needles were collected.<br />

To assess dosimetric effects <strong>of</strong> the motion <strong>of</strong> critical <strong>org</strong>ans (bladder,<br />

rectum, sigmoid) between treatment fractions, multiple image scans<br />

(MRI or CT) were analysed. OAR were contoured on images at the time<br />

<strong>of</strong> BT planning as well as on a subsequent image series acquired prior<br />

to treatment <strong>of</strong> a subsequent HDR or PDR fraction. Dose plans<br />

generated by using the 1 st image series were superimposed onto the<br />

subsequent image sets and DVH parameters were calculated.<br />

DVH data for a total <strong>of</strong> 96 patients was available (323 image/contour<br />

sets, 254 MRI, 69 CT). DVH data for 16 fractions were available for<br />

each patient. The average time between consecutive image<br />

acquisitions varied between centers, from several hours to several<br />

days (mean 73 h, median 22 h, range 5 h – 22 d).<br />

: For each patient, D2cc for bladder, rectum and sigmoid were<br />

calculated based on images and contour sets acquired at different<br />

times during the BT treatment (at time <strong>of</strong> planning (D2cc_1) + at time

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!