27.09.2014 Views

The Toxicologist - Society of Toxicology

The Toxicologist - Society of Toxicology

The Toxicologist - Society of Toxicology

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

samples, OPN levels were significantly influenced by diet with DHA exhibiting<br />

62% and 80% that <strong>of</strong> SAF and CRN, respectively. Thus, DHA suppression <strong>of</strong><br />

OPN is a potential critical early event in the downregulation <strong>of</strong> aberrant humoral<br />

autoimmunity in murine lupus nephritis.<br />

1785 MODULATION OF BODY FAT MASS AND LEAN<br />

WEIGHT IN DEOXYNIVALENOL-INDUCED BODY<br />

WEIGHT REDUCTION IN THE OBESE MOUSE.<br />

K. Hattori 1, 2 , B. Flannery 1 , C. Amuzie 1 and J. J. Pestka 1 . 1 Food Science and<br />

Human Nutrition, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI and 2 Nutritional<br />

Science, Tokyo University <strong>of</strong> Agriculture, Setagaya-ku, Tokyo, Japan.<br />

Our laboratory has observed that deoxynivalenol (DON) can both prevent and<br />

ameliorate weight gain in the diet-induced obese (DIO) mouse model. Here we related<br />

DON’s therapeutic effects in DIO mice to food intake, body fat mass and<br />

lean weight. B6C3F1 mice (female, 11-week-old) were divided into 3 groups and<br />

fed each diet (10 kcal%, 45 kcal% and 60 kcal% from fat, Research Diets, Inc.) for<br />

94 days. After inducing obesity, the mice were divided into 5 groups (n=8) and fed<br />

control diet (10 kcal%) or high-fat diets (45 kcal% or 60 kcal%) with or without<br />

DON (10 ppm) from Day 94 to 147. Body weights <strong>of</strong> the 45 kcal% + DON and<br />

60 kcal% + DON groups rapidly decreased after DON intake and reached that <strong>of</strong><br />

the 10 kcal% control by Day 105. As compared to the 45 and 60 kcal% groups,<br />

food intake by DON-fed groups significantly decreased at Day 98 and 101, which<br />

corresponded to the period in which DON-fed groups exhibited robust body<br />

weight decreases. As determined with MRI (EchoMRI-100), body fat mass and<br />

body fat percentages <strong>of</strong> the 45 and 60 kcal% with DON-fed mice gradually reduced<br />

to those <strong>of</strong> control. Lean weights <strong>of</strong> the DON-fed groups were significantly<br />

lower than those <strong>of</strong> the 45 and 60 kcal% groups after Day 122. We conclude that<br />

DON-induced reduction in body weight in the DIO mice results from decreased<br />

food intake, and this corresponds to decreases in both body fat mass and lean<br />

weight.<br />

1786 NORMAL RANGE AND FORMS OF DIETARY<br />

SELENIUM PREVENTS METHYLMERCURY TOXICITY<br />

IN LONG EVANS RATS.<br />

N. V. Ralston. Energy & Environmental Research Center, University <strong>of</strong> North<br />

Dakota, Grand Forks, ND. Sponsor: M. Aschner.<br />

Methylmercury (MeHg) is a highly specific irreversible inhibitor <strong>of</strong> selenium (Se)-<br />

dependent enzymes (Se-enzymes). Over 30 genetically unique Se-enzymes are expressed<br />

in mammals, many with roles in preventing and reversing oxidative damage<br />

in the brain. <strong>The</strong> Se-enzymes employ selenocysteine (Sec) at their active sites and<br />

MeHg intoxication inhibits Se-enzyme activities in brain and neuroendocrine tissues.<br />

Supplemental Se has been known to counteract Hg toxicity since 1967, but<br />

mechanisms have only recently become clear. Since dietary Se must be reduced to<br />

inorganic forms before it can be incorporated into Sec, it was not known whether<br />

dietary Se from ocean fish would be as effective as inorganic Se provided in the diet.<br />

