27.09.2014 Views

The Toxicologist - Society of Toxicology

The Toxicologist - Society of Toxicology

The Toxicologist - Society of Toxicology

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

analyzed quantitatively. A dose dependent induction <strong>of</strong> DNA breaks and pyrimidine<br />

dimers was characterized using an adapted protocol <strong>of</strong> the single cell gel electrophoresis<br />

(comet assay). P53 accumulation measured with an ELISA, 5 hours<br />

post UV exposure, was shown to reach a plateau by exposure times over 15 minutes.<br />

By then, the apoptosis rate related to Caspase-3 activity, measured 18 hours<br />

post exposure, started to increase. Finally, quantitative RT-PCR on genes controlled<br />

by p53 showed that (i) p21 and GADD45 were induced; (ii) whereas a clear induction<br />

<strong>of</strong> MDM2 required relatively high UV doses. This study shows that reconstructed<br />

skin is a useful tool as part <strong>of</strong> in vitro strategies for the assessment <strong>of</strong> photoprotection<br />

and photogenotoxicity.<br />

497 MST2000 - A NEW RECONSTRUCTED HUMAN<br />

EPIDERMIS WITH INTEGRATED FUNCTIONAL<br />

PRIMARY MELANOCYTES.<br />

J. J. H<strong>of</strong>fmann 1 , B. Becker 1 , A. Thiemann 2 , S. Weimans 2 , E. Heisler 2 and H.<br />

W. Fuchs 1 . 1 R & D, CellSystems Biotechnologie Vertrieb GmbH, St. Katharinen,<br />

Germany and 2 Laboratorium für Toxikologie und Ökologie, Evonik Stockhausen<br />

GmbH, Krefeld, NRW, Germany. Sponsor: B. De Wever.<br />

<strong>The</strong> development <strong>of</strong> new active compounds for skin bleaching and tanning are important<br />

issues for the cosmetic and pharmaceutical industry. However active ingredients<br />

have to be tested extensively for their efficacy and product safety. <strong>The</strong> aim <strong>of</strong><br />

the present study was to create a reconstructed epidermis containing keratinocytes<br />

and melanocytes as a tool especially for efficacy studies. Based on the technology <strong>of</strong><br />

the Epidermal Skin Test - EST1000 (CellSystems® Biotechnologie Vertrieb<br />

GmbH, Germany) several batches <strong>of</strong> skin models with different ratios <strong>of</strong><br />

melanocytes and keratinocytes were produced and characterised.<br />

This characterisation included histological examinations to investigate the structural<br />

properties <strong>of</strong> the epidermis and immunohistochemical staining <strong>of</strong> the<br />

melanocytes by using anti-HMB45 antibodies.<br />

An important feature for testing effects on skin pigmentation is the feasibility <strong>of</strong><br />

cultivating the models for at least ten days after substance application without significant<br />

loss <strong>of</strong> viability. <strong>The</strong>refore, the models were cultured for different periods at<br />

the air liquid interphase followed by a standard MTT assay to determine their viability.<br />

Finally the melanin content for each test approach was measured.<br />

Increasing melanin contents were observed after direct UV-radiation which additionally<br />

lead to a visible tanning <strong>of</strong> the epidermis. This effect was strongly affected by<br />

several active ingredients that (i.a.) were known to directly inhibit tyrosinase activity.<br />

We conclude from these results that the newly developed melanocyte containing<br />

epidermal model is a useful tool for research and for characterisation <strong>of</strong> skin tanning<br />

or bleaching substances and for cognate applications which require model systems<br />

with melanocytes.<br />

498 IN VITRO PREDICTION OF THE VALIDATED<br />

SKINETHIC RHE 42 BIS SKIN IRRITATION TEST<br />

METHOD FOR THE GLOBALLY HARMONIZED<br />

SYSTEM (GHS) OF CLASSIFICATION AND LABELLING<br />

OF CHEMICALS.<br />

A. de Brugerolle de Fraissinette 1 , C. Tornier 1 , J. Cotovio 2 , J. Meunier 2 and N.<br />

Alépée 2 . 1 SkinEthic Laboratories, Nice, France and 2 L’Oréal, Aulnay sous Bois,<br />