In the current study, 120 weanling male Long Evans rats were fed diets containing<br />

either low or high MeHg (0.5 or 50 nmol MeHg/g) with Se as inorganic Se<br />

(sodium selenite) at low, normal, or rich (0.1, 1.0, or 10 nmol Se/g) in diets prepared<br />

with torula yeast protein (as~30% <strong>of</strong> nutritionally complete AIN-93G diet).<br />

or Se from delipidated protein isolated from bigeye tuna, swordfish, or mako shark<br />

added as 10% <strong>of</strong> the total diet in place <strong>of</strong> an equivalent amount <strong>of</strong> torula yeast protein;<br />

(2 Hg levels x 6 Se diets = 12 dietary treatments). Contributions <strong>of</strong> additional<br />

MeHg in the fish supplemented diets were between 1.6 and 3.6 nmol MeHg/g, and<br />

Se ranged between 2.1 and 3.5 nmol Se/g. Rats were randomly assigned to each <strong>of</strong><br />

the 12 diets (10 rats per group). After 5 weeks on low Se diets (without added<br />

MeHg) to deplete their Se reserves, all rats were switched to their assigned dietary<br />

treatments. Rats maintained on high MeHg, low Se diets showed growth inhibition<br />

after 4 weeks, and hind limb crossing after 9 weeks on the dietary treatment, but all<br />

other dietary treatment groups grew normally and were protected against neur<strong>of</strong>unctional<br />

defects. <strong>The</strong> MeHg from fish did not contribute to worsening MeHg<br />

toxicity, but the Se from fish was absorbed and utilized as readily as inorganic Se,<br />

and was equally effective in preventing MeHg toxicity.<br />

1787 PRECLINCAL SAFETY EVALUATION OF U.S. FDA-<br />

APPROVED ONCOLOGY DRUGS: RECENT TRENDS IN<br />

CONCURRENCE WITH DRAFT ICH S9 GUIDELINE.<br />

M. Z. Dieter, S. L. Ralston, L. A. Gallenberg and J. E. Burkhardt. Abbott<br />

Laboratories, Abbott Park, IL.<br />

<strong>The</strong> approval packages <strong>of</strong> oncology compounds recently approved by the United<br />

States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) were evaluated in order to gauge<br />

trends in preclinical toxicology studies performed to support development <strong>of</strong> anticancer<br />

compounds, as outlined in the draft International Conference on<br />

Harmonisation (ICH) S9 guideline on Nonclinical Evaluation for Anticancer<br />

Pharmaceuticals. Analysis was limited to original applications approved from July<br />

1999 through July 2009. Data was collected from Summary Basis <strong>of</strong> Approval<br />

(SBA) documents via the PharmaPendium database current as <strong>of</strong> July 2009.<br />

SBA’s for 28 oncology-indicated small molecule or biotherapeutic compounds were<br />

evaluated for the scope <strong>of</strong> toxicology studies conducted. ICH S7A “core battery”<br />

safety pharmacology studies were conducted for 12 compounds; however, 6 compounds<br />

were approved with no safety pharmacology studies performed. Acute single<br />

dose and repeat dose range-finding studies were conducted in at least one<br />

species for the majority <strong>of</strong> compounds. Pivotal repeat-dose studies were variable in<br />

length from 1 month to 1 year, but generally conducted for at least 6 months in two<br />

species. ICH S2 “standard battery” genotoxicity assays were performed for 17 compounds,<br />

including 5 with expected mechanism-based genotoxity. Genotoxicity assays<br />

were not conducted for two monoclonal antibodies. Carcinogenicity studies<br />

were conducted for 5 compounds. Embry<strong>of</strong>etal toxicity (Seg II) studies were conducted<br />

in both rodent and non-rodent species for 18 <strong>of</strong> the compounds; for each <strong>of</strong><br />

the 8 compounds evaluated in only one species, the compound was considered a selective<br />

developmental toxicant. Fertility (Seg I) studies were conducted for the majority<br />