France. Sponsor: G. Nohynek.<br />

European legislations have heightened the need for scientifically validated in vitro<br />

skin irritation test to replace the regulatory Draize eye irritation test. <strong>The</strong> SkinEthic<br />

Reconstructed Human Epidermis (RHE) “42 bis” test method was recognized as a<br />

stand alone test to assess the acute skin irritation by ECVAM by discriminating two<br />

categories, irritant and non irritant substances, according to the European<br />

Classification System (ESAC Statement, November 2008). An adaptation <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Global Harmonization System (GHS) by the European Union (EU) has conducted<br />

to a new EU-GHS Classification. According to the new rules for classification, the<br />

cut <strong>of</strong>f score to distinguish between no category to category 2 substances was<br />

shifted to 2.3 from 2.0 (former EU system). Consequently, test substances with in<br />

vivo scores between 2 and 2.3 are now considered as non-irritants. <strong>The</strong> aim <strong>of</strong> the<br />

study was to determine in vitro prediction <strong>of</strong> the SkinEthic RHE test method. For<br />

this purpose, the global performances <strong>of</strong> the test method were recalculated on a<br />

large set <strong>of</strong> test substances representative <strong>of</strong> different physico-chemical properties<br />

(including the catch-up validation set). <strong>The</strong> predictive capacity values (specificity,<br />

sensitivity and accuracy) were at least comparable to the required predictive values<br />

criteria defined by ECVAM as described in the Skin irritation background document.<br />

<strong>The</strong>refore, the SkinEthic RHE test method was considered as a test method<br />

adopted in the draft in vitro skin iritation OECD Test Guideline.<br />

499 MEETING REQUIREMENTS OF THE NEW OECD TG<br />

404 FOR IN VITRO SKIN IRRITATION TESTING:<br />

REPRODUCIBILITY OF THE EPIDERM SKIN<br />

IRRITATION TEST (EPIDERM-SIT) FOLLOWING THE<br />

ECVAM VALIDATION AND ACCEPTANCE AS A FULL<br />

REPLACEMENT METHOD.<br />

M. Klausner, H. Kandarova, P. J. Hayden, J. Kubilus and J. E. Sheasgreen.<br />

MatTek Corp, Ashland, MA.<br />

In autumn 2007, an international validation study was performed to evaluate the<br />

reproducibility and confirm the predictive ability <strong>of</strong> the EpiDerm Skin Irritation<br />

Test (SIT) method. In November 2008, ECVAM endorsed the EpiDerm SIT as a<br />

full replacement method for the in vivo rabbit skin irritation test. As reflected draft<br />

OECD guidelines for skin irritation testing (TG 404), US and EU regulators have<br />

appropriately maintained that a test method must demonstrate reproducibility on<br />

an ongoing basis so that regulators and commercial end users are assured that the<br />

assay method is stable and continues to give valid test results over time. <strong>The</strong> purpose<br />

<strong>of</strong> the present study was to investigate the reproducibility <strong>of</strong> the EpiDerm SIT<br />

post-validation. Over a 4-month period in 2009, 12 independent lots <strong>of</strong> EpiDerm<br />

tissue were exposed to 3 irritants (alpha terpineol, heptanal, and butyl methacrylate),<br />

3 non-irritants (benzyl benzoate, benzyl salicylate, and isopropanol) and the<br />

positive control (sodium dodecyl sulphate) and negative control (Dulbecco’s phosphate<br />

buffered saline) using the SIT protocol. As per the SIT method, tissue viability<br />

was determined using the robust and cost effective MTT assay following a single,<br />

60-minute exposure and 42-hour post-exposure incubation. In all cases, the<br />

SIT method correctly identified the irritants and non-irritants. Coefficients <strong>of</strong> variation<br />

(CV) between the tests (n=12) for the tissue viability for all test articles were<br />

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!