<strong>of</strong> compounds, whereas neonatal and postnatal development (Seg III) studies<br />

were conducted for only 4 compounds. <strong>The</strong> results signify that many recommendations<br />

contained in the draft ICH S9 guideline are already being adopted, and that<br />

this guideline, once finalized, should expedite development <strong>of</strong> oncology agents for<br />

advanced cancer patients.<br />

1788 IMPACT OF DATA AVAILABILITY ON THE<br />

CALCULATION OF REACH DNELS FOR WORKER AND<br />

CONSUMER POPULATIONS.<br />

R. Roy, N. Pechacek, L. Milchak and R. Skoglund. 3M Company, St. Paul, MN.<br />

Under the European Union’s Registration, Evaluation, Authorization, and restriction<br />

<strong>of</strong> CHemicals (REACH) regulation, the Derived No-Effect Level (DNEL)<br />

represents a level <strong>of</strong> exposure above which humans should not be exposed.<br />

Chemical-specific DNELs for worker (W-DNEL) and consumer (C-DNEL) populations<br />

are <strong>of</strong>ten derived as part <strong>of</strong> the chemical safety assessment. <strong>The</strong> European<br />

Chemicals Agency (ECHA) has developed guidance for the calculation <strong>of</strong> DNELs<br />

for both workers and consumers. Steps in DNEL calculation include establishing<br />

study “dose descriptor(s)” such as NOAEL, LOAEL, etc. and their modification for<br />

bioavailability, route-to-route extrapolation and exposure conditions; and, lastly,<br />

application <strong>of</strong> Assessment Factors (AFs) for intra-and inter-species differences, duration<br />

<strong>of</strong> exposure, etc. While it is preferable to use chemical-specific modifiers/factors<br />

in DNEL calculations, many are not [readily] available and, thus, ECHA provides<br />

default factors for use in these calculations.<br />

<strong>The</strong> impact <strong>of</strong> both chemical- and use-specific data (vs. defaults) is illustrated by<br />

calculating W-DNEL and C-DNEL for: (1) long-term inhalation exposure based<br />

on rat inhalation data and (2) long-term dermal exposure based on oral rat data.<br />

Significant differences in W-DNEL and C-DNEL values can be observed depending<br />

on the use <strong>of</strong> chemical-specific data (e.g. dermal and oral absorption data for<br />

route-to-route extrapolation) and consumer use data (e.g. number <strong>of</strong> hours/day <strong>of</strong><br />

exposure). For example, if both dermal and oral % absorption <strong>of</strong> a chemical is<br />

known, the use <strong>of</strong> these data can provide a significantly different DNEL vs. the<br />

DNEL calculated using ECHA defaults. As an example <strong>of</strong> case (2), above, the<br />

DNEL for a chemical with 100% and 10% absorption via oral and dermal routes,<br />

respectively, will be 10-fold greater than that calculated using the ECHA defaults.<br />

This exercise shows the importance <strong>of</strong> using reliable, available, chemical-specific<br />

data for calculation <strong>of</strong> DNELs for use in REACH compliance.<br />

1789 ICCVAM RECOMMENDATIONS FOR USE OF THE<br />

LLNA FOR EVALUATING THE ALLERGIC CONTACT<br />

DERMATITIS POTENTIAL OF PESTICIDE<br />

FORMULATIONS.<br />

J. Matheson 1 , A. Jacobs 2 , M. Wind 1 , J. Chen 3 , M. Hashim 3 , M. Lewis 3 , E.<br />

Margosches 3 , D. McCall 3 , T. McMahon 3 , J. Redden 3 , R. Ward 3 and W. Stokes 4 .<br />

1<br />

CPSC, Bethesda, MD, 2 U.S. FDA, Silver Spring, MD, 3 U.S. EPA, Washington,<br />

DC and 4 NICEATM, NIEHS, Research Triangle Park, NC.<br />

ICCVAM has updated its 1999 validation report on the LLNA based on a recent<br />

evaluation <strong>of</strong> the usefulness and limitations <strong>of</strong> the LLNA for assessing the skin sensitizing<br />

potential <strong>of</strong> pesticide formulations. This review was initiated because the<br />

original report did not include an analysis <strong>of</strong> the LLNA for these types <strong>of</strong> substances,<br />

and there were growing regulatory concerns that the LLNA might not<br />

identify sensitizing pesticide formulations. LLNA data from 104 formulations were<br />

380 SOT 2010 ANNUAL MEETING

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